Bruiser (2022) ☆☆☆(3/4): A young black man between two fathers

“Bruiser”, which is currently available on Disney+ in South Korea, is a familiar but engaging coming-of-age drama to be appreciated for good reasons. Although it stumbles a bit during its last act, the movie still holds our attention thanks to its competent direction and compelling performances, and it works as an interesting character drama about father and son relationship.

Jayln Hall, a young actor who recently made a lasting impression on us via his haunting supporting turn in Chinonye Chukwu’s harrowing drama film “Till” (2022), plays Darius, an African American middle-class teenager who returns to home from some prestigious private school as summer begins. Although he is not particularly excited about spending the summer at his home, Darius is fine to be with his parents Malcolm (Shamier Anderson) and Monica (Shinelle Azoroh), and there is a little warm moment as Monica lets her son have a bit of driving lesson while they are coming back to their home.

In contrast, Malcolm is not exactly warm or considerate to his son, though it is clear that, like Monica, he has done his best for raising their son together for years. He works as a used car salesman, and he is certainly proud of how he has supported his family for himself, though there comes a problem involved with the tuition for his son’s private school. Just because he believes he can take care of this problem alone, he does not tell anything to his son or his wife, and that makes his situation all the more stressful while there is no one to talk with him about that.

Meanwhile, Darius comes to have his own problem. On one day, he goes outside for hanging around with his childhood friends, and then he happens to fight with one of them just for a petty matter. Feeling quite humiliated about being beaten a lot, he eventually goes away, and that is how he comes to meet some guy living on a boat on the nearby river. Although this guy is a total stranger to him, Darius soon finds himself telling a lot about himself to this guy, and he also seems to be interested in befriending Darius.

Not so surprisingly, this guy turns out to be an old friend of Darius’ parents. Many years ago, Porter (Trevante Rhodes) was their best friend, but he left them without saying anything when Darius was born, although he is, yes, Darius’ biological father. After living here and there outside his hometown during next several years, he returned to his hometown at last, and, after meeting Darius, he soon contacts with Malcolm and Monica, who are understandably not so pleased about their old friend’s return.

What follows next is a tense meeting scene between Darius’ parents and their old friend. Porter says he simply wants to get to know his biological son more, so he requests the permission to be officially introduced to Darius, but Malcolm refuses because he is still angry and resentful for some old issues between him and Porter. Even when Monica tries to persuade him later, he is adamant about his position, and that certainly causes a strain on their long relationship.

Anyway, Malcolm and Monica later tell Darius about who Porter is, and Darius becomes more interested in Porter because, well, Porter is much easier for him to hang around with compared to Malcolm as your average carefree drifter. Shortly after clashing with Malcolm at one point, Darius instantly goes to Porter, and Porter is certainly glad to spend more time with his biological son, though their good time at a nearby amusement part does not end well when Darius’ parents finally come to take him back to their home.

This is indeed a typical family conflict we saw from many other similar films before, but the screenplay by director Miles Warren and his co-writer Ben Medina brings considerable depth and sensitivity to its story and characters besides specific details including the race of its main characters. While Darius’s conflict on how to be a man is the main center of the story, the conflict between Malcolm and Porter turns out to be a bit more complex than expected, and Monica provides a little female perspective at the fringe of the story, though she is rather underdeveloped compared to the three other main characters in the film.

Although the film becomes quite contrived during the last act where its main characters are driven further to more conflict, we still care about what is happening among its main characters thanks to the diligent efforts from its main cast members. Hall is believable in his character’s emotional struggle over the story, and that surely confirms his considerable potential and talent to us again. With Hall steadily occupying the middle spot, Shamier Anderson, who recently appeared in “John Wick: Chapter 4” (2022) as one of key supporting characters, and Trevante Rhodes, who also participated in the production of the film, are intense in each own way as their respective characters constantly clash with each other throughout the story, and Shinelle Azoroh brings some life and personality to her rather thankless supporting role.

On the whole, “Bruiser” succeeds as much as intended despite its several weak aspects, and Warren, who previously directed several short films, made a fairly commendable feature film debut here. This is surely a conventional stuff, but it is still interesting to watch for its strong elements including good performances to be savored, and I sincerely recommend you to give it a chance someday.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

A House Made of Splinters (2022) ☆☆☆(3/4): They still have hope, though

Documentary film “A House of Made of Splinters”, which was Oscar-nominated early in this year, simply but closely observes the children and staff members of a special orphanage in Lysychansk of eastern Ukraine. As following how they live day by day, the documentary gives us a number of small but precious personal moments to linger on our mind, and we can only hope that things will get better for these children in the end despite the ongoing war in their country.

The documentary is assembled from what director/writer/cinematographer Simon Lereng Wilmont and his crew members shot at the orphanage during a period of two years. Although the documentary does not give much information on how this orphanage is run and managed by its staff members, we gradually get immersed in its small world nonetheless, and then we get to know a bit about some of the kids temporarily staying there.

As told to us from the beginning, they and many other kids in the orphanage are the children of many poor local families ruined by war, unemployment, and alcoholism. In one of the most poignant moments in the documentary, one little girl comes to befriend some other girl around her age, and you will be touched and saddened as watching one of them casually talking about her first drinking experience under her alcoholic parent.

Before the local court decides whether their parents can still have the rights to live with them, the kids are allowed to stay in the orphanage during next several months, and many of them are certainly not so willing to be with their parents. If their parents lose custody, they will have to wait until someone else comes as a foster parent, and they are going to be sent to some other orphanage if there is not any suitable foster parent even at the end of their staying period at the orphanage.

In case of a little girl named Eva, she is lucky to have someone willing to take care of her instead of her alcoholic mother. When that person eventually comes for her later, she is certainly delighted to say the least, and the staff members of the orphanage are happy to see her departure, though her empty spot will be soon filled by some other girl to come.

In case of a young boy named Kolya, we instantly sense that he is a troublemaker with issues. We see him admonished by one of the staff members for his little misbehavior, and that is just the beginning of his many small and big troubles. He is even caught by the police for running away from the orphanage at one point, but he does not seem to be that repentant about that, as bragging a bit about his little adventure outside the orphanage.

However, the staff members clearly discern that Kolya is as weak and vulnerable as many other kids in the orphanage. It is quite apparent to us that his alcoholic parents are not very good to him, but he still wants to go back to his family home along with his younger sister, and he is certainly glad to see his mother again when she visits the orphanage, though he points out right from the beginning that she still smells of alcohol.

As occasionally looking around the surrounding area of the orphanage, the documentary lets us sense more of how things were desperate for not only the kids and the staff members but the citizens of Lysychansk. Even before Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, eastern Ukraine was ravaged by the conflict between Ukraine and the pro-Russia rebels, and everyone in Lysychansk were constantly aware of the ongoing war because their city was only 20 km (around 12 miles) from the frontline.

In the meantime, the documentary also recognizes some hope and optimism observed from the kids in the orphanage. There is one lively scene where several girls dance together while music is being played in the background, and then we get a little moving moment when Kolya, who becomes adjusted to his new environment a bit more than before, takes care of his younger sister for himself. Still rebellious as usual, he and two older boys smoke together while nobody is watching, and we observe more of their bond and fellowship when they try a bit of tattooing on their arms later.

I wish the documentary showed more of how much the staff members try their best for the kids in the orphanage, but that would probably interfere with its close focus on the kids. Thanks to its intimate approach to them and their daily life in the orphanage, we come to have more empathy and compassion toward not only Eva and Kolya but also many other kids around them, and it is certainly relieving to know that the kids in the orphanage were safely transferred to western Ukraine right after the Russian invasion.

Overall, “A House Made of Splinters” is a modest but solid documentary, and Wilmont, who received the Best Director Award in the World Cinema Documentary section when the documentary had its world premiere at the Sundance Film Festival early in last year, did a splendid job of presenting its unforgettable human subjects with enough care and attention. It may look less impressive than its fellow Oscar nominees such as “Fire of Love” (2022) or “Navalny” (2022), but it is still worthwhile to watch for not only what is about but also how it is about, and you will certainly come to wish the best for these kids in the documentary

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Money Shot: The Pornhub Story (2023) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4): A mild, neutral documentary on Pornhub

Like many of you, I know a bit about Pornhub and several other online service companies associated with pornography. Although I did not use Pornhub much, I must confess that I have often used a certain well-known gay pornography production company as well as OnlyFans for merely exploring my sexual taste, and all I can say is here is that I have been more knowledgeable about what makes me sexually tick than before.

That is why I was quite interested in watching recent Netflix documentary film “Money shot: The Pornhub Story, but this documentary, which was released in last month, feels rather tame and unfocused on the whole. Frequently switching back and forth between two contrasting viewpoints, the documentary attempts to give us a balanced overview of online pornography industry, but I felt more like being jerked in one way or another throughout my viewing, and I wonder whether that was the point from the beginning.

At the beginning, the documentary shows and tells us how the technology advancement of the Internet seemed to promise a brave new world for many pornography industry workers in the early 2010s. Once they get verified on Pornhub or other similar online pornography service companies, they can earn more with more freedom as independent content producers, and several pornography performers interviewed in the documentary are eager to talk about how much they were excited by this new business possibility.

However, of course, as some of you remember, there came a big scandal for Pornhub in 2020. Shortly after an alarming article by New York Times journalist Nicholas Kristof was published, the backlash against Pornhub, which was already set in motion by a bunch of anti-pornography activists including Laila Mickelwait, became fiercer than ever in public. When several big credit card companies refused to provide their service to Pornhub as a consequence, the executives of MindGeek, which is its parent company, eventually decided to be more careful about those adult contents posted on Pornhub.

The documentary frankly recognizes how problematic Pornhub was from the beginning as promising lots of freedom (and pleasure) to its users. While most of those adult contents on Pornhub were consensually shot and then posted, there were also a considerable number of contents which were not so inappropriate in many aspects to say the least. Sure, Pornhub does have hundreds of employees monitoring and moderating the contents to be uploaded day by day, but there is certainly the limit in the ability of these employees. After all, who can possibly not be numbed by watching hundred hours of adult contents everyday?

And that is the main reason why lots of online sex crimes can happen on Pornhub and many other similar websites, and we hear about the certain horrible case of one teenager girl who was quite humiliated when some boy posted a video clip of her naked body on Pornhub. She certainly called Pornhub, but it took several weeks for Pornhub to erase everything associated with her just because it receives lots of cases like hers everyday. To make matters worse, she had to call Pornhub again and again because somebody always posted that video clip here and there.

Several anti-pornography figures interviewed in the documentary make some good points on how online pornography business can be exploitative, but then the documentary lets their opponents making equally persuasive counterarguments. For example, Mickelwait and many other anti-pornography activists have been associated with the conservative religious groups, and it is a shame that the documentary does not delve that much into this rather questionable aspect of these activists.

As far as I can see, the documentary seems to incline a bit toward pro-pornography, and it surely has a number of interesting figures who gladly talk more about how much they are proud of their sex work business – and how they felt hurt by the unfair backlash against them after the Pornhub scandal in 2020. Many of them had to endure a considerable financial setback because of that, and the sympathy of director Suzanne Hillinger is clearly with them as reflected by some intimate moments showing how they work day by day. Once their business option was shut down in Pornhub, many of them moved to OnlyFans, and they had a little sweet victory when OnlyFans later attempted to put more restraint on their adult contents later but then retreated at the last minute.

In conclusion, “Money Shot: The Pornhub Story” could be more focused as making a clearer stance on its main subject, but it will probably provoke lots of thoughts from you regardless of your personal opinion on pornography. In case of me, I cannot possibly make any neutral comment here, but I can tell you instead that I was amused a bit when I searched for more information on Google after watching the documentary. As soon as I typed “pornhub story”, lots of Pornhub contents appeared on the top of my Google search results, and the Wikipedia webpage of the documentary turned out to contain a lot more information compared to many other documentaries out there. That says a lot about how much the documentary has drawn public attention since it came out a month ago, and, despite my 2.5-star rating, maybe you should check it out right now.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Kill Boksoon (2023) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4): It is hard to be both a killer and a mother…

South Korean film “Kill Boksoon”, which was released on Netflix at the end of last month, often seems to be confused about how it is about. While it looks like a violent black comedy about a strong heroine who struggles to balance herself between motherhood and her lethal profession, it also wants to be a grim action noir thriller film full of remorseless killings, and I was rather dissatisfied with its uneven gerne mix even while admiring the game efforts from its cast and crew members.

The story mainly revolves around Gil Bok-soon (Jeon Do-yeon) a female professional killer who has worked under a “company” led by Cha Min-kyu (Sol Kyung-gu). As shown from a flashback scene shown in the middle of the film, they happened to encounter each other when Bok-soon was a teenager, and, thanks to Min-kyu’s guidance and teaching, Bok-soon became the most successful professional killer in his company while Min-kyu made some aggressive expansion in his criminal business along with his sister/right-hand figure Min-hee (Esom).

However, things recently do not go that well in Bok-soon’s private life due to her adolescent daughter Jae-yeong (Kim Si-a), who has no idea on how her mother has earned her living out there. Mainly thanks to her nearly perfect success rate for many years, Bok-soon has been able to provide a very affluent environment for her dear daughter, but there is still some distance between her and her daughter, and she comes to feel more frustrated than before.

The early part of the movie has some fun with how Bok-soon manages to go back and forth between her profession and her private life. When she is with the mothers of her daughters’ schoolmates, she simply listens and agrees with them while not telling much about herself. When she happens to spend some time with her fellow professional killers who cannot help but envy her considerable success, she feels a bit more relaxed than before, and she even has a casual sex with one of them later.

Nevertheless, Bok-soon comes to feel really tired of balancing herself between two different worlds, and now she must make an important decision. Min-kyu wants to renew their contract, but she seriously considers retirement for spending more time with her daughter, and Min-kyu is not so pleased about that. In addition, he has to deal with a certain serious business problem with other companies under his leadership, and losing Bok-soon is the last thing he wants at right now, though his sister, who does not like Bok-soon at all, is glad to get rid of Bok-soon as soon as possible in contrast.

Meanwhile, there comes another job to be done by Bok-soon, but, what do you know, she feels quite conflicted about this job for understandable personal reasons, and that leads to a very complicated situation for both Bok-soon and Min-kyu. For maintaining the order of his criminal world as well as their close relationship, he is ready to do anything, but Bok-soon does not like this at all, and that naturally results in a serious conflict between them.

In addition, Bok-soon also finds herself in more conflict with her daughter, who causes a big trouble at her prestigious private school and will probably be expelled because of that. As Jae-yeong refuses to tell the motive behind her rather violent action at her school, the gap between her and her mother becomes more widened than before, and Bok-soon does not know what to do with this personal issue between her and her daughter, while also trying to survive her growing conflict with Min-kyu.

Now this looks like a solid setup for an engaging hybrid of action, comedy, and thriller, but the screenplay by Byun Sung-hyun, who previously directed “The Merciless” (2017) and “Kingmaker” (2022), does not advance much from that to my disappointment. While it seems to be quite serious in terms of story and characters, the movie still feels like an one-joke comedy stretched a bit too much, and that is not compensated much by a number of stylish moments doled out among the story.

Anyway, the main cast members of the film play straight to their materials for generating some amusement for us. Jeon Do-yeon, who has been mainly known for winning the Best Actress Award at the Cannes Film Festival for “Secret Sunshine” (2007), deftly handles a number of juicy comic moments besides looking credible in several key action scenes, and Sol Kyung-gu, who previously collaborated with Byun in “The Merciless” (2017) and “Kingmaker” (2022), is effective as Jeon’s counterpart as having his own deadpan comic moments. Although they are stuck in thankless supporting roles, Esom, who was unforgettable in “Microhabitat” (2018), Kim Si-a (Remember that little girl in “Miss Baek” (2018)?), and Koo Kyo-hwan manage to leave some impression at least, and I was also amused by the cameo appearance of a certain well-known South Korea actor during the opening scene.

In conclusion, “Kill Boksoon” is not wholly without entertaining elements, but it does not distinguish itself much as trying to imitate the mood and style of other similar films ranging from “Kill Bill: Vol. 1” (2003) and “Kill Bill: Vol.2” (2004) to “John Wick” (2014) and its several sequels. While it is not as sharp as required as a black comedy movie, it also feels curiously dampened as an action noir film, and that made me care less about its story and characters as observing it from the distance. As a genre exercise, it was fun to some degree, but it does not have much style and substance on the whole in my inconsequential opinion, and, folks, that is a big dissatisfaction.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Furies (2022) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4): A violent and lurid prequel

Vietnamese film “Furies”, which was released on Netflix in last month, is a solid but ultimately redundant prequel. As the origin story of the main villain character of “Furie” (2019), the movie shows us how that character was hardened and toughened by her violent criminal life, and it surely gives several competent physical action scenes to enjoy, but it also feels rather superficial as merely being brutal and lurid at times.

The prologue part of the movie shows how an orphan named Bi (Đồng Ánh Quỳnh) came alone to Ho Chi Minh City when she was very young. She lived with her prostitute mother in some rural region, and her mother cared a lot about Bi’s future despite their miserable daily life, but, alas, something quite traumatic happened on one day. Some drunken guy suddenly came into their residence, and this guy raped Bi and then killed Bi’s mother before murdered by Bi.

Bi subsequently ran away to Ho Chi Minh City, and she struggled a lot to survive alone during next several years. When she gets into another trouble during one evening, she is approached by a mysterious woman named Jacqueline (Veronica Ngo), and Bi soon finds herself going through a series of tough physical trainings under Jacqueline’s guidance.

In Jacqueline’s place, there are also two other young women who are not so different from Bi in many aspects. Both Hong (Rima Thanh Vy) and Thanh (Tóc Tiên) had each own painful experience as being on streets as prostitutes, and they instantly discern Bi’s damaged sides, though Bi is rather reluctant to befriend them at first. As these three young ladies live and train together day by day, they come to bond with each other more and more, and they are certainly ready to do anything for their mentor, who has a plan to get rid of a certain group of powerful (and sleazy) criminals in the name of justice.

As these dangerous criminals are introduced one by one, the movie goes all the way for the very lurid aspects of their criminal lifestyle. Besides drug business, they also manage a big prostitution organization, so we accordingly see many unfortunate women physically violated in one way or another. I understand that the main purpose of these unpleasant moments are 1) showing how rotten and evil these criminals really are and 2) making their eventual comeuppance feel inevitable and exciting, but I must point out that these scenes are also quite exploitative to say the least – especially the camera seems to be more interested in the physical details of those numerous victimized women in the film.

Anyway, the movie surely becomes thrilling whenever it is on action mode, and director/co-writer Veronica Ngo, who previously played the lead character of “Furie”, and her crew members surely have lots of fun with giving us one exciting physical action scene after another. Tóc Tiên and her two co-stars are convincing as they fearlessly throw themselves into lots of actions across the screen, and they come to look like a Vietnamese answer to Charlie’s Angels. Although some of the action scenes in the film use too much of low-budget CGIs, you can feel the considerable dedication of the performers in the film at least, and you will come to forgive its technical limits to some degree.

However, the story, written by Ngo and her co-writers Nha Uyen Ly Nguyen and Nguyen Truong, often stumbles in terms of narrative and characterization. Jacqueline is the most developed character in the film, and Ngo demonstrates again her natural screen presence as looking as commanding as required, but her character is mainly defined by the vengeful personal reason behind her plan. In case of Bi and her two colleagues, they are merely and only defined by their respective past traumas, and that is the main reason why their story of female empowerment often feels shallow and contrived.

Above all, the movie pays a bit too much attention to the villain characters of the film, most of whom are just unpleasant in cartoonish ways without looking like the really good antagonists for Bi and her two colleagues. A subplot involved with one of them does not mix that well into the story, and I was not so pleased with how it merely functions a plot device to motivate Bi and several other main characters more later the story.

During the climactic action sequence, the movie certainly pulls all the stops for giving us more of its brutal violence, but we come to observe that from the distance without much care while the movie is often bogged down by its unnecessary melodramatic elements. As a result, we are not so emotionally involved in what is being at stake for Bi and several other main characters and, and that is the main reason why Bi’s eventual transformation into the villain character of “Furie” in the end lacks dramatic impact.

In conclusion, “Furies” is not a bad action film at all, and Ngo shows here that she is a skillful action movie director who knows how to make effective action scenes, but the overall result is still one or two steps below “Furie”. Yes, that film is also pretty conventional to the core, but it is supported well by Ngo’s strong performance while also engaging us in terms of story and characters, and I think you should go back to “Furie” if you are not so satisfied with “Furies” like I was not at last night.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Saloum (2021) ☆☆☆(3/4): An impressive genre film from Senegal

Senegalese film “Saloum”, which belatedly comes to South Korea in this week via a local streaming service, is a little but competent genre film packed with goodies to be savored. Because I did not have much knowledge on what it is about or how it is about before my viewing, the movie surprised me more than once as starting from one genre area and then going into other one, and I came to admire its skillful handling of mood and details as I got engaged in its story and characters much more than expected.

With the opening narration which will resonate more with the story and characters later, the movie introduces us to a trio of mercenaries called Bangui’s Hyenas, and it throws us right into their latest mission in the middle of the 2003 coup d’état in Guinea-Bissau. Their goal is extracting a Mexican drug lord who is in a serious danger now due to his local drug business, and we are served with a striking scene where these three mercenaries swiftly move across an area strewn with numerous dead bodies on the ground before eventually reaching to where that Mexican drug lord is being held.

Once they rescue that Mexican drug lord and get a bunch of gold bricks as promised to them, everything seems to be going pretty well as they fly to Dakar, Senegal by a little airplane, but there comes a little problem. It turns out that there is a fuel leak in their airplane, so they have no choice but to land in a remote area called Saloum. For getting the fuel as well as some resin to seal the leak, they search for any place where they can get help, and, what do you know, they come to stay in a certain nearby place run by a guy named Omar (Bruno Henry), who welcomes them with genial hospitality without asking too much.

It seems that Chaka (Yann Gael) and his two colleagues can be relaxed a bit for a while in this place, but they remain watchful as before due to a couple of setbacks. First, there is a young deaf woman who quickly recognizes them, and then there comes a local police captain, who supposedly visits simply as an old friend of Omar. As the mercenaries and others including Omar gather for a dinner, everything looks and feels fine on the surface, but the mood gradually becomes tense especially when Chaka and that young dead woman have a serious conversation via sign language in front of others.

We get to know a bit more about Omar’s place and its surrounding area as everyone staying in his place are respectively assigned to do some chores outside on the next day. In case of Chaka, he happens to accompany Omar, and they soon go to a nearby fishing village. After they do a bit of shooting, they come to have a little private conversation, and Omar turns out to have some war experience just like Chaka.

It is also revealed later that Chaka has a hidden purpose behind his back. As reflected by his occasional dream scenes, he has been haunted by an old traumatic memory which seems to be associated with his deep fear of water, and now he is planning to confront the evil origin of his personal trauma. I will not go into details on that, but I can tell instead that the movie will catch you off guard when Chaka suddenly reveals something about him at one point to the surprise of everyone else around him.

So far, the movie feels like an African variation of Western genre, but, after that narrative point, it enters a very different genre, and the resulting mix will surely remind you of several works of John Carpenter. Unexpectedly finding themselves menaced by what has been hidden inside Omar’s place for years, Chaka and several others must find a way to get out of the place as soon as possible, and, fortunately, there is some possibility for their escape despite lots of risk in front of them.

I will not tell you anything about their dangerous opponent, but I can tell you that director Jean Luc Herbulot, who wrote the screenplay along with his producer Pamela Diop, and his crew members did a pretty good job of generating a palpable sense of dread along with enough amount of tension and excitement on the screen. The special effects in the film certainly look quite more modest compared to the ones in those Hollywood blockbuster films, but they are utilized effectively on the whole, and cinematographer Gregory Corandi provides a number of splendid visual moments to be appreciated. While we surely get wide and beautiful landscape shots at times, the movie does not disappoint us at all in case of its several action scenes, and the editing by Nicolas Desmaison, Alasdair McCulloch, and Sébastien Prangère is precise and succinct as delivering one dramatic impact after another. In case of the performers in the film, they all look believable in their respective roles, and Yann Gael’s strong lead performance is supported well by several other main cast members including Roger Sallah, Mentor Ba, Evelyne Ily Juhen, and Bruno Henry.

In conclusion, “Saloum” is worthwhile to watch for its deft juxtaposition of two different genres. Although I do not think I understand everything in the film as a foreign viewer, the movie still entertained me enough nonetheless, and I am definitely interested in getting to learn more about its specific background and details. This is just his second feature film after “Dealer” (2014), but Herbulot demonstrates here that he is another talented African filmmaker to watch, and it will be interesting to see what may come next from him.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Tetris (2023) ☆☆☆(3/4): A business competition at the end of the Cold War

“Tetris”, which was released on Apple TV+ at the end of last month, gives us a fun mix of comedy and thriller which is incidentally based on a real-life story about one of the most popular video games in the late 1980s. I have no idea on how close it is actually to that real-life story, but I must admit that I enjoyed it even while clearly recognizing many embellished aspects here and there throughout the story.

The center of the story is Henk Rogers (Taron Egerton), a Dutch game developer of Indonesian/Jewish descent who saw the considerable commercial potential of a seemingly insignificant video game imported from the Soviet Union when he came across it at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas in 1988. That video game was none other than, yes, Tetris, and, as shown in the film, he had to deal with a number of obstacles before succeeding in his ambitious business plan on Tetris.

The early part of the film succinctly establishes a very complicated business situation surrounding Tetris. At first, it seems that all Rogers has to do is getting a bank loan and then acquiring the license for producing and then selling Tetris in Japan via his partnership with Nintendo, but, alas, the circumstance turns out to be quite messy to say the least. Mirrorsoft, a British video game company represented by Kevin Maxwell (Anthony Boyle) and his father Robert (Roger Allam), acquired the right the worldwide licensing rights of Tetris via their associate Robert Stein (Toby Jones), but both Stein and Mirrorsoft made some glaring mistakes in handling this business deal, and this certainly annoys and frustrates Rogers a lot.

Even though you cannot understand everything in the rather confusing buisness situation surrounding Rogers, the screenplay by Noah Pink cheerfully bounces from one point to another with enough humor and wit, and the movie steadily holds our attention via its vibrant period mood and details of the late 1980s. For example, it frequently uses that simple graphic texture of 8-bit video games for bringing more style and excitment to the story in addition to generating some nostalgia for us, and you will certainly smile especially if you spent a lot of time on those 8-bit video games during your childhood years.

I must confess that I preferred books and movies over video games even during my early years, but I did spend some time on Tetris and other video games when I was not reading a book or watching a movie, and the movie certainly reminds me again of how Tetris was so addictive despite its very simple setting. Sure, this is basically a puzzle game on elementary level, but you can easily learn how to play it within a short time, and it surely challenges and then excites you as getting faster and faster with those colored blocks relentlessly falling from the top of the screen.

Just like Tetris itself, the movie becomes more tense and brisker as Rogers comes upon more challenges along his bumpy quest toward obtaining the worldwide licensing rights of Tetris. Despite the considerable risk he will have to face in one way or another, he decides to go to Moscow for persuading a government company to make a deal with him and Nintendo, and he soon comes to realize how risky his situation can really be. As his main opponents, both Mirrorsoft and Stein are ready to get worldwide licensing rights of Tetris by any means necessary, and the situation becomes all the more serious as KGB enters the picture later in the story.

Although we all know how the story will end, the movie ably maintains its narrative momentum even as Rogers and several other main characters busily make one move after another in their business competition. Although the Cold War is nearly being over, Rogers still must be very careful at each step due to the interventions from a certain greedy KGB officer associated with Mirrorsoft, and Alexey Pajitnov (Nikita Efremov), a Russian computer engineer who developed Tetris, and his family go through a very hard time just because he tries to help Rogers a bit.

During its last act, the movie naturally brings more dramatic embellishment into the story, but you will not probably mind that much as getting thrilled and entertained enough thanks to the good efforts from director Jon S. Baird and his crew members including editors Martin Walsh, Colin Goudie, and Ben Mills. We seldom feel lost even while lots of things happen here and there, and we come to pay more attention to what is being at stake for Rogers during the finale which seems to borrow a bit from the similar climax of “Argo” (2012).

In addition, the movie has another good performance from Taron Egerton, who has shown more talent and personality since his breakout turn in “Kingsman: The Secret Service” (2014). Although I must point out that he does not fit that well to his character’s ethnic background from the beginning, Egerton compensates for this flaw to some degrees with his ebullient acting, and he is also supported well by a number of competent performers including Toby Jones, Nikita Efremov, Anthony Boyle, Igor Grabuzov, Ben Miles, and Roger Allam.

On the whole, “Tetris” is an enjoyable product thanks to its competent direction and a number of good performances, and it will surely make a nice double feature show with “Air” (2023), another recent film about a significant real-life business deal in the 1980s. Although it is less impressive than “Air” in several aspects, the movie has its own entertaining qualities nonetheless, and that is enough for recommendation in my inconsequential opinion.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Sharper (2023) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4): Predictable step by step

“Sharper”, which was released on Apple TV+ a few months ago, assumes that its audiences have not seen many thriller flicks, and that is not a very sharp assumption to say the least. If you saw its trailer or its promotional poster, I am sure that you already have a pretty good idea about how it will handle its story and characters, and I can only tell you that it does not have much surprise in that.

Because the movie is driven by a lot of deceptions and manipulations among its several main characters, I may unintentionally reveal some of its sudden plot turns in the following paragraphs of this review, so I strongly advise to you that you should not read further if you are already determined to check out the movie and want to get entertained as much as you can. To be frank with you, when I was watching the film during last evening, my mind kept working on how to write about its story and characters as less as possible, and I must tell you that was more stimulating that the movie itself.

Anyway, let’s start with the seemingly innocuous opening part of the film, which revolves around Tom (Justice Smith), a shy and quiet lad who has worked alone in a little bookstore located somewhere in the middle of New York City. On one day, a pretty young woman named Sandra (Brianna Middleton) enters Tom’s bookstore, and it does not take much time for Tom to be attracted to this young woman as they interact with each other for a while. When he shows a little generosity to her, she shows some appreciation in response later, and they come to spend more time with each other.

Yes, this looks like your average Meet Cute situation, and we are served with some nice romantic moments between Tom and Sandra, but, of course, things soon become very serious. After seeing how much Sandra struggles with a certain big personal problem of hers, Tom is willing to help her just because she really brightens up his melancholic life. After losing his mother some years ago, he has been quite lonely and depressed, and he has not interacted much with his father Richard (John Lithgow), who has been more estranged from his son since he recently married some other woman.

Now, if you are still with me, you may easily guess what will happen next. Yes, Sandra and Tom’s romantic relationship is not accidental at all from the very beginning. Yes, there is an insidious plot against Tom because he happens to be standing on the way for certain criminal figures behind the plot. Yes, these people are certainly quite untrustworthy in one way or another, and we accordingly should keep guessing whatever they are respectively holding behind their backs before the movie arrives at its ending.

We are supposed to have lots of fun and thrill with that, but we can instantly see through the plot mechanism of the screenplay by Brian Gatewood and Alessandro Tanaka because it gives itself away too much in my humble opinion. For instance, it has Julianne Moore at the very center of its promotional poster, so you will promptly discern that her character will be a definite crucial part of the story, even before her character eventually appears in the middle of the movie. I will not go into details on the relationship between her character and another substantial character in the story played by Sebastian Stan, but it will take less than one minute for you to guess who they actually are as well as what they are planning to do.

At least, Moore, who also participated in the production of the film, and Stan are clearly enjoying a number of juicy moments assigned to them. Because their characters often cannot wholly trust each other, there is always considerable tension between them on the screen, and Moore and Stan deftly handle several key scenes where their characters supposedly show more of their feelings to each other in private.

The rest of the main cast members are more or less than mere plot elements, though some of them acquit themselves fairly well on the whole. Briana Middleton, a young promising actress who previously appeared in George Clooney’s “The Tender Bar” (2021), holds her own place well among her more well-known cast members, and she is particularly good when she has to convey to us her character’s conflicted status later in the story. On the opposite, Justice Smith, an equally promising actor who has been steadily advancing since his notable supporting turn in “Jurassic Park: Fallen Kingdom” (2018), clicks well with Middleton during the early part of the film, and he surely has more things to do than compared to John Lithgow, who, to my big disappointment, does not have much to do in contrast while stuck in his thankless supporting role.

Overall, “Sharper”, which is directed by Benjamin Caron (He has been mostly known for directing several acclaimed British TV drama series such as “The Crown”, by the way), is a competent genre product, but it is just mildly entertaining without leaving much impression on me. As a matter of fact, I can name several other similar genre films much more compelling and interesting right now, and I particularly recommend you “House of Games” (1987) and “The Grifters” (1990). Both of these great movies are much, shall we say, shaper in comparison, and, believe me, you will have a more productive time with either of them.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Ghost World (2001) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): A quirky girl and her unexpected friend

I am fascinated with how Terry Zwigoff’s “Ghost World” has grown on me since I watched it for the first time around 15 years ago. At that time, I was a graduate student who was socially awkward but had been mostly happy and content with being surrounded by books and movies instead of people, and I was just mildly amused by its dry sense of offbeat humor as casually observing its lonely adolescent heroine’s angst from safe distance. When I revisited the film in this year, I recently passed 40 while still being alone after several disastrous attempts on serious relationship, and I came to recognize more loneliness from her and her unlikely friend.

For many adolescent kids out there, high school graduation is surely something to celebrate with joy and excitement before moving onto whatever will come next for them, but that is not the case for Enid (Thora Birch) and her best friend Rebecca (Scarlett Johansson). For both of these two teenage girls, their high school graduation is another boring chapter of their mundane suburban life in California, and Enid cannot help but make a barbed comment, when one of their schoolmates who is giving a supposedly inspirational speech in the middle of their graduation ceremony (“I liked her so much better when she was an alcoholic crack addict – She gets in one car wreck and all of a sudden she’s Little Miss Perfect and everyone loves her.”).

Although they have been eager to get out of their high school, Enid and Rebecca actually do not have much plan about the next chapter of their life. Sure, they promised to themselves that they will get a job and then live together after their graduation, but neither of them has never thought beyond that, and they usually occupy themselves with observing their plain and dull surrounding environment with ironic detachment and a bit of naughtiness. One of their usual entertainments comes from a dorky lad named Josh (Brad Renfro), and this poor lad always becomes a schmuck to tease for Enid and Rebecca whenever they come to a local convenient store where he works as a part-time employee.

On one day, there comes another opportunity for naughty fun to Enid and Rebecca when they happen to spot one rather pathetic personal advertisement on a local newspaper. They decide to do a mean prank on the figure behind that personal advertisement, and that is how they come to encounter Seymour (Steve Buscemi). Right from when he enters a local restaurant where they are waiting for his appearance, this guy exudes that unmistakable aura of misery and loneliness, but Enid unexpectedly finds herself becoming quite interested in him in contrast to her best friend, who simply disregards Seymour as another loser to watch from the distance.

We can easily discern why Enid is so fascinated with Seymour. After all, as a girl of specific cultural taste with her own cynical sense of humor, she often feels alienated even when she hangs around with her best friend. In fact, we gradually gather that, despite their long friendship, Rebecca has stuck around Enid as a mere fellow outsider even though they do not share much between them besides their annoyance and frustration with their surrounding environment. Furthermore, Rebecca is actually ready to move forward on her own way, and we naturally come to sense more of the growing gap between her and Enid, who still fails to get stably employed unlike Rebecca.

From Seymour, Enid finds someone who can be a better alternative for friendship because, well, he is much lonelier than she is in many aspects. Whenever he is not working as an assistant manager in some local fast food restaurant chain company, he usually occupies himself with a vast collection of old LP records and some other old stuffs in his residence, and there is an amusing scene where Enid and Rebecca are completely at a loss while attending Seymour’s small private party full of his fellow LP record collectors. Unless you are a serious LP record collector, you will not totally understand what the hell these nerdy folks are talking about (Don’t worry – I don’t either, to be frank with you, though I would love to hear their opinions on how LP records become popular again these days).

Because Seymour has not had much luck or success in case of romantic relationship, Enid impulsively decides to help her new friend a bit. To their little surprise, that leads to a fairly successful dating for Seymour, but then, needless to say, both Enid and Seymour subsequently find themselves in a tricky emotional circumstance later in the story. What eventually occurs between them is not exactly surprising for us, but the movie never lets their complex relationship simply defined by mere mutual sexual attraction, and we come to empathize more with the aching need and confusion inside them.

“Ghost World” was Zwigoff’s first feature film after his two documentary films “Louie Bluie” (1985) and “Crumb” (1994), which is the vivid and fascinating presentation of the life, personality, and career of legendary American cartoonist Robert Crumb. As a filmmaker who did not hesitate to delve into his old friend Crumb’s personal demons while also struggling a lot with his own personal demons (He told Roger Ebert that he was so agonized by his back pain during that time that he actually slept with a gun under his pillow for killing himself at any point if that seemed necessary to him), he was surely the right director for the dark wit and melancholic sensibility of “Ghost World”, and he and his co-writer Daniel Clowes, who made the comic book series of the same name on which the movie is based, provide a number of sharp dialogue scenes which bring more depth and humanity to its main characters. While many of main characters in the film including Enid are not very likable to say the least, their palpable personalities linger on us a lot more than expected as occasionally enlivening their drab and mediocre suburban world, and even Enid’s hopelessly boring father leaves a bit of impression on us despite his sheer suburban banality.

The main performers of the film are pitch-perfect in their respective roles. As the center of the film, Thora Birch effortlessly embodies the angst and loneliness churning behind her character’s defiantly sardonic attitude, and her co-star Scarlett Johansson dutifully stands by Birch although she automatically draws our attention because of her current status as a major Hollywood actress. While late Brad Renfro is solid as a lad a bit too slow for Enid and Rebecca, Illeana Douglas is hilarious as Enid’s summer art class teacher who unwisely puts the freedom of artistic expression above political correctness when Enid presents one of Seymour’s old stuffs which is quite controversial to say the least, Bob Balaban, Teri Garr, Dave Sheridan, Pat Healy, and David Cross are also enjoyable in their small but colorful supporting parts.

The best performance in the film comes from Steve Buscemi, who should have been Oscar-nominated at that time (He received several major critics awards besides a Golden Globe nomination at least). While he can be a smart, ruthless gangster as shown from HBO TV series “Boardwalk Empire”, this ever-dependable character actor is born to play losers and loners because of his natural weary presence, and he is alternatively funny and poignant as fearlessly diving into the deep pathos behind his character’s meek appearance. He and Birth click with each other well with precise low-key comic timing whenever they are on the screen together, and you will not believe that he actually wanted to shed his character as soon as possible whenever the shooting was over.

On the whole, “Ghost World” can be an acquired taste to some of you, but it is still worthwhile to watch for its excellent handling of story, mood, and character. I will not go into details on the finale for not spoiling your little fun at all, but I can tell you instead that I appreciate the sublime poetic quality of a brief but important moment of epiphany for Enid – and how that beautifully leads to the tentative hopefulness of the following epilogue scene. Regardless of how her last shot in the film can be interpreted, you may sense that things might get better for not only her but also Seymour. Sure, they are still not that social or pleasant even in the end, but you will still care about what may be next for their respective lives, and that is surely an achievement.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

On the Sand House (2023) ☆☆☆(3/4): Now she is stuck with her family business…

South Korean independent film “On the Sand House” is a modest but sensitive character drama about one deeply frustrated young woman. It is clear that she has yearned to get out of her world for restarting her life as soon as possible, but, alas, she only finds herself stuck with a messy family situation instead, and the movie gradually conveys to us her deepening exasperation and frustration along the story.

The early part of the movie succinctly establishes the loveless domestic environment surrounding Jin-yeong (Lee Seol). She is currently living with her parents, but there is not much interaction or communication between her and her parents because they are mostly occupied with each own business. While Jin-yeong is mostly devoted to the preparation for getting employed in Canada someday, her father, who has run a factory for many years, does not do anything at his home except eating and watching TV, and her mother is usually busy with handling various business matters involved with the factory instead of her husband.

And then there comes an unexpected incident not long after another domestic quarrel between Jin-yeong’s parents. Becoming more exasperated and frustrated than before, Jin-yeong’s mother decides to go somewhere for getting some peace of mind, and Jin-yeong does not pay much attention to that when her mother is leaving, but she is subsequently notified of her mother’s sudden death (The movie does not specify much on how she died, by the way).

Quite devastated by her mother’s death, Jin-yeong soon comes to face an important issue involved with the family business. Due to her mother’s death, somebody else should fill her mother’s spot, and, mainly because her older sister is busy with taking care of her own family, Jin-yeong has no choice but to fill the spot for a while as a dutiful daughter. Although she does not know that much about how to handle all those suppliers and buyers associated with the factory, she gets some help from her mother’s assistant at least, though the assistant will leave a few weeks later.

Anyway, Jin-yeong manages to handle her tasks fairly well, but it does not take much for her to realize that the factory has not been doing that well in its business for years. In addition, she also comes to see that her father is the main problem of this difficult situation. Without his wife’s sensible management, Jin-yeong’s father often gets himself driven by his greed and stubbornness, and we can see a big trouble coming from the distance when he later attempts some big and ambitious business plan along with a newly hired employee of his.

Because she knows too well that her father will not listen to her opinion or thought at all, Jin-yeong just keeps concentrating on whatever she is expected to do, while also continuing to prepare for her oversea employment plan. For going to Canada several weeks later, she certainly needs some cash for that, but her father is not so willing to help her, and Jin-yeong naturally becomes all the more frustrated as her time for going to Canada is approaching.

What happens later in the story will not surprise you much, but the screenplay by director/writer Kim Hyun-jung keeps us engaged as carefully developing its main characters bit by bit via small details. We come to know more about what makes Jin-yeong’s father tick, and then we also come to learn more about Jin-yeong’s rather estranged relationship with her older sister, who turns out to be more generous and caring than she seemed at first. When they visit their mother’s grave at one point later in the story, Jin-yeong and her older sister become a bit softer to each other, but there remains some distance between them nonetheless – even when Jin-yeong’s sister shows a little sincere concern to Jin-yeong.

As the emotional center of the story, Lee Seol, a promising South Korean actress who previously drew my attention via her substantial supporting performances in “Herstory” (2017) and “My Punch-drunk Boxer” (2018), diligently carries the film to the end while seldom showing off her character’s conflicted emotional state. Thanks to Lee’s solid performance, we are always aware of what has been churning behind Jin-yeong’s detached façade, and that is the main reason why a certain two key scenes in the last act are emotionally effective.

In case of several crucial main cast members in the film, they dutifully fill their respective spots around Lee. As Jin-yeong’s deeply flawed father, Park Ji-il never makes any excuse on his character, but we come to understand his character to some degree while also recognizing how pathetic his character really is. Although she only appears briefly in the early part of the movie, Ahn Min-young leaves some lasting impression as Jin-yeong’s long-suffering mother, and Kang Jin-ah and Lee Han-ju are also well-cast in their substantial supporting roles.

Overall, “On the Sand House” distinguishes itself fairly well thanks to its good storytelling and characterization, and Kim Hyun-jung, who previously made several short films before making a feature film debut here, shows that she is another promising South Korean female filmmaker to watch. Considering how the future of South Korean Cinema has been rather grim and uncertain as it is going down from the historic success of Bong Joon-ho’s “Parasite” (2019), we need to support more new talented female filmmakers like Kim, and I sincerely hope that she will impress us more during next several years.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment