Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu (2026) ☆☆(2/4): A mediocre special episode

I must say this right now: “Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu” is the most tepid Star Wars flick since “Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker” (2019). Thoroughly uninspired and mediocre from the beginning to the end, the movie simply trudges from one expected narrative point to another without much sense of joy and wonder for us, and we are only consoled a bit by a very few moments of fun pasted onto it.

Yes, I know that the movie is sort of encore to the Disney+ TV series “The Mandalorian”, and, considering that I have not watched any episode from that TV series, I may not be an ideal audience for the film. However, even though I was willing to open my mind from the very beginning, the movie turned out to be no more than a very expensive and superficial special episode, and I do not think the fans of the TV series would complain much even if it went straight to Disney+ instead.

One of the main problems of the movie is that it takes its two titular characters for granted a bit too much. If you have not watched the TV series at all just like me, there is almost nothing for you to get any substantial understanding on the strong relationship between “the Mandalorian”, who is also known as Din Djarin (Pedro Pascal), and his little cute alien ward named Grogu, and they will just come to you as mere plot elements to roll from one narrative point to another. Perhaps, I should have watched the entire TV series first, but, folks, life has already been too short for me since I passed 40 a few years ago.

Therefore, I tried to enjoy the technical aspects of the film instead during my viewing, but, alas, director/co-director/co-writer Jon Favreau, who wrote the screenplay with Dave Filoni and Noah Kloor, does not try that much as merely being on autopilot mode. In terms of mood and details, the movie looks so visually flat and bland on the whole that I got frequently bored instead of becoming genuinely engaged and enchanted, and, the worst of all, the performers in the film often do not feel like inhabiting its backgrounds at all.

For example, just look at the main background of the first half of the story, which mainly revolves around the Mandalorian’s attempt to rescue the young son of that infamous alien villain character in “Star Wars: Return of the Jedi” (1983). When The Mandalorian and Grogu arrive at a big city on some alien planet, we are instantly disappointed as the city does not have much style and personality except looking quite drab and dark on the screen, and the only saving grace in this passable background comes from a little cameo appearance by Martin Scorsese, who is surely as talky as you can expect from him.

During its second half, which has the Mandalorian and Grogu get into a big serious trouble after they did the right thing for that alien lad in question, the movie shows some potential as introducing a number of different alien figures and creatures, but it lets us down again without anything new or fresh to impress us. Things get a little more interesting around the narrative point where an alien figure warmly played by Stephen McKinley Henderson appears, but, just like many other things in the story, this part is quickly discarded as the movie hurriedly moves its two main characters to the next narrative point.

Sure, there is a bit of cuteness thanks to Grogu, who is a small, adorable version of Yoda in the Star Wars flicks and is vividly presented on the screen via animatronics and puppetry augmented with visual effects. I and many other audiences were certainly charmed by this little likable alien character, and I was amused a bit whenever I watched Grogu doing some cute stuffs, but that is all we can get from this alien character, and the movie unsurprisingly uses Grogu as a convenient plot device more than once along the story.

In case of Pedro Pascal, who has been one of the reliable actors working in Hollywood during last several years. I can only tell you that he did a fairly good job of filling his role with enough presence and a bit of personality even though we do not see much of his face throughout the film. He and Grogu are mostly convincing as an odd duo to watch, but the movie does not give them enough space for more character development as often being busy with throwing them into more action along the story.

And the action scenes of the film are not particularly good or memorable in my inconsequential opinion. Unless he has to do some physical actions, the Mandalorian, who is incidentally one of the best bounty hunters in the galaxy, shoots here and there, and many of those bad guys (and aliens and robots) in the film are always shot down within a few seconds with no surprise for us at all. In case of the expected climactic sequence, the last-minute appearance of those X-wing pilots of the New Republic led by none other than Sigourney Weaver feels like being tacked onto that just for more bangs and crashed across the screen, but some of you may be a bit entertained by the very short cameo appearances of Deborah Chow, Paul Sun-Hyung Lee, Rick Famuyiwa, and Lee Isaac Chung (How nice it is to see Chung again after meeting him in person at the 2010 Ebertfest more than 15 years ago….).

Overall, “Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu” dissatisfied me for its numerous weak aspects, and I must tell you that it actually made me less curious about the TV series. As writing the last paragraph of this review, I remember less of whatever I saw from the movie, and my mind is already ready to move onto anything better than this lackadaisical product.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Pilgrims (2025) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4): Why do they never return?

South Korean independent animation film “Pilgrims” presents a little science fiction tale which could do more in my trivial opinion. While it is fairly competent in technical aspects, the movie feels rather flat and colorless in terms of story and character, and I observed it from the distance instead of caring more about the story and characters.

The film, which is based on South Korean science fiction writer Kim Cho-yeop’s short story “Why Do Pilgrims Never Return?”, begins with the introduction of a little utopia world outside the Earth. Every member of this world is incidentally female, and they all have lived together happily and harmoniously while mostly being away from most of those intense human emotions as reflected by one school lesson scene early in the story.

The elder members of this community diligently follow their quasi-religious belief originated from the legendary founder of their community, and one of their main tasks is handling a certain big annual ritual. All of the young members in this world must embark on a one-year pilgrimage to the Earth at the age of 18, and there is a space shuttle which takes the latest pilgrims to the Earth after taking back the returning ones from the Earth.

However, not all of the pilgrims sent to the Earth return, and a girl named Daisy (voiced by Park Ji-hu) begins to wonder what happened to those pilgrims who did not return from the Earth. One of those non-returning pilgrims happens to be a close friend of hers, so Daisy decides to go inside the space shuttle instead of greeting those returning pilgrims along with her other close friend Sophie (voiced by Kim Hyang-gi).

Some time later, we see Sophie going through another nice day along with many other girls around her age. She somehow does not remember much of Daisy, so she is quite baffled when Daisy suddenly attempts to correspond with her via a little object given to her in advance. After arriving at a big futuristic city on the Earth, Daisy had to go through some tough moments, and she certainly misses Sophie more than ever, though Sophie still cannot remember a lot of their friendship.

It is not much of a spoiler to tell you that both Sophie and Daisy come to realize that their utopian world is actually closely linked with the dystopian society of that big futuristic city. Many people in the city have been unjustly discriminated just because of being genetically “natural”, and some of them including that old friend of Daisy have been ruthlessly hunted by the system for showing defiant resistance against it.

Yes, this is a very typical science fiction story setup, and Kim’s short story probably brings some style and detail to its familiar story premise, but the film is often shallow and deficient in both style and substance. While we get some glimpses into that big futuristic city, it simply remains as a merely oppressive background without enough interesting stuffs to intrigue us, and it also fails to establish engaging characters to hold our attention. While we are supposed to care more about the emotional bond between Sophie and Daisy along the story, they are no more than broad archetypes without enough personality or spirit, and the story also does not flesh out that old friend of Daisy enough, who are more or less than a tool for some plot exposition.

In addition, the voice cast members of the film are usually flat and strained to my disappointment. While Kim Hyang-gi and Park Ji-hu are undeniably talented actresses (Kim recently gave a terrific lead performance in “Hallan” (2025), and I still fondly remember Park’s unforgettable breakthrough turn in “House of Hummingbird” (2019)), their voice performances occasionally show some distracting awkwardness, and they also do not generate much chemistry between their respective parts.

I must point out that director Heo Pyoung-kang had a fair share of animation filmmaking experience before making her directorial feature film debut here. During last two decades, she participated in the production of a number of notable Japanese animation TV series and films ranging from “Night is Short, Walk on Girl” (2017) to “Detective Conan: Zero the Enforcer” (2018), and that is quite evident from the cell animation style of “Pilgrims”, which is not so far from that of many Japanese animation TV series and films out there. As far as I can see, she is a well-experienced animation filmmaker with considerable potential, though the film still feels like a mere test run before whatever may come next from her.

In conclusion, “Pilgrims” does not satisfy me enough during its rather short running time (60 minutes), but I admire it to some degree as another recent South Korean animation to notice. Although South Korean animation industry has been a lot less distinguished compared to the monumental status of the Japanese animation industry for many years, I and South Korean audiences watched a series of small but notable local works such as “Mother Land” (2023), “Exorcism Chronicle: The Beginning” (2024), and “The Square” (2025) during last several years, and they and “Pilgrim” will probably lead to more success and achievement in South Korean animation in the future.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Backrooms (2026) ☆☆☆(3/4): A creepy labyrinth of backrooms

“Backrooms” is a modest but effective horror flick mainly driven by mood and idea, and I like that enough. While the movie is inherently a bit too simple in terms of story and characters, it is still interesting to observe how the movie expands its oddly nightmarish background across the screen step by step, and the result is one of the more interesting genre films of this year in my inconsequential opinion.

How it was developed is as fascinating as the movie itself. It is based on director Kane Parsons’s web series which was started a few years ago, and this was inspired by the “Backrooms” creepypasta on the imageboard website 4chan in 2019. The latter was initially just a series of images of empty rooms looking rather odd and disquieting, but these images led to the creation of an imaginary world full of such spaces thanks to numerous online users out there, and that was the starting point for Parsons’s web series, which is presented as a series of low-quality video clips supposedly shot inside this weird fictional world.

In case of the movie version, the screenplay by Will Soodik adds more substance to the original concept. At first, the movie, which is incidentally set around the 1990s, introduces a furniture store owner named Clark (Chiwetel Ejiofor), and the early part of the story quickly establishes how much he has struggled in both his work and personal life. While his furniture store has not been so successful to say the least, his wife recently left due to their estranged relationship, and he also has a serious drinking problem.

At least, Clark has a regular session with his therapist, but it turns out that his therapist, Mary (Renate Reinsve), has her own personal issue behind her phlegmatic appearance. She often finds herself haunted by her painful childhood memories involved with her mentally disturbed mother, but there is nothing she can do except maintaining her cool professional appearance in front of others as usual.

Meanwhile, Clark comes to discover something odd in his store on one day. In the basement of the store, there is a hidden portal to a dimension of seemingly endless liminal spaces, and he becomes more curious about that as exploring here and there in this weird hidden world. He subsequently has his two employees joining his exploration with a video camera, and that is where the movie overlaps with Parsons’s web series to some degree. As Clark and his two employees delve into this alien world more and more, we see more of strange things to baffle or disturb us, and the rough texture of low-definition video generates some verisimilitude to engage us more.

Needless to say, it does not take much time for Clark and the two other characters to realize that something dangerous is lurking somewhere in this strange world. Wisely not showing much of whatever is menacing them, the movie deftly generates the sense of dread around the screen, and we get all the more unnerved thanks to its dexterous sound design and the ambient electronic score by Parsons and his co-composer Edo Van Breemen.

Above all, Parsons deftly expands his genre playground more and more along the story. Around the narrative point where Clark’s psychiatrist also enters that strangely labyrinthic world, we get more of those weird liminal spaces, and the movie has a wry fun with that before culminating to an intense moment which somehow reminded me of both “The Texas Chain Saw Massacre” (1974) and “The Shining” (1980).

The movie stumbles a bit when it later brings a character played by Mark Duplass mainly for a bit of explanation and ventilation, but that is not much of a problem thanks to Parsons’s competent direction. Despite his rather young age (He is soon going to have his 21st birthday a few weeks later, by the way), he got the full support from his producers including James Wan and Osgood Perkins, and he demonstrates well here that he is a promising talented filmmaker who knows how to engage us via mood and details. Considering the critical/commercial success of the movie at present, he will soon move onto whatever he wants to make next, and it will be interesting to see whether he will advance further from his commendable result here in this movie.  

I also appreciate how deftly Parsons draws the interesting performances from his two dependable lead performers. Chiwetel Ejiofor, a wonderful British actor who has seldom disappointed us since his breakout turn in “Dirty Pretty Things” (2002), subtly conveys to us his character’s despair and frustration, and that is the main reason why a certain crucial moment of his later in the story works. Renate Reinsve, a compelling Norwegian actress who becomes more prominent after her unforgettable performance in “The Worst Person in the World” (2021), holds the other part of the film well, and her good performance brings some human qualities to the movie as much as Ejiofor’s.

On the whole, “Backrooms” is a solid genre work to be admired for its several strong aspects including mood and performance. Even if you do not know that much about Parsons’s web series or the “Backrooms” creepypasta, you will be intrigued and then entertained by its distinctive artistic qualities, and then you may want to check on Parsons’s web series currently available on YouTube. This is surely a good starting point for Parsons, and I think we can have some expectation on his burgeoning filmmaking career.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Romería (2025) ☆☆☆(3/4): Getting to know about her dead parents

Spanish filmmaker Carla Simón‘s latest film “Romería” is about an adolescent girl getting to know more about her dead parents right before entering her adult life. While it initially looks like a typical mix between family drama and coming-of-age tale, the movie fills the screen with a lot of distinctive sensitivity and realism as its heroine comes to learn more about her parents along the story, and we do not mind at all even when it delves into a realm of fantasy for a while later in the story.

The movie is pretty much like a spiritual sequel to Simón’s previous film “Summer 1993” (2017), which is about a little young girl coping with her changed situation due to the early death of her parents. Just like that movie, “Romería”, which is incidentally set in a Spanish port city named Vigo during several days of July 2004, has autobiographical elements from Simón’s early life, and that is quite evident to us whenever its young heroine records a lot of things with her digital video camera in the film.

At the beginning, the movie gradually establishes young heroine’s purpose of visit to Vigo. Before Marina (Llúcia Garcia) was born in the late 1980s, her parents lived together in the city for a while, but they became separated from each other around the time of Marina’s birth, and both of them eventually died not long after that. Marina was subsequently raised by her mother’s family members in Barcelona, but now she needs to be recognized on her father’s death certificate for her upcoming scholarship application, and this requires some legal help from her father’s family.

Although she has never met them before, most of her father’s family members cordially welcome Marina right from her first day in Vigo. One of her uncles gladly lets her stay in his family boat along with his several family members, and it does not take much time for Marina to get friendly with her several cousins including Nuno (Mitch Martín). At one point early in the story, she enjoys some free time along with her cousins in the sea, and it looks like she will have a pretty good time in Vigo while eventually getting what she needs from her father’s family.

Meanwhile, she also becomes all the more curious about how her parents lived in the city during that time. Fortunately for her, Marina happens to have an old diary from her mother, and her mother’s diary comes to function as a sort of guidebook for her. She visits an old apartment building where her parents once resided, but a lot of things have gone or changed since that, and she cannot find anyone remembering her parents there.

In case of her father’s family members, they are mostly casual in their conversations with Marina, but it is apparent that her father and his death have been a skeleton in the closet even though Marina knows a bit about what caused her parents’ death. When she subsequently meets her paternal grandmother, she is not very nice to Marina to say the least, and her paternal grandfather prefers to pay all of Marina’s college tuition rather than getting her officially recognized on his son’s death certificate.

Nevertheless, Marina gets to know about her parents bit by bit as spending more time with her father’s family members. While they did love each other a lot, her parents’ romantic relationship was eventually deteriorated by their pretty wild lifestyle filled with a lot of drug and alcohol, and that was followed by a grim period about which many of her father’s family members are still not so willing to talk to Marina.

I must say that I have no idea on how much the story overlaps with Simón’s real-life story, but she did a good job of imbuing the movie with considerable verisimilitude to draw our attention. Although it takes some time for us to discern the family relationships among Marina and a bunch of other characters surrounding her, they come to us as realistic human figures to observe thanks to the natural interactions among the main cast members of the film, and we accordingly become more engaged in Marina’s personal quest along the story.  

When Marina comes to experience a mixture of fantasy and memory later in the story, this feels a bit too jarring at first, but the movie keeps holding our attention as freely moving across a series of personal memories associated with Marina’s parents. Regardless of what exactly happens to her at that point, we come to sense considerable emotional maturation from our young heroine, and that is why the last scene comes with genuine poignancy.

Simón also draws good performances from her main cast members. While newcomer Llúcia Garcia earnestly holds the center as required, several other main cast members including Mitch Martín, Tristán Ulloa, Celine Tyll, Marina Troncoso , and José Ángel Egido are well-cast in their respective supporting parts, and the special mention goes to a certain stray cat in the film, which always steals the show whenever it appears on the screen.

In conclusion, “Romería” is another distinguished work from Simón after “Summer 1993” and “Alcarràs” (2022). With these three wonderful films, she demonstrates that she is a talented filmmaker with her own artistic sensitivity. and I will certainly have some expectation on how she will advance further from this considerable artistic achievement of hers.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Pillion (2025) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): Learning about his sexuality

“Pillion”, which won the Best Screenplay award when it was shown in the Un Certain Regard section of the Cannes Film Festival early in last year, is an alternatively amusing and fascinating drama about sexual maturity. Following a plain lad who comes to learn a lot about his sexuality via an unlikely lover of his, the movie explores those tricky matters of sex and desire, and the result is more thoughtful and poignant than expected. 

At the beginning, we are introduced to a young gay man named Colin (Harry Melling). He is openly gay, and his parents are actually willing to find any suitable boyfriend for him, but, like many other young men around his age, he is not so sure about what he exactly wants and desires. After singing several songs along with his friends at a local bar, he has a blind date with some guy there, but it is clear that they do not click that well with each other despite being nice and cordial to each other.

However, someone else begins to draw Colin’s attention, and that is a handsome biker named Ray (Alexander Skarsgård). Right from when they come across each other, something instantly clicks between them even though they do not interact much with each other on the surface, and, what do you know, Colin comes to have a quick sexual encounter with Ray not long after that.

Ray turns out to have a specific sexual taste. He gets aroused by being sexually dominant, and, to his little surprise, Colin discovers that he is actually quite willing to do whatever Ray wants. During their first sexual encounter, Ray quickly takes the role of master, and Colin cannot help but become excited about that being Ray’s submissive sex partner.

And that is just the beginning of their kinky romantic relationship. Ray subsequently allows Colin into his flat, but he also strictly reminds Colin of who the boss is. He has Colin do several domestic stuffs including cooking for him, and he also has a rather intense physical moment with Colin just for another sexual fun for them. In addition, they begin to hang around with several biker gay couples not so different from them, and it does not take much time for Colin to become more like one of them. Besides often being on the pillion of Ray’s motorcycle, he shaves his head, and he also wears a metal necklace with a lock to complement Ray’s accessory key.  

  Because their son is quite happier than before, Colin’s parents do not interfere with whatever is going on between him and Ray, but they cannot help but become concerned at times for understandable reasons. For example, Ray has never told that much about himself to Colin while being often cold and distant to Colin, and Colin’s parents, who have earnestly built their loving relationship together for many years, do not feel fine about that. When Colin manages to have Ray have a lunch with his parents, they try to be nice to Ray as much as possible, but then the mood becomes quite awkward between them and Ray as Colin’s mother throws some inconvenient questions.

Nevertheless, the screenplay by director/writer Harrty Lighton, which is based on Adam Mars-Jones’ novel “Box Hill”, sticks to its non-judgmental attitude while focusing more on Colin’s growing attachment and dependence on Ray. Despite his frequently aloof attitude, Ray can sometimes be a bit nicer to Colin, and Colin appreciates that – especially when Ray holds a little nice event for them and their fellow gay couples on Colin’s birthday.

The movie does not hesitate to delve more into the sexual aspects of Colin’s relationship with Ray, and you may be amused a bit by when they and several other fellow gay couples have a sort of orgy at some remote place. We see a lot of carnal dominance and submission across the screen, and this will remind you of how one’s specific sexuality can actually look funny to others.  

 It goes without saying that Colin comes to want more from his sex partner than before, and that is where their situation becomes more intense than before. While he can be a little more flexible about what Colin wants from him, Ray has certain limits he cannot possibly overcome, and there is a brief but revealing wordless moment when he suddenly and achingly realizes that he is not holding the power over his relationship with Colin now.

This compelling power dynamics between Colin and Ray along the story is illustrated with vivid and realistic details to observe, and the two lead actors are utterly convincing as their characters pull or push each other throughout the film. Harry Melling, who seems to be on the way of becoming another wonderful actor nurtured by the Harry Potter movies besides Daniel Radcliffe and Robert Pattinson, is convincing his character’s gradual emotional maturation, and his sensitive acting is flawlessly complemented by Alexander Skarsgård, who brings a lot of sexiness and charisma to his rather elusive character.

Overall, “Pillion”, which is incidentally released as “Please Have Me on Your Backseat” in South Korean theaters, is worthwhile to watch for its witty and thoughtful handling of its main subject, and it somehow made me reflect a bit on my rather messy sex life during last 10 years, which can incidentally be a gay version of “The Worst Person in the World” (2021) in my humble opinion. I had a fair share of discontent and disappointment as getting mingled with one dude after another, but I came to learn more about my own sexual desire and yearning at least, and that is why I smiled and then was touched a bit as observing Colin during the last scene of the film. Well, he does know what he really wants now, doesn’t he?

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Eureka (2000) ☆☆☆(3/4): After an incident

I must confess that Shinji Aoyama’s 2000 film “Eureka”, which happens to be released in South Korean theaters a few days ago, tested my patience more than once. This is one of those dry, slow, and distant movies demanding a lot of patience from you right from the beginning, and I actually checked the time more than once during my viewing. Nevertheless, I also admired its confident handling of mood, story, and character, and it is surely a rewarding cinematic experience you will not forget easily.

The movie begins with how the mundane daily life of its three main characters is suddenly shattered on one day. Makoto Sawai (Kōji Yakusho), a plain ordinary bus driver working in some rural town outside Fukuoka, and several passengers on his bus are suddenly attacked by some deranged dude, who eventually holds Makoto and two teenagers as hostages after killing everyone else in the bus. Although they are fortunately rescued as this crazy guy is subsequently killed by the police, Makoto finds himself quite traumatized by this incident, and so are Kozue (Aoi Miyazaki) and Naoki (Masaru Miyazaki), those two teenagers who are incidentally siblings.

After struggling to process his trauma from this shocking incident, Makoto eventually leaves his family as well as his wife, but then he returns to the town two years later. Although he is welcomed by his family and then gets employed in some local construction company, he remains distant and isolated from others around him including his family members, and then there eventually comes a point when he cannot live with his family any more for a rather petty reason.

After getting out of his family house, Makoto goes to the house belonging to Kozue and Naoki, who have lived alone for a while as their mother left and then their father died due to an unfortunate accident. After seeing that the kids really need someone to take care of them, Makoto volunteers to become their de facto adult guardian, and both Kozue and Naoki do not mind this at all, though there is still not much interaction between them and Makoto.

Some time later, Kozue and Naoki are visited by Akihito (Yoichiro Saito), an older cousin of theirs willing to spend some time with them. While being initially perplexed by his younger cousins living with Makoto, Akihito quickly accepts Makoto without much objecting, and the movie phlegmatically observes these four characters gradually forming a sort of alternative family day by day.

However, the story slowly takes a dark turn as the town is disturbed by a series of mysterious murders. Mainly because these killings were started not long after Makoto arrived in the town, a local detective naturally begins to suspect Makoto even though there is still not any direct evidence to incriminate him, and the situation becomes all the more troubling for Makoto when someone close to him becomes the next victim.

Nevertheless, the movie does not hurry itself at all as steadily and somberly focusing on the melancholic frustration surrounding Makoto and several other characters near him. At one point, he has a meeting with his wife before they become officially divorced, and we gradually sense a lot of regretful bitterness from both of them as they talk more with each other. It is evident that Makoto simply wanted to get away from everything and then have a new beginning for himself, but, as his wife correctly observes, he has never got away from anything at all while being merely stuck in his miserable state. In case of Kozue and Naoki, they also seem to be stuck in their own world as remaining distant to Makoto as before, and that is why it is surprising to see Kozue eventually interacting a bit with Makoto later in the story.

For accentuating their moody status of life, Aoyama and his cinematographer Masaki Tamura shot their movie in heavily desaturated color, and there are several delicate long-take scenes where Tamura’s camera subtly captures the emotional drama among Makoto and several other main characters around him. Although the camera mostly remains static, we come to pay more attention thanks to thoughtful camera movement and precise scene composition, and we accordingly get more immersed into its slow but engaging narrative flow.

I will not go into details on how the story takes an unexpected turn during its last act, but I can tell you instead that everything in the movie is held together well by the quietly strong presence of Kōji Yakusho, who has been one of the most dependable actors of Japanese Cinema during the last two decades. Even when his character does not seem to signify much on the surface, Yakusho deftly conveys to us his character’s dark inner conflict along the story, and he is also supported well by several other main cast members including Yoichiro Saito, Sayuri Kokushō, Ken Mitsuishi, and Aoi and Masaru Miyazaki, who are incidentally real-life siblings.

On the whole, “Eureka” is worthwhile to watch for its several excellent qualities including its lead actor’s memorable performance. Although I am not very enthusiastic about it compared to many other critics and reviewers out there, I am willing to revisit it someday for re-evaluation, and I may come to observe and feel more in the next time.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Wild Sing (2026) ☆☆☆(3/4): Their bumpy comeback

Surprise is always crucial in case of comedy films, and South Korean film “Wild Sing” has a lot of surprises along its seemingly predictable narrative route. Right from the very beginning, I could clearly see how it will roll its story and characters, but then the movie tickled me and the audiences around me more and more with a number of unexpected comic moments. Furthermore, it also made me like and care about its broad comic characters more than expected, and I came to root for them more when they eventually arrive at their expected climactic moment.

At the beginning, we see how its three main characters came to have an unexpected success as popular entertainers. When they form a three-member mixed group together as suggested by their manager at first, Hyeon-woo (Gang Dong-won), Sang-goo (Um Tae-goo) and Do-mi (Park Ji-hyun) do not expect that much, but, what do you know, their group quickly become quite popular thanks to their joint efforts, and we soon see them enjoying their another moment of career triumph.

However, this success of theirs does not last that long because of a sudden unexpected incident involved with plagiarism, and they are all forgotten by the public several years later. As struggling at the bottom of his career, Hyeon-woo cannot possibly say no when he is requested to perform along with his two former colleagues at a rather modest local event, but there is one problem. Both Sang-goo and Do-mi still do not like Hyeon-woo a lot, and working with Hyeon-woo is the last thing they want to do right now.

However, of course, Sang-goo and Do-mi eventually join Hyeon-woo for their respective personal reasons, but, of course, things do not go that well for them thanks to a series of absurd happenings. In addition, their situation becomes all the more complicated when an old rival of theirs gets involved with them later in the story, and they become more desperate and frustrated as they are running out of time.

As its main characters bounce from one comic moment to each other, the movie steadily supplies a fair amount of surprise and laugh along the story. There is a hilarious moment when the main characters try to take care of the supposedly unconscious body of a certain character, and the movie does a good job of building more comic momentum as they come upon more troubles on their bumpy way. When the main characters manage to arrive at that local event at the last minute, there are still some nice surprises to induce more laughs from us, and then we are surely served with a big moment of song and dance to amuse and then excite us.

Several original songs in the film function well as a crucial comic element in the story. Most of the rap songs from Sang-goo feel rather childish in my humble opinion, but they certainly make a good contrast with when he finally performs something really nice in the end. In case of one hideously cheesy ballad song, it turns out to be a bit catchier than expected as becoming a hilarious running gag throughout the story, and you will surely have a lot of laughs because of that. 

Above all, the movie is supported by the effortless chemistry among its three principal cast members, who do not hesitate to throw themselves into many silly but undeniably funny moments in the film. Gang Dong-won, who has been one of the most diligent actors in South Korean Cinema during last 15 years, demonstrates more of his comedy skill previously shown in “Dr. Cheon And Lost Talisman” (2023), and he also looks mostly convincing when his character does a lot of physical movements on the stage, though, considering a lot of busy editing, they probably used several stunt performers for that. Um Tae-gu, who is also no stranger to comedy considering his funny performance in “Adulthood” (2018), handles his own comic moments well, and we come to have some respect on his goofy character’s clumsy but sincere musical efforts. Park Ji-hyun, who recently drew our attention for her chilling performance in “Hidden Face” (2024), surprises us with another side of her considerable talent while ably balancing herself well between her two co-stars, and we certainly cheer when her character makes a practical decision for her and her colleagues around the end of the story.

Several supporting performers also have each own moment to shine. While Oh Jung-se, who was quite amusing in “Hi-Five” (2025), often steals the show as another washed-up musician in the story, Kang Ki-young, who plays a rather anonymous entertainer who somehow becomes more popular than before, has a couple of good comic scenes with Gang, and Shin Ha-kyun is also solid in his wry comic supporting performance.

Overall, “Wild Sing” injects a lot of wit and humor into its rather conventional plot and character, and it is another good comedy film from director Son Jae-gon, Although I did not like his second feature film “My Scary Girl” (2006) enough for recommendation, I enjoyed his next two films “Villain and Widow” (2010) and “Secret Zoo” (2020), and “Wild Sing” shows that he has not lost any of his skill yet despite his unfortunately sporadic filmmaking career. In short, this is one of the more enjoyable South Korean films of this year, and I wholeheartedly recommend you to give it a chance someday.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

FC Sukhavati (2024) ☆☆☆(3/4): The story of FC Anyang Supporters RED

South Korean independent documentary film “FC Sukhavati” presents a dramatic real-life story about the hardcore supporters of a minor football club. Although their football club has not always been satisfying during last two decades, they have diligently and sincerely supported their football club as much as possible because they actually earned their football club via lots of efforts and struggles, and the documentary is often touching as closely observing their deeply personal passion and enthusiasm.

At the beginning, the documentary shows and tells how Anyang, one of those numerous satellite cities surrounding Seoul, happened to have its own professional football club in 1996. As the South Korean society continued its rapid social/economic development during the 1980s, the South Korean government, which was under the dictatorship of President Chun Doo-hwan at that time, blatantly promoted sports industry as a way to distract its citizens from more demand for democratization, and this led to a considerable growth and advance in South Korean sports industry during the next decade.

At first, not many people were enthusiastic when Anyang LG Cheetahs moved from Seoul, but, what do you know, it gradually drew more fans and supporters during next few years. Around the early 2000s when the South Korean society was swept by the excitement surrounding the 2002 FIFA World Cup to be held in both Japan and South Korea, Anyang LG Cheetahs became one of the most prominent professional football clubs in the South Korean football league, and its supporter group were also known a lot for how passionately they rooted for their team.

Directors Baru Na and Shin Ho-bin interview several key members of the supporter group, and each of them has each own interesting story to tell. Although the time when they were young and wild is gone now, they are all proud of being a part of something far bigger than themselves, and they all eagerly talk about how much they cheered for their team in one way or another. At some point, they and others began to use a special type of gunpowder to generate red flare for cheering for their team more, and this eventually became a sort of trademark for their group.

However, their good time did not go that long. Not long after the 2002 FIFA World Cup, Anyang LG Cheetahs suddenly moved back to Seoul and then became FC Seoul. Needless to say, many members of its supporters were quite exasperated and devastated to say the least, but they were reminded again and again that there was nothing they could do for stopping this irreversible change.

During next several years, some of the hardcore supporters desperately tried to keep their group intact at least, but, of course, their group slowly crumbled as many of the members quit and then supported some other local professional football club instead. Every member in the documentary bitterly remembers this dark period of theirs, and some of them also look back on when they boldly committed some radical acts of demonstration in the middle of big football games.  

Eventually, the supporters stuck together under one particular cause around the early 2010s. They demanded to the city government that their city should have its own professional football club again, and the mayor was actually willing to support the cause as much as he could, but, not so surprisingly, he and the supporters soon faced a number of political obstacles. For example, there were a considerable number of city council members against having a professional football club again, and this certainly frustrated the supporters more than once.

Fortunately, thanks to the diligent efforts from them as well as the mayor, the supporters finally came to have a new professional football club. Now the name of their group was changed to FC Anyang Supporters RED, and they usually wear purple uniforms, but they still use that red flare as before because, well, there was not any better alternative for that.

During its second half, the documentary emphasizes the remarkably strong bond between FC Anyang and its supporter group. Knowing well how hard they tried and fought for getting their own professional football club, the members of FC Anyang Supporters RED never say any bad word to those FC Anyang players while always showing full support and respect, though they can be quite aggressive just like any other football support group out there. When their team happened to have a big game with FC Seoul on one day, they gave FC Seoul a lot of hell with one huge group act, and that was certainly something to be remembered by everyone at the spot.   

The mood later becomes a little dramatically tense as the documentary focuses on one particularly important game for FC Anyang and its supporters, but it still takes time for observing the achingly human moments observed from its main subject. Yes, these supporters in the documentary may look silly and ridiculous at times, but it is difficult not to be amused and then touched by how they and many others got emotionally connected together for their precious football team. Just like life, being a football club supporter can be hard and frustrating at times, but there also sometimes come some moments to be savored and cherished by them, and you will understand that well if you have anything you are privately passionate about (In case of me…. well, do I really have to tell you?)

In conclusion, “FC Sukhavati”, whose title incidentally comes from a Sanskrit word associated with the name of the city in the documentary, deserves to be labeled as a “feel-good documentary” for its crowd-pleasing moments, and you will certainly smile a bit as observing the universal aspects of countless soccer fans around the world. I still observe them from the distance, but I come to have some understanding and empathy in the end, and that is what a good documentary can do in my inconsequential opinion.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Don’t Go Back (2025) ☆☆☆(3/4): A series of little improvised moments

South Korean independent film “Don’t Go Back”, which I happened to miss when it was released in local theaters around the end of last year, is a small but interesting test run to watch. Although the result is rather modest on the whole, there are enough substance and spontaneity to support its little two-act comedy drama, and you can clearly sense the considerable potential from its first-time director, who happened to do a lot of things besides directing and co-writing the film.

First, let me give you some background information on the accidental production of the film. When director/co-writer/co-producer Ryu Hyun-kyun worked with her co-star/co-writer Kim Choong-gil during the shooting a little independent film directed by a saxophonist named KimOki, Ryu came to have a little idea for her movie, and she shot what would be the first part of her movie along with Kim while getting some assistance from KimOki and his several cast and crew members. To be frank with you, I really have no idea on how much Kim and Ryu are actually overlapped with their respective fictionalized versions in the film, but I can tell you instead at least that they are instantly spontaneous as clicking well with each other right from the very beginning. Starting from Ryu’s simple story settling, she and Kim improvised in one way or another during their first scene in the film, and their result is fairly fluid on the whole except a few moments of sudden editing.

Anyway, what happens during their scene is gradually amusing for us. As the shooting was wrapped, everyone becomes a bit relaxed, and that is when Kim confesses his growing attraction toward Ryu. While understandably being caught off guard by his confession, Ryu naturally tries to handle their awkward situation as tactfully as possible, but, to her frustration, Ryu remains persistent in his yearning toward her. As they push and pull each other during next several minutes, the movie slowly and deftly builds up its comic momentum, and its two lead performers do not make any misstep at all to the end.

After this effectively humorous setup, the story goes a bit further for extra amusement. Both Ryu and Kim respectively talk about the growing awkwardness between them to several others around them, and this leads to several humorous moments including the one where Kim is surprised to find that there is actually someone really drawn to him from the beginning. Needless to say, the mood becomes awkward between them, and then we get some little laugh as observing how these two characters come to lean on each other as sharing more of their respective romantic frustration.

And then the movie moves forward to several months later. After getting more frustrated with how his acting career has been going nowhere, Kim eventually decides to quit acting, and then he goes down to Busan for getting a job at some local clothing shop. Although he is willing to experience and learn more about business, he only comes to show how awkward he is as a salesman, and his employer decides to let him go in the end.

Meanwhile, Ryu also comes to Busan for her own reason. She is asked to do a little private lecture in front of the cast members of a little independent film made by one of her old colleagues, and she is initially willing to answer anything, but the situation becomes quite embarrassing for her as most of the cast members turns out to be pretty rude or inattentive. At least, one of them shows some respect and manner to her, and this figure generously invites her to a little jazz performance to be held in the following evening.

It is not much of a spoiler to tell you that Ryu and Kim eventually come across each other at that evening performance, but the movie does not hurry itself and its two main characters at all. We see them wandering around the beach area of Busan, but they somehow do not encounter each other without noticing anything at all, and they are genuinely surprised when they come to spot each other in the middle of the performance.

The story subsequently culminates to another private conversation between them. Mainly because there is not any regret or bitterness between them now, Kim and Ryu become more comfortable with each other than before, and they are all the more amused when there turns out to be something common between them. The movie remains open and uncertain about whatever will happen next between them, but now we sense some real connection between them, and that touchingly resonates with a song performed around the end of the evening concert. Again, Ryu and Kim ably complement each other with their distinctive personalities, and they are also supported well by several main cast members including Kim Mu-geon, Shin Min-jae, and KimOki, who also participated in the production of the film besides handling one of the substantial supporting roles in the film.

In conclusion, “Don’t Go Back” is a solid directorial debut for Ryu, who has been mainly known for appearing a number of notable South Korean movies and TV dramas for many years. I must confess that I have not paid much attention to her, but the movie shows that she is an engaging actress as well as a competent filmmaker, and I will surely see more of her considering how she keeps going even at this point. In fact, she also founded a distribution company for herself just for distributing her movie, and it will be really interesting to see the next steps in her multi-faceted career.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Marty, Life Is Short (2026) ☆☆☆(3/4): He’s still ready to make us laugh more

Netflix documentary film “Marty, Life Is Short”, which was released a few weeks ago, looks around the life and career of Martin Short, a prominent Canadian entertainer who has steadily advanced for our laugh and entertainment during last several decades. Although the overall result is as mild as you can expect from your average Netflix celebrity documentary, it is still fairly fun and engaging to watch Short and a bunch of well-known interviewees gladly talking about his life and career, and you will come to admire his talent and spirit a bit more than before.

At first, the documentary gives us a brief overview on Short’s early life, and Short willingly talks about how much he was supported and encouraged by his parents and siblings as the youngest member of the family. He already showed his potential as a natural comedian even when he was very young, and his family, who all had a fair share of sense of humor, was always there for him as often playing along with him.

Not long after he got enrolled in a local university in Ontario, Canada, Short decided to go to Toronto along with his best friend Eugene Levy for pursuing their acting career, and they eventually got cast for a new production of a Broadway hit musical named “Godspell”. Among many other cast members, there was an actress named Gilda Radner, and she and Short came to have an on-and-off relationship between them for a while, but then he eventually began a long-term relationship with Radner’s understudy Nancy Dolman, who subsequently married him in 1980.

Meanwhile, Short’s career gradually gained momentum. When Chicago’s Second City improv comedy theatre established a sister company in Toronto, Levy and many of his colleagues immediately joined that sister company, Short hesistated at first, but, after several years of struggle and frustration, he eventually joined them, and there came a big career breakthrough for him when the Toronto Second City group produced a show named “Second City Television” (SCTV). Right from his first SCTV appearance, Short drew a lot of attention as effortlessly shining with his irrepressible comic energy, and that is quite evident from a number of archival video clips from that time. While he often played very broad caricatures, he illustrated them with considerable personality and spirit, and that certainly left indelible impressions on his audiences.

Thanks to his growing popularity via SCTV, Short subsequently joined the cast of “Saturday Night Lives” in 1984. Although he soon found his work environment rather demanding at first, Short kept going for a while, and then he got a chance to appear along with Steve Martin and Chevy Chase in a little comedy film named “Three Amigo” (1986). Although the movie sadly turned out to be a big critical/commercial failure, it led to the beginning of a longtime friendship between Short and Martin at least, who have recently been enjoying together the big success of their delightful Hulu comedy series “Only Murders in the Building”.

Although he did not make much success in cast of movies except a few shining spots including “Innerspace” (1987) and “The Father of the Bride” (1991), Short made a considerable success here and there at least. He demonstrated the other wonderful sides of his talent via several successful Broadway musicals during the 1990-2000s, and he actually won a Tony for one of them. In addition, he also showed that he is quite capable of drama performance as shown from his Emmy-nominated turn in TV drama series “Damages”, and I particularly have a soft spot on his humorous but ultimately poignant supporting turn in 1998 TV miniseries “Merlin”.

Eventually, the documentary comes to revolve around the routine private meetings for not only Short and his family but also his and his wife’s close friends. They usually gathered at the summerhouse for Short’s family, and you will be amazed a bit by the casual appearance of some of the biggest figures working in Hollywood. Thanks to Short’s amiable charm and energy and his wife’s equally strong personality to complement to him, the guests were never bored at all, and we later get a little amusing video clip of Short and Tom Hanks parodying a certain famous scene from “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid” (1969), which was incidentally shot by none other than Steven Spielberg.

The documentary also focuses on several moments of sadness in Short’s life. While one of his brothers died early in his life, he lost both of his parents before he became 20, and both of these personal losses certainly devastated him a lot. In 2010, his wife died not long after being diagnosed to have a terminal cancer, and one of his three adopted children sadly committed suicide early in this year (The documentary is dedicated to her and Catherine O’Hara, who was one of Short and his wife’s close friends and was naturally interviewed for the documentary not long before she unfortunately passed away early in this year). Nevertheless, Short kept focusing on work, and that helped him a lot in processing his immense personal grief.

On the whole, “Marty, Life Is Short” may not be that revealing, but it is supported well by the strong presence and personality of Short, and director/co-producer Lawrence Kasdan, who has been less prominent during last 20 years compared to his peak period in the 1980s, did an admirable job of presenting Short’s life and career with enough care and respect. As another close friend of Short, he was probably not able to be totally objective to his main subject from the beginning, but the documentary may be his best work since “Grand Canyon” (1991), and that is surely something nice to watch.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment