The Interview (2014) ☆☆(2/4) : An insipid comedy less funny than its hoopla

theinterview01  I am sure most of you have already heard about all these fusses around a comedy film called “The Interview”. The movie was scheduled to get a wide release in US and Canada in last December, but Sony suddenly canceled its theatrical release right after an anonymous hacking attack on the company’s computer network, which was thought to be associated with North Korea. The movie drew lots of attention from the media thanks to this incident, and then, as the audiences consequently became more eager to watch, Sony eventually released it around a small number of movie theaters on Christmas while also releasing through Internet streaming services.

A few weeks have passed now, and this incident and the following unwise decision made by Sony look sillier than before. In fact, this was actually a far funnier farce compared to the movie itself, an insipid comedy which does not provide many laughs despite its outrageous premise. It could have been a good starting point for funny satire with some edges, but its goofy plot goes for familiar raunchy comedy instead, and the movie even fails even in that attempt while scoring only one or two laughs during its running time.

The best part of the film happens during its first 10 minutes, and it is not even involved with its main target. Dave Skylark, played by James Franco with the tiresome attitude of a grating overachiever, is the host of a popular TV talk show ‘Skylark’, and he and his friend/producer Aaron Rapaport (Seth Rogen) hit another glorious moment of their rising respective careers when a certain well-known rapper, who is excellent in his deadpan cameo appearance, flatly comes out of the closet right in the middle of Dave’s broadcast interview.

While enjoying their continuing success, Aaron, who has always wanted a more serious career, feels more of his growing discontent with their shallow talk show which is full of superficial celebrity gossips, but then he sees an interesting opportunity when he happens to learn that Kim Jung-un, the infamous new dictator of North Korea, is a fan of their talk show. He attempts to make a contact with the North Korean government, and, surprise, the North Korean government approaches to him faster than expected. Although Kim Jung-un himself will not come to New York for interview, he invites Aaron and Dave to Pyongyang instead, and he is willing to be interviewed exclusively by Dave under a few conditions which Aaron and Dave has no problem with.

theinterview02 Aaron and Dave cannot possibly be more excited by this golden opportunity to be envied by many journalists around the world, but then they get into a more serious situation when they are visited by CIA agents, who want Aaron and Dave to assassinate Kim Jung-un. Because North Korea has recently become a bigger threat thanks to more nuclear weapons and more powerful rockets, CIA wants to eliminate Kim Jung-un, and Agent Lacey (Lizzy Caplan) and others see Dave’s interview as a very good chance even though Dave is apparently not reliable as an assassin to be trained.

Anyway, Dave and Aaron agree to collaborate with CIA, and they soon arrive at Pyongyang with a specially designed assassination tool which looks a lot like a band-aid. After the greeting at the airport, they are immediately sent to Kim Jung-un’s big palace as accompanied with a young propaganda officer Sook (Diana Bing in a thankless Asian stereotype character), and then they meet Kim Jung-un, who is broadly played by Randall Park with lots of smiles somewhere between Mao Zedong and Kim Jung-un’s notorious grandfather Kim Il-sung.

To Dave and Aaron’s surprise, Kim Jung-un turns out to be more likable while still being your average spoiled despot, and Dave finds himself having a great time with Kim Jung-un as they have lots of juvenile fun with vehicles, drinks, and sexy women ready to serve them. Aaron naturally becomes concerned about this because it may not only compromise their secret mission but also endanger him and his friend, and that accordingly strains their relationship as Dave and Kim Jung-un hang around with each other more day by day.

theinterview03 Like “Pineapple Express” (2008), “The Interview” attempts a raunchy bromance comedy amid outrageous moments, but it frequently falters during many of its attempts. The story by the directors Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg and their co-writer Dan Sterling is mostly predictable in its plot turns, and many comic scenes are flat and uninspired without enough amount of surprise, which is always a crucial element of good comedy. There is actually one moment that did surprise me with a shot of bad taste involved with bodily fluids, but that moment is not very funny either as I think more about it.

Seth Rogen and James Franco are talented comedians as shown in their works including “Pineapple Express” and “This is the End” (2013), but they are stuck with a bad script in this time. While Franco tries too hard to be an obnoxious self-absorbed jerk, Rogen tries to complement Franco with his usual likable presence, but he also has his own cringe-inducing moments such as when his character must hide a metal carrier into one of his orifices (please don’t ask me about the location). Randall Park is adequate as Kim Jung-un, but he lacks menace as the megalomaniac bad guy of the story, and the shoot-them-up climax of the film feels particularly weak as it lets his character get off too easily.

“The interview” is a lazy, pointless comedy which sadly wastes its satiric potentials, but it has a right to be shown to the audiences like any other films none the less, and I am glad about its eventual release although I do not recommend it at all. As a South Korean guy who hates North Korea and despises its deranged dictatorship, I may say that I am one of its ideal target audiences, but, boy, this is not even funny to me at all.

theinterview04

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Penguins of Madagascar (2014) ☆☆☆(3/4) : Penguins back in action

penguinsofmadagascar01  The penguins are back, and they take the spotlight in this time. “Penguins of Madagascar”, which is a spin-off sequel of the Madagascar series, is as busy and crazy as you can expect from a standard animation product packed the series of exciting hyperbolic action sequences, and that will probably keep you engaged as long as you do not mind about its thin plot and characterization. It loses its steam especially around the climax part, but it moves quick and fast throughout its short running time, and, though it is less satisfying than the better installments of the franchise, it is still fun to watch these bumbling penguins bouncing around several wild moments as preposterous as James Bond movies.

Its prologue sequence tells us how they happened to leave the Antarctic area when they were young, and it is accompanied with one of the funniest jokes in the film. As a long line of penguins is moving along their usual migration track, we hear the deadpan narration by none other than Werner Herzog as a documentary filmmaker, and his recognizable voice certainly adds an extra layer of self-conscious humor to this moment while penguins casually recognize that they do not have much thought on their habit or the documentary crew shooting them right now.

But our penguin heroes were a bit different from other penguins because of their willingness to go further for whatever mission they can think of, and they eventually went through many adventures or misadventures as shown in three previous films and one TV series. I must confess that it initially took some time for me to tell who is Skipper or Kowalski, but these penguins are a lot more distinctive than ninja turtles thanks to their simple but colorful personalities. While Skipper (voiced by Tom McGrath) is their overconfident leader, Kowalski (voiced by Chris Miller) thinks of their plans which usually do not go well, and Rico (voiced by Conrad Vernon) can swallow many various things to be stored in his stomach, and Private (voiced by Christopher Knights) is more like a rookie who still has lots of things to learn from his senior penguins.

penguinsofmadagascar02 After the prologue scene, the story immediately goes to the point not long after the ending of “Madagascar 3: Europe’s Most Wanted” (2012). Although they had a big success through their circus business with other animals (most of the other characters in the previous films do not appear in this film, by the way), the penguins are eager for another risky mission, and they are about to break into the Fort Knox in Kentucky for something which turns out to be far more modest than Auric Goldfinger’s goal.

Unfortunately, they soon get captured right on the spot by a super-villain waiting for them in advance, so we get a classic case of talking villain syndrome when they are taken to Dr. Octavius Brine (voiced by John Malkovich with his usual silky loftiness), a megalomaniac scientist who is revealed to be the human disguise of an evil octopus named Dave. Dave has nurtured his personal anger toward penguins since his popularity was decreased by their inherent cuteness which stole many zoo visitors’ attention from him, and, using his recently developed special serum, he is about to initiate a diabolical plan for his revenge on the penguins around the world.

While the details of Dr. Octavius’ vengeful plan do not exactly feel fresh to you if you have seen “Despicable Me 2” (2013), “Penguins of Madagascar” compensates for that and its other weak points to some degrees through its brisk handling of jokes and actions. The directors Simon J. Smith and Eric Danell keep the story jumping around the various locations in the world as maintaining its quick narrative pace, and the action sequences in their film are handled well with enough excitement while many jokes are constantly thrown into the screen.

penguinsofmadagascar04 Meanwhile, we are also introduced to several new characters. After they manage to escape from Dr. Octavius, the penguins encounter a group of super-spy animals led by a wolf named Classified (voiced by Benedict Cumberbatch), who is the head of the North Wind. Cumberbatch ably handles the jokes in his scenes while mostly sounding quite serious, and his unflappable voice performance works as a good counterpart to the bouncy voice performances by Tom MaGrath, Chris Miller, Conrad Vernon, and Christopher Kinghts, who play along well with each other with a good teamwork spirit as before.

Although not everything is successful in its final result, “Penguins of Madagascar” is a well-made animation film to enjoy despite its visible weaknesses. A romantic subplot between Kowalski and one of Classified’s team members is rather pointless (is it obligatory for every Madagascar movie to insert at least one interspecies romance into their plot?), and its climax sequence feels dragged at times as going back and forth between action and comedy a little too frequently.

When I watched the first film of the Madagascar series in 2005, I was not so impressed by it, and then I was rather surprised by the notable improvement in the following installments. “Penguins of Madagascar” is a little one step down from the peak of the franchise, but I give it 3 stars because I had a fairly nice time during the early screening of this morning. You will probably forget many of its fun moments not long after watching it, but it gives you as much as you pay for your ticket at least.

penguinsofmadagascar05

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Space Station 76 (2014) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4) : One-joke space comedy in retro style

small_spacestation01 If you have ever had a guilty pleasure moment with those dated SF films from the 1970s, “Space Station 76” may appeal to you to some degrees as an one-joke space comedy which tries to hang its tongue on the cheek while trying to keep its straight face as much as it can in its retro style. The movie deliberately looks corny, and I am sort of amused by its intentional cheesiness, but this mildly funny pastiche feels so straight in its dry mood that it sometimes looks quite humorless as losing its way somewhere between homage and spoof.

Its story is unfolded within a space station located somewhere far, far away from the Earth. As told to us through the opening narration, the human race has advanced into many corners of the universe in the distant future, and it is the main job of Captain Glenn (Patrick Wilson) and others at this space station to take care of the intergalactic traffic around their area as providing fuel and other various services like those rest areas on highways.

Despite such technological advances, it seems the humanity in this world has unfortunately been stuck in the mentality of the 1970s. While it surely looks like a nice-looking model on the outside, the space station looks hilariously tacky in the inside thanks to its clean, bright white interior design which will certainly make some of you feel nostalgic about many old SF films from the 1970s, and its inhabitants look and behave as if they were American middle-class suburban people during that era. Bored with their eventless daily life, some of them look for a way to deal with their ongoing ennui in the middle of the space, and we get several silly moments involved with Dr. Bot (voiced by Michael Stoyanova, who co-wrote the screenplay), a cute little psychiatrist robot who flatly delivers those superficial words based on the popular psychology of the 1970s whenever his patients want the advices for their personal problems.

small_spacestation02 Meanwhile, a new crew member has recently arrived at the space station as Captain Glenn’s new second-in-command. Still feeling sour about the recent departure of her predecessor for some reason, Captain Glenn does not welcome Jessica (Liv Tyler) much, but this kind, gentle, and dutiful woman keeps her composure as trying to do her duties under her grumpy boss who gets frequently drunk even during his work hours.

While she goes through her first days at the space station, we meet the other characters who have lived here for years. Its chief mechanic Ted (Matt Bomer) and his self-absorbed wife Misty (Marisa Coughlan) have been estranged from each other, and Ted sometimes enjoys his own naughty space fantasy during his spare time while his wife is having an affair with Steve (Jerry O’Connell), who does not mind having a little fun while looking forward to leaving the space station someday with his wife and their newborn child (and his mother under cryogenic care). Misty and Ted have a little daughter named Sunshine (Kylie Rogers), and this lonely girl who had no one to hang around with is glad to befriend Jessica, who also likes Sunshine a lot as regarding her like a daughter she will never have.

As the characters slowly rotate around its loose plot, the movie throws various silly details onto the screen as small and big visual gags. The ‘futuristic’ technologies shown in the film may tickle you for good reasons (do you remember when is the last time you used videotapes?), and its cheap special effects look as unrealistic as you can expect from a dated SF film made during the 1970s, and its production design and costumes further emphasize its retro style along with corny dialogues.

small_spacestation03

This looks like a fertile ground for satire, but the movie frequently feels like a languid exercise in cheesiness while merely setting up its background. I understand that it is not intended as something as hysterical as “Spaceballs” (1987), but its thin plot aimlessly plods around its background like a lame soap drama episode, and its cardboard characters become far less funny once we get past its joke on their one-dimensional silliness. They look ludicrous as intended, but there is not much else besides that, and we do not care or worry much about them even though the movie keeps warning us of an approaching asteroid at least more than 5 or 6 times during its short running time.

The actors know that it is the best to act straight with all these ridiculous materials given to them, and they did their job well as demanded. While Patrick Wilson effectively sets the tone right from his first scene, Liv Tyler maintains her gentle grace intact as holding herself well in front of many silly moments, and Matt Bomer brings sly humor into his character while looking sincere and daunted all the time. There is one funny scene in which Jessica and Ted try to deal with their growing mutual feelings during their private conversation, and Tyler and Bomer did an admirable job of looking very serious as their characters awkwardly try to handle an embarrassing happening involved with Ted’s rather problematic prosthetic hand.

“Space Station 76” is not entirely without humor, but it is an one-joke stretched a little too long for me. Although I was not that bored thanks to some nice comic touches including a humorous cameo appearance by Keir Dullea, who played one of the main characters in “2001: A Space Odyssey” (1968), I frequently felt impatient even while appreciating the efforts put behind the screen by the director/co-writer Jack Plotnick and his crew. In spite of having everything ready to be spoofed, the movie somehow never feels like going on a full-throttle mode which would have made it into something more memorable, and we only watch it passing by us while nothing happens much in the end.

small_spacestation04

 

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Obvious Child (2014) ☆☆☆(3/4) : Stand-up comedy, Romance, and Abortion

obviouschild02 Some stand-up comedians try to distance themselves from life through comedy as their shield while others try to deal with life through comedy as their spear. In case of the flawed heroine of “Obvious Child”, she belongs to the latter, and she willingly uses the details of her private life to draw laughs from her audiences. As watching her performances, we see more of her personality ready to be expressed freely in front of others, and we understand more of how she uses her sense of humor to move through her imperfect life, which still demands her to grow up more.

When we see Jenny Slate (Donna Stern) doing her usual stand-up comedy performance at some small club in New York during the opening scene, she goes straight into very sensitive areas including a certain body part of hers as well as her current romantic relationship. This can be pretty embarrassing for both sides if she makes any big misstep during her monologue, but she succeeds in making the audiences laugh along with her, and it is really amusing to see how she pulls it off as being quite frank about herself in front of her audiences.

However, her current boyfriend Ryan (Paul Briganti) is clearly not so pleased about how she makes jokes on their sex life in public, and he tells her that he is going to leave her for one of her friends. While trying to handle this sudden bad news, Donna receives another bad news to deal with; a local bookstore where she has worked for 5 years is now about to be closed down due to financial problems, and that means she has to depend on her parents for a while.

This is indeed a hard situation, but she has several people to help and support her at least. Her roommate Nellie (Gaby Hoffman) and fellow comedian Gene (Stephen Singer) try to cheer up their friend as spending more time with her, and her father Jacob (Richard Kind) gives some pep talks to his daughter as a loving father while his divorced wife Nancy (Polly Draper) is also willing to help her daughter if she wants.

obviouschild03 During one evening when she gives a disastrously embarrassing performance fueled by lots of alcohol, she happens to meet a young guy named Max (Jake Lacy) at the club. Although they are total stranger to each other, something sparks as they talk more with each other, and they later go to his place. While both of them are quite drunk around that point, they clearly enjoy each other’s company none the less, and they eventually go to his bed at the end of their exhilarating night. As soon as she wakes up in the next morning, Donna quietly leaves his place, and that looks like the end of a simple one-night stand which was pretty fun and exciting to both of them.

However, after a few weeks, Donna realizes she is pregnant because of that one-night stand. She decides to have an abortion because she is not ready for motherhood, but then she and Max happen to meet each other again, and, as finding herself more attracted to this nice guy, she begins to ask herself on whether she must tell him about her pregnancy – and the following decision made by her.

Abortion is surely a serious matter, and the movie handles its sensitive subject with care and respect while never losing its sense of humor. Donna’s first visit to a gynecological clinic is depicted under thoughtful mood, but, as a professional comedian, Donna cannot prevent herself from observing a glaring irony when she is notified of her abortion schedule. She and her friends do have some laughs during their following conversation on her abortion, but they are all well aware of that it is not a trivial matter for herself at all, and she continues to wonder whether she really can move on to the next stage of her life after her abortion.

The movie is based on a short film directed by its director/co-writer Gillian Robespierre (this is her first feature film). While sprinkled with intimate moments of low-key humor, her movie is engaging to watch thank to its good dialogues and solid characterization, and its stand-up comedy performances feel natural and improvised right at the spot rather than something written in advance.

obviouschild01  Robespierre thought of Jenny Slate as her lead actress right from the beginning, and Slate gives a warm, likable performance as a young amiable woman with human flaws we can recognize and understand with smiles. Donna still has some immature sides inside her, but we can always see her good nature just like other characters around her, and we come to like her more as getting to know more about her. Slate is particularly good as her character tries to juggle her clashing emotions on the stage during one crucial moment in the film, and it is both entertaining and touching to watch Donna doing her best for maintaining the right tone for her performance and, most of all, herself. Whenever she hits right notes, she is really funny, and we cannot help but smile and cheer for her when that happens.

Slate is surrounded by a number of good supporting performers who provide extra dose of humor and warmth to the movie. Gabby Hoffman, Stephen Singer, Richard Kind, David Cross, and Polly Draper have each own moment along the story, and Jake Lacy has a lovely moment when his character does a small act of consideration for Donna. Donna and Max only begin to know each other bit by bit through the series of their coincidental encounters, but such a considerate act of his touches her a lot, and it makes her all the more conflicted about what she should do if she really wants to pursue the possible relationship with him.

Balancing itself well between humor and honesty, “Obvious Child” is a smart comedy which can be funny and heartfelt at the same time. I was only mildly amused during my first viewing, but then I was more entertained during the second viewing as observing more of its direct and thoughtful approach to its main subject. There is surely nothing to laugh about abortion itself, but we sometime deal with our difficult life matters through humor, don’t we?

obviouschild04

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

How to Steal a Dog (2014) ☆☆☆(3/4) : A little innocent kidnapping plan

howtostealadog06 Stealing is a wrong deed, but South Korean comedy film “How to Steal a Dog” is pleasant enough to make you to forget that for a while. Its little heroine simply wants to be a little happier, so she comes to concoct a small criminal plan for that, and we cannot help but be amused by how funny and absurd her plan is – and how innocent and misguided she is.

When she is with her best friend and other schoolmates at her elementary school, Ji-so (Lee Re) looks like an ordinary school kid, but it is soon shown that she has been hiding her recent difficult family situation from others at her school. After his pizza business was failed, Ji-so’s father left the family with no promise of return, and then she and her mother Jeong-heyon (Kang Hye-jeong) and younger brother Ji-seok (Hong Eun-taek) had to move out of their home and then live in a pizza delivery van left by her father.

It initially looked like they had to endure this hardship for one or two weeks, but now the van virtually becomes their new home, and Ji-so is frustrated about this continuing circumstance with no visible end. Although her mother is quite adamant about taking care of their family matter for herself without getting any help from others, nothing seems to be getting better for her and her kids, and Ji-so seriously wonders whether they can ever get out of their van.

And then she gets one idea about how to get money for her family. She and her best friend Chae-rang (Lee Ji-won) come across an leaflet from missing pet’s owner, which promises 5,000,000 won (around 4,500 dollar) as the reward. Realizing that rich people are willing to pay money for their pets, Ji-so decides to kidnap a pet precious enough for getting 5,000,000 won, and Chae-rang, who remains as her friend even after discovering Ji-so’s family problem, gladly joins as her criminal partner.

howtostealadog04 They search for any suitable target for them, and then they eventually find a good one. Ji-so’s mother is recently employed at a fancy restaurant through her past acquaintance with its manager, and the manager’s aunt, a rich old lady who owns this place, always comes with her pet russell terrier dog. When Ji-so and Chae-rang drop by the restaurant during one afternoon, they soon notice the old lady and her dog, and they instantly begin to prepare themselves for stealing this dog. First, they check its daily routine, and then they proceed to making a ‘perfect plan’ for how to kidnap the dog while not getting noticed by anyone – and, of course, how to take care of it while waiting for the old lady to put a notice on her missing dog.

What these girls plan to do is technically a crime, but the movie keeps its mood light and cheerful while not wholly ignoring that dark aspect and the daily hardships Ji-so and her family struggle with. As Ji-so and Chae-rang are working on their colorful plan book which will certainly get A from any art school teacher, Ji-so and her family crash into another bottom after her mother gets fired, and they later find themselves spending one night at a place where you will surely avoid for good reasons. While this is one of amusing moments in the movie, its laughs come with their hard reality, and we come to understand more of Ji-so’s wish to live in a better place through her rather naive criminal plan (if you live in Seoul or any cities around it, you know you cannot possibly get a nice home only with 5,000,000 won).

As Ji-so and Chae-rang try to execute their plan, it becomes apparent that things will not go easily as planned for a couple of reasons. While their target turns out to be quite smart at times as shown during one funny sequence in the middle of the story, it is revealed later that the old lady’s nephew, an opportunistic guy who has been looking forward to inheriting the money from his aunt someday, has his own plan behind his back. In addition, as she gets to know more about the old lady while pushing her plan, Ji-so realizes that she is not as tough as she thought at first.

howtostealadog02 The movie is based on Barbara O’Connor’s novel, which, as far as I heard from others, is a darker story with more edges. The director Kim Seong-ho, who also adapted the novel for his movie, keeps things afloat through a number of comic situations which drew nice chuckles from me and other audiences, and he also maintains an appropriate level of seriousness to make us care about his main characters. While the old lady turns out to be a lot less heartless than she seemed to be at first, we also see more of how much Ji-so’s mother has tried hard even though she is not exactly a model mom to her kids, and Ji-so comes to learn a few important lessons as she tries to make things right around the later part of the story. The movie becomes more melodramatic as approaching to the finale, but we accept that change of mode as caring about Ji-so and several other characters, and the movie wisely holds itself well with enough amount of tears for its intended dramatic effects.

While there are several recognizable South Korean actors including Kim Hye-ja (some of you probably remember her unforgettable performance in Bong Joon-ho’s “Mother” (2009)), Choi Min-soo, Kang Hye-jeong, and Lee Cheon-hee in the film, its child actors still remain as the center of the story, and they give likable natural performances you may want to hug. Lee Re is splendid in her scenes with adult co-stars, and she and her fellow child actress Lee Ji-won feel spontaneous in their scenes. Hong Eun-taek is also a fun to watch as Ji-so’s little brother who turns out to be a little smarter than his sister thought (I was constantly amused by his surprisingly no-nonsense comments on his sister’s plan), and I can you assure you that the dog in the movie will steal your heart – especially if you are a dog lover.

Though it is not without flaws and it could have more been more effective through cutting around 10 minutes of its running time, “How to Steal a Dog” is a sweet and sincere comedy film to be enjoyed by family audiences. I am not that sure about whether it will be one of South Korean films to remember at the end of 2015, but this funny movie was surely a nice way for me and others to start 2015 anyway.

howtostealadog01

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

10 movies of 2014 – and more: Part 3

And now here is the list of 10 South Korean films you should not miss.

Continue reading →

Posted in Movies | 2 Comments

10 movies of 2014 – and more: Part 2

And here are the other 5 movies in my list – with other films good enough to be mentioned. Continue reading →

Posted in Movies | Leave a comment

10 movies of 2014 – and more: Part 1

Here are the first 5 movies in my list.

Continue reading →

Posted in Movies | Leave a comment

10 movies of 2014 – and more: Introduction

phd040207s

It is near the end of 2014, and I am also now at the end of one long chapter of my life. In 2015 February, I will graduate from Korean Advanced Institute of Science and Technology with Ph.D. degree in Biological Science, but I still cannot believe that my struggling academic years at the KAIST campus will soon be finished. I was once labelled as a hopeless underachiever by many people at my department, but I somehow managed to go through my proposal in last year, and then I passed the defense for my doctoral dissertation around 4 weeks ago.

Meanwhile, my love of movie had a brutal rampage during last 2 weeks after everything was finished for my upcoming graduation. I wrote 27 reviews in this month, and now I am writing this after almost completing the annual list of good films I watched during this year. Although I have not seen “Birdman”, “The Imitation Game”, “Selma”, “Whiplash”, “A Most Violent Year”, “Still Alice”, “Wild”, “Foxcatcher”, “Nightcrawler”, “American Sniper”, “Mr. Turner”, and “Inherent Vice”, I will certainly review them in the next year, and they will be probably listed in the annual list of 2015 if they are really as good as people have told me.

As usual, I will start with my 10 favorite films of this year, and then I will move to two categories of the other good films I want to mention. After that, I will mention a number of recommendable documentaries and animation films I watched in this year, and the list of 10 South Korean films of this year will then follow.

 

 

Posted in Movies | 2 Comments

The Book of Life (2014) ☆☆☆(3/4) : A colorful romp on Day of the Dead

thebookoflife03 While it is a little too silly and frantic for me at times, “The Book of Life” is a colorful animation film decorated with several gorgeous sights to enjoy. Its story and characters are rather thin and predictable, and my level of interest was decreased around its action-packed climax in which lots of animation characters run or bounce around the screen, but it leaves some good impressions on me mainly due to its overflowing quirky style which deserves a better story then the movie itself provides.

Once upon a time, as told to a bunch of visiting kids at some big museum during the opening scene, there was a town called San Angel in Mexico, and we meet the three main characters of the story: Manolo (voiced by Diego Luna), Joaquín (voiced by Channing Tatum), and María (vocied by Zoe Saldana). Manolo and Joaquín have been eager to get María’s affection since their childhood, and their early romantic competition on their mutual friend happens to draw the attention of two supernatural entities on the Day of the Dead, a Mexican holiday which I came to learn for the first time through Malcolm Lowry’s dark, harrowing alcoholic masterpiece “Under the Volcano” and John Huston’s equally unforgettable 1984 adaptation.

After watching on a love triangle between these three kids, La Muerte (voiced by Kate del Castillo), a feisty goddess who rules the Land of the Remembered, makes a bet with her husband Xibalba (voiced by Ron Perlman), a wily god who rules the Land of the Forgotten. If Manolo wins María’s love, Xibalba will never interfere with the matters of mortals, and La Muerte will exchange her place with Xibalba’s if Joaquín wins instead. La Murete gives her blessing to young Manolo later, and Xibalba gives young Joaquín a magic badge, which will make him invincible in any dangerous circumstance.

thebookoflife02  Several years later, María returns to San Angel after finishing her education in Europe, and two boys are ready to impress her. While he is more interested in pursuing musician career, Manolo has also been trained as a skillful bull fighter as demanded by his family tradition, and he is willing to enter the arena for María although he does not like killing bulls. In case of Joaquín, he has been regarded as the new defender of the town mainly thanks to the power of his magic badge, and General Posada (voiced by Carlos Alazraqui), María’s grumpy old father who is also the leader of the town, supports Joaquín’s wish to marry María.

After a number of silly comic situations involved with the courtships of Manolo and Joaquín toward to a woman they both love as before, María finds herself drawn to more to Manolo, but, unfortunately, he is soon tumbled into the realm of afterlife before María accepts his proposal. Determined to return to his woman, he starts his journey across the realm of afterlife, and there are several perils he must go through for reuniting with her.

As a fantasy story packed with larger-than-life caricatures whose personalities are mainly and instantly defined by their appearances, the movie does not feel the need to look realistic, so it gleefully goes wild with its own style. While they are digital animation characters, the characters in the film are imbued with the texture of wooden puppets, and that unusual rendering provides extra visual amusement for us. They certainly do not look that realistic, but they look more stylish and colorful as fantasy tale characters, and I must confess that I was rather amused by how some of the characters in the film look more like trolls or some other kinds of monsters because of their exaggerated body parts.

thebookoflife04  And the movie has plenty of things to unleash on the screen as the story steps into the realm of afterlife. Drenched in bright, vibrant colors, the Land of the Remembered are stuffed with lovely details as a place where everyone is always on festive mood, and the Land of the Forgotten makes a striking contrast through its dark, desolate landscapes where forgotten souls are soaked in their miserable solitude. There is also a wondrous place called the Cave of Souls, and we meet an ebullient entity called the Candle Maker (voiced by Ice Cube), who supervises the matters of the living while being surrounded by thousands of candles representing countless lives on the Earth.

As hopping around difference places during its later part, the movie throws more stuffs into the story, and that is where it becomes shakier. Its finale is involved with a bunch of nasty bandits who are going to wipe out San Angel and its people, and I began to feel a bit lost and tired as watching lots of frantic actions zipping across the screen. This sequence is not entirely without fun and excitement, but I have seen other similar animation action stuffs for years, and it did not particularly interest me much.

The actors are well-cast while providing nice voice performances to the film. Diego Luna, Channing Tatum, and Zoe Saldana handle their stereotype characters well with humor and energy, and Ron Perlman and Kate del Castillo are well-matched as two opposing forces who are still attracted to each other despite their rocky relationship. The most fun in the film comes from Ice Cube, and he certainly enjoys every minute of his scenes with lots of irrepressible jolly spirit for his avuncular character.

The director/co-screenplay writer Jorge Gutierrez did a competent job in making a good-looking animation film coupled with interesting cultural flavor, but “The Book of Life”, which was co-produced by Guillermo del Toro, is not entirely successful for several reasons. Its occasional use of modern pop songs are not that effective in many cases, and I have some doubt on whether the museum part works. I had a fair share of entertainment during my viewing, and it is surely a lot more cheerful than “Under the Volcano”, but I still think it could have been better.

small_thebookoflife05

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment