Rush (2013) ☆☆☆(3/4) : The race between two contrasting personalities

rush05 “Rush”, a high-octane sports drama about two famous real-life figures of Formula One(F1), is more interested in personalities than car races. That is one of good things in the movie, but I have some doubts on whether its plot structure is really effective for the story to tell. The tension between its two contrasting heroes is interesting, and this dramatic tension is nicely emphasized by its well-crafted race sequences, but its balanced approach between two highly competitive guys are not very successful due to the inherent imbalance in its story.

The movie goes back and forth between them from the beginning when they were young newcomers of F3, which is an equivalent of the minor league in their field. James Hunt(Chris Hemsworth), a swaggering British guy always looking for fun including alcohol and woman(the latter one is the main reason why the movie got R rating), looks like a hunky jerk arrogant about his driving skill when we see him first, but, as others around him admit, he is indeed a talented race car driver despite his notoriety inside and outside the track, and this ambitious guy is determined to be the F1 champion because, well, he thinks he can.

While he is looking for a chance to go up to F1, he meets Niki Lauda(Daniel Brühl) from Austria, and they quickly become each other’s main rival after their first encounter at the race track in 1970. Lauda is also a man of equally ambitious, competitive, and abrasive personality, but he approaches to the race more carefully in contrast to Hunt’s risky and reckless attitude. He is also willing to take a risk, but that comes after some thoughts and calculations; he decided to become a F1 driver after concluding that it is only thing he can do well, so he put everything he had to the race at one point when his wealthy family did not support him.

rush02They eventually go up to the F1 level while still maintaining the aggressive rivalry between them, and the movie mainly focuses on their fierce competition around the world during 1976. Lauda is a defending champion now, and Hunt is ready to be the next champion, and they keep clashing with each other whenever they can while going through many F1 races all over the world with other competitors.

The F1 race scenes are just as much as we can expect; with Hans Zimmer’s relentless score which pounds hard as if it depicted a bunch of Batmobiles, they mainly consist of quick shots mostly showing the characters wearing helmets, their hands handling gears and steering wheels, their feet pushing pedals, the pistons pumping inside engines, the whooshing race cars on the track, the announcers on broadcast, and, of course, that familiar camera viewpoint attached to the side of vehicles. This is nothing new, but they feel thrilling and dangerous as required, and some of them reminded me of my unpleasant night experiences with those speedy taxis in my city, which are driven like minor race cars when it is dark and quiet on the streets around midnight.

After the turing point in Lauda’s career, Hunt and Lauda gradually recognize and respect each other as the fellow rivals pushing each other, and that aspect is probably what attracted the screenplay writer Peter Morgan from the first place, whose best works were inspired by the conflicts between real-life figures in opposite positions. “The Deal”(2003) was about how Tony Blair and Gordon Brown competed with each other and then reached to the agreement which would affect their respective political careers forever, and “The Queen”(2006) was about how Queen Elizabeth II of England was persuaded by Tony Blair to drop her aloof attitude and make a public appearance after Princess Diana’s death, and “Frost/Nixon”(2008) was about the historical interviews between David Frost and Richard Nixon which culminated to Nixon’s painful admission on his political mistake through Frost’s persistent questions.

rush04Although Morgan’s screenplay never flinches from the flaws of its driven heroes(as their respective spouses find, they are guys not so easy to live with), it rarely goes deep into them while going through conventional ups and downs they experience during their competition, and sometimes the story loses its balance. Whatever Hunt might have felt during his darkest moments, his plight looks pale compared to Lauda’s gruelling comeback process after one disastrous accident, and that is the main reason why the last race sequence unfolded in Japan feels like a prolonged epilogue. The movie makes another mistake through the fancy montage scene following it, and that causes the conclusion scene to lose its dramatic effect to considerable degrees.

Two lead actors fit into their respective roles nicely. Chris Hemsworth is more interesting here than when he was playing some superhero guy with a mighty hammer, and Daniel Brühl has good dramatic moments when Lauda bravely tries to be back on the track while recovering from his massive injuries including a hideous burn on his forehead. They work together well on the screen, and, though not as effective as intended, the aforementioned conclusion scene feels touching because we can see that Hunt and Lauda have learned a lot from each other while finding something common between them.

rush03In contrast, the supporting actors remain at the fringe while being mostly wasted. The worst case is Olivia Wilde, and she has virtually nothing to do except marrying Hunt, and then leaving him for Richard Burton, and then later watching her ex-husband’s race on TV. As Lauda’s ever-supporting wife, Alexandra Maria Lara has an amusing scene with Brühl early in the movie when they try hitchhiking after her car is broken, but then all she is demanded to do is just looking concerned about her husband’s safety on the track.

Despite all these flaws mentioned above, I enjoyed “Rush” enough to recommend it to you because its good things manage to compensate for its visible flaws in the end. The director Ron Howard did a fine job of keeping the movie racing along the plot in spite of many glitches, and I like some of its major moments even though my grumbles remain same as before. It’s surely formulaic as a sports film, but it is nice to see a movie trying to be a little more thoughtful than Fast & Furious movies.

rush01

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Hwayi (2013) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4) : A boy raised by his five criminal fathers

Hwai01 They say every man has his own daddy issue to deal with, and the adolescent hero of darkly riveting South Korean thriller film “Hwayi” has a particularly overwhelming one. He has been raised, taught, and influenced by five men who have taken care of him since he was taken to their dark criminal world, and, as he comes to furiously resist against them in his twisted oedipal journey, he struggles with his own darkness inherited from his ‘fathers’. He hates them more than before because of that, but they are still a part of his life and his identity no matter how much he resists, and he eventually finds himself becoming more like them – will he become the very monster he has feared since his childhood?

Hawyi(Yeo Jin-goo) looks like a normal high school student on the surface, but he has a dark secret shared with his five ‘fathers’ in a nice house located in some country area outside Seoul, and the tense opening sequence shows us how his life got involved with these people when he was very young. I will not describe it in details, but let’s say this taut moment has some good surprises under its suspenseful mood including where young Hawyi is kept by Seok-tae(Kim Yoon-Seok) and his gangs.

They could kill young Hwayi after their plan to collect the ransom was botched in the end, but he was instead taken under their wings, and that was the beginning of a strange alternative family. 14 years have passed, and Hwayi is now their loving son, and all of them are his dads while Yeong-joo(Lim Ji-eun), Seok-tae’s wife who was a captive just like Hwayi at that time, is like a caring mom to him. Although he has never gone through any proper education in their isolated world, Seok-tae and his gangs have taught Hwayi lots of things including driving and sharpshooting, and, as revealed later in the movie, he is a very good apprentice to make his criminal fathers proud.

Hwai03 Because Hwayi is approaching to adulthood, Jin-seong(Jang Hyeon-seong), the thoughtful and sophisticated member of the bunch who manages their dirty business, thinks Hwayi deserves to have a life better than theirs. While he can lead a fairly good criminal career with his learned skills, Hwayi also has a considerable artistic talent(we see several good sketches in his notebook at one point), and Jin-seong is willing to help him in any possible ways.

However, it seems that Seok-tae, the leader of the bunch(while casually calling other fathers ‘dad’, Hwayi always calls him ‘father’), has the other idea. Hwayi was frequently terrorized by the monster in the basement where he was locked in, and, though it is apparently a pigment of his imagination possibly fueled by his horrible situation, the monster keeps haunting him, and Seok-tae takes a drastic measure to solve Hwayi’s problem once for all; he is going to push Hwayi more deeply into the dark, ruthless criminal world of him and others.

The movie gets darker and bloodier after Hwayi directly participates in his dads’ works and then accidently(or fatefully) learns about himself more than he imagined, and the movie drives its story to the destined point with a vengeance through its volatile mix of family melodrama and crime drama. Some of its surprises can be easily predicted in advance, but they strike us hard with emotional impacts, and that accordingly pushes its main characters to their inevitable conflict calling for blood and revenge.

Hwai05 The director Jang Joon-hwan, who made a long-awaited comeback with this film, shows here that the potential shown in his exceptional debut film “Save the Green Planet!”(2003) is not eroded at all. While it does not have that loony raw power of his debut film, “Hwayi” is a compelling genre piece packed with good action/suspense scenes and accompanying gray ambience. There is always a foreboding sense of fatalism at every corner of the screen, and it is effectively manifested through its gloomy spaces including the certain crucial characters’ lone residence surrounded by demolished houses.

Things get complicated as the police and other underworld figures come into the picture, but the movie stays focused on the love/hate relationship between Hwayi and Seok-tae, and the performances by Kim Yoon-seok and Yeo Jin-goo ably carry the movie even when the plot become shaky at times. As shown in “The Yellow Sea”(2010), another dark South Korean crime thriller drama driven by the darkness of human heart, Kim Yoon-seok is good at conveying the steely brutality behind his plain but commanding appearance, and young actor Yeo Jin-goo does more than holding his own place amid the adult co-actors. The movie is essentially his character’s coming-of-age drama, and Yeo Jin-goo is believable in every step as his character is transformed from a boy fearing his own monster to a man finally engulfing it. In that aspect, the movie reminds me a lot of David Michôd’s “Animal Kingdom”(2010), which was also about the sad loss of innocence in the criminal world.

Although less developed in comparison, the supporting characters bring some colors to the moody story. Cho Jin-Woong, Kim Seong-gyoon, Jang Hyeon-seong, and Park Hae-joon quickly establish their respective characters right from their first appearance; Cho Jin-wong is one of few sympathetic characters in the film, and Kim Seong-gyoon is always on the edge with his possibly psychopathic character. While Lim Ji-eun is pitiful as a woman confined in her hopeless position by her men and then by herself, Nam Ji-hyeon is a plucky high school girl who happens to begin a tentative relationship with Hwayi, and her scenes with Yeo jin-goo are a few precious warm spots in the movie.

Hwai04 While it loses its steam around the ending, “Hwayi” is a gripping noir drama supported by its skillful direction and convincing performances. Like several notable South Korean films, the movie also reflects the dark sides of modern South Korean society through its gritty tale, and there is an interesting aspect associated with social class issues when hidden motives and connections are revealed during a chilling encounter between two contrasting characters. Its view on the modern South Korean society, which is still dominated by Confucian patriarchal ideas and haunted by the history of violence during the 20th Century, is ultimately pessimistic, but its somber ending comes with a small glimmer of hope none the less(There is a tiny but crucial scene after the end credit, so don’t leave the screening room too early).

Mainly because of the local box office failure of “Save the Green Planet!”, Jang Joon-Hwan could never fully expand his career despite lots of critical praises he received for that cult film which has steadily gained its reputation since its release(the movie is one of the best South Korean films of the last decade at least in my opinion). He did not make any feature film for last 10 years except a few short films, but now he succeeds in making his second work with the major Korean actors who can draw lots of audiences, and I am glad to see that it is also a pretty good one. I hope he will be able to go on with more good works.

Hwai02

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

This is the End (2013) ☆☆☆(3/4) : Funny actors in the middle of Apocalypse

thisistheend01 As its title suggests, “This is the End” is about the end of the world, and it has indeed plenty of fire and brimstone to pour on its funny cast. While it is almost certain that they are going to be doomed just like everyone left on the Earth, we are constantly bombarded with small and big laughs as the world outside is showered with fire and smoke and other apocalyptic signs, and there are several absolutely hilarious moments surrounded by its mildly amusing jokes involving with the main actors having a ball with playing the fictional version of themselves in the movie.

Based on Jason Stone’s short film “Jay and Seth vs. The Apocalypse”, the directors/writers Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg, who wrote the screenplay for that short film with Stone, sets the beginning of their irreverent story in the mundane mood before gleefully hurling their friends/colleagues and others into Hell on Earth to be unfolded on LA. Jay Baruchel, nerdy and neurotic as he was in “Almost Famous”(2000) or “She’s Out of My League”(2010), visits LA to meet his close friend Seth Rogen, and he is warmly welcomed by his friend at the airport before going to Rogen’s house for smoking marijuana together. After their several dizzy hours with marijuana have quickly passed, Rogen, who looks less chubby than before but still not so different from his jolly teddy bear image I am familiar with, takes Baruchel to the night party at James Franco’s big modern house, but Baruchel is reluctant because of Jonah Hill(he does not like Hill for some reason).

At Franco’s residence, which looks like a stack of Lego blocks from the outside, we see lots of well-known figures in Hollywood business here and there as everyone has another fun night with music and booze. Two of the most notable guests are Emma Watson and Michael Cera, and Cera is virtually on the full-throttle mode for completely wrecking his shy, awkward kid persona previously exemplified in “Juno”(2007) and “Superbad”(2007). He is more or less than a cocaine-snorting jerk here in this film, and we also witness him having some private moment with two ladies in the bathroom.

thisistheend04 And then something happens when Rogen and Baruchel go outside to buy cigarette. A huge Earthquake suddenly strikes LA, and they see a bunch of people being transported to the sky by mysterious blue light beams, and then the pandemonium erupts in the city. The party guests are initially oblivious to what is going on outside, but they soon find the ground in front of the house cracked and then crumbled to create a big giant hole. The special effects in the movie are as good as the ones in, say, “2012”(2009), and you may be tickled by the sight of many famous entertainers tumbled and fallen into the fiery bottom below one by one(Cera gets the worst of it, and he truly deserves that for his effectively unlikable performance).

On the next morning, it becomes clearer to six survivors in the house that they are in the middle of the biblical disaster. While the electricity is somehow supplied to the house, the communication line is broken, and there is not much food in the house. In the outside, fire and smoke are everywhere(considering the scale of the disaster, it is rather amazing that they are not asphyxiated to die yet), and there is also something horrible moving around the house.

The middle part of the movie is relatively the least funny part because the story is basically stuck with its main actors in the confined space, but it is at least amusing to watch these funny actors rolling and clashing with each other within the limited space while the end is coming closer to them hour by hour. Rogen and Baruchel are the most sensible members of the bunch, and Baruchel quickly sees that what he and Rogen witnessed at the supermarket was none other than the Rapture as prophesied in the Book of Revelation – and he also sees that there might be a way out of this mess for them. While Franco plays a vain, egoistic prick version of himself, Jonah Hill is nicer than he was in his previous comedy films, and Craig Robinson and Danny McBride are not that far from their respective screen personas. Usually with his personal towel on his left shoulder, Robinson comes to us as a big soft guy in his usual low-key comic performance, and, as the most incorrigible one in the bunch, McBride wields his boorish impertinence whenever it is possible; you never doubt that he will certainly go to hell no matter what happens.

thisistheend03  The movie throws lots of inside jokes based on the careers of its main actors as they search for any way to increase their chance of survival or waste their precious time, and you may not fully enjoy them if you are not familiar with their careers. Hill’s recent Oscar nomination for “Moneyball”(2011) is naturally one of the main targets for laughs, and we even see a silly attempt to make the sequel to “Pineapple Express”(2008) in the middle of the story.

The movie also has other things to be enjoyed, and you will find them really funny regardless of your background knowledge. As the things get much worse outside, the movie goes all the way for more outrageous sights such as the giant devil with a certain big body part(you have to see it for yourself) and the hilarious cameo appearance by a certain major Hollywood star, and I must confess that I laughed hard while watching an uproarious moment during which “Rosemary’s Baby”(1968) and “The Exorcist”(1973) simultaneously came to my mind.

 Although they were responsible for disposable films like “The Watch”(2012) and “The Green Hornet”(2011), Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg are good comedy writers who can pull big laughs from us as proven in “Superbad” and “Pineapple Express”. While decorated with their usual raunchy male humor, “This is the End” is as funny as it can be, and it feels sort of sweet at times despite its loony background. After all, having some good laughs before thrown into hell is not a bad thing, and this is surely a fun apocalyptic ride to be enjoyed before you go to hell – or heaven, perhaps.

thisistheend02

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The Kings of Summer (2013) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4) : Their short summer deviation

small_thekingsofsummer01 I remember well when I watched the first trailer of “The Kings of Summer” early in this year. The movie got some positive responses after it was premiered at the Sundance Film Festival around that time, and, as far as I could observed from the trailer, the movie looked like a spirited coming-of-age comedy drama. It just showed its three teenager heroes having a musical fun with a big pipe line in the forest, and their sense of fun and enthusiasm made that moment charming and exciting.

However, when I saw the movie at last night, it turned to be not as exciting or funny or touching as I expected after watching the trailer. Although it is not entirely devoid of charm and energy, the movie frequently feels like a one-joke comedy stretched too long, and its weak story and characterization does not help much the good-spirited performances from its main cast which certainly deserves better than this. I was amused occasionally by their performances, and I enjoyed its vivid summer atmosphere, but, to be frank with you, I felt like a bored summer vacationer as the story dragged after its first 30 minutes.

The movie is about a short summer deviation of three boys who merely happen to get together and then go along with their impulsive plan. Joe(Nick Robinson) is a high schooler living with his widower father Frank(Nick Offerman), and his life with dad at home is suffocating to say the least. Frank is not exactly a loveless father, but his strict rules and constant sarcasm on his son always annoys Joe, and that attitude is not changed much even when they are with others. Offerman maintains his absolute deadpan performance while his character keeps finding from his son anything to be sarcastic about, and he is one of few things really funny in the movie.

In case of Joe’s friend Patrick(Gabriel Basso), he has an opposite problem with his equally suffocating parents, who care about their son too much. Mr. and Mrs. Keenan(Marc Evan Jackson and Megan Mullally) never lets their son go away from their sight, and their overbearing attitude recently becomes more insufferable after Patrick got a minor injury in his left foot. Like Joe, Patrick wants to get away from this suffocating environment if he can.

thekingsofsummer04Now the summer vacation begins, so they are bound to be stuck in their respective homes, but Joe comes upon a good idea after one night party near the forest. While wandering in the forest, he comes across a vacant lot in the middle of the forest, and then a small plan comes to his mind; he and Patrick can build a house at this spot, and they can live in the house while being free from their parents at least during the summer vacation.

Patrick is reluctant at first, but he eventually decides to join his friend and Biaggio(Moises Arias), a bizarre boy who somehow comes to participate in this plan from the beginning. Although Arias is a scene-stealer who will probably lead a good acting career in the future, one of the main problems in the movie is that it does not know what to do with this offbeat character except making him doing the series of weird things including his silly camouflage for hiding in the forest. He may be funny to watch at first, but the movie does not provide any substantial characterization to make him into a really funny character, and Arias’ performance becomes rather flat even though the movie keeps finding another weird behavior to play for him.

Once they finish building their house and then move into the house, the movie treads a predictable path. The sky is bright and clear, and the forest is cool and green, and the boys are excited and happy to be free in their own world, and, of course, their parents are worried after their boys’ elopement(Biaggio’s parents inexplicably never appear in the movie except one brief scene which merely shows his father’s neck being shaved). While the boys explore the environment around their house, the parents and police keep looking for them, and, not so surprisingly, the parents begin to think seriously about why the boys run away from them.

small_thekingsofsummer05Although the director Jordan Vogt-Roberts(this is his first feature film) did a good job of setting the nice, crisp atmosphere of summer days in his movie, I began to lose interest in the story mainly because Chris Galletta’s screenplay fails in developing its comic characters into something more than caricatures. There are several good individual moments, and that pipe line scene does not disappoint me at all, but they do not mesh well together to make a story which can hold our interest.

The story subsequently loses its breezy energy glimpsed during its first act as it loses its way amid slow motion shots and song-filled montages during its second act, and the conflict brought onto the third act through Kelly(Erin Moriarty), a nice girl Joe has had a crush on, is contrived and unconvincing. It is supposed to be a coming-of-drama about rebellious boys, but only growth I observed around the ending was the stubbles on their faces.

Anyway, “The Kings of Summer” is a flawed but likable film with nice things to be savored in its lightweight environment. Three young lead actors get along well with each other on the screen, and I felt a bit relaxed as appreciating those lovely summer scenes in the film. This is a little fun for a while, but, unfortunately, it just passes by like my recent summer days.

small_thekingsofsummer03

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Prisoners (2013) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4) : Good cop, Bad citizen

small_Prisoners01 “Prisoners” tries to roll two things at once to create bigger dramatic impacts. The one is about the grief and subsequent anger caused by a terrible incident, and the other one is about an increasingly frustrating investigation process for finding a culprit responsible for that incident. While there are several intense or interesting moments as we can expect from a dark thriller drama involving with kidnapping and (possibly) murder, the movie stumbles as its calm approach clashes with its heavy-handed mystery plot filled with obvious clues and typical plot turns, and the result is uneven and incoherent to say the least despite its good things to be admired.

From the beginning, you can instantly feel that something bad is going to happen. After the quiet but unnerving opening scene showing Keller Dover(Hugh Jackman) and his teenager son Ralph(Dylan Minnette) during their hunt at the forest, the movie moves to the comfortable suburban environment as Keller and his family enjoy the dinner at the house of his friend Franklin(Terrence Howard), but we see the ominous signs all around them – including a suspicious camping car parked nearby.

After the dinner, Keller’s young daughter Anna(Erin Gerasimovich) and Franklin’s young daughter Eliza(Zoe Soul) go out together to find a missing whistle at Keller’s home. When they do not return, their parents are naturally concerned, and their fear and panic are increased as it becomes quite possible that the girls were kidnapped by someone – and they may not see their girls alive again.

The main culprit is quickly arrested as soon as that camping car in question is spotted, but the local police cannot find anything incriminating from the vehicle or its driver, a retarded young man named Alex(Paul Dano). He is virtually a blank page except when he answers to simple questions or blurts out something to be suspected, and that certainly does not help Detective Loki(Jake Gyllenhaal) and others at the police station a lot.

small_Prisoners07 While Detective Loki concludes that there is no solid evidence against Alex despite some suspicion, Keller, who is literally on a full-seething mode, thinks differently. This is a guy who has always prepared for the worst(we later see his garage filled with canned foods and other equipments for survival) but realizes how much helpless he is in this terrible circumstance, and his furious anger is unsurprisingly directed toward Alex just because Alex was initially picked as a prime suspect.

It is possible that Alex is just an odd but innocent man-child taken care of by his aunt Holly(Melissa Leo), but Keller is more convinced of his guilty especially after his public clash with Alex in front of news reporters and policemen. We can have some reasonable doubt on what Alex faintly said to Keller during that moment, but, while overlooking the problems in his household, Keller becomes more obsessed with getting any evidence from Alex. He kidnaps him, and then locks him in an abandoned building, and then tortures him with the reluctant assistance from Franklin, who expresses disgust and doubt at first but helps his friend anyway due to Keller’s bullying certainty.

The movie enters a darker territory as Keller’s method becomes more drastic, but this part goes nowhere while Keller alternatively mulls over his torment and keeps torturing his miserable captive. Hugh Jackman is relentless in presenting the brooding side of his troubled character, and it is sort of fascinating to see how far Keller can go as driven by his grief and following obsession, but Jackman’s gloomy performance gets tiresome as he keeps seething and raging for most of his appearance time.

small_Prisoners06

The better part of the story belongs to the police investigation process, and that is where the story fits well with the director Denis Villeneuve’s cool, detached approach. He keeps the tension level high through subtle ways including careful scene composition, and the cinematographer Roger Deakins amply drenches the screen in the mood of insidious cloudy/rainy days. More puzzle pieces are thrown into the mystery plot including an unidentified body and a bunch of inexplicable maze pictures, and we get several suspenseful scenes such as when Detective Loki suddenly notices a possible culprit and then slowly begins to chase after him.

As a young detective gradually obsessed with his case, Jake Gyllenhaal gives the best performance in the film. While the movie does not tell us a lot about Detective Loki except some background information on his rough adolescent past, Gyllenhaal’s haunting performance fully presents a good, competent cop who probably learned one or two things about the dark side of human nature through his hard personal experience. He instinctively senses that Keller is playing a bad cop(or a bad citizen, shall we say) for himself, but he chooses to stay focused on his main job even though he comes to have a pretty good idea about where Keller is keeping Alex. After all, there are already too many things to handle in his labyrinthine investigation, and we can sense how much pressured he is while he looks more agitated and frustrated.

Despite its long running time(153-min), “Prisoners” was not a boring experience in spite of my uncomfortable viewing condition(I happened to sit on the floor at the back of the screening room), but I kept thinking of better films during the screening. While “In the Bedroom”(2001) and “Mystic River”(2003) delved more deeply and darkly into the grief and devastation resulted from the loss of a loved one, “Zodiac”(2007) more convincingly presented the people gradually consumed by their obsessive crime investigation going nowhere while strewn with countless possibilities.

small_Prisoners03

The movie is not without interesting aspects, but the screenplay by Aaron Guzikowski is frequently hampered by blatant symbolism and manipulation, and the good actors like Terrence Howard, Viola Davis, Paul Dano, Melissa Leo, and Maria Bello are wasted mainly due to thin characterization. As Keller’s distraught(and heavily medicated) wife, Bello is mostly stuck with her character on the bed, and Howard and Davis do as much as they can do with their thankless accessory roles. Davis, who plays Franklin’s wife, proves again that she is one of the valuable American actresses, and she handles the scene well where her character confronts with what her husband is doing with his friend.

Denis Villeneuve’s previous work was an Oscar-nominated film “Incendies”(2010), which I chose as one of the best films of 2011. Its plot was progressed rather mechanically, and I could see that the story moved from one point to the next point as planned in advance, but it was devastating to watch the movie finally arriving at its inevitable ending. Although it is a well-made and well-acted film, I only observed plot machination from “Prisoners”, and that is why I left the screening room with growing dissatisfaction at last night.

small_Prisoners02

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Cats and kittens in the afternoon(2013/10/01)

null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null null
There are more kittens in the campus…
Posted in Photos | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Behind the Candelabra (2013) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4) : Behind his sparkling showmanship

behindthecandelbra01

“Behind the Candelabra” is as dazzlingly entertaining as its flamboyant entertainer hero who ironically hid himself through the bold, colorful, and sparkling presentation of his personality on the stage. When we see one of Liberace’s stage performances full of glamour and sparkles along with the candelabra on his fancy piano, it is almost transparent that he is a homosexual, but, despite constant rumors about his sexuality, his fans and others mostly accepted his public denial, and that went on until his AIDS-related death in 1987(he tried to cover that fact from public even after his death, by the way).

Based on the book written by Scott Thorson and Alex Thorleifson, the movie focuses on a crucial romantic relationship during the later years of Liberace’s life. It is 1977, and Scott Thorson(Matt Damon), a good-looking 17-year-old boy hoping to be a veterinarian while working as an animal-trainer, happens to meet Liberace(Michael Douglas) through a Hollywood producer named Bob Black(Scott Bakula), who has been Thorson’s close friend after their incidental encounter at a local gay bar. After taking care of the eye problem of one of Liberace’s dogs, Thorson starts to win Liberace’s favor, and then he soon works as Liberace’s ‘assistant’ while living with him.

Thorson may be naive compared to others around him, but he is well aware of his new position as Liberace’s latest lover, and he gladly enjoys the excessive luxury inside Liberace’s mansion in Las Vegas, which looks like a big, wide royal palace filled with expensive furnitures, decorations, and clothes. He soon gets his own house and cars thanks to his lover’s generosity, and he also appears with him on the stage as a part of the show.

behindthecandelabra03

Despite their considerable age difference(Liberace was approaching 60 around that time), there is genuine mutual affection between Thorson and Liberace. From his lover, Thorson sees an aging man who always needs someone to stand by him(and sleep with him), and he willingly gives his lover whatever he wants while showered with the presents from him. In addition, because he grew up without his parents when he was young, Liberace becomes a father figure to him, and Liberace, who seems to really love him, even seriously considers legally adopting Thorson as his son – or his lifetime partner, shall we say.

But the story becomes weirder and darker as their relationship is developed further. In a hilariously cringe-inducing moment, Liberace has his shady plastic surgeon Dr. Startz(Rob Lowe, who looks nefarious as much as he can) do a plastic surgery on Thorson for making Thorson look more similar to him, and the movie has some fun with the unpleasant details of plastic surgery process. Thorson later becomes addicted to the diet drugs prescribed to him by Dr. Startz, and his addiction problem puts more conflict on their strained relationship along with Liberace’s frequent promiscuity.

While it has the inherent quality of campy show business melodrama considering its subject, the screenplay by Richard LaGravenese stays neutral with its balanced view on Liberace and Thorson’s relationship amid sumptuous set designs and flamboyant costumes, and the movie is constantly enjoyable to watch thanks to Steven Soderbergh’s slick, competent direction(as usual, he also worked as the editor and the cinematographer of his movie). The ambience of the 1970s is recreated well on the screen along with Liberace’s showy stage performances, and late Marvin Hamlisch’s score functions well with other songs on the soundtrack(this is his last work, by the way).

behindthecandelabra07

Michael Douglas has received lots of acclaims including an Emmy award for this movie, and he certainly deserves them for many reasons. It is always pleasure to see an actor showing unexpected sides through good performance, and, as he sometimes did, Douglas shows here something we have never expected from him. Gliding with wig and make-ups and those shiny capes like a peacock, he not only looks convincing as Liberace but also gives us the complex portrait of a colorful show business man who can be caring and generous as well as manipulative and egoistic. Douglas deftly moves around theatricality and sincerity while revealing an interesting human being behind the caricature persona created by himself, and he is always entertaining to watch on the screen.

Opposite to Douglas, Matt Damon naturally looks less showy, but his earnest performance holds the ground while having a good chemistry with Douglas’. He surely feels a bit awkward at first(after all, he plays the character who was a teenager boy at the beginning), but he quickly immerses himself into the role as the story develops with passing years, and he is effective as a young man who is easily impressed, influenced, and manipulated by a larger-than-life figure he loves and cares about. Thorson’s gradual transformation along the plot is believable thanks to Damon’s performance, and he and Douglas never flinch from their respective characters as convincingly presenting the unstable relationship dynamics between them.

behindthecandelabra05 The supporting actors surrounding Douglas and Damon also leave some impression as they revolve around them. While Rob Lowe and Scott Bakula are easily recognizable, Dan Aykroyd is nearly unrecognizable as Liberace’s trusted agent Seymour Heller, and Debbie Reynolds is Liberace’s old doting mother who has probably never imagined that her talented son is not very interested in finding the girl of his life.

The movie ultimately comes to us as a humorous and touching love story between two men who still care about each other despite the bitter end of their relationship. Their final meeting scene not long before Liberace’s death especially feels poignant, and it is soon followed by the beautiful closing scene Liberace himself would have fully approved of.

Steven Soderbergh recently announced that he will retire from his directing career, and it seems “Behind the Candelbra” will be his last movie(Produced as a TV movie, it was aired on HBO in this May while being released in theaters outside US). Considering that he is not that old yet, it is possible that he will make a comeback later, but, anyway, this is surely the fantastic swan song from one of the talented directors of our time.

behindthecandelabra06

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Blue Jasmine (2013) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4) : A Streetcar Named Delusion

bluejasmin02Observing the unstable heroine of Woody Allen’s “Blue Jasmine” is akin to looking into a miserable mess beyond repair. While she had already been mired in self-delusion when her world suddenly collapsed, she still remains in that pathetic state even when she reaches for a chance for restart, and that is why the movie is morbidly compelling to watch although we don’t want to be around her even for 5 minutes.

With Tennessee Williams’ “A Streetcar Named Desire” as its major inspiration, the movie comes to us as one of the darkest stories from Woody Allen, who came back to US for this film after making several films in Europe. While the story is not entirely devoid of humor and the soundtrack feels as pleasant as its locations around San Francisco, this is essentially the tragedy of a deluded woman trapped in her hopeless situation by none other than herself, and it is sometimes not easy to laugh even though we clearly see how silly she looks as she is heading to another bottom point already set for her from the start.

Jasmine Francis, played magnificently by Cate Blanchett, had been the wife of a successful financial business man in New York, but things got pretty disastrous for her and her husband Hal(Alec Baldwin) recently. The luxurious life style they had enjoyed for years was in fact supported by Hal’s massive financial fraud, and her comfortable world was turned upside down as soon as her husband was arrested by FBI on one day.

Almost broke as a consequence, Jasmine decides to leave New York and flies to San Francisco for a new chance, but it does not look hopeful much to us, if not her. She has never had any real job since her marriage, and her plan to be a certified interior designer sounds quite unrealistic to say the least, and she has a serious mental problem as shown during the opening scene in which she keeps talking about herself and her life even though an old lady sitting next to her in the plane is not listening to her at all. Her unstable mind sometimes seems to go back to her luxurious years in New York, and that naturally makes the people around her baffled or embarrassed.

bluejasmin0wAt least, it is lucky for her that her younger sister Ginger(Sally Hawkins) lives in San Francisco and can provide her a place to stay for a while. Like her ex-husband Augie(Andrew Dice Clay), Ginger has lots of reasons to be angry about Jasmine’s recently deceased husband(he killed himself in prison), but, as a good sister, she lets Jasmine stay in her house although she sees that her sister is not changed much despite her crumbled position. Jasmine laments about how she becomes far poorer than before, but it seems to never cross her mind that she could have saved some money for her if she had not bought the first-class airplane ticket.

The movie goes back and forth between Jasmine’s pathetic present in San Francisco and her splendid but equally pathetic past in New York. Besides being a Wall Street crook, her husband was a lying philanderer, and everyone around Jasmine knew about his affairs as well as some dirty business behind his back, but she virtually chose to be deceived by not only him but also herself. Literally bathing in luxury, she could get anything she wanted thanks to him, and she was comfortable with that while looking down on her sister and brother-in-law.

Not so surprisingly, she instantly looks down on Ginger’s recent boyfriend Chili(Bobby Cannavale), a local mechanic whom she thinks is not good enough for her sister. Mainly due to her sister’s influence, Ginger finds herself drawn to Al(Louis C.K.), an amiable guy who looks more gentle and caring than Chili, and Jasmine also meets her possible second Mr. Right through an accidental encounter at one party.

bluejasmin03You can easily guess how the things will turn out in the end especially if you are familiar with Tennessee Williams’s play, but Woody Allen presents his heroine as a memorably incorrigible case study, and Cate Blanchett’s terrific performance elevates the story to a grand tragicomedy. Like Charlize Theron in Jason Reitman’s “Young Adult”(2011), which was also a dark comedy about a pathologically self-deluded heroine, Blanchett goes all the way to play an unlikable character we can hardly identify with, and she is consistently fascinating to watch as revealing her character’s many unhinged sides. Like she turned a blind eye to what was going on around her in New York, Jasmine does not even try to face her problems while continuously ingesting alcohol and pills, and that only causes her circumstance to get worse than before.

Woody Allen assembles the nice supporting cast around Blanchett. Sally Hawkins is fabulous as a realistic counterpart to Blanchett, and Bobby Cannavale and Andrew Dice Clay are solid as two ‘brutish’ working class guys immediately reminding us of Stanley Kowalski. Alec Baldwin gives his despicable character slick quality as required, and Michael Stuhlbarg is a dentist who comes to have a very misguided notion about his newly employed receptionist, and Peter Sarsgaard is a young diplomat whose wholesome political ambition is definitely not compatible with Jasmine’s checkered past.

While making many enjoyable comedy films, Woody Allen has made more serious attempts in his long, illustrious career, and “Blue Jasmine” can be viewed as one of them although it can be interpreted as a comedy. Beneath its laid-back humor, there is a dark, hopeless tragedy at its center, and the movie could be a lot more depressing experience if it were not for Allen’s lightweight approach. She is stuck on a streetcar named delusion, and I doubt she will ever get off from it.

bluejasmin05

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Our Sunhi (2013) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4) : Three guys and one pretty girl

oursunhi04 I usually hesitate in case of giving advice to others because, besides being quite reluctant about that due to the subsequent responsibility, I am not sure about whether I am a guy who knows the best. I may be willing to give an advice to other guy because I think I should, but I will probably ask myself first about whether I really know enough about him.

In case of Sun-hi, a lovely college girl played by Jeong Yu-mi in Hong Sang-soo’s new film “Our Sunhi”, I still do not know a lot about her even in the end; yes, she is pretty and likable, but she is somewhat elusive to us even though we have seen her different aspects since the day she arrives. I will certainly not give any advice to her even if she demands, but she frequently gets advices from three guys reaching for her and then baffled about her, and that is where the movie gets most of its laughs.

During the opening scene, we see her visit to the campus after some time of her absence since the graduation. After coming across her senior student Sang-woo(Lee Min-woo), she soon meets her former professor Choi Dong-hyeong(Kim Sang-joong), and she is very furious to Sang-woo later when they meet again by coincidence. Maybe it was a harmless prank in his view, but it was surely wrong to lie to her that Professor Choi was out of the town when she needed to see him right now, and you will agree that he richly deserves all the sound and fury from her.

Sun-hi was Professor Choi’s favorite student when she studied as an undergraduate student in the film academy department, and now she needs Professor Choi’s help. She decides to learn more about fillmmaking outside South Korea, so she requests him to write a nice recommendation letter for her enrollment in the graduate course in some American university.

oursunhi03 Professor Choi gladly accepts her request, and he quickly writes the recommendation letter for her and then gives it to her on the next day. It is a nice letter on the whole, but he does not exactly praise her talent or potential while clearly pointing out her weaknesses including shyness and indecisiveness, and we can see her confused reaction from her face as she reads it alone on the bench. She thinks he did not know well about her while writing it, but she is not so sure about herself either.

Anyway, they have another private conversation on that day, and Professor Choi agrees to write another version for her as they drink soju like many characters of Hong Sang-soo’s films did. After all, it did not take much time to write that recommendation letter, so he thinks he will satisfy her easily, but, in this time, he discovers that he has had some feeling toward her.

That change inside his mind results in one of the amusingly repetitive contrasts/comparisons in Hong’s playful plot which juggles not only these two characters but also two other main characters going around Sun-hi. Not long after her first meeting with Professor Choi, Sun-hi spots her former boyfriend Moon-soo(Lee Seon-gyoon), who is now a graduate student while recently making a debut as a movie director. They soon have a day drinking time together with beer, soju, and fried chicken, and it seems possible that there are still remaining feelings between them as we watch them eat, drink, and talk with each other.

oursunhi02 After parting with her, Moon-soo meets Jae-hak(Jeong Jae-yeong), who was their senior student and is now more or less than a loser intellectual living alone by himself(he separated from his wife lately). They drink soju together at a bar nearby during the same evening, and we get a very memorable long-take scene as they try to be articulate in spite of their inebriated state. Lee Seon-gyoon is simply hilarious as Moon-soo is trying to make his point about ‘digging deep’ for future, and I later came to learn that he and Jeong Jae-yong actually drank soju while going through several takes; while this surely proves that Hong Sang-soo is a director any recovering alcoholic actor should think twice about working with, these two actors deserve praises for managing to maintain good comic timing and effortless spontaneity during their alcoholic performances(Hong eventually used the last take because it was so good and so lively compared to the other previous takes thanks to his drunken actors).

As observing how the movie amused the audiences with its cheerfully repetitive humor during the screening at last night, I also thought about how Hong Sang-soo’s films have kept tickling me and others with their plain but humorous storytelling while rarely stepping out of his own small territory. His characters are usually associated with fillmmaking one way or another, and we frequently see them drinking soju(even Isabelle Huppert in “In Another Country”(2012) drank soju, and that was a priceless moment), and we chuckle about human silliness and embarrassment in their comic situations fueled by bottles of soju.

As I became more acquainted with his films, I came to appreciate and admire his movies more even though I was not as enthusiastic as others, and waiting for Hong Sang-soo’s new film in South Korea becomes as ritualistic as waiting for new Woody Allen’s film in US. While less stylish and less distinctive on the surface than his contemporary South Korean directors such as Park Chan-wook or Bong Joon-ho, he has been consistent and diligent while establishing a solid renowned career through his small but witty and intelligent films released every year, and notable South Korean actors willingly work with him even if they get paid less than usual.

oursunhi05 Hong usually work with a small group of actors(there are only nine actors in the film, by the way), and they are delightful to watch. While Kim Sang-joong, Jeong Yu-mi, and Lee Seon-gyoon give good comedy performances as they did in their previous respective collaborations with Hong, Jeong Jae-yeong and Lee Min-woo get along well with their fellow cast members, and Ye Ji-won also provides a small extra dose of humor as the bar owner who just sits besides the main characters while ordering fried chicken, which is one of the running gags in the film.

Maybe I still have lots of things to learn for digging deeply into Hong’s films and I cannot decide on whether they are profoundly simple or simply profound, but I can say I like his films, and I think “Our Sunhi” is one of more enjoyable ones in his interesting career. I enjoyed how the characters are rolled around without perceiving the whole circumstance of theirs in its lightweight human farce, and, above all, it reminds me that Seoul has at least one nice place for stroll. To a guy who always thinks that Seoul is a dreadfully abstract environment covered with the forests of tasteless concrete apartment buildings, that’s a nice achievement to say the least.

oursunhi01

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

The Conjuring (2013) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4) : A usual business in the ominous haunted house

theconjuring03Maybe I am too jaded as a seasoned audience and amateur critic, but I could not help but be sarcastic about the prologue of “The Conjuring”, which kindly emphasizes to us that everything depicted in the movie is based on a real-life incident. Seriously, how could I believe its serious statements when it was pretty clear that it would go into the familiar supernatural territory of “The Exorcist”(1973), “The Amityville Horror”(1979), and other countless horror films about malevolently dilapidated houses or insidiously disturbing possessions?

Speaking of “The Amityville Horror”, “The Conjuring” is based on one of those questionable incidents reported by the very couple who inspired that movie: Ed and Lorraine Warren. They gained their ‘reputation’ as paranormal investigators while publishing several books on their investigations, but I have no idea about whether they witnessed real supernatural incidents or whether they just thought they did. Sure, you may enjoy their stories, but you cannot possibly serious about a demonic werewolf or a haunted house when there is no credible scientific evidence to support their claims.

Anyway, the movie believes in its supernatural elements, and it did a credible job of constructing an insidious house made of various horror movie conventions at the remote rural place in Harrisville, Rhode Island. This house looks pretty nice from the outside, and its interior does not look bad though it needs some more repair and remodeling, but you know they are going to be in trouble because 1) the family dog is reluctant about going inside the house, and 2) they find a hidden entrance to the basement where lots of suspicious things have been stored, and 3) there is an old big tree outside the house which looks like being imported from “Sleepy Hollow”(1999), and 4) the youngest daughter finds a grimy music box toy which sounds pretty good even though it seemed to be manufactured at least 100 years ago.

theconjuring04Understandably, everything looks fine to the Perron family during their first days at the house. Carolyn and Roger(Lili Taylor and Ron Livingston) are glad to buy this house at a reasonable price through a local bank auction, and their lovely five daughters get quickly accustomed to their new environment. Too bad they are living in the 1970s – they would instantly recognize minor but disturbing signs around them if they were familiar with “The Amityville Horror” or other subsequent haunted house movies.

But, like any normal people would in their circumstance, they slowly come to recognize that there is something in their house. They hear voices and sounds during nights, and they keep having a problem with the temperature maintenance in the house, and they also smell something stinking. Furthermore, Carolyn finds inexplicable bruises on her body whenever she wakes up in the morning, and her youngest daughter talks with an unseen entity as her new friend when she is alone.

And that is just the beginning, and the Perrons’ circumstance gets worse and worse. One of their notably sensible reactions is that they immediately approach to the experts of paranormal activities, who are none other than Ed and Lorraine Warren(Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga). After handling some bad case a few months ago, Ed and Lorraine decide to take a break while giving lectures from time to time, but they feel the urgency when they meet Carolyn after one of their lectures, so they go to the Perron family house along with two other people assisting them. One of them is a police officer, and I must say it is rather refreshing to see a policemen in the movie willingly assisting the paranormal investigators in spite of his mild skepticism.

theconjuring01If you are an experienced moviegoer like me, I bet you have a pretty good idea about what will be served after that point. As a clairvoyant, Lorraine instantly senses an unknown malevolent force shrouding not only the house but also the Perrons, and she sees some disturbing hallucinations as she looks around the house and the surrounding environment. With the recording equipments set inside the house, Ed searches for the evidences which can get him a permission for exorcism from the Catholic Church. The dark history behind the house is revealed(an amusing IMDB trivia: “The state of Rhode Island does not require home sellers to disclose documented paranormal and supernatural hauntings to potential buyers.”), and the things become more perilous than before in the house whenever it gets dark, and, yes, Ed and Lorraine come to realize that it may be too late for the Perrons or themselves if they do not take care of this supernatural danger as soon as possible.

As the bodies and objects are moved around a lot on the screen during the second half, its credibility as a ‘real-life story’ is virtually thrown out of the window, but the director James Wan and his crew give us a competent haunted house movie which knows that good scary movie mainly depends on mood and suspense rather than shock. Its ominous atmosphere is well maintained on the screen, and the screenplay by Chad Hayes and Carey W. Hayes does not feel tedious as steadily tuning suspense and shock throughout the running time. Vera Farmiga, Patrick Wilson, Lili Taylor, Ron Livingston, and their co-actors are convincing in their earnest performances, and their characters are more than terrified cardboards. One nice scene is involved with Ed’s private office which looks like a museum of the damned objects, and I could see lots of potentials from that spooky place which must have many other supernatural stories to tell.

“The Conjuring”, which got R-rating even though it does not have any particularly gory scene, confirms again that the director James Wan has advanced a lot since his breakthrough film “Saw”(2004), a torture porn film I disliked. He is a good director who knows how to set the mood and how to assemble genre conventions for entertaining the audiences, but I think the movie could have been a little more than that. It goes without saying that this is a well-made film, but I could never get wholly engaged with what happened on the screen, and I did not get scared enough to recommend it to you. What the hell, some of you don’t probably watch more than 5 horror films every year unlike me, you may be more scared or entertained than I was.

theconjuring05

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments