Foxcatcher (2014) ☆☆☆(3/4) : Bound for Hollow Glory

foxcatcher01 Always maintaining its reticent attitude with the sense of doom, “Foxcatcher” is quietly examines its stranger-than-fiction story which can be interpreted as a morbid American tragedy of ambition and madness. It demands us considerable patience at times mainly because of its slow pace and glacial mood, and the baffling enigma inside its story is still remained to be a big question mark even when it is over, but its assured direction and three main performances hold our attention as its low-key tension is slowly boiling beneath the screen. Even when its mood becomes a little more optimistic, there are always uneasy and ominous feelings around the screen, and you can sense that something bad will happen sooner or later even if you are not that familiar with a dark real-life story which inspired the movie.

The story begins with Mark Schultz (Channing Tatum), an Olympic wrestling champion who has been stuck in a squalid life for a while since his victory at the 1984 LA Olympics. He may attend the upcoming 1988 Seoul Olympics, but things have not been very good for him. His current residence feels barren and empty except all those trophies and medals he won, and he barely earns a living through motivation speech for elementary school kids, and we also learn that he has always been living under the shadow of his older brother Dave Schultz (Mark Ruffalo), who is also an Olympic wrestling champion and has far more fame and respect than his little big brother (the Schultz brothers are still only brothers who won both World and Olympic championships).

You can see the pain in Mark’s face when his brother’s name is mentioned during one small scene, but he has no hard feeling on Dave even though his caring brother’s presence always makes him feel inferior. He just wants to be something like Dave, but he is still unsure and confused about what to do with his life, and he only gets more frustrated day by day. Channing Tatum, who has never been so good like this, effectively uses his hefty physicality to convey the inner side of his troubled character; he looks a bit stiff at first with terse mannerism, but then he slowly reveals a big lug still inarticulate and awkward inside his virile body, and we come to see sad, quiet desperation inside Tatum’s surprisingly nuanced performance.

foxcatcher02 At least, he has Dave, but Mark is not a very social guy compared to his brother who hangs around well with many other guys in his field, and we have a poignant scene when Dave happens to meet his brother at Mark’s usual gym. Not many words are exchanged between them as they have some private moment for their wresting match, but their mingling bodies tell a lot more about their complex relationship than words, and we sense both the bond and the gap between these two brothers as they warm up their bodies and then try to overwhelm each other on the floor.

On one day, Mark gets a surprise call from John E. du Pont (Steve Carell), the heir of one of the wealthiest families in US. As a wrestling enthusiast, du Pont assembles a wrestling team to be trained for the 1988 Seoul Olympics, and he wants Mark to join his team which will soon begin training at his big family estate in Pennsylvania. Mark accepts this offer, and he soon arrives at the du Pont estate where everything is ready for du Pont’s Team Foxcatcher, which named after their family farm where his aging mother Jean (Vanessa Redgrave) has raised thoroughbreds.

When Mark meets du Pont for the first time at du Pont’s mansion, it becomes pretty much clear to us that du Pont is someone you cannot easily deal with. Wearing a big prosthetic nose and heavy make-ups, Steve Carell did a challenging job of playing an aloof, unlikable man who is born to be an eyesore, and his chilly performance always throws uncomfortable vibes into the screen while seldom revealing what is really behind his peculiar appearance which feels increasingly grotesque along the progress of the story.

Like Mark wants to make an impression of his own outside his brother’s reputation, du Pont wants to make an achievement of his own through wresting competition, and it is also implied that he wants to prove himself to his mother, who looks down on her son’s enthusiasm toward ‘low’ sports. He is determined to attain his goal of leaving his own legacy in the American sports history, and he certainly has all the money necessary for that. After all, he is a very rich man, and everything can be bought in his view.

foxcatcher03 While he cannot recruit Dave, du Pont has Mark instead, and it looks like a nice partnership to both of them at the beginning. Mark is happy to move to a far better place than before, and he also does a good training job on du Pont’s wrestling team while keeping his wealthy employer satisfied. Despite some eccentric behaviors, du Pont begins to regard Mark as his friend although he clearly does not have any normal concept of friendship (he tells Mark later that his only ‘friend’ he has ever known in his life turned out to be paid by his mother). He tries to get along with Mark and other wrestlers, but he still looks as pathetic and ridiculous as before, and his banal speeches for his team feel creepier as the movie observes more of how isolated he is from others. He can fill his office with many expensive antiques he bought, but he is still alone in his world while barely connected with others only through his vast wealth, and he sometimes looks like a petty version of Charles Foster Kane.

The situation becomes darker as Mark is drawn into du Pont’s decadent side (Tatum and Carell have a morbidly humorously scene in which their characters keep saying “Ornithologist, Philatelist, Philanthropist.” as getting high with cocaine during their helicopter ride to Washington D.C.), and that eventually leads to the arrival of Dave and his family at the Foxcatcher farm. Dave tries to make things go right and smoothly, but then Mark hits the bottom as feeling angry and frustrated about being overshadowed by his brother again. Tatum has a couple of intense and painful moments as he bravely hurls himself into his character’s deep despair, and it is rather shame that he is not mentioned often during the ongoing award season unlike his two co-stars.

Meanwhile, Dave finds himself in a difficult circumstance when he must carefully balance himself between his integrity and his boss. Mark Ruffalo, who mainly functions as the sole voice of common sense in the film, gives an engaging performance as a simple decent man with genuine care and dedication, and there is a very good scene in which his character tries not to compromise his principles in front of the camera. Dave certainly does not want any unnecessary trouble with du Pont, but then he finds it pretty difficult to say any sincere good words on his erratic employer, and Ruffalo is fabulous to watch when his character struggles to find anything nice to say about his boss while not lying.

small_foxcatcher04 “Foxcatcher” is directed by Bennett Miller, who previously directed “Capote” (2005) and “Moneyball” (2011) and also received the Best Director award for this film at the Cannes Film Festival in last year. He keeps the mood somber and restrained even during a number of wrestling match scenes in the film, and the screenplay by E. Max Frye and Dan Futterman (he previously collaborated with Miller in “Capote”) stays still and neutral as subtly suggesting the dark currents of emotions churning behind its main characters. The potential of catastrophe slowly grows amid their shifty relationships, and then the catastrophe does happen in the end with a devastating result for everyone.

While it can be regarded as a thinking man’s sports film like “Moneyball”, “Foxcatcher” is closer to “Capote”, which was also a cold, restrained drama inspired by a real-life crime story. However, “Foxcatcher” ultimately fails to go deeper into its characters or the enigma in their troubled relationships, and it feels uneven and unsatisfying especially when its story eventually takes a course to the inevitable point in the end. Despite Carell’s good efforts, du Pont, who died in 2010, remains as an elusive outsider beyond our understanding in the film except his Freudian relationship with his mother and his repressed sexuality, and its notable supporting actors including Sienna Miller and Anthony Michael Hall look more like extras while not having many things to do.

Nevertheless, “Foxcatcher” has some merits including the performances by Carell, Tatum, and Ruffalo. I am still sort of scratching my head on this film even at this point, but I can say that these actors maintain our interest as pushing themselves out of their comfort zone, and I think that is a reason good enough for watching this rather frustratingly ambiguous drama with many unanswered questions hovering around its corners even in the end.

small_Foxcatcher06

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Nightcrawler (2014) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4) : The Secret of His Twisted Success

K72A5164.CR2 “Nightcrawler” is both chilling and fascinating in its sardonic observation of its very unlikable hero who is disturbingly singled-minded in his ruthless pursuit of success. When he happens to come across a possible way for success, he instantly sets himself for whatever will be done in the name of success, and it is very disturbing to watch how he gets away with all these nasty and manipulative tactics of his – and how others around him willingly let them tempted, manipulated, and exploited by him for whatever they need from him.

When we meet Louis Bloom (Jake Gyllenhaal who looks quite gaunt and creepy in his leaner appearance) during the opening scene, this young crook is in the middle of his usual small-time criminal activity during one night, and this scene exemplifies well how amoral and opportunistic he is. When he happens to be confronted by a security guard, Bloom tries to talk his way out of this situation at first, but then, right after he notices a fancy wristwatch on the guard’s left wrist, he chooses to knock him out and snatch that wristwatch instead while not forgetting his original target.

Although his latest criminal activity does not pay much in the end, Bloom comes across a car crash site on the road while returning to his home, and he notices a freelance film crew shooting a rescue job. There are many freelancers who usually roam around the city during many nights while searching for any good accident sites or crime scenes to be shot, and they usually sell these video clips to local TV news stations, which are always ready to buy anything sensational enough to be broadcast for their news programs.

nightcrawler-2014Once he sees that he can give a shot in this underground field, Bloom prepares his business plan step by step. He gets a camcorder along with a radio scanner through stealing an expensive bicycle from someone, and then he starts to look for any possible chance for his breakthrough. The cinematographer Robert Elswit, who won an Oscar for his superlative cinematography in Paul Thomas Anderson’s “There will be Blood” (2007), fills the night scenes with the cold, stark ambiance of night streets which took me back to Michael Mann’s “Collateral” (2004), and Bloom sometimes looks more like a hyena or coyote as driving his shabby Toyota vehicle around various areas of LA.

And then he finally gets the moment he desires. Although he is not so skilled during his first attempt to capture the fine details of a crime scene on his camcorder, he accomplishes the mission anyway, and he gives his first video footage to Nina Romina (Rene Russo), a struggling director of some local TV morning news program. Although the quality of his video clip is not that good enough to affect the rating of her news program, it is fairly good enough to be shown on TV, and Romina sees a good possibility from Bloom; she encourages him while paying him enough for what he delivered, and that is the beginning of their business relationship.

Bloom turns out to be a quick learner as he says, and he takes more forward steps as further improving his visual skills. Through his earned money, he buys a red sports car for arriving at the sites faster than not only his competitors including Joe Loder (Bill Paxton) but also policemen and paramedics, and he also gets himself equipped with better video tools. In addition, he hires Rick (Riz Ahmed), a young desperate guy who accepts Bloom’s tempting offer and then begins to work as his assistant/intern just because he needs money right now.

Determined to be the top of his business field, Bloom never hesitates whenever he smells something which may interest Romina and her TV station. In case of one crime scene, he slips into the house while noticed by no one around the scene, and he even alters several things in the house just for having a more effective moment to be captured on his camera – and that is just the beginning of his many morally and ethnically questionable behaviors we are going to witness.

nightcrawler-438693lRomina is not oblivious to what this ambitious freelancer does for delivering what he promises to her, but, as reflected in Sidney Lumet’s great film “Network” (1976), rating is everything for her and others in her field. They are always in the constant need of drawing viewers’ attention every day, and something to be accompanied with that familiar phrase “viewer discretion advised” is a sure thing to guarantee higher rating. Whenever they give ‘graphic’ sights to shock and grab their viewers’ eyes, their viewers want more to come, and we all have seen such a toxic cycle in our reality. Violence and crime are always ready to be sensationalized and amplified on the media as we desire, and we gladly go along with that while hypocritically blaming whatever comes handy to us.

The director Dan Gilory’s biting screenplay eventually goes into the area of a cold, morbid satire when Bloom comes across what may be the mother lode of his burgeoning professional career. As recording almost everything in the aftermath of some horrible crime before the police arrive, he also gets a far bigger opportunity which he cannot possibly ignore. While withholding the crucial information from the cops investigating the case, Bloom orchestrates a plan for shooting another sensational moment to excite millions of viewers around the city, and we get a fiendishly clever scene as he carefully prepares for whatever will be soon captured by his cameras. There are innocent people on the scene who may get hurt or killed because of his wily manipulation, but they are more or less than incidental extras in his view, and his sociopathic detachment feels far more nefarious than before as he reveals more of his true nature in his unnerving calmness.

Bloom is indeed quite a loathsome guy, and Jake Gyllenhaal, who also participated in the production of the film, gives an uncompromising performance which never dials down its dark, creepy intensity throughout the film. We dislike Bloom more as the movie looks closer at his dark sides through its cold, clinical approach, but we cannot help but be fascinated with how far he can go for his insidious purposes, and Gyllenhaal never steps back from the heart of darkness inside his character. This is a lying thief who feels no qualms about exploiting everyone around him, and there is a darkly humorous moment when he comes across a vehicle accident of some other freelancer guy. Bloom knows that guy, but that guy is merely another news material to be shot and sold now, and Bloom’s amoral ruthlessness especially reminds me of Tom Ripley, Patricia Highsmith’s equally calculating criminal hero.

nightcrawler-2015The supporting characters around Bloom mainly function as our surrogates who are horrified by his sheer amorality even while being drawn deeper and deeper into the realm of his evil influence. Rene Russo is terrific especially during the scenes in which her character faces Bloom’s nastier sides, and she and Gyllenhaal have a very tense moment later in the story as Bloom corners Romina more and more during their private negotiation on his latest video footage. It is clear to both of them (and us) who has the upper hand, and Romina has no choice but to do as he wants – and then she even goes further once she is determined to follow her choice.

On the opposite, Riz Ahmed gains our small sympathy as his clueless character comes to have growing doubts on what he is asked to do for his boss. There eventually comes the moment when he faces his own limits which make him think twice, but Rick still wants money anyway while feeling more disgust, and he eventually finds himself in a very risky situation way over his head as helplessly holding the camera during one sequence which can be described as a cross between “Drive” (2011) and “The French Connection” (1971). Unlike that messy and choppy vehicle action sequence in “Taken 3” (2015), which confused me in every possible way, this sequence firmly holds our attention in its grip even at its most intense shot, and we are always aware of the exact movements on the screen during this terrific moment.

“Nightcrawler” is not a comfortable experience at all, but it is an absorbing character study glimmering its dark territory, and I found myself going back and forth between horror and fascination while also being amused by its satiric view on media sensationalism. Its story is essentially a deranged success drama pushed to extremes, and it is downright fearful to imagine what else its dangerous hero is capable of as climbing up and up along the ladder of success with his utter disregard of morals and ethics.

At one point, Bloom says “A friend is a gift you give yourself.” When you see where he eventually arrives in the end, you will probably think again of what he meant in his words. This guy serves no one but himself, and he needs others only when he need to use them – and no one can stop him once his eyes are set on something. When the movie is over, some of you may be relieved that you have never come across such a guy like him in your life.

nightcrawler02

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Predestination (2014) ☆☆☆(3/4) : That tricky paradox of time travel

small_Predestination  “Predestination” is a minor surprise to be admired for its clever handling of one classic science fiction idea which always intrigues us for that mind-boggling paradox inside it. You will certainly see through almost every cog inside its plot during its first 10 minutes, but the movie finds a smart way to intrigue and engage you as going through expected plot points, and that is where most of its fun comes from. Therefore, I sincerely recommend you at this point that you should watch this compelling science fiction film right now for your maximum entertainment rather than reading this review, which can unintentionally ruin your viewing experience.

I have not read Robert A. Heinlein’s short story “All You Zombies” which the movie is based on, but I read other science fiction works based on similar premises, so the setting of the movie came to me with amused recognition during my viewing. While initially looking like the 20th century as we know, the world depicted in the film has a different historical timeline as a sort of parallel universe to ours, and we recognize a number of notable differences here and there in the background. Technology is more advanced here as shown in the scenes set in the 1960-70s, and they even invent time travel technology later around the 1980s.

Around that point, a mysterious government agency named the Temporal Bureau is established, and the main function of this secret agency is regulate the timeline in past and future. While preventing some bad incidents in the past (the movie is rather vague about how the agency knows that its missions are accomplished, by the way), it also puts lots of efforts to the maintenance of the timeline, and that is why it demands high degrees of integrity and discretion to its small number of special time-traveling agents.

small_Predestination03 At the beginning, we see one of those time-traveling agents going somewhere for the latest mission along with a time traveling device, which looks like a guitar case on the surface. The purpose of the mission is stopping and killing a very dangerous bomber nicknamed Fizzle Bomber, and this unidentified bomber somehow manages to keep evading the pursuit of the Temporal Bureau while terrorizing the citizens of New York during the 1970s through the series of massive bombing incidents which caused the death of many people.

The agent in question fails to catch Fizzle Bomber on the spot, but he manages to prevent the bomb explosion although he gets severely burned during his attempt to defuse the bomb. After returning to the headquarters, he goes through an extensive plastic surgery on his face and body, and, though he feels awkward about his newly constructed face when he looks at the mirror, he soon becomes ready for a new mission, which will probably be his last mission before his imminent retirement.

The agent goes back to New York in the 1970s where Fizzle Bomber continues to scare New Yorkers, and we see him working as a barkeep at some shabby bar somewhere in the city. While we are not exactly sure about the nature of his mission, he happens to serve some bitter customer during one night. We are told that this customer has earned some money through cheap confession stories of ‘an unmarried mother’ for Readers’ digest, and it seems this customer has one hell of real story which has not been told to anyone yet.

I will not go into details on what will be told next, but let’s say that it is the story of one woman who went through the series of ups and downs throughout her sad, messy life. The directors Michael Spierig and Peter Spierig, who previously made a flawed but interesting vampire movie “Daybreakers” (2009), did a good job of setting distinctive period moods for each temporal point along their increasingly complicated plot, and the result is compelling while also quite poignant sometimes as the plot gets thickened with more things to be told or revealed. As we see more of the woman in question, we come to feel sad about her frustrating struggle in the world which seems to have its own plan for her, and then those usual questions associated time travel stories accordingly follow: Is it everything determined from the beginning? Is it possible to change past or future? Is free will nothing but an illusion?

small_Predestination04 The movie basically revolves around a handful of characters, and its main actors find interesting things to do with their seemingly functional characters. Their performances keep the plot rolling even when it becomes quite shaky along with accumulating paradoxes to amuse and confuse you, and the Spierig brothers push it further with confidence as it is approaching to its inevitable point which will reveal something not so far from those cerebral ironies we observed from many other science fiction films about time travel.

Ethan Hawke, who previously collaborated with the Spierig brothers in “Daybreakers”, sets the tone well at the beginning, and he also brings a considerable amount of low-key intensity to his bar scenes as we come to sense something going on beneath these scenes. While only appearing from time to time, Noah Taylor is also effective as the shady head of the Temporal Bureau; the more we meet him, the more we senses that this guy may be the only one seeing the whole picture above everything. The performance by Sarah Snook, who surely deserves more attention and more good opportunities in the future, is the wild card of the film; she is simply marvelous as gradually taking the center as a precious beating heart of the story, and what this talented actress achieves on the screen is something you have to behold for yourself.

Science fiction films driven by ideas have been rather rare in these days, and it is really nice to watch a fun, intelligent science fiction film like “Predestination”. It is sometime pretty predictable as you can clearly see the cards held behind its back, but then it amazes you as shuffling them to generate more entertainment than expected, and you may want to watch it again as reflecting on that ever-interesting time travel paradox.

small_Predestination02

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Pride (2014) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4) : Together they stood

pride02 “Pride” is a crowd-pleasing comedy film inspired by a real-life story of one unlikely alliance between two social groups who could not possibly be more different from each other. There seemed to be nothing common between these two groups at all while they were mostly separated by prejudices, but, as one supported the other, the gap between them became narrower than before, and they eventually stood together for each other as depicted in the film.

The year is 1984, and it was the time when British miners went through a long strike against Margaret Thatcher and her drastic labor policy which threatened their living at that time. Constantly cornered and pressured by the British government, the miners on the strike received some supports at least during those difficult days, and one of their notable supporters was, surprise, the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) community in UK.

The idea of the LGBT community supporting miners comes from Mark Ashton (Ben Shcnetzer), a young, passionate gay rights activist who sees one possibility for promoting their social agenda during the 1984 Lesbian and Gay Pride March held in London. After noticing that people pay more attention when he and others try to collect the money for supporting miners, he suggests to his fellow LGBT community members that they should support the ongoing miners’ strike in public, and he and a number of his close friends soon begin the Lesbians and Gays Support the Miners campaign.

Of course, their support is not received well at first mainly because of common prejudices against them, but then they eventually make a direct contact with the strikers of Onllwyn, a small mining town in Wales. Dai Donovan (Paddy Considine) comes to London to show the gratitude from him and others in Onllwyn, and then Mark and his colleagues are invited to Onllwyn for directly showing their support of miners.

pride05 Not so surprisingly, their arrival is not welcomed by everyone in the town, but they are greeted by several town people including Hefina (Imelda Staunton), Siân (Jessica Gunning), and Cliff (Bill Nighy, who is unusually more dialed down than before), and it does not take much time for other town people to get a little closer to Mark and his homosexual colleagues as appreciating their big support. While most ladies in the town get along pretty well with their unusual visitors thanks to music and dance, the miners in the town slowly begin to show grudging recognition as getting help from them in more than one ways. When the miners are arrested by the police at one point, they are quickly released thanks to a useful legal tip from Jonathan (Dominic West, who has never been as scene-stealing as this), who knows one or two things about handling the police because of his personal experience. This flamboyant gay guy also gives one hell of dance performance at the town hall which dazzles and enthralls almost everyone at the town hall, and a couple of town lads later get a good lesson from him on how to attract women in a sexier way (and it indeed works for them).

Although some town people still look at Mark’s group with disdain and disgust, the bond between Mark’s group and the town people is further solidified through more mutual interactions between them. Hefina and other town ladies are later invited to spend some time in London, and we are confirmed again that ladies know better in case of having a real good fun. As looking around several gay nightclubs, they are certainly surprised by many unusual things they have never encountered before, but they respond to all those sexual sights with good humor anyway, and we get a small amusing moment when two ladies ask a very practical question to a bartender in tight leather suit.

pride07 While not pushing the plot too hard, the screenplay by Stephen Beresford sometimes goes into a more serious mood as observing the social difficulties its homosexual characters have to endure just because of their different sexuality. In case of Joe Cooper (George MacKay), this young man has been hiding his homosexuality from his conservative family, but then he begins to come out of the closet step by step as actively working with Mark and other fellow LGBT members for supporting miners. He was initially quite reluctant to show who he is in front of others, but he gradually realizes what he should do for himself, and then there comes an expected moment when he has to make a crucial decision for his life.

The director Matthew Warchus assembled a fabulous cast consisting of various performers who play well with each other in their nice ensemble work. While Imelda Staunton is the most colorful as a feisty middle-aged lady who becomes the strongest defender of Mark’s group, Bill Nighy, Andrew Scott, and Paddy Considine humbly step back for their more colorful co-performers, and Dominic West has a poignant moment which reflects a certain medical problem spread among LGBT people during the 1980s. Although they are less well-known compared to the actors mentioned above, the younger actors in the film including Ben Schnetzer, and George MacKay fill their characters with enough youthful energy as required, and Jessica Gunning is notable as a young town housewife who becomes far more politically active than before through her experience with the strike as well as her special friends.

As some of you may know, the British miners’ strike was ultimately ended with bitter notes in 1985, but the final scene of “Pride” powerfully reminds us of what was gained in spite of that defeat, and that moving moment will probably make you think a lot about that valuable solidarity among the weak, which is still a relevant matter in these days as before. It is always touching to watch a genuine act of human decency in movies, and “Pride”, which won the Queer Palm award at the Cannes Film Festival in last year, is surely a very good case of that while being a wonderful movie packed with lots of human comedy and drama to be appreciated by any audiences.

pride06

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Paddington (2014) ☆☆☆(3/4) : A furry, cuddly family movie

paddington01  To be frank with you, I am not that familiar with Paddington Bear, which has been a very popular British character since he was created by Michael Bond in 1958. I think I saw him when I visited a Teddy bear museum a few years ago, but I have never read Bond’s books for children, so I did not know much about this famous bear until I watched “Paddington” in this week.

To the audiences like me, “Paddington” surely looks whimsical from the very beginning. The movie has not only talking bears who can speak perfect British English but also several notably unrealistic details I could not help but notice during its first 30 minutes. While nobody seems to notice how weird it is to see a talking bear in the middle of London, he is regarded more like a young foreign guy sent from abroad, and I sort of came to accept that whimsical premise during my viewing although he becomes more like an endangered animal later in the story.

The story begins with the humorous opening sequence presented in old newsreel style. Once upon a time, an adventurer named Montgomery Clyde (Tim Downie) ventured into the tropical forest of Darkest Peru (it is actually Costa Rica, by the way), and he eventually encountered a bear couple living in the forest. While giving them a Basic English lesson and the first taste of marmalade, Clyde quickly befriended them, and, as going back to England several days later, he promised that he would gladly welcome them if they ever have a chance to visit London.

More than 40 years have passed now, and that bear couple in question becomes too old for travel, but they are still dreaming about going to London while taking care of their young nephew. After having that sweet taste of marmalade through their old friend Clyde, Pastuzo (voiced by Michael Gambon) and Lucy (voiced by Imelda Staunton) have made marmalade from the oranges grown in their forest, and we get a fun sight of how they harvest those juicy oranges and then slice and boil them to produce their favourite source of nutrition full of carbohydrates and vitamins.

paddington02  Pastuzo and Lucy and their nephew have been happy together for years in their cozy home on a big tree, but their happiness is soon shattered when a sudden earthquake shakes the whole forest. Pastuzo is killed during the earthquake, and Lucy says a goodbye to her dear nephew as sending him to London and then going to the Home for Retired Bears (I guess there must be other talking bears in Darkest Peru although they do not appear in the film at all).

After spending several days on a cargo ship as a stowaway, our young bear hero, voiced by Ben Whishaw, soon finds himself at the Paddington station right after the ship arrives in London. Although he can speak English well thanks to a Basic English lesson record left by Clyde, there is no one he knows in London, and he feels disoriented and isolated as being neglected by Londoners who do not pay much attention to him.

And then he comes across the Browns when they have just arrived at the station. Mr. Brown (Hugh Bonnevile) is not very willing to take care of a bear he has never met before, but Mrs. Brown (Sally Hawkins) sincerely wants to help him, and their children, Judy (Madeleine Harris) and Jonathan (Samuel Joslin), do not mind taking a talking bear to their home on 32 Windsor Garden.

Because his name in Bear language is rather hard to pronounce, he is called Paddington instead for an apparent reason, and Paddington begins his first days in London as temporarily staying at the Browns’ house whose interior design is as colorful and eccentric as those offbeat films by Wes Anderson. While Mr. Brown is as fastidious as your typical risk evaluator, Mrs. Brown is currently working on her latest graphic novel project, and Judy and Jonathan are smart kids with each own intellectual interests as reflected by their respective room environments. Their house is maintained by ever-reliable Mrs. Bird (Julie Walters), and then we also meet Mr. Curry (Peter Capaldi), a cranky neighbour who is not that pleased about Paddington’s stay on the next door.

paddington06  The rest of the movie revolves around Paddington’s series of misadventures while he tries to locate the address of his uncle and aunt’s old friend with some help from Mrs. Brown. Although he does not mean any harm, Paddington is often as disastrously clumsy as Inspector Clouseau, so we get a funny moment at the bathroom which is probably inspired by that memorable climax scene from Jean-Pierre Jeunet and Marc Caro’s “Delicatessen” (1991), and then there is a big slapstick sequence on the streets initiated by Paddington’s innocent misunderstanding. Thanks to Paddington, Mr. Brown unexpectedly finds himself going through adventures he has never imagined for years, and he even comes to try something new for him during one sequence clearly influenced by Terry Gilliam’s “Brazil” (1985).

Meanwhile, there is someone who wants to catch Paddington. Millicent (Nicole Kidman), a foxy taxidermist of the Natural History Museum, cannot be possibly more excited to learn that a special bear she has desired to stuff for years is now in London, and she becomes quite determined to attain her goal by any means necessary. While Millicent is not as memorably diabolical as Cruella de Vil, Nicole Kidman has a fun with her mean character, and she willingly puts herself into silliness as her character eagerly preying on Paddington.

The director Paul King, who wrote the screenplay with Hamish McColl, keeps the mood lightweight even during a rather dark climax unfolded at the Natural History museum, and his actors including Hugh Bonneville, Sally Hawkins, Julie Walters, Peter Capaldi, and Jim Broadbent convincingly inhabit inside the fantasy version of London as bringing some human touches to their broad characters. Although he looks different from the original version, Paddington is an endearing CGI character on the screen despite that difference, and Ben Whishaw conveys well his character’s gentle, courteous nature in his voice performance. It took some time for me to get used to its whimsical aspects, but I enjoyed “Paddington” in the end for its charming mood and fun moments, and I certainly find its furry hero cuddlier than before.

paddington05

 

 

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Unbroken (2014) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4) : An old-fashioned biopic for Oscar season

unbroken01  It goes without saying that Louis Zamperini, the hero of “Unbroken”, had an interesting life worthwhile to be told. While he initially drew lots of attention as a young promising Olympic distant runner through his athletic talent, he served in the US Air Force during the World War II, and then he went through long, difficult ordeals after his bomber plane crashed in the middle of the Pacific Oceans. Despite all those torments forced upon him after he was captured by the Japanese army, he survived in the end through his resilience, and he also found a way to be in peace with his dark memories while becoming an inspiring figure during his later years.

Sadly, though it is made with lots of sincerity and respect, “Unbroken” feels bland and superficial in its supposedly epic scope. While there are good moments to be admired for the efforts and skills put into them, we rarely get the sense of a man at its center while it plods along the crucial incidents in his life, and many moments of suffering he endures in the film somehow never feel that close to us while we are reminded again and again of how indomitable his spirit is.

At the beginning, the story goes back and force between Zamperini’s early years during 1920-30s and his military service years during the World War II. During the opening sequence, Zamperini (Jack O’Connell) and the other crew members of his bomber plane are in the middle of their latest mission, and this sequence is skillfully handled to generate visceral feelings which instantly put us into their risky situation full of possible dangers. They succeed in bombarding their target, but then they have to engage Japanese fighters, and the possibility of death is palpable to everyone on the plane.

While following their struggle during the mission, the movie occasionally flashbacks to Zamperini’s early years. When he was a kid, Zamperini frequently got himself into troubles, but then his older brother noticed his little brother’s natural potential as a runner, and Zamperini began his training under his brother’s constant support and coaching. After winning the national championship several years later, he immediately prepares himself for the next level, and we soon see him in the middle of the 1936 Berlin Olympic. Although Zamperini did not finish first during his 5,000-meter race, his remarkable running speed during the last lap drew the media’s attention, and he even personally met Adolf Hitler after the race (that small interesting fact is omitted in the movie, by the way).

unbroken03 Although his hope for another chance to win four years later is dashed because of the World War II, Zamperini never gives up even when he is doing his military service in the Pacific Ocean. After surviving another dangerous mission along with his comrades, he goes through his training session as usual, and he looks as hopeful as ever while focused on his running.

However, his bomber crashes to the ocean during one small mission, and he and two surviving crew members have to struggle for more than 40 days while depending on their two lifeboats and a few other things to support them. Their struggle with many dangers and obstacles including the lack of fresh water is depicted effectively on the screen, and O’Connell and his two co-actors are convincing as their characters are slowly deteriorated by hunger and dehydration under their despairing condition.

After one of them dies, Zamperini and the other guy are later captured by the Japanese Army. They are sent to Tokyo after suffering a number of harsh treatments, and then there are more harsh treatments awaiting for them. Right from his first day at a prisoner-of-war camp near Tokyo, Zamperini draws the attention of Corporal Watanabe (Miyavi), and this sadistic hateful guy, who is nicknamed ‘the Bird’ by his prisoners, is determined to abuse him in every possible way.

The rest of the film depicts the series of torturous moments Zamperini has to endure due to Watanabe and other Japanese soldiers, and that is where the story becomes less powerful and interesting than before. While there are indeed terrible moments such as when Watanabe forces all of his prisoners to punch Zamperini in the face one by one as another sadistic punishment, the director Angelina Jolie unfortunately dilutes their emotional power while making these scenes look apparently staged and polished. As looking at Zamperini and other prisoners, I was more aware of how carefully their ‘grimy’ clothes were prepared along with their makeups before shooting, and I also noticed how the great cinematographer Roger Deakin’s first-rate work on the screen draws more attention to all those good-looking shots rather than people inside them. When Zamperini is collapsed during one scene, the camera looks away from him to capture Watanabe’s domineering presence in the twilight, and you can clearly see how problematic its execution is even when you admire the splendid visual work on the screen.

unbroken02

“Unbroken” is based on Laura Hillenbrand’s non-fiction book “Unbroken: A World War II Story of Survival, Resilience, and Redemption”. I heard from others that the book is a very vivid account of Zamperini’s life, but the adapted screenplay written by Richard LaGravenese, William Nicholson, and Joel and Ethan Coen is tame and artificial in many aspects, and, considering several corny moments in the film, I wonder about how much the Coen brothers really participated in the writing process. While the story feels dragged and monotonous especially during the last act of Zamperini’s ordeal, the ending feels shallow without much emotional impact to touch us, and that looks all the more ironic considering how Zamperini used to surprise people during his races.

This is the second feature film directed by Angelina Jolie, and she shows here that she is a competent director with skills to be honed further. There is nothing seriously wrong with her film on the technical level, but she does not succeed in presenting human interests to engage us, and her movie feels more like an old-fashioned biography film made for Oscar season as a result. She surely made this film for honoring her subject, but I think she had a little too much respect while making it.

I am disappointed with “Unbroken” on the whole, but I appreciate its good elements which certainly deserve better than this. Jack O’Connell, who was quite good in “Starred Up” (2013) and “’71” (2014), and his co-star Domhnall Gleeson did everything they could do with their respective roles, and I expect that the movie will get several Oscar nominations in technical categories. It does present sufferings on the screen, but, alas, I do not see much of a man below them.

unbroken05

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Drop (2014) ☆☆☆(3/4) : A quiet man behind the bar

thedrop02 The hero of “The Drop” is a quiet, reticent guy who does not draw others’ attention a lot as silently going through his mundane daily life. He is usually nice and generous to his customers, and he looks like a guy we may come to like as spending some time with him, but then we notice more of his curiously reserved attitude, which gradually intrigues us as he faces a couple of troubles he must deal with.

Through the opening narration, Bob Saginowski (Tom Hardy) tells us about how the illegal transaction of local mobsters’ money is done within his working-class neighbourhood in New York. Local mobsters randomly select one of the bars in the neighborhood whenever they need to gather the income from their criminal operations while avoiding the police, and there is always a secret safe in these bars in which bar owners keep a bunch of cash envelopes delivered to them one by one until someone comes to get all of them later.

With his cousin Marv (James Gandolfini), Bob has managed Marv’s bar which is virtually owned by Chechen mobsters. Although there was a time when Marv and Bob had successful days with their small-time criminal career, they were eventually pushed by new forces coming into their neighborhood, and now they have to be content with being allowed to run their bar as occasionally keeping the money for Chechen mobsters if their bar happens to be selected as ‘the drop’.

thedrop01 When two armed guys wearing masks break into the bar around the end of their working hour during one night, Marv and Bob have no choice but to give not only their money but also the money delivered during that day, and both of them see a big problem to come after that robbery. Chechen mobsters are not going to let the robbers get away with stealing their money, and Marv and Bob are well aware of that they can be killed or harmed by these gangs even if they prove to be innocent in the end. There is a short but chilling moment when Chovka (Michael Aronov) and his Chenchen gangs drop by their bar, and Chovka gives them a clear (and bloody) warning on what can possibly happen if someone dares to mess with his organization.

In case of Detective Torres (John Ortiz), he quickly detects the connection between Marv’s bar and Chechen mobsters, but he is wise enough not to waste his time on Marv or Bob although he becomes a little more curious about Bob as a fellow parishioner who have seen Bob at a local Catholic church. We frequently see Bob attending the church services, but his face always looks distant, and he has never participated in communions for some reason. He lives alone in his house, and he does not have anyone to talk with besides Marv while seeming to be all right with his solitude which has probably been continued for years.

But then Bob happens to meet a woman named Nadia (Noomi Rapace) through one small incident. During one evening, he discovers an injured puppy dog within a trash can in the front yard of Nadia’s house, and, as taking care of that dog with some help from Nadia, Bob becomes close to this woman who once had a rough time due to drug addiction but has tried hard to rebuild her life as working as a waitress.

thedrop03 With Nadia and the dog which is named Rocco by him, Bob’s lonely life becomes a little brighter than before, but there is still a problem with Cheche mobsters, and then he also encounters Eric Deeds (Matthias Schoenaerts), Nadia’s aggressive ex-boyfriend who is also Rocco’s original owner. He demands Bob money in exchange for his dog, and, considering his notoriety around the neighbourhood, he surely looks like someone who will not go away until he gets what he wants.

The movie is directed by Michaël R. Roskam, a Belgian filmmaker who previously made a debut with Oscar-nominated film “Bullhead” (2011). While it is shaky as a crime drama at times, that film works as a dark, compelling character study, and it was also a career breakthrough for both Roskam and his lead actor Schoenaerts, who was utterly unforgettable as its fascinating hero who is driven to bulk up his body by any means necessary as his own miserable way of running away from an old wound in the past.

With the screenplay by Dennis Lehane, who adapted his short story “Animal Rescue” (He later expanded it to the novel which was published around the time when the movie was released in last year), Roskam made a smooth transition to English-language film. Its narrative is slow, but the movie steadily holds our interest under his leisurely but assured direction, and Roskam patiently builds low-key tension below the screen as we gather that the story is being moved slowly toward some inevitable point waiting for its characters.

thedrop04 Roskam also has a group of talented actors who can suggest more than what is said on the screen through their nuanced performances. While holding himself well in a very understated mode throughout the movie, Tom Hardy is engaging to watch even when his character does not reveal a lot about himself, and he is supported well by the other good performers who ably tune their performances to the somber atmosphere surrounding their characters. James Gandolfini, who died in 2013 not long after finishing his work in this film, has a sad scene when Marv expresses his frustration with life during his private conversation with Bob, and Noomi Rapace provides small warm spots in the film as her character and Hardy’s character tentatively come closer to each other. The movie also pays attentions to some of its minor supporting characters, and a brief scene between Gandolfini and Ann Dowd, who plays Marv’s sister, tells many things about their close relationship which makes them look more like husband and wife rather than siblings.

While it requires some patience due its slow pace, “The Drop” is a solid crime film worthwhile to watch for good performances and competent direction. You can easily guess where it is going even before it begins to prepare itself for the finale, but it is interesting to watch how it progresses to that point through characters and several nice subtle touches to reflect on later, and you will probably appreciate a small glimmer of hope at the end of this melancholic character drama.

thedrop07

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

‘71 (2014) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4) : A gripping tale of survival in the midst of the Troubles

7101 “‘71” is a gripping tale of survival with a number of very intense moments which made my body tightened during my viewing. Pumped by its confident direction and fueled by its strong lead performance, the movie never loses its tight grip on the audiences once it hurls its young hero into a perilous situation in the midst of the Northern Ireland Conflict during the 1970s, and it gives us as a grim, vivid look into a turbulent era in the past which still casts a long grey shadow on Northern Ireland even at this point.

Before he is sent to Belfast along with his fellow soldiers of the British Army, Gary Hook (Jack O’Connell) looks as confident as expected from a young soldier during the final days of military training. The opening scene, which begins with the vibrant sounds of boxing gloves, shows him in a tough boxing match with the other trainee, and then we see him going through various training courses along with others. Not many things are told about his personal life, but there is a brief moment when he visits his young brother who is currently under foster care, and we can only guess that they grew up together without their parents.

Not long after Gary and others arrive at their barrack, they are put into their first mission in Belfast, and a short briefing on their mission gives us some basic background information on the ongoing situation in the city which is virtually turned into a war zone because of the continuing conflict between the Protestant groups and the Catholic groups. As reflected by a map shown during the briefing scene, this conflict, which is called the Troubles, divided Belfast and its people into fragments during the 1970s, and this conflict ravaged Northern Ireland for nearly 30 years until it was officially ended in 1998.

In their first mission, all Gary and others have to do is protecting the police officers who are about to go into a house in the Catholic area and arrest someone in the house, but the soldiers and their commander Lieutenant Armitage (Sam Reid) soon realize that they are in a difficult situation way over their head. Right after they arrive at the site, the news of their arrival is quickly spread around the neighbourhood through trashcan lids repeatedly hit on the pavement, and the resulting noise begins to sound more like ominous war drum as more people are gathering around the site – and they are certainly not so pleased about what is going on in their territory.

7103 The soldiers are ordered not to provoke local people, but the protesters becomes more aggressive as the soldiers try to block and stop them, and some of them soon throw stones at the soldiers as the situation is getting more chaotic than before. The sense of urgency is palpable as the cinematographer Tat Radcliffe’s handheld camera frantically looks around police officers, soldiers, and protesters, and the sheer verisimilitude of this sequence makes us feel helpless and cornered as if we were right in the middle of the chaos along with them.

And then Gary and one of his comrades get themselves separated from others when they are ordered to retrieve a snatched rifle. After they happen to be left alone by mistake, the other soldier is shot to death by a member of local Catholic paramilitary group, and Gary must run for his life as desperately trying to evade the following pursuit. This sequence can feel quite dizzy to some of you mainly due to its shaky handheld camerawork and staccato-like editing, but it is skillfully done as generating its own rapid, pulsating rhythm to follow, and the overall result is absolutely breathtaking to say the least.

Gary manages to save himself, but he is still in a very unsafe zone, and his circumstance becomes more dangerous as the night begins. He fortunately comes across a number of people who can help him, but most people in the city is connected with one side or the other side, and the guys who chased after Gary at that time still want to kill him even though their superior does not want that happen at all.

The screenplay by Gregory Burke sometimes becomes a little more relaxed as giving some spaces to the other substantial supporting characters including Captain Sandy Browning (Sean Harris), a hard-bitten cop who looks mean and ruthless right from his first appearance. This unlikable guy, who even has more authority than Lieutenant Armitage, can pull some strings on both sides through his covert connections, so there is indeed a chance for Gary’s survival, but the situation becomes more unpredictable through several plot turns as we come to see a growing possibility that Gary may not see his little brother again.

'71 film still This is the first feature film of the director Yann Demange, and he did a superlative job in transporting us to the period background of his movie. While the movie was shot in the locations in Northern England, its gray mood of socio-political unrest feels real and authentic with those rubbles and burned (or burning) vehicles on the streets, and Demange also adds a couple of stylish touches to the night scenes for emphasizing the nightmarish aspect of his hero’s plight. There is a very striking sequence in the middle of film you have to see for yourself, and this sequence almost becomes surreal as Gary wanders around the confusing aftermath of what he has just barely escaped – and we are reminded that how terrible that violent time was to many people regardless of which side they were on.

The success of the movie depends a lot on its lead actor Jack O’Connell, and he gives an electrifying physical performance to be praised along with his equally remarkable turn in “Starred Up” (2013), in which he memorably plays a young troublemaking prisoner with hair-trigger temper. He is believable here in this film as an ordinary young man struggling to survive under a very daunting circumstance which tests every fiber of his resilience, and his performance is captivating to watch especially when his character is pushed further into his grueling ordeal during the heart-stopping climax of the film. While it can be said that the movie belongs to O’Connell, Sean Harris and the other supporting performers in the film are also good in their respective roles, and they all look convincing as the people who have lived with danger in every day of their daily life.

While its view on the Northern Ireland Conflict is inherently limited, “’71” strikes us with its raw realism and suspense through its direct, focused approach instead. This is a powerful drama which deserves to be mentioned along with the other notable films about the Northern Ireland Conflict, and it also works as a taut, thrilling cinematic piece which frequently overwhelmed me with its nail-biting highlights. In the other words, I had one of the most suspenseful experiences to remember in this year.

7104

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Falcon Rising (2014) ☆☆☆(3/4) : It’s a solid start for whatever will come next

Falcon-Rising-2 “Falcon Rising” is as much as you can expect from a B-action flick featuring a lonely tough guy hero and a bunch of bad guys guaranteed to get his vengeful wrath in the end. This is indeed a very familiar type of action film as reflected by its fairly simple plot and broad characterization, but it is a well-made film with some style and skills, and it comes to me as something more engaging than many average blockbuster action films.

When we meet John Chapman (Michael Jai White) at the beginning, he is in his shabby apartment somewhere in New York while going through his usual sullen, depressing mode. Suffering from the post-traumatic stress disorder fueled by the memories of violence and death during his military years, he spends most of his time with drinking, but that does not ease his pain much, and we see him attempting Russian roulette with a ritualistic attitude which suggests that this may be not his first attempt.

At least, there is one single light in his barren daily life, and that comes from his sister Cindy (Lalia Ali), who has been working as a volunteer worker in a slum area of Rio de Janeiro. When she makes a visit to her brother on one day, Chapman shows his nicer sides while looking like a big awkward child in front of his sister, and his mood becomes brightened a bit as he spends a brief time with Cindy.

Not long after Cindy returns to Rio de Janeiro, her unconscious body covered with bruise and blood is found in the slum area, and the local cops notify this horrible incident to Manny Ridley (Neal McDonough), an American government official who also happens to be Chapman’s old military buddy. As soon as recognizing Cindy from her photo, Ridley sends a message to his friend, and Chapman quickly flies over to Rio de Janeiro to see his sister at a local hospital. While waiting for his sister to regain her consciousness, Chapman becomes determined to find out who is behind Cindy’s misery, and Ridley knows too well that he must assist his friend as much as he can.

falconrising02 As Chapman pokes around the slum area where his sister has worked with lots of dedication, the movie establishes the vivid sense of locations through the realistic sights around a neglected society where its poor people mostly depend on gangsters who give them more help and assistant than the incompetent government. The people in this shabby area, which is called favela, usually trust their neighborhood gangsters more than the police, and Katarina (Millie Ruperto), a young police officer who sincerely wants to help them, has tried hard to get their trust through her good will.

However, Thiago (Jimmy Navarro), a local detective eager to get any good chance to get rid of criminals in his area, prefers a more brutal tactic, and he certainly does not approve of Katrina’s soft approach. He also shows a troubling obsession with his duty especially when he is allowed to sweep the area with his task force team later in the story, and we come to sense there is something personal about his obsession.

Meanwhile, Chapman gathers the clues step by step, and it is gradually revealed that his sister became a target to be eliminated as she was digging into the questionable missing cases of young girls in the neighborhood, who were assumed to be dead after they suddenly disappeared. Whoever was not very pleased with her investigation, it becomes clear to Chapman that his sister is still in danger, and that motivates him more as his mind and body are returning to his old combative mode.

Falcon-Rising-4 While there is not much surprise when the main villain character and his gangs enter the scene during its later part, “Falcon Rising” serves us with several physical action scenes as Chapman goes deeper into a powerful and ruthless crime organization, and the director Ernie Barbarash expertly handles these scenes with kinetic excitement to appreciate. During my recent viewing of “Taken 3” (2015), I was constantly distracted by its choppy editing and shaky handheld camera work with no clear sense of action, but the action scenes in “Falcon Rising” feel smooth and fluid as letting us get involved in the movements on the screen, and it surely helps that the actors really threw themselves into these scenes.

Supplying his dark, troubled character with enough amount of brooding gravitas, Michael Jai White, whom I fondly remember for his comic performance in “Black Dynamite” (2009), certainly looks fit enough to take care of all the bad guys in the film. As a skilled martial artist, he looks both convincing and effortless with other actors during his action scenes, and we get a number of exciting moments such as when his character has to depend on his body (and a suitcase) to fight against a group of henchmen. The movie eventually arrives at a typical finale involved with many extras ready to attack Chapman in some warehouse, and this climax sequence culminates to a well-choreographed moment as Chapman has to deal with three different kinds of threats at once.

As implied during its final scene, “Falcon Rising” is intended as the introductory chapter for the planned action franchise, and I heard later that its production company is planning its sequel at present. As an entertaining action movie a bit better than other similar action films, “Falcon Rising” is a solid start for whatever will come next, and you may have some expectation as its self-destructive hero accepts a more product way of living in the end.

falconrising01

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Guest (2014) ☆☆☆(3/4) : Guess who’s coming to their home?

theguest01 Many horror films announce to us in advance that something bad will happen sooner or later, and “The Guest” makes its ominous announcement a little too much. Besides the occasional appearance of moody music, we are served with 1) a mysterious stranger who is super-duper creepy with his utmost courteous manner, 2) plenty of props including those ubiquitous jack-o-lanterns which always remind us of the approaching Halloween Day every 5 or 10 minutes, and 3) a shady supporting character who may tell a bit about the true identity of this creepy stranger in question. This set-up is actually amusing at times, and the movie works as a tense and compelling psychological thriller during its first two acts, but then it becomes less interesting as it switches its mode during the third act involved with lots of violence.

At the beginning, we see a young guy coming into some town, and the guy introduces himself as “David” to Laura Peterson (Sheila Kelley) and her family. Laura and her husband Spencer (Leland Orser) recently lost their son Caleb who died during his military service in Afghanistan, and David (Dan Stevens) says he was one of Caleb’s close friends. It seems he really knew Caleb as shown in one of the photos from Caleb, and Laura welcomes David into her house without any question even though she have never heard about him from her deceased son.

The other family members do not welcome David much at first, but he knows how to ingratiate himself with others, and he smoothly insinuates himself in the household. Spencer is a bit suspicious about David, but then he becomes nicer to David as enjoying several bottles of beer with him, and he even confides to David on the current difficulty at his workplace as if David were his close friend. In case of Caleb’s teenager brother Luke (Brendan Meyer), David approaches to him like a new older brother to lean on, and he begins to gain Luke’s trust especially after he swiftly takes care of the big boys who have been bullying Luke at the school.

theguest03 In contrast, Anna (Maika Monroe), Caleb’s sister, feels something not so right about this mysterious guy who may not tell everything about himself to her and her family, but then she finds herself attracted to him even though she currently has a boyfriend. After all, this is a good-looking guy in nice physical condition to draw any girl’s attention, and Anna’s close friend Kristen (Tabatha Shaun) is certainly impressed a lot by his considerate attitude as well as how he subdues her bothersome ex-boyfriend during an evening party.

Anna’s suspicion is increased more when she happens to know that David does have secrets behind him. It seems David is a fugitive running away from some people, and it looks like these people want to catch him for covering up some secret government project. As soon as Anna’s inquiry is received at the military department, they become ready to track him down, and you can see a very big trouble is approaching to the Petersons.

The director Adam Wingard and the screenplay writer Simon Barrett previously worked together in another horror thriller film “You’re Next” (2011). I did not like that film mainly because of its incoherent plot and superficial characterization, but I appreciated their attempt to play with genre conventions although the result was not as successful as they intended. While it is amusing to watch how a typical situation of home invasion movies is turned upside down in that film, it does not have much substance to support that interesting reversal, and that makes the film less engaging as it approaches to its inevitable conclusion.

theguest02 In case of “The Guest”, Wingard shows a more assured direction in his competent job of setting the mood and background, and he also provides enough substance for maintaining the tension to hold our interest. David’s gradual manipulation of the Petersons has several intriguing dark moments, and his growing relationship with Luke is particular disturbing to watch; he casually suggests violence to Luke as a way to cope with bullying, and Luke does not mind about that at all even when he clearly sees what David is capable of.

As an outsider who may be far more dangerous than he seems on the surface, Dan Stevens gives a chilling performance with sly dark humor, and I especially like one effective scene in which he and Laura come to meet Luke’s school principal after Luke’s violent incident with one of his tormentors at the school. The principle is initially adamant about his decision on how he will punish Luke, but then he is slowly cornered by David step by step as David calmly points out how the situation can turn out to be very disadvantageous to not only the school but also the principle himself. Never raising his voice, Stevens deftly conveys subtle menace behind his seemingly civilized delivery of lines, and, as watching his character getting what he wants in the end of this scene, I was reminded again of why it is sometimes fun to see smart bad guys getting away with many things even when we are disgusted or horrified by their behaviors.

Compared to “You’re Next”, “The Guest” shows considerable improvements, and the filmmakers behind it succeeds in generating more fun to be shared with their audiences. I enjoyed Dan Stevens’ good performance, and the other actors including Maika Monroe and Brendan Meyer are believable in their roles although their characters are basically stock characters to be harmed or scared. It is sort of disappointing that the third act goes on autopilot and then ultimately arrives at a flaccid presentation of a certain horror film cliché associated with countless mad killer movies, but it has its own fair share of dark fun while equipped with the most impressive Halloween school event I have ever seen from recent films, and you may want to rent it someday if you have some free time to spend.

theguest04

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment