A Jazzman’s Blues (2022) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4): Tyler Perry comes to Netflix

Here is my inconsequential confession: I did not watch any film directed by Tyler Perry during last two decades. Sure, like many of you, I do know that he has made a bunch of notable films since his first commercial hit film “Diary of a Mad Black Woman” (2005), but many of his movies failed to draw my attention more because, as far as I gathered from the reviews on his movies, I am not exactly one of the target audiences of his films and, above all, they do not particularly look like good movies worthwhile to watch.

Anyway, my trivial personal opinion on Perry has been improved a bit since I enjoyed his delightfully no-nonsense supporting role in David Fincher’s “Gone Girl” (2014), and now he becomes more respectable especially after receiving the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award from the Academy Awards. It is undeniable that he is a major Hollywood filmmaker you cannot possibly ignore, and that is why it is not so surprising that he recently made “A Jazzman’s Blues” for Netflix, which was incidentally released in last week.

Because I have no experience with Perry’s films at all, I cannot tell you whether “A Jazzman’s Blues” is better than his previous works, but I can tell you instead that the movie is a fairly competent Netflix product on the whole. Although the screenplay, which Tyler actually wrote more than 25 years ago, is rather uneven due to many reasons including contrived narrative and blatant melodramatic tactics, the movie has some heart on its sleeve at least, and it certainly does not lack mood and spirit as your average Southern racial melodrama.

After the opening part set in a rural town of Georgia in the late 1980s, the movie immediately goes back to around 40 years ago, and we are introduced to a rather problematic African American family. Hattie Mae (Amirah Vann), a strong-willed woman who also has a considerable singing talent, is proud of her younger son Bayou (Joshua Boone) because he happens to be a very good singer just like his mother, but her musician husband usually bullies Bayou without showing any care or affection for a certain reason revealed later in the story. As a matter of fact, her husband has more expectation on their older son Willie Earl (Austin Scott), who has some potential as a trumpet player as shown from the scene where he confidently performs a bit in front of neighbors.

Anyway, Bayou does not care this much even when his father eventually leaves for Chicago along with Willie Earl, because his heart has been occupied with a young pretty girl named by Leanne (Solea Pfeiffer). As they spend more time together, their mutual attraction becomes more evident to each other, and Bayou, who comes to learn how to read and write thanks to her encouragement, begins to consider marrying her someday.

Of course, like many star-crossed lovers, Bayou and Leanne soon find themselves getting separated from each other against their will. During next several years, they try to contact with each other while never ceasing to love each other, but they are blocked by a number of obstacles including Leanne’s self-serving mother, who once left her when Leanne was young but now returns with some plan for her and her daughter’s future.

It is not much of a spoiler to tell you that Bayou and Leanne come across each other at last by coincidence, but I will not go into details on a very tricky racial circumstance surrounding them, though you can quickly guess right from when you notice Leanne’s certain features. Now she should be very careful and discreet, but Leanne still cannot help but drawn to Bayou, and Bayou also cannot resist her either even though he is well aware of the big risks she is taking everyday.

And then the movie takes a left turn when Bayou has no choice but to leave his hometown as quickly as possible via Willie Earl, who happens to return along with his Jewish manager Ira (Ryan Eggold). At first, Bayou is just an accidental companion to Willie Earl and Ira, but Ira already saw considerable potential from Bayou, and, what do you know, Bayou finds himself becoming a big star blues singer not long after arriving in Chicago.

Nevertheless, Bayou still cannot forget Leanne in addition to being more concerned about his mother’s welfare, and that is the point where the story becomes more blatant and predictable than before. What inevitably happens during the expected finale is indeed tragic to say the least, but it does not feel as impactful as intended mainly because many of its main characters remain to be broad stereotypes merely functioning as plot elements. At least, the main cast members including Joshua Boone, Amira Vann, Solea Pfeiffer, Austin Scott, Ryan Eggold, and Milauna Jemai Jackson try their best with materials given to them, and Boone generates enough romantic heat with Pfeiffer in addition to being convincing in his several performance scenes in the film.

In conclusion, “A Jazzman’s Blues” is not a waste of time at all, and I also enjoyed its good several technical aspects including Brett Pawlak’s cinematography and Aaron Zigman’s score (The songs in the film are arranged by Terence Blanchard, by the way), but Perry could polish his story and characters more for some improvement. He is surely sincere about his story and its main subjects, but he still needs to get better, and, considering how competent he is as a filmmaker at present, I am sure that he will get to that higher level soon.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Honest Candidate 2 (2022) ☆☆(2/4): She is back – with less laugh

Surprise is always crucial for comedy, but there is not much surprise for me in South Korean comedy film “Honest Candidate 2”, a sequel to the 2020 South Korean remake of Brazilian comedy film “The Honest Candidate” (2014). I could see how much its good main cast members try to sell their comic materials on the screen, but, alas, they are not helped much by the tediously repetitive screenplay which simply resorts to predictable laughs, and I soon got tired and bored with lots of disappointment while watching the film during this evening.

The story begins at the point not long after what happened at the end of the previous film. After her political career was seriously ruined mainly thanks to her sudden inability to tell lies, Joo Sang-sook (Ra Mi-ran) returned to a seaside town in Gangwon-do where she once lived with her grandmother, and it looks like she will spend the rest of life there as working in a fish market, but then something unbelievable happens on one day. When some local lad is suddenly thrown into a serious danger, she boldly comes to rescue him, and that incident soon puts her back in spotlight as she is showered with lots of public attention.

As a result, Sang-sook swiftly makes a successful comeback as getting elected as the new governor of Gangwong-do, and she is quite determined to be more honest and trustful than before, but, not so surprisingly, her determination does not last that long as she is reminded again of how complicated it is to run the state government. In the end, she decides to step back a little for the benefit of the people of the state, and, not so surprisingly, that leads to more compromise and cynicism she comes to accept without much hesitation.

And then another unexpected thing occurs to Sang-sook. When she is doing her latest public event for making her all the more popular, she comes to experience something mysterious involved with her grandmother, and, what do you know, she subsequently finds herself incapable of lying just like she was in the previous film. To make matters worse, one of several figures closely associated with her also happens to have the same problem for some reason, and that certainly makes the situation more complicated for her and that figure in question.

This may look like a fun variation of the story promise of the previous film, but the movie only goes for easy laughs without fully developing its supposedly funnier comic circumstance. For example, we certainly expect something outrageous to happen when Sang-sook is going to make a speech in the middle of a very important wedding ceremony, and the movie surely attempts to generate some laughs as Sang-sook struggles not to say anything inappropriate, but the delivery of these laughs are so perfunctory and unsurprising that we are just mildly amused by what is supposed to be the punchline of the scene.

In addition, it seems that the movie often does not seem to know how to build up its heroine’s absurd comic situation. When Sang-sook inadvertently causes a diplomatic crisis between South and North Korea at one point, the movie looks like going for edgier laughs, but this subplot eventually gets fizzled, and the movie comes to focus more on how Sang-sook subsequently tries to clean up her public image in addition to fighting against certain greedy figures ready to get rid of her as soon as possible. Again, our heroine comes to have another important awakening on what is really important for her, and it is not much of a spoiler to tell you that she will triumphantly overcome her obstacles as usual.

However, the movie does not provide much fun or excitement even during that part. The main villains of its story are so broad and cartoonish that it is a shame that their eventual comeuppance comes too easily during the finale, and several supporting characters surrounding Sang-sook are also more or less than silly caricatures who do not show much of recognizable human behaviors. As many of you know, recognizable human behaviors are always an excellent source for good comedy, and I think director Chang You-jeong, who also directed the previous film, unfortunately overlooks this important thing here in this film.

Anyway, I still admire the diligent efforts from Ra Mi-ran, who has quickly risen as one of the leading actresses in South Korean cinema thanks to her good comic performance in the previous film. While she is mostly stuck with clumsy gags and trite jokes, Ra goes all the way like a trouper, and she actually makes a few big scenes in the film look a bit funnier than expected. She can surely handle any comic moment with deft timing, and I will not deny that I chuckled a bit when her character tries a rather ingenious way to tell lies in front of a bunch of international reporters.

In case of several other main cast members in the film, they try as much as they can do with their cardboard roles, and they manage to acquit themselves to varying degrees. While Kim Mu-yeol clicks fairly well with Ra during their several big scenes in the movie, Yoon Kyung-ho and Park Jin-joo are sadly demanded to do lots of clownish stuffs throughout the film, and you may find their characters rather annoying instead of endearing.

Overall, “Honest Candidate 2” does not surpass the comic highlights of its predecessor. Yes, I did not like “Honest Candidate” enough for recommendation, but it did make me chuckle more than once during its first half, and I think you will be more entertained if you see “Honest Candidate” again instead of enduring this middling sequel.

Sidenote: After watching “Honest Candidate 2”, I immediately watched “Singin’ in the Rain” (1952), which happens to be re-released in South Korea in this week. Believe me, you will have a lot more laugh and entertainment from this great Hollywood musical comedy film.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Cow (2021) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): The daily life of two cows

Andrea Arnold’s documentary film “Cow” directly looks into an inconvenient fact of dairy business. It is undeniable that our human society has exploited millions of cows to get lots of milk produced from their bodies everyday, and the documentary gives us a series of sobering moments as calmly observing how its two bovine subjects are exploited in one way or another at one rural dairy farm in England.

The film opens with one of its two bovine subjects giving birth to the other one. After its female calf is successfully delivered, the cow is allowed to mother the calf for some time, but then it is eventually separated from the calf, and then we see it being subjected to the following milking process along with many other cows in the farm. As the camera is simply watching it mooing helplessly toward its calf, we cannot help but feel sorry for it, and we are all the more horrified as observing how it and other cows are systemically used for producing tons of milk secreted from their big nipples.

Although the documentary does not provide any comment or narration, we slowly come to gather how these numerous cows in the farm go through one day after another as constantly handled and monitored by those farm employees. At one point, the cow gets its uterus examined for being checked for whether it is well enough for another pregnancy, and this is certainly not a pleasant sight at all. Just imagine how you would possibly feel if you were frequently forced to get pregnant and then milked again and again while being stuck in a stuffy and muddy place along with many other cows.

Meanwhile, the documentary also focuses on how that calf is handled after being separated from its mother. At first, it is taken to a small cage where it can be raised alone for some time, but, once it grows up a bit more during next several weeks, it soon gets thrown into the system along with many other calves. At one point, a farm employee cauterizes two certain spots of its head for preventing the growth of its two horns, and you may wince as observing how this rather cruel job is casually done step by step.

Nevertheless, the documentary keeps holding our attention thanks to its considerable verisimilitude. As the camera constantly stays around its two bovien subjects and many other cows in the farm, the documentary gradually immerses us into their daily life, and we come to pay more attention to some interesting details presented on the screen. I do not know how the cows actually feel about a certain pop song played in the background, but that soft pop song makes an interesting contrast to their drab life condition, and I was also fascinated with one certain brief scene showing how the hooves of one cow are thoroughly cleaned for a hygenical reason.

The mood becomes a bit sunnier than before when the cows and calves are later allowed to be outside their cages. As they freely move around here and there in a field outside the farm, Arnold and her cinematographer Magda Kowalczyk vividly present a series of pastoral moments enhanced further by bright natural light, and we also become a bit more relaxed despite knowing too well that these animals’ free time on the field will be soon over.

What follows next is more or less than the repetition of what we previously observed. Once it is deemed to be ready for impregnation, the cow is soon put in a cage along with a black bull horny enough for their mating, and its pregnancy is confirmed not long after that. Some time later, another calf is born as expected, and the cow goes through another suffering as being subjected to the milking process along with other cows as usual.

And then there comes an inevitable moment as the cow reaches to the point where it cannot possibly be milked anymore. Although we already know what will eventually occur, it is still quite sad and devastating to say the least, and the camera thankfully distances itself from that a bit while never becoming sentimental about that. In the adamantly objective viewpoint of the documentary, the cow is a crucial but ultimately expendable entity to be discarded sooner or later, and the last scene of the documentary is going to unnerve you more as showing a bunch of calves which will surely go through that grim circle of life just like many cows before that.

On the whole, “Cow” is another interesting work from Arnold, who previously impressed me and other audiences a lot with “Fish Tank” (2009) and “American Honey” (2016). I do not know whether this documentary will actually change your viewpoint on dairy business, but I can tell you at least that it is a mesmerizing experience which deserves to be compared with Viktor Kosakovskiy’s “Gunda” (2020), an equally exceptional documentary about the daily life of one certain female pig and several other animals in one farm besides its little piglets. While these two documentaries do not make any direct point on their respective main subjects, many indelible moments of theirs will probably make you reflect more on our relationships with livestock animals we have exploited for many years, and you may come to understand the value of vegetarianism at least. Sure, we will probably continue to use livestock animals as one of our main sources of protein as before, but, considering how much they have been exploited for our life and society, they deserve better care and treatment at least, don’t they?

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Homeless (2020) ☆☆☆(3/4): They need a place to stay…

South Korean film “Homeless” is about a desperate young couple helplessly stuck in their grim economic status. Without getting any financial help or support at all, they come to resort to some desperate measures for not only themselves but also their little baby, and the movie often feels like a thriller as closely and intensely observing their increasingly precarious circumstance.

During its first act, the movie slowly lets us gather how things have been quite hopeless for Han-gyeol (Jeon Bong-seok) and Go-woon (Park Jeong-yeon). This poor young couple has been trying to get any suitable place where they can live along with their infant son, and they have saved a considerable amount of money for that, but, alas, they only end up swindled by some con man. As a result, they and their baby have no choice but to spend another night at a local sauna, and they become all the more frustrated when their baby happens to be seriously injured.

At least, the baby gets some emergency treatment at a local hospital, but now they will have to pay the medical bill for that, and there is no one to help around them. Neither Han-gyeol nor Go-woon has any close family member at all, and Han-gyeol’s current employer, who is running a small delivery service, is not so willing to lend some money to him for understandable reasons.

Remaining homeless as well as broke, Han-gyeol and Go-woon are accordingly driven into more despair and exasperation, and then Han-gyeol comes with a nice temporary solution for them. There is an old lady who has been very friendly to him while he often delivers a box of sushi to her, and this old lady is living alone in a house without any close family member around her. When Han-gyeol later takes Go-woon and their baby to the house, the old lady happens to be absent, and he tells Go-woon that the old lady asked him to take care of the house during her brief absence.

Go-woon is certainly glad to have a place for them and their baby at last, but it does not take much for us to sense that Han-gyeol is hiding something from her. For example, he tells her not to go inside a certain locked room on the second floor, and, though she is not bothered much by this strange instruction, she gradually comes to see that Han-gyeol was not totally honest with her from the very beginning, while more aware of some weird smell coming from somewhere inside the house.

Nevertheless, Go-woon also discerns that there is not any other option for them and their baby, and things look a bit better for them as they get accustomed more to their new staying place. They feel free and safe as comfortably sleeping with their baby at every night, and that inconvenient fact hovering over them can be ignored for a while at least.

However, their harsh reality keep cornering them more and more. After reporting to the police, Go-woon tries to find that con man, but there is really nothing she can do, and her desperate search eventually comes upon a dead end as expected. In the meantime, Han-gyeol continues to search for any cheap place they may move into, but he only gets frustrated again and again, and he becomes all the more desperate when he and Go-woon come to face another big problem later in the story.

What follows next is pretty despairing to say the least, but the screenplay by director Lim Seung-hyeun and his co-writer Kim Seung-hyun continues to hold our attention as steadily building the tension around its two main characters. Although the movie does not tell us that much about their past, it is implied to us that both of them struggled through some hard times even when they were very young, and we gather that is the main reason why they are so concerned about taking care of their little son. Determined to protect their son from their harsh reality as much as possible, both of them are eventually driven to make some bad choices, and we are not so surprised by that.

The movie is supported well by the unadorned acting from its lead performers, who ably embody their characters’ growing despair and weariness along the story. Jeon Bong-seok is harrowing especially when his character has a grueling moment of conflict at one point, and Park Jeong-yeon has her own several moments to shine in addition to complementing her co-star well during several key scenes. Right from their first scene, we can feel the strong emotional bond between their characters, and their characters’ sincere parental devotion feels all the more palpable because of that. In case of several substantial supporting performers in the film, Song Gwang-ja and Jang Joon-hwi are well-cast in their respective parts, and Song brings some warmth to what can be regarded as a few bright moments in the film.

Overall, “Homeless” is not a pleasant experience at all, but it works as a fairly compelling social drama thanks to its good storytelling and solid performances. Lim, who incidentally makes a feature film debut here, demonstrates that he is a good filmmaker who knows how to present story and characters well on the screen, and it will be interesting to see what he will do next after this commendable start. In short, this is one of notable South Korean films of this year, and I recommend you to check it out if you have a chance.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Vestige (2020) ☆☆☆(3/4): Two short films set in Muju

South Korean independent film “Vestige” alternatively intrigued and baffled me for good reasons. While this is actually two different short films packaged together as a feature film, these two short films are connected with each other in more than one aspect besides their common rural background, and I admire both of them in terms of mood and storytelling. To be frank with you, I am still struggling on how to describe what exactly they are about, so I will instead focus more on how they are about, and I hope that will help you decide on whether you will take a chance with it or not.

The first short film begins with the introduction of a middle-aged woman played by Kim Geum-soon. At first, we see her going to somewhere in a rural region called Muju on one cold winter day, and we gradually come to gather that she is returning to a little village where she once lived some time ago. After arriving in that village, she goes to a nearby mountain where she buried some personal stuffs, and, after retrieving these personal stuffs of hers, she goes to a shabby abandoned house where she resided during that time.

It turns out that the woman was a local shaman, and we soon watch her doing some ritualistic invocations inside her former residence. Regardless of whether it is imagined by her or not, we are chilled as some ghostly figure slowly appears, and then we get some glimpse of her past involved with her daughter. It becomes apparent to us that she was not that close to her daughter for understandable reasons, and then the film slowly shifts its focus from her to what is assumed to be her daughter’s ghost. The film never specifies what actually happened to her daughter, but we begin to sense that the woman has grieved a lot about her daughter’s premature death, and everything in the film eventually culminates to the haunting final scene where the woman comes to find some solace and comfort in the end.

In contrast to the cold and elusive qualities of the first short film, the second short film is more straightforward under its vibrant summer atmosphere. Its main center is a young woman named Min-jae (Kang Jin-ah), and we come to learn about her current status of life bit by bit via a series of episodic moments between her and several other characters in the story. Although she left her family in Muju for studying in Seoul several years ago, she eventually came back to her hometown, and she is currently working as a public servant while living with her widow mother in their cozy family house.

Her first scene in the film shows her having a drinking night at a local bar along with an old female friend of hers who comes to Muju for visiting her. The mood between them is casual and pleasant, but things begin to feel rather odd when they later go outside. Min-jae somehow gets separated from her friend, and the mood becomes rather spooky as she is looking for her friend who is gone for no apparent reason.

Without explaining anything about this baffling happening, the film comes to focus more on its heroine’s personal relationships with two other main characters in the story. Although she is quite disappointed that her daughter chose to be back in Muju, Min-jae’s mother respects her daughter’s choice nonetheless, and we sense how much she and Min-jae care about each other even when they happen to bicker a bit with each other at one point. In case of Min-jae’s boyfriend, he is a pleasant lad glad to spend more time with her, and we later see them spending some free time together in a house belonging to his grandmother, who has recently been in a local hospital due to her illness.

When they are sleeping together in that house, Min-jae’s boyfriend tells her about what his grandmother experienced not long before she became ill. According to him, his grandmother came to sense the ghostly presence of her dead husband at one night, and Min-jae cannot help but feel some creepiness as reflecting more on what her boyfriend told her. Not so surprisingly, she also comes to experience something strange later in the story, and that is followed by a somber but undeniably sublime moment you must see for yourself. As the camera quietly pulls back, we come to see more of what is going on the screen, and the resulting final shot will linger on your mind for a while just like the final shot of the first short film.

It goes without saying that both of two short films will demand some patience from you, but they are worthwhile to watch for atmosphere and details to be appreciated, and their respective writers/directors, Jang Kun-jae and Kim Jong-kwan, deserve to be commended for their competent direction. They also draw good actings from their performers, and Kim Geum-soon and Kang Jin-ah are convincing in each own way while supported well by several other performers including Lee Tae-gyoo and Ahn So-hee.

On the whole, “Vestige” is rather challenging as your average arthouse film, and I still do not think I understand everything in its two stories, but I was often impressed by a number of hauntingly poetic moments in the film. Like several other recent South Korean independent films such as “Chorokbam” (2021), this is surely something different from what we usually encounter at movie theaters, and I am already willing to revisit the film for appreciating more of its interesting aspects.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Sisters on the Road (2009) ☆☆☆(3/4): Two different sisters on a journey

South Korean film “Sisters on the Road”, whose remastered version happens to be re-released in South Korean theaters in this week, engaged me more than expected. At first, it begins as a simple but intimate drama revolving around two very different family members, and then it takes a sudden unexpected plot turn during its third act. Although the movie came out in 2009, I did not know anything about it because it somehow eluded me at that time, so I was really caught off guard during my viewing, and I also appreciated how it generates some genuine poignancy among its main characters after that crucial narrative point.

At the beginning, the movie introduces us to its two main characters: Myeong-joo (Gong Hyo-jin) and Myeong-eun (Shin Min-a). As shown from a series of flashback scenes in the film, there was a time when they grew up closely together as half-sisters in their hometown in Jeju Island, but they have been estranged from each other as respectively leading each own life, and the opening scene shows how much they are different from each other in many aspects. While Myeong-joo is a single mother who has raised her little daughter along with her mother and aunt, Myeong-eun has lived in Seoul since leaving their hometown some time ago, and we see how she busily works in some company while her half-sister is diligently working at a local fish market as usual.

Both of these two half-sisters are not particularly willing to contact with each other, but then there comes a sad news. Their dear mother has died, so Myeong-eun has to come back to her hometown, and then she dutifully accompanies Myeong-joo and their aunt. Their aunt is clearly devastated a lot by the death of their mother, but she is still pleased to see Myeong-eun again, and there is a little tender moment as she and her nieces share some old memories while rummaging those old stuffs belonging to their dead mother.

One of those old items is a letter from the biological father of Myeong-eun, who suddenly left Myeong-eun’s mother not long before Myeong-eun’s birth. While still resentful about that, Myeong-eun wants to know where her biological father is, and she asks Myeong-joo to join her search for him mainly because Myeong-joo was quite close to him during that time. Myeong-joo is initially reluctant, but her aunt persuades her to do that, mainly because she thinks her nieces really need to spend some time together for bonding with each other again.

Of course, things do not go well between Myeong-joo and Myeong-eun right from the beginning. Due to Myeong-joo’s acrophobia, Myeong-eun has no choice but to travel back to the mainland by ship instead of airplane, and she also cannot help but annoyed with her half-sister’s rather thoughtless behaviors. While she does feel sad about the loss of her mother, Myeong-joo cannot resist having some fun and drink nonetheless, and that certainly exasperates her half-sister a lot.

Meanwhile, their journey turns out to be more complicated than expected. While there comes a big setback later, Myeong-eun is also pressured a lot by her company manager, who frequently demands that she should come back as soon as possible for some important project. When she and Myeong-joo finally arrive at a city where her biological father supposedly resides (This city is incidentally my hometown, by the way), Myeong-joo wants to spend more time with her half-sister instead of helping her finding him, and Myeong-eun comes to wonder whether Myeong-joo is hiding something important from her.

Of course, a moment of epiphany inevitably comes upon Myeong-eun later, and the mood naturally becomes quite melodramatic as she and her half-sister try to deal with a certain fact in their life, but the screenplay by director/writer/co-producer Boo Ji-young, who would draw more attention from us with her subsequent work “Cart” (2014), does not lose its calm and thoughtful focus on story and characters. For example, a subplot involved with Myeong-joo’s daughter feels rather redundant at first, but it comes to resonate with the main plot more than expected, and there is a little touching moment when Myeong-joo’s daughter comes to spend some quality time with a certain supporting figure in the story thanks her great aunt.

Above all, the movie is held together well by the solid performances from its two wonderful lead actresses, who have steadily advanced for years since the film came out. While Shin Min-a ably holds the ground as the soul of the movie, Gong Hyo-jin brings some humor and spirit to the film as its heart, and they are effortless as their contrasting characters pull and push each other throughout the story. In case of several other main cast members, Chu Kwi-jung, Kim Sang-hyeon, Moon Jae-won, and Bea Eun-jin are well-cast in their respective supporting roles, and Chu Kwi-jung and Kim Sang-hyeon are especially terrific as two different women who raised Myeong-joo and Myeong-eun with sincere care and love.

Although more than 10 years have passed since its original theatrical release, “Sisters on the Road” still feels fresh as a female drama film which handles its relevant main subjects with enough sensitivity and thoughtfulness. It surely reminds me that good movies usually do not get old regardless of how much time passes, and I am glad that this little gem comes to get another chance to approach to audiences out there.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Beast (2022) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4): Idris Elba vs. Lion

Baltasar Kormákur’s new film “Beast” is a simple but fairly competent survival thriller drama. Although I wish it had a bit more fun and excitement besides having more substance in terms of story and character, the movie has some tense moments to be appreciated, and it is also held well together by the strong presence of its charismatic lead actor.

Idris Elba, a British actor who has steadily been reliable and interesting since his breakout turn in HBO TV series in “The Wire”, plays Dr. Nate Samuels, who recently became a widower and has tried to handle his rather estranged relationship with his two young daughters. For getting closer to them again, Samuels brings his daughters to a rural area of South Africa, and they are soon greeted by Samuels’ old friend Martin Battles (Sharlto Copley), who was also close to Samuels’ wife and gladly shows her photographs to Samuel’s daughters.

As Samuel and his daughters spend their first night in Battles’ place, we get to know a bit more about the ongoing estrangement between him and his daughters. Although they love their father, Samuels’ daughters still feel hurt by their mother’s sudden illness and her following death, and, in addition to missing her a lot, Samuels feels quite guilty because he happened to be separated from his wife right before she became ill.

On the next morning, Battles, who is incidentally the manager of a nearby wild animal reserve, takes the Samuels inside the reserve, and the mood becomes more brightened as they enjoy the sights of a number of different wild animals living there. At one point, Battles shows the Samuels a lion pride which has been under his care and protection for years, and we see how much he has been close to those pack of lions.

However, the pleasant mood surrounding them is soon disrupted when they go to a nearby village, where Samuels and Battles discover something quite alarming. As already shown to us from the very first scene, there is a very dangerous rogue lion somewhere in the reserve, and we later come to gather that this lion becomes quite angry and ruthless about human beings for a good reason.

Once they discern how dangerous the situation is, Samuels and Battles quickly leave along with Samuels’ daughters, but, of course, they soon find themselves in a big trouble. With their vehicle unfortunately stuck in a tree, they are virtually trapped on the spot, and they naturally become the latest targets of that murderous lion.

I must point out that the lion in the film does not look that real like those lions in “The Lion King” (2019), but Kormákur and his crew members including Oscar-winning cinematographer Philippe Rousselot try their best for making the urgent circumstance surrounding the main characters of the film look as realistic as possible. The camera fluidly moves even when it is inside the vehicle along with the main characters, and Kormákur and editor Jay Rabinowitz thankfully do not resort to choppy editing during several intense scenes including the one where Samuels must evade the lion while hiding under the vehicle.

As he fights for his and his dear daughters’ survival, Samuels comes to bond more with them, but the screenplay by Ryan Engle, which is based on a story by Jaime Primak Sullivan, does not develop their personal drama enough to engage us. While Samuels is mostly defined by the grief from the loss of his dead wife, his two daughters are more or less than plot elements, and some of their actions along the story feel contrived just for generating more danger and suspense as required.

The last act of the story comes to lose some of what the movie has diligently built up before that point, and that is where our level of our interest is decreased. While it surely gives us what is promised to us via its trailer and promotional poster (You will probably know what I mean), the movie eventually comes to fizzle during its rather convenient finale, and that is one of the main disappointments in the film.

Anyway, Elba dutifully carries the film, and he looks as committed as demanded. Besides ably conveying to us the urgency surrounding his character, he is believable as his plain ordinary character comes to show more courage and strength for saving himself as well as others around him, and I will not be surprised if he subsequently follows the footsteps of Liam Neeson. After all, if he can stand against a big lion, he is surely able to fight against a pack of wolves as Neeson did in “The Grey” (2011), can’t he?

In case of the three main cast members around Elba, they are limited by their thankless roles, but they manage to acquit themselves well. Iyana Halley and Leah Sava Jeffries do a little more than being daughters in danger, and Sharlto Copley also has a few good moments including the one where his character must do something drastic for treating a very serious wound.

Overall, “Beast” does not reach to the level of “The Grey” and other entertaining survival drama thriller flicks, but it is not entirely without thrill and entertainment. I am not satisfied enough because it could go further along with its leading actor who deserves better in my humble opinion, but this is something you can casually watch during your spare time, and I will not stop you from doing that.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Do Revenges (2022) ☆☆☆(3/4): Two Vengeful Girls

Netflix film “Do Revenges”, which was released on last Friday, is a high school comedy film which willingly and proudly follows the footsteps of its seniors. While clearly influenced by a number of notable high school flicks such as “Clueless” (1995), “Cruel Intentions” (1999), and, yes, “Mean Girls” (2004), the movie also distinguishes itself enough in terms of story and characters, and it is surely one of better offerings from Netflix during this year.

At first, the movie tells the story via the viewpoint of Drea (Camila Mendes), a very promising female student of one prestigious high school in Florida. Although she is not that affluent compared to many of her schoolmates, she has steadily established herself as the queen of her school as having herself closely associated with many rich and popular girls in the school, and the movie opens with another event to solidify her prominent status in the school.

However, her carefully established public image is ruined by one unfortunate incident not long after that. When her boyfriend Max (Austin Abrams), who is incidentally the student president of the school, requests a little sex video clip of hers, Drea instantly gives him what he wants without any hesitation, but it turns out to be a big mistake. On the very next day, her sex video clip is spread around many of her schoolmates, and, feeling quite humiliated and exasperated, she comes to make another mistake right in front of her friends and many other schoolmates. As a consequence, she becomes more humiliated and disgraced, and that also subsequently causes a serious trouble in her ambitious plan for her future.

Anyway, Drea tries to endure as much as possible while she and her schoolmates begin their senior year, but there are two things which makes her enraged more than before. After leaving her, Max becomes the boyfriend of one of her ‘best friends’, and he also proudly presents himself as a feminist in front of many others as announcing a new association of his which supposedly promotes and supports feminism. Because she is sure that Max is the one who spread her sex video clip, Drea understandably becomes all the more furious, but she cannot do anything about that because any act of revenge from her may get her expelled from the school.

When she is trying to calm herself down, Drea is approached by a newly transferred female student named Eleanor (Maya Hawke). They actually met each other before the beginning of their senior year, and Eleanor shows some sympathy to Drea because she already knows about what happened to Drea in addition to also having someone who totally ruined her school life. According to her, she once approached to some other girl as feeling attracted to her, but, after coming to learn about Eleanor’s sexual attraction to her, this girl not only exposed and humiliated Eleanor in public, and Eleanor is still seething with anger and resentment behind her seemingly docile façade.

As they come to talk more each other about their respective issues, Drea comes to have one bright idea actually derived from Alfred Hitchcock’s classic film “Strangers on a Train” (1951). While Drea will work on Eleanor’s revenge, Eleanor is going to work on Drea’s revenge in the meantime, and that seems to be a perfect plan for both of them to get away with having what they respectively want right now.

Once Eleanor agrees to work with Drea, the screenplay by director Jennifer Kaytin Robinson and Celeste Ballard cheerfully bounces back and forth between its two heroines as they embark on their respective targets. Because that girl mentioned by Eleanor also happens to be in their school, it is not so difficult for Drea to approach to that girl, and she soon finds out something bad behind that girl. Although she needs extra preparation in advance, it does not take much time for Eleanor to attract the attention of Max and his inner circle members, and Eleanor soon comes upon something dirty behind him.

It is not much of a spoiler to tell you that our two heroines come upon a series of setbacks later in the story, but the movie steadily doles out expected things along with some nice surprises for us. While Drea finds herself attracted to some nice boy who is incidentally a friend of her target, Eleanor cannot help but feel empowered by her dramatically changed status, and then she feels a bit conflicted when she comes to befriend Max’s younger sister, who sincerely wants to get really closer to Eleanor.

Even when the story is heading to its expected finale, the main cast members of the film dutifully hold our attention, and their game efforts on the screen is often delightful to watch. While Camila Mendes holds the ground first, Maya Hawke, who is the daughter of Ethan Hawke and Uma Thurman, is also effective as the other half of the film, and several other performers in the film including Austin Abrams, Rish Shah, Talia Ryder, and Sarah Michelle Gellar, whom you may remember for her deliciously nasty performance in “Cruel Intentions”, are also solid in their respective supporting roles.

On the whole, “Do Revenge”, which is Robison’s second feature film after “Someone Great” (2019) (This film is also available on Netflix, by the way), is an entertaining genre piece packed with enough wit and personality, and I enjoyed the effortless comic chemistry between its two lead actresses. Yes, girls can be pretty mean, and it is sometimes fun to watch how nasty they can be, isn’t it?

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Drifting Home (2022) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4): A drifting apartment building

Japanese animation feature film “Drifting Home”, which was released on Netflix a few days ago, begins with an intriguing story idea to hold your attention for a while, but it only comes to disappoint us due to several flaws in terms of story and characters. While there are a number of wonderful visual moments to savor, the film is often hampered by rote melodrama and flat characterization, and we simply come to observe its drift from the distance without much care.

At first, the story mainly revolves around the strained relationship between two school kids who were once very close to each other. When her parents had a divorce, Natsume (voiced by Asami Seto) was under the care of a benevolent old neighbor for some time, and she and that neighbor’s grandson Kōsuke (voiced by Mutsumi Tamura) become each other’s best friend as spending a lot of time together, though she was eventually taken back to her divorced mother not long after the death of Kōsuke’s grandfather.

While they are still going to the same school in addition to being the members of its soccer club, Kōsuke has been hesitating to get closer to Natsume again, and Natsume also hesitates a lot due to her own personal reason. Besides, there is a popular girl in their school quite interested in getting some attention from Kōsuke, and her presence certainly makes Natsume and Kōsuke more awkward to each other.

Meanwhile, the summer vacation is soon started, and Kōsuke and his two close friends, Taishi (voiced by Yumiko Kobayashi) and Yuzuru (voiced by Daiki Yamashita) sneak into an old apartment complex which was once their neighborhood but is now waiting for demolition and subsequent redevelopment. There has been a rumor about a ghost living in one of the apartment buildings, and they are eager to confirm whether there is actually a ghost living there.

Incidentally, that apartment building in question is the one where Kōsuke’s grandfather resided, and Kōsuke and his friends soon come across Natsume, who turns out to know something about the apartment building. According to her, there is some boy living in the apartment building, but Kōsuke and his friends do not believe her much, and things become more complicated when popular schoolgirl, Reina (voiced by Inori Minase), and her best friend Juri (voiced by Kana Hanazawa) come after noticing Kōsuke and others on the rooftop of the apartment building.

And then something suddenly happens to their befuddlement. Lots of rain is poured onto them and the apartment building, and, what do you know, Kōsuke and other kids are shocked and surprised to find that the apartment building is now drifting alone in the middle of some vast sea for no apparent reason. Furthermore, it turns out that there is indeed a ghost in the apartment, and the ghost, who appears as an older boy called Noppo (voiced by Ayumu Murase), seems to be connected with this inexplicable circumstance surrounding Kōsuke and other kids.

Once they come to realize that they are stuck in the apartment building with no apparent chance for escape, Kōsuke and other kids try to survive day by day as much as they can, and we accordingly get a montage sequence briefly showing how they stick together during next several days. Fortunately, Natsume stored some food and snack in the apartment just in case, and it also turns out later in the story that there are some good opportunities for Kōsuke and other kids to get some extra food for their survival.

Meanwhile, the story by director Hiroyasu Ishida and his co-writers Hayashi Mori and Minaka Sakamoto attempts to go into more details on what is exactly happening around its young main characters, but what follows next is not particularly interesting on the whole. While it becomes clear to us that our young main characters are stuck in some kind of alternative universe, the film often fails to amaze or enchant us as merely drifting from one point to another, and the sudden inclusion of on substantial supporting character during its last act is rather distracting instead of being surprising or inspiring.

Above all, the main characters of the story are not particularly developed well enough to engage us, and most of them remain to be no more than bland plot elements. While the strained relationship between Kōsuke and Natsume is supposed to be the heart and soul of the story, it is not that interesting enough as often stuck in contrived melodramatic moments, and their relationships with Noppo do not have much gravitas as this ghost character often feels non-existent in its airy passive appearance. As a result, we do not care that much about the melodramatic situation among these three main characters during the last act of the film, and that is the main reason why the finale seriously lacks dramatic impact.

In conclusion, “Drifting Home” is dissatisfying for not generating enough wonder and interest from its story and characters. It is not a total waste of time at least due to its competent cell animation style and some good visual moments including the one involved with some other drifting place, but I also must point out that it is still substandard compared to many better Japanese animation films out there such as those sublime works from Studio Ghibli such as “Ponyo” (2008), which incidentally came to my mind for a good reason when I watched “Drifting Home” yesterday. I will let you decide on whether you will watch “Drifting Home”, but I really think you will have a more entertaining time with “Ponyo”.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

A Clockwork Orange (1971) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): It is ticking well to disturb us

Whenever I have to rank the 13 feature films of Stanley Kubrick, “A Clockwork Orange” is always a major headache for me. Along with “Dr. Strangelove” (1964) and “2001: A Space Odyssey” (1968), it shows Kubrick at the peak of his great filmmaker career, but it also remains to be one of the most violent and disturbing movies even at this point, and I usually become conflicted about where I should put it in the list. Yes, it is certainly a very important work from one of the greatest filmmakers in the 20th century, but I also do not think I really like it even while recognizing its undeniably iconic status, which has been steadily solidified along with its lasting notoriety.

Some of you may say that the movie, which is based on the novel of the same name by Anthony Burgess, is worthwhile to watch for its thought-provoking themes and many visually striking moments. I agree to that to some degree, but, seriously, you may think twice before recommending it to others around you. To be frank with you, I still remember well when I showed it to my parents in 2006. My mother was so horrified by what is shown during its first 20 minutes that she eventually walked out, and I came to take a more cautious view on the film as reflecting more on her immediate negative response to it.

Nevertheless, I revisited the movie more than once since that, and I was alternatively impressed and disturbed when I recently watched it again via its new 4K UHD edition. Right from its very first shot, it powerfully challenges you with its young criminal hero’s coldly glaring stare, and then it effectively pulls you into his violent dystopian society during the next two hours. This is not so pleasant to say the least, but our eyes cannot possibly look away as often struck by its gut-wrenching presentation of violence, and that is not so far from what its hero suffers later in the story.

The first act of the film feels like a sort of endurance test for audiences. As its hero, Alex DeLarge (Malcolm McDowell), and his three gang members bounce from one barbaric moment to another, the movie casually wields its vicious mix of black humor and brutal violence across the screen, and that is further accentuated by the terribly brilliant utilization of several classic works of Gioachino Rossini and Ludwig van Beethoven. During the fight scene between Alex’s gangs and a group of some other thugs, the Overture from Rossini’s “The Thieving Magpie” is cheerfully played on the soundtrack, and Kubrick’s precise mix of music and visual makes this scene look like an absurdly violent avant-garde ballet.

And there is that infamous scene where Alex sings the titular song from a certain well-known Hollywood musical movie as he and his gangs savagely attack a middle-aged writer and his wife. Kubrick presents Alex and his gangs’ sheer atrocities with his own cold and detached attitude, and that makes this scene all the more chilling – especially when Alex gleefully stares at the writer (and us) right before raping the writer’s wife. The movie thankfully does not show everything, but the horror of what will soon happen to that poor woman is quite visceral to us, and we come to feel more repulsion than before.

However, as reflected by its first-person narration, the movie also seems to be forcing us into Alex’s sociopathic viewpoint, and that is its another troubling aspect. Usually aligning itself with whatever he heedlessly and sadistically revels in, the movie often finds itself on the verge of embracing his repellent nastiness, and it accordingly feels dangerously exciting at times. After all, violence in films is inherently stimulating in one way or another, and even a cold chamber called Kubrick cannot entirely contain that artistic danger in my humble opinion.

During its middle act, the movie attempts to argue that Alex’s individual violence is nothing compared to the systemic violence of his dystopian society. Not long after he is eventually arrested and then incarcerated, he happens to be selected for an experimental rehabilitation project promoted by the government, and then there comes another iconic moment of the film. Through a very twisted Pavlovian procedure, he is deprived of his free will in exchange of becoming virtually incapable of any kind of violence, and then he finds himself victimized a lot once he is released from the prison.

Are we supposed to be sorry for Alex around that point? What is inflicted onto him is cruel indeed, but we are also reminded of what a horrible criminal he is. When his “cured” status is presented in front of a bunch of important figures, he looks pitiful and helpless on the surface, but he does not deceive us at all. We can clearly sense that his violent nature still exists behind his seemingly passive face despite being artificially repressed for now, and we come to observe his following plight from the distance without much pity or care.

The story feels all the more ideologically muddled when Alex encounters that writer character again during its last act. As a hardcore liberal guy quite critical of the current government, the writer is excited to have Alex at his home, but then he becomes quite vengeful once he comes to realize Alex’s identity. He ultimately ends up being as broad and grotesque as many other supporting characters in the film including a certain prison warden, who is so stiff and petulant that he seems to belong more to a Monty Python sketch.

As the movie has no middle ground between its two extreme kinds of violence, we have no choice but to become stuck more with Alex despite his many loathsome aspects, and we accordingly have to deal with the deeply cynical finale which can be compared to that sublime final moment of “2001: A Space Odyssey”. Instead of that mysterious monolith, we get a couple of big and tall audio speakers in front of Alex’s bed, and the eventual reversion to his old self, which is accompanied with the final minutes of Beethoven’s 9th symphony, certainly makes an ironic contrast to the transcendent emergence of the Star Child at the end of “2001: A Space Odyssey”.

Should we laugh about that? Or should we wince about that? I do not have answers for these and other questions provoked by the movie, but we all can agree that the movie is a distinctive reminder of how many notable films such as “Dirty Harry” (1971) “The French Connection” (1971), “Straw Dogs” (1971), and “The Devils” (1971) were quite willing to push boundaries during that time after “Bonny and Clyde” (1967) came out. They are all violent and controversial in each own daring way, and, just like “A Clockwork Orange”, they will not go away easily once you watch them, regardless of whether you like them or not.

Furthermore, we also have seen how much influential the movie has been during last 51 years. Its uncompromisingly villainous hero, who is injected with lots of life and personality thanks to Malcolm McDowell’s boldly brash performance, has influenced many different juniors ranging from Bart Simpson to Tyler Durden of “Fight Club” (1999). Many key moments of the film have already entered our cultural consciousness, and a recent Gucci campaign, which pays a humorous homage to not only “A Clockwork Orange” but also several other Kubrick films, reminds me again of its considerable timeless qualities.

On the whole, “A Clockwork Orange” is still ticking well enough to disturb us even at present, and I am still trying to sort out my ambivalent feelings and thoughts about it. When I watched it for the first time in late 2000, it was something I had to watch as a young movie fan by any means necessary, and I was glad to watch it at last after hearing so much about it for years. During my recent viewing, I was more alarmed due to acquiring more sensitivity on the depiction of violence on women in movies during last several years, and I became more inclined to put it below several other Kubrick films I personally prefer more. As admiring it from the distance with more caution than before, I am now reminded of what Roger Ebert once said about it in his review on “Butcher Boy” (1998): “Rationalize as I will, revisit the film as I have, I cannot feel the emotional shift that would involve me in the material: It remains for me an exercise, not an experience.”

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments