Song for Marion (2012) ☆☆☆(3/4) : A familiar song sung well

small_songformarion01You know the song because you have listened to it before. You know how it will be performed because you have encountered it many times before. You know which instrument will be used for playing its certain notes, and you know how sincerely its singers will sing for the big dramatic effect which will certainly tug your heartstrings.

Just in case I sound a bit too cynical to you, I assure you that “Song for Marion” mostly works because it handles its song well despite its familiarity. The ending is already set for its hero right from its first scene and how he arrives at the ending is pretty predictable, but the earnest performances by two reliable actors make the story work, and you can forgive its contrivances and clichés for a while as enjoying its song.

The life of Arthur Harris(Terence Stamp) could have been very lonely if it had not been for his loving wife Marion(Vanessa Redgrave). He is not mean, but this grumpy old man is not particularly friendly with others including his own son James(Christopher Eccleston). His wife has always been the light of his life since their marriage, and his reticent face is brightened a bit whenever he is with her. I’d love to know how they met and then came to love each other during their young days – and how they have managed to maintain their relationship in their cozy household.

Marion has been ill recently, but this lively old lady is cheerful while her husband is very concerned about her health. Although she needs wheelchair to move around outside, she gamely participate in a singing lesson for aging people at the local community center, and she is liked by everyone in the singing lesson including their teacher Elizabeth(Gemma Arterton). While she is joyfully taking the lesson with others, Arthur just waits for her outside the building because he does not have much interest in singing – and getting along with others.

small_songformarion04And then Marion’s illness gets worse than before. Arthur becomes more morose because his beloved wife will soon die, but Marion loses none of her feisty spirit. She keeps attending the singing lesson even though her body becomes weaker, and she even manages to sing “True Colours” wonderfully during the audition for the upcoming choir competition. As we look at his face during her performance, it is apparent that her singing touches Arthur deeply, although he watches her performance silently from the distance and does not say much about it to her.

I guess it will not be much of a spoiler to tell you that Marion eventually passes away during one night. While devastated by the sense of loss, Arthur gradually finds a way to cope with his grief. It turns out that he is a good singer, if not a terrific one, and he prepares for the choir competition along with Elizabeth and his fellow aging students. They look old, but they are still young at their hearts, and there is a small funny moment when one of the members is sent to the hospital after he tries a little too hard while practicing a dance move not recommendable to aging people

The movie becomes more predictable than before as it approaches to the finale which is of course unfolded at the choir competition in question, and it becomes less engaging as it is saddled with a bunch of clichés coming from here and there. No matter how much problematic their circumstance is, you surely know they will be on the stage. No matter how much estranged James is from his father, it goes without saying that he will come to the competition to see his dad. No matter how much reluctant Arthur is on the stage, he is destined to give a moving solo performance for the memory of his wife because he cannot possibly let her down.

small_songformarion02Nevertheless, the movie handles its conventions fairly well with sincerity during most of its running time, and its two lead performers compensate for its shortcomings to some degrees. Terence Stamp and Vanessa Redgrave are well cast as an aging couple who have known and understood each other for many years, and these old veteran performers bring lots of believability to the story. Arthur and Marion sometimes conflict or bicker with each other for trivial things in their daily life, but they always come to agreement, and the affection between them remains same as ever.

While appreciating the quiet chemistry between Stamp and Redgrave on the screen, I could not help but become a little sentimental about their respective careers which started more than 45 years ago. Stamp may look softer and more wrinkled than before, but his sullen face took me back to when I was chilled by his creepy performance in “The Collector”(1965) or when I enjoyed his villainous performance in “Superman”(1978) and “Superman II”(1980). Redgrave is still a graceful actress to watch even though she is over 75 at present, and you can instantly imagine how livelier her character was in the past as you watch her wise face.

“Song for Marion” is a standard sentimental tearjerker, but it is a song sung well to move its audiences none the less, and I saw the audiences reacting positively to its tear-jerking moments. I may be a bit grumpy about the movie as a seasoned moviegoer, but I was engaged thanks to the nice twilight performances by two respectable actors I have been familiar with through many movies, and I think that is a reason good enough for recommendation.

small_songformarion03

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

The Angel’s Share (2012) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4) : A hearty comedy with tough social realism

small_Theangelsshare04Ken Loach’s “The Angel’s Share” is a hearty comedy film served with several whiskey shots of harsh reality. While it ultimately comes to us as a funny and hopeful tale about finding a chance for better life, the movie seldom forgets the grim environment which has influenced its flawed but likable characters. It is humorous as a comedy, but its humor comes with bruises and bleeding nose.

We meet its troublemaker hero through the opening scene where he and others are brought to the court for their respective misdemeanors. Robbie(Paul Brannigan) looks like a harmless man child, but this young hooligan living in Glasgow was arrested for a severe physical assault on one of the local hooligans he has clashed with for years. Because he already has the record of several violent incidents due to his hair-trigger temper, he can be jailed in this time, but, after his lawyer argues that Robbie tries to be a changed man after his girlfriend’s pregnancy, the judge sentences him to 300 hours of community service instead.

When they get out of the court, his girlfriend Leonie(Siobhan Reilly), a young but sensible woman, makes him promise that he will be a good father to their baby and will never get himself into trouble again. Robbie does want to keep the promise, but he finds himself still in conflict with the local hoods. Leonie’s father, who shows no love to him, wants him to go away from his daughter, and so do her thuggish uncles, who beat him to a pulp when he visits the hospital to see Leonie and the baby.

small_Theangelsshare02He sees no prospect in his future for he is virtually unemployable due to his criminal record and little education, and the same thing can be said about the friends he meets through his community service work. Unless something changes their lives, they will be stuck in their dismal world for the rest of their lives while their criminal records will probably become longer than before.

And then a small but considerable change comes to Robbie and his friends. Their community service supervisor Harry(John Henshaw) takes them to a whiskey distillery as the reward for their good behavior, and Robbie becomes very interested in whiskey production. As a tour guide shows them around the distillery, we get some interesting information about the fermentation and distillation process, and we also learn about ‘the angel’s share’, which means a small portion of whiskey evaporating during its long storage period in oak casket.

It turns out that Robbie has a sharp sense which may make him a good connoisseur of whiskey someday. Understanding Robbie’s increasing interest, Harry takes him and others to a whiskey tasting session held by an expert connoisseur in Edinburgh, and they happen to hear from him about a recently discovered casket containing the priceless whiskey from a famous distillery which is no longer in business. It will soon be on the auction, and it is expected to be sold at least at 1 million pound.

small_Theangelsshare06When it becomes clear to Robbie that he cannot find any hope for him and his family in his town, he decides to steal that invaluable whiskey for getting a chance for new life, and that is where the movie moves to a more cheerful mode. It does not look like an easy job at first, but Robbie gets a nice idea for the plan, so we get an amusing sight of him and others wearing kilts as a part of the ludicrous but plausible disguise during their long journey to the auction place. As the cinematographer Robbie Ryan’s camera captures well the beautiful landscape of the Highlands, the Proclaimers’ song “500 Miles” is played on the soundtrack, and you cannot help but feel cheery about their adventure although what they are going to do is basically a criminal activity which will surely put them in prison if they are caught.

The director Ken Loach, who has constantly made excellent social drama films for more than 40 years, keeps his touches intact in this film which feels more lightweight than his notable works including “Kes”(1969) and “Bread and Roses”(2000). He looks at his characters more warmly than before, and he even does not hesitate to use dirty humor for comic effect during one moment which made my eyeballs rolling, but he does not overlook their gritty reality and their hardships. The story itself may be unrealistic, but it grows out of the realistic background and solid characterization, and we come to like and identify with Robbie and his friends.

Stills taken on the set of The Angels' ShareAs usual, Loach hired a group of unknown actors, and he deftly drew the natural performances from his actors. Paul Brannigan, a young Scottish actor who started his career with this film, gives a likable performance as a problematic lad who knows his problems well but still cannot control himself well. As shown in one striking flashback, Robbie is capable of brutal violence, but he knows he did a wrong thing at that time, and there is an emotionally intense moment when he agonizingly faces its consequence during the private meeting with his victim and the victim’s family. John Henshaw is also excellent as a kind middle-aged man who slowly becomes a mentor figure to Robbie, and Gary Maitland, Jasmin Riggins, and William Ruane give colorful supporting performances as Robbie’s friends/accomplices. Maitland is particularly funny as a dim guy who has somehow managed to live despite his sheer stupidity(or genius, perhaps), and he has several hilarious scenes including the one where he drunkenly staggers around a train station while never being conscious of a possible danger approaching to him.

With the screenplay by his usual collaborator Paul Laverty, Loach successfully made a genuine feel-good movie which is actually not that far from his other more realistic works, and he won the Jury Prize for this film at the Cannes Film Festival in last year. It is a less serious work considering his respectable filmography, but Loach shows that he can have a little fun in his territory without compromise, and the result is a charming comedy on the whole.

small_Theangelsshare01

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

We Have a Pope (2011) ☆☆☆(3/4) : They do have, but….

small_habemuspapam01While I encountered the news about the recent Conclave held in Vatican, my mind automatically went back to “We Have a Pope”, a warm, amusing comedy directed by Nanni Moretti. Because it will be soon released in South Korea in early May, I recently revisited it again for this review, and I came to like it a little more than before as noticing its several flaws again. There are some dissatisfying parts, but the movie has warm comic moments to be enjoyed, and it is immensely helped by the wonderful performance by Michel Piccoli, a French actor who is currently 87 and still active at present.

In the movie, Piccoli plays one of the Conclave members who gather together in Vatican shortly after the death of the Pope. As they follow the rituals before the Conclave, the attention of people and media is focused on them with the increasing curiosity on who will be the next pontiff. Several strong candidates are mentioned on TV, and the faithful in St. Peter’s square are eagerly and patiently waiting for the white smoke which will come out of the chimney on the top of St. Peter’s Basilica once the pope is finally elected.

The Conclave members, who are the cardinals coming from different places all over the world, enter the hall completely secluded from the outside. As each of them secretly decides and writes down a name on the ballot, there is the tension palpably felt among them in silence, but it is not the one you usually expect during election. We closely see their firm, tense faces one by one, and then we listen to each of their nervous minds, which all wish for the same thing: “Not me, oh, Lord! Don’t choose me! I am not worthy!” Being the spiritual/public leader of 1.2 billion Catholics is certainly not an enviable job, and now I wonder whether Pope Francis had a similar wish during the Conclave.

small_habemuspapam03After several rounds of voting, one of them is eventually elected. Cardinal Melville(Michel Piccoli), who was a dark horse candidate during the process, dutifully accepts the result as congratulated by his relieved fellow cardinals, and everything is soon ready for his first public appearance as the new Pope at the front balcony of St. Peter’s Basilica. That famous Latin phrase “Habemus Papam”(It means “We have a Pope”) is spoken as the announcement of his new position, and all he has to do now is appearing in front of the cheering faithful in the square.

However, stressed by his new position and immense duty, he suddenly gets a nervous breakdown. He screams and then bolts out of the place before appearing at the balcony. Surprised and confounded by this unexpected incident, the spokesman of Vatican and the cardinals try to get the situation under control as soon as possible. They check his physical condition, but he seems to be all right. They even bring in a respected psychiatrist(played by Moretti), but the doctor cannot help his latest patient much because of many limits inside Vatican. When he tries to have the first session with the Pope, they are surrounded by the cardinals intent on the questions and answers exchanged between them.

The circumstance becomes more complicated when the Pope manages to disappear after he has a more private session outside Vatican. Everyone in Vatican becomes panic while desperately hiding that fact from the media, and the psychiatrist and the cardinals find themselves stuck in the building, but the Pope himself feels pretty fine as he walks around the streets of Rome as an ordinary man. Because the result of the election is not officially announced, nobody pays attention to him, so he freely wanders around the city and then rediscovers his private enthusiasm through the chance encounter with a theater troupe.

A barbed black comedy could have been made with this funny premise, but the movie instead observes its characters and their human foibles with gentle attitude, and the small moments of amusement are generated from their humanity as a result. While hanging around with the cardinals for a while, the psychiatrist comes to have the conversations with them on several subjects including card game and medications, and he eventually holds a volleyball tournament for them as a means of spending time. It does not continue as long as he hopes, but old cardinals have some fun and excitement while forgetting their emergency during that brief free time.

small_habemuspapam05And Piccoli’s performance holds the story as its heart and soul. Since I saw him for the first time through Alfred Hitchcock’s “Topaz”(1969) in 1996, I have encountered Piccoli in many other movies including Luis Buñuel’s “Belle de Jour”(1967) and Louis Malle’s “Atlantic City”(1980), and it is terrific to see this aging respected actor giving one of his finest performances here in this film. As a confused man struggling with the unwanted duty imposed on him, Piccoli brings humanity and dignity to his character, and there is a poignant moment when his character tries to answer to a question about his occupation during one of his sessions.

When I watched the movie for the first time in late 2011, I was a bit disappointed by the ending and gave it 2.5 stars because of that. The ending could have been a more effective punch line for its comic plot, and I must say I am still not so satisfied with it even after the third viewing because it does not feel that shattering despite what is shown on the screen.

Nevertheless, Piccoli’s performance remains as something worthwhile to watch, and the good moments in the film grow on me while entertaining me with their good-natured humor and gentle warmth, and I guess my initial judgment was caused by my wrong expectation(I sort of expected the Vatican version of “Analyze This”(1999) before watching it, to be frank with you). It is not bitingly funny at all, but that is not what this mild comedy intends to be, and it does most of its jobs well.

small_habemuspapam04

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

The avian campus gangs on cloudy day (2013/04/15)

They stick together as usual…

 

Posted in Photos | Tagged , | 1 Comment

To Rome with Love (2012) ☆☆☆(3/4) : Four short comedies in Rome

toromewithlove04Woody Allen’s new movie “To Rome with Love” does not have that magical quality of his previous work “Midnight in Paris”(2011), but it is still an enjoyable film consisting of four short farces happening in Rome. The movie leisurely walks around the streets of Rome in lightweight mode, and, though the result is a mixed bag on the whole, it is a good one filled with enough wits and charms to be recommended.

Starting with the introduction by a traffic policeman telling us there are many stories in Rome, the movie simultaneously rolls and juggles four individual stories with no particular connection between them. Most of them are amusing or funny in each own way, and even one story not working well has few nice moments even though it remains unsatisfying in the end.

In case of the episode where Allen appears, he plays a former opera director named Jerry. Jerry and his psychiatrist wife Phyllis(Judy Davis, one of the regular actresses in Woody Allen movies) come from New York to Rome to visit their daughter Hayley(Alison Phill) and her Italian fiancé Michelangelo(Flavio Parenti) and his parents. While happy for his daughter’s upcoming wedding, Jerry is uncomfortable not only with his future son-in-law’s political view but also with the occupation of Michelangelo’s father Giancarlo, who works as an undertaker.

toromewithlove06But, when he discovers that Giancarlo, played by a real-life opera tenor singer Fabio Armiliato, sings fabulously while having a shower, his old professional instinct is stimulated by this discovery. He wants to present that wonderful talent to others in public, but there is one big problem; Giancarlo can sing well only when he is in shower booth. With a comic circumstance reminiscent of a classic short animation film “One Froggy Evening”(1955), this part becomes the funniest episode in the movie as it pushes its silly situation to the end, and I laughed a lot because of how it arrives at its outrageous but logical conclusion while maintaining its straight attitude.

I also enjoyed a typical Woody Allen romance story between Jesse Eisenberg, Greta Gerwig, and Ellen Page. Eisenberg plays Jack, a young would-be architect who has been living happily with his girlfriend Sally(Greta Gerwig) in Rome while preparing himself for his future on the horizon. On one day, Sally brings her actor friend Monica(Ellen Page) to their home for providing some comfort to her(she has just broken up with her latest boyfriend). They thought Monica would not affect their relationship, but, as they spend some time together, Jack finds himself being attracted to Monica – and so is Monica.

They are observed by John(Alec Baldwin), whom Jack encountered at the beginning of the episode. He keeps appearing around them, and he sometimes throws opinions and comments as Jack behaves unwisely. It is not so clear whether John is a real guy or the voice of reason in Jack’s mind or older Jack looking at his past from the future, but the interactions between Eisenberg, Page, and Baldwin are coupled with witty dialogues we can expect from Woody Allen, and they are pleasant to watch.

toromewithlove01Meanwhile, a young hopeful Italian couple arrives at Rome for getting a good opportunity to live there. Antonio(Alessandro Tiberi) is supposed to meet his relatives who will give him a promising job, but he gets stuck in a serious trouble when a hooker named Anna(Penélope Cruz) suddenly enters his hotel room. They quickly realize that there is a misunderstanding(she is sent to the wrong room), but, unfortunately, his relatives come to the room right at that moment, so now he has to pass her off as his wife in front of them.

While he continues to face more difficulties because of his deception, his wife Milly(Alessandra Mastronard) also finds herself in her own trouble when she goes out for finding a hairdresser’s and then loses her way in the city. While not knowing what to do, she encounters a film crew shooting a movie on location, and that is where she meets a famous actor Luca Salta(Antonio Albanese). She is surely excited to meet him as one of his fans, and that leads to another silly situation.

The least successful part belongs to Roberto Benigni. He plays an ordinary family man named Leopoldo, who is famous because he becomes famous when a group of paparazzi and reporters suddenly gather around him for no apparent reason. They keep annoying with trivial questions and endless flashlights, and he is completely at a loss at the center of this chaos.

toromewithlove03One main reason why this part does not work is that it tells a very familiar story about fame and its addictive aspects in a predictable storyline. Leopoldo slowly discovers that it is not that bad to be famous because he gets some advantages in exchange of his private life, but then, alas, they move their focus to another target, and the story ends with fizzle even though Benigni tries hard – or too hard, perhaps.

So, we have four short stories mixed together within a nice package decorated with the lovely sights of Rome, and it is a lightweight comedy with breezy fun even though it is two or three steps down from Allen’s best works. It may be disappointing to some of you and you may agree with some critic who said the movie was one of the worst movies of the last year, but we all can agree on one thing; as long as he lives and works, we can always expect another Woody Allen film soon coming to us.

Allen has recently been less prominent than before considering the overall quality of his recent works, but he has been consistently diligent for many years, and he already has a new movie to be shown to us in this year. The days of “Annie Hall”(1977) and “Hannah and Her Sisters”(1986) may never return, but you cannot help but admire his prolificacy. If you like “To Rome with Love”, then you’ll expect another fun from him. If you don’t like it, then you’ll expect a better fun from him. Isn’t everybody happy?

toromewithlove07

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Stand Up Guys (2012) ☆☆☆(3/4) : The lonely urban night of old guys

standupguys01He is ready to welcome his old friend who is finally released from prison after 28 years. They are still dear friend to each other, and they are going to have some fun for remembering their good old days. It may be their last night, but these old guys do not seem to worry much about what will happen on the next morning. Moving around several places amidst their lonely urban night, they observe and muse on their difficult situation with old men’s bitter humor as the time goes by, and the moment of decision is inevitably approaching to them as the sunrise begins.

“Stand Up Guys” is a small low-key character drama depending on the style and performances more than the story itself. Its story feels contrived at times and depends on coincidences a little too much, but it is an engaging story thanks to the performances from three aging actors we have been familiar with through many movies. They quickly establish their respective characters right from their first appearances, and we begin to enjoy how they interact with each other in front of the camera.

Christopher Walken, who looks more introspective and genial than before as he recently did in another quiet character drama “A Late Quartet”(2012), plays Doc, a retired criminal who has spent his time with drawing sunrise paintings at his small but cozy apartment. His tough days passed a long time ago, but now he is forced to do something he does not want to do at all – killing his close friend Val(Al Pacino).

small_standupguys06They meet each other as soon as Val gets out of the prison. They do not say a lot about what they did during their past or what happened during their unfortunate incident 28 years ago, but the bond between them is visible to us even though they have not seen each other for many years. Val has been a good stand up guy who did not tell anything about his colleagues during 28 years, and Doc wants his loyal friend to have a fun as much as he can as a free man. He takes Val to a bar and allows him to use the drugs they steal from a drugstore. He also takes him to a local brothel run by Wendy(Lucy Punch), whose mother was well acquainted with them in their past. Val takes too many Viagra pills for having sex at point, so we get a funny scene involving the serious tumescence of a certain body part.

As demanded by a local crime boss Claphands(Mark Margolis), Doc has to kill Val within hours. He will probably be killed along with Val if he doesn’t. When his guess is confirmed by Doc, Val is not so surprised about this because he has expected that kind of retribution. Claphands’ son was somehow killed by Val during that incident, and this old vicious man is determined to have his revenge on him. Claphands’ two henchmen keep appearing in Doc’s sight to pressure him, but neither Doc nor Val feels particularly threatened. They are very old, but they are the guys with few things to lose and few years to live.

While they are well aware that something should be done no matter how they feel about their situation, they keep moving around the night streets as coming across several lucky coincidences. When Val and Doc come to the hospital for an emergency problem, they encountered a nurse who is none other than the daughter of their old friend/colleague who was their wheelman. Nina(Julianna Marguiles, who holds her own little place well between two senior actors) tells them that her father is still alive and is living at a home for the aged, and they go straight to that place for meeting him, and Hirsch(Alan Arkin) instantly joins them even though he is suffering from emphysema. After taking a few breathes from his oxygen tank, Hirsch immediately sneaks out of the place with his friends, and he soon finds to his excitement that he has not lost any of his skill as an expert driver while driving their stolen sports car.

small_small_standupguys05I know it sounds quite unrealistic, but the movie does not try to look realistic from the beginning. The anonymous night streets its characters move around feel stark and empty, and there are not many people and cars in the movie. Wendy’s brothel, where Hirsch gives two girls an experience to remember, seems to have only two girls besides Wendy, and a diner where Doc frequently visits seems to have only one waitress. Her name is Alex(Addison Timlin), and we are surprised when it is revealed later that she means a lot to Doc.

While their performances in the movie may not be remembered as the best ones in their respectively illustrious careers, watching Christopher Walken, Al Pacino, and Alan Arkin in one movie is not something we can see every day, and they support the story and their characters with their mere presences. While Walken subtly suggests his character’s mixed feelings behind his quiet patience, Pacino brings pathos to his shabby character in a restrained performance, and they somberly click well together as the characters with a long history between them. Arkin is dryly humorous as usual between his two co-actors, and I think he had an amusing time when playing behind the wheel during one car chase sequence. How many old actors as aged as him can get a chance like that?

Noah Haidle’s screenplay is not without flaws, but it instead provides a nice playground for these three exceptional actors, and the director Fisher Stevens draws good performances from them through small moments. Although the result is pretty modest, his actors bring something special to their movie, and the movie becomes a poignant tale about the aging tough guys’ attempt to have the last big fun before their final destination. They are old, but they can try anyway.

small_standupguys02

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Oblivion (2013) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4) : It’s derivative, but it looks good anyway

small_oblivion07After grumbling about “Oblivion” to my lab colleagues right after the afternoon screening at the local theater today, I thought about how easily I could rate this derivative SF film. As a matter of fact, it is so derivative that all I have to do is just quoting well-known SF movies as many as possible in my review, and they will automatically be the standards for justifying my rating in the last paragraph of the review.

However, before complaining about its derivative aspects, I must admit that there are some fabulous sights in “Oblivion”. Its background is another classic case of the post-apocalyptic landscape on the Earth, and its story is packed with many familiar elements borrowed from other SF stories and films, but the visual splendor shown during the first half of the film was engaging enough to hold my interest. It soars with beautiful images for a while, but then it descends into standard action mode, and it finally arrives at the problematic ending which may baffle you a bit for its plot holes.

It is 2077, and, according to our hero Jack Harper(Tom Cruise), the humanity had a massive war with the aliens suddenly invading to the Earth sixty years ago. The war is over and the humans survive with victory, but the Earth becomes the radioactive wasteland not suitable for living while the moon is revolving around the Earth in a shattered form(but it certainly looks fantastic on the sky during night and day, anyway).

With his co-worker Victoria(Andrea Riseborough), Jack has been doing a pretty mundane job for quite a long time. As ordered and instructed from the big space station high above the atmosphere, they routinely check the massive machines which seem to somehow extract the energy from sea water in their area(the movie does not explain a lot about how that is possible), and they are well assisted by the numerous flying drones whose design is probably inspired by those space pods in “2001: A Space Odyssey”(1968). Whenever it is necessary, these drones are ready to terminate anything on their sights with their powerful lethal weapons.

small_oblivionJack and Victoria have been living in the station which looks like a new glassy modern house, and it is placed so high above the ground that you can see cloud sea sometimes at this place. It does not look particularly safe to live, and I think I will need some time for second thought before deciding to move into this place, but it is certainly cool to watch outside during sunrise or sunset at this place.

It is apparent that they are more than the partners in work. They look like a couple when they are together, but they do not know much about each other well except that they have the mission to be carried out. Their personal memories are erased as a safety measure(don’t expect any reasonable explanation on that), and they only know that the mission will be over after two weeks and then they will go to Titan, the largest moon of Saturn where surviving human beings settle after the war.

While Victoria, who is affectionately called “Vica” by Jack, has been yearning for going to Titan, Jack has a different idea. He has a private secret place hidden from detection, and it is surely not a bad place to live for the rest of his live. The trees and other plants grow well, and the water looks clean, and there is also a cabin where he keeps many things from the human civilization in the past. Watching this place, I could not help but think of the main robot character of the Pixar animation “Wall-E”(2008), which also actively collects the remnants from human society while doing its job alone on the contaminated Earth.

Their daily routine is disrupted when a space module suddenly crashes into the Earth. Jack manages to save a woman named Julia(Olga Kurylenko) at the crash site, and he instantly recognizes her because she is the woman he has kept seeing in his recurring dream. Julia also seems to recognize him, but she tells very little about how they know each other.

small_oblivion05Now I have to be a little more careful about describing the plot. We see that there are still the enemies moving around the ground, and it seems they are planning something as occasionally sabotaging Jack and Victoria’s mission. When the character played by Morgan Freeman appears in front of Jack, you will instantly realize the things are not what they seem to be on the surface.

The director/co-screenplay writer Joseph Kosinski previously directed “Tron: Legacy”(2010). It was a visually enjoyable work despite notable flaws, and the same thing can be said about this movie. With his crew including the cinematographer Claudio Miranda, who recently won an Oscar for “Life of Pi”(2012), Kosinski provides several visually splendid moments as the movie flies and looks around its wide and stark post-apocalyptic world, and they deserve to be appreciated on the big screen. CGI in the film always looks convincing, so we can believe the characters really inhabit their future world.

But still, the story is bland compared to its good visuals. Mainly due to its familiarity, it is easy to predict what will be revealed or what will happen next, and, for instance, it does not require 10 seconds to know what will be shown in the certain scene in which Jack comes to discover that he is not the only dude working around the Earth. The pace becomes frequently languid especially during the third act, and the finale is as simple-minded as that of “Independence Day”(1996).

small_oblivion04Tom Cruise does a fairly good job here as the hero who comes to know more than he wants, but most of his co-performers merely play the functional roles in the story. Andrea Riseborough has some emotional scenes to handle, but her character remains two-dimensional, and Olga Kurylenko is also wasted due to a similar problem. Morgan Freeman appears less than you expect in his paycheck role(but he does what is required for his role), and Melissa Leo is efficient in what could have been a thankless job.

As I said above, “Oblivion” reminded me of many other SF movies I have seen before, and my mind still keeps finding other ones even at this point. You will probably not waste your ticket money with this movie, and there are worse films out there in theaters, but I am rather reluctant to recommend it to you. When I watched “Prometheus”(2012) last year, I experienced awe from its alien world, and I admired its reach for greatness even though it half-succeeded in the end. In case of “Oblivion”, I only observed a well-made product ready to be sold to the audiences – and I wanted to move on to better things.

small_oblivion03

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Friday afternoon photos (2013/04/12)

It was chilly and a bit cloudy, but it was a lovely picnic time at the campus with occasional sunshine.

Posted in Photos | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Flowers and Avian campus gangs on spring afternoon (2013/04/08)

It’s still chilly, but flowers are everywhere – and so are the ruthless avian campus gangs.

Posted in Photos | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Fists of Legend (2013) ☆☆(2/4) : Lots of punches and kicks with little preparation

small_fistoflegend07Usually, the sports films about boxing or kickboxing or MMA or any other kinds of sports played in the ring/cage have the preparation/build-up process before their obligatory big showdown scene. Main characters are introduced in the beginning, and we get to know about them as their reasons to fight are presented or revealed through their drama. There is always that good old gym montage sequence where they sweat a lot as accompanied by dynamic soundtrack, and, yes, we will get excitement and following payoff in the end.

South Korean sports melodrama film “Fists of Legend” has enough weight and energy to endure these genre conventions, but it enters the ring too early, and it clumsily kicks and punches with little preparation for basic storytelling or character establishment. Out of curiosity, I checked my watch, and I found that 5 or 6 matches had been already played out on the screen. While they are technically admirable, they had already bludgeoned my nerve to exhaustion, and I think the same thing can be said about the story; it seems to be so punch-drunk that it rambles on lots of many subjects without going deeper into them during its 150 minutes.

Because I am not much of a sports fan, I do not know whether there is a reality show on S Korean TV like the one depicted in the movie, but I must say the show, named “Fists of Legend”, was pretty unpleasant to watch in the movie. They introduce the middle aged guys who have some experience with fighting in one way or another in their past, and they put them individually in the match with a professional MMA player to see whether they can go through at least one round. I really felt sorry for these old guys while disgusted by the show, but, as you know, the people in these days are willing to appear on TV for money and short-term fame even if they are to be put into misery and humiliation broadcast on live.

small_fistoflegend05The show is run by its ambitious producer Hong Gyoo-min(Lee Yo-won), who always speaks her lines with the sensibility of machine gun and the frigidity of wooden sculpture. While searching for other suitable players for her ongoing show, she focuses on Im Deok-gyoo(Hwang Jeong-min), who was once a promising boxer during his high school years but now is just a plain widower running his shabby noodle restaurant. He is not interested much in Gyoo-min’s offer, but, because of his hard economic situation, he eventually reconsiders his decision and enters the ring again.

Although being past his prime, he still has energy and skill for defense and attack, so he quickly becomes a media sensation as he keeps winning matches. He does not care about this newly gained fame, but his noodle restaurant business is boosted because of his popularity, and it seems it may provide him the chance to reconnect with his teenage daughter Soo-bin(Ji Woo), who usually goes back and forth between being sullen and being shrill because, well, she has problems.

Meanwhile, Deok-gyoo encounters Sang-hoon(Yoo Joon-sang) and Jae-seok(Yoon Je-moon), his old high school friends who also come to participate in the show for different reasons. Through several flashbacks, we see their rough high school days when they were bonded with each other, and we are also introduced to several other characters who indirectly or directly push them into the big matches during the second half of the story.

The movie tries to show and talk about many things, but none of them particularly sticks to the wall. Through the view of Sang-hoon, who works for a despicable CEO bully who was his high school ‘friend’, you may have some looks on the unpleasant aspect of South Korean society, but this part only exists for increasing Sang-hoon’s desperation and it is nothing more that. Gyoo-min looks like the main villain of the story, but the movie does not criticize her show much except throwing cheap shots through expendable comic characters, and the story does not seem to know what to do with her except supplying Lee Yo-won with those flat, lousy lines to be delivered.

small_fistoflegend03The three main actors nobly struggle with their underdeveloped roles, and their bodies and movements really show how much they prepared before entering the ring/cage unlike the movie itself. This is not the most interesting performance from Hwang Jeong-min, but he is likable enough to hold my attention for a while. Yoon Joon-sang plays his character with the pathos which will come close to many ordinary company men in South Korea, and I sort of believed in his character as much as Hwang’s character. Yoon Je-moon, who impressed me with his comic performance in “Dangerously Excited”(2011) in last year, is stuck with a thankless functional role, but he looks good in the ring none the less.

The rest of the cast is pretty much wasted in their one-dimensional characters. The young actors playing the younger versions of three main characters are convincing, but their story is not that interesting because it is another typical violent adolescence story with predictable turns. I sincerely want to believe Lee Yo-won’s bad performance is not entirely her fault, and I do not like how the movie blatantly manipulates Ji Woo’s teenage character for pumping out the emotions from the audiences.

If you only look for the excitement from the matches, you will be certainly not disappointed. With the help from the stunt/fight choreographer Jeong Doo-hong, one of the most valuable assets of South Korean film, the movie provides several well-made match scenes, and, despite quick-cutting and busy camera work, the sweaty physical feelings inside the ring/cage are palpable enough to make me wince several times.

“Fists of Legend” has good things like that, but it does not build enough momentum to grip my attention, and its ending is too anti-climactic compared to lots of punches and kicks thrown during more than 2 hours. Compared to the better films like “Warrior”(2011), which really pushes its dramatic conflict to the end with satisfaction, the movie just walks out of the ring and feels pretty good about that. How nice it is, but shouldn’t it have done more preparation and exercise before it entered?

small_fistoflegend01

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment