Lady Macbeth (2016) ☆☆☆(3/4): A chilly period drama about one wicked lady

ladymacbeth01

Although it is not based on that Scottish play by William Shakespeare, “Lady Macbeth” is as mean, dark, chilly, and vicious as you can expect from its title. Based on Russian writer Nikolai Leskov’s 1865 novella “Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District”, the movie calmly observes its seemingly prim heroine’s gradual descent into evil, and we are disturbed and chilled as watching this frightening process with horrible fascination.

In the movie, the background of the story is changed from Russia to Scotland, and the opening scene shows the wedding of a 17-year-old girl named Katherine (Florence Pugh) and her husband Alexander (Paul Hilton), who is the son of a wealthy landowner in some rural area of Scotland. Alexander’s father Boris (Christopher Fairbank) virtually bought Katherine for getting a male heir to succeed his son, but Alexander does not have much interest in her from the beginning. During their wedding night, he does not hide his apathy toward her at all, and that is just the beginning of what she has to endure.

As days slowly pass by in the house, Katherine silently struggles with her growing ennui and loneliness. Besides her and her husband and father-in-law, there is not anyone else in the house except a few employees including Anna (Naomi Ackie), a young black woman who works as Katherine’s personal maid and is probably the only one close to her in the house.

Katherine’s seemingly endless predicament is further emphasized by the stark atmosphere hanging around the house and its surrounding area, which is established well on the screen thanks to cinematographer Ari Wegner. Constantly shrouded in a grey moody tone, the outdoor scenes in the movie often feel oppressive and ominous, and the interior of the house is always filled with the barren sense of emptiness as Katherine aimlessly ambles around the house. Via static, precise scene compositions, many key scenes in the film effectively reflect the frustration and suffocation inside her, and the movie indirectly makes a succinct point on how women during that period were restricted by their male-dominant world.

ladymacbeth04

On one day, there comes an opportunity to ventilate whatever has been accumulated inside Katherine. Not long after both her husband and her father-in-law leave the house for their respective matters to handle, she happens to encounter a young handsome black farmhand named Sebastian (Cosmo Jarvis), and she finds herself attracted to him. When he boldly comes into her bedroom later at night, she is frightened at first, but then she instantly plunges herself into her desire, and they come to spend more nights together as she wants more and more from him.

Of course, this transgression of hers does not remain hidden for a long time, and Katherine comes to decide that she must do something about that. I will not go into details here, but I can tell you instead that I appreciate the lean, economic storytelling of the adapted screenplay by Alice Birch. I particularly like how one brief scene involved with a certain type of mushroom leads to the sudden shocking situation unfolded during a later scene, and the movie wisely lets us deduce the connection between these two scenes.

Director William Oldroyd, who previously made several short films before making his first feature film here, firmly sticks to his austere approach while subtly increasing the level of nervousness on the screen. As Katherine keeps going for her desire, she becomes more determined to eliminate anything to block her way, and we are unnerved more by her emerging evil – especially after a couple of crucial supporting characters come to the house later in the story.

ladymacbeth05

Katherine is indeed a monstrous woman, but she is also a captivating character to watch mainly because of the terrific lead performance by Florence Pugh. Although the movie is only the second feature film in the burgeoning career of this 21-year-old British actress, Pugh exudes her own natural presence as ably carrying the film, and she is superlative as deftly suggesting the dark emotional undercurrents swirling beneath her character’s increasingly cold façade. Although the movie does not tell a lot about Katherine’s life before her marriage, Pugh lets us understand her character’s dark human desire, and that is why we feel some sympathy toward Katherine even while we are horrified by how ruthless and diabolical she can be.

In case of the other performers in the movie, they are understandably less prominent than Pugh, but they are solid in their respective functional roles. While Cosmo Jarvis embodies well his character’s rugged sensuality, Christopher Fairbank and Paul Hilton are suitably loathsome, and the special mention goes to Naomi Ackie, who is heartbreaking especially when her character is irrevocably devastated by one of Katherine’s harmful actions at one point.

“Lady Macbeth” is surely a cold, unpleasant film, and some of you may cringe during its darkest moments like my mother did during the screening she attended with me. Nevertheless, the movie is worthwhile to watch for Pugh’s unforgettable performance, and I still marvel at how confidently and masterfully she handles her final scenes without a blink. She seems to signify nothing in her detached face, but we can sense the price Katherine comes to pay for her desire, and that is all the movie needs for leaving us with a chilling impression in the end.

ladymacbeth06.png

Posted in Movies | Tagged | 1 Comment

The Sense of an Ending (2017) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4): How he remembers – and what really happened

thesenseofanending01

“The Sense of an Ending” curiously feels lukewarm and distant. Although this is a technically well-made drama film equipped with a handful of good performances, the movie simply moves from one narrative point to another while not generating enough emotional momentum for us, and we only come to observe its main characters from the distance without caring much about them. When an old mystery inside the story is finally fully revealed, there is not much surprise for us, and the eventual ending only gives us the mild sense of a closure while lacking emotional resonance to linger on us.

Jim Broadbent plays Anthony ‘Tony’ Webber, an old divorcé running a small camera shop in London. The early part of the movie shows us how stable and routine his daily life is; he wakes up early in the morning and then starts his another day with a cup of hot coffee, and most of his daytime is spent at his camera shop, which does not have many customers but mostly looks neat with Leica cameras and other high-quality cameras in display.

He has been accustomed to living alone, but then there come two different changes into his life. One comes from his pregnant daughter Susie (Michelle Dockery), who is about to give a birth to her baby and needs some help from her father whenever her mother Margaret (Harriet Walter) is too busy to be available. Although their relationship was over a long time ago, Tony and Margaret have been amiable to each other like good friends, and Tony is certainly willing to help his daughter, as reflected by one amusing scene where he accompanies her in a class for pregnant women.

The other one comes from a letter sent by someone he knew around 40 years ago. It is from the mother of his old lover Veronica (Charlotte Rampling), who bequeathed the diary of his close friend and a small sum of money to him shortly before her recent death. Perplexed by this, Tony tries to contact Veronica for receiving the diary, but he is only notified by her family lawyer that she refuses to see him – and she does not even send that diary to him despite her dead mother’s request.

thesenseofanending02

As Tony wonders why Veronica chooses to stay away from him, his mind naturally goes back to when they were young, and the movie accordingly goes back and forth between present and past. He often reflects on his past while Margaret patiently listens to him, and we get a series of flashback scenes showing young Tony (Billy Howle), young Veronica (Freya Mavor), and Adrian Finn (Joe Alwyn), who was the owner of that diary.

Tony remembers well when he encountered Veronica for the first time. When they came across each other at a night party, they were instantly drawn to each other, and he soon found himself visiting her family house along with her. Everyone including Veronica’s mother was nice to him, and it looked like he and Veronica could move onto the next step of their relationship as they left her family house.

However, as Tony remembers more of the past between him and Veronica, we come to learn that things became somehow complicated later. Not long after Tony and Veronica came back from her family house, Adrian happened to get involved with Veronica, and it is revealed later that Adrian and Veronica’s relationship ended quite badly for some reason.

The screenplay by Nick Payne, which is based on the Man Booker Prize-winning novel of the same name by Julian Barnes, maintains its level of intrigue to some degrees at least during its first two acts, and the director Ritesh Batra, who previously made “The Lunchbox” (2013), did a competent job of establishing two different moods for the story. While the flashback scenes in the movie feel warm and gentle with a bit of haziness as nostalgic pieces of memories, the scenes set in the present part are usually accompanied with gray melancholy, and this contrast further accentuates the feeling of loss and regret in the present part.

thesenseofanending03

However, the movie keeps sticking to its reserved attitude even after Tony comes to realize how unreliable his memory is during the third act. Although what happened among Tony, Veronica, and Adrian is devastating indeed, the movie remains to be mild and detached as before, and it is disappointing to see how its story fizzles in the end without much dramatic impact.

Anyway, the movie is still watchable mainly thanks to its good main cast members. Jim Broadbent, who has been always reliable in many different movies ranging from “Iris” (2001) to “Big Game” (2014), is perfectly cast as an ordinary old guy who comes to face what he has deliberately overlooked for many years, and the other performers in the movie are also solid in their respective roles. While Billy Howle, Freya Mavor, and Joe Alwyn bring youthfulness to their scenes as required, Emily Mortimer is saucy and alluring in her brief appearance, and Harriet Walter and Charlotte Rampling are fine in their respective conversation scenes with Broadbent.

I do not like “The Sense of an Ending” enough to recommend it to you, but the movie is not without appeal, considering what I observed during a screening I attended this Saturday afternoon. The screening room was packed with audiences, and they seemed satisfied with the movie as they walked out of the screening room along with me. In case of me, I just wanted to check out Barnes’ novel someday, and that was all.

thesenseofanending04

Posted in Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment

Annabelle: Creation (2017) ☆☆☆(3/4): That damn possessed doll

annabellecreation03

“Annabelle: Creation” is as scary as predicted while a bit better than expected. While we are surely served with many things you can expect from a horror flick featuring a malicious possessed doll and a creaky old house, the movie skillfully sets its stage and then hurls a good number of effective moments to jolt and scare us, and we gladly go along with that during its 109-minute running time.

As many of you know, the movie is the prequel to “Annabelle” (2014), which was inspired by that damn creepy doll which briefly appeared in “The Conjuring” (2013). While I did not watch “Annabelle” mainly because it did not get many positive reviews when it was released in 2014 (its current score in Rotten Tomatoes is 29%), that was not much of a problem when I watched “Annabelle: Creation” because, as reflected by its very title, the movie is about the origin of that doll.

After the opening sequence which shows how that doll was made, the movie moves forward to when six young orphan girls go to a house located in some remote area while accompanied with Sister Charlotte (Stephanie Sigman). For an unspecified reason, the girls had to leave their orphanage, but they are happy to see that their new place looks better than expected, and it seems everything will be fine for them.

Of course, we already know that the house is not a good place. Mr. Mullins, the owner of the house, (Anthony LaPaglia) is a mild, courteous guy who sincerely wants his house to be filled with liveliness through the new residents of his house, but, as shown from the opening sequence, he and his wife Esther (Miranda Otto) suffered a terrible tragedy 12 years ago, and that still seems to be affecting him and his wife, who never gets out of her bedroom for some health reason while occasionally calling for her husband via her small bell.

annabellecreation01

In addition, there is a mysterious room on the second floor. Mr. Mullins forbids the girls to enter this room, but we clear see from the beginning that someone is bound to enter the room sooner or later, and that is a disabled girl named Janice (Talitha Bateman). As she tries to sleep during the first night at the house, she hears strange sounds outside her bedroom which she shares with her best friend Linda (Lulu Wilson). She soon finds herself being led to that forbidden room, and then….

While it is not much of a spoiler to tell you that 1) she eventually enters the room, 2) she encounters our creepy doll which has probably been waiting for her right from when she and other girls entered the house, and 3) not only she but also other characters become more aware of something wicked inside the house, the movie constantly entertains us as deftly playing with our expectation. It does not hide its intention to scare us at all from the start, so we always know when we should be ready to be scared as the camera stares at dark spaces or odd sounds are heard on the soundtrack, and we usually get good shocks or surprises for us.

I will not go into details for not spoiling your entertainment, but I guess I can talk about several enjoyable elements worthwhile to mention. While door is certainly one of the most clichéd tools in horror genre, the movie has a good scene in which a certain hidden door repeatedly moves by itself, and I was both amused and chilled as observing that moment. I liked an early scene where the camera fluidly moves around inside the house for giving us the overall presentation of the interior environment of the house, and I was certainly delighted to see an equipment installed along the staircase, which did not disappoint me during one particular scene later in the film. I also enjoyed the nice creepy details of that forbidden room, and I was entertained by how one familiar song is utilized well for generating cheerful sinisterness around the screen.

annabellecreation02

The movie is the second feature film directed by David F. Sandberg, a Swedish filmmaker who previously made his debut feature film “Lights Out” (2016). He drew considerable attention via a bunch of horror short films including the one which eventually became the basis of his debut feature film, and, as far as I could see from “Annabelle: Creation”, he is a competent director who knows how to set the mood for good scary scenes. He and his cinematographer Maxime Alexandre dexterously handle light and darkness during several visually impressive scenes in the film, and I especially like the one involved with a few light bulbs. The sound effects are effectively used whenever the movie needs to dial up its level of creepiness, and it is often unnerving to hear the sound of that bell belonging to Mrs. Mullins.

The movie is not entirely without weak aspects. Although the performers in the movie did as much as they could for filling their respective roles, their characters remain to be no more than mere archetypes to be targeted by an unknown evil force. While the movie surely goes all the way for scaring us more during its third act, not all of its attempts are successful, and the following epilogue part is perfunctory while merely providing an obligatory connection to “Annabelle”.

Anyway, “Annabelle: Creation” mostly succeeds in what it intends to do, and I guess I can be a little flexible in my inconsequential star rating. While it is not better than “The Conjuring” and its 2016 sequel (I gave both of them 2.5 stars, by the way), it is an unexpected fun which entertained me enough, so I give it three stars with some grumble.

annabellecreation04

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Graduation (2016) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): For his daughter’s future

graduation03

Romanian film “Graduation” is a brilliant moral drama which calmly and incisively delves into not only its ordinary hero’s complex moral circumstance but also a glum, corrupt society surrounding him and others. He simply wants to do what he thinks is best for his dear daughter’s future, but then he comes to cross lines like many other people around him usually do, and the movie engrosses us as steadily observing the slow but inevitable progress of the following consequence of his choice.

During the early part of the movie, we get to know a bit about its hero and his family. Romeo Aldea (Adrian Titieni) is a middle-aged physician living in a city located in the northwestern region of Romania, and it seems he has been modestly successful in his professional career, but he has not been that happy with his life. There was a time when he and his wife Magda (Lia Bugnar) were young and hopeful as Nicolae Ceaușescu’s communist regime collapsed in 1989, but now they become jaded realists casually going through their mundane daily life, and it is apparent from their interactions that there is not much love left between them. Usually looking moody and depressed, Magda spends most of her time in their shabby apartment unless she goes out for working in a local library, and Romeo turns out to be in an extramarital relationship with a younger woman named Sandra (Mălina Manovici), who has recently been very frustrated as their relationship is going nowhere.

We gradually come to sense that Romeo and Magda have maintained their loveless marriage mainly for their adolescent daughter Eliza (Maria Drăguș). Both of them want Eliza to have a better chance for her life, and it is not so exaggerating to say that Romeo has had vicarious satisfaction from his daughter for years. He and his wife have strenuously prepared their daughter for the enrollment in some prestigious university in London, and now she is about to go through the final step of her parents’ plan. In the upcoming graduation examination, she must attain high test scores for getting a scholarship for her education in London, and she is ready for that task even though she looks less enthusiastic about her future in London than her father.

graduation04

However, an unexpected incident happens to Eliza, and it seriously threatens what her and her parents have built up for years. Not long after Romeo takes her to her school by his car, she is suddenly assaulted by some unknown guy at a nearby construction site while walking alone to her school, and her parents are naturally shocked by this terrible incident while also wondering whether their daughter is in a right condition for her upcoming examination. Although it is fortunate that she only suffers a minor physical injury during the assault, she is apparently traumatized by the incident, and that means she will likely get lower test scores than demanded. Maybe she should postpone her examination, but then it will be too late for getting that scholarship, so Romeo and his wife find themselves helplessly stuck in their dilemma as pondering over what they should do for their daughter.

And that is when Romeo begins to be tempted to get some backdoor help for ensuring his daughter’s high test scores. Through a police chief close to him, he meets a few people who can pull some strings for what he wants, and, of course, he is asked to do something unethical in exchange. When she hears about that from her husband, Magda objects to that, but Romeo has already made a decision. While he has been proud of his moral integrity, he cannot resist this shady opportunity because of his daughter, so he eventually compromises his principles as justifying his unethical action.

Maintaining its non-judgmental viewpoint, the movie slowly accumulates tension on the screen while its hero’s life is gradually imploded as if it were a sort of karmic consequence. After Romeo tells his daughter about a little thing she must do during the examination, he and his daughter become distant to each other, and that inevitably influences his relationship with Magda, who has put up with many things but now comes to decide that enough is enough. In addition, he later finds himself in another serious trouble due to that unethical action of his, and that may ruin not only his life but also his daughter’s.

graduation06

As he did in his previous films “4 Months, 3 Weeks, and 2 Days” (2007) and “Beyond the Hills” (2012), director/writer Cristian Mungiu, who received the Best Director Award at the Cannes Film Festival in last year (he shared it with Olivier Assayas for his film “Personal Shopper” (2016), by the way), firmly sticks to his own dry, stark visual approach while deftly handling his story and characters. Many scenes in the film are presented via continuous single shots, and cinematographer Tudor Vladimir Panduru’s handheld camera is steady while often making judicious movements for subtle but impactful dramatic effects. The characters in the movie are realistically depicted with recognizable human nuances, and we accordingly get immersed into their world as becoming more involved in its hero’s circumstance.

The performers in the movie are all effortless in their natural performances. While Adrian Titieni did a masterful job as a man who slowly sinks into his moral quagmire, Maria Drăguș, who played one of key characters in Michael Haneke’s “The White Ribbon” (2009) is equally terrific in her role, and she and Titieni are particularly excellent during one quiet but tense conversation scene which totally depends on their acting. Lia Bugnar and Mălina Manovici are also fine in their respective supporting roles, and so is Vlad Ivanov, who played that horrible abortionist in “4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days”.

Overall, “Graduation”, which is released in South Korea as “Eliza’s Tomorrow” is a compelling drama supported well by its top-notch direction and acting. Its story and characters are specific, but its main characters’ human matters feel quite universal nonetheless, and its rather ambiguous but nearly perfect finale will linger on you for a while after it is over. This is one of better films I saw during this summer season, and I wholeheartedly recommend it without hesitation.

graduation02.jpg

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Burning Sands (2017) ☆☆☆(3/4): A hellish pledge week in one black campus

burningsands02

As far I as I can remember, my campus years in Korean Advanced Institute of Science and Technology were mostly uneventful. Unless I watched movies or read books, my mind was usually occupied with getting good grades by any means necessary, and I did not have much interest in hanging around with others. I did join a club later, but I still preferred to be alone while not giving a damn about others around me, and that tendency of mine still remains inside me although I have been relatively less antisocial these days.

While what is disturbingly shown from the small campus world of “Burning Sands” is quite different from my campus experience in numerous aspects, I observed its several intense moments with a sort of anthropological fascination. Desiring for the sense of belonging and identity, its hero and several young characters around him let themselves driven and abused by toxic ideas of masculinity as going through their unforgiving fraternity initiation process, and we cannot help but cringe as they are pushed further and further into the dark pit of brutality and apathy.

The movie begins with its hero’s voice-over as he and other pledges are going to somewhere outside their campus. Zurich (Trevor Jackson) is a student of some prestigious university for African Americans, and he and other pledges are about to take their very first step toward Lambda Lambda Phi fraternity, one of the prominent fraternity in their university, After they arrive at a certain remote spot as instructed, they are forced to do push-ups by a senior fraternity member, and one of them eventually gets dropped out of the process just because he shows some compassion to Zurich.

burningsands05.jpg

Of course, this is a mere beginning for more acts of punishment and humiliation, and senior fraternity members are ready to grab any excuse for bullying their pledges. For instance, when Zurich and other pledges make a minor mistake in delivering booze to the fraternity house, it initially seems that mistake will be forgiven as everyone in the house enjoys the party, but then, not so surprisingly, there comes a cruel moment of punishment in the basement, and Zurich and other junior candidates have no choice but to endure this until their seniors are satisfied enough.

Because it will probably be all right once they pass through their first week which will culminate to a big ritual to be held during the upcoming Saturday night, Zurich and other pledges try to harden themselves, but the situation often becomes almost unbearable as they manage to move from one ritual to another together. Although there is a senior member who is a little more generous than other senior members, he only prevents other seniors members from going too far from time to time, and it looks like that is all he can do, even though it is clear that he does not like what he and other senior members do to Zurich and other pledges.

Maybe they can just quit, but Zurich and other pledges are pressured by not only current fraternity members but also former ones. Individually sponsored by some of those former fraternity members, they certainly do not want to fail in what they are expected to do, and their sponsors surely have lots of expectation on them. In case of Zurich, his sponsor is none other than the dean of the university, and we are not so surprised when Zurich comes to learn how much the dean is willing to turn a blind eye on what is going inside his beloved fraternity.

burningsands04

Meanwhile, Zurich finds himself becoming more distant to others who really care about him. His father, who once tried but failed in the same fraternity initiation when he studied in his son’s university many years ago, wants to talk more with his son, but Zurich keeps distancing himself from his father probably because his father’s old failure reminds him that he can also fail anytime. Zurich’s girlfriend begins to worry more about Zurich as he suffers more punishment and humiliation from the fraternity, but then there comes a point when she decides that she can no longer continue her relationship with him. In case of Professor Hughes (Alfre Woodard), she seems to sense something wrong from Zurich, but there is not much she can do as he chooses to remain silent about what he and other pledges are coerced to do.

The screenplay by director Gerard McMurray and his co-writer Christian T. Berg is predictable in its progress toward its eventual arrival point, and many of its supporting characters are rather underdeveloped, but the movie compensates for these weak aspects as constantly sustaining the level of uneasy tension on the screen. When Zurich and his fellow pledges eventually come to confront that dreaded ritual of Saturday night, the movie pulls no punch at all as vividly and frighteningly presenting their sheer pain and humiliation in front of senior fraternity members, and then there comes an inevitable moment as we have worried from the beginning.

Shortly before writing this review, I came across a New York Times article on one unfortunate case of fraternity hazing, and I must tell you that what is described in that article chillingly resonates with what I observed from “Burning Sands”. While not wholly satisfying in several aspects, the movie still works as an intense, biting experience on the whole, and it will certainly give you some valuable insights on its dark subject.

burningsands03

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Coin Heist (2017) ☆☆☆(3/4): A small heist for saving their school

coinheist01

“Coin Heist”, which has been available on Netflix since this early January, is a modest but interesting heist film with a touch of “The Breakfast Club” (1985). As a movie about a group of high school kids trying to steal a heap of coins from the US Mint, the movie surely feels cheerful at times while these smart kids prepare for their well-intentioned criminal plan step by step, but it also shows some seriousness as thoughtfully observing their personal aspects, and it mostly balances itself well between character drama and genre conventions.

The early part of the movie is about a sudden situation which turns its main characters’ world upside down. They are students of some prestigious private high school, and the opening scene shows them and other students having a field trip at a building belonging to the US Mint while accompanied with their art design teacher and the principle of the school. In the middle of this field trip, a couple of police officers suddenly come upon them, and everyone is perplexed as the principal is promptly arrested in front of them.

It is soon revealed that the principal is arrested for embezzling no less than 10 million dollar from the school fund, and the resulting financial crisis leads to lots of changes inside the school. While almost all of student activities outside their classes are discarded, the upcoming prom party is also going to be downsized in a considerable degree, and Dakota (Sasha Pieterse) has to tell this bad news to her fellow students as the student president of the school, even though she knows well that they are not going to be pleased about that.

In case of Jason (Alex Saxon), things are more awkward for him mainly because he is the son of the principle. While his reputation in the school has not been very good from the beginning, he feels embarrassed especially after hearing that his father comes to accept plea bargain, and every day in his school painfully reminds him of the undeniable damage caused by his father’s criminal deed.

coinheist02

When Alice (Alexis G. Zall), a clever hacker girl in the school, suggests to him a rather risky heist plan for saving the school from possible bankruptcy, Jason rejects it at first, but he comes to believe that this can be a nice solution for him as well as many other students in the school. Sure, he and Alice will definitely go to jail for that if they are not very careful, but they really want to save their school, and they are willing to take the risk for that.

Their target is none other than that building of the US Mint, and the plan is pretty simple on the surface. After Alice does some hacking job on the surveillance system in the building, they will sneak into the building for producing a heap of faulty coins which can be sold at a high price as collectible items, and all they will have to do after getting out of the building successfully with those faulty coins is selling them as soon as possible for getting enough money for their school.

As they embark on their plan which still needs to be polished further, Alice and Jason are joined by two other students. Feeling suffocated by how she always presents herself as a model student to others around her, Dakota agrees to help Alice and Jason when she happens to learn about their plan, and she provides considerable help when they need to prepare for several things before their planned break-in. Utilizing her usual confident attitude well, Dakota successfully disguises herself as an eager college newspaper reporter in front of an official working in their target building, and we are served with a nice sequence as she and her fellow accomplices smoothly work together while managing to evade any possible suspicion.

The fourth member of this group is an African American student named Benny (Jay Walker), who wants to be an engineer someday and surely has lots of talent for accomplishing his dream. He is initially reluctant when he is asked to provide some technical help, but then he comes to join the group after learning that his scholarship is going to be cut off, and we see him doing a skillful job for a template for faulty coins, which is the core element in their plan.

coinheist04

Of course, there comes a series of setbacks during the middle part of the movie, and most of them come from the conflicts among its main characters. While Jason and Alice get closer to each other as spending time more with other, Dakota and Benny also find themselves attracted to each other, but then, as being not so sure about what they feel, they all come to confront a considerable gap among them, and that almost topples what they have managed to build up together.

While clearly reminiscent of “The Breakfast Club” and other films by John Hughes, director Emily Hagins’ screenplay, which is based on a novel by Elisa Ludwig, stumbles a bit during this rather predictable part, but its main characters and their relationships remain real and believable as before, and it surely helps that the young main cast members in the movie are engaging to watch as bringing some life and depth to their seemingly stereotype characters. As the movie eventually enters its third act, everything in the story is gathered together to generate a certain degree of suspense as demanded, and I like how it sidesteps some of its genre conventions via its rather anti-climactic finale.

“Coin Heist” is the fifth feature film directed by Hagins, a 24-year-old filmmaker who made her first feature film “Pathogen” (2006) when she was only 14 years old. I have not watched any of her previous works, but, as far as I can see from “Coin Heist”, she is a good filmmaker who knows how to interest and engage the audiences via good story and characters, and I sincerely hope that she will keep moving onto next promising steps of her career.

coinheist03

 

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Autopsy of Jane Doe (2016) ☆☆☆(3/4): The autopsy of one spooky corpse

theautopsyofjanedoe02

“The Autopsy of Jane Doe” is as spooky as its very title suggests. Its story premise is pretty simple to say the least, but it is enjoyable to watch how the movie carefully accumulates the sense of dread around the screen as its two main characters literally delve deeper into a mysterious entity handed to them, and we come to brace ourselves more while fearing for whatever may happen to them in the end.

Its two main characters are Tommy Tilden (Brian Cox) and his son Austen (Emile Hirsch). Tommy is a small-town coroner, and Austen has worked as his father’s assistant for a couple of years. Although he does not like his job much as reflected by a brief conversation scene between him and his girlfriend, Austen still hesitates to leave his widower father and their home, and we see him dutifully assisting his father as they autopsy a burned body recently sent to their morgue located right below their house. As a well-experienced professional, Tommy is meticulous with small forensic details, and it does not take much time for him to deduce the rather suspicious cause of death from the body, though he does not care much about what exactly happened.

Not long after they finished this job during late evening, the town sheriff comes to the morgue. As shown from the opening scene of the movie, a terrible incident happened to one family living in the town, and, while quite perplexed by the peculiar aspects of the incident, the town sheriff and his deputies discover something very strange in the basement of that ill-fated family’s house. Inside a hole recently dug up in the ground of the basement, there is the body of a young unknown female, and they still cannot identify this dead woman despite the mostly intact condition of her body.

theautopsyofjanedoe03

Anyway, the sheriff wants to know the cause of her death as soon as possible at least, so he hands over the body to Tommy, and Tommy agrees to do an extra night job for the sheriff. Although he is supposed to go outside along with his girlfriend right after his work hour, Austen decides to help his father as usual. After all, this seems to be another routine job to be taken care of within around 2 hours, and his girlfriend respects his decision.

However, as they begin the first step of their autopsy on ‘Jane Doe’, Tommy and Austen notice how odd her body is in many aspects. While there is no visible sign of trauma on her skin, they find multiple bone fractures in her limbs, and they naturally wonder how the hell she sustained such serious injuries without any sign of physical harm on her body, which looks almost impeccable on the surface except 1) her rather thin waist which looks like another possible sign of physical harm and 2) her cloudy eyes which implies that she died far earlier than the overall condition of her body suggests.

Tommy simply regards these puzzling aspects as pieces of a fascinating forensic puzzle to be solved sooner or later, but then he and his son continue to discover more weird things as they keeps going on with their procedure. When they try to cut her chest open, her body turns out to be a lot more sanguine than expected, and then they come across more perplexing surprises when they look closer into her chest.

As they spend more time in their morgue alone with this increasingly disturbing body, Austen finds himself becoming quite nervous, and he notices more of how the atmosphere in the morgue feels creepier than before. Not long after they hear from their old radio that a sudden storm is coming, they are stuck in their morgue as electricity is suddenly cut off for no apparent reason, and it feels more like that something sinister is hanging around inside the morgue. Is it possible that ‘Jane Doe’ is actually quite alive as Austen suspects? If so, what can they possibly do about that?

theautopsyofjanedoe04

While toying with that dark possibility during its first half, the movie builds up its ominous atmosphere step by step. While I appreciated its nice variation of a certain genre cliché associated with cat, I enjoyed how it has a gory, morbid fun with Jane Doe’s anatomical details to be examined by Tommy and Austen, which will surely make some of you cringe for good reasons. The movie also shows a wry sense of dark humor at times, and I especially like an early scene where Tommy explains to Austen’s girlfriend about a little traditional object he always puts on the bodies stored in his morgue.

The screenplay by Ian Goldberg and Richard Naing is efficient in their economical storytelling. While we do not know a lot about Tommy and Austen, they are presented as engaging human characters via small, succinct details, and Brian Cox and Emile Hirsch are believable in their respective lead roles. As we watch their characters working together, their characters’ personal/professional relationship is organically established thanks to their good performance, and Cox and Hirsch have a nice scene when their characters are allowed to have a little personal moment between them later in the film.

The movie is directed by André Øvredal, who previously made “Trollhunter” (2010). While that film was an amusing fantasy movie coupled with mockumentary style, “The Autopsy of Jane Doe” is a chilly horror film, and I was entertained by how deftly the movie sustains creepiness and suspense during its shorting running time (86 minutes). This is a competent genre piece which succeeds as much as intended, and you will not disappointed if you are looking for a little scary fun.

theautopsyofjanedoe01

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Raw (2016) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): When she awakens to her carnal craving

raw01

Utterly disturbing and gruesome, French horror film “Raw” is definitely not for everyone. Since it was shown at the Cannes Film Festival early in last year, I have heard about how some audiences were quite disturbed or repulsed during its screenings, and now I can assure you that it is certainly one of the most uncomfortable movie experiences I had during this year. While I seriously doubt whether I will able to watch it again, I observed it with horrible fascination and dark amusement, and I admired many of its striking moments, which are still vividly remembered in my mind even at this point.

After its quiet but ominous opening scene unfolded on a remote road, the movie begins the story as its young heroine Justine (Garance Marillier) is about to start her first year at some prominent veterinary school where her parents graduated from. Her elder sister Alexia (Ella Rumpf) has already been there for a year, and Justine’s parents expect Alexia to support her younger sister well while Justine gets herself accustomed to her new environment.

Not long after Justine arrives at the school dormitory, the hazing week for freshmen is started, and she and other freshman students including her gay roommate Adrien (Rabah Naït Oufella) are forced to endure a series of cruel pranks and rituals by gleeful seniors including Alexia. At one point, Justine and other freshman students are suddenly gathered together in a corridor and then are demanded to crawl to their destination spot, and this and other cruel acts of hazing in the film reminded me that I was rather lucky during my first year in KAIST.

The situation seems tolerable to Justine as she manages to endure along with her fellow freshman students, but then there comes a point when she faces a very difficult challenge. After being showered with a bucketful of animal blood in a way reminiscent of “Carrie” (1976), she and other freshman students have to eat a raw piece of rabbit kidney, but Justine hesitates because she has been a strict vegetarian just like her parents. She naturally resists when her turn comes, but not even her own sister is on her side, and she is eventually coerced to eat rabbit kidney.

raw03

This carnivorous act of hers merely looks like a trivial minor transgression, but something begins to happen to her. On the next day, she suffers an inexplicable incident of skin problem, and then she finds herself craving for meat. At first, it is just a piece of cooked meat she attempts to steal at a school cafeteria, and then she comes to devour raw chicken during one night. She surely feels disgusted, but her urge keeps growing nonetheless, and there is a cringe-inducing moment as she vomits something inappropriate to eat into a toilet stool.

This alarming progress eventually comes to a tipping point when she and Alexia happen to spend one night together. After their crude attempt of Brazilian waxing on Justine’s pubic hair goes wrong, Alexia tries to handle this problem with a pair of scissors, but then an unfortunate accident happens, and that accident leads Justine to the discovery of the ultimate object of her craving: human flesh. Spiced a bit with wry dark humor, this disturbing scene is handled well with enough power and conviction on the screen, and we cannot help but watch it even while disgusted and horrified by Justine’s small but significant act of cannibalism.

Although the movie does not explain a lot, we gradually come to gather that Justine’s cannibalistic tendency is based on genetic factors. Not so surprisingly, her sister turns out to harbor the same tendency behind her back, and we get to know a bit about how she has managed her own craving, as she gives her sister one hell of bloody example. In case of their loving parents, it is later revealed that they found a way to maintain their married life, and that is surely another nice dark touch to be appreciated in the film.

raw05

Meanwhile, the movie continues to observe Justine and other freshman students’ ongoing hazing week. Figuratively and literally delving more into matters of flesh and blood during their classes, they endure more hazing from seniors, and this puts more stress into Justine’s agitated mind as she struggles more with her newfound instinct which is further fueled by her first taste of human flesh. We subsequently get a darkly amusing scene where she cannot help but look intensively at Adrien from the distance, who certainly looks desirable (and tasty) to her because of his good-looking body.

The movie is directed by Julian Ducournau, who received the Petit Rail d’Or award at the Cannes Film Festival for her short film “Junior” (2011). While this is her first feature film, she demonstrates here a dexterous control of mood and style, and I was especially impressed by the raw emotional horror pulsating below the polished texture of her movie. Thanks to the nervous score by Jim Williams and the meticulous cinematography by Ruben Impens, the movie is constantly filled with nervous vibe even when nothing much seems to be happening on the screen, and Garance Marillier is natural and captivating in every disturbing step her character takes along the plot. She and her co-star Ella Rumpf did a commendable job of vividly conveying to us the tumultuous relationship dynamic between their characters, and Rabah Naït Oufella, Laurent Lucas, and Joana Preiss are also solid in their respective roles.

While it may be too unpleasant for some of you, I recommend “Raw” for not only its technical achievement but also the deft handling of its main subjects. This is a twisted coming-of-age drama willing to disturb and challenge its audiences, and you may appreciate that aspect as much as me once you accept what it intends to do. Anyway, please don’t tell me I did not warn you in advance.

raw02

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

The Girl with All the Gifts (2016) ☆☆☆(3/4): The girl with special hunger

thegirlwithallthegifts01

Zombie apocalypse flicks are dime a dozen these days, but “The Girl with All the Gifts” injects some fresh new elements into its genre. While we get heaps of rotting zombies as usual, the movie intrigues and engages us via its interesting story premise, and it is also surprisingly thought-provoking at times as following the gradual awakening of its young heroine to her exceptional position in an apocalyptic world.

When we meet Melanie (Sennia Nanua) during the opening scene, she simply seems to be a bright, polite young girl, and the same thing can be said about a bunch of kids with whom she lived in their isolated place for several years. Although their living environment is not exactly cheery, they happily follow their daily routine without any complaint, and their favorite time is when they study and learn under the guidance of Miss Justineau (Gemma Arterton).

However, from the beginning, we notice how constantly these kids are guarded day and night. Each of them is confined in their respective cells, and soldiers guarding them are always watchful especially when Melanie and other kids are taken out of their cells. The kids’ bodies are tightly strapped to wheelchairs, and we later learn that soldiers and other adults including Justineau always apply some special cream to their body whenever they need to be around Melanie and other kids.

thegirlwithallthegifts02

The reason for these extremely careful measures is soon revealed to us when Sergeant Parks (Paddy Considine) deliberately ignites a dangerous instinct inside Melanie and other kids. During a massive zombie outbreak caused by some virulent fungus strain several years ago, they were infected while they were still in their mothers’ womb, but they did not turn into rotting zombies like other infected people because a sort of symbiosis between the fungus strain and their bodies. While they can think and learn like any normal people, they still have a powerful urge to eat fresh meet and blood, and the movie has a rather amusing moment involved with their special protein source (Hint: it is not meat).

While Justineau has been quite sympathetic to Melanie and other kids, Dr. Caldwell (Glenn Close) thinks otherwise. To Caldwell, Melanie and other kids are simply a possible key to the survival of the entire human race, and she is willing to do anything for her project, which, according to her, is almost close to the success she has yearned for years. With her benign but determined attitude, Close embodies well her character’s understandable position, and that will make you wonder about how much we can justify ourselves in the name of survival.

When Melanie is about to become Caldwell’s latest experiment subject, there comes a sudden massive zombie attack, and Melanie soon finds herself accompanying a few survivors including Justineau, Parks, and Caldwell. As searching for any possible way to get to another safe place, they eventually come into London, and we soon behold streets and alleys strewn with zombies, which can remain dormant as long as Melanie and her accompanists carefully move around them without any serious disturbance.

thegirlwithallthegifts03

Now you may think the movie becomes another typical zombie movie, but director Colm McCarthy and his screenplay writer M.R. Carey provide enough fun and surprise to hold our interest. I will not go into details for not spoiling your entertainment, but I can tell you that I was impressed by one particular sight of horrible wonder which Melanie and other characters come across in the middle of the story, and I must confess that, as a guy with a PhD degree in biological science, I was amused a lot by the name of a certain big vehicle which appears later in the movie.

While Melanie experiences more of her apocalyptic world, Carey’s screenplay, which is based on his novel, smoothly goes back and forth between horror and poignancy. It is touching to see her feeling more freedom than before, but then we are constantly reminded of her dark nature. Sure, she sincerely wants to do right things, but she cannot help herself at times as shown from one brief gruesome moment involved with one unlucky animal, and there is always the tension between her and other main characters in the film.

Imbueing her character with innocence and intelligence, newcomer Sennia Nanua gives a confident lead performance. She is especially good during one certain scene which may remind you of that famous classic novel by William Golding, and that dramatic scene totally works thanks to her strong, convincing acting although it looks a bit silly on the surface. The other main cast members of the movie are believable as effectively supporting Nanua’s performance; while Close is surely prominent in her shady role, Paddy Considine brings some human nuances to his character, and Gemma Arterton is also fine in her sympathetic role.

As I told you several times before, I have been tired of zombie movies, but I do appreciate clever ones whenever I come across them, and “The Girl with All the Gifts” definitely belongs to that category. Besides having several well-made scenes, the movie has a compelling heroine to watch, and it did a good job of making us involved in her dark coming-of-age drama. Overall, this is an enjoyable genre piece, and you may like it even if you are not particularly fond of zombie movies.

thegirlwithallthegifts04

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House (2016) ☆☆☆(3/4): Steady creepiness

Iamtheprettythingthatlivesinthehouse01

“I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House” is a steady exercise in creepiness. After establishing its small, sparse setting, the movie patiently dials up the level of tension bit by bit as its ill-fated heroine is slowly pushed toward its eventual finale, and I like how it maintains well its quiet but creepy atmosphere as adamantly sticking to its glacial narrative pacing. Although I felt impatient from time to time during my viewing and I was also a little disappointed with its anti-climactic ending, the movie works in terms of mood and style at least, and I admire that aspect to some degrees.

After the ominous opening sequence accompanied with the phlegmatic narration by a young live-in nurse named Lily Saylor (Ruth Wilson), we see her beginning her first day in a big 19th New England house belonging to an old writer named Iris Blum (Paula Prentiss). Due to her deteriorating health condition, Blum needs someone to take care of her in the house, and the job seems to look easy at first. There is no one in the house besides Blum and Lily, and Blum is usually in her bedroom without much demand.

During her prime period, Blum wrote a good number of horror novels which are still famous with considerable reputation, but Lily is not so eager to read any of these novels mainly because she does not like being scared. In fact, she once tried to read one of Blum’s novels, but even its first few pages turned out to be too much for her.

Unfortunately, it looks like she comes into a place she should have avoided from the beginning. During her first night in the house, a weird incident happens to her, and she is naturally unnerved by that. While she comes to get accustomed to the quiet emptiness inside the house as time goes by, strange things continue to happen, and she cannot help but more agitated as becoming more conscious of what might be inside the house besides her and Blum.

Iamtheprettythingthatlivesinthehouse03

While her senile mind becomes more deteriorated, Blum keeps confusing Lily with someone named Polly, and Lily later comes to learn that Polly is actually the heroine of one of Blum’s novels. Although she is curious about that novel in question, she hesitates to read it as a certain dark possibility comes to dawn upon her; it is possible that Blum’s novel is based on what a ghost living in her house told her, and that ghost may still be inside the house at present.

As our heroine accordingly comes to feel more nervous day by day, the movie slowly doles out several spooky things to us. Besides that rug in the hallway which is often flipped up for no particular reason, there is also a growing spot of mold on a wall, which may be due to some plumbing problem but seems to be suggesting something terrible behind the wall. As Lily manages to read the first few pages of that novel by Blum, Polly (Lucy Boynton) begins to feel more palpable in Lily’s mind, and we get a chilling scene which may be 1) what really happened in the past or 2) what eventually occurs in Blum’s novel or 3) what is actually imagined by Lily.

Director/writer Osgood Perkins, who is the elder son of Anthony Perkins, did a commendable job of establishing the sense of dread throughout his movie. Even during its bright day scenes, the movie is shrouded in moodiness and uneasiness, and we come to follow its slow but steady progress to the inevitable ending which is already announced to us from the start. While there are a few moments designed to jolt us, but they are effectively thrown to us without interrupting the overall narrative flow of the film, and I particularly like one good moment involved with an old TV.

Iamtheprettythingthatlivesinthehouse02

Furthermore, the movie is anchored by a solid performance from its engaging lead performer. Ruth Wilson, who drew my attention for the first time via her villainous supporting turn in TV series “Luther” and then gained more attention thanks to another acclaimed TV series “The Affair”, ably carries the movie with her edgy appearance, and she subtly conveys to us her character’s unstable emotional state even when her character does not say or reveal much to us. While Wilson’s performance is indeed the main show of the movie, Paula Prentiss, Bob Balaban, and Lucy Boynton are also fine in their respective supporting roles, and Balaban is colorful as usual as Blum’s estate manager.

While it clearly evokes other psychological/supernatural horror films such as “The Haunting” (1963) and “Repulsion” (1965), “I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House” is distinctive enough to hold my attention, and it surely delivers a frightening moment as eventually arriving at the finale. What follows after that is less interesting in comparison, but, fortunately, that remains to be a minor flaw compared to what has been maintained well during the rest of the film.

Before “I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House”, Perkins made his directorial debut with “The Blackcoat’s Daughter” (2015), which somehow came to be released in US early in this year after “I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House” was released via Netflix in late 2016. I have not watched “The Blackcoat’s Daughter” yet, but I can tell you that I am impressed enough by “I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House”, and I think Perkins is a talented filmmaker to watch during next several years.

Iamtheprettythingthatlivesinthehouse04

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment