The Hole in the Ground (2019) ☆☆(2/4): He doesn’t feel like her son…

theholeintheground03

Right from its very first shot, “The Hole in the Ground” is fully shrouded in moody and ominous ambience, and that is one of a few good things I can say about the film. As initially sensing that something bad is going to happen sooner or later, you will probably have some expectation, but, sadly, the movie does not go much beyond its nice creepy atmosphere, and the overall result is a rather superficial and mediocre horror tale which could be told within the half of its 90-minute running time.

During the opening scene, we are introduced to a young woman named Sarah O’Neill (Seána Kerslake) and her little son Chris (James Quinn Markey). Although she does not talk much about her past, it is implied that she recently left her husband due to domestic abuse, and now she tries to make a new start for her and her dear son after moving to a shabby house located in some remote area, but things are still not that good for them. While he has difficulty in adjusting himself to a new environment, Chris often misses his father, and that certainly causes some strain between him and his mother.

When they are going back to their house after having some good time at a local amusement park, Sarah and Chris have a very disturbing encounter with some old lady on the road, and Sarah later learns more about that old lady. Many years ago, she tried to kill her young son just because she somehow came to believe that he was not her son, and that subsequently led to an irreversible tragedy for her and her husband.

theholeintheground02

Of course, as you have already guessed, a similar situation soon happens to Sarah. In the middle of one night, she hears a strange sound, and then she discovers that her son is disappeared. After trying to find her son outside for a while, she eventually tries to call the police for help, but then, what do you know, her son appears again. Although she is relieved to see that her son is all right, she is also quite baffled about what exactly happened, and then she comes to sense that something is not so right about her son. Sure, he looks mostly same as before, but he feels, well, a bit different in several aspects, and Sarah becomes more suspicious and nervous about him – especially after they have another disturbing encounter with that old lady.

Now you will probably have a pretty good idea on where the story is heading, and I assure you that the movie does not stray far from whatever you expect. There is a chilly sequence where Sarah happens to witness something quite unnerving from her son’s room at one night, and then there later comes a dark moment of paranoia as Sarah is driven further into her growing doubt and suspicion in the middle of a special event held at her son’s school.

Not so surprisingly, there is no one to listen to Sarah, and we accordingly get a few interesting scenes which make us wonder whether her viewpoint is really reliable. When she tries to convince one certain supporting character at one point, the movie does not directly show us what was shot by her small video camera during the previous night, and you may have some reasonable doubt on her circumstance. Is it possible that she is merely being hysterical due to those mental burdens on her fragile status?

theholeintheground01

Unfortunately, the movie simply goes along its predictable plot without much ambiguity, especially after a certain tense scene which does not leave any doubt at all on whatever is happening around Sarah. While I appreciate how it steadily maintains its sinister ambience throughout its running time, it does not have much narrative momentum as plodding from one narrative point to another, and, above all, its characters remain to be more or less than plot elements instead of being engaging enough to hold our attention. As constantly immersed in the monotonous moodiness surrounding her, Sarah does not particularly feel like a well-developed character, and so do a few substantial supporting characters in the film.

Oh, I forgot to mention that, as reflected by the title of the movie, there is a big, mysterious sinkhole in a forest right next to Sarah’s house. Because it is quite apparent from the beginning that this sinkhole is involved with her increasingly disturbing situation in one way or another, it is not much of a spoiler to tell you that this sinkhole plays an important role during the last act of the film, and I have to tell you that the movie is underwhelming even at that point without much shock or surprise for us.

As the center of the movie, Seána Kerslake is effective whenever she gives us some glimpse into her character’s vulnerability, and it is a shame that the movie does not utilize well her considerable talent. In case of young actor James Quinn Markey, he is unfortunately stuck with a thankless role which only demands him to look insidious, and I was also disappointed to see how Kati Outinen, a Finnish actress mainly known for her memorable performances in the works of Aki Kaurismäki such as “The Match Factory Girl” (1990) and “Le Havre” (2011), is utterly wasted in her disposable supporting role.

“The Hole in the Ground” is directed by Lee Cronin, who also wrote the screenplay along with Stephen Shields. This is his first feature film, and, even though I was dissatisfied a lot with it, I admired its competent technical aspects to some degree at least. I can only hope that he will soon move onto better things after this lukewarm debut of his.

theholeintheground04

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Paddleton (2019) ☆☆☆(3/4): Two close friends facing mortality

paddleton03

“Paddleton”, which had its premiere at the Sundance Film Festival in last month and then released on Netflix on this Friday, is a little character drama about two close friends suddenly facing mortality and then trying to deal with it. While we get a number of amusing moments as these two characters frequently push and pull each other over their impending matter, their story later becomes something more poignant than expected, and we are consequently moved as observing how deep their emotional bond is.

Mark Duplass and Ray Romano play Michael and Andy, two ordinary bachelors who have been quite close to each other since Michael came to live right below Andy’s residence in their apartment building some years ago. The early part of the film shows us how they often spend their free time together, and we are rather amused as noticing that they are pretty much like a couple in many ways even though they are just longtime friends. While it often looks like there is not anyone around them in their mundane life, they are very comfortable with being with each other alone, and they are happy whenever they watch their favorite old kung fu flick together or play their own squash tennis game called ‘Paddleton’ at an abandoned outdoor movie theater.

However, as shown in the opening scene, there comes a bad news for Michael. After getting examined at a hospital, he is told that he has seriously ill due to cancer, and it soon turns out that he does not have much time to live. Although looking calmer than his friend when he heard this bad news, Michael is quite devastated and depressed nonetheless, and he eventually comes to consider ending his life before his condition becomes far worse.

paddleton05

While understandably reluctant to lose his friend, Andy agrees to help Michael. For getting the enough amount of a certain drug for his euthanasia, Michael needs to go to some resort town outside their neighborhood, and Andy willingly accompanies his friend during what may be their last journey. Shortly after arriving in that town, they get that certain drug along with a couple of other drugs to help Michael’s euthanasia, and then they come to spend the night at a local hotel.

Leisurely moving from one episodic moment to another along with its two main characters, the movie generates several nice moments for small good laughs. I liked how comedy and drama are deftly mixed together during the scene unfolded at a local pharmacy, and I was also tickled a bit by a silly scene involved with a woman running the hotel.

In the meantime, the movie also recognizes how serious Michael and Andy’s situation is. While Michael becomes more determined to stick to his plan, Andy wants his friend to have second thoughts on that, and he tries as much as he can in his own passive way. Constantly standing by his friend, he also buys a small pink safe just for distracting Michael’s mind from his euthanasia plan, and that leads to a moment which initially looks absurd but eventually heartbreaking as they come to let out their respective feelings about the inevitable end of their friendship.

What follows after that dramatic highpoint is handled with considerable care and sensitivity. Through their brief but meaningful emotional journey, Andy comes to respect what his friend wants, and the movie gives us a series of quiet but touching moments under the thoughtful direction of director/co-writer Alex Lehmann, who previously made a modest but notable feature film debut with “Blue Jay” (2016).

paddleton06

The movie depends a lot on its two lead performers, and they ably carry the film together with their engaging duo performance. Duplass, who wrote the screenplay with Lehmann while also participating in the production of the film along with his brother Jay Duplass and his co-star, steadily holds the ground with his understated performance, and he did a good job of subtly conveying to us his character’s growing melancholy along with some sense of humor. While he is aware more and more of his approaching death, Michael also wants to live as much as he can, and that is exemplified well by a humorously awkward moment when Michael tries to draw others’ attention as telling them about that favorite old kung fu flick of his.

Opposite to Duplass, Ray Romano, who has been mainly known for TV sitcom series “Everybody Loves Raymond”, is equally solid while showing his more serious side as he previously did in “The Big Sick” (2017). He and Duplass are always interesting to watch as their characters interact in one way or another on the screen, and we can always sense the long history between their characters, which is the main reason why the last act of the film works so well on the emotional level.

Although it may require some patience for its dry and earnest storytelling approach as well as its rather slow narrative pacing, “Paddleson” is worthwhile to watch for its genuine intimate moments, and I appreciate what is achieved by Lehmann, Duplass, and Romano here in this film. In short, this is a simple but solid piece of work worthwhile to watch for a number of good reasons, and I recommend you to give it a chance someday.

paddleton01

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Creed II (2018) ☆☆☆(3/4): Fathers and sons with issue

creed201

“Creed II” is a safe sequel mostly making predictable moves inside its genre conventions. Although it is understandably less refreshing and surprising compared to what was magnificently achieved in its 2015 predecessor, the movie is still fairly entertaining mainly thanks to the strong presence of its several main cast members, and I enjoyed it enough even while having some reasonable doubt on whatever will follow after this.

The movie opens with the latest boxing match of its hero Adonis Creed (Michael B. Jordan), who is about to play against the current world heavyweight champion. Although he is nervous about whether he will win the match, he gets some support from not only his mentor Robert “Rocky” Balboa (Sylvester Stallone) but also his musician girlfriend Bianca Taylor (Tessa Thompson), and, not so surprisingly, he eventually wins after knocking out his opponent in the ring.

Shortly after this glorious victory of his, Creed proposes to Bianca, and, after her acceptance, they come to think more serious about their future life, but then there comes an unexpected challenger for him. The challenger is a young Russian boxer named Viktor Drago (Florian “Big Nasty” Munteanu), and, what do you know, he is the son of Ivan Drago (Dolph Lundgren), who killed Creed’s father Apollo Creed (Carl Weathers) during their match but was subsequently defeated by Rocky as shown in “Rocky IV” (1985). Still quite bitter and resentful about his downfall resulted from his defeat, Ivan wants to get his revenge via his son whom he has trained for years in Ukraine, and we accordingly get a tense moment when he confronts Rocky at Rocky’s restaurant in Philadelphia.

creed202

While Rocky sees no particular necessity in responding to his old opponent, Creed, who has been like another son to Rocky since they met in “Creed” (2015), has a different opinion. Right from when he watches Viktor’s challenge on TV, he feels the need to fight against Viktor, and that need is further boosted by Buddy Marcelle (Russell Hornsby), a slick promoter quite eager to hold a big match between Creed and Viktor. When Creed eventually accepts Viktor’s challenge, he asks Rocky to be his trainer again, but Rocky declines to help him, so Creed goes instead to Tony “Little Duke” Evers (Wood Harris), the son of the trainer who worked with Rocky as well as Creed’s father.

At this point, I bet you have already guessed what will follow next, especially if you watched “Rocky” (1976) and its several sequels. Yes, we are served with an obligatory training montage sequence alternating between Creed and Viktor. Yes, our hero comes to realize his misjudgment as soon as his big match with Viktor begins in the ring, and he surely pays a heavy price for that while Bianca and Rocky watch his consequent physical suffering in horror. Yes, he becomes quite depressed as struggling to recover, and there naturally come several moments of self-reflection. Yes, he comes to find his strength again in the end, and then he prepares for another match as trained by Rocky – and we get another obligatory training montage sequence as expected.

Although frequently trudging especially during its middle act, the screenplay by Juel Taylor and Sylvester Stallone, which is based on the story by Sascha Penn and Cheo Hodari Coker, keeps paying attention to its main characters at least. The scenes between Creed and Bianca are presented with a considerable amount of warm, sweet intimacy, and the movie generates some poignancy as Creed and Bianca try to adjust themselves to parenthood after Bianca’s unexpected pregnancy. Although a subplot involved with Rocky’s reluctance about getting reconnected with his only son is rather clichéd, it is handled with enough care and understanding, and Stallone, who was Oscar-nominated twice for playing his iconic character in “Rocky” and “Creed”, is engaging in his understated performance.

creed203

As the center of the movie, Michael B. Jordan, who has rose to more prominence thanks to his collaboration with Ryan Coogler in “Fruitvale Station” (2013), “Creed”, and “Black Panther” (2018), is reliable as usual, and he did a good job of balancing his character well between resilience and vulnerability. Besides looking as believable and committed as demanded during three boxing match sequences in the film, he also has nice chemistry with Tessa Thompson, and Thompson, who has been a new talent to watch since her memorable performance in “Dear White People” (2014), holds her own place well around Jordan and Stallone while having her own moment to shine later in the movie.

Other notable performers in the film fill their broad archetype characters as required. While Russell Hornsby, who has been more notable since his good supporting performance in “Fences” (2016), looks suitably smooth and smarmy, Phylicia Rashad, who plays Creed’s unflappable but caring stepmother, and Wood Harris are also solid in their respective supporting roles, and Dolph Lundgren, who surely has some fun here just like he did when he appeared along with Stallone in “The Expendables” (2010) and its two sequels, and Florian “Big Nasty” Munteanu are an effective counterpart to Stallone and Jordan.

Under the competent direction of Steven Caple Jr., who replaced Coolger after Coogler left for making “Black Panther”, “Creed II” did its job as well as intended, and, considering its big box office success in US in last year, I will not be that surprised if it is followed by another sequel. To be frank with you, I do not expect much, but I will not complain if that movie is as good as “Creed II” at least instead of becoming as pointless as those disposable sequels to “Rocky”.

 

creed2034

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Ben Is Back (2018) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4): When her addict son is back

benisback01

“Ben Is Back” works best when it focuses on the troubled family relationship between its two main characters. As they struggle to do their best despite their longtime problem which will not be easily solved, the movie handles their circumstance with considerable sensitivity and sincerity, but then it makes a wrong move during its second half, and that is a shame considering the diligent efforts from its two lead performers.

In the beginning, we meet Holy Burns (Julia Roberts), a plain suburban woman living with her second husband Neal (Courtney B. Vance) and her three children. It is Christmas Eve, and she surely hopes for a nice Christmas Eve evening with her loving family, but then there suddenly comes Ben (Lucas Hedges), who is her oldest child and has had a serious drug addiction problem since he got hooked on painkiller after a minor accident several years ago. He looks fine now thanks to his recent time at a rehabilitation center, but his sister Ivy (Kathryn Newton) and Neal are rather skeptical in contrast to Holy, who is certainly cautious but happy to see her son again anyway.

Frankly recognizing his problem and those damages caused by that, Ben tries to get along well with his family members, and there is a warm, intimate scene where he has a little fun time with his two young half-siblings, but he is often reminded of what may happen at any point because of the urge still remaining inside him. When he and Ivy go to the attic for getting some decoration items for their Christmas tree at one point, he becomes very uncomfortable because he used to hide his drugs in the attic, and it is clear to us that he is still quite emotionally vulnerable to his drug addiction.

benisback02

After discussing with her husband on how to handle her son’s unexpected visit, Holy decides to put some restriction on her son. While he is allowed to spend Christmas Eve and the following day along with her and their family, he has to go through a drug test for confirming his current sober condition, and he also has to be always around his mother just in case. Although he is rather reluctant at first, he follows his mother’s demands anyway, and things look a bit more hopeful as they later go together to a local mall for buying additional Christmas gifts.

They also attend a local meeting for recovering drug addicts, and the movie gives us a good scene where Ben and several other recovering drug addicts frankly tell about their drug addiction problem and current status. While Holy is certainly proud of her son being on the way to more sobriety, he is a little embarrassed as trying to be clean and honest in front of his fellow recovering drug addicts, and there subsequently comes an awkward moment when he encounters someone to whom he sold drugs once during his dark period in the past.

And it turns out that the past is not wholly through with him. When he and his family come back from a local church in the evening, they are shocked to find that someone broke into their house, and Ben has a pretty good idea on who is responsible for this break-in. When he was at the local mall with his mother, he happened to be spotted by an old addict friend of his, who must have told about Ben’s return to some people who do not welcome that much.

The second half of the movie revolves around Ben and Holy’s attempt to handle their imminent problem. As requested by Ben, Holy drives him to several spots in their neighborhood, and she comes to see how messy and problematic her son’s situation still is. Not so surprisingly, he turns out to be less honest to her than he initially seemed, and she accordingly becomes more frustrated and exasperated than before.

benisback04

Around that narrative point, the screenplay by director/writer Peter Hedges, who previously directed “Pieces of April” (2003) and “Dan in Real Life” (2007), takes several contrived plot turns, and that is where the movie becomes less effective and engaging. While there are still a few good moments such as when Holy seeks some help from an acquaintance of hers who lost a daughter to drug addiction, the movie still does not work as well as it did during its first half, and its ending is rather artificial and unsatisfying in my trivial opinion.

The two lead performers of the movie do their best for carrying the movie together. While Julia Roberts, who has been less prominent during recent years but has not lost any of her talent as shown from her Oscar-nominated turn in “Auguest: Osage County” (2013), steadily holds the ground, Lucas Hedges, who is Hedges’ son and has been quite notable since his Oscar-nominated breakthrough turn in “Manchester by the Sea” (2016), functions well as an effective counterpart, and they are always believable in their characters’ strained interactions throughout the movie. In case of the other main performers in the film, Courtney B. Vance and Kathryn Newton did a bit more than what is required from their thankless roles, and Rachel Bay Jones, a veteran actress who recently won a Tony Award for Broadway musical “Dear Evan Hansen”, is also fine in her small scene with Roberts later in the story.

While it is surely a sincere and sensitive drama about family and addiction, “Ben Is Back” is still a little too disappointing for me to recommend mainly due to its flawed storytelling. There is surely a better movie somewhere inside the overall result, and, to be frank with you, I think the movie could be better if it put more trust and confidence on its two lead performers.

benisback03

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Cold Pursuit (2019) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4): A redundant remake starring Liam Neeson

coldpursuit01

“Cold Pursuit”, which is the remake version of Norwegian film “In Order of Disappearance” (2014), is fairly watchable but not particularly necessary. Because I happened to watch the original version and then write about it a few days ago, I was certainly well aware of what I was going to get from the remake version, and it did not exceed my expectation much despite a few interesting variations to mention.

While the background is changed from Norway to US, the story of the remake version is pretty much same as that of the original version. When Nelson Coxman (Liam Neeson), a plain ordinary middle-aged man who has run a successful snow ploughing business in a small rural mountain town of Colorado, is about to receive the Citizen of the Year award on one snowy day, everything seems all right to him and his wife Grace (Laura Dern), and we soon see him giving a humble speech at the following ceremony, but then a terrible thing happens to him and his wife on the very next day. Their son, who works in a local airport, died due to drug overdose, and they are quite shocked and devastated while also wondering whether they really knew their dear son.

As subsequently getting estranged from his wife, Coxman becomes more morose and depressed, so he is almost driven to suicide at one point, but then he encounters his son’s close colleague/friend, who confides to Coxman that he got himself and his innocent friend into a small but serious trouble with a local drug organization. After coming to learn what really happened to his son, Coxman becomes quite determined to revenge his son’s death, and he soon goes to Denver for finding an organization member who killed his son.

coldpursuit02

While Coxman eventually finds and then kills that guy in question (after all, he is played by Liam Neeson, isn’t he?), that is just the beginning of his vengeful quest. He is willing to kill every organization member involved with his son’s death in one way or another, and it goes without saying that his ultimate target is the leader of the organization, who is nicknamed “Viking” (Tom Bateman) and certainly quite concerned about the sudden inexplicable disappearance of several key members of his organization.

After wondering what is really happening for a while, Viking comes to suspect the other big local drug organization led by an old native American guy named White Bull (Tom Jackson). He decides to give a hard warning to White Bull and White Bull’s organization, and White Bull and his goons naturally become quite angry and furious when one of their organization members gets killed just because of that.

As the circumstance surrounding Coxman and other main characters become more chaotic and complicated, we get a series of morbidly humorous scenes including the one where Coxman gets some advice from his ex-criminal brother Brock (William Forsythe), but the movie adamantly sticks to its solemn deadpan attitude. Whenever a character dies, that is always followed by a brief obituary on the black screen, and we accordingly become more amused as this is repeated throughout the film like the refrain of a twisted funeral march.

The adapted screenplay by Frank Baldwin, which is based on Kim Fupz Aakeson’s original screenplay, did a fairly good job of transferring the story and characters of the original version to its American background, and director Hand Petter Moland, who directed the original version, establishes well the stark wintry atmosphere on the screen with his cinematographer Philip Øgaard, who was also the cinematographer of the original version. While mostly sounding as serious as required, George Fenton’s score often becomes ironically cheerful, and the movie also utilizes several pop songs and classic pieces of music well enough to earn some chuckles from us.

coldpursuit06

And I enjoyed the notable variations in Baldwin’s adapted screenplay. Via White Bull and his goons, the movie throws some indirect social/historical comments, and that is especially exemplified well by a brief but acerbic moment when White Bull glances at a souvenir gift shop item with disdain and disgust. In case of two local police officers in the film, they are presented as more developed characters compared to their counterparts in the original version, and Emmy Rossum and John Doman are engaging to watch in their contrasting roles.

However, the movie still feels redundant to me. I frequently noticed how much it is similar to the original version shot by shot, and I also observed that a few glaring flaws in the original version remain same as before. While it still has some narrative pacing problem during its middle act, its few female characters in the film besides Rossum’s character are more or less than the mere parts of the background, and it is particularly disappointing to see Laura Dern totally wasted in her thankless role.

Anyway, “Cold Pursuit” works to some degree thanks to Moland’s competent direction. While Neeson, who recently caused a big public relations disaster thanks to a very inappropriate comment, is reliable as much as he was in those recent grim, violent action thriller films including, yes, “Taken” (2008), Tom Batesman is darkly amusing during his several juicy scenes, and William Forsythe, Tom Jackson, and Domenick Lombardozzi are also fine in their respective supporting roles. In short, I did not feel that bad as I walked out of the screening room at last night, but I must remind you that you do not have to watch the movie if you already watched the original version.

coldpursuit04

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Svaha: The Sixth Finger (2019) ☆☆☆(3/4): A South Korean Occult Story

Svahathesixthfinger01

South Korean film “Svaha: The Sixth Finger” is filled with gloomy spookiness from the very beginning, and it did not disappoint me at all. While I am still not sure whether I understood all of its numerous religious details, this is an entertaining occult horror flick equipped with good mood, storytelling, and performance, and I followed its plot and characters with some curiosity and amusement during my viewing.

After the unnerving prologue sequence which has a couple of striking moments to disturb you, the movie introduces to us Pastor Park (Lee Jung-Jae), a Protestant minister who has run a small agency specializing in exposing suspicious or corrupt religious groups. Recently, a small local Buddhist cult group called the Deer Mount happened to draw his attention, and he thinks this will give him a nice opportunity to get some money from those prominent Buddhist monks, who are wary of cult groups as much as other influential religious leaders for maintaining their good public image.

Along with his assistant Yo-sub (David Lee), Pastor Park delves deeper into his latest investigation target while also getting the support and approval from those prominent Buddhist monks thanks to his friend Monk Haean (Jin Seon-Kyu), who often provides background information and knowledge to Pastor Park and, of course, us. As he investigates the Deer Mount further, Pastor Park happens to obtain its heretical scripture, and then he comes to learn more about its long but relatively unknown history, which mainly revolves around its mysterious founder who wrote that heretical scripture in question.

Svahathesixthfinger02

Meanwhile, the movie adds more spookiness to the story as the body of an adolescent girl is found in a nearby local area, and we are not so surprised when it eventually turns out that her death is involved with the Deer Mount. We meet a certain key cult member quite determined to do anything for what he believes, and, through Pastor Park’s ongoing investigation, we get to know more about that guy and other three key cult members, who all turn out to be very closely connected with the founder of the Deer Mount.

And there is Geun-Hwa (Lee Jae-In), a young girl living in a small rural village along with her grandparents who have taken care of her since her parents died shortly after her birth. As she already told us at the beginning of the movie, she has lived with a big dark secret since she was conceived in her mother’s womb, and that secret affects not only her and her grandparents but also the village as shown from the opening sequence.

As these three main plotlines slowly come to converge together as expected, the movie gradually dials up the level of tension, and director/writer Jang Jae-Hyun, who previously directed “The Priests” (2015), serves us a number of spooky moments to be savored. I liked how he effectively uses those vividly striking religious murals for establishing the insidious ambience surrounding the main characters of the movie, and I also enjoyed a disturbingly hallucinatory moment featuring a bunch of dark, shadowy figures crawling from the ceiling of a dark, isolated room.

I must point out that Jang’s screenplay trudges at times especially during its second half. Although it initially raises some interesting questions on good, evil, and, yes, God, it eventually comes to arrive at an ending which is a little too neat and simple in my trivial opinion, and, above all, it often tries a bit too much of exposition as if it were afraid of getting us confused or disinterested. As a result, the movie is rather uneven in its narrative pacing, and I felt impatient from time to time during its last 40 minutes.

Svahathesixthfinger04

Nevertheless, the movie still engaged me with mood and details to be appreciated. I observed numerous religious details in the film with considerable fascination, and I and other audiences were occasionally amused by several small humorous scenes in the film including the awkward meeting between Pastor Park and a very influential Buddhist monk who may give him the crucial information about the founder of the Deer Mount.

The main performers in the movie diligently fill their respective roles with each own presence. While Lee Jung-jae, who was solid in “New World” (2012), “The Thieves” (2012), and “Assassination” (2015), holds the ground with his fine performance, David Lee and Hwang Jung-Min, who plays Pastor Park’s another assistant, are also effective in their supporting roles, and Jin Seon-Kyu, who recently appeared in “Extreme Job” (2018), handles his expositive scenes well while also showing some sense of humor. As Park Jung-Min, who drew my attention with his substantial supporting role in “Bleak Night” (2010), brings considerable intensity to his character, Lee Jae-In, who impressed me a lot with her excellent comic performance in “Adulthood” (2017), is compelling in her rather tricky part, and she surely confirms to us again that she is indeed a talented young actress to watch.

On the whole, “Svaha: The Sixth Finger”, whose title comes from a Sanskrit lexical term used in Hinduism and Buddhism as a denouement at the end of a mantra, is a competent genre piece distinguishing itself well with its own distinctive local elements. Although it did not scare me that much, it still amused and entertained me nonetheless, and I think it is one of better South Korean horror films during recent years.

Svahathesixthfinger03

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

My prediction on the 91st Annual Academy Awards

roma02

The Oscar season of this year has been pretty wild and unpredictable. At first, “A Star is Born” seemed to be the front runner, but then “Green Book” and “Bohemian Rhapsody” stole the show at the Golden Globe Awards, and then “Black Panther” triumphed at the Screen Actors Guild Awards, and then “The Favourite” and “Roma” gained more momentum at the British Academy Film Awards, while “Vice” and “BlacKkKlansman” received considerable support as shown from their respective multiple nominations.

And there were also a number of troubles involved with Oscar during last several months. We rolled our eyes due to that misguided attempt to introduce a new category for popular blockbuster films, and then we shook our heads when it was decided that there would be no host for the ceremony after Kevin Hard stepped down because of his idiotic homophobic comment, and then many of us were quite outraged when it was announced that no less than four Oscar presentations would be done during commercials (Fortunately, this ridiculous decision was subsequently reversed thanks to the following protest from many people including some prominent figures in Hollywood).

In conclusion, this is probably the most chaotic Oscar season during the 2010s, and I guess anything may happen at the Dolby theater in LA on February 25th. Yes, I am still not so sure about many categories, but I give you my Oscar Prediction anyway, and let’s see how accurate my prediction is. I am ready to be surprised, you know. Continue reading →

Posted in Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment

In Order of Disappearance (2014) ☆☆☆(3/4): A deadpan Norwegian revenge drama

inorderofdisappearance04

Norwegian film “In Order of Disappearance” is a deadpan revenge drama sprinkled with a cold, morbid sense of black humor. While as stark, brutal, and violent as expected, the movie serves us a number of dryly absurd moments along with considerable mood and style to be appreciated, and it is often darkly amusing to observe its slow but relentless march to the inevitable finale.

At the beginning, the movie solemnly shows another snowy winter day in some rural region of Norway, and then we meet Nils Dickman (Stellan Skarsgård), who has run a successful snow ploughing business for years and is about to receive the Citizen of the Year award for his considerable contribution to the local community. Everything looks fine as he humbly receives the award in front of others including his wife, but he and his wife are notified on the very next day that their only son died of drug overdose, and they are certainly shocked and devastated by this tragic news.

Shortly after his son’s funeral, Dickman is almost driven to suicide attempt, but then he comes to learn the truth about his son’s death from his son’s close friend/colleague, who got Dickman’s son involved with a local drug organization without telling him anything. Dickman soon becomes quite determined to revenge his son’s death, and we subsequently see him tracking down and then killing those gang members responsible for his son’s death one by one. In addition to several firearms, he also has a big snow plough, and we later get a calm but tense moment when he calmly drives his snow plough right behind his target’s vehicle without drawing any suspicion from his target.

inorderofdisappearance01

As Dickman is gradually executing his revenge, the boss of that local drug organization, nicknamed “the Count” (Pål Sverre Hagen), is understandably baffled about the serial disappearance of his several henchmen, and he comes to suspect a rival organization led by an old Servian boss nicknamed “Papa” (Bruno Ganz). That eventually leads to the unfortunate death of a key member of Papa’s drug organization, and the situation later becomes more unstable and complicated as Papa and his henchmen vow for retaliation.

Even at that point, the movie keeps its attitude straight as patiently unfolding the increasingly chaotic circumstance surrounding Dickman and other main characters in the film, and we get some small dry laughs from several amusing scenes including the ones showing the Count’s problematic domestic life with his ex-wife and their young son. He simply wants to be a good father to his son, but, alas, he only finds himself becoming more distant to his son while mostly occupied with his imminent business trouble, and his son does not seem to care much about him.

When the Servian gangs finally arrive to deal with the Count and his organization later in the story, the mood accordingly becomes more intense as required, and the movie does not flinch at all from those brutal moments of violence, but it still does not lose any of its black humor. Whenever a character is killed in the film, a brief obituary appears on the black screen, and that feels like more a twisted refrain as the body count in the movie continues to increase along the plot.

inorderofdisappearance05

While clearly influenced by the works of the Coen Brothers such as, yes, “Fargo” (1996), the movie is equipped with its own distinctive qualities. Although most of other characters in the film besides Dickman are more or less than broad caricatures to get killed sooner or later, they are presented with some colorful personality at least, and I was especially amused by a brief scene showing the unexpected romantic relationship between two certain supporting characters. Thanks to cinematographer Philip Øgaard, the movie is constantly shrouded in icy wintry atmosphere, and its chilly impression is further accentuated by the frequent wide shots of vast snowy landscapes.

The main performers of the movie steadily maintain their straight appearance throughout the film as demanded. While Stellan Skarsgård diligently holds the center with his understated performance, Pål Sverre Valheim has several juicy moments as his character becomes more nervous and agitated along the story, and I also enjoyed the solid supporting performances from Peter Andersson, who plays Dickman’s ex-criminal brother, and Bruno Ganz, a legendary swiss actor who recently passed away.

By the way, the screenplay by Kim Fupz Aakeson has some notable flaws which distracted me from time to time. While it drags for a while during the middle part, it does not handle well its few female characters including Dickman’s wife, and the same thing can be said about two simple-minded police officers in the film, who are nothing more than redundant comic relief.

Although it may be a little too chilly for some of you, “In Order of Disappearance” has enough style and substance thanks to the skillful direction of director Hans Petter Moland, who recently made its American remake version starring Liam Neeson. Although I often observed its story and characters from the distance, I was entertained by its well-made aspects at least, and that is enough for recommendation in my inconsequential opinion.

inorderofdisappearance02

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Border (2018) ☆☆☆(3/4): Two of a kind

border01

Swedish film “Border”, which won the Un Certain Regard award at the Cannes Film Festival early in last year, is an odd mix of character drama and supernatural horror. Although its attempt to mix these two different genres is not entirely successful due to its rather superficial narrative and characterization, I observed its main characters with some degree of fascination at least, and the movie did not disappoint me as doling out several weird and interesting moments to remember.

The story of the movie mainly revolves around a woman named Tina (Eva Melander), who works for the Swedish Border Agency as shown from the opening scene. While our eyes are instantly drawn to her distinctive facial appearance which is ungainly to say the least, we soon come to learn that she has a special ability to smell shame or guilt from others, and we see how that ability of hers helps her a lot at her workplace. Keenly watching people passing by her and her colleague, she stops anyone smelling suspicious to her, and her instinct always turns out to be right.

She lives in a small residence located in the middle of a forest outside the city, and there is not anyone around her except her dog trainer roommate Roland (Jörgen Thorsson) and a young couple living near her residence. Roland is not particularly close to Tina, and his dogs are usually hostile to her for some unknown reason, but she has tolerated him anyway because, well, she does not want to be alone and lonely.

And then there comes a sudden change on one day. While she works as usual, she encounters a man who looks as ugly as her, and she smells something odd from that guy even though he does not have anything particularly illegal. When she encounters him again, she has him thoroughly searched, but, again, she does not find anything particularly criminal from him, and we get a wryly amusing moment involved with his certain abnormal body part.

border05

While quite baffled about this strange guy, Tina finds herself somehow attracted a lot to him. She later goes to a hostel where he is currently staying, and she and the guy, named Vore (Eero Milonoff), come to feel more of the mutual feeling between them. She subsequently allows him to stay at a guest house next to her residence, and his frequent presence around her makes her more aware of something gradually awakening inside her.

I will not go into details on what she will discover in the end, but I can tell you that director/co-adaptor Ali Abbasi, who adapted John Ajvide Lindqvist’s short story of the same name with Lindqvist and Isabella Eklöf, did a good job of maintaining the level of interest and curiosity. As effectively establishing the moody atmosphere on the screen, cinematographer Nadim Carlsen constantly suggests dark secrets to be revealed sooner or later, and that aspect is further accentuated by the nervous ambient score by Christoffer Berg and Martin Derkov.

And we get a series of peculiar moments as observing the disturbing aspects of the developing relationship between Tina and Vore. There is a bizarre nocturnal scene showing another strange side of Vore, and then there later comes a freakish scene as he and Tina hurl themselves into their carnal urge. Considering his, uh, exceptional physical condition, copulation looks impossible for them at first, but then there come an outrageous moment you have to see you for yourself, and that is certainly one of the most memorable moments in the film.

As spending more time with Vore, Tina becomes more confident about herself, and she comes to consider seriously about living with him, but she also sees the considerable difference between her and Vore. While Vore does not care much about others different from him and Tina, Tina genuinely cares about others around her despite her miserable longtime status as an outsider, and she is willing to go further when she is asked to participate in the police investigation of a certain heinous criminal case which happened to be detected by her.

border03

While the subplot associated with that police investigation is a bit too contrived, the movie still engages us thanks to the solid performances from its two main performers. While covered with heavy facial makeup, Eva Melander is believably awkward and introverted, and she is particularly good when Tina finally lets out what has been suppressed inside for many years. Looking as ungainly as required just like his co-star, Eero Milonoff also gives an engaging performance to watch, and he and Melander are convincing in the dynamic interactions between their characters.

In contrast, the other main performers in the film are stuck in their under-developed supporting characters, but they did as much as they could do with their thankless roles. While Jörgen Thorsson mostly functions well as a sort of comic relief, Sten Ljunggren gives a fine supporting performance as Tina’s aging father, and he has his own good moment around the ending of the film.

Overall, “Border”, which was the Swedish entry for the Best Foreign Language Film Oscar at the 2019 Academy Awards but nominated for Best Makeup Oscar instead, is not entirely without flaws, and I am not that satisfied with its rather weak ending, but I recommend it anyway for its good atmosphere and commendable performances. While I still think it could explore its subjects more effectively, I admire what is achieved by Abbasi and his cast and crew at least, and, considering that this is his second feature film, it will be interesting to see what will come next from him.

border02

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

The Breaker Upperers (2018) ☆☆☆(3/4): A couple of break-up professionals

thebreakerupperers02.jpg

New Zealand comedy film “The Breaker Upperers”, which was recently released on Netflix, cheerfully bounces along with its two female main characters as generating many quirky and funny moments during its short running time (90 minutes). Although it drags a bit during its last act, the movie still has enough comic momentum to hold our attention, and, above all, it is supported well by the undeniable comic chemistry between its two lead performers.

Madeleine Sami and Jackie van Beek, who are also the directors/writers of the film, are Mel and Jennifer, two longtime friends/business partners who have run a special agency for people in the need of breaking up with their significant others. For helping their clients, they have used rather unorthodox means as shown from an amusing montage sequence, and their latest case is helping a guy fake his death and then get away from his wife. While disguising themselves as police officers, they come to his house for notifying his wife of his ‘death’, and we get the first hilarious moment in the film as they try to look condolent in front of her but cannot help but throw some zingers at each other.

We later get to know about how Mel and Jennifer happened to get involved with each other some years ago. Jennifer had a boyfriend named Joe (Cohen Holloway), but this guy was actually a philanderer who had slept with many other women, and one of them was none other than Mel. Since they met each other due to Joe’s infidelity, Mel and Jennifer have worked closely together as becoming each other’s best friend, and it looks like their friendship is the only meaningful thing in their life.

thebreakerupperers01

However, things get complicated when a new client comes to their agency. He is a 17-year-old rugby player named Jordan (James Rolleston), and he wants to break up with his current girlfriend Sepa (Ana Scotney), but he is afraid of telling that to Sepa because of her rather aggressive attitude. His situation looks like a very easy case, but then he becomes attracted to Mel as talking more with her, and Mel does not reject his approach at all even though Jennifer reminds her that she must not be emotionally involved with her client.

Meanwhile, it turns out that Jennifer has her own emotional issue to deal with. While not so satisfied with her current boyfriend, she feels more constipated and discontent than before, and then, by coincidence, she comes to learn that Joe recently returned for settling along with his wife and kids. As she watches him from the distance at one point, it is clear to us that she still has some unresolved feelings toward him, and we are not surprised when she eventually confronts him later in the story.

As Jennifer and Mel’s relationship becomes more strained than before, the movie diligently serves us a number of nice comic moments to be savored, and there is a humorous scene showing their accidental encounter with Anna (Celia Pacquola), the wife of that aforementioned client of theirs. While not telling anything about who they actually are, Jennifer and Mel come to have a pretty wild evening along with Anna, and their fun time eventually culminates to an uproarious moment accompanied with a certain song by Celin Dion.

After that, Mel understandably feels guilty about what she and Jennifer have done for years, and that naturally makes her conflict with Jennifer. In addition, she goes further along with Jordan shortly after he managed to break up with Sepa, and she subsequently finds herself in a circumstance where she has to be more serious than before.

thebreakerupperers04

Although some of its comic energy is dissipated during its second half, the movie maintains its lightweight mood mostly well, and Sami and Van Beek’s screenplay keeps tickling and amusing us. I was especially amused by the scene set in a police station where Jennifer and Mel must maintain their disguise in front of Anna, and I also appreciated the good comic timing during an absurd scene involved with a surprise birthday party.

Above all, it is always fun to watch the farcical interactions between Sami and Van Beek, and they ably fill their respective roles with lots of humor and personality. Although I am not familiar with either of them (I only saw them playing supporting characters in Jemaine Clement and Taika Waititi’s vampire comedy film “What We Do in the Shadows” (2014), by the way), the movie showed me that they are talented comedy performers to watch, and I hope we will watch more of their comic talent in the future.

Sami and Van Beek also assemble a bunch of colorful cast members around them. While James Rolleston is endearing as a hopelessly sweet and naïve lad, Ana Scotney steals the show as a feisty young woman who will not easily give up her man, and Celia Pacquola, Cohen Holloway, and Rima Te Wiata are solid in their small respective supporting roles.

Although it becomes a little too predictable around its finale, “The Break Upperers” did its job as well as intended while generating enough entertainment for us, and I had a fairly good time with its offbeat comic spirit. In short, this is one of more enjoyable movies from Netflix, and I willingly recommend it if you want something funny and different.

thebreakerupperers03

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment