Le Havre (2011) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4) : A small tale in one French port city

It is now late December, and it is getting colder here in South Korea. The shabby arthouse theater I visited in the last evening was a cold place with a very few audiences at that time(Besides me, there were only four audiences), and the theater manager even offered us the blankets, but it was okay for me at least, because watching “Le Havre” was a small warm experience that has grown on me since I left the theater late at that night.

The director Aki Kaurismäki’s films are so dry that I may only describe the characters and their situations if I try to talk about his movies in my writing – and I might get away with my delinquency. His deadpan approach is so simple that you probably do not understand why it is funny until you see it for yourself. For instance, one character in his new film “Le Havre” buys a certain fruit in the middle of the story, and then he walks into the bar to have some conversation with a bar owner. The camera does nothing except simply observes the man sitting on one of the tables and the fruit placed on the table right next to him, but it somehow made me smile.

Kaurismäki’s films are usually set in the urban area of Finland, and his unhappy characters are stuck in hard time while yearning for the escape from the ennui and dreariness of their daily life, as shown in “Shadows in Paradise”(1986) and “Ariel”(1988). But this time, it is a little different. Set in Le Havre, a French port city in Normandy, he presents us a middle-aged couple content with their poor lifestyle and happy to be together – and he makes a movie warmer and more accessible than before.

Marcel(André Wilms) is a shoeshine living in Le Havre(I am curious – how many cities in the world are called “The Harbor”?). He moves around the different places in the city for earning money, but it is not so easy for him to work on these days(the opening scene made me to be conscious about what I was wearing on my feet). While watching him working, I thought he would envy the shoeshines I saw in Seoul, who usually occupy the booths on the streets as their workplace for doing other things besides polishing the shoes. I remember that I once needed my shoes to be polished as soon as possible when I was about to attend the lab colleague’s wedding; I went into one of those booths, and the guy did a marvelous job with my old shoes I seldom wore.

Anyway, let’s get back to the film itself. Marcel does not earn money much, but there is always the place waiting for him whenever the day is over. There are his good working-class neighbours, including the bakery owner who demands Marcel to pay off his accumulating bill while well aware of that he will probably never do that. He tells her he will pay it all when a good chance comes(he mentions about “the inheritance” of his wife), but it is a lie, and both know that. The grocery shop owner across the alley chooses a more direct way – he shuts down the store instantly when Marcel walks to the store, though, as we learn later, he is a nice man, after all.

Marcel was once a free-living bohemian who wanted to be a writer when he was young, but now he is settled with his wife Arletty(Kati Outinen – do you remember her far younger self in “Shadows in Paradise” and “The Match Factory Girl”(1990)?) and their dog Laika in their shabby house. We do not know much about how they met in the past(I guess they started as “the best roommates”), but the low-key performances of Wilms and Outinen succinctly conveys us a dry but loving relationship between them.

Meanwhile, a group of illegal immigrants from Gabon, who tried to go to London, are found by the police at one of those huge containers at the port after locked in there for days due to their bad luck. One of them, a boy named Idrissa(Blondin Miguel), manages to escape. When he goes to the riverside to have a lunch, Marcel comes across him hiding from the police. He gives Idrissa the food later, and Marcel soon finds himself taking care of him at his house while the newspapers make a big fuss about this shy, quiet, and nice boy.

Marcel does more than that to help Idrissa. He goes to Calais to find and meet Idrissa’s grandfather who was with him in that container. He even concocts a secret plan to send Idrissa to London where Idrissa’s mother lives. While Marcel is absent, Idrissa can take care of himself well, and Laika, who deserves to appear with others in the movie poster, is always near him.

 Marcel’s neighbours also help him, too. Except one petty guy(Jean-Pierre Léaud – remember Antoine Doinel in “400 Blows”(1959)?), his neighbours do not tell anything to the police. Captain Monet(Jean-Pierre Darroussin, very serious with a black suit, a black coat, black shoes, black gloves, and a black hat) seems to be determined to do his job, but Darroussin gives us a subtle hint that Monet does not like what he has to do. Monet can be flexible, and the loose suspense of the film depends on how much flexible he can be.

While Marcel is busy with helping Idrissa, Arletty is in the hospital. She knows she has been ill, and she hides that from her husband, but she can’t hide it from him any more now, except that her days can be counted. She is sent to the hospital early in the film, so she does not know much about what is going around her husband, but, when Idrissa comes to her at the hospital to deliver the message from her husband, she accepts the message from the boy she barely knows. Outinen expresses little in the face, but this scene is one of the warmest spots in the film along with its charming soundtrack. Later in the story, there is an illegal concert promoted by Marcel and his Vietnamese colleague(Quoc Dung Nguyen) to gather the money for helping Idrissa, and a singer named Little Bob(Roberto Piazza) gets a little showstopper moment with his live performance.

“Le Havre”, which received the FIPRESCI Prize at the Cannes film festival early in this year, is probably the sweetest film directed by Kaurismäki. At the end of the film, something unbelievable happens, but we can accept it as much as the other realistic parts of the story. As one South Korean critics once said, a good fairy tale does not come from nowhere; it comes from the reality, and, in its own droll way, “Le Havre” provides the hard reality to make that the small miracle in the film more precious and real. The story is brighter than his previous works, but Kaurismäki does not lose any edge of his deadpan humor and the cold, harsh reality inside it – that is the main reason why this small, sweet, and warm mug of hot cocoa feels warmer than I thought.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol (2011) ☆☆☆(3/4) : Back in another incredible mission

Three weeks ago, I had to endure a new Twilight movie at the local theater on Sunday evening, but I got a much better thing before being suffered by that tepid Harlequin romance about not-so-scary vampires and werewolves: the promotional video clip for the new movie “Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol”. I am sure they were very careful about the star’s safety when they shot the scene, but I must confess that I winced while watching Cruise do that dangerous stunt around the top of the Burj Khalifa building, which is at present the highest building in the world.

So, I came to get the excellent standard with which I can appreciate the film itself, and I could ask this question – is the film as thrilling as that video clip? The answer is yes, and “Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol” is better than we can expect in the time when we are sort of tired of this endless parade of the sequels nowadays.

Actually, the movie is better than the previous installments in the series with noticeable improvements. Besides that sequence involved with the Burj Khalifa, the film has other impressive action scenes, and it also manages to be humorous and goofy while Ethan Hunt and his team members are trying to stop the bad guys with a nefarious plot. Though the world may meet the end at any chance, we are in a safe fun ride, aren’t we?

The plot of the movie is more or less than the coat hanger for the series of the action adventure sequences, so let’s make it brief. Our hero Ethan Hunt(Tom Cruise, of course) is recently given a new mission in Moscow for him and his team members, but it turns out to be the trap set by the villain of the film. As a result, they are framed for the huge bombing at the Kremlin, and their agency, IMF, is quickly shut down due to Ghost Protocol initiated by the American President. Hunt and his team are left with nothing to protect themselves except the limited amount of the resources given to them by the IMF director played by Tom Wilkinson.

 Hunt and others decide to do something in this tight situation – find the guy responsible for their troubles and prevent him from achieving his manic goal, which is none other than the World War III to wipe out the human civilization on the earth for the new beginning. He is a mad strategist named Hendricks, played by Michael Nyqvist from the Swedish version of “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo”(2009). Nyqvist does an adequate job as the villain who can be fully explained and established within few minutes in a short message from IMF, which is, as usual, automatically incinerated few seconds after the message is delivered to the receiver.

The movie serves us the various colorful locations around the world along with the different moods and terrific action sequences for each. I am sure that some of the shots are CGIs, but that thrilling sequence unfolded at the Burj Khalifa feels real to me, and it is certainly more cringe-inducing to me than the promotional clip. While watching Cruise climbing on the glass windows of this tall building is a suspenseful experience, I was constantly unnerved by the absence of one window glass at his team’s room around the 110th floor. You should be very careful in that room especially when you start to fight with your opponent, or…… ugh.

The actions sequences helped a lot by CGIs are equally entertaining, too. There is a car chase sequence associated with a sudden weather incident, and it is both rapid and tense though we and Hunt do not see much from the outside. And we also have the action scene featuring a huge parking garage where parked cars are constantly moved here and there around two characters fighting to the death for grabbing a very important object.

Tom Cruise, called endearingly “Uncle Tom” in South Korea, is approaching to 50, but he does not lose any of his star quality – and he remains as a likable action hero as he was when the first Mission impossible movie was released in 1996. He previously did a memorably risky stunt at the opening sequence of “Mission: Impossible 2”(2000), and now he outdoes himself with this film. I have no idea about what he thought or felt while doing his stunts, but I admire his commitment to his profession.

And the movie comes more close to the teamwork spirit of the original TV series. Though Cruise is the star and the leader in the film, Cruise never overshadows his co-actors who are also having a fun while convincing us that they are doing perilous missions they must do no matter what. Simon Pegg, who appeared briefly in “Mission: Impossible 3”(2006), is a computer expert who finds himself doing more than handling his laptop as a newly added field agent. Paula Patton is lovely as the agent deft at both fighting with a deadly enemy and seducing a clueless target, and Jeremy Renner is a “special analyst” who is, not so surprisingly, more than what he seems to be on the surface. We understand and smile at them when they fumble or hesitate a little when they work. Thank God I do not have to throw myself toward the huge fan which may shred my body – even when the peace of the world is at the stake, I will definitely hesitate to do that for a long, long time.

The movie is directed by Brad Bird, a talented animation director made the wonderful animations such as “The Iron Giant”(1999), “The Incredibles”(2004), and “Ratatouille”(2007). Whether he is also a good live action director or just a hired hand in the production is debatable, but he definitely makes a good debut; this is a smooth, handsome production filled with lots of excitements and thrills worthy of your ticket price. Right after watching this movie with me, my lab colleague told me that he though the running time was 1.5 hours. Considering the running time was actually more than 2 hours, that’s a really good compliment, you know.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Warrior (2011) ☆☆☆(3/4) : They have issues – and they’ll fight in the ring


If you have watched its trailer or heard about “Warrior”, a sports drama about two brothers with the issues to settle down, you may have a pretty good idea about where they will be led to even before watching the film. I did, and I also had some idea about how it will resolve the conflict in the story – and it did not escape my prediction much. However, this sports/family drama film does more than we expect; while the match scenes are dynamic as required, the interactions between characters are also as sparky as them. The ring becomes an ideal place for their conflict, and, propelled by each own motive as well as the unresolved feelings between them, they fight like hell in the ring.

They and their father are the family with lots of, lots of, and lots of hurtful memories. When their father Paddy Conlon(Nick Nolte) comes across Tommy(Tom Hardy), one of his two sons and the one he favored more, Tommy is not so pleased about meeting his father, who must have been a raging alcoholic who made the life of Tommy, his brother, and his dead mother a living hell. Paddy has just returned from his AA meeting, and he wants to prove to his son that he is changed, but Tommy exudes passive hostility with remaining resentment and hurt toward his dad: “I think I liked you better when you were drunk.”

Tommy is an ex-marine returning from Iraq. He does not talk about his experience in the war, and he does not seem to have a future plan, but he has a goal. He goes to the local gym, and he instantly draws the attention from others in the gym when he knocks down a well-known MMA(Mixed martial arts) player preparing for the tournament with 5 million dollars as the grand prize. Through that surprise show, he gets the opportunity to fight in the tournament, and he enlists his father as his trainer, who was a skillful wrestling trainer for him and his brother when they were young. Tommy makes his intention clear to his father; he just wants Paddy as an expert he can rely on for the preparation, not as a father to reconcile with.

You may think that will be changed, but the conversation scene between them implies the hurtful past that cannot be disappeared easily. Paddy knows well about what he had done to his two boys. He has sought for the redemption and forgiveness. He has stopped drinking, and he is about to get a chip for 1000-day-sobriety, but that does not help mend his relationships with sons beyond repair. The movie does not go into details about how terrible he was as an abusive and alcoholic father in such an easy way like flashbacks, because we do not need to see that when we have the actor like Nick Nolte, who can bring the dark background and hidden personal demon to his character without dialogues. There are regret and guilt in his ragged face, but, in his eyes, there also remains an old devil who was once the fearful tyrant to his family. Tommy’s elder brother Brandon(Joel Edgerton) never forgets what his father was. He rejects his dad when he makes a surprise visit to his house to see his granddaughters.

Meanwhile, Brandon has his own reason to participate in that tournament. Leaving behind his time as a player in UFC, he has been living the life of an ordinary high school teacher with a loving wife and two daughters. However, due to his daughter’s illness, he and his wife have been struggling to pay the medical bills, and now there are only two options for him – the petition for bankruptcy or the eviction from their house. He does not want to lose their house, so, out of desperation, he comes to play in an illegal MMA match held in his neighbourhood. He earns considerable amount of money, but, because we live in the age of Internet, his nighttime activity is quickly known to everyone at his school. He gets the suspension as a consequence, so he pushes himself more to that direction with the help from his former trainer Frank(Frank Grillo), who is now more successful than before with his rather unorthodox training method.

While continuing to win in his matches, Brandon sees the big opportunity in the MMA tournament to solve his family’s desperate financial situation. Of course, he fortunately gets the chance, and he logically comes across the brother he has not seen for a long time. Tommy hates his brother as much as their dad because he is still angry about Brandon for leaving him with their ailing mother when they are young. Brandon does not like Tommy, either, though he wants to be nice to his estranged brother. Because blood is thicker than water, their relationship is more complex than a simple matter of hate and resentment – and it is bound to be brought upon the ring sooner or later.


After the patient build-up for the characters during its first hour, the movie goes right into the tournament. The way to the final is quite predictable, but the film compensates with the vivid presentation of the matches held in the ring – or the cage as they call in the film. I have no particular interest in MMA(as a matter of fact, I am not much interested in other sports, either), and I do not know about the rules, but the director Gavin O’Connor succeeds in making me cringe every time he shows the matches between the competitors in the tournaments. The choppy editing is a little bit distracting, but the message is clear: this is a brutal game in which players are not only punched and kicked, but also are thrown against the fence or the floor. The movements you have seen in the wrestling games are also allowed, which provide several intensive moments when the players are entangled with each other on the floor. Maybe it is exciting to watch them outside the cage, but this is not so exciting when you look at closely.

The characters stand firm amid these ruthless matches, and, as the two underdogs we equally care about, Tom Hardy and Joel Edgerton are believable whether they are on the ring or outside the ring; it shows that they went through the rigorous preparation for their respective roles. The movie also provides the space for fleshing out the important supporting characters including Brandon’s wife played by Jennifer Morrison, who naturally worries about her husband resuming his former violent career. The running time of the film is more than 2 hours, and I wonder whether South Korean distributors enhanced the film by trimming around 20 minutes, but I think it is not so overlong although it has several unnecessary scenes I can live without.

I watched “The Fighter”(2010), another sports/family drama, early in this year, and I sometimes think I was a little too harsh toward the movie with my 2.5 stars rating in spite of good things to be appreciated. But two elements in that film, sports and drama, are still felt disjointed to me. In case of “Warrior”, though it is more generic than “The Fighter”, these two elements are focused right together in the ring, and it does deliver what it promises to us with its effective finale. Sure, it’s predictable from the start, but it earnestly struggles, and we can agree to that it gets the payoff it deserves.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Campus Avian gang on winter afternoon (12/03/11)

                 
It is getting colder. They are hungry – so they extort snacks from innocent citizens.
Posted in Photos | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Rare Exports: A Christmas Tale (2010) ☆☆☆(3/4) : Santa is alive – and he is not nice

To anyone who wants to watch an offbeat movie for the upcoming holiday season, “Rare Exports: A Christmas Tale” can be a nice mixed bag full of the goodies to be appreciated. The movie is a dark, amusing horror fantasy with Santa Claus as a malevolent supernatural entity far different from the one we are familiar with. He surely knows whether you are naughty or not, but, instead of giving the present to you, he will punish you if he thinks you are naughty, and his punishment will not be merely shoving coal in your stocking. I have no clear idea about what exactly he can do to those poor ‘naughty’ children put into the sacks, but I guess he is as savage as that murderous Robot Santa in the TV animation series “Futurama”, one of whose memorable lines is “I’m going to tear off your skin like wrapping paper and deck the hall with your guts!”

The premise of the film is a time-honored tradition in the horror genre – what if an old story turns out to be real? In the opening scene set on the summit of the Korvatunturi mountain in Lapland, Finland(Yes, it does exist in Finland, like the Eyjafjallajökull mountain in Iceland – and it is easier to spell, by the way), the workers hired by an American named Mr. Riley(Per Christian Ellefsen) are drilling the ground. It is 24 days before Christmas, and they finally discover something significant. Mr. Riley is excited about historically monumental discovery that will put even the pyramids in Egypt to shame. According to the local legend not as old as you think, this mountain has been known as Santa Claus’ residence(postal code: 99999 Korvatunturi), and what they have found is the grave of Santa Claus.

 The focus of the story moves on to Pietari(Onni Tommila), a bright young boy who lives in the rural town near the Korvatunturi mountain. He happens to hear what Mr. Riley announces to his hired men when he sneaks into the drill site with his friend out of the curiosity we usually observe from those inquisitive boys. He instantly begins his private research with the load of books on Santa Claus folklore. I wonder where he gets these well-maintained books accompanied with the excellent illustrations shown in the montage sequence; I did not see much of his town in the film, but I am sure they have the library, don’t they?

Through his diligent research, Pietari learns the disturbing aspect of the origin of Santa Claus. Long before his image was assimilated into that of Saint Nicholas to become the benevolent figure of the holiday season we know, the pagan version of Santa Claus in Finland, Joulupukki(Yule Goat), was not a nice guy at all. It was said that the local folks were sick of his annual reign of terror, so they lured him to the frozen lake. Santa was trapped below in the lake, and, in the next year, they buried him below the mountain, still frozen in the ice. I heard Yule Goat, originally a spirit of darkness, was actually less diabolical than how he is depicted in the film(He frightened children and demanded the presents instead of giving them – what a naughty dude he was), but, what the heck, we know this film is not a folklore lecture at the campus.

Pietari believes that legend as seriously as I believed the old Korean stories about a thousand-year-old fox with nine tails when I was young(I once thought my mom was that cunning fox and she would snatch my liver at night while my dad went out for business). He is on the alert, especially after finding the unidentified footsteps on the snow outside his bedroom window, but nobody around him takes him seriously.

Meanwhile, the strange incidents are happening around the town, which perplex the adults in the town including Pietari’s widowed father Rauno(Jorma Tommila), and then, a mysterious old man appears out of nowhere. Unlike the adults, Pietari knows what’s going on. Santa has been very much alive in the ice – and he will soon be back in business.

There are effective moments with mounting tension and dread, but “Rare Exports” is essentially an one-joke horror film. The movie knows that, and it takes a wise way to handle its outrageous premise; it maintains an utmost serious attitude throughout its running time. The characters, simple but well-defined, are quite earnest about the matters they come across, and we can accept that they are really threatened by the supernatural entity which is preposterous but certainly not laughable at all.

It amuses us frequently with its sly, subtle humor behind its straight face. I cannot help but be tickled by some of R-rated contents in the film – the naked running figures at Christmas night are not something you see everyday. In the film, there are several clear signs of the influence from “The Thing from Another World”(1951) and its following remake versions, and, when I watched the recent remake version later, my mind instantly connected that movie with “Rare Exports”. I wondered at one point why that monstrous alien, who can perfectly imitate any organisms it absorbs, cannot imitate a certain body part frequently shown in the latter.

The technical aspects of the film match its level of seriousness. The movie has a good chilly atmosphere and the excellent wintry location with lots of snow to unfold its story. Though CGI is a little too apparent in the film, it is incorporated well inside the story while not ruining the viewing experience. It is Christmas season, so you may expect the reindeer for Santa running across that beautiful snow field shown in the film, but, unfortunately, the reindeer in this movie meet the fate which is probably worse than being annually hunted by the town people for the meat.

As a consequence, the night before Christmas becomes very desolate for Rauno and Pietari at their house, because now they will be in the financial misery due to the ruined reindeer season. Onni Tommila and Jorma Tommila are father and son in real life, and their relationship is naturally formed in their scenes. The way Rauno lets his son into his workplace next to their house is silly at first, but you can see how a thoughtful father he is to his son. As we expect from the SF/horror movies featuring kids, Rauno does not listen to his son well when Pietari wants to say something important to his dad, but he has a good reason(he has an urgent(and messy) business to deal with), and he eventually helps his son when Pietari has the plan to solve the problem of them and others. I particularly remember the detached but somehow humane conversation scene between the tired father and worried son; it is so dry that it deserves to be included in Aki Kaurismäki’s films.

There is also a part that functions well as a fun adventure movie in the story, and the movie ultimately places itself somewhere between the chilly suspense and the feisty innocence. Pietari is surely our plucky young hero to root for; he is smart, and he is brave enough to do some actions I did and will not dare to do. I do not like to watch a child in possible danger, but Pietari is determined to do what he thinks should be done, and the movie becomes as spirited as he is, like the kid adventure movies in the 1980s to which “Super 8”(2011) gives a loving tribute.

“Rare Exports” is originated from the director Jalmari Heldaner’s two funny short films made in 2003 and 2005(“Rare Export Inc.” and “The Official Rare Exports Inc. Safety Instructions”). You can find them at YouTube or the website of the film, but I recommend you to watch the film first, for they can be the spoilers. When the climax was over, I was curious about what the characters will do next, and then I was very amused by the film’s sweet, whimsy answer to my question. I will not unwrap it before you do, but let’s say Helander’s short films are intended to be the satires for the commercialization of Christmas. They hit right on the target, and I enjoyed them as much as the movie itself.

Like “Bad Santa”(2003), “Rare Exports” has enough potential to be regarded as the cult film ideal for the Christmas season. The movie is a good chilly horror movie mixed with quirkiness and pluckiness for your winter night entertainments, if you have a little darker taste for Christmas tales. Come to think of it, several memorable films associated with Christmas have their own dark side and that is one of the reasons why they linger on our minds; in case of “Rare Exports”, it just has a darker and bloodier side to tell an enjoyable spooky story with gingerbread.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Adventures of Tintin(2011) ☆☆☆(3/4) : It’s an exhilarating test drive with old-fashioned charm

It is easy to criticize that “The Adventures of Tintin”, the first animation feature directed by Steven Spielberg, is more or less than a test drive for him – but this is an exhilarating one for us. With spirited handling of the motion capture technique, Spielberg brings that old-fashioned enthusiasm some of you experienced with his Indiana Jones movies at theaters. I was a kid who watched them only through VHS(and DVD later in the 2000s) and later had to be content with “Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of Crystal Skull”(2008) at the local theater(no, it was not as bad as some claimed and I liked it), and this is an exciting present for me despite some serious reservation on the final product.

I guess there are certainly lots of people who are more familiar than me with Hergé’s comic book series about the adventures of a smart young reporter named Tintin and his loyal dog Snowy(or Milou in original version). I remember I briefly watched the TV animation series based on, and I liked it as much as I did when I recently did some quick basic research on Hergé’s books at the campus library before watching Spielberg’s film.

After the main title sequence buoyed by the bouncy score composed by the maestro John Williams(welcome back, Mr. Williams!), the story begins with Tintin in the middle of his adventurous reporter career, which is represented well by several framed articles hung on the walls at his residence. If you know more than me about the Tintin series, you may recognize some of them and have a little knowing smile on your face while I remain nearly clueless.

On one afternoon, during his stroll with Snowy at the street market, Tintin(Jamie Bell) comes across one fabulous model ship. He decides to buy it at a cheap price, but right after he has bought it, two people appear in front of him. Each of them tries to buy it from Tintin with a much higher price. Tintin refuses the offers and goes back to his home, never realizing that he will soon finds himself thrown in a grave danger. Even before learning what is going on or the secret behind the message hidden in his model ship he has just found, he is quickly kidnapped by the sailors hired by a sinister guy named Sakharine(Daniel Craig), one of two men Tintin met at the market. He is certainly not as sweet as his name suggests when he demands Tintin to give him what he wants.

While trying to escape from SS Karaboudjan, the ship in which he is imprisoned, Tintin encounters its alcoholic captain Haddock(Andy Serkis), who has been kept in his cabin with the constant supply of booze(he’s quite happy with that, of course) for some reason. Along with Snowy, who has been following Tintin, both of them manage to escape from the ship, and that is the start of the series of the action sequences filled with excitement and thrill.

The screenplay by Steven Moffat, Joe Cornish, and Edgar Wright is basically a patchwork adapted from no less than three Tintin books. They did a nice job, if not excellent. The seams in their adaptation are clearly shown through less than perfect handing of the pace especially during the first half, and some notable changes including Tintin’s nationality can be awkward to some audiences, but the story remains witty and humorous with fun characters such as a duo of inspectors named Thompson and Thomson(or Dupond and Dupont in the original version, played by a dependable comic duo Simon Pegg and Nick Frost), whose bumbling detective job and several unfortunate slapstick stunts make them the serious rivals for Inspector Clouseau. Thank god this is an animation feature where the characters are can be knocked down without serious injuries – or they will probably suffer from the brain damages like Derek Boogaard.

Above all, “The Adventure of Tintin” is a terrific visual experience. The characters and their worlds are nicely rendered into the digital animation, and I enjoyed them a lot. Furthermore, it has what you naturally expect from the director of “The Raiders of Lost Ark”(1981). The action sequences are filled with the energy and the sense of fun, evoking the our fun time with that movie and following sequels in the 1980s. Although his trials with animation action in this film are not always effective, you can feel the joyous excitement and curiosity from the director trying something different to him while also trying to find out what possibly he can do with the new tools available to him. There is quite an admirable longtake action sequence which probably cannot be achieved in live action movies at least in my opinion. I and the audiences fully focused on the characters’ very busy and perilous situation on the screen at last night, and I forgot for a moment I was wearing 3D glasses, which is usually a good sign of excellent 3D effect.

By the way, is 3D necessary for this film? Well, though I am very willing to check out my personal doubt on it with 2D version later, let’s say they did an admirable job like the other notable 3D motion capture animation features like “Polar Express”(2004) and “Christmas Carol”(2009). Except the scenes on SS Karaboudjan, most of the scenes in the film are under the sun, so they are bright enough for us not to care about the dimness of 3D glasses. Besides, this is the animation feature which is a joy ride suitable for 3D, and, like other talented directors, Spielberg knows how not to distract us with 3D. A very few things protruded out of the screen, and, when I finally took off my glasses, the movie was already over.


 And there is also that old problem with the uncanny valley. In case of two motion capture animations mentioned above, they are wintry ghost stories which somehow justify that creepy unnatural quality in the faces of their CGI characters. In case of Tintin, the valley gets widened compared to other characters surrounding him, some of whose faces are more carefully rendered with more details on the screen. This creates constant awkwardness through the film, and I could not shake it off while watching it.

Anyway, the actors behind these CGI characters are having a fun. While Jamie Bell imbues likable earnest to Tintin, Andy Serkis scores again with another memorable motion capture performance to delight us. His performance may be hammy and exaggerated, but what do you expect from an alcoholic guy to whom sobriety and water are the things from another world? Serkis especially does a good job in pulling off the sequence which I found a little too ridiculous even in Hergé’s book; the result is more exciting than, say, that boring Pirates of Caribbean movie I had to endure in this year, and, as a former heavy drinker, I find his character endearing.

“The Adventures of Tintin” is the first work of the trilogy Spielberg and the producer Peter Jackson, who is an avid fan of Tintin Series like Spielberg, set to make. With such a combination like that, this animation feature underwhelms us a little bit while not fully exploring its potential, but this is still a good work I can enjoy and appreciate, and we can safely expect the next fun adventures of Tintin from Spielberg and Jackson later.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Rabbit Hole (2010) ☆☆☆(3/4) : After their happy life is shattered

“Rabbit Hole” is a typical story we have encountered many times in lots of other dramas. The movie tells us about the happy family life suddenly shattered by a tragic incident and how the family members tries to move on while struggling to deal with their emotional problems including the sense of loss and the grief over a lost one. This sounds familiar indeed(several movies automatically come to my mind for comparison), but it tells its own story with a clear, honest attitude on the deteriorating relationship between its main characters. It never resorts to cheap melodrama while effectively conveying the sadness shrouding them, and there are several moments which rang both truthful and painful to me while I was watching it.

Becca(Nicole Kidman) and Howie(Aaron Eckhart) seem to be an ordinary suburban middle-class couple at first. While he goes out to work, she takes cares of the house. One of their neighbors comes to their home when Becca is tending the garden. She invites Becca to their party, but she courteously refuses. When Howie returns from his workplace, there is certain emptiness not only between them but also inside their household.

Eight months ago, their young son died from a car accident. Becca and Howie have not still recovered from the death of son they loved much. The time has passed, their scar is less hurtful than before, and they try to move on. But both have been going in different directions without much consolation in either case. While Howie sticks to the memory of their son, Becca tries to forget about what happened to him. She removes her son’s clothes from their son’s room, still kept intact. She does not want anything reminding her of their happy life in the past.

 However, the more she tries, the harder it becomes to her. She sharply snaps at anyone who attempts to openly talk about her matter. When she and her husband go to the group therapy meeting, she throws an acerbic comment to the other parent in the group when they say they believe God took away their child because he needed another angel(“Then why wouldn’t He have just made another angel? He’s God, after all. Why not just make another angel?”). In addition, the recent pregnancy of her younger sister Izzy(Tammy Blanchard) reminds her of what she lost. Howie says they can try it again, but she cannot do it, because she witnessed how sudden it is to lose someone you deeply love and cared about.

Their relationship gets more estranged, especially after they realize that there still remains pain, grief, and resentment between them. They are sensible persons, and they try to be nice to each other, but, in such a damaged relationship, the heated confrontation can be suddenly sparked from just one word or sentence they casually blurt out.

Considering the director John Cameron Mitchell’s previous flamboyant works(“Headwig and Angry Inch”(2001) and “Shortbus”(2006)), “Rabbit Hole” is a quite different work from Mitchell. According to him, the story came very close to him, and that shows in the result. Based on David Lindsay-Abaire’s acclaimed Broadway play, the movie is calm, sincere, and sensitive while not mired in the depressing aspect of the story. The characters are believable as ordinary people we know in our life, and the acute observations on the human nature in Lindsay-Abaire’s adapted screenplay are darkly humorous at times, which leavens the depressive mood with small laughs from time to time. The support group therapy can be surely helpful to you when you are in grief, but it also can be as hypocritical and addictive as shown in “Fight Club”(1999). Howie finds someone more sympathetic to his grief than his wife in the meeting, and she says she and her husband have attended the meeting for more than 8 years.

Mitchell pulls the excellent performances from his performers, and Nichole Kidman was nominated for Best Actress Oscar early in this year for her powerful performance in the film. After her Oscar win for “The Hours”(2002), there have been very few chances for her to fully utilize her talent, but now she has the right one to show that she has lost none of her potential shown in her early career. While her character goes through various emotions states along with several twists and turns in the story, she is always convincing throughout the movie and we naturally emphasize with her.

Aaron Eckhart is given a rather thankless job as the husband who more or less stands beside his wife, but he never misses a beat in the scenes with Kidman, and we accept both of them as the devastated human beings struggling to make their life more bearable. Sandra Oh is warm and understanding as the woman who becomes close to Eckhart’s character, and Dianne Wiest is wonderful as Becca’s mother who knows well about the painful process her daughter is going through. There is a poignant moment between Becca and her mother in the basement, where she tells her daughter about how her sense of loss will be taken care of by itself, which resonates with one Korean proverb in my mind – “Time is medicine.”

“Rabbit Hole”, which will belatedly be released at South Korean theaters in late December, is a decent moving human drama about how we can live even after something devastating happens to us. I gave it three stars in this January because I thought it told nothing new about its subject, and I will stick to my initial rating, but I found it more sorrowful, humorous, and touching during my second watching at last night. The direction is precise, the performances are excellent, and the story is heartfelt. There have been similar movies, and I am sure there will be more, but this is one of the better ones that grow on me.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Bullhead (2011) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4) : A Bull to the slaughter

“… I think that we’re all in our private traps, clamped in them, and none of us can ever get out. We scratch and, and claw, but only at the air, only at each other. And for all of it, we never budge an inch.”

– from Alfred Hitchcock’s “Psycho”(1960)

atching Belgian crime noir film “Bullhead”(2011) is like observing a huge dormant volcano convulsively seething and grumbling inside. He wants to forget about what has been eating him, but it is impossible to get away from it, because that made who he is now. Even if it is buried below and everyone is silent about that as if nothing ever had happened, it never goes away; it is bound to burst through the surface, but there is no easy way of release possible for this miserable man violently writhing in his own personal trap.

He is a young cattle farmer named Jacky Vanmarsenile(Matthias Shoenearts). He will remind you of those aggressive, bulky bouncers you have seen at nightclubs, and, right from his first appearance, he does not look like a nice guy at all. He comes to one of his neighbor farmers and enforces him to sell his cattle only to the farm managed by Jacky’s uncle. With his imposing physique and threatening attitude, it is not easy to say no to Jacky, whose family seems to have some influence around Limburg, Belgium.

And this is not a sole dirty activity in his daily life. With the assistance from a crooked veterinarian(Frank Lammers), he and others at the farm get the growth hormone and other illegal substances, and they periodically inject them to their cattle for fattening them in a shorter time. They have been doing this since he was young – only difference is that they use the substances which are less likely to be noticed by the authorities than before.

A big irony is that Jacky has been ‘fattening’ himself in the pretty much same way he has done to his livestock. Considering his bulky appearance, it is not so surprising to see him routinely taking several pills and injecting substances to his own body in his private room, which has a small refrigerator full of the pills and vials always ready for him. After that, probably because he wants to vent what’s inside him, he does some shadowboxing, but his disaffected face never looks relaxed. There is something not right about him. He always becomes uncomfortable in front of the possibility of sex or relationship with woman. Even when others just talk about it, he can’t stand it, and that usually triggers his violent side in one way or other.

Though it cannot be denied that he is a substance abuser, his problem is deeper than that. Through the mediation by his veterinarian, Jacky gets involved with the crime organization in West Flanders. In the first meeting with the boss Marc Decuyper(Sam Louwyck) and his associates, Jacky comes across his old childhood friend Diederik(Jeroen Perceval). It is not Diederik’s intention, but his presence immediately awakens the old wound in the past Jacky has avoided. He becomes agitated and furious. His instinct tells him this is not a good deal.

What happened to them in their past? The movie is very frank about that, for it instantly goes right back to their relatively normal childhood before the horrible incident happened to young Jacky in 20 years ago. They were ordinary kids well aware of what their dads did for their business. Like any kids at their age, they began to show interest in girls and sex. On one day, they became targets of a mentally-disturbed bully whose sister Jacky had some crush on. The movie thankfully refrains itself from showing the graphic details of this shocking moment; thanks to the good performances from young child actors, you will understand how much it has traumatized Jacky both physically and psychologically to make him into such a ticking bomb.

Meanwhile, his instinct turns out to be right, because there is already a serious trouble in their underworld. An undercover cop investigating hormone trafficking is killed, and the police are determined to find who is behind the murder. They know Decuyper is somehow associated with this case, so, along with others including a duo of hapless small-time criminals who is given a job beyond their intelligence, Jacky is logically drawn to their attention.

This is the director/writer Michael R. Roskam’s first work, and he makes a slow-burning noir film with his confident control of style and storytelling. The story seems to meander at the beginning, but it patiently positions the people of crime world around Jacky like spreading the net around him during the first half. We come to understand the world he is stuck in and, above all, what makes him tick. When the net is finally about to close upon him, it goes without saying that there is no easy way out for him. Thanks to cinematographer Nicolas Karakatsanis who provides the gloomy atmosphere over the wide green fields with fatalistic undertone, what eventually happens is accepted as something fateful.

The physical presence of Matthias Schoenaerts, who gained around 27-kg(60 pounds) for his role, is utterly unforgettable, but he does far more than bulking up his body. His quiet but intense performance slowly reveals a tragic man hiding and seething behind his armor more vulnerable than it looks. Even one word he hears or one small casual behavior he glimpses hits him hard. He remembers how helpless he was. He also remembers how helpless his father was at that time(A brief moment in the film shows that he is now more helpless than before). Although he goes to the extreme to forget all about that, but none of his pain or complex is disappeared. His hurtful past remains inside his mind and it continues to torment him. At one point, he tries to settle the score with a guy responsible for his misery, but he is frustrated to see that there is no point in beating a mad dog.

There is a possible bright spot in his depressing life. He has been obsessed with the girl he liked during his childhood. though he has never met her again since that incident. Much to his disappointment, Lucia(Jeanne Dandoy) does not recognize him when he comes to the perfume shop where she works. After meeting him again at the nightclub(he stalks her to that place), she later realizes who he is. Remembering well about ‘the accident’, she feels sorry for him, but she soon learns his dark, monstrous side beneath his shyness. During the moment when he scares her while driven to see her for the last time, you may recall that strange relationship between a beautiful woman and a beastly man who loves her in Claude Chabrol’s “Le Boucher”(1970) – but, in this case, the situation is painfully far simpler and clearer to both of them.

I think there are several aspects in the film that escape my notice due to the cultural gap, though I know that there is the regional/social difference between Wallonia and Flanders in Belgium. The movie could have been a little more interesting if there had been more space for the supporting characters, who are well played by the good actors surrounding Schoenaerts.

Jeroen Perceval is especially notable as a man who is forced to juggle lots of balls in the air. Diederik turns out to be a truer friend than we expected, but he has lots of things to take care of for maintaining his position. He has to do whatever his boss orders, so he deals with his friend still angry about him. Moreover, he is an informer to the police, so he must give them any valuable information about the murder while trying to save his unfortunate friend out of the imminent trouble to come. I especially like the way the movie deals with the interesting interaction between Diederik and two detectives, Eva and Antony(Barbara Sarafian and Tibo Vandenborre). As a ‘bad cop’, Eva does not tolerate any bullshit about ‘coincidences’ with her street-smart no-nonsense attitude; as a ‘good cop’. Antony cajoles Diederik with homosexual appeal to get anything useful from him.

“Bullhead” is Belgium’s official submission to the Best Foreign Language Film category of the 84th Academy Awards in 2012. It starts like a routine thriller but it ultimately reveals itself as a sad, compelling character study about a man shaped by the environment and his destructive complex. In the end, what has been repressed for years and years is finally exploded with desperate brutality. At that moment, Roskam pulls out all the stops, and the result is the powerful moment both brutal and harrowing. No matter how much he writhes with fury, this man will never get out of the route set for him, like the animals led to slaughter. Unlike them, he knows about what will happen, but does it make any difference? This is the man to whom Dr. Temple Grandin will feel a lot of sympathy.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Animal Kingdom (2010) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4) : “Have you worked out where you fit?”

While revisiting David Michôd’s “Animal Kingdom”(2010), I wondered what it was like for its passive teenager hero to live with his heroin addict mother at their small home. We can only assume that she definitely could not get the Mother of the year award, considering the mundane but eerie opening sequence. It’s around afternoon, and her son is watching some TV show, and she seems to be asleep next to him on couch – but we soon learn she died from overdose.

Her son,  Joshua ‘J’ Cody(James Frecheville), already called the ambulance. The paramedics arrive, and they tell him it is too late, though he is more concerned about what’s going on TV show. Later that night, being at a loss about what to do after his mother’s death, he calls his grandmother Janine(Jacki Weaver) for help, who eagerly comes to pick up her daughter’s disoriented son and takes him to her house.

However, we come to realize that, no matter how lousy mother she was, J’s mother was probably his only protection from her criminal family in Melbourne. There is a good reason why she was scared of them; all of his three uncles have been involved in various criminal activities including armed robbery and drug trafficking. Craig Cody(Sullivan Staplenton) is a nervous, volatile drug dealer. Darren Cody(Luke Ford) is the most passive and obedient among three and usually follows his older brothers. Andrew Cody(Ben Mendelsohn), the eldest brother nicknamed “Pope”, is an armed robber currently hiding from the police. And Janine Cody is always near her sons as the matriarch of this dangerous criminal gang. Even though they are all grown-ups, her sons are still her boys to take care of.

Now J becomes a family member again, so he begins to learn the ropes from his uncles, such as how to scare off some aggressive strangers they come across on the street. As the beginning of the main title sequence suggests, their world is more or less like the jungle where only the strong rule and survive. They are a bunch of vicious beasts who have been dominating their turf, and, surrounded and protected by them, J is a cub who will follow their footsteps.

 However, it is a really dangerous time for all of them because the reigning days are over for the Codies and the police are more determined to get them by any means necessary. They know it’s best to stay low for a while, but they do not know what else to do to while scared about what will happen to them(J observes it through his narration; “They were all scared, even if they didn’t show it.”). Their close associate/friend Baz(Joel Edgerton), the most sensible member of the gang, is tired of this; he is seriously considering moving on to a more legitimate and safer field, while his cohorts are helplessly stuck in their criminal mindset.

And then, an incident suddenly happens. I will not go into details about what will be ignited by this incident next, but let’s say the beasts in the story get more scared than before. Like the predators stuck in the corner, they become more paranoid and dangerous. In their view, even their family member can deemed as someone expendable when their safety is concerned, so J’s situation becomes far more unpredictable when detective Leckie(Guy Pierce) approaches to him. Leckie thinks J is the weak link, but so do J’s family, who also regards J’s girlfriend Nicky(Laura Wheelwright) as another potential danger.

The director/writer David Michôd does not exactly break a new ground in the genre, but his first feature film is a good example of crime thriller we rarely come across nowadays. Rather than typical flashy crime actions we usually expect from this genre, his gritty noir tale is mainly fueled by the characters and the intense moments between them. With steady maintenance of the languid atmosphere with the foreboding sense of dread and doom well conveyed by moody, atmospheric score, the movie takes its time to grow the uneasy tension behind the scenes. There are few sudden bursts of violence in the film, and they are more effective because of the unease calm they penetrate. In one disturbing scene, Andrew stares at other characters asleep on the couch, while the camera slowly moves around and then lingers on him for a while. We are relieved by the next shot, but that chillingly resonates with the similar shot shown later in the story. Andrew may be a man capable of generosity, but he is also a ruthless criminal who does whatever he impulsively thinks it is necessary.

Though the era in the movie is not specific(Judging on several electronic products glimpsed in the film, I guess it’s around the late 1990s), Melbourne gained its infamy around the 1980-90s as “the amphetamine capital of Australia” due to increasing drug trafficking, which was followed by the subsequent gangland killings which claimed 36 criminal figures from 1998 to 2010. The family like the Codies actually existed; according to Wikipedia, they inspired not only this film but also two local TV drama series, and one important sequence in the film is loosely based on the Welsh street police shooting in 1988, one of the well-known incidents associated with this criminal family.

The characters and their relationships are established well with a dry, economic approach, and Michôd luckily has the talented cast. Even though we do not see much of the shady business they do for their living, Mendelsohn, Stapleton, Ford, and Edgerton bring the history of crime and violence to their respective characters. We immediately accept them as the dangerous people living in the mundane urban area where an ordinary middle class household exist with a criminally sociopathic one in the same neighbourhood. Michôd also pays some attention to less important characters like Nicky’s mom. The brief moment between her and her daughter lasts more or less than a minute, but it has little poignancy especially during the second watching. Though their relationship seems to be a little problematic, the mother cares about her daughter and the daughter knows that.

The most interesting character in the film is Janine, the emblem of crooked momism. Jacki Weaver deservedly received considerable acclaims along with several critics’ awards and Best Supporting Actress Oscar nomination for her unforgettable performance. She initially looks like a silly hyena walking around the lions, but her fierce eyes reveals the cunning mère fatale. The way she kisses her sons as the sign of affection uncannily reminded me of that memorable private moment between Mrs. Iselin, one of the most famous scary moms in the movie history, and her son in “The Manchurian Candidate”(1962). Don’t you think her kiss is a little too long to be interpreted as plain motherhood?

 Weaver’s wry nuanced acting positions her character on the line between campy weirdness and ice-cold calculation. Though she is old, Janine can be as ruthless as her sons when it comes to her survival, which much depends on her sons. At one point when she has to do something for her dear boys, she justifies her heartless decision with her own twisted logic, while well aware of its consequence as she admits later with her ever-present grotesque sweetness. After all, she does everything she can do for them as their mother, right?

Surrounded by the colorful co-actors, James Frecheville is basically a blank page who functions as our guide to the story. However, he was given a difficult task of playing passive, detached character usually holding his cards behind his back, and he does his job exactly as the screenplay requires. J is relatively naive compared to his uncles, but he knows that it is wise not to reveal his thoughts in the uncertain situation he was hurled into. There is only one moment when he bares out his feelings inside him, which is why we accept his subsequent action later in the story as the inevitability rather than a surprise reversal.

 Until the certain point when he learns there is no one to lean on except himself, J is a big confused kid who is not so sure about where he has to stand in the jungle named Melbourne underworld, and that is probably what Detective Leckie and Nicky sees inside his disaffected attitude. Though their motifs are quite different, both care about him and then are frustrated about him. As one of few bright, humane spots in this dark film, Pierce has a notable scene where his detective character tries to give the advice to J on which side he should choose. It has the danger of merely explaining the metaphor of the story, but, thanks to Michôd and Pierce, it works as a part of the story, not the writer’s explanation to the audiences.

“Animal Kingdom” was one of nice surprises in last year along with “The Square”(2009), another taut thriller from Australia. Both films slowly gripped my attention minute by minute, and they never let it go astray until the credit rolled. I have to admit that “Animal Kingdom” lost some of its power during my second viewing, mainly because surprise and unpredictability are the main components of thriller, but its lean, efficient storytelling still works, and I don’t regret about choosing this compelling movie as one of my favorite films at the end of 2010.

Eventually, some of the characters manage to survive in the end. Their positions are changed a little because of, well, the order of nature in their world. I am not entirely sure about whether that ambiguous final scene – is it the new beginning or the final chapter of their criminal life? I don’t know, but you may agree with me that their future will not be bright no matter what happens next.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

50/50 (2011) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4) : Laugh/Tear – 50/50

  While recognizing the harsh reality in its story without sugar-coating, “50/50” finds humor in the gravity of hero’s situation, and it works better than you think. Like the title suggests, the movie is an equal mix of comedy and drama. It does a pretty good job of balancing itself between its two elements; while it does not allow itself to be sunk by its depressing side like ‘the disease of the week’ movie, it never forgets that the pain and desperation in the struggle with the disease.

Cancer is certainly not something to laugh about, especially when there is the possibility of your death. However, in case of Adam(Joseph Gordon-Levitt), the life has already put a big joke on him when he gets the cancer diagnosis. He has exercised regularly and cared a lot about what he eats, but he gets a rare spinal cancer. He searches Internet and finds that his recovery/survival chance at the best condition is exactly 50%. It’s terrible, but should he say the glass is half-full, or half-empty?

Adam notifies the other people around him about his diagnosis. Their reactions are not different from what you expect from ordinary people when they hear that kind of news. His mom(Anjelica Huston) wants to help his son, but Adam points out she has her senile husband to take care of. His artist girlfriend Rachel(Bryce Dallas Howard) says she will stand by him. She buys him a dog, which is not recommendable to the patient going through chemotherapy in my knowledge. His best friend Kyle(Seth Rogan) tries to brighten him up. The people at his workplace(he works at some radio broadcast station) tell him how sorry to hear about that, though they are mostly half-sincere.

 He begins his chemotherapy at the hospital, where he meets his fellow cancer patients(Philip Baker Hall and Matt Frewer are delightful as the guys who has been accustomed to their condition and accepted it for a long time). The first day seems okay at first, except he has to spend a long time while the drug is injected into his body. However, the complications from the chemotherapy soon appear. The head gets dizzy, the body feels weaker than before, and there are frequent urges to use the bathroom. I remember how weak one of my aunts looked when she went through her chemotherapy four years ago. My mother, who also went through a hard time with a uterine cancer when I was young, told me later that my aunt ate the lunch prepared by her with gratitude but then went to the bathroom and emptied her stomach.

It becomes harder for Adam. The relationship between him and Rachel gets deteriorated. Eventually, she admits she cannot help him anymore and then moves out of their house. While it cannot be denied that Rachel is a selfish woman, the movie has some pity on her. After all, she is incapable of passing the test she is thrown into. It is pretty hard to move on for cancer patient, but moving along with him/her is not easier than that – it requires a lot more than love.

It turns out his best friend Kyle is the one who stands by and supports Adam. Kyle drags his friend outside of his house because, well, the life may be short. He takes him to the bookstore for buying the books on how to deal with cancer. He also takes his friend to a bar, where the girls show considerable interest to Adam when he says he has cancer. Not far from his previous comic performances and his chubby teddy bear persona, Seth Rogen is both funny and touching. It might help that he knew well about his character, because his character is based on none other than himself. As a matter of fact, on Rogen’s suggestion, the screenplay writer Will Reiser wrote the screenplay based on his difficult experience with cancer, so you see there are lots of authentic aspects in the film.

 Reiser’s story moves back and forth between humor and pain without any sappiness, and so does Joseph Gordon-Levitt. He and Rogen have nice comic chemistry between them; there are many small funny scenes between them such as when Adam decides to shave his head before losing his hair(Gordon-Levitt really shavec his head in front of the camera, by the way). Meanwhile, as the part of cancer therapy, Adam routinely meets a young therapist Katherine(Anna Kendrick), who confesses to him that he is her third patient during their first meeting. It does not take long to realize for both that they are getting closer than they think, and Kendrick and Levitt have warm, sweet moments while they try to be just a therapist and a patient. While both are sensible persons, they can’t hide the fact well that they like each other.

Adam still has the cancer, and he may die. Naturally, the movie is drawn to the area of melodrama around the third act where Adam goes through the most difficult stage in his life. His view on life is certainly changed because of his hard time, and he thinks he can accept his risk, but we all find ourselves helpless and restless before the possibility of our death, and so does he. Fortunately, he struggles with his difficulty while the people who care about him are near him. As the mother who may be overprotective but is deeply concerned about her son’s health state, Anjelica Huston has a good scene with Levitt when they have a brief open-hearted conversation between them.

“50/50” is a funny comedy/drama with lots of heart. It treats its dark subject with respect and authenticity, and, even at its most dour moment, it does not lose any of sense of humor while not trying to push the drama too hard. The death is already approaching to us right after we come into our world, and we are afraid of that because we cannot stop it, but it may be a little better if we have some sense of humor – and the people who can share it with you, along with tear and laugh.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment