Armand (2024) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4): At her son’s school

“Armand”, which was selected as the Norwegian entry for Best Internation Film Oscar in last year, attempts a sort of high-wire stunt between the chamber drama films of Ingmar Bergman and the psychological thriller movies of Roman Polanski. While I am not so sure about whether it works as well as intended, the movie distinguishes itself to some degree via mood and style, and it is also anchored by several good performances to notice.

The movie opens with a woman hurriedly driving to somewhere. She is a single mother named Elizabeth (Renate Reinsve), and it gradually becomes evident that she is coming to her 6-year-old son Armand’s elementary school because it looks like he caused some serious trouble at the school. Still not knowing that well about her son’s trouble, she soon meets his classroom teacher Sunna (Thea Lambrechts Valuen) shortly after her arrival, but Sunna is reluctant to tell anything to Elizabeth mainly because the parents of the other kid involved with her son’s trouble have not arrived yet.

Once the parents of the other kid, Sarah (Ellen Dorrit Petersen) and Anders (Endre Hellestveit), arrive, we slowly gather some information about why they come to have a meeting with Elizabeth under Sunna’s supervision. A few days ago, Sarah and Anders’ son was found quite disturbed and distraught in a bathroom in the school, and it was suspected that their son was physically violated by Elizabeth’s son in a very atrocious way. Needless to say, Sarah is thrown into shock and disbelief, and she naturally tries to defend her son, while the others in the room often emphasize to her on how serious the situation may be for not only the kids but also themselves.

As the argument between Elizabeth and Sarah is going nowhere, things turn out to be more complicated than it seemed to us at first. Their sons have been pretty close to each other because Sarah is not only Elizabeth’s close neighbor but also her sister-in-law. Elizabeth’s husband, who incidentally died some time ago, and Sarah once attended the same school attended by Sarah and Elizabeth’s kids, and the school principal, who comes into the ongoing argument between Sarah and Elizabeth later in the story, still remembers when Sarah and her dead brother were his students.

While these and a few other main characters including Sunna pull and push each other, the movie steadily builds up tension across the screen with the frequent close-ups during its several key scenes, and then it enters the realm of warped psychodrama after Elizabeth’s defiant facade eventually crumbles with hysterical laughter at one point in the middle of the story. Getting cornered by Sarah and the school principal in one way or another, she keeps getting exasperated and frustrated, and her state of mind becomes more unreliable as she wanders around the empty corridors of the school alone by herself. If the first half of the film is as tense and sobering as those Bergman chamber drama film, the second half of the film is often reminiscent of several notable Polanski films such as “Repulsion” (1965), and we are not so surprised when Elizabeth comes to lose herself more among hallucinatory figures.

However, the screenplay by director/writer Halfdan Ullmann Tøndel, who made a feature film debut here, adamantly sticks to its distant ambiguity without delving more into its rather broad characters. Constantly vague about many things outside the story besides what really happened between those two kids (They are almost never shown in the film, by the way), the movie just coldly observes its main characters’ increasingly isolated struggles from the distance, and it also feels rather contrived when it has to deliver an eventual resolution around the end of the story.

At least, the movie is fairly engaging thanks to the strong raw performance from Renate Reinsve, who has been more notable thanks to her acclaimed performance in Oscar-nominated Norwegian film “The Worst Person in the World” (2021). While we do not to get to know that much about her character, Reinsve fills her character with considerable intensity and personality, and she is particularly effective during that memorably hysterical scene of hers in the film. We are surely baffled and annoyed at first with Elizabeth’s uncontrollable laughter, but we gradually sense more of her anxiety and frustration as she keeps laughing to the embarrassment of others as well as herself.

In case of several cast members surrounding Reinsve, they are also solid in each way. While Thea Lambrechts Vaulen, Øystein Røger, and Vera Veljovic are well-cast as the three different schoolteachers in the story, Ellen Dorrit Petersen and Endre Hellestveit have each own moment along the story, and they have a dim but remarkably intense scene when their characters come to confront a number of issues in private later in the story.

Overall, “Armand”, which was released as “Everything Began from Armand” in South Korean theaters on the first day of this year, is not entirely satisfying, but it has some interesting elements including Reinsve’s commendable efforts. Tøndel, who received the Caméra d’Or at the Cannes Film Festival early in last year, shows some potential here as a promising new filmmaker, and it will be interesting to see whether he will impress us more in the next time.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Apartment (1960) ☆☆☆☆(4/4): A definite comic masterpiece by Billy Wilder

Billy Wilder’s 1960 film “The Apartment” is about two desperate people who come to reflect more on what they really want during one particularly melancholic Christmas season. This is surely a gloomy story in many aspects, but the movie did a masterful job of balancing itself between humor and pathos, and that is why it remains as one of Wilder’s best works.

The hero of the story is C.C. “Bud” Baxter (Jack Lemmon), a young employee of some big insurance company in New York City who found a rather sneaky way of getting more chance for promotion. He lives alone at a small apartment somewhere in Manhattan, and that is how he can provide a private place to several male executives of his company eager to have an extramarital affair behind their back. Needless to say, this sometimes causes a trouble for Baxter in one way or another, and there is a little humorous moment between him and one of his neighbors, who mistakes him for a tireless lover and drinker.

Anyway, Baxter’s longtime efforts on indulging those philandering executives finally lead him to a little private meeting with Jeff D. Sheldrake (Fred MacMurray, who is as slick and smarmy as he was in Wilder’s another classic film “Double Indemnity” (1944)), the director of the personnel department. It does not take much time for Baxter to realize that Sheldrake also wants to use Baxter’s apartment for his own little extramarital affair, and Baxter cannot possibly say no, mainly because Sheldrake is one of the most powerful figures in the company.

Meanwhile, we come to see that there is another thing Baxter wants besides his promotion. He has been smitten with a young female elevator operator named Fran Kubelik (Shirley MacLaine) for a long time, and it seems that Kubelik also likes him, but it later turns out that there is one big problem unknown to him. She actually had an affair with Sheldrake, and now Sheldrake wants to meet her again, while promising her that he will really leave his wife this time.

Like many other comedy films of Wilder, the movie often generates bitter laughs as observing how much people can willingly bend themselves so low for more benefit and happiness. Although Baxter and Kubelik know what an untrustworthy guy Sheldrake really is, both of them choose to lower themselves in exchange for whatever Sheldrake promises them. They do not certainly like that at all, but they are also tempted a lot by the dangling possibility of success or happiness, and that is something we can still identify with, considering how many of us let ourselves manipulated and exploited by our capitalistic system.

The screenplay by Wilder and I.A.L. Diamond, which deservedly won a Best Screenplay Oscar (The movie won five Oscars including Best Director and Best Picture, by the way), is precise and succinct in its execution, while effortlessly rolling its two main characters toward their respective moments of revelation in the middle of a Christmas party held inside the company. While Kubelik happens to learn more about why she should not have trusted Sheldrake at all from the very beginning, Baxter comes to realize that she is the one Sheldrake is having an affair with, and this moment feels all the more heartbreaking as they keep their respective realizations to themselves.

Shot in black and white film, the movie often emphasizes the gloomy situations of Baxter and Kubelik while distancing itself from the usual cheery holiday mood. Early in the film, we see a vast office space where Baxter and numerous employees work day by day, and that reminds us again and again of his meek and lonely existence inside the company. In case of Kubelik, we cannot help but notice how she is often objectified by those despicable executives besides Sheldrake, and you will see how much the movie influences the recent acclaimed TV drama series “Mad Men”, which is also mainly set in a New York City company during the 1960s and often sharply notices the misogynistic aspects of the American business world dominated by white male executives.

The story becomes more serious when Kubelik attempts to commit suicide in Baxter’s apartment not long after Sheldrake leaves. After she is fortunately saved by Baxter and his neighbor who happens to be a doctor, both Kubelik and Baxter come to sense and then face more of their growing mutual feelings. Nevertheless, they still hesitate as recognizing and respecting their respective status, and there is a poignant moment when Kubelik indirectly expresses her emotional attachment to Baxter (“Why can’t I ever fall in love with someone nice like you?”).

The movie was a big turning point for the acting careers of Jack Lemmon and Shirley MacLane. Around that time, Lemmon quickly rose as a comedy actor after winning a Best Supporting Actor Oscar for his hilarious breakthrough turn in “Mister Roberts” (1955), but he began to demonstrate more serious sides of his talent in “The Apartment”, and that eventually led to a number of memorable works ranging from “Days of Wine and Roses” (1962) to “Glengarry Glen Ross” (1992). Just like Lemmon, MacLane was regarded as a new comedy performer to watch in Hollywood during that time, and “The Apartment” certainly boosted her career, which came to have a fair share of other excellent movies such as “Terms of Endearment” (1983).

On the whole, “The Apartment” is one of the highpoints in Wilder’s legendary careers, and it also has one of the best closing lines which deserves to be mentioned along with the last line of Wilder’s another great comedy film “Some Like It Hot” (1959). The finale may feel a bit too sentimental for some of you, but the movie definitely earns that along with its two main characters, and it will surely touch you a lot. After all, folks, isn’t it really nice for us to see ordinary people doing the right thing, considering these despairing days for the humanity during the 21st century?

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

10 movies of 2024 – and more: Part 3

Now here are 11 South Korean films of this year.

Continue reading →
Posted in Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment

10 movies of 2024 – and more: Part 2

And here are the other 5 movies in my list – with other films good enough to be mentioned.

Continue reading →
Posted in Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment

10 movies of 2024 – and more: Part 1

So here are the first five films of my annual list.

Continue reading →
Posted in Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment

10 movies of 2024 – and more: Introduction

Here are we again as expecting the beginning of 2025, but, boy, what a depressing year 2024 has been. While we were all surely hopeful around the beginning of this year, there were actually some good moments of hope and optimism to cherish, but the world seems to keep going down as shown from the dreadful result of the 2024 US Presidential Election. In addition, the South Korean society was shocked and shaken by those vile, mean, and incompetent politicians including the current President of South Korea during this month, and I and many other South Koreans were all the more devastated by a horrible airplane accident which happened yesterday.

While being quite angry, shocked, and depressed during these last several weeks, I kept watching and reviewing movies as usual, probably because that is the only way to soothe and lighten up myself besides reading books. This year, I wrote more than 300 reviews just like I did in last year, and I still believe that I will go to hell for writing so many reviews every year without getting paid at all for this.

Although I must confess that it was rather hard to pick the No.1 movie of this year, I watched a number of really good movies during this year, and I will gladly share my inconsequential annual list with you as before. Maybe cinema is really dying as some people said again and again during last several years, but there are still interesting old and new stuffs out there, and I came to learn more as enjoying both old and new movies at my home and local theaters.

By the way, mainly because I am just an amateur reviewer in South Korea, I could not watch many notable films of this year including “Babygirl”, “Dahomey”, “A Different Man”, “The Brutalist”, “An Complete Unknown”, “No Other Land”, “Queer”, and “A Real Pain” before the end of this year, but I will probably watch and then review them in the next year. Of course, they will be mentioned at the end of the next year if they are as good as many other folks said.

Posted in Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment

Harbin (2024) ☆☆(2/4): A piece of dry and mediocre seriousness

South Korean film “Harbin” is so serious and ponderous that it often forgets engaging or entertaining its audiences. I do understand that it attempts to be a grim and gritty period drama about one famous real-life national hero and his several comrades, but, boy, what a piece of dry and mediocre seriousness it is. To be frank with you, there is not particularly anything to surprise and enlighten me and other South Korean audiences on its serious historical subject, and that is the main reason why I observed this rueful dirge without any care or attention at all.

Because I and many other South Koreans already know well about the real-life incident on which the movie is based, I think it is fair to tell you in advance that what Ahn Jung-geun (1879 ~ 1910) and his several comrades planned at the time was succeeded on October 26th, 1909. Their target was Itō Hirobumi, the Prime Minister of Japan who is probably the most notorious Japanese historical figure in the Korean history except Toyotomi Hideyoshi. This dude was the central figure in the Japanese colonization of Korea during the 1900s, and he came to a Chinese city named Harbin, which incidentally belonged to Russia along with its surrounding area during that time, for a diplomatic meeting with Russian government officials on that fateful day.

The story begins with Ahn, played by Hyun Bin, and a bunch of his comrades gather in Vladivostok, Russia seven days before the day of assassination. As they and many other Korean independence fighters are cornered more and more, they eventually decide to assassinate the Prime Minster of Japan when he arrives in Harbin, and despite being still quite devastated by what recently happened to him and many other comrades, Ahn is very determined to accomplish this risky mission. As a matter of fact, he demonstrates his strong will and determination to others via a rather bloody act of oath at one point early in the film.

Ahn and several other members including Woo Deok-sun (Park Jeong-min) and Kim Sang-hyun (Jo Woo-jin) quickly embark on the preparation for their assassination plan, and this is alternated with the relentless pursuit by Mori Tatsuo (Park Hoon), a cold-blooded Japanese officer who once encountered Ahn on a battlefield. Although Ahn spared the life of Mori and a few other surviving Japanese soldiers at that time, Mori has felt quite humiliated about that, and he is surely ready to catch Ahn by any means necessary after being informed about the assassination plot.

Around the middle of the story, it becomes apparent to Ahn and his few trusted comrades that there is an informer among them, and the mood becomes more tense as they try to find the informer in addition to avoiding Mori and his men. There is a quietly tense sequence where Ahn and his comrades wait for any incriminating moment on a train, and everything eventually culminates to whether Ahn really can confirm the informer as time is running out for him and his comrades.

However, we cannot care that much about what will inevitably happen in the end because the screenplay by director Woo Min-ho, who has been mainly known for “Inside Men” (2015), his co-writer Kim Min-seong, often meanders and stumbles in terms of characterization. Ahn and many other characters in the film frequently talk and talk about their political belief, but their dialogues and speeches mostly feel flat and bland without giving any insight into their personality or humanity, and you may instead come to notice more of how much they smoke as endlessly discussing on their assassination plan inside those shabby and stuffy places where they are hiding from the Japanese Army.

In case of their Japanese opponents in the story, they are also not that interesting either. While Mori merely functions as the main antagonist of the story, the Prime Minister of Japan is depicted as a plain bureaucratic authority simply following the imperialistic interest of his country, and that is sort of refreshing in my humble opinion. Lily Franky, a Japanese actor whom you may remember for his good performances in several works of Hirokazu Kore-eda, is surprisingly believable in his low-key acting, though the movie does not give him many things to do except looking haughty or thoughtful during his brief appearance.

Hyun Bin and several other main cast members in the film try to fill their archetype roles as much they can, but many of them are limited by their flat characters from the very beginning. While Park Hoon is only demanded to look to cold and intense throughout the film, Park Jeong-min and Jo Woo-jin manage to distinguish themselves to some degree, and Jeon Yeo-been is so under-utilized that we cannot help but notice that her role is the only one substantial female character in the story.

In conclusion, “Harbin” does not have enough personality and substance to hold out our attention before eventually arriving in its predetermined finale. At least, it looks slick and competent in technical aspects thanks to the first-rate crew members including cinematographer Hong Kyung-pyo (He previously worked in a number of recent notable South Korean movies including Bong Joon-ho’s Oscar-winning film “Parasite” (2019), by the way), but I was only left with the growing hollow impression on my heart and mind, and I am already quite ready to move onto whatever I can watch during the remaining few days of 2024.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl (2024) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): They’re back!

Animation feature film “Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl”, the latest work from Aardman Animations which will be released on Netflix on next Friday in South Korea, is as funny and delightful as we can possibly expect. Although it may not surpass those inspired moments of the first three Wallace & Gromit films, it shows that Aardman Animations does not lose any of its skills and touches yet, and that is certainly a good news for any fan of Wallace & Gromit films.

The film opens with another usual day a goofy inventor dude named Wallace (voiced by Ben Whitehead) and his loyal dog Gromit, and we accordingly get a witty scene showing how they start their morning while Wallace goes through a rather complex preparation process handled by a series of his invented machines. Because he has spent too much money on his inventions again, Wallace needs some money to take care of this financial problem, and then there comes an unexpected solution. A garden norm robot he invented just for helping Gromit’s garden work, which is called “Norbot” (voiced by Reece Shearsmith), actually turns out to be quite useful and efficient compared to many of Wallace’s inventions, and many people in the neighborhood come to show a lot of interest in Norbot.

Delighted by this opportunity, Wallace embarks on doing some gardening business via Norbot, but, alas, there is one big problem. As already shown from the trailer of the film, Feathers McGraw, a villainous penguin who previously appeared in “The Wrong Trousers” (1993), has been waiting for a moment of revenge in a local zoo where he has been incarcerated since his devious criminal plan was foiled by Wallace and Gromit, and he instantly sees a golden chance when he happens to watch a TV new report on Wallace and his latest invention.

What follows next is another delightful comic moment to cherish. Via his own little creative (and sneaky) scheme, McGraw succeeds in getting online access to Wallace’s personal computer, which happens to be connected with Norbot at that time. He does some hacking on the Artificial intelligence control system of Norbot, and, what do you know, Norbot is re-programmed to be quite evil while being under his control (The film surely does not mince any word on the dark sides of advancing computer technology).

It goes without saying that Gromit soon notices that something fishy is going on with Norbot, especially when Norbot quickly manufactures a bunch of other Norbots supposedly ready to serve under Wallace’s latest business. Not so surprisingly, Wallace remains rather oblivious to the growing possibility of trouble and danger, and this certainly frustrates Gromit more than once.

Meanwhile, the film also pays attention to what is going on at a local police station. While Chief Inspector Albert Mackintosh (voiced by Peter Kay) is mostly occupied with a certain upcoming ceremony which will distinguish the last days of his public service, Constable Mukherjee (voiced by Lauren Patel) comes to discern that something bad is happening around their neighborhood, and her attention is soon drawn to Wallace and his Norbots.

In the end, there comes a moment when McGraw finally reveals his diabolic plan (He even does a bit of homage to a certain infamous James Bond movie villain, by the way), and it is naturally followed by a series of comic action scenes as expected. They may not reach to the sublime comic perfection of the climatic chase scene of “The Wrong Trousers” (If you have not seen yet this very special animation short film which also won an Oscar, please check it out as soon as possible), but directors Nick Park, who won no less than three Oscars thanks to some of his Wallace & Gromit films, Merlin Crossingham and their crew present one hilarious moment after another to the end, and you will certainly cheer when Wallace and Gromit save the day again (Is this a spoiler?)

Above all, the film also depends a lot on its style and personality, and that is one of the main reasons why Aardman Animations has been as distinguished as Pixar Animation Studios or Studio Ghibli. Its stop-motion clay animation may look rather rough and broad at first, but it is constantly filled with numerous loving details to observe and cherish, and we come to admire more of those painstaking efforts put behind and in front of the camera.

Furthermore, just like all of Wallace & Gromit films, the film is supported well by one of the most endearing duos in the history of cinema. While you may want to shake your head due to his frequent obtuseness, Wallace comes to us a likable dude you can gladly tolerate for his good nature and irrepressible enthusiasm toward invention, and Gromit surely earns our esteem as sincerely trying to help and support his master as much as possible – even though he does not speak at all throughout the film just like he and his master’s very dangerous opponent.

In conclusion, “Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl” shows Aardman Animations back in element after being relatively less stellar during last several years as shown from “Chicken Run: Dawn of the Nugget” (2023), which is incidentally also available on Netflix. Although that animation film is fairly enjoyable, it is also rather forgettable compared to the better works of Aardman Animations including, yes, “Chicken Run” (2000), and that is why “Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl” is quite welcoming to say the least. In short, this is one of more enjoyable animation films of 2024, and I assure you that you will not regret at all.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

A Christmas Story (1983) ☆☆☆☆(4/4): Still witty, funny, and sweet

Bob Clark’s 1983 film “A Christmas Story” is quite typical but also very special in many aspects. Yes, this is mainly about one ordinary American kid trying to receive a certain toy for the upcoming Christmas, but the movie somehow hits the right balance between sly wit and nostalgic innocence, and that is the main reason why it has been an enduring classic film for every Christmas season since it came out more than 40 years ago.

The story, which is based on Jean Shepherd’s 1966 book “In God We Trust: All Others Pay Cash” (Shepherd also participated in the adaptation in addition to doing the wryly humorous narration of the film, by the way), is set in one suburban neighborhood located in the northern region of Indiana during the late 1940s. As Christmas is coming, a young boy named Ralphie Parker (Peter Billingsley) has been eagerly hoping for getting a Red Ryder Carbine Action 200-shot Range Model air rifle during the ongoing Christmas season, and we are tickled a lot by how much he tries to persuade his parents, who are respectively played by Darren McGavin and Melinda Dillon.

Alas, all Ralphie comes to hear from his parents is “You’ll shoot your eye out.”, but our little hero is not deterred at all, and what follows next is a series of attempts for attaining his goal. At one point in the middle of the story, he attempts to write a good school essay on his passionate Christmas wish which he hopes will impress not only his schoolteacher but also his parents, but, not so surprisingly, he does not succeed at all to our little amusement. Later in the story, he tries to make a wish to a Santa Clause working in a local department store, but that only leads to one of the most hilarious (and twisted) moments in the film.

Meanwhile, the movie immerses us more into the daily life of Ralphie and many other characters around him as they go through a particularly cold winter, and we accordingly get a number of small but hilarious episodes to remember. Ralphie’s father often struggles to fix the faulty furnace in the basement of their house, and his dynamic stream of slang heard from the basement often reaches to the level of rough poetry. Nevertheless, both he and his wife do not approve much of Ralphie uttering a certain bad word at one point (Hint: It sounds a bit like…. “fudge”), and we accordingly get a couple of very humorous moments when Ralphie gets punished in a certain old-fashioned way some of you might heard about before.

These and many other moments in the film are certainly specific to the core, and I must confess that I sometimes observe them from the distance as a non-American dude who has not been that serious about Christmas. Nevertheless, there are also a lot of universal elements to resonate with anyone’s childhood memories. After all, we all had some funny moments to remember during our childhood period, and you will all empathize with the terror experienced by Ralphie and his friends due to a neighborhood bully – and how Ralphie finally become angry enough to feel that enough is enough. Despite being frequently young and wild during my old childhood years, I actually did not get angry that often as mostly occupied with books and movies, but I could also be infernally wrathful at times (I still can be, so don’t ever f*ck with me, folks), and I saw a lot of myself from Ralphie during that hilariously violent moment.

The movie is not afraid at all of becoming broadly comic as shown from several moments of imagination in Ralphie’s mind, but its story is also grounded in a sweet and gentle sense of humanity, which is amply provided by Ralphie’s loving parents. They sometimes look like a mismatched couple due to their vast personality difference, but it is clear that they really respect and love each other like any other decent couple, and we also cannot help but smile as observing their human flaws which look more endearing as I watch the film again and again. In case of an episode involved with a rather bizarre prize item sent to Ralphie’s father, he cannot possibly be prouder and happier about that, but his wife is understandably horrified – especially he enthusiastically puts that item right in front of the living room window for being seen by every neighbor of theirs to her horror and embarrassment.

One of my personal favorite moments in the film comes from the eventual Christmas gift time for Ralphie and his family. An aunt of his happens to send him a very silly bunny costume to wear, and Ralphie does not like this at all, but his mother insists that he should wear it just for being thankful to his aunt. Whenever I had to wear my old military uniform for my annual reserve army training, I felt as miserable as Ralphie during this uproariously humiliating moment, and I am still glad that I am too old for that sh*t at present.

The movie depends a lot on the engaging performance of its lead actor. Although the movie remains to be the sole highlight in his acting career, Peter Billingsley gives a sublime comic performance to remember, and he is alternatively funny and heartfelt without making any misstep throughout the film. McGavin and Dillon ably support Billingsley while having each own moment to amuse us, and so do several young performers including Ian Petrella, Scott Schwartz, and R. D. Robb, and Zack Ward.

On the whole, “A Christmas Story” is something we can always welcome whenever Christmas is coming, and I am glad to report to you that the movie remains as funny and charming as it was when I watched it for the first time in 2009. Yes, as a guy with some morbid sense of humor, I am mostly drawn to its naughtier sides, but I also feel quite warmed by its intimate human moments, and it is certainly qualified as one of the best Christmas movies out there.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Murder on the Orient Express (1974) ☆☆☆(3/4): An Agatha Christie mystery film with enough charm and craft

Sidney Lumet’s 1974 film “Murder on the Orient Express” is all about style and mood. While this is not exactly one of the best film adaptations of Agatha Christie novels, it still works as an enjoyable genre piece packed with enough class and skill, and, above all, it is also quite fun to watch all of these stellar cast members in the film stuck together within a rather limited background. 

 The story, which is based on one of Christie’s most famous mystery novels, is mainly driven by another seemingly impossible challenge for Christie’s famous Belgian private detective Hercules Poirot (Albert Finney). Not long after he gets on the Orient Express train departing from Turkey, Istanbul, one of the passengers approaches to him because this person in question is quite concerned about his safety right now, but Poirot rejects this person’s request just because he is not particularly interested. What do you know, this person is found murdered in the very next morning, and Poirot agrees to do some investigation as requested by his old Italian friend, one of the passengers who is also incidentally an executive of the train company.

Before the story becomes a bit more serious with this unexpected incident, Lumet and his crew members including cinematographer Geoffrey Unsworth did a masterful job of filling the screen with enough period atmosphere and details to behold. As a result, we find ourselves immersed into its romantically old-fashioned style and mood around the time when every passenger of the Orient Express is on the board, and this impression is further accentuated by the Oscar-nominated score by Richard Rodney Bennett (The film received the total six Oscar nominations at that time, by the way).

While the train itself certainly adds extra nostalgia as it passes through a series of landscapes, it is also filled with a bunch of colorful figures who are played by variously distinguished performers to notice. They are (in alphabetical order) Martin Balsam, Ingrid Bergman, Jacqueline Bisset, Jean-Pierre Cassel, Sean Connery, John Gielgud, Wendy Hiller, Anthony Perkins, Vanessa Redgrave, Rachel Roberts, Richard Widmark, and Michael York, and you will be more impressed to know that many of them already won or previously nominated for Oscar before this film (Ingrid Bergman somehow won a Best Supporting Oscar for this film, though even she thought she did not deserve her third Oscar that much).

Around the narrative point where the train unexpectedly gets snowbound in the middle of the second night of its long journey across the Europe continent, the movie efficiently sets up the stage for the next act. A number of small and big incidents happen here and there on the train while our detective hero is trying to sleep, and Bennett’s score naturally takes an ominous tone around this point.

After the aforementioned passenger is eventually found murdered, the movie accordingly goes through a series of Q&A sessions conducted by Poirot inside the snowbound train, and that is where the movie becomes less interesting than before. Whenever Poirot asks some pointed questions to each of those possible suspects, they all naturally look as suspicious as required with some necessary overacting, and this pattern simply goes on and on until our detective hero finally presents his conclusion in front of everyone on the train.

However, the movie fortunately does not lose its sense of fun and humor at all, even though it turns out later that the murder case in the story is closely associated with a devastatingly tragic case of child kidnapping, which is clearly based on the kidnapping and murder of Charles Lindbergh’s son in 1932. Lumet and legendary editor Anne V. Coates make sure that the story keeps rolling as our detective hero digs up one crucial thing after another along the narrative, and Unsworth’s camera steadily focuses on whatever is being exchanged between Poirot and each of his interrogation targets without making the film feel too static or stuffy within its limited background.

Above all, Lumet allows his performers to bring some extra personality to their broad archetype roles in addition to having each own moment along the story, and their game efforts are firmly anchored by the masterful comic performance by Albert Finney, who got deservedly Oscar-nominated for this film. While quite amusing in many of his deliberately mannered touches to savor, Finney gradually takes the center as the plot thickens as expected, and he eventually dominates over all of his other fellow cast members when his character has to deliver a rather long explanation on what really happened at that time (Critic Roger Ebert wrote in his 1974 review: “…it’s fun of a rather malicious sort watching a dozen high-priced stars keep their mouths shut and just listen while Finney masterfully dominates the scene.”).          

 In conclusion, “Murder on the Orient Express” does not look that fresh after 50 years while looking rather trivial due to being sandwiched right between Lumet’s two greater works “Serpico” (1973) and “Dog Day Afternoon” (1975). Nevertheless, it remains fairly entertaining thanks to Lumet’s competent direction and the good performances from his stellar cast members, and it remains to be two or three steps above that recent movie adaptation directed by Kenneth Branagh, which is not bad but merely passable on the whole. Yes, this is an old-fashioned stuff indeed, and it is equipped with enough charm and craft at least, and you may want to savor it again just because of that.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment