West of Memphis (2012) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): Their long way to the justice they deserve

small_westofmemphis07What is told in the documentary “West of Memphis” is still outrageous and infuriating to watch although I have already heard and known a lot about one evil crime which shocked the whole town, three suspects who were wrongfully accused and then mistreated by the legal system eager to close the case as soon as possible, and a very long, long way these suspects and their supporters had to take until they saw the light at the end of the tunnel.

In the evening of May 5th, 1993, the missing of three 8-year-old boys, Steve Branch, Michael Moore, and Christopher Byers, was reported to the local police in West Memphis, Arkansas by one of their parents. On the next day, their dead bodies were found in a ditch in their neighbourhood during the police search, and their parents and the other town people were shocked by this horrible crime. They were brutally murdered with the alarming traces of mutilations on their bodies, and the police wondered whether this case was involved with some sort of Satanic ritual.

And then they found their suspects, who were quickly arrested and interrogated. They were Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin, and Jesse Misskelly Jr., and they were teenager boys who had some bad reputation in the town as local juvenile delinquents. The cops extracted the confession from Misskelly, and all three suspects were soon tried and convicted of the murders which many people strongly believed they committed. Echols was sentenced to death, and Baldwin and Misskelly was sentenced to life sentence, and everyone in the town was relieved with the sense of closure.

small_westofmemphis06However, as the time went by, it became apparent that these boys were wrongfully accused of the murders they did not commit, and Joe Berlinger and Bruce Sinofsky’s documentaries “Paradise Lost: The Child Murders at Robin Hood Hill”(1996), “Paradise Lost 2: Revelations”(2000), and “Paradise Lost 3: Purgatory”(2011) showed how the legal authorities incompetently and unfairly handled the case and their suspects during the investigation and the trial. The crime scene was not preserved well although they managed to get several crucial evidences including a hair not belonging to the victims or the suspects, and the statements from Misskelly, which were virtually only direct evidence presented by the prosecution, were filled with inconsistency and errors. As a matter of fact, Misskelly was a dim-witted boy with borderline mental retardation(he was just a little smarter than Forrest Gump, by the way), and he was interrogated by the cops all day long before he gave them his ‘confession’.

The movie keeps mounting lots of things to show us how unfair the trial was. Even before the trial began, these boys were already labelled as the horrible devil-worshipping criminals by the media and the prosecution. Although Misskelly had a strong alibi(he was around 40 miles away from the crime scene during that evening) and Echols also had a credible alibi, the prosecution kept emphasizing the graphic details of the murder case in front of the jury, and they even brought in very unreliable witnesses who were later revealed to be forced or coerced to testify against the defendants. Furthermore, it was strongly suspected that some major evidence presented by the prosecution was not involved with the case at all.

Anyway, the jury accepted the prosecutor’s shaky argument in the end amidst the furor caused by this case, and they found all the defendants were guilty as charged. However, thanks to the critical success of “Paradise Lost”, many people came to pay attention to these wrongfully accused boys, nicknamed West Memphis Three around that time, and the boys came to have lots of prominent supporters including Eddie Vedder, Johnny Depp, Dixie Chicks, and Peter Jackson and Fran Walsh, who had given lots of help and support to West Memphis Three after learning about the case several years ago and then produced this documentary with the director Amy Berg.

small_westofmemphis05The documentary adds more details and information to the long, frustrating process which was previously depicted in “Paradise Lost 2” and “Paradise Lost 3”. The lawyers and investigators and experts hired by the supporters looked closely on the case, and more revealing things were found as a result. For example, several independent forensic experts concluded that the ‘mutilations’ on the bodies were caused by post-mortem animal predation rather than a knife which was presented as one of the major evidences at the court. That could change the whole perspective on the case, but West Memphis Three continued to be imprisoned even while it became very possible that they were innocent.

As the documentary makes a compelling crime story through juggling the interviews from many various people associated with the case and the following trial, it gives us a big, clear picture of the legal injustice inflicted on West Memphis Three while also presenting us several suspicious things about one very possible suspect. Did this suspect really commit the crime? The documentary does not answer that question while trying to be objective to its target, but we cannot help but be suspicious of this seemingly normal-looking suspect as we look at many questionable aspects.

“West of Memphis” is an absorbing documentary which works as a powerful summary of 18 years of the unfair ordeal and the long fight against it. Finally, as shown in its final scenes, West Memphis Three became free in 2011 through a special deal with the prosecution, but they are still technically guilty because of Alford Plea, a rather oxymoronic legal measure which allowed them to assert their innocence while accepting the plea bargain between their lawyers and the state prosecution. This can be regarded as a half-victory, but everyone supporting them was very glad to see that the justice they had demanded for many years was eventually done in the end.

This is a happy ending indeed, but one nagging question still remains at the end of the documentary: who killed these poor innocent children? – and what exactly happened during that dreadful evening of May 1993? Sadly, it is quite possible that the case will remain in mystery forever, and it is really creepy to imagine that one heinous child murderer is walking freely around somewhere at present without getting caught for what he did.

small_westofmemphis02

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Mud (2012) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4) : The water is wide

small_mud05The water is wide. That sentence was floated around my mind while I was watching the Mississippi river and the surrounding landscapes in Jeff Nichols’ latest film “Mud”. It looks plain and mundane at first, but the movie has a vivid sense of specific locations along with the natural beauty inside them, and we are naturally drawn to its rich coming-of-age drama wide enough to encompass many story elements flowed into it.

The story is mainly told through the eyes of two young boys at the beginning of their adolescent years. Ellis(Tye Sheridan) and Neckbone(Jacob Lofland) have their special place outside their river town in Arkansas, and it is a small unnamed island in the middle of the river. We see Ellis sneaking out of his boathouse home without being noticed by his parents early in the morning, and then he and Neckbone go to their island by their motorboat for having their own free time for a while.

In the island forest, they find a big abandoned boat stuck in the middle of a tree, which was probably swept to that spot due to a big flood. They decide to have that boat for themselves, but they realize there is someone in the island besides them, who must have been living in that boat for several days. They soon meet the guy in the question on the beach when they are about to get back to their town, and that is how Mud(Matthew McConaughey) and the boys encounter each other for the first time.

IMG_7996.CR2Mud, a shabby young fugitive who needs some help from others for his personal plan, asks the boys to deliver him some food, and then he also asks them to do the other things beside that as the boys come to spend more time with him in the island. Although the boys instantly discern that there is something suspicious about Mud, he is one of those charming guys who can easily persuade others to do something for them, and he offers a tempting deal to the boys; if they help him repair the boat for his plan, he will give them his gun. Despite their initial suspicion on Mud, Ellis decides to help him, and Neckbone willingly follows his best friend’s decision.

As they help Mud without telling anyone, the boys come to know more about Mud and his plan. He is determined to reunite with his girl Juniper(Reese Witherspoon) and then get away with her, and, as a teenager boy who begins to sense the estranged relationship between his parents(Ray McKinnon and Sarah Paulson) and becomes more aware of the girls in his town, Ellis comes to believe Mud’s sincere feeling toward Juniper. Not so surprisingly, Mud becomes not only his friend but also his romantic idol with a little mythic quality(their first encounter scene is imbued with a bit of mysterious feeling – how can Mud suddenly appear behind them out of nowhere?), and that is not changed much even when Ellis comes to know later that Mud is a wanted man being chased after by the police and others for a crime he unwisely committed because of his love.

However, as it happened in many other memorable coming-of-age dramas, an innocent heart is bound to be broken in one way or the other in the end as one step toward adulthood, and Ellis’ story is no exception. Handling his story with quiet humor and understated sensitivity, the director/writer Jeff Nichols gives us the acute moments of adolescent heartbreak and disillusionment. Ellis falls in love with one of older high school girls and she seems to accept his rather rough courtship, but he later painfully realizes his misguided notion of their relationship. The relationship between his parents is far more deteriorated than he thought, and he may have to accept the resulting inevitable change sooner or later. In addition, as the situation becomes more serious and dangerous than before, the past between Mud and Juniper turns out to be not as romantic as Ellis wanted to believe.

small_mud01The movie rolls its main plot and other subplots together effortlessly without losing balance in its leisurely pace, and the result is a rich mixture of bittersweet coming-of-age tale, tarnished love story, and intimate character drama. It is further enhanced by its realistic atmosphere, and the cinematographer Adam Stone, who previously collaborated with Nichols in his first two films, gives us several wide and beautiful sights of the Mississippi river and the nearby plains while vividly capturing the local atmosphere of Arkansas. The river looked like a big lake to me at times, and I was especially impressed by a brief twilight shot on the beach which nearly approaches to the ambiance of black and white film.

Nichols also draws the excellent performances from his cast. As I said before several times in my previous reviews, Matthew McConaughey has been recently getting the good roles he is born to play after long years of being wasted in disposable films, and he gives a terrific performance again here in this film(As a matter of fact, Nichols already decided to cast McConaughey for the film when he wrote his screenplay). Mud turns out to be unreliable as suspected, but he is still a likable guy thanks to McConaughey’s electrifying performance, and the movie does not let Mud be turned into a simple case of fallen idol even when Ellis becomes angry and disillusioned after learning some important facts about Mud through Juniper and Mr. Blankenship(Sam Shepard), Ellis’ close neighbour who has known Mud since Mud was young and whose close relationship with Mud in the past might have been not that different from the growing relationship between Mud and Ellis at present.

small_mud06Two young actors Tye Sheridan and Jacob Lofland hold the center of the story with their unadorned performances, and they are supported well by the adult performers surrounding them. Ray McKinnon, Sarah Paulson, Sam Shepard, and Michael Shannon are absolutely convincing as the people who have been living in their town for years, and Reese Witherspoon, whose career has been rather lukewarm recently since her Oscar win, finally gets a chance to fully utilize her talent as a weary woman as messy and flawed as the man she loves; the wordless moment between her character and Mud is understated but effective none the less, and the same thing can be said about the last scene of the movie, which says a little on the surface but tells a lot to us through its mood and performances.  The movie also gives some human aspects to its bad buys in the story, and, as a vengeful old man with the personal score to settle with Mud, Joe Don Baker subtly suggests in his brief scenes that he may be not as evil as Mud describes to the boys despite what he is going to do for punishing Mud.

Jeff Nichols made a stunning debut with “Shotgun Stories”(2007), a somber but tense family drama with a touch of classic tragedy, and then he gave us “Take Shelter”(2011), an equally intense story about a man getting disturbed by his ominous dreams. Both films drew our attention to their universal human stories through the distinctive and specific backgrounds, and “Mud” is no exception. With the rural mood evocative of Mark Twain’s “The Adventures of Tom Sawyer” and “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn”, it leads us to a familiar but touching coming-of-age drama about friendship, love, loyalty, redemption, and maturation, and we can clearly sense the changes inside its characters in the end. It hurts to grow up, but it is always better to grow up as our life flows with us.

small_mud04

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Passion (2012) ☆☆☆(3/4) : A kinky thriller from Brian De Palma(you guess it)

small_passion01“Passion” is the latest kinky thriller from Brian De Palma, the first-class master of trashy guilty pleasure. He is back in his sensational territory again with his usual bag of tricks, and the result is as much as what we can expect from the director who dazzled us with styles and techniques in his wild erotic thrillers such as “Dressed to Kill”(1980) and “Body Double”(1984). Although its story gets more implausible as it approaches to the finale, the movie is made by the director having a fun amid many illogical aspects of the story, and you cannot help but be tickled by this entertaining process especially if you are familiar with his previous works.

The movie is the remake of French thriller film “Love Crime”(2010), and the synopsis of its first half is almost identical to that of the original version except several notable changes in the story background. Isabelle(Noomi Rapace), a quiet young woman working in some big advertisement company in Berlin, has been an assistant to Christine(Rachel McAdams), who has been a major source of frustration at Isabelle’s work and life for many reasons despite their rather smooth professional relationship. It is apparent that Christine has exploited her talent for years, but, despite her own assistant’s caring advice, Isabelle is hesitant about stepping forward even though she knows well that her career is going nowhere under Christine.

Besides that, Christine is good at controlling Isabelle’s feelings as much as she is deft at manipulating the others around her including Dirk(Paul Anderson), one of the executives in the company who is also Christine’s current bedfellow. Christine becomes a little more personal with Isabelle during their private conversation, and, in contrast to the cool, detached attitude of the original version, the movie gleefully focuses on the sexual aspect of the interactions between them. In fact, it shows us more about Christine’s perverted side behind her icy, impeccable appearance, so we are treated with a brief scene where Christine is having a kinky sex with her masked partner while being blindfolded on her bed.

small_passion03When Isabelle finally does something for herself after finding that her brilliant idea about one advertisement can be ruined, she gets the compliments she deserves for her bold move and a huge success resulted from it, but she also receives the cold ire from Christine because it becomes quite possible that Isabelle will be promoted to the position in US instead of her boss. Christine switches to the full queen bee mode for hurting Isabelle by any means necessary, and Rachel McAdams, who has never been so mean like this since her memorably vicious high school character in “Mean Girls”(2004), is utterly nefarious as a cruel and cunning woman who knows a lot about how to whip her underlings and enjoys every minute of it.

On the opposite, Noomi Rapace gives an equally solid performance as Isabelle being dominated and humiliated by her horrible boss during the first half of the story and then thrown into a more difficult situation during the second half. If you have watched the original version, you surely know what will eventually happen around the middle of the story, but De Palma’s screenplay adapted from Alain Corneau and Natalie Carter begins to toy with the original plot around that point. You can be never be sure about what will happen in the end, and the mood becomes nightmarish while the characters and their bright places are engulfed by the shady atmosphere as if someone suddenly ordered that the blinds should be pulled down on every window in the movie.

And then the movie plunges itself into the array of the visual moments reminiscent of Brian De Palma’s well-known thriller films. While a certain method of shock and surprise from “Raising Caine”(1992) is frequently used, we also get a suspenseful split-screen sequence accompanied with a classic ballet performance in the theater, and this naturally takes us back to the memories of “Sisters”(1973) and “Dressed to Kill”.

small_passion04With his crew including the cinematographer José Luis Alcaine, a frequent collaborator of Pedro Almodóvar, and the composer Pino Donaggio, who composed a bunch of impressive scores for De Palma’s works during the 1970-80s(their last collaboration was “Raising Caine”, by the way), Brian DePalma continues to hold our attention with terrific cinematic moments even when many things do not make sense a lot in the story. Unlike the original version, the movie does not wrap its story with a neat ending, but it instead makes a stylish exit with bravado as shown in its overblown finale which is involved with several things including a certain cellular phone, a dizzy staircase, a bloody scarf, and some mysterious blonde female character.

While watching all of these elements in the movie, I found myself being nostalgic about my adolescent experience with De Palma’s works mentioned above. Not long after being exposed to Alfred Hitchcock’s films, I encountered “Carrie”(1976) and “Dressed to Kill” in 1996, and then I quickly became fascinated with De Palma’s many other works. Sometimes it looked like he virtually made the R-rated versions of Hitchcock films, but he created his own lurid voyeuristic area under Hitchcock’s influence as a master filmmaker, and, as shown in his underrated work “Femme Fatale”(2002), he is usually at his peak when his movie is wild, dirty, violent, and playful with sensational/sleazy materials ready to be exposed in front of his camera.

Although it is less satisfying than the original version in case of the story, “Passion” compensates for its flaws with its wild style and good performances. McAdams and Rapace are good if not better than Kristin Scott-Thomas and Ludivine Sagnier, and I liked its extra touch on Isabelle’s assistant played by Karoline Herfurth. The movie proves to us that Brian De Palma is still the same dirty old director who seduced us and then played us like piano in “Femme Fatale”, and, considering his never-ending perversity and obsession clearly reflected in this enjoyable trashy thriller, I sincerely hope he will soon make another guilty pleasure to be enjoyed and appreciated. It may be too dirty and violent for your taste, but, seriously, we need that kind of colorfully distinct fun in these days.

small_passion05

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Love Crime (2010) ☆☆☆(3/4) : Her horrible boss

small_lovecrime01I initially thought I should not tell you about a crucial turning point in the plot of French thriller film “Love Crime”, but, on the second thought, it does not matter much. Although it begins with one thing and then moves to the other thing, you can quickly predict something is going to happen sooner or later as watching its two conflicting main characters, and the movie does not even try to hide that from us while calmly watching how its plot is rolled to its predictable but inevitable finale with the sense of a cold, vicious fun.

The center of its morbid fun is Christine(Kristin Scott Thomas), an executive of some international corporation who will be your worst nightmare if you happen to work under her. She may look nice and generous on the surface when we see her working on their latest assignment with her assistant Isabelle(Ludivine Sagnier) during one late night at Christine’s big mansion, but we also sense the cold heartlessness beneath her gestures even when she treats Isabelle like her team member.

In case of Isabelle, a shy, introverted young woman with lots of potential who has somehow risen in the cutthroat world of corporation business, she does not feel bad about her professional relationship with her boss. Still not feeling confident or sure about herself despite her considerable career advance, she is always in the need of being appreciated and loved, and Christine has been exploiting it for her own advantage. She talks to Isabelle like her best friend and her generous mentor, and, out of loyalty and love, Isabelle willingly serves her boss at any time. As a matter of fact, she is so considerate that she virtually gives up her own idea to Christine at one point while making it sure that it will be presented as Christine’s idea.

small_lovecrime05This toxic relationship can go on and on like that, but Isabelle’s dissatisfaction has been growing deep inside her as her own assistant Daniel(Guillaume Marquet) keep suggesting that she should think more about her future and her career. Though it is probably not the first time, Isabelle is pretty pissed when Christine makes her do all the works and then gets all the compliments later, so she decides to do something behind her back as soon as she sees a golden opportunity she cannot resist. After all, her mentor taught her that she should grab any chance thrown to her, didn’t she?

However, when Christine sees that her ‘protégé’ is becoming a competitor looking toward a higher position Christine is also eager to occupy, she is becoming far meaner than ever. First, she hurts Isabelle deeply on the personal level through a cruel deception, and then she humiliates Isabelle openly on the public level in front of other executives during the company party. While it is now certain that she will get that position as she wanted, Christine even goes further; she is determined to make Isabelle into her lifelong slave, so she blackmails Isabelle into accepting their changed circumstance.

Isabelle seems to be conforming to her boss’ sadistic demand, but it is slowly revealed that something is prepared in her mind as we see her doing several seemingly inconsequential things, and the people at the company including Daniel look at her with some concern as she looks increasingly neurotic and unstable while popping pills into her mouth. They are not surprised about that, for they are well aware of how mentally grueling it is to work under the boss from hell like Christine(According to one of them, Isabelle’s predecessor is currently in a mental hospital after suffering a mental breakdown).

And then something finally happens as we expected, and the movie moves to a different mode. I do not dare to talk about that in details, but let’s say the director/co-screenplay writer Alain Corneau, who died not long after the movie was released in France, made a competent thriller which can hold our interest even when we can clearly see where it will arrive at. Isabelle is suddenly hurled into a very difficult situation while there seems to be nothing to save her, and the main pleasure during the second half of the movie is how that circumstance is gradually reversed as she is surrounded by the mounting evidences against her alleged crime.

small_lovecrime03The movie depends a lot on the performances of two lead actresses, who did a fabulous job in their respective roles. Ludivine Sagnier is good as a passive woman destined to be pushed by others around her; her detached face convincingly hides what has been accumulated for years behind it, and her neutral performance also works effectively when her character is facing a grave possibility which will affect not only her carrier but also her life.

Horrible bosses in the movies have usually been plum roles to talented performers, and Kristin Scott Thomas delivers a compellingly diabolical performance with understated malicious humor; Christine is a mean cold witch who will get what she wants by any means necessary, and it is almost a guilty pleasure to watch her dominating over Isabelle and other executives in the company including Phillipe(Patrick Mille), a good-looking dude who unwisely lets himself be stuck between two women he sleeps with when he has something to hide from others.

I hope I did not tell you too much about how everything in the plot will be eventually played out in the end. Many things in the movie are pretty predictable(I could easily guess that a certain supporting character would be a crucial factor in the story later as soon as that character appeared), but its pleasure lies in how they are executed, and I enjoyed the virulent dynamic between Sagnier and Thomas on the screen. The ending and the plan involved with it may be a little too neat to plausible, but this is a neat thriller with slick atmosphere from the start, and I guess that comes with the territory.

small_lovecrime02

Posted in Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Paperboy (2012) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4) : A swampy coming of age story with Southern flavor

small_thepaperboy02Once I discerned that the plot was not very important in Lee Daniels’ lurid Southern melodrama “The Paperboy”, I just observed its nice languid mood decorating its dark, pulpy melodramatic tale. Everything in the movie looks hot and sweaty, and it is rather amusing as it goes further into its swampy corner with the weirdly lurid sights including the urination as an emergency treatment for being stung by jellyfish.

The notoriety of “The Paperboy” was well known to me and others even before the movie finally arrives here in South Korea in this week. When the movie was shown at the Cannes Film Festival in the last year, the movie was lambasted by many critics and the reporters after its first screening, and then we all heard about its infamous urination scene featuring its two lead performers. The movie is surely as trashy as that scene, but that is exactly what it intends to be in its gaudy world, and it fairly succeeds in case of presenting the vivid summer atmosphere of Southern area and its colorfully morbid characters despite its ultimate fizzle in the end.

Its story is told from the distance by Anita(Macy Gray), a black maid who saw everything, knew everything, and now tells everything to an unseen reporter after a book based on what happened during that hot summer of Mort Country, Florida in 1969 is published. At that time, she worked as a housemaid for W.W. Jansen(Scott Glenn), the owner of the local newspaper, and she was particularly close to one of Jansen’s two sons, Jack(Zac Efron). Jack once attended the state college as a swimmer, but he was expelled due to his misdemeanor, and now he has been mainly working as a paperboy for his father’s newspaper company. When he is not working, he just idles away his time with no particular plan, and his father, who is mostly occupied with his new girlfriend, does not care much about his son’s future.

small_thepaperboy01Meanwhile, Jack’s older brother Ward(Matthew McConaughey), who has been leading his own journalistic career outside their town, returns to Mort Country with his associate/friend Yardley Acheman(David Oyelowo), a British black guy not so enthusiastic about coming to Ward’s hometown for their business. They come here for investigating and reporting on a murder case which happened several years ago after they received the letter from one of the local residents, and they think this case might be a good material for their newspaper article and, possibly, the book which can help their respective careers.

The woman who sent the letters to them is Charlotte Bless(Nichole Kidman), who is your typical trashy Southern bimbo right from her first appearance. This shallow woman is one of those women attracted to death-low convicts for their own kinky reasons, and her target of affection is Hillary Van Wetter(John Cusack), who will sit on electric chair within years for murdering a local town sheriff. He may be guilty as charged, but he can be pardoned at least, and that is what Charlotte hopes for as a woman who has already married him.

As working for Ward and Yardley as their driver, Jack meets Hillary with them at the prison, and he is a repulsive and twisted man to say the least. In one of the most sordid moments in the film, he demands something inappropriate to Charlotte, and, while not touching him at all, she willingly surrender herself to his dirty demand right in front of the others who watch this perverted sight with the equal amount of amusement and disgust.

While their investigation getting nowhere despite some questionable details in the murder case Ward and Yardley found, Jack finds himself obsessed with Charlotte like an adolescent boy having a crush on older woman. It seems that she also likes him even though she seems to be serious about her flirting commitment to Hillary, and that is how we get that aforementioned moment when Charlotte promptly urinates on Jack’s body after he is heavily stung by jellyfish during his swimming on the town beach. “If anyone’s gonna piss on him, it’s going to be me! He don’t like strangers peeing on him!”, she angrily shouts when other young ladies try to urinate on Jack.

thepaperboy06The director Lee Daniels, who wrote the screenplay with his co-writer Peter Dexter based on Dexter’s book, drench his story in the ambiance of hot summer days and nights of Florida, and the movie spends lots of its running time on making its atmosphere palpably sultry on the screen. At one point, You can vividly feel how hard it is for the characters to go through the swamp area near the town to meet someone they need to talk with, and then the movie cordially greets you with a graphic scene of disemboweling an alligator.

Some of them are wasted in their roles, but the actors handle their pulpy caricatures well. While Zac Efron mostly feels like a deer caught in the swamp as the least colorful character, Matthew McConaughey is suitably cast as a charming Southern man struggling with his personal demon generated from self-hate. John Cusack is effective as a sleazy and loony swamp animal, and Nicole Kidman does not hesitate to look blatantly slutty in her good performance.

With such tasteless materials, the movie is ready to plunge into its sensationalism, but it ultimately fails during its problematic third act where the story takes a left turn and then reaches to the violent finale too abruptly with a little impact. I cannot wholly recommend the movie due to that flaw and other problems, but it gets hotter in these days, so it may be an ideal guilty pleasure for you to be enjoyed with a glass of mojito.

thepaperboy03

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Europa Report (2013) ☆☆☆(3/4) : A Hard SF recorded on Found footage

small_europareport02

When I heard about “Europa Report” at first, it looked like one of those ‘found footage’ horror films, and it really is. The movie mainly revolves around the video clips from a doomed space mission(this is not a spoiler at all, by the way), and you can easily guess that the main characters in the spaceship will be dead one by one as their situation gets worse and worse. And then there will be none, and that is the end of their story.

But don’t worry, folks, because the movie is a thoughtful hard SF movie which happens to wear a horror genre and I was entertained and intrigued by its interesting goodies. While making a good SF story with a touch of horror, the people behind the movie really cared and thought about how a manned space mission beyond the moon will look like and what its members will see and experience during their risky mission, and that is the main reason why several terrifying moments in the movie come to us as the effective moments of horror supported by its considerable realism.

You probably remembered that the scientists reported the existence of water below the thick ice plate of Europa, Jupiter’s fourth largest moon, in November 2011, and the movie was inspired by that real-life science news. Because the existence of water implies the possibility of life-forming environment, a special space mission was eventually initiated in the future not so far from the present, and then six astronauts embarked on their long journey to Europa with their big spaceship aptly named Europa One.

small_europareport01The movie tells their doomed journey in non-chronological order. We see that something unfortunate happened after 16 months, and then we are told that everyone on the Earth, including Dr. Samantha Unger(Embeth Davidtz) who was the supervisor of this mission, was upset and perplexed when the constant communication with the spaceship was suddenly disconnected around that point. Everything looked all right from the preparation step to the launch, and the mood in the spaceship was optimistic even when they were quite farther from the Earth than any other astronauts in the history, but then they were gone forever.

The movie is presented as a sort of special documentary produced after the video clips from Europa One were finally transmitted to the Earth to reveal what happened to the astronauts after that disconnection incident. While looking around the spaceship and the daily routine of the astronauts through many digital video recording equipments placed inside and outside the spaceship, we get some background scientific knowledge from Dr. Unger and other two scientists played by Dan Fogler and Isiah Whitlock Jr. Fogler, who has been usually cast as comic characters, is as serious and convincing as any passionate scientist should be when he explains the geographical details of Europa to us, and some of you will probably appreciate how much the movie is based on the scientific facts through lots of consults with several technical advisors during the pre-production period.

We also get to know about our ill-fated astronauts as observing their daily life in the spaceship, and the movie wisely presents them as the resourceful professionals trained and prepared for their long, difficult mission full of unforeseen possibilities. Even when they are devastated by a terrible incident and further depressed by the fact they are virtually alone due to the broken communication with their mission control center, they decide to continue their mission, and none of them loses their control at all even when their situation looks pretty hopeless to them as well as us. They are indeed afraid, but they try their best as trained professionals, and we come to care about them even though we already know what will happen in the end.

small_europareport07Like the movie itself, the characterization is finely tuned to the realistic level, and the cast gives solid performances. David Wu and Anamaria Marinca are the pilots of the spaceship, Michael Nyqvist and Sharlto Copley are two engineers taking care of the spaceship, and Christian Camargo and Karolina Wydra are the scientists ready to find anything interesting in Europa. The cinematographer Enrique Chediak does an excellent job of presenting the characters and their drama in the limited spaces, and the movie seldom feels stiff or stuffy even though we are well of aware of their confined state.

While establishing the solid ground for the story written by Philip Gelatt, the director Sebastián Cordero gives us some time to appreciate the wonderful sights in his film. With the help of Oscar-winning production designer Eugenio Caballero, Europa One feels as real as NASA space shuttle, and the landscapes of Europa are presented with realistic wonder as the astronauts explore their alien environment day by day. There may be some danger lurking somewhere in the planet, but they are curious about what valuable knowledge they can get none the less, and they are willing to take one small step forward into the unknown to learn more about the universe – and ourselves, perhaps.

Not long after an enchanting visual moment when a robot equipped with camera is sent below the ice plate of Europa, it becomes increasingly possible that there is something dangerous, and the situation become far more tense for the characters as their chance of returning safely to the Earth is decreasing. What will be revealed around the finale will be not that surprising to you, but the movie thankfully does not overplay it during its somber ending which asks us about the value of the knowledge and its cost we have to pay sometimes while reaching for it.

“Europa Report” is a small SF film based on one interesting idea, and it accomplishes as much as intended with its small budget. I am getting tired of found footage movies in these days, but sometimes we get good ones with more creativity, and this movie is one of them. I enjoyed its realistic details, and I was again reminded of one frightening thing I once observed from my favorite film “2001: A Space Odyssey”(1968); it is really horrifying to be floated alone helplessly in the middle of the space, you know.

small_europareport03

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Drug War (2012) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4) : A treacherous game amidst cops and criminals

small_drugwar02Good thrillers grip my attention at some point around the beginning and never let it go until the end credit. In case of Johnnie To’s crime noir thriller “Drug War”, it was one of its early scenes. A cop chases after a criminal right after coming across him, and the criminal immediately runs down to the basement floor. The cop follows him alone, and we sort of expect something unpleasant to happen because we saw what the criminal acquired before their encounter.

Sensing that the criminal is hiding somewhere on the basement floor, the cop looks around for a moment, but he is too smart to search for the criminal alone. While taking no chance, he summons his men, and he and others soon surround the criminal’s unlikely hiding spot, and the criminal clearly discerns that it is wise to surrender himself to the police for his survival – for now, at least.

With the smart characters like them as its main pieces, “Drug War” unfolds a treacherous game amidst the cops and criminals who are actually not that different from each other while conflicting with each other over a thin boundary separating them. To them, betrayal is a usual weapon for defeating opponents, and alliance always feels temporary and uneasy because anything can happen. Once it finishes building up the tension as we get its big picture of how its characters are placed in each own place in the plot, the movie goes for overkill during its third act, and the devastating finale comes with a bitter nihilistic laugh reminiscent of Jean-Pierre Melville’s crime noir films.

The criminal mentioned above is Choi Tin-ming(Louis Koo), who happens to have a very unlucky day when he attracts the attention of Captain Zhang Lei(Sun Hong-Lei). The Captain has just arrested a bunch of drug mules along with their handler, and, when he and other cops take them to the hospital for extracting the packages of drug from their colons through enema(ugh, I hate it when that happens), the Captain encounters unconscious Tin-ming on one of the hospital beds. He has been brought to the hospital as an emergency patient after losing consciousness during his frantic driving, and the Captain quickly finds out what happened to him when he discovers Tin-ming’s operation site.

drugwar06After being arrested and taken to the police station, Tin-ming knows he is in a really big trouble. Because he is a middle-boss of the drug organization who is clearly connected with a mass of incriminating evidences found by the Captain, it goes without saying that he will get death sentence according to the Chinese criminal law. He is willing to do anything for escaping that fate, and it does not take much time for the Captain to force Tin-ming to corporate with him and betray his criminal associates.

Some of them are his friends or his family members, but that does not seem to matter much to Tin-ming, who willingly cooperates with the Captain during his Mission Impossible-like operation. During a suspenseful scene where the Captain must inhale the drug given to him to maintain his fake identity in front of one of his main targets, Tin-ming manages to help the Captain keep his cover intact and fool the target, and he later helps the Captain more during a very urgent situation involving an emergent ice water bath.

Still, the Captain, who remains pretty expressionless except when expertly assuming a fake blowhard persona for his operation, does not trust Tin-ming a lot. He and other cops are tired and sleepy as they have been doing their work for more than 24 hours, but they are still watchful of this untrustworthy criminal who, as suspected by the Captain, has several useful cards hidden behind his back just in case.

small_drugwar07As the things get more complicated and more violent, we come to feel rather distant from the plot, but the movie has a plenty of black humor and visual style to be mixed with its cold violence. There are also several colorful criminal characters, and two of them are deaf-mute brothers who turn out to be a lot more capable than we thought. Their conversation scene with Tin-ming through sign language is quietly amusing and poignant because the brothers actually care about Tin-ming while never imagining his betrayal. We also have a duo of junkies driving a truck loaded with drug, and, while they are a bit annoying as the comic relief of the story, their hapless behaviors are the constant source of amusement. Is it really hard to get a good truck driver in China nowadays?

The finale, which begins with the secret meeting near an elementary school in the morning, is pretty heartless to say the least with its brutal payoff, but the movie retains its sense of twisted humor even at its most violent moment. We get some laugh when the plot mercilessly strikes its characters with unexpected things, and the final cold twist right before the ending is especially memorable for the ironic poetic justice inside its macabre sight.

I belatedly came to be familiar with the director Johnnie To’s works through some of the recent films produced or directed by him. My first experience with his movie was “Mad Detective”(2007), which he co-directed with Wai Ka-Fai, and then I was quite impressed by many wonderful visual moments of “Vengeance”(2009), where Johnny Hallyday played an aging man hiring a bunch of professional criminals for carrying out his personal vengeance.

Like his previous films, “Drug War” is a slick, taut, efficient crime movie coldly observing the gray characters with its ambiguous but ultimately firm morality. Survival may be priority above anything else in their melancholic criminal world, but there will always be the consequence when the rules and codes are getting broken, and, as shown in its cold, stern last scene, nobody can escape from that once chaos reigns, no matter how much they struggle to the very end.

small_drugwar04

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

A Hijacking (2012) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4) : Hostage negotiation is waiting

small_hijacking03“A Hijacking” presents us a long, exhausting process of hostage negotiation with its plain but tense realism, and it is an absorbing experience. While there is no big action scene or heroic act to excite us, we closely watch the ordinary people struggling and sweating in their difficult and dangerous situation, and their desperation and frustration is palpable on the screen. They become more tired as the time goes by, but they must wait and be careful as dealing with a bunch of violent thugs.

Day 1 of the story opens with the daily routine of the crew members inside one Danish cargo ship sailing on the Indian Ocean. We see Mikkel Hartmann(Pilou Asbæk) having a personal conversation on the phone with his wife and kid, and then we also meet the other crew members including the captain and Mikkel’s friend Jan Sørensen(Roland Møller). Mikkel works as the cook on the ship, and we sense jolly amity between him and others as they are sailing toward Mumbai under the fine weather.

Meanwhile, in Copenhagen, Denmark, the CEO of the shipping company is going through his usual business schedule. After discussing with other company executives on business strategy during their morning meeting, Peter C. Ludvigsen(Søren Malling) goes right to a negotiation meeting with the other company. We can see that this calm middle-aged businessman is good at dealing with others; when he sees that the negotiation is going nowhere, he gets out of the room as if he had nothing to lose from a possible rupture, and the people at the opposition eventually accept his final offer in the end.

Not long after that, an urgent news is reported to Peter while he is working. One of their ships has lost contact with the company, and it seems that the ship is hijacked by Somalian pirates. While their infamy is considerably decreased at present due to more national security/military measures for protecting cargo ships, Somalian pirates had been notorious for many incidents of hijacking and pillage during 2008-2011, and you have probably heard about their hijacking incident from the media at least once.

small_hijacking01The ship is indeed hijacked, and, while they are mostly all right, Mikkel and his shipmates are held as the hostages by the armed Somalian pirates successfully occupying the ship. Their representative Omar (Abdihakin Asgar), who emphasizes that he is not associated with the pirates but is taken to the ship just because he can speak English, contacts with the company, and he delivers the pirates’ demand of $15,000,000 ransom.

As soon as he is reported about the ship, Peter quickly holds an emergency meeting. In such a situation like that, we may imagine of him and others gathering in a fancy briefing room filled with monitors and other high-teach equipments, but the people including a negotiation expert Connor Julian(Gary Skjoldmose Porter) gather in a plain-looking meeting room instead. While one wall is covered with the profiles of each crew member, a big white board on the other wall is used for summarizing the progress in their ransom negotiation.

As an experienced expert, Connor advises Peter not to deal directly with the representative of the pirates because of his possible emotional involvement which may disrupt the process, but Peter has already decided to handle the situation for himself as the CEO of his company. With Connor at his side, he offers a far less ransom($250,000) as advised by Connor, and then he and others slowly proceed to the next steps.

While going back and forth between Denmark and Somalia, the movie usually focuses on only one side rather than intercutting between both sides during the negotiation scenes, and the tension on the screen is slowly increased as Peter and others struggle with this difficult negotiation. The days keep passing by, and they become more frustrated while trying to lower the ransom at any chance, and Omar is equally frustrated while trying not to lower the ransom in any case. Regardless of whether he is really associated with the pirates or not, we later see how much he feels tired and nervous during his scene with Mikkel. He may have an advantage through hostages, but the pirates will not get money if he pushes too far and the negotiation is ruptured as a consequence, and he seems to be afraid of that dire possibility.

small_ahijacking04In case of Mikkel and other hostages, they are desperately waiting for release. Their stuffy predicament may be over at any time, but the time feels far longer than before, and the day they wish for seems to be beyond their reach. At least they come to have some moments of respite while getting a little friendly with Somailan pirates, but that does not change the grim fact that they are hostages and captors. Somalian pirates can be a merry band of thugs for a while if they want, but they are still dangerous guys with guns, and there is an emotionally shattering moment for both Mikkel and Peter when the mood of the negotiation becomes more aggressive than before.

The director/writer Tobias Lindholm actually shot the film in Denmark and Somaila(the actors in Denmark really talked with the actors in Somalia on the phone during the negotiation scenes), and his documentary-like approach to the story works well with the realistic performances from his cast as giving considerable verisimilitude to the story. We get to know more about its main characters as they try their best under their hard circumstance, and the movie also observes the other things around the negotiation process including Peter’s personal life or a surprising moment of brief rapport between captors and hostages.

And the negotiation goes on and on with no particularly breakthrough for both sides. Yes, both sides want to reach to the agreement, but, like any other difficult deals, it always takes days or weeks or months to find the point where both sides can be satisfied, and this is pretty grueling for everyone – especially the helpless hostages who slowly gets numb and broken under their extending harsh condition. It was repeatedly said in John le Carré’s novel “The Russia House” that spying is waiting; I think the same thing can be said about hostage negotiation.

small_ahijacking02

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Snowpiercer (2013) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4) : A dark journey on the New Ice Age Express

small_snowpiercer01I know it is a cliché, but I must say this; “Snowpiercer” is something we do not come across often in the movie theaters nowadays. This is a smart, compelling science fiction film which can intrigue us with its futuristic setting at the beginning and then pull our attention into its thrilling journey packed with interesting sights until it arrives at the powerful finale where we come to care about not only what has happened during the characters’ journey but also what will happen next at their arriving point. You may have recognize lots of inherent holes and flaws in its track, but the movie confidently pushes its premise throughout its running time, and it goes all the way to its inevitable destination as intended from the beginning while deftly dialing our expectation level up and down in its each compartment.

The background of the movie sounds pretty unrealistic to say the least, but it looks fascinating none the less. In 2014, the global climate disruption became far worse than before(it may not be that soon, but that will happen within several years if we keep neglecting the current situation), and the nations around the world jointly attempted to lower the global temperature through spraying a newly developed chemical gas in the atmosphere all over the Earth. The temperature was surely lowered as hoped, but the result was an apocalyptic catastrophe; the Ice Age returned, and the whole world became a frozen snowy hell to almost every organism on the earth.

While the human civilization had fallen and lots of people were frozen to death at that time, there were a group of people fortunate enough to get the chance to survive through the train belonging to an unorthodox billionaire named Wilford(Ed Harris). Right before the Ice Age began, he laid his special railroad line all over the continents(he even put the bridge between Russia and Alaska), and his train has been running on the line all the time thanks to its high-tech engine which has never been stopped since the catastrophe. I do not know how his railroad can be maintained without any serious problem for 17 years of snow and ice, but his train surely looks magnificent as it mightily and rapidly pulls its long, long lines of compartments along its track. Even when it comes across the ice/snow blocks on its way, it just penetrates through them using its sheer power and speed and then goes on and on while completing its world tour every year.

small_snowpiercer08

While Wilford has occupied the engine/head compartment since the people took refuge in his train, his employers have maintained the strict class system within their ark, and the passengers get as much as they paid. The first-class passengers occupy the most luxurious compartments in the front, and the economy class passengers are the next in line, and the free passengers, who can be regarded as the 99% class of the train, are stuck in the tail compartments with little support. It is utterly freezing outside(it takes less than 10 minutes to make a bare arm completely frozen like a rock), and the tail compartment people have no choice but accept their shabby social position within this micro-society which may be the last flame of humanity now.

In such a ghetto-like condition, there is always a chance of rebellion among these people, and it is about to happen again as before. Curtis, played by Chris Evans in his grittiest and grimiest performance, is a young rebellious man determined to try as hard as possible, and he has been looking for a good chance while checking several aspects of his plan. All he and others have to do is moving forward along the compartments and then taking over the engine compartment in the opposite, but it is not an easy job at all because 1) they do not know well about what they will come across beyond their compartments and 2) Wilford and his second-in-command Mason(Tilda Swinton) are not easy matches to defeat for many reasons including their merciless enforcers.

Even before making their first move, the possibility of defeat is clear to everyone including Curtis and his aging mentor Gilliam(John Hurt), who has been a de facto moral leader respected by everyone in the tail compartments. But it looks like they have a pretty good chance in this time; Curtis happens to get the information that there is a security technique expert named Namgoong Min-su(Song Kang-ho, who was the lead actor in “Memories of Murder”(2003) and “The Host”(2006)), and he can quickly unlock the gate of each compartment for them. After released from the prison compartment by Curtis, Min-su joins in Curtis’ plan on the condition that he can take his young daughter Yona(Ko Ah-seong) along with him while getting two pieces of hallucinogenic drug named Kronol for his job at every gate.

small_snowpiercer06

The movie has been advertised as an action movie, and there is indeed an impressive sequence where two opposing groups brutally clash with each other within one narrow space, but, to our delight, the movie turns out to be far more than that as Curtis and others desperately advance through the compartments one by one. The movie hurls us into a bloody mayhem at one point, and then it amazes us with what is inside some of the compartments, and then it ambushes us with more unexpected things in its compartments. The movie feels uneven and jarring at times because of that, but, it surprisingly creates some sort of harmony from that under the director Bong Joon-ho’s confident direction and offbeat sensibility, and the movie throws in a surprising moment of humor even when the characters are facing the matter of life and death. The movie invests considerable attention to its small but intriguing post-apocalyptic world and its colorful characters, and I was particularly amused by how protein bars handed to the tail compartment people are manufactured; when the recipe is revealed, Soylent Green will not look that bad to you in comparison.

The movie is based on the French graphic novel “Le Transperceneige” by Jacque Lob, Benjamin Legrand, and Jean-Marc Rochette. I have not read it yet, but I can say that Bong Joon-ho and his co-screenplay writer Kelly Masterson(he previously made an impressive debut with Sidney Lumet’s last work “Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead”(2007)) made a darkly engaging SF thriller drama from the original graphic novel. While there is the constant urgency driving its plot and characters, it sometimes slows its pace for letting us identify with the characters and be absorbed in their dystopian world, and the story never feels dragged even when it takes some rest with the characters for a moment. The more we advance with them, the more we feel that the stake is high for everyone involved in the conflict inside the train, and we also come to see that not every character is completely safe in this tumultuous situation as the movie ruthlessly rolling them on its unpredictable plot.

The movie also takes its time while looking around the interior of the train with fascination. Every compartment has its own function, and one of the most amusing sights is the school for the children of the front compartments. In their bright, pleasant classroom, the children eagerly participate in the lesson without questioning anything(Alison Pill is morbidly cheerful as their pregnant teacher), and we get some background history behind Wilford’s train through their old-fashioned education video.

small_snowpiercer05

And then the story becomes more about quest rather than action as it gets closer to the engine compartment, and the movie provokes certain questions which have been asked in its senior dystopian SF fictions. Is survival a greater good above everything including morality? Is it worthwhile to be inhuman for the better chance of preserving humanity? They say we human beings are capable of anything, but can we accept the cost of survival and move on no matter how big it is? I do not dare to tell you how these questions are presented at the arrival point of the story, but I must say it has been quite a while since I really felt the temptation growing inside the character facing the crucial moment of a difficult decision in the movie. None of the available options is an easy one; any choice is bound to be followed by its own weighty consequence, and the final scene can be interpreted as optimistic or pessimistic depending on your view.

This is Bong Joon-ho’s first feature film made outside South Korea, and he proves here that he can work competently with the international cast and crew. His cinematographer Hong Kyeong-pho does a terrific job of providing different ambiences along the storyline, and Steve M. Choe’s editing is sharp and efficient, and Marco Beltrami’ score is solid while never stepping out of the line. You may complain that its CGIs showing the exterior of the train look relatively cheaper than what you see from big Hollywood blockbusters, but it effectively serves the story and the actions inside it like any good special effects should do. We have no problem with accepting the fictional reality inside the movie, so we can believe the characters are really on the train going through some tricky parts of its line, and we get an ample amount of thrill and excitement as a result.

The cast is excellent, for they amplify their mostly simple roles with their talents and presences. I must confess that I had underestimated Chris Evans before watching his electrifying performance in “Puncture”(2011), and I am confirmed here again here that he can do a lot more than playing Captain America. There is a haunting moment when Curtis reveals his dark side to other character, and Evans is captivating to watch as conveying us the unspeakable horror remaining inside his character’s heart only with his performance.

small_snowpiercer02

The rest of the cast are equally memorable in their respective roles. Tilda Swinton gloriously embraces her despicable character with the attitude of mean British headmistress, and she is fearless as usual in throwing herself into the hammy side of her character. Jamie Bell, Octavia Spencer, and Ewen Bremner are some of more distinctive characters in the tail compartments, and John Hurt, a wonderful British actor who has always been suitable for playing a shabby intellectual since “Midnight Express”(1978) and “1984”(1984), instantly draws our attraction whenever he appears with remaining limbs. As the Colonel Kurtz/Oz the Great and Powerful of the movie, Ed Harris is as good as expected during his eventual appearance around the finale, and Song Kang-ho and Ko Ah-seong hold their own places while getting along well with their fellow performers(some of their dialogues are Korean, but the translator equipment comes handy to other characters in the train, so we can accept the scenes where one character speaks in Korean while the other speaking in English).

This year has been particularly interesting for South Korean audiences because three of their leading film directors attempted to make movies outside their usual territory. While Bong Joon-ho was making “Snowpiercer”, Kim Jee-woon made a pulpy B-action film with Arnold Schwartzenegger in “The Last Stand”(2013) as he wanted, and Park Chan-wook made a tense coming-of-age drama in “Stoker”(2013), which is as stylishly disturbing as his previous films. The degree of success is various in each case, but all prove that they are skillful directors who can wield their styles and talents even when making movies outside South Korea with a different language.

I admired Bong Joon-ho’s works for many reasons since I became a little more serious movie audience, and one of them is the unpredictability in his choice. He made me both laugh and cringe in a deadpan black comedy “Barking Dogs Never Bite”(2000), and then he played me like piano in his great country thriller film “Memories of Murder”(2003), and then he surprised me with monster film “The Host”(2006), and then he came back to another country thriller “Mother”(2009).

With “Snowpiercer”, he made another surprising choice, and he successfully solidifies his status again as one of great South Korean directors. The movie is as good as it can be as a science fiction story, and its problematic aspects on the story level can easily be overlooked while you are entertained by its wonderful sights. I still wonder about how the hell the train in the movie can run so fast and so long for more than 10 years, but, folks, how can possibly our hearts not be excited by the sight of this fantastic train zipping around the snowy post-apocalyptic world, especially if it is loaded with many things to admire and enjoy?

 Sidenote(2013/08/06): I heard later that the movie was acquired by the Weinstein company for the distribution in US, UK, South Africa, New Zealand, and Australia. According to this news, the company will probably butcher it by trimming at least 20 minutes. Please check the running time when the movie is released at the local theaters near your place, and avoid it if  it is a truncated version shorter than 126-min.  To be frank with you, there is nothing to cut in the film even though it is not perfect.

small_snowpiercer03

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Eye in the Sky (2007) ☆☆☆(3/4) : See everything – remember everything

eyeinthesky03Early in this month, I watched South Korean thriller film “Cold Eyes”, and I was excited by its thrilling story about the secret surveillance police team and the professional criminals they chase after. While being a well-made genre film with several fabulous scenes to remember, it is also supported by a bunch of good performances from its terrific cast, and, at least in my opinion, it is one of the best South Korean films of this year.

Before watching the movie, I came to learn that the movie is in fact a remake of Hong Kong thriller film “Eye in the Sky”(2007), which I had not watched mainly because the movie was not widely introduced to the South Korean audiences(it has been released neither in theaters nor on DVD in South Korea yet although it was introduced at the Jeonju International Film Festival in 2007). I was naturally curious about the original version after immensely enjoying its remake version, so I managed to find and then watch the former at last night, and it turned out to be a little competent thriller film worthwhile to be recommended. It surely looks shabby as a low-budget film compared to its slick South Korean cousin, but it has its own strong points as a tight, economical thriller piece, and it is as distinctive in many aspects as its remake version is.

The plot is simple. Constable Ho(Kate Tsui), a young rookie police officer, manages to pass a field test by Sergeant Wong(Simon Yam) during the opening sequence in the downtown area of Hong Kong, and she starts to work at Sergeant Wong’s secret police department not long after the big robbery incident at a nearby jewelry shop is reported. The robbery was planned by Chan(Tony Leung), a reticent criminal mastermind who always makes it sure that his plan is executed as planned while monitoring the situation and his men from above. Like Ho and Wong, he looks ordinary and unremarkable on the surface, and we are not surprised to see that he can quietly walk out of the crime scene without any difficulty once the job is done and then the police has arrived.

eyeinthesky01 Through various clues acquired during their clandestine investigation process, Wong and others at the department pursue Chan and his accomplices step by step.  At some shady office hidden from the public, the people at the department thoroughly check the video clips from many surveillance cameras placed around the city, and, once a possible target is spotted, it is the job of Sergeant Wong’s team to track down and follow the target while not noticed by anyone. Even if someone needs to be helped or rescued near them, they should not do anything except keeping focusing on their mission as the eyes of the police seeing everything and remembering everything.

The movie is directed and co-written by Yau Nai Hoi, who has written the screenplays for the Hong Kong crime noir films directed by the producer Johnnie To(their recent collaborations were “Drug War”(2012) and “Blind Detective”(2013)). The movie feels less polished compared to Johnnie To’s stylish works, but it is filled with gritty ambiance through the shabby urban sights of Hong Kong, and Yau Nai Hoi gives us good suspense scenes with subtle tension as its police characters approach closer to their target criminals. When one target is located, it is Ho’s job to find where he exactly lives in one cheap apartment building, and that certainly requires both patience and caution to her while not exposing anything to her target standing right next to her in a small space.

The characters are mostly broad and simple, but, while observing them in work, we come to see both cops and criminals as the tired people struggling in their hard world. Although he can be very harsh if necessary, Chan can be cordial and generous to his men who are bonded together as low-life criminals facing their waning days. Their works become more scarce and difficult nowadays, and Chan later asks his broker, who is also his incarcerated master’s wife, for a little more payment for him and his men during their meeting. She understands his difficulty with sympathy, but both know the rules in their business, and they quietly accept them.

eyeinthesky02Meanwhile, Wong and Ho and their colleagues are only a few steps behind Chan’s criminal clan, and they intuitively sense Chan’s presence although he is not detected in their surveillance network. While Chan is clever enough to evade them, Wong and Ho are sharp enough to follow him, and there is a suspenseful moment when Ho must remain calm and casual for not blowing her cover in front of her target who happens to recognize her by coincidence.

The performances in the film are solid. Simon Yam and Tony Leung are the most recognizable actors among the cast, but both actors mingle naturally with their co-actors on the screen without drawing our attention. Yam brings some humor to his character through his character’s habit of telling funny story to his colleagues, and Leung gives us a glimpse of his character’s soft side behind the stoic appearance during the brief scene where Chan encounters a man who shared lots of past with him. Kate Tsui is plucky as required as a rookie cop character, and she and Maggie Siu, who plays Wong’s feisty boss, imbue a strong female touch to the story mainly filled with male characters.

There are many scenes in the film which are transferred to its remake version, and they are consequently compared to their counterparts in the remake version in my mind. While “Eye in the Sky” is plain and gritty with its earnest appeal, “Cold Eyes” is saucy and polished as it puts more characterization and skills on the original story modified with small and big changes. I think I like “Cold Eyes” more, but I also think you should check out “Eye in the Sky” along with “Cold Eyes”, for appreciating how well one good movie can be reconfigured into the other good film.

eyeinthesky04

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment