Dogtooth (2009) ☆☆☆(3/4) : A family as nutty as North Korea

 When I watched Greek film “Dogtooth” for the first time in early 2010, I thought it was quite a strange film, but now I have some second thoughts after the third watching at last night(The film will be released in South Korean on the next weekend). No, I still do think this is one nutty family, but what recently happened in North Korea made me muse on their behaviors depicted in the film. Living next to one crazy alien society shut down from the world outside, maybe some of our South Korean audiences will not find this film as weird as the other audiences did.

But the family in the film is indeed leading a very strange lifestyle. First, their vocabulary is a little different. For example, they are taught that “Sea” is defined as “a leather armchair.” “Motorway” means “a strong wind”, and “Carbine” is “a beautiful white bird.” As far as I see, the parents only change the definition of several nouns, so they do not have difficulty in communicating with someone from outside – but I wonder what she really means when one of the family members says they will eat burger for dinner.

Living in the big house with a swimming pool in some unknown remote place, this family is shut off from the world outside. They are not only surrounded by the big plants in the garden but also the big, tall fence blocking their view. The family is affluent, and the house is mostly clean, and they do not see any problem with being stuck in this isolated place. They do not watch TV or read newspaper(but they have some books), and only signs of the civilization outside are the planes which fly across the sky above from time to time.

How do they come to have such a bizarre lifestyle? The movie never explains the motive, but it seems that the father initiated this lifestyle probably a long time ago. He is the only one who can go outside with his car(he seems to be the manager of a big plant), so it is his job to supply anything his family needs in their life. He seldom talks about his family in front of other people(he just says that his wife is too ill to meet people), and he blocks anything that may interfere the family life. When he buys foods and water, he painstakingly removes the labels for not giving any outside information. How thoughtful he is.

His wife obeys to him as a good wife(she is physically not ill at all, by the way), and so do their children. They have two daughters and one son. Though they are in late adolescent years, they behave as if they were still little children under the protection of mommy and daddy. They have several strange games to spend their daytime, like “a game of endurance”: they test themselves who can stand longer when they dip their fingers in hot water. In case of their other private game, they anesthetize themselves with chloroform to find out who will wake up first.

They have been leading a good life at least in their view, but it is gradually revealed that something unstoppable is being emerged while their abnormal behaviors, including barking like a dog on their knees when they believe they are threatened by a cat, continue. Though he cannot block everything, the father is determined to stop that by any means necessary, and there are several bursts of violence to shock you mainly due to the clinical, objective attitude of the film.

 The film, which won Un Certain Regard Award at the Cannes Film Festival in 2010 and was nominated for Foreign Language Film Oscar early in this year, has a lot of cold, distant feelings, but it is also interesting and, sometimes, amusing to watch. The director Giorgos Lanthimos, who wrote the screenplay with Efthymis Filippou, keeps everything straight throughout his film with the wry, subtle sense of black humor. The aforementioned twisted vocabulary is used several times in a funny way, and there is also an outrageous scene depicting the way the children celebrate the anniversary of their parent’s wedding. The actors in the film play as seriously as possible to make the twisted reality of their characters mundane – even when they cross the boundary of our ethics out of necessity, they never look self-conscious while supporting the detached tone of the film.

Maybe because of the death of Kim Jong-il two weeks ago and the following response of North Korean people shown on the media, these bizarre human behaviors in the film are not that weird to me as I remembered. I and other South Koreans know too well about how twisted North Korean society have been while shutting up itself from the world and brainwashing its people with the crooked ideas just like the family in the film. One savage scene in the movie reminds me of how severely North Korean people are punished if they are found watching South Korean TV shows.

I remember well when Kim Il-Sung, the former dictator and the father of Kim Jong-il, was dead in 1994. Even we South Koreans were flabbergasted to some degree to see the hysterical mass mourning even though we had been well aware of that he had been literally worshipped as the big daddy of North Korea. Now his son is dead, and his grandson becomes a new leader to be worshipped without much trouble, and we do not find the recent behaviors of North Koreans under this wacky dictatorship particularly weird, mainly because we have seen this before. Compared to this insanity, “Dogtooth” is like a mild fairy tale.

By the way, what is the point of the movie? It does not express its opinion while firmly holding its austere attitude, but I think the lesson from the film is that the kids are bound to grow up no matter how much the parents try to restrict them with their stringent home schooling. Maybe it works for a while, but it cannot last forever. No wonder some North Korean people escape from their country in spite of the constant brainwashing and the possibility of severe punishment.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2009) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4) : Meet original Lisbeth Salander

—- David Fincher’s “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo”(2011) will be released on the second weekend of next January in South Korean theaters. The original Swedish version will be also released in South Korea a week before, so I checked my review on that film which I wrote around late March in 2010, and, as an experiment, I decided to translate the review to post it at my blog. I changed it a little bit because it was written almost two years ago, but I retained what I tried to express in Korean as much as possible. Please feel free to enjoy how clumsy I was even with Korean at that time.

The Swedish film “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo”(In South Korea, it will be released as “Millenium Part I : The Men Who Hate Woman”) is a fabulous film rare to encounter. After the end credit rolled, it was like reading an excellent mystery novel from the beginning to the end while completely involved in the story. As a good mystery, this satisfying adaptation constantly draws out attention; it is compelling to watch how it peel away its mystery step by step to arrive at the truth while carefully establishing its characters, and, above all, there is an unforgettably fascinating heroine as interesting as the case itself.

Mikael Blomkvist(Michael Nyqvist) is a well-known journalist and the editor-in-chief of the magazine named Millenium, but he is now in a big, big trouble. He wrote the article for disclosing the corruption of a powerful business figure in Sweden, and then he was sued for libel and is recently sentenced to not only pay a fine of 150,000 Krona but also spend his time in jail for three months; in the other words, his career as a journalist is nearly ruined. The people around him suggest appeal, but Blomkvist, whose glum face reminds me a lot of the gloominess of Richard Burton, does not want to do that because he is afraid that his downfall may affect his dear magazine.

Then, through a lawyer, he is asked to investigate some unsolved case during the time left to him before going to prison, and he is invited to the manor in some island. His client is none other than Henrik Vanger(Sven-Bertil Taube), who was once a respected CEO but is retired at present.

Henrik has checked Blomkvist in advance to confirm how trustworthy he is, and, under the condition of considerable reward, he entrust him with the investigation of a mysterious case in the past. Forty years ago, his niece, whom he adored like his daughter, was suddenly disappeared, and, based on the evidences gathered through the investigation at that time, she seemed to be vanished in the island while the island was temporarily shut down from the outside due to the accident which happened on the bridge which connects the island and the mainland.


 Henrik has no idea about what happened to his loving niece, but he believes she was murdered, and he thinks the murderer was possibly one of his big family members. He has a good reason for that; when we see some of important family members gathering in the library, it is clear that the Vanger family members can fill at least two or three Agatha Christie novels. Everyone seems to hide something, and some of them are quite greedy, selfish, and despicable. Furthermore, this family has the shady past associated with the Nazism during the World War II.

While residing in the remote house nearby the Vanger manor, Mikael patiently look over the case while trying to get the new clues. Like the people investigating the case did at the time, he soon arrives at the dead end, but one helper surreptitiously approaches to him. She is a young hacker named Lisbeth Salander(Noomi Rapace), and, thanks to her ingenious talent to break the codes, he has a breakthrough in the investigation. Mikael searches for more clues with Lisbeth, and it turns out that their simple case may be only a tip of a far more horrible thing. And, of course, someone is not so pleased about their progression.

Besides the investigation process, the movie also focuses on the details in the characterization in the story. While their paths are slowly overlapped with each other, Mikael and Lisbeth are established as clear, vivid human beings. Especially in case of Lisbeth, who begins to occupy the center of story right from the first appearance, she is a cool, mesmerizing character. With a black leather jacket and the piercing on her cold, detached face, this ice princess is attractive not because she is lovely, but because she is quite compelling in an enigmatic way. She does not like people much(but that does not mean that she does not have interest in sex), and she seems to have vulnerabilities behind her face along with her unhappy past not explained well in the film. None the less, she is certainly not a woman who steps back from a sadistic scumbag who is recently appointed as her new legal guardian. The subplot associated with the disturbing relationship between them seems to be a little too gratuitous at first, but it turns out to be a crucial factor behind her motives in the investigation process.


 In case of investigation process in the film, there is no such a thing like surprise reversal, but it is very entertaining to observe the process. The flashback could have used, but we are instead put in the position same as Mikael and Lisbeth’s while gathering clues and trying to deduce the answer. In one of the impressive moments in the movie, they use the computer software to scan and blow up the images shot at around the time when the incident might happen. Like any detective stories, the moment for the explanation is required, so the film approaches to that famous cliché named “talking villain syndrome”, but I have to say there exist logical reason and situation for that.

I heard that Noomi Rapace prepared a lot before the shooting, and her effort is clearly shown in the film. Because Rapace is so fantastic that she nearly owns the character, like other critics, I have lots of doubts about how they can possibly get the American actress who can substitute Rapace’s singular sexiness for the American remake version currently in pre-production. Sure, Lisbeth is a wonderful character any young talented actress craves for(I heard Kristen Stewart might be considered), but, as Roger Ebert and James Berardinelli pointed out, recruiting Rapace sounds like a better idea. Opposite to Rapace, Michael Nyqvist supports her well while being in the equal position; Mikael may be less clever than Lisbeth, but he is a good investigator with firm, admirable integrity. Sven-Bertil Taube is poignant as an old man who sincerely wants to know the truth; you feel sorry about him and do not like to deliver a bad news to him.


 Though the running time is over 150 minutes, the director Niels Arden Oplev makes a mystery thriller which does not bore you at all. The screen is filled with chilly, remote Scandinavian wintry atmosphere, and the tension level is constantly maintained in the high level. Usually, the hacking technique in movies is too magical to believe, the depiction in this movie is quite realistic to believe – I wonder whether someone is looking at my laptop while I am writing this review. The screenplay by Nikolaj Arcel and Rasmus Heisterbergdoes not hurry; it deftly prepares the ground for the story to tell, and it does a good job of finishing it while announcing the next story to come.

The movie is based on the first novel of the Millenium series written by Stieg Larsson who died years ago while writing the fourth novel(The series has already been published in South Korea, by the way). The next two novels were also adapted for following two sequels. From what I have heard, the response to them was less enthusiastic, but, anyway, “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo” itself is a successful adaptation, and it makes me interested in these sequels. And, yes, I won’t forget that it introduces me a wonderful character and a talented actress to watch.

Sidenote:

  1. After several months after I watched “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo”, I watched those two sequels. Though they were not better than the first film, I enjoyed them all. Noomi Rapace was consistently watchable, and she and her movies were one of the most entertaining things I watched in 2010.

2. I heard Fincher’s film is as good as it can be – and Rooney Mara is very good as the heroine. I know I should be open-minded before watching movies, but I have to admit that I have some expectation at present.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

10 movies of 2011 – and more: part 3

Okay, I also love them, too.

First, there is “Certified Copy”, a light but very engaging movie starring Juliette Binoche and William Shimell; the director Abbas Kiarostami must have been yearning for making this delightful film. And there are two excellent two films from Belgium: “Bullhead”, which was chosen as Belgium’s official submission to the Best Foreign Language Film category of the 84th Academy Awards in 2012 instead of the Darden brothers’ warmer entry “The Kid with a Bike”. Though Lars von Trier behaved like a fool early in this year at the Cannes Film Festival, I admire “Melancholia” a lot.

I was both glad and sad that Harry Porter series finally ended with a bang in “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallow Part 2”, and I was delighted to know that intelligent SF movie is still possible thanks to “Source Code”. I enjoyed “50/50”, a wonderful, balanced mix of comedy and drama, and I still cannot believe the rating of “Life, Above All” is only 6.8 in IMDB – this is a moving drama you cannot miss.

 If you ask me, I’ll say I like them – with my warm 3-star-love.

If there were not much of the films with 3.5 starts, “Hanna” and “Jane Eyre” could be included in my Top 10 list. “Meek’s Cutoff” can be called a “slow film”, but it is rewarding with bleak beauty and the performance of equal bleak beauty by Michelle Williams. While “13 Assassins” is an entertaining Japanese period action film, “Super 8”, “The Rise of the Planet of the Apes”, and “Attack the Block” were a lot more entertaining and intelligent SF films than the gigantic headache called “Transformers 3”.

I also had a good time with interesting small character dramas including “Terri”, “Another Earth”, “Trust”, “Beginners”, “A Better Life”, “Tyrannosaur” and “Margin Call”. “Don’t Be Afraid of Dark” and “Contagion” scared me enough, and “Bridesmaids” tickled me enough, and “Warrior” engaged me enough. I think “The Help” is a little too soft, but I like the performances none the less. Finally, at the end of year, here come good action films – “Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol”, and “Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadow”.

 Special mention

Yes, I watched them in this year and I had a great time with them like you probably did in the last year. I gave 3.5 starts to all of them.

“Another Year”, “Blue Valentine”, “Inside Job”, “127 Hours”, “True Grit”, “The King’s Speech”, and “The Illusionist“.

About documentaries and animations

In case of the documentaries, I have not watched many, but the ones I watched were pretty good ones. First, there is “Bill Cunningham, New York”, a lively documentary about an aging but equally lively fashion photographer who loves his job and will happily die with his job. During late April or early May, I always go to the film festival held at my hometown(Jeon-ju International Film Festival) for watching at least one movie, Werner Herzog’s “Cave of Forgotten Dream” was the one I saw – and it was a good one. “Buck” is a moving documentary about the real-life model of “The Horse Whisperer”(1998) who has a way of connecting with horses despite his abused childhood, and “Tabloid” is about a woman who has a fascinatingly sensational history with elusive sides – this is certainly the most cheerful work from Errol Morris.

In case of Animation, I have to say “Kung Fu Panda 2” was better than I expected and I had a fun time with it. I missed the chance to write about “Rango”, but I can assure you that this is the best animation film of this year. Though it is generic, I enjoyed its bright animation in “Rio”, and I must confess that I am one of few people who are kind to “Cars 2”. Finally, There is “The Adventures of Tintin”, and it is one of enjoyable experiences I had in this month.

In case of South Korean films…

You have probably never heard about them, but if you have a chance to watch any one of them, don’t miss it, folks.  Continue reading →

Posted in Movies | Leave a comment

10 movies of 2011 – and more: part 2

And here are another 5 movies in my list. Continue reading →

Posted in Movies | Leave a comment

10 movies of 2011 – and more: Part 1

Here are my first 5 movies in my list.  Continue reading →

Posted in Movies | 1 Comment

10 movies of 2011 – and more: Introduction

What the adults had told me when I was young turns out to be right: the older you get, the faster the time flies. I will be 29 after about two months, and I can feel that more than ever. Within a minute, I may find myself being 30. They say the average age of the mankind is increasing, but I have lots of regrets about what I failed to do during last 29 years.

As I told you in last year, I have been busy with reconstructing my academic life with what was left with me during this year. Though it was not my idea, I started my research work with based on some idea for my dissertation because there was not much time for me(Don’t worry, the guys providing me an idea have already gotten a diploma and they did not care about that, so they won’t sue me). I made several mistakes during the process, but there have also have been progresses, and the estranged relationship between me and my advisor professor is nearly restored(no, we did not marry), though he is not so sure about what path I will choose after I get a degree.

To be frank with you, I have been blogging in this site while not telling anyone around me about my private activity. I do exactly as the professor tells me in the lab, but I have always managed to find the time for watching movies and writing about some of them which I thought were worthwhile to write about. At least, if I am really busy, I choose to do what I have to do rather than watching movies and writing reviews, and I think that is the improvement for a guy who wrote more than 350 reviews during 2009. Talk about a recovering “movieholic”.

Anyway, I am happy to see that my academic life is restored with some promise and hope. Even when I was enjoying movies in the dark, I was pretty miserable in the light, but the things are getting better now. If I try harder, I will be able to present the proposal for my thesis during the next semester, and then I will submit my dissertation later around next winter. Then maybe I can attend 2013 Ebertfest if the situation is good for me and I can persuade my parents.

2011 is a good year for the moviegoers like as usual, and I enjoyed writing the reviews on the films directed by Danny Boyle, the Coen Brothers, Darren Aronofsky, Alejandro Jodorowsky, David O. Russell, Clint Eastwood, Mike Leigh, Werner Herzog, Barbet Schroeder, Abbas Kiarostmai, Joe Dante, Hong Sang-soo, Steven Soderbergh, Alejandro González Iñárritu, Terrence Malick, Brad Bird, Steven Spielberg, and other new exciting films. I have not watched “Hugo”, “Shame”, “Take Shelter”, “The Artist”(it will be released here around February), “The Descendants” (it will also be released here around February), “Martha Marcy May Marlene”, “Carnage”, “Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy”, “Kinyarwanda”, “The Guard”(I am going to watch it in this week), “We Need to Talk about Kevin”(I am going to watch it tonight), and the remake version of “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo”(It will be released here around early January). I will probably watch them soon, and I will mention them in the special section reserved for them if I like them.

Posted in Movies | Leave a comment

Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows (2011) ☆☆☆(3/4) : Dr. Watson’s honeymoon is postponed

When I watched “Sherlock Holmes”(2009) almost two years ago, I wondered whether it was good to inject the seven percent solution of caffeine/adrenaline to one of the most famous detectives in the English literature. I enjoyed its style, moods, and wits provided by its two lead actors, but I did not recommend the film with my 2.5 star rating due to my little dissatisfaction and following reservation gnawing on me: is it acceptable to make Sherlock Holmes into a comic book action hero who can use not only his brain but also his muscle?

Fortunately, the director Guy Ritchie, who directed previous Sherlock Holmes movie, proves that was not a bad thing after all in this smooth sequel. Maybe it is still a little distracting to watch Holmes to use his body besides his brilliant mind to solve his case, but this sequel shows several improvements while retaining what made the previous test run enjoyable to watch. It is grittier and more bombastic(thanks to Hans Zimmer’s aggressively egoistic score), but, the game is afoot, and it is fun to watch Holmes’ another adventure.

When we meet again our faithful chronicler Dr. John Watson(Jude Law), he is just beginning to type his latest story to tell. Europe is continuously disrupted by the serial bombings and other disturbing incidents across the continent, and they are assumed to be perpetrated by a group of anarchists, but Sherlock Holmes(Robert Downey Jr.) has the other idea about what is going on. Shut himself in his residence in a rather hilarious way, he concentrates on literally linking the dots on the wall, and he knows who is behind all these happenings around the world.

 He is the Professor James Moriarty, played by seemingly suave and courteous Jared Harris. On the surface, he is a well-respected professor in Cambridge well connected with several influential politicians including the Prime Minster(his recent famous book: “The Dynamics of an Asteroid”), but he is also a manipulative criminal mastermind with an insidious plan for the future. He is not so pleased when Holmes starts meddling with his private business; Holmes recently succeeds in intercepting a certain letter to be delivered by Irene Adler(Rachel McAdams), who was once romantically involved with him, and Moriarty, her current employer, is naturally very, very disappointed about his employee’s failure.

The letter is addressed to a gypsy lady named Madam Simza Heron(Noomy Rapace, who was quite electrifying in the Swedish version of “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo”(2009)) who works as a fortune teller in one brothel in London. Because Watson is going to get married, he is unwittingly dragged by Holmes to that place for “a stag party”, and, though he managed to get married to his fiancée Mary(Kellly Reily) on the next day, we know that our dear doctor’s honeymoon is soon postponed due to a personal reason and poor Mrs. Watson will be waiting for his husband to return – at least we know she will be relieved in the end.

The director Guy Ritchie uses the same bag of tricks we have observed from his previous films, but he is more assured than in his previous Holmes film. Again, he uses that alternating slow and fast motions with choppy rhythms to depict the action sequences, and they are as exciting as before while giving interestingly gritty working class sensibility to the exemplary production designs and costumes for the 19th century background. The situation is more dangerous than before for the characters; not only they race against the time to thwart Moriarty’ evil scheme to ignite the war between conflicting European countries, but also they have to run for their life amid the shells relentlessly falling from the sky. Besides that gloomy London of the late 19th century we all are familiar with, there are various sceneries to be appreciated while Holmes and others move around Europe, including the castle placed on the top of the waterfall among those steep mountains in Switzerland.

 In any action movies, the success mostly depends on how menacing the villain is, and Jared Harris does a good job as the evil genius ahead of his time. As an equal match for Holmes, Moriarty is a cool, calm, and calculating villain who rarely loses his posture even when it is evident that the battle of wits is almost over. It is fascinating to see how their minds work in a pretty much same way in one scene where Holmes and Moriarty try to outsmart each other on the chess board while their respective strategies are working from the distance.

As the title character, Robert Downey Jr. is having a fun while playing a guy who is definitely not your ideal roommates especially if you have a dog. While he is believable as a tough guy who can quickly knock down a bunch of menacing thugs in a short time thanks to his fast thinking, Downey seldom loses his sardonic wits as an intelligent crime solver amid the rapid actions. Opposite to Downey, Jude Law is enjoyable as a straight man who endures his friend a lot even after he leaves the Baker street. Watson wants a normal life with marriage, but, alas, he is always somehow hurled into his disagreeable friend’s adventures, regardless of whether he wants it or not.

The newly added supporting characters are also fun to watch, too, and maybe they will come back in the next film. As an equally eccentric older brother of Holmes, Stephen Fry has his own moment when he walks around being completely naked. Considering her talent, Noomy Rapace does not have many things to do besides moving along with Downey and Law, but she is completely different from Lisbeth Salander in this film, and she shows us that she can hold her place while delivering English dialogues well – I think she can move on for better opportunities on the horizon.

Overall, “Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadow” is a more engaging movie than the previous film because of several improved aspects. The story is still shaky in many spots, but the characters and the styles are entertaining enough to float the story. While expressing my reservation, I concluded my Korean review of “Sherlock Holmes” with saying that they would make a good sequel if they did the things right in the next time. I am glad that they did.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Perfect Game (2011) ☆☆☆(3/4) : The Clash of the Pitchers

 “Perfect Game”, the latest South Korean baseball film, has plenty of the baseballs to pitch to the audiences. Some are balls and they do not work, but I have to admit that there are also lots of strikes that managed to get me involved in the story it tries to tell. This sports drama throws its balls with diligence and honesty till the end credit rolls, and it earns its  finale which most of its target audiences are well aware of.

Because I am not a baseball fan, I do not know much about one of legendary matches in South Korean baseball history the movie is based on(I was four at that time), and neither do you, perhaps. On May 16, 1987, two famous Korean pitchers, Choi Dong-won and Seon Dong-ryeol, ferociously competed with each other in their final game to be enshrined by ardent Korean baseball fans. The former was an established star pitcher, and the latter was a rising star pitcher. They had been constantly compared with each other at that time, so the clash between these two talented pitchers was inevitable, and the time had finally come for them when they were chosen as the main pitcher in their respective teams.

The first half of the film is about the situation and the people surrounding this match. With its pumped-up score and the utmost serious attitude of the people populating the screen, it is like watching an epic war film version of sports drama movie. Besides Choi Dong-won and Seon Dong-ryeol, there are also other team players, the team managers, the team owners, the government officials, the eager reporters busy with talking about them or bombarding them with lots of questions, and, above all, the zealous baseball fans cheering for their teams. I have no idea about how they really were during the 1980s, but I have to say South Korean baseball fans depicted in this film scared me a lot due to its vivid presentation of them. Outside or inside the field, they are so aggressive and violent that they make British hooligans look like the Red Cross volunteers. I wonder – do they remain same as before even at the 21th century?

 Though it does not dig deep into it while busying itself with lots of materials, the movie makes a small, interesting point about how the South Korean government at that time was involved with South Korean sports world. It was a turbulent time when the demand for democracy from South Korean people was increasing day by day, and the government used the entertainment and sports to distract the people from the politics. It seemed to work at first, but the government did not succeed in the end. The people had indeed a fun time as shown in the movie, but they forgot very little about the dictatorship oppressing them, so the government began to step back only a month after the big match between Choi Dong-won and Seon Dong-ryeol.

While the movie starts literally gathering the storm before the game, the buzz surrounding these two players keeps being heightened. Though they are rivals, Choi Dong-won and Seon Dong-ryeol were like brothers during their early career. The rivalry certainly exists between them, but both have respect and admiration toward each other. They do not particularly want to play against each other, but the situation pushes them to the showdown everyone around them has longed for, and both know that they do their best no matter what will happen in the field.

Though it sets to be the recreation of the real-life incident, but the movie is more like a generic sports drama due to lots of its melodramatic devices. The most blatant element in the story is an aging catcher named Man-su(amiable Ma Dong-seok) who has never gotten the chance to walk into the field. His wife is frustrated about him, mainly because he has been not much of help to his financially struggling family(Being a baseball team member does not always guarantee an affluent life, you know). His young son is not so proud of his dad who has never appeared on TV, though he wants to grow up like his hero, Seon Dong-ryeol. In such a setting like this, when do you think Man-su will get the chance of his lifetime? Do I spoil your fun if I say he does not let down his family as well as his team at the eleventh hour?

And what about a female reporter named Seo-hyeong, played by Choi Jeong-won? I understand that the movie wants to explain lots of things to the audiences like me who have a little knowledge on South Korean baseball, but Choi Jeong-won is wasted in a role as thankless as the female characters in those old World War II films. Except the scenes giving us the basic information, the movie does not know what to do with this functionary character. During the finale, I wanted to ask her: “Why the hell are you wandering around here, ma’am?”

As a consequence, the movie looks more like a fiction, and Choi Dong-won and Seon Dong-ryeol look like the stereotypes rather than the real-life figures. However, thanks to the strong, unpretentious performances by Jo Seung-woo and Yang Dong-geun, who do not feel any urge to imitate their real-life counterparts, they grow on us as the characters we root for; we like them both and we want both of them to win. Fortunately, their sports is baseball, so some of you know such a thing is possible in this case.

When the game eventually begins, the movie is more focused and intense then before with increasing power. Their final match was not the longest baseball game in the world record, but think about this: they did pitch the balls for nearly five hours throughout 15 innings without being replaced. The shoulders are hurting, the fingers are bleeding, the bodies are exhausted, but both of them cannot step back in this ultimate test for their talent and endurance. The movie rarely loses the grip on us throughout this long game, and it was sometimes exhausting for me to watch, but I also felt that the characters were far more exhausted on the screen.

Although there are flaws which could have been easily excised for more improvement, “Perfect Game” is a good, if not perfect, sports drama. The director/writer Park Hee-gon makes a competent product with the sincere nostalgia toward to the match to be remembered. I am sure there are lots of people who can respond to his film more emotionally than me, but that does not mean that the younger audiences born after the 1980s cannot enjoy this entertaining film. This is a good match to behold.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Le Havre (2011) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4) : A small tale in one French port city

It is now late December, and it is getting colder here in South Korea. The shabby arthouse theater I visited in the last evening was a cold place with a very few audiences at that time(Besides me, there were only four audiences), and the theater manager even offered us the blankets, but it was okay for me at least, because watching “Le Havre” was a small warm experience that has grown on me since I left the theater late at that night.

The director Aki Kaurismäki’s films are so dry that I may only describe the characters and their situations if I try to talk about his movies in my writing – and I might get away with my delinquency. His deadpan approach is so simple that you probably do not understand why it is funny until you see it for yourself. For instance, one character in his new film “Le Havre” buys a certain fruit in the middle of the story, and then he walks into the bar to have some conversation with a bar owner. The camera does nothing except simply observes the man sitting on one of the tables and the fruit placed on the table right next to him, but it somehow made me smile.

Kaurismäki’s films are usually set in the urban area of Finland, and his unhappy characters are stuck in hard time while yearning for the escape from the ennui and dreariness of their daily life, as shown in “Shadows in Paradise”(1986) and “Ariel”(1988). But this time, it is a little different. Set in Le Havre, a French port city in Normandy, he presents us a middle-aged couple content with their poor lifestyle and happy to be together – and he makes a movie warmer and more accessible than before.

Marcel(André Wilms) is a shoeshine living in Le Havre(I am curious – how many cities in the world are called “The Harbor”?). He moves around the different places in the city for earning money, but it is not so easy for him to work on these days(the opening scene made me to be conscious about what I was wearing on my feet). While watching him working, I thought he would envy the shoeshines I saw in Seoul, who usually occupy the booths on the streets as their workplace for doing other things besides polishing the shoes. I remember that I once needed my shoes to be polished as soon as possible when I was about to attend the lab colleague’s wedding; I went into one of those booths, and the guy did a marvelous job with my old shoes I seldom wore.

Anyway, let’s get back to the film itself. Marcel does not earn money much, but there is always the place waiting for him whenever the day is over. There are his good working-class neighbours, including the bakery owner who demands Marcel to pay off his accumulating bill while well aware of that he will probably never do that. He tells her he will pay it all when a good chance comes(he mentions about “the inheritance” of his wife), but it is a lie, and both know that. The grocery shop owner across the alley chooses a more direct way – he shuts down the store instantly when Marcel walks to the store, though, as we learn later, he is a nice man, after all.

Marcel was once a free-living bohemian who wanted to be a writer when he was young, but now he is settled with his wife Arletty(Kati Outinen – do you remember her far younger self in “Shadows in Paradise” and “The Match Factory Girl”(1990)?) and their dog Laika in their shabby house. We do not know much about how they met in the past(I guess they started as “the best roommates”), but the low-key performances of Wilms and Outinen succinctly conveys us a dry but loving relationship between them.

Meanwhile, a group of illegal immigrants from Gabon, who tried to go to London, are found by the police at one of those huge containers at the port after locked in there for days due to their bad luck. One of them, a boy named Idrissa(Blondin Miguel), manages to escape. When he goes to the riverside to have a lunch, Marcel comes across him hiding from the police. He gives Idrissa the food later, and Marcel soon finds himself taking care of him at his house while the newspapers make a big fuss about this shy, quiet, and nice boy.

Marcel does more than that to help Idrissa. He goes to Calais to find and meet Idrissa’s grandfather who was with him in that container. He even concocts a secret plan to send Idrissa to London where Idrissa’s mother lives. While Marcel is absent, Idrissa can take care of himself well, and Laika, who deserves to appear with others in the movie poster, is always near him.

 Marcel’s neighbours also help him, too. Except one petty guy(Jean-Pierre Léaud – remember Antoine Doinel in “400 Blows”(1959)?), his neighbours do not tell anything to the police. Captain Monet(Jean-Pierre Darroussin, very serious with a black suit, a black coat, black shoes, black gloves, and a black hat) seems to be determined to do his job, but Darroussin gives us a subtle hint that Monet does not like what he has to do. Monet can be flexible, and the loose suspense of the film depends on how much flexible he can be.

While Marcel is busy with helping Idrissa, Arletty is in the hospital. She knows she has been ill, and she hides that from her husband, but she can’t hide it from him any more now, except that her days can be counted. She is sent to the hospital early in the film, so she does not know much about what is going around her husband, but, when Idrissa comes to her at the hospital to deliver the message from her husband, she accepts the message from the boy she barely knows. Outinen expresses little in the face, but this scene is one of the warmest spots in the film along with its charming soundtrack. Later in the story, there is an illegal concert promoted by Marcel and his Vietnamese colleague(Quoc Dung Nguyen) to gather the money for helping Idrissa, and a singer named Little Bob(Roberto Piazza) gets a little showstopper moment with his live performance.

“Le Havre”, which received the FIPRESCI Prize at the Cannes film festival early in this year, is probably the sweetest film directed by Kaurismäki. At the end of the film, something unbelievable happens, but we can accept it as much as the other realistic parts of the story. As one South Korean critics once said, a good fairy tale does not come from nowhere; it comes from the reality, and, in its own droll way, “Le Havre” provides the hard reality to make that the small miracle in the film more precious and real. The story is brighter than his previous works, but Kaurismäki does not lose any edge of his deadpan humor and the cold, harsh reality inside it – that is the main reason why this small, sweet, and warm mug of hot cocoa feels warmer than I thought.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol (2011) ☆☆☆(3/4) : Back in another incredible mission

Three weeks ago, I had to endure a new Twilight movie at the local theater on Sunday evening, but I got a much better thing before being suffered by that tepid Harlequin romance about not-so-scary vampires and werewolves: the promotional video clip for the new movie “Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol”. I am sure they were very careful about the star’s safety when they shot the scene, but I must confess that I winced while watching Cruise do that dangerous stunt around the top of the Burj Khalifa building, which is at present the highest building in the world.

So, I came to get the excellent standard with which I can appreciate the film itself, and I could ask this question – is the film as thrilling as that video clip? The answer is yes, and “Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol” is better than we can expect in the time when we are sort of tired of this endless parade of the sequels nowadays.

Actually, the movie is better than the previous installments in the series with noticeable improvements. Besides that sequence involved with the Burj Khalifa, the film has other impressive action scenes, and it also manages to be humorous and goofy while Ethan Hunt and his team members are trying to stop the bad guys with a nefarious plot. Though the world may meet the end at any chance, we are in a safe fun ride, aren’t we?

The plot of the movie is more or less than the coat hanger for the series of the action adventure sequences, so let’s make it brief. Our hero Ethan Hunt(Tom Cruise, of course) is recently given a new mission in Moscow for him and his team members, but it turns out to be the trap set by the villain of the film. As a result, they are framed for the huge bombing at the Kremlin, and their agency, IMF, is quickly shut down due to Ghost Protocol initiated by the American President. Hunt and his team are left with nothing to protect themselves except the limited amount of the resources given to them by the IMF director played by Tom Wilkinson.

 Hunt and others decide to do something in this tight situation – find the guy responsible for their troubles and prevent him from achieving his manic goal, which is none other than the World War III to wipe out the human civilization on the earth for the new beginning. He is a mad strategist named Hendricks, played by Michael Nyqvist from the Swedish version of “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo”(2009). Nyqvist does an adequate job as the villain who can be fully explained and established within few minutes in a short message from IMF, which is, as usual, automatically incinerated few seconds after the message is delivered to the receiver.

The movie serves us the various colorful locations around the world along with the different moods and terrific action sequences for each. I am sure that some of the shots are CGIs, but that thrilling sequence unfolded at the Burj Khalifa feels real to me, and it is certainly more cringe-inducing to me than the promotional clip. While watching Cruise climbing on the glass windows of this tall building is a suspenseful experience, I was constantly unnerved by the absence of one window glass at his team’s room around the 110th floor. You should be very careful in that room especially when you start to fight with your opponent, or…… ugh.

The actions sequences helped a lot by CGIs are equally entertaining, too. There is a car chase sequence associated with a sudden weather incident, and it is both rapid and tense though we and Hunt do not see much from the outside. And we also have the action scene featuring a huge parking garage where parked cars are constantly moved here and there around two characters fighting to the death for grabbing a very important object.

Tom Cruise, called endearingly “Uncle Tom” in South Korea, is approaching to 50, but he does not lose any of his star quality – and he remains as a likable action hero as he was when the first Mission impossible movie was released in 1996. He previously did a memorably risky stunt at the opening sequence of “Mission: Impossible 2”(2000), and now he outdoes himself with this film. I have no idea about what he thought or felt while doing his stunts, but I admire his commitment to his profession.

And the movie comes more close to the teamwork spirit of the original TV series. Though Cruise is the star and the leader in the film, Cruise never overshadows his co-actors who are also having a fun while convincing us that they are doing perilous missions they must do no matter what. Simon Pegg, who appeared briefly in “Mission: Impossible 3”(2006), is a computer expert who finds himself doing more than handling his laptop as a newly added field agent. Paula Patton is lovely as the agent deft at both fighting with a deadly enemy and seducing a clueless target, and Jeremy Renner is a “special analyst” who is, not so surprisingly, more than what he seems to be on the surface. We understand and smile at them when they fumble or hesitate a little when they work. Thank God I do not have to throw myself toward the huge fan which may shred my body – even when the peace of the world is at the stake, I will definitely hesitate to do that for a long, long time.

The movie is directed by Brad Bird, a talented animation director made the wonderful animations such as “The Iron Giant”(1999), “The Incredibles”(2004), and “Ratatouille”(2007). Whether he is also a good live action director or just a hired hand in the production is debatable, but he definitely makes a good debut; this is a smooth, handsome production filled with lots of excitements and thrills worthy of your ticket price. Right after watching this movie with me, my lab colleague told me that he though the running time was 1.5 hours. Considering the running time was actually more than 2 hours, that’s a really good compliment, you know.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | 1 Comment