Anomalisa (2015) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): A quirky stop-motion animation a la Charlie Kaufman

anomalisa03“Anomalisa” is a stop-motion animated film from Charlie Kaufman, and this is certainly another odd, fascinating work from a talented writer/director who wrote the screenplays for “Being John Malkovich” (1999), “Adaptation.” (2002), “Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind” (2004), and his directorial debut work “Synecdoche, New York” (2008). Again, he looks into matters of human mind through an offbeat approach full of surprises and amusements, and the result is a unique work which is funny, insightful, and touching in its whimsical mix of melancholy, humor, and romance.

Its hero Michael (voiced by David Thewlis) is a self-help book author who is going to Cincinnati, Ohio for his book promotion at a hotel customer convention when we meet him during the opening scene. He has been lonely, desperate, and frustrated while feeling distant from others around him including his own family, and we soon notice this depressed guy’s warped state of mind right from the beginning. Everyone around him looks all the same while speaking in the same voice provided by Tom Noonan, and that reminds me of that famous scene in “Being John Malkovich”, where John Malkovich himself enters his own mind and sees a world literally full of Malkoviches.

While lodging at a hotel where the convention is being held, Michael prepares for his speech for the next day in his comfortable hotel room, but he comes to think more about his old girlfriend living in Cincinnati. Their breakup was unpleasant to say the least as reflected her old letter sent to him during that time, but now he wonders whether he can reconnect with her. He eventually calls her, so she comes into the hotel bar for meeting him, but that turns out to be disastrous to his dismay.

But then he comes across an unexpected chance when he returns to his room and takes a shower. He happens to hear a voice which seems to come from one of the other rooms on the same floor, and he is attracted to the voice because it sounds different from those many identical ones around him. He immediately searches for the source, and that is how he comes to meet Lisa (voiced by Jennifer Jason Leigh), a woman who is attending the convention along with her friend. She somehow looks different from others in his view, so Michael suggests that she and her friend should go down to the bar along with him, and he gets to know a little more about Lisa while spending time with them at the bar.

anomalisa02This is basically a conventional setup for romance tale, but the movie is imbued with quirky sensibility to entertain us, and Kaufman and his co-director Duke Johnson did a superlative job of making their characters on the screen look real and believable through skillful stop-motion animation. The body movements of the characters in the film are smooth and fluid without any awkwardness, and their presentation of emotions are conveyed well to us although they are still somewhere around the Uncanny Valley. We often notice their artificial quality, but that aspect somehow fits with the surreal atmosphere in the film, and Kaufman and Johnson often push that aspect to nice comic effects for our amusement. For instance, the movie does not flinch from nudity at all, you will see very clearly that the movie is rated R for good reasons.

The movie is also sincere and serious about its hero’s emotional matters. In objective view, Michael is no more than a miserable loser attempting an extramarital affair, but we come to understand his need and desperation as he clumsily approaches to Lisa. In case of Lisa, this shy woman is happy to receive the unexpected attention from a stranger, and we sense the mutual feeling growing between her and Michael as they talk more and more with each other.

In the end, they come to have their own private time in Michael’s room, and they eventually move onto the next logical step as being more comfortable with each other on the bed. I will not go into details, but I can tell you that Kaufman and Johnson find an effective way to present this rather graphic scene without looking silly or gratuitous. Accompanied with Carter Burwell’s restrained but sensitive score, it feels warm, tender, and intimate as two characters tentatively try to get closer to each other, and it also manages to sidestep the Uncanny Valley successfully and tastefully while letting us gradually involved in what is being exchanged between them.

anomalisa01

It also helps that David Thewlis and Jennifer Jason Leigh click well with each other in their voice performance. Thewlis is excellent as a sad man struggling with his deep emotional problems, and Leigh, who is far softer than her nasty Oscar-nominated turn in “The Hateful Eight” (2015), complements her co-star well with her gentle performance. Noonan, who drew my attention for the first time through his crucial supporting turn in “Synecdoche, New York”, has lots of fun with handling the rest of the characters in the film, and his flat, monotonous voice further accentuates the drab environment encompassing Michael and Lisa with great effects.

While less dense and cerebral compared to Kaufman’s previous works, “Anomalisa”, which deservedly received an Oscar nomination for Best Animated Feature Film, is mostly successful in its bold storytelling experiment despite its few flaws including its overlong third act. It is definitely weird, but it ultimately looks into human matters we can empathize with, and it eventually illuminates a few important things about human relationship.

While watching the movie, I was reminded of that good advice on relationship which is given to the young heroine of “Juno” (2007) by her no-nonsense father: “Look, in my opinion, the best thing you can do is find a person who loves you for exactly what you are. Good mood, bad mood, ugly, pretty, handsome, what have you, the right person is still going to think the sun shines out your ass. That’s the kind of person that’s worth sticking with.” I think Kaufman would wholeheartedly agree to that.

   Sidenote: The movie is based on the play of the same name which was written by Kaufman under the pseudonym Francis Fregoli. His pseudonym came from the Fregoli disorder, a rare mental disorder in which, according to the Wikipedia, “a person holds a delusional belief that different people are in fact a single person who changes appearance or is in disguise.”

anomalisa04

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Boy & the World (2013) ☆☆☆(3/4): Simple but Marvelous

boyandtheworld01

Brazilian animated feature film “Boy & the World” looks quite simple at first, but its kaleidoscopic presentation of colors and lines and shapes on the screen is something to behold. I was involved in its numerous marvelous visual moments, and I observed its creative style and imagination with lots of curiosity and interest. Although it is a small modest work on the whole, it will linger on you after you watch it, and it is no wonder that it was recently nominated for Best Animated Feature Film Oscar.

After zooming out through a dazzling series of various colorful patterns during its opening sequence, the movie presents its young boy hero and the rural background surrounding him. While he and his world are depicted through the seemingly rudimentary animation style reminiscent of kids’ crude sketches, the screen is soon filled with boundless curiosity and excitement as the boy freely roams here and there around his world. He bounces around a field whose blank space is spotted with colorful flowers and grasses, he climbs up in a forest full of many different creatures, and he even jumps on clouds in the sky once he reaches to the top of trees.

He has lived happily with his parents in their small hut, but his father soon leaves the family for earning money in some big city far away from their place. The boy naturally feels sad to see his father going away, but there is nothing he can do, and he misses his father more as days goes by. He remembers when he and his father once spent a night together, and his father’s flute gives us one of the most enchanting moments in the film.

boyandtheworld02

On one day, the boy decides to go to the city for finding his father. Along with a suitcase, he somehow gets drifted away from his home during one surreal sequence, and then he finds himself waking up in a small shabby tent belonging to some old man. When the boy gets out of the tent, we see that there are so many other tents around it, and their abstract shapes are all lined up in several rows across the screen. Along with the old man and his dog, the boy goes to a big, wide cotton plantation where the old man and many other people work, and we cannot help but dazzled by countless clockwork movements on the screen as the workers busily work in the plantation, while also reminded of how expendable they are as cheap laborers.

When the boy goes to a factory where loads of cotton are processed into fabrics, we see another sight of labor exploitation. Doing their respective jobs again and again throughout their work hour, the factory workers look pretty much like cogs of a huge machine, and that aspect took me back to those horrifyingly breathtaking factory scenes in great SF film “Metropolis” (1927).

Speaking of “Metropolis”, the movie goes into a more futuristic mode as the boy arrives in the city, which looks like a tall, giant tower when it is viewed from the distance. Around the base of the city, countless houses belonging to poor people are stacked around each other with webs of steep steps, and we also see many buildings being built in the upper area of the city. As following a young factory worker who lives in the city, the boy experiences so many things here and there around this alien urban environment, and he eventually stays around that young man while keeping looking for his father.

And we continue to get impressive moments to remember. We see several silly commercials which look deliberately cheap in their droll collage style. We enjoy many vehicles and machines which amusingly look like big metal animals. We savor a number of musical scenes where their rapturous mood is expressed through thousands of colorful bubbles emitted from musical instruments. We behold a place floated above the sea in the sky, and there is an exciting scene which shows how this place efficiently handles many container ships loaded with supplies.

boyandtheworld04

The movie becomes darker as the boy witnesses the other side of this curious world later in the story. When machines are introduced into the factory, the factory workers instantly become jobless and have to look for job again. During one sad scene at a train station, the boy painfully realizes how futile his attempt to find his father in the city is. It seems the city and its citizens are ruled under some military dictatorship, and one striking sequence indirectly reflects that harsh reality through a brutal metaphoric duel in the sky.

The director/writer Alê Abreu goes further with the insertion of a sudden montage sequence of archival footage showing destructive industrial activities on nature environment, but I am not so sure about whether this part is effective, for we have already get his messages around that point. As stretching out its thin plot which could have been more suitable for short animated film, the movie loses some of its narrative momentum during its last act, but it manages to arrive at the poignant ending which will make you look back on what you have seen from its young hero’s journey.

Overall, I had a fun, interesting time with “Boy and the World”, and I think you will enjoy it a lot if you are looking for something different from those usual digital animated films. I do not know whether young audiences will get the messages behind the film, but they will certainly be charmed by its lively animation and joyous spirit on the screen. It may be merely all about style, but sometimes that is more than enough in case of animated film.

boyandtheworld03

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

When Marnie Was There (2014) ☆☆☆(3/4): The last Ghibli animation, probably

whenmarniewasthere02Watching Japanese animated feature film “When Marnie Was There” is a bittersweet experience because this may be the last work from Studio Ghibli, which has been in a ‘temporary’ hiatus period since “When Marnie Was There” was released in Japan in 2014 July. After its two leading animation directors Hayao Miyazaki and Isao Takahata went into retirement after their respective swan songs came out in 2013, the future of Studio Ghibli became more uncertain than before, and now it looks more possible that its great era is really being finished with “When Marnie Was There”, which is incidentally its 20th feature film.

While it is based on the 1967 young adult novel of the same name written by British writer Joan G. Robinson, the screenplay by Masashi Andō, Keiko Niwa, and Hiromasa Yonebayashi transfers the original plot to the modern Japanese background. Since she lost her close family members when she was very young, Anna (voiced by Sara Takatsuki) has been raised well by her kind legal guardian Yoriko (voiced by Nanako Matsushima) in Sapporo, but she is recently going through a tough time as being more conscious of herself being different from others because of her blue eyes, and she also feels hurt by the fact that she does not know anything about her dead parents or any other family members of hers.

Besides being more introverted and melancholic than before, Anna frequently suffers from asthma, so Yoriko, who seems genuinely concerned about Anna’s well-being, follows the doctor’s order. When the summer vacation begins, she sends Anna to a rural seaside town for clean fresh air, and Kiyomasa (voiced by Susumu Terajima) and Setsu (voiced by Toshie Negishi), a warm, ebullient couple who are Yoriko’s relatives, gladly welcome Anna into their cozy home located at the fringe of the town.

Getting accustomed to her new environment, Anna comes to notice a big abandoned house across a salt marsh during one day. While the house feels somehow familiar to her, it seems to be haunted by something as Anna gets a closer look at the house, and she later experiences a brief but vivid illusion of the house being lighted and enlivened. She later hears a bit about who owned the house a long time ago, and then she has a dream about the house during her sleep.

whenmarniewasthere06

In that dream, there was a mysterious blonde blue-eyed girl around her age, and Anna happens to encounter that girl in question at the house during the summer festival evening. Her name is Marnie (voiced by Kasumi Arimura), and Anna and Marnie quickly become friends although it is apparent that Marnie is a sort of ghost living in the house. When Marnie takes Anna into her house during the next evening, the house looks as bright and lively as previously glimpsed by Anna, and it is also full of people who seems to be transferred from its old swinging days.

As Marnie becomes closer to Anna as her secret friend, we come to see how these two girls connect so easily with each other even though they have never met before. Marnie has been sad and lonely while her parents are usually absent in the house, and her sadness touches Anna, who also has her fair share of sadness just like her. As they open themselves more to each other, Anna confides the main source of her current angst to Marnie, and she also helps Marnie overcome her own fear at another ghostly spot in the town.

While their story is leisurely moved toward the finale coupled with melodramatic revelations, the director Hiromasa Yonebayashii, who previously directed “Arrietty” (2010), and his crew provide a number of gorgeous visual moments we can expect from Studio Ghibli. The lush, vibrant cell animation style of the film always comes with details to be savored and appreciated, and the seaside town in the film looks charming and relaxing along with a number of colorful supporting characters. Besides Kiyomasa and Setsu, there are a gruff, taciturn old man who prefers to be left alone while he is fishing on his boat of solitude, a graceful painter lady who seems to know something about Marnie, and a plucky girl named Sayaka (voiced by Hana Sugisaki), who moves from Tokyo along with her family and is willing to be Anna’s next best friend.

whenmarniewasthere04

“When Marnie Was There” is less distinctive compared to Miyazaki’s “The Wind Rises” (2013) and Takahata’s “The Tale of Princess Kaguya” (2013), but all of these three recent Ghibli animated feature films share a common elegiac tone among them. Although I found myself distant to “The Wind Rises” due to its superficial treatment of the dark war history behind its story, but, as watching its wistful ending, I understood that Miyazaki really made his bow through this problematic but admirable animated film, and the same thing can be said about “The Tale of Princess Kaguya”. Just his close colleague, Takahata said goodbye to his audiences through his last work, and that makes the tearful inevitability of its delicate finale all the more emotionally resonant. The ending scene of “When Marnie Was There” also features many goodbyes, and there is a bittersweet feeling underneath it despite its hopeful tone.

Although it received an Oscar nomination like two aforementioned animated films, “When Marnie Was There” will probably be remained as a minor footnote in the history of Studio Ghibli, but it is still a sincere mix of fantasy and coming-of-age drama which is also worthwhile to watch for beautiful animation style. Maybe we will never see another new work from Studio Ghibli, but at least we can say goodbye to it for now – as only hoping for the possibility of next time.

Footnote: In case of the English dubbing version, several notable American performers including Hailee Steinfeld, Vanessa L. Williams, Catherine O’Hara, Geena Davis, John C. Reilly, Ellen Burstyn, and Kathy Bates provided voice performances.

whenmarniewasthere01

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

45 Years (2015) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): Sobering ruminations on their long relationship

45years02They have known and lived with each other for many years, but now they start to feel anxious and uncertain about their relationship after a sudden news comes in from the old past. As its aging couple begin to ruminate more on their long life and relationship, “45 Years” closely observes small emotional ripples around them, and its somber but intimate presentation of their personal conflict gives us searing moments of quiet but powerful emotions. The more they reflect on the past, the more they feel confused and bitter about what was lost or gone a long time ago, and they inevitably come to have questions and doubts on their seemingly stable relationship. Have they been just stuck with each other from the beginning without really knowing each other? And can they still go on together during the rest of their remaining life, in spite of this unexpected crisis to shake both of them?

In the beginning, the movie shows us how Kate (Charlotte Rampling) and Geoff (Tom Courtenay) begin another usual week in their provincial neighborhood, and we gradually gather some details about their life and relationship during last 45 years. While they did not have any children between them, they are happy and comfortable to be with each other in their cozy retirement life, and the upcoming Saturday is the 45th anniversary of their wedding. They are not that excited about that because they are so accustomed to each other in their life like many other old couples, but it is still an important event for them mainly because they missed the 40th anniversary due to Geoff’s health problem.

And then Geoff receives a letter from Switzerland in the morning. 50 years ago, Geoff had a close relationship with a girl he could have married if she had not fallen into a crevice during their trip in the Alps, and the letter says her frozen dead body was recently found in nearly intact shape. While the woman has been no secret at all between Geoff and Kate, this belated news of her death somehow triggers something which has been dormant in the corner of Geoff’s mind. Musing on how young his old lover still looks as he remembers, he frequently recollects his good times with her, and then he becomes more drawn to the past he supposedly left behind after he met and married Kate.

45years01

Kate naturally becomes confused and angered by the hovering presence of this dead woman she barely knew. She may be curious about how much Geoff was close to his old lover during that time, but she also cannot help but feel uncomfortable and jealous as watching her husband becoming distant from his wife, and their relationship accordingly becomes strained day by day even while they keep their appearance in front of their friends looking forward to attending their wedding anniversary party.

As Kate and Geoff respectively cope with their problem, the director Andrew Haigh, who adapted David Constantine’s short story “In Another Country” for his film, handles their story with that tactful restraint and sensitivity shown from his previous film “Weekend” (2011), a small sensitive drama about one accidental intimate relationship between two young gay men. While “45 Years” is a lot different from “Weekend” in many contrasting aspects, its drama also depends on the small but crucial interactions between its two main characters, and, thanks to Haigh’s thoughtful direction, their emotional impacts are succinctly conveyed to us while never disrupting the overall sober mood of the film.

Although we do not know everything about Kate and Geoff, they come to us as a real couple with the long history between them, and Haigh’s two lead performers seamlessly embody their respective characters with the natural sense of age and experience exuded from their unadorned but distinctive screen presence. Since “Georgy Girl” (1966) and “The Night Porter” (1974), Charlotte Rampling has always been an interesting actress to watch with her sharp, enigmatic grace during last 50 years, and she has lost none of it yet although she is going to have her 70th Birthday in next month. While most of you probably remember him for his Oscar-nominated supporting role in “Doctor Zhivago” (1965), Tom Courtenay was utterly electrifying in Tony Richardson’s great film “The Loneliness of the Long-distance Runner” (1962), and I still see the remnants of its young defiant hero from this respectable British stage/film actor’s aging face.

45years03

Rampling deservedly received an Oscar nomination for her delicately controlled performance in the film, and she has a number of fine nuanced scenes as the movie begins to put a little more emphasis on Kate’s side during its second half. In one certain scene where Kate comes to know a lot more about her husband’s past, Rampling’s rigid wordless face speaks volume through her subtle handling of thoughts and feelings churning inside Kate, and that is more than enough for conveying the bitter devastation and resignation felt by her.

Courtenay, who received the Silver Bear Award along with Rampling at the Berlin International Film Festival early in last year for their fabulous duo performance in the movie and is going to have his 79th birthday in next month, steadily holds his place besides his co-star as the other half of the movie. While his character feels increasingly distant to us as well as Kate, Courtenay lets us see and understand a man compelled to think more about how things could have been different in his life, and that is why we come to have some reservation on Geoff’s particularly amiable gestures toward his wife later in the story.

“45 Years” is a humble but sublime work about life, relationship, and love, and you will be impressed by how it elegantly balances itself between stability and fragility of human relationship to the very end without any definite answer. Whatever you think about its finale, Haigh, Rampling, and Courtenay give us an adult drama both intelligent and heartfelt, and it is surely one of the most human films from last year.

45years05

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The Measure of a Man (2015) ☆☆☆(3/4): A man’s quiet economic struggle

Themeasureofaman2015Calmly looking into its plain working class hero’s quiet economic struggle, French social drama film “The Measure of a Man” shares his desperation and frustration with us during the first half and then throws some hard moral questions during the second half. Can he live with the price he must pay for maintaining a hard-earned status he cannot easily give up? And what can he really do in front of the harsh capitalistic reality which corners not only him but also many others around him?

Thierry Taugourdeau (Vincent Lindon) is a middle-aged man who has been unemployed for around two years since he lost his old factory job. Fortunately, he and his family are not in the worst situation at least because they have so far depended on their savings and his monthly unemployment check, but time and money are running out for them, and he really has to grab any possible job opportunity as soon as possible.

But getting a job is not easy at all for people like him. During the opening scene, we watch the conversation between Thierry and an employment agency counsellor, and the growing exasperation inside Thierry becomes more palpable as he patiently tries to make his points on how useless a training session he and others recently took turns out to be. Sure, its well-meaning purport is giving them a new job opportunity, but they still cannot get employed mainly due to their age and insufficient experience. After all, who will possibly be interested in them when there are many others looking more suitable in the labor market? “Le Loi du marche”, the original French title of the movie, means “The Law of the Market” in English, and that hurtfully reflects our hero’s currently downgraded labor value as much as the English title itself.

Themeasureofaman05As Thierry keeps looking for any chance of employment, we see more of how difficult the situation is for him and his family. He feels happy and comfortable whenever he is with his loving wife and their disabled son, but they may have to sell their apartment someday if that is necessary for sustaining their current situation. In addition, their son, a bright teenager boy whose spirit is not hindered by his disability at all, wants to go to a better school for his academic aspiration, and that means there will be another financial burden for his parents.

There is an increasingly tense scene among Thierry, his wife, and a couple who want to buy their old mobile home. When they come to haggle over its price, it initially looks like a simple matter of cutting several hundred euro off the originally offered price, but we come to sense that every euro is really important for Thierry and his wife. They may be disadvantaged in front of their potential buyers, but they adamantly sticks to their original price because they cannot afford to stand back.

Maintaining its calm, non-judgmental viewpoint on Thierry’s ongoing plight, the movie sometimes shows a dry sense of wry humor. His job interview scene via Skype is painfully awkward as it becomes quite clear to him and us that his unseen interviewer does not want him although the guy never tells that directly to him. During one of Thierry’s usual training sessions, others in the session point out a number of reasons why Thierry does not look so good during his mock video interview, and he has to endure their critical comments one by one. As the cinematographer Éric Dumont’s handheld camera firmly and tightly focuses on Thierry’s phlegmatic façade in its medium shot, Vincent Lindon, who won the Best Actor award at the Cannes Film Festival early in last year (the movie also won the Prize of the Ecumenical Jury at the festival), is superb in his understated performance, and it is compelling to watch how he subtly conveys to us his character’s quiet humiliation while never signifying too much to us.

Themeasureofaman03Anyway, that painful moment seems to give Thierry a lesson to be learned, for we soon see him being employed as a security guard at a local branch of some big supermarket chain. While occasionally watching around this wide place, he also learns how to operate many CCTV cameras placed here and there around the ceiling, and we get an interesting scene which shows how this place is being monitored at each second through those cameras. Some of them can actually be moved along their tracks while not noticed by anyone below, and we also hear about how certain customers can be spotted as potential shoplifters.

Of course, his new job turns out to be not as easy as it looks at first, and his following moral dilemma reminds me of the similar one in Ramin Bahrani’s “99 Homes” (2014). Like the young struggling working class hero of that movie, Thierry frequently finds himself on the position opposite to people who are not very different from him, and he has to be as harsh as demanded no matter how much he feels sorry for them. His respective scenes with these desperate people feel stark and uncomfortable as the camera coldly watches on the routine procedure of him and other security guards, and we cannot help but feel chilled and disgusted when the head of the human resources department later gives Thierry and other employees a banal affirmation on how they have nothing to do with a tragic incident involved with one recently fired employee.

Reminiscent of the Dardenne brothers’ films including “Two Days, One Night” (2014), “The Measure of a Man” admirably sticks to its austere realistic approach to the very end. I have some reservation on whether its finale is as effective as the director/co-writer Stéphane Brizé intended, but Brizé did a commendable job of serving us with a slice of hard working class life, and I appreciated how Lindon is flawlessly mixed with the non-professional performers surrounding him on the screen. This veteran actor is not widely known outside his country (I only came to recognize him through Philippe Lioret’s “Welcome” (2009)), but you will not easily forget his presence as well as his ordinary but unforgettable human hero once the movie is over.

A016

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Zero Motivation (2014) ☆☆☆(3/4): Israeli female solders stuck in office job

zeromotivation02

Through the droll observation on a bunch of female soldiers who have to cope with their drab, suffocating daily life at the base, Israeli comedy film “Zero Motivation” delights us with unexpected moments of amusement and laugh. I did not like the movie at first that because it was a bit disorienting as casually shifting itself around different modes in its loose episodic narrative, but then I found myself chuckling a lot, and I eventually came to enjoy more of how this witty, smart work accomplishes its missions.

During the opening scene, we meet two young Israeli female soldiers in the middle of their mandatory military service years. Zohar (Dana Ivgy) is usually cynical and sullen while having no particular hope about being transferred from their dull, joyless desk position in the personnel department, but Daffi (Nelly Tagar), who is a little chirpier compared to her glum friend/colleague, still hopes that she will be transferred to any urban base better than their current one in a remote desert area. In fact, she has been sending many letters for transfer request to her superiors, though she still has not received any answer from the above yet.

When Daffi and Zohar are returning to their base along with other soldiers after the end of their brief vacation, they happen to be accompanied by Tehila (Yonit Tobi, who looks convincingly unsure and mousy as demanded), and Daffi is excited as Tehila begins to work in the personnel department as its new lackey. It seems that Tehila is sent here as someone to replace Daffi, and Daffi is ready to teach Tehila how to shred useless personnel documents or how to handle coffee and snacks for routine officer meetings. While Daffi and her office colleagues are non-combatant soldiers technically, they are pretty much like office drones, and their service is always taken for granted by their superiors without any consideration or appreciation.

zeromotivation04

In the meantime, the movie observes the daily ennui among soldiers in the base, and its wry absurd comedy is not that far from its predecessors including “MASH” (1970), “Catch-22” (1970), and “Jarhead” (2005). Although the movie is not so clear or specific about the situation outside the base, Israel seems to be going through another serious geopolitical conflict, but nothing much happens in the base in contrast as Zohar, Daffi, and their several colleagues go through their tedious work hours without much excitement or motivation. Unlike their fastidious direct superior Rama (Shani Klein), they do not care much about their boring paperwork, and they are instead far more interested in who will set a new record in the Minesweeper computer game. As they and other female soldiers are frequently around male soldiers in the base, casual sex comes handy for them if they want, and that surely puts off their boredom at least for a while.

And then a sad, unfortunate incident happens to the dismay of everyone in the base, and Daffi and Zohar gradually find themselves being distant from each other during its aftermath. While feeling more frustrated and desperate than ever due to her ever-decreasing hope for transfer, Daffi happens to discover that there is actually a good opportunity for fulfilling her long wish, and she immediately grasps it with no hesitation, though that means she is not going to be around her friend any more.

Zohar is naturally displeased about her friend’s decision, but then the movie changes its course as Zohar comes to be occupied with her small private mission. As being more aware that she has not had any sexual experience yet unlike many of her female colleagues, Zohar becomes determined to lose her virginity as soon as possible, and the movie draws a number of good laughs while developing this amusing circumstance through several surprising moments including one spooky possibility of spiritual possession.

zeromotivation06

“Zero Motivation” is the first feature film by the director/writer Talya Lavie, who previously won the Panorama Audience Award for her 2006 short film “The Substitute” at the Berlin International Film Festival. That short film eventually became the starting point for her feature film, and you will not be surprised to learn that Lavie’s own experiences in the Israeli Defence Forces were the major inspiration for both films. Just like the main characters in “Zero Motivation”, she had to endure the tedium of paper-pushing work during her military service years, and you may get the glimpses of her real-life experiences through the small realistic details and sharp insights shown in the film. No matter how much silly and absurd the movie becomes, it is always grounded in considerable realism under Lavie’s competent direction, and some of its amusing moments indirectly point out those universal human problems within military organization, such as sexism among male superiors.

The characters in the film initially look broad, but they are well-defined figures who often surprise us with good comic/dramatic effects. Dana Ivgy and Nelly Tagar complement each other well through the contrasting personalities of their characters, and one of their best scenes comes from when the movie later places their characters in a changed circumstance. I will not go into details for your entertainment, but let’s say that the movie serves us with quite an uproarious moment incidentally featuring a pair of staple guns. In case of the supporting cast members in the film, Shani Klein is notable as a by-the-book officer who turns out to have her own frustration and disappointment as much as her soldiers, and Tamara Klingon is especially hilarious when her character alarms others with sudden strange behaviors.

I think its third act could spend a little more time on the buildup process preceding the eventual finale, but “Zero Motivation” is still an entertaining comedy on the whole, and Lavie definitely makes a lasting impression on the audiences through her confident filmmaking. It is always interesting to come across a new talent, and we may see more from her during the next following years.
zeromotivation01

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Goosebumps (2015) ☆☆☆(3/4): You know what is going to scare you…

goosebumps02Around this Monday, I finished reading “Joyland”, one of Stephen King’s recent novels. While its story revolves around a dark murder mystery involved with one plain but special amusement park in North Carolina, I enjoyed its vivid, affectionate description of that amusement park, and one of the memorable things in the book was its fun house. While its visitors know what they are probably going to get once they enter this place, they do get scared or thrilled thanks to its nice surprises to shock and delight them during their ride, and I was amused by the details on how this facility is operated for its visitors’ scary fun time.

“Goosebumps”, which is based on the popular series of children’s horror stories written by R.L. Stine, is pretty much like that fun house. We know what we can expect from it, and it does not disappoint us as serving us with lots of things to frighten and entertain us. Although it is not that fresh in terms of story and characters, the movie knows how to have a jolly thrilling fun with its various familiar horror fantasy elements, and it is more than enough for me to overlook its several noticeable weak points.

When our teenager hero Zach Cooper (Dylan Minnette) and his mother Gale (Amy Ryan) move to Madison, Delaware for her new position in a local high school, Zach senses something weird about a house right next to their new home. The house in question belongs to an unknown reclusive writer who barely shows himself to his neighbors, and Zach later encounters the writer’s adolescent daughter Hannah (Odeya Rush), who usually stays inside the house with her father. They are instantly attracted to each other right from the start, and he is glad to have a wonderful night time with her at a nearby abandoned amusement park, whose shabby charm reminds me a lot of the one depicted in King’s aforementioned novel.

goosebumps04But their relationship soon faces the objection of Hannah’s father, who looks very determined to keep himself and her daughter away from others for some reason. Zach naturally wonders about what is really going on between this strange father and daughter, so he eventually sneaks into the writer’s house along with his nerdy schoolmate Champ (Ryan Lee), but, as soon as they enter the house, the boys realize that they come into a situation they do not entirely understand yet. When they enter the writer’s library, they find many mysterious books locked on their cover, and it turns out that the writer is none other than R.L. Stine (Jack Black).

The amusing fictional premise in the movie is that all those terrible creatures in Stine’s stories are not fictional at all in its metafiction world. Because of the supernatural gift he happened to acquire during his early years, anything Stine imagines through his writing becomes real, and he has so far managed to keep his dark creations locked inside his original manuscripts while quietly enjoying the success of his many scary stories.

Of course, it is not much of a spoiler to tell you that Zach and Champ come to open one of Stine’s books and then all hell breaks loose as a consequence. Their town and its residents are soon terrorized by many different creatures including a big yeti, a humongous mantis, a furry werewolf, and Slappy the Dummy (voiced by Jack Black). Having a lot of personal grudges against Stine, this malicious dummy is ready to get his payback moment from his creator, and so are many other creatures released from Stine’s books.

goosebumps01As Zach, Champ, Hannah, and Stine try to find any possible solution for this messy emergency, the movie keeps throwing lots of CGI creatures into the screen. While these creatures look scary enough to maintain the constant level of tension and excitement in the film, there is always the sly sense of humor behind their scenes. You may notice a number of humorous references to several well-known horror films such as “The Blob” (1958) and “The Shining” (1980), and I particular liked a menacing black car reminiscent of the similar evil vehicle in cult horror film “The Car” (1977).

The performers in the movie did a competent job of looking believably scared or threatened amidst numerous special effects on the screen. Jack Black seems to be trying too hard at first, but he gets better while his character goes through personal development as required for his new story to write, and he surely enjoys himself in his mischievous voice performances for Slappy the Dummy and the other creature which is another nice surprise in the film. While Dylan Minnette is your average clean-cut teenager hero, Ryan Lee mainly functions as his goofy comic foil, and Odeya Rush is charming as a love interest with hidden poignancy. It is disappointing to see that Amy Ryan is stuck in a bland supporting role which does not demand much from her considerable talent, but that fortunately remains as a minor weakness as the movie busily bounces around its main attractions on the plot.

On the whole, “Goosebumps” is a solid family entertainment packaged with enjoyable goodies for your entertainment. Some of its action scenes may be a little too intense for its young audiences, but the movie is still a safe PG-rated product, and I observed that not many characters get hurt in the film even though many of its creatures look quite lethal and dangerous. Considering that kids in these days are accustomed to those bombastic actions in superhero films, they will probably enjoy the movie more comfortably than we think.

goosebumps03

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Steve Jobs (2015) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): Jobs viewed through a three-act backstage drama

stevejobs01Through its fictional narrative structure, “Steve Jobs” attempts to give us a complex portrayal of one fascinating real-life figure whose grand, ambitious visions have influenced our modern world – or our modern electronic industry and market at least. Although its dramatic presentation is not exactly revealing especially if you are very familiar with the subject, the movie works a very engaging character drama fueled by its smart screenplay and excellent performances, and it is entertaining to see how it smoothly moves through its three individual main stages with style and mood as constructing a multi-dimensional portrait both human and abstract.

Based on the biography of the same name by Walter Isaacson, the adapted screenplay by Aaron Sorkin focuses on three highlight moments of late Steve Jobs’s life. In 1984, Jobs, played by Michael Fassbender, is about to do the product launch of the Apple Macintosh personal computer, and we are introduced to a number of people who revolve around him throughout the film. In 1988, we see Jobs preparing for another important product launch, but he is no longer in Apple after fired from his own company 3 years ago, and he knows well the risks he is going to take through his bold action. In 1998, Jobs is back in Apple with absolute control, and he is fully ready to present its new personal computer iMac G3, which will take his company to the next level.

In each of these three sections, the movie focuses closely on how Jobs handles several small and big matters thrust upon him during his painstaking preparation process before his glorious show time on the stage, and the movie becomes a sort of backstage drama while the cinematographer Alwin H. Küchler’s camera fluidly moves along with Jobs and others around the three stage backgrounds shown in the film. As he acknowledges at one point, Jobs sees himself as the conductor of a symphony performance to be held, and he surely demands his ‘players’ that they should make everything in his presentation played exactly and beautifully as he wanted from the very beginning.

stevejobs04

It is widely known that Jobs was quite abrasive and demanding to his employees who both disliked and admired him, and the movie does not hide that aspect at all as depicting his bumpy interactions with his marketing executive Joanna Hoffmann (Kate Winslet) and his head technician Andy Hertzfeld (Michael Stuhlbarg). As his right arm person who knows and understands Jobs better than many others, Hoffmann firmly keeps her position besides her boss while functioning as his calm, no-nonsense voice of reason, and we are not surprised to learn later that she is one of a few people who can stand up to Jobs if that is necessary. Hertzfeld is diligent and resourceful even when he is suddenly tasked with a job to be accomplished within around 30 minutes, and you may see how Jobs brought the best out of his people – by any means necessary.

As Job’s sharp mind is busy with his work, anything besides that looks like trivial annoyances to be dismissed and discarded for him, and we witness more of Job’s worse sides mainly through three people who feel hurt and betrayed by him. His ex-girlfriend Chrisann Brennan (Katherine Waterston) always finds herself being frustrated and exasperated whenever Jobs callously treats her with his aloof attitude mixed with stubborn pettiness, and we hear about how lousy Jobs is as the father of their young daughter. Job’s friend Steve Wozniak (Seth Rogen), who co-founded Apple with him and made the Apple I and II computers, tries to maintain their long friendship, but Jobs is not so good at treating well his friend who was crucial in the early success of their company. In case of John Sculley (Jeff Daniels), the CEO of Apple who was recruited by Jobs himself, he tries to support Jobs like a patient father, but he also gets his own headaches even after Jobs is fired from Apple.

Sorkin previously wrote the Oscar-winning screenplay for David Fincher’s “The Social Network” (2010), and he is indeed an ideal writer for the movie. Like Mark Zuckerberg in “The Social Network”, Steve Jobs is shrewd and intelligent enough to see the future of our digital age, and he does not understand human relationships well while only caring about what interests his mind (“I don’t want people to dislike me. I’m indifferent to whether they dislike me.”). Observe how he becomes softer when he shows his young daughter how to use the Macintosh, even though he argued with his ex-girlfriend just before that. Or watch how he looks a little friendlier when he shows his interest to Wozniak’s new electronic gadget, even though they are not so pleased about each other at that point.

stevejobs03 Like “The Social Network” and “Moneyball” (2011), Sorkin’s screenplay for “Steve Jobs” is packed with long well-written dialogue scenes, and we go along with its swift narrative flow as these dialogues scenes are delivered quick and fast by the wonderful performers in the film. Although he does not resemble Jobs much compared to Ashton Kutcher in “Jobs” (2013), Michael Fassbender, who is no stranger to playing cold, intense characters with dark shades, is electrifying as a callous but charismatic man relentlessly driven by his single-minded ambition, and we have no problem in accepting him as Jobs from the start. While Kate Winslet, who is deservedly Oscar-nominated along with Fassbender, is fabulous as his equal acting match, Seth Rogen shows again how effortlessly he can dial down his comic persona whenever it is necessary, and Jeff Daniels and Michael Stuhlbarg are reliable as usual while having each own moment in front of Fassbender. As Job’s daughter, Makenzie Moss, Ripley Sobo, and Perla Haney-Jardine are flawlessly connected together in their performance, and their scenes with Fassbender are poignant as Jobs clumsily shows his better side through his strained relationship with his daughter, who has somehow grown up well despite her problematic childhood years and becomes a bit closer to her distant father in the end.

Shooting his movie at the real locations where Jobs actually did his product launches as depicted in the film, the director Danny Boyle, who has never made a boring film during his bouncy filmmaking career, imbues three parts of his film with distinctive aural/visual ambiences. The 1984 part was shot with 16mm film at the Flint Center of De Anza community college in Cupertino, California, and the rough tone of this part is accompanied with Daniel Pemberton’s propulsive synthesizer music evoking that recognizable 1980s music style. The 1988 part was shot with 35mm film at the War Memorial Opera house in San Francisco, California, and its brighter atmosphere is accentuated by not only the big interior environment of the opera house but also the operatic mood of the soundtrack. The 1998 part was shot with digital film at the Louise M. Davies Symphony Hall in San Francisco, California, and its smooth texture fits well to that clean simplicity of iMac and the subsequent Apple products, while Pemberton’s score switches back to the electronic mode with modern minimalistic style.

While apparently fictionalized a lot during its adaptation process, “Steve Jobs” is a compelling glimpse into Job’s life and career. Rather than monotonously droning on facts, the movie is really curious about what makes him tick, and Boyle, Sorkin, and Fassbender and the other main cast members did a superlative job here in this film. Jobs might be a prick, but, as reflected by the ending, he was a pretty smart and exciting one we could not help but watch, and the movie vividly reminds us of that feeling as we ask ourselves on one thing. He did change our world, but is it better or worse for us? We will soon see, probably.

stevejobs05

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

The Big Short (2015) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4) : Big Bets against the market

thebigshort01

Cheerfully bouncing around a number of traders who perceived an imminent financial disaster in advance, “The Big Short” gives us an absurd, biting account of how everything was virtually destined to be collapsed before the financial crisis of 2007-08 finally occurred in US. Watching how its main characters cleverly take advantage of the serious faults of their corrupt system, we cannot help but amused by how many others in the system are so oblivious to the approaching disaster on the horizon as driven by greed and stupidity, and then we are chilled by its enormous following economic consequences, which have been affecting not only US but also the whole global world.

In 2005 March, Michael Burry (Christian Bale), an ex-neurologist who has worked as the manager of a hedge fund company in California thanks to his deep interest and knowledge on financial business, thoroughly analyzes the current status of the US housing market, and he soon discovers that there is a really serious problem which will be far worse two years later according to his estimation. As explained during the prologue sequence, the introduction of mortgage-backed security (MBS) led to a new exciting financial business area for banks, and things looked fine and profitable for years as banks continued to sell MBS and other similar kinds of security, but now it is on the verge of collapse as it has depended more and more on high-risk subprime mortgages, which are inherently no more than worthless financial toxic waste.

This is surely a bad news, but Burry also finds an ironic silver lining in this gloomy prospect. Through credit default swap, which is technically financial insurance, he can bet against, or ‘short’ in financial business term, the market, and then he and his clients will profit a lot from that if the market is collapsed as he predicts. Thanks to his autonomous position in his company, he can go to New York by himself and make deals with several prominent investment banks including Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs, and the banks have no trouble with accepting Burry’s business proposal, mainly because they do not see any problem from the market unlike him and, above all, they are happy to get another opportunity of getting free money for them.

thebigshort02

In the meantime, some other few people also begin to discern what Burry sees from the market. After informed about one of Burry’s bank deals by coincidence, Jared Vennett (Ryan Gosling), a slick, confident trader working in Deutsche Bank, immediately realizes that there is indeed a big opportunity not many people have noticed yet. When a group of hedge fund managers led by Mark Baum (Steve Carell) come to learn about that through a misplaced call, Vennett makes a proposition to them, and, though they do not entirely trust him, they come to join Vennett’s private venture because they see a chance of working against the system they have disliked.

We also meet Charlie Geller (John Magaro) and Jamie Shipley (Finn Wittrock), two young amateur traders eager to get any breakthrough to push their modest business into the major league in New York. When they happen to come upon Vennett’s prospectus on one day, they cannot be possibly more excited about what it suggests, but, due to their lack of experiences in security trade, they need some help from a more experienced guy. When they call him for help, former trader Ben Rickert (Brad Pitt) reluctantly comes out of retirement to return to his old game, and Geller and Shipley soon come to learn and experience a lot under their mentor’s guidance while getting closer to their dream of getting richer.

Busily juggling all these elements along with many other things in the story, the screenplay by the director Adam McKay and his co-writer Charles Randolph, which is based on Michael Lewis’s nonfiction book “The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine”, keeps engaging us through its brisk, efficient narrative peppered with humor and intelligence. As giving amusing and informative interlude lectures at times for our basic understanding of financial business, the movie never loses its way amidst myriad details popping up here and there around the plot, and it trusts us enough to let us grasp the ongoing circumstances on the screen for ourselves. Although those tricky financial business terms such as collateralized debt obligation (CDO) are frequently mentioned in the film, we always get the clear idea of what is going on around its characters, and we are constantly involved in their business interactions.

thebigshort05

Like the funniest moments of McKay’s debut film “Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy” (2004) are based on the absurdities of real human behaviors, many hilarious moments in “The Big Short” come from its sharp, acerbic observation on the absurd human faults behind the financial crisis of 2007-8. As some of the main characters in the film look closer into the sobering reality of the US housing and financial markets, they cannot believe their eyes while realizing how the system is more rotten than they have ever imagined, and we get dark, bitter laughs while observing its virulent aspects along with them. Loan brokers are willing to allow anyone to get house loans regardless of their customers’ ability to pay back their mortgages, banks are glad to have more commodities to be packaged and then sold, credit rating agencies have no problem with giving higher credit ratings for their client banks which incidentally pay them for their rating services, and, as reflected by one brief scene, US Securities and Exchange Commission do not care about these fraudulent activities while indirectly associated with Wall Street financial companies. After all, nobody wants to ruin the fun as long as money keeps rolling into their hands, and one of the most pungent laughs in the film comes from how much they are willing to keep disregarding the immediate failure of their system even when it is pretty obvious right on the surface.

The movie also makes hard points as its main characters become more conscious of what is bound to happen sooner or later. While they are simply dealing with numbers in their financial plays, those numbers are going to devastate the life of millions of common people out there once all hell breaks loose, and there is one sad scene involved with a struggling poor family who will be one of countless victims of the US housing market collapse. When things begin to fall apart in the end around 2007, that dreadful sense of doom feels more palpable than ever to our trader heroes, and some of them are not very comfortable with the fact that they are going to benefit from this unprecedented financial crisis which shakes hard everyone around them. They naturally feel conflicted as watching its widening effects on the national economy as well as the global economy, but they also cannot let themselves go down like many others – especially when they have a very good option for their survival right in front of them.

thebigshort03While many of real-life people in Lewis’s nonfiction book are presented through their fictional counterparts with changed names, the characters in the film are imbued with vivid, distinguishable personalities, and the talented cast members of the film smoothly inhabit their respective roles. Christian Bale, who is recently Oscar-nominated for his good performance (the movie is also nominated in four other categories including Best Picture), is dependable as a brilliant but socially awkward man who adamantly sticks to his belief and principles despite the mounting pressure from his angry boss and investors who do not believe his dour prediction on the market, and I personally appreciated how well Bale embodies those notable behavioral patterns of Asperger’s syndrome glimpsed from his eccentric character. Ryan Gosling’s easy-going charm is countered well by Steve Carell’s intense presence, and Carell deftly moves back and forth between comedy and drama as his character reveals personal conflicts behind his righteous anger toward the system he and his colleagues belong to. In his humble supporting performance, Brad Pitt, who also participated in the production of the film, effectively complements his two younger co-actors John Magaro and Finn Wittrock, and several notable performers including Hamish Linklater, Rafe Spall, Jeremy Strong, Adepero Oduye, Marisa Tomei, Melissa Leo, Karen Gillan, and Tracy Letts are also solid as the minor supporting characters in the film while Margot Robbie, Anthony Bourdain, Selena Gomez, and Richard Thaler have each own little fun during their short cameo appearances.

There have been several good films and documentaries about the financial crisis of 2007-8 during recent years, and “The Big Short” is as scathing as “Inside Job” (2010) and “Margin Call” (2011) in its comic criticism against those dirty rotten Wall Street guys who were responsible for the crisis. While nearly all of them did not go to jail, they also got lots of bailout money from the US government for covering up their big mess (guess where that money came from), and, as told to us at the end of the film, their business is being continued as before without any serious reform in the system. Seriously, do they ever learn?

thebigshort06

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

The Revenant (2015) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): Grim, Grisly, and Grueling

therevenant01Grim, grisly, and grueling, “The Revenant” is determined to overpower you with its cold, stark beauty of vast wilderness as well as its gray, gloomy depiction of extreme human conditions. This brooding western tale of survival and revenge is a tough, exhausting experience to say the least, but what is accomplished on the screen is so vivid and visceral that we cannot help but stare at the screen even during some of its most intense moments which brutally test the weakness of human body as well as the strength of human will. The movie is indeed one of those ‘feel-bad’ films, but its big, bold, and ambitious gestures for greatness are something to watch even though it is not always successful in reaching out for its greatness.

Partially based on the novel of the same name by Michael Puncke, which is inspired by a real-life story during the early 19th century, the movie is about the plight of Hugh Glass (Leonardo DiCaprio), a hunter who is the guide for a bunch of pelt hunters led by Captain Andrew Henry (Domhnall Gleeson). When they are going through their another day in the vast wilderness region of South Dakota, Glass and others are suddenly attacked by a local Arikara tribe, and the cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki, who won two Oscars for his groundbreaking works in “Gravity” (2013) and “Birdman” (2014), did another superb job worthy of his latest Oscar nomination. As his camera vividly and continuously captures the acts of bloody savagery during this striking sequence, the gruesome finality of this pandemonium comes upon everyone on the spot, and there are several stupendous visual moments to strike us hard – and that is merely the start, by the way.

Glass, his son Hawk (Forrest Goodluck), and some of the group members including Captain Henry and John Fitzgerald (Tom Hardy) manage to escape by one of their rafts on the river, but they cannot continue their journey along the river, for they will be susceptible to more attacks from the tribe who is still pursuing them. Following Glass’s advice, Captain Henry decides to take a land route instead for safety, but there soon comes a big trouble. Glass happens to come across two bear cubs in the forest, and, as soon as he senses his imminent danger, he is attacked and then mauled by the mother bear. Although it is well known that the bear in the film is CGI, its savage attack on Glass feels quite real and intense on the screen, and its sheer intensity is more than enough for you to forget those mean (but amusing) jokes about the bear and Leonardo DiCaprio, who looks convincingly scared and frantic as Glass’s body is mercilessly brutalized by the bear.

Glass manages to survive this disastrous encounter, but he is badly injured all over his body while nearly being unconscious. Because Glass’s condition is getting worse with no sign of recovery, he is eventually left with Hawk, Fitzgerald, and a young guy named Bridger (Will Poulter), who are going to stay with Glass until he dies and then will follow after their party once they bury Glass’s body properly in the ground.

therevenant04Unfortunately, another bad incident follows shortly after Captain Henry and others leave behind these four guys. Hawk is killed by Fitzgerald, and that happens right in front of Glass, who is still helpless and speechless under his deteriorating condition. After hiding Hawk’s body, Fitzgerald lies to Bridger, and Bridger, who was not around there when the killing occurred, comes to help Fitzgerald burying Glass alive in the ground. He later realizes Fitzgerald deceived him, but there is nothing he can really do except regretting over his misjudgment and following Fitzgerald’s demands.

Meanwhile, Glass remains alive somehow, and he is determined to survive by any means necessary for his vengeance on Fitzgerald. Although he is alone in the middle of the wilderness, there is still a chance of survival for him because he can move now despite his barely recovered condition, so that is the beginning of his dirty, difficult, and desperate journey to an army barrack where he and others were heading to.

The director Alejandro González Iñárritu, who wrote the screenplay with his co-writer Mark L. Smith, pushed his filmmaking process into lots of challenges for thrusting us right into the cold, harsh nature environment encompassing the characters in his film. While the movie was shot around the various remote locations in Canada and Argentina, his crew and actors had to endure numerous challenging conditions on the locations, and their arduous efforts do show during many highlight moments in their film. As closely following Glass’s continuous plights through his dexterous camera work, Lubezki, who depended only on natural lights during the shooting, continues to amaze us with astonishingly flexible unbroken shots, and many of nature landscape shots in the film are imbued with barren visual poetry as reminiscent of the best works of Terrence Malick, with whom Lubezki has frequently collaborated during recent years. The production design by Jack Fisk is plainly authentic as contributing more gloom and grime to the bleak ambience of the film, and it is further accentuated by the atmospheric score by Ryuichi Sakamoto, Alva Noto, and Brian Dessner.

Willingly hurling himself into a number of physically demanding scenes including the one involved with the carcass of a dead horse, DiCaprio gives a stoic but propulsive performance which will probably receive an Oscar in the next month. As uncompromising as his full-throttle comic turn in “The Wolf of the Wall Street” (2013), he shows admirable commitment while fully embodying his character’s desolation and determination, and his physical acting effectively conveys to us Glass’s devastated state of mind, which is not only tormented by his son’s death but also haunted by the memories of his dead Native American wife.

therevenant02While Glass’s grueling quest for survival is the center of its story, the movie also pays attentions to other characters at times. We see some more difficulties Captain Henry and his men face before they finally arrive in the army barrack, which is a mere faint reminder of civilization in its dim, shabby appearance. We meet another group of hunters around the wilderness region, and we see more of Elk Dog (Duane Howard), the Arikara tribe’s stern leader driven by his personal motive. Most of the Native Indian characters in the film are more or less than hostile extras at the fringe of the story, but their hostility is depicted with some understanding on their position, and some of the bleakest scenes in the film remind us that their opponents are no better than them.

These parts provide more tension and substance to the story, but they also slow down its narrative pace during the second act which often stumbles or plods under its solemn overpowering gravitas, and I lost some of my patience around that point. Fortunately, the movie regains its momentum during the third act as it prepares the ground for the expected moment of the final confrontation, and it does not lose its control till the very end.

The supporting characters are less defined compared to Glass, but some of them are relatively more distinguishable even though nearly all of them look dirty and grimy like their lead actor. Tom Hardy, who is Oscar-nominated along with DiCaprio, brings nervous intensity into what could have been a thankless role, and one brief scene where Fitzgerald talks about a very unpleasant incident in the past gives us a small glimpse into what makes this seedy guy tick. Will Poulter and Forrest Goodluck are also fine in their respective sympathetic roles, and Domhnall Gleeson, who had a bountiful year with four different supporting performances including the one here in this film, brings the quiet sense of decency and authority to his character.

François Truffaut once said: “I demand that a film express either the joy of making cinema or the agony of making cinema. I am not at all interested in anything in between; I am not interested in all those films that do not pulse.” If Iñárritu’s previous film “Birdman”, a free-wheeling technical/artistic tour-de-force which garnered him three Oscars including Best Picture award, can be regarded as the former, “The Revenant”, an agonizing film which demanded a lot to its cast and crew, can be categorized as the latter, and Truffaut would probably enjoy watching these two opposite but equally impressive films together, which do pulse in each own way.

therevenant03

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments