Sasquatch Sunset (2024) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4): One year of a Sasquatch clan

“Sasquatch Sunset” is an oddly interesting film which may frustrate you at times for good reasons. Steadily following one year of a small Sasquatch clan inhabiting somewhere in the wilderness of Northern California, the movie simply observes their behaviors and feelings, and it adamantly pushes its challenging story setting as much as it can, though it eventually stumbles more than once due to its rather thin narrative.

At first, we are introduced to the four members of that Sasquatch clan one by one, and we get some sense of hierarchy from them. The group is mostly dominated by the one who can be regarded as “Alpha Male” (Nathan Zellner, who incidentally co-directed, co-produced, and co-edited along with his brother David Zellner), and we soon see him having sex with the only female member of the clan, while the other two members including her child are watching this from the distance.

After that, we observe how these four Sasquatches go through another day in their forest. They often look for anything to eat, and there is a little amusing moment when the other male adult member of the clan, played by Jesse Eisenberg, has to give up what he just found to Alpha Male before trying to grasp the concept of counting.

Needless to say, there is always the possibility of danger around them in the wilderness as reflected by the occasional shots of various wild animals also inhabiting in the forest. At one point, they discover some plant berries to eat, but then Alpha Male discovers something else which turns out to be quite intoxicating. As a consequence, he ends up showing more of what a lousy leader he is, and this leads to a series of humorous moments including the one involved with a poisonous mushroom.

What eventually occurs after that narrative point makes the film feel a bit more serious than before. I will not go in detail here for not spoiling anything, but I can tell you instead that the Sasquatches come to show genuine emotions and this makes us more curious about what they are actually feeling or thinking. Although they are one or two steps below us in terms of evolution, they seem to be capable of showing some sincere consideration, and we come to observe them with more curiosity as well as more amusement.

As the story rolls along several seasonal changes, we come to sense more of a certain biological change from the female member of the clan, who is played by Riley Keough. She understandably becomes more sensitive about her current condition, and the male members around her including her child respect that to some degree, but the situation becomes quite desperate as winter is coming to the forest later.

Meanwhile, the screenplay by David Zellner has its main characters experience a few accident encounters with the world outside their habitat. At one point in the middle of the story, they happen to come across a paved road leading to somewhere outside the forest, and their surprise and bafflement are accentuated further by the unconventional score by the Octopus Project. In case of one particular scene accompanied with an unexpected musical moment, we become more conscious of the rather inexplicable absence of human beings in the film, and that impression is more emphasized around the end of the story.

As coming to lose some of its narrative momentum during its last act, and the movie seems to be at a loss just like its main characters, but you will admire the considerable efforts put on and behind the screen. The directors and their crew members including cinematographer Michael Gioulakis, who previously worked in “It Follows” (2014) and “Us” (2019), did a commendable job of establishing the vivid outdoor atmosphere on the screen, and the Sasquatches in the film look fairly convincing even though we are sometimes clearly see that they are just the performers wearing the costumes and a lot of makeup.

Nevertheless, the four performers of the film somehow bring enough personality and feeling to their respective roles, though I must confess that it took some time for me to distinguish one from another due to their very, very, very hairy appearance. Keough, who has been one of the most dependable actresses in American independent cinema since “American Honey” (2016), deftly and subtly builds up her character along the story, and her resulting good performance ably carries several key scenes in the movie. On the opposite, Eisenberg, who also participated in the production of the film along with Keough, willingly throws himself into an equally challenging task while not overshadowing his co-star at all, and Nathan Zellner and Christophe Zajac-Denek are also effective in their respective supporting parts.

Overall, “Sasquatch Sunset” is not good enough to compensate for its several weak aspects, but it is not entirely without interest, and I admire not only the efforts of its cast members but also the competent direction of David and Nathan Zellner, who previously worked together on “Kumiko, the Treasure Hunter” (2014) and “Damsel” (2018). The directors are already working on their next film at present, and I sincerely hope that I will be more entertained and satisfied.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Jurassic World Rebirth (2025) ☆☆(2/4): Or regurgitation, shall we say

“Jurassic World Rebirth” should be titled “Jurassic World Regurgitation” instead in my trivial opinion. While it is supposed to try to do some new stuffs, it only serves us the same old kinds of terror and action without bringing anything particularly fresh to its declining franchise, and I only ended up feeling more bored and exhausted when I left the screening room at last night.

At least, the movie indirectly recognizes how much we have been accustomed to watching big CGI dinosaurs on the screen since “Jurassic Park” (1993). After what happened in “Jurassic World Dominion” (2022), those dinosaurs become mundane things for the human civilization, and then, due to several issues including climate and disease, they eventually inhabit the remote tropical areas of the Equator region only.

One of those remote tropical areas is a small island near South American continent, and it turns out that some big pharmaceutical company wants to extract a fresh biological sample from three certain dinosaurs for developing a drug to cure human heart diseases once for all. Zora Bennett (Scarlett Johansson), a covert operation expert, is hired for this highly dangerous mission, and we soon meet several other team members including her old colleague Duncan Kincaid (Mahershala Ali) and Dr. Henry Loomis (Jonathan Bailey), a young paleontologist who will willingly assist and help Bennett and her team.

Of course, things do not go that well for them right from when they arrive at that island in question. The island turns out to be much more dangerous because it actually has an abandoned secret facility involved with developing new kinds of dinosaurs, and there is also a serious matter involved with an American family who happens to be sailing around the island.

Even though their plan is jeopardized to some degree due to rescuing that American family from an imminent danger, Bennett and her team keep trying to get their job done as soon as possible in the island, but the situation keeps becoming more perilous. They get separated from that American family as trying to deal with another dinosaur attack, and that is just the beginning of more troubles to come for them.

As the main characters try to survive their increasingly risky circumstance, the movie naturally throws some dinosaurs into the story as expected, but many of their scenes are less scary or awe-inspiring even compared to the three previous Jurassic World flicks. While there is a lovely moment where we are allowed to appreciate the view of a bunch of gigantic dinosaurs for a while as Alexandre Desplat’s score expectedly quotes the theme from “Jurassic Park” by John Williams, many dinosaur scenes feel utterly plain and mundane while mostly existing for scaring us, and this is particularly evident in case of an action sequence involved with T-Rex.

Above all, the new dinosaurs introduced in the film look merely ugly and hideous. Sure, they are supposed to be the freaks of genetic engineering, but they do not look particularly memorable on the whole. In case of a certain big dinosaur appearing later in the story, it looks so unimaginatively dreadful that you may laugh a bit instead of being amazed or excited at all.

In addition, the screenplay by David Koepp, who wrote the screenplay for “Jurassic Park” and its 1997 sequel, does not provide much human element to engage us. While Bennett and Kincaid have a few private moments to show a bit of their inner life, they remain as thin archetypes just like the other main characters including that American family. The subplot involved with the rather strained relationship between the father of that family and his elder daughter’s goofy boyfriend is quite predictable to say the least, and the same thing can be said about the one involved with a cute little dinosaur, which apparently exists only for merchandising.

The main cast members did try their best with their respective generic roles. Although this is not the first time when she played a covert operation expert (Remember all those Avengers flicks?), Scarlett Johansson dutifully holds the center as required, and Mahershala Ali, who is also too good for the movie just like his co-star, provides a bit of extra gravity to the story as required. In case of several other notable cast members, they do not have much to do from the start, but Rupert Friend is suitably sleezy as an employee of that pharmaceutical company, and Jonathan Bailey, who recently became more notable thanks to his supporting role in “Wicked” (2024) and will soon return in its following sequel in this year, manages to bring some humor and enthusiasm to his nerdy but handsome character (In addition, he also gladly participated in the recording of Desplat’s score as one of the session musicians, by the way).

In conclusion, “Jurassic Park Rebirth” is disappointing in many aspects even though director Gareth Edwards, who surely knows how to present big CGI creatures as shown from “Monsters” (2010) and “Godzilla” (2014), try his best with his crew members including Oscar-nominated cinematographer John Mathieson. If you simply want to see more of the same stuffs, you will be probably more entertained than I was, but, folks, don’t we deserve better than this cynical and pointless commercial product?

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Crash (2004) ☆☆☆(3/4): Crashes among racial stereotypes in LA

I must confess that I had a rather complicated history with Paul Haggis’ 2004 film “Crash”. When it won several Oscars including the one for Best Picture right before getting released in South Korean theaters in early 2006, I was disappointed because I rooted for “Brokeback Mountain” (2005) or “Munich” (2005). When I finally watched the movie a few weeks later, I was quite annoyed with the early part of the film as becoming more convinced that the Academy voters indeed made a wrong choice, but, what do you know, my heart was knocked down more than once by the rest of the film, and I came to have some understanding on why my late mentor/friend Roger Ebert picked it as the best film of 2005.

Even though I still believe that “Brokeback Mountain” or “Munich” should have won the Best Picture Oscar instead, I also think “Crash” is not exactly the worst Best Picture Oscar winners during last 25 years (That dishonor should go to “Green Book” (2018), by the way), but, as revisiting it again at last night, I could not help but reminded of how much I and the world have changed since it came out 20 years ago. There was some hope and optimism with Barack Obama entered the White House a few years later, but then there came that Donald J. Trump, whose sheer cruelty and stupidity have exposed and then fueled the truly ugly sides of American racism. Considering what has happened during last 10 years thank to that bastard and his equally racist cronies, the main message of “Crash”, which is basically “Can we just get along well with each other?”, seems quite naïve to me at times now.

Nonetheless, the movie still works in terms of story and characters. Once it quickly establishes various stereotype characters during its first act, the screenplay written by Haggis and his co-writer Bobby Moresco catches us off guard more than once via unexpected dramatic moments, and we come to regard its many main characters with more complicated feelings. Yes, some of them are quite unpleasant to say the least, and that is one of the main reasons why I became so annoyed during my first viewing, but then I came to have some understanding and empathy on them even though I still did not like them much.

Like “Short Cuts” (1993) and “Magnolia” (1999), the movie draws our interest as juggling a bunch of many different characters who turn out to be connected with each other in one way or another as they are going through another day in LA. After the brief prologue scene involved with two detectives who happened to have a car accident right before arriving at a crime scene, the movie moves onto an unfortunate incident between a couple of young black man and a certain white couple, and then we see how that incident indirectly causes a very disturbing happening between a couple of patrolling cops and one black couple.

These and many other characters in the film frequently show each own racism as clashing a lot with each other during its first act, and I must say that this part still gets on my nerve as before. In my humble opinion, the movie tries a little hard on making the point on how we are often not so free from prejudice and bigotry in each own way, and this makes the film look like a mere educational film for school kids at times.

However, its supposedly broad main characters turn out to be a bit more complex than expected as the movie keeps rolling them along its interconnected narratives. For example, one of those two patrolling cops is apparently your average racist, but then there comes a surprisingly powerful emotional moment as he comes across someone who does not want to see him again at all. In case of the other cop, who is your typical rookie cop, he does not approve much of his partner’s racist behavior, but then there comes a tragic moment of irony later in the film, which always reminds me of what John Huston’s character says in “Chinatown” (1974): “You see, Mr. Gittes, most people never have to face the fact that at the right time and the right place, they’re capable of ANYTHING.”

One of the most poignant moments in the film come from the subplot involved with a Latino locksmith. While he may look like your average Latino thug on the surface, he actually turns out to be a caring family man genuinely concerned about his little daughter’s welfare in their rather tough neighborhood, and their little private conversation scene is all the more touching, considering how it leads to another powerful moment later in the story.

Around the last act, the movie loses some of its narrative momentum, but it is still supported well by its strong ensemble performance from its numerous cast members, which is incidentally the best thing in the film. While Don Cheadle humbly holds the center as a detective who must make some hard choice for his problematic family, Sandra Bullock, Brendan Fraser, Jennifer Esposito, Terrence Howard, William Fichtner, Shaun Toub, Loretta Devine, Michael Peña, Ludacris, Ryan Phillippe, and Larenz Tate have each own moment to shine, and Matt Dillon and Thandiwe Newton are particularly excellent in their respective parts. I still remember when I was quite overwhelmed by the painfully human reaction of Newton’s character to Dillon’s character during that dramatic moment, and this actually sensitized me to a considerable degree as a movie reviewer. Yes, Dillon’s character did the right thing for saving her during that scene, but he does not feel redeemed at all as reflected by a brief moment of his later in the film, and I think he will remember more of her pain and anger.

Overall, “Crash” does not age that well compared to its main Oscar competitor, but I think it is still a good film whose several strong elements compensate enough for a number of weak ones including its rather condescending presentation of its Asian characters. I initially gave it 3.5 stars out of four as a young moviegoer, but now I give it 3 stars as a seasoned one with more experience and knowledge, and I will let you decide your opinion on this rather flawed but engaging movie.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Brokeback Mountain (2005) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): A classic tale of star-crossed romance 

Ang Lee’s 2005 film “Brokeback Mountain” has endured the test of time pretty well during last 20 years to my little surprise. While I regarded it as a major breakthrough in several aspects at that time, I also wondered whether it would get eventually aged as opening the door for its numerous juniors to come, but, what do you know, it still works as a classic tale of star-crossed romance with a lot of sincerity and sensitivity.

The early part of the movie, which is set in a rural area of Wyoming, 1963, begins with the first encounter between two different young men: Ennis Del Mar (Heath Ledger) and Jack Twist (Jake Gyllenhaal). They happen to be hired by some cranky rancher to take care of a big herd of sheep on Brokeback Mountain during next several months alone by themselves, and the movie observes how difficult and demanding their job is as they begin their first days on the mountain.

And we get to know these two lads bit by bit. Ennis is quite taciturn while usually focusing on doing his job day by day, but Jack is relatively more flexible about their work while being often quite open about whatever he feels or thinks right now. As a matter of fact, we gradually sense something being developed between Jack and Ennis, as the camera often lingers a bit more on how Jack looks at Ennis.       

In the end, Ennis comes to open himself a bit more to Jack, because, well, there is no one else to talk with besides his partner right now. Both of them come to see more of how lonely they have been in one way or another, and then there eventually comes a fateful moment when they find themselves quite attracted to each other. As observing how they instantly follow their sexual urge once they feel more of their mutual attraction, I was reminded of how I did not hesitate at all in my first sexual experience with a boy around my age in the middle of one night in early 1997. I certainly felt afraid, but I wanted to do that, and I and he immediately followed our urge without thinking anything else.

We subsequently told ourselves that we were not gays, like Jack and Ennis did after their first sex, but we continued our little secret relationship for a while, and that is why I am always a bit amused as observing how Ennis and Jack become more attracted to each other along the story. They surely want to look away from what they cannot totally understand or accept, but they also cannot help but follow what their hearts want, and the movie handles their clumsy but unadorned romance with tender thoughtfulness.

Some time later, Jack and Ennis come to part ways as their work is eventually over, but they cannot forget each other even after they respectively get married. While Ennis marries his longtime girlfriend Alma (Michelle Williams), Jack marries Lureen (Anne Hathaway), the daughter of some rich businessman in Texas. Both of them try to be happy with their respective married lives, but they only find themselves becoming more distant from their spouses, and Ennis does not hesitate at all when Jack tries to reach him later.

While being always happy to be with Jack during their “fishing trips”, Ennis still hesitates to go further because he is still not so comfortable with his homosexuality as haunted by one traumatic childhood incident involved with a murdered gay man. This tendency of his is continued even after he divorces Alma, and this certainly frustrates Jack, who really wants to have a real honest life with his lover someday.  

The screenplay by Larry McMurtry, who is no stranger to loneliness considering his several acclaimed novels such as “Lonesome Dove” and “The Last Picture Show”, and Diana Osana, which is based on the short story of the same name by Annie Proulx, handles several inherently melodramatic moments during the second half of the movie with considerable empathy and honesty. While we come to know and understand its two heroes more than before, we also come to have some sympathy toward their respective spouses, who have to deal with a fair share of emotional issues due to their increasingly distant husbands. 

Lee’s handling of the story and characters seems quite plain and transparent on the surface, but his deft direction makes us pay more attention to small but crucial emotional moments, and he and his crew members including cinematographer Rodrigo Prieto did a stellar job of filling the screen with an ample amount of mood and details to observe. As Prieto’s camera vividly and crisply captures the remote landscapes surrounding Ennis and Jack, we are more reminded more of how lonely they are – and how desperately they need each other. The sparse score by Gustavo Santaolalla, who won an Oscar for this film (The movie also won Best Director and Best Adapted Screenplay Oscar, by the way), effectively reflects the tentative yearning inside Jack and Ennis, and its best moment comes from when Ennis becomes a bit more honest about his feelings around the end of the story.

The movie was a major breakthrough for its four main cast members. While Heath Ledger, who would give us another memorable performance in “Dark Knight” (2008) right before his unfortunate death, is touching in his subtle embodiment of Ennis’ conflicting emotions, Jake Gyllenhaal ably complements his co-star, and Michelle Williams and Anne Hathaway do more than holding each own place around the story. Williams is particularly good when her character is quite confused and devastated after unexpectedly discovering Ennis’ big secret, and Hathaway has a brief but important moment when her character has a short phone conversation with Ennis later in the story. Randy Quaid, Linda Cardellini, and Anna Farris are also effective in their small supporting roles, and you may be amused by the brief appearances of David Harbour and Kate Mara, both of whom were starting their respective careers at that time.

While it may look a bit tame compared to many subsequent LGBTQ+ films ranging from “Carol” (2015) to “All of Us Strangers” (2023), “Brokeback Mountain” is still a powerful love story both universe and specific, and it also remains one of the best works from Lee, whose filmmaking career is as diverse as that of, say, Sidney Lumet. It does not seem so easy to find any common ground among “Sense and Sensibility” (1995), “Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon” (2000), “Hulk” (2003), “Lust, Caution” (2007), and “Life of Pi” (2012), but it is clear that he is a master filmmaker who always pays attention to story and characters first, and it is a shame that he has been rather quiet since the critical and commercial failure of his last two films “Billy Lynn’s Long Halftime Walk” (2016) and “Gemini Man” (2019). At least, he gave us a number of excellent movies besides “Brokeback Mountain”, and he certainly deserves our admiration as before.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Sally (2025) ☆☆☆(3/4): Her personal sacrifice for being a trailblazer

Documentary film “Sally”, which is currently available on Disney+, presents the complex life story of Sally Ride, who was one of the most famous female trailblazers in US during the 20th century. She really tried hard to become a notable figure in the NASA history, and she did succeed in getting recognized and respected for her significant achievement, but she also had to sacrifice a lot of her personal feelings for understandable reasons.

On the surface, Ride was like an almost perfect model example showing that women can do anything as much as men. Thanks to her progressive parents, she and her younger sister were often encouraged to follow their hopes and dreams as much as they could, and, despite frequently daunted by all the bias and discrimination against girls, young Ride kept going before eventually applying for the NASA astronaut program around the late 1970s.

Fortunately, Ride was at the right time for her big aspiration. As shown in 2018 Netflix documentary film “Mercury 13”, NASA actually considered sending female astronauts to the space in the 1960s, and those female candidates selected at that time turned out to be more qualified than many of male astronauts, but, sadly, their hope and dream were discarded in the end due to a lot of sexism in the male-dominated environment of NASA. As shown in recent documentary film “The Space Race” (2023), which is also available on Disney+, NASA belatedly considered more inclusion for women and minority races in the next decade, and that was how Reid and five other women were eventually allowed to join NASA.

Of course, Ride and her fellow female astronauts were all aware well of how much they had to try and work for making that historical moment for women someday. Besides enduring the frequent sexism from many male astronauts and engineers in NASA, they also had to compete with each other everyday just because NASA allowed only one of them to go to the space, and, as her several surviving colleagues remember, Ride was quite competitive to say the least. Compared to her main competitor Judith Resnik, she was usually more focused without being that social, and that calmly professional attitude of hers eventually helped her earn that coveted opportunity in the end.

Of course, as she frankly admitted later, Reid was quite nervous as preparing for her first time in the space along with several male astronauts during several months of 1983. After all, anything could have gone quite right wrong once the launch of the space shuttle was started, but she stayed cool as demanded by her historical moment to come, and she succeeded in accomplishing her first space mission in the end. 

After returning from the space, Ride quickly became one of the most famous women in the world, and she enjoyed this sudden public fame to some degree, but there was a serious personal matter behind her. Around the time when she entered her adolescent period, she became aware of her homosexuality, and she actually had a girlfriend during her college years before joining NASA, though she did not tell anyone about that homosexual relationship of hers.  

In the middle of her NASA period, Ride married one of her male colleagues, but her ex-husband, who eventually divorced her several years later, frankly reveals that they were pretty much like roommates instead of a real married couple mainly because both of them were frequently busy with their respective jobs. In addition, Ride also found herself getting attracted to Tam O’Shaughnessy, an old friend of hers who had been a lot more honest about being a lesbian than Ride. At first, they frequently hung around with each other as close friends, but then they became franker about their mutual attraction, and that was the beginning of their long partnership, which turned out to be much more enduring than expected.

Nevertheless, Ride kept hiding their relationship from others in public to her partner’s growing frustration. When she subsequently left NASA after getting quite devastated and disillusioned due to a shocking tragic accident in 1986 which killed several NASA astronauts including Resnik, Ride became less burdened about her closeted status than before, but she still hesitated to come out of her closet. This led to a big crisis in her relationship with O’Shaughnessy, but, after a serious personal conversation between them, her partner chose to continue to live with Ride because, well, Ride still could make her laugh as before.

Ride did appreciate her partner’s patient understanding, and her last few years poignantly show that it is never too late as long as you are still alive. Becoming far less afraid of what others think about her around that point, Ride finally decided to do what should have been done for her as well as her dear partner, and O’Shaughnessy stood by her to the end as they showed more love and appreciation to each other. 

Although it could go deeper into its main subject for more insight, “Sally” provides us fairly enough enlightenment on Ride’s life and career at least, and director/co-writer/co-producer Christina Constantini handles her human subject with enough care and respect on the whole. It is often sad to observe how much she hid and sacrificed behind her strong and confident appearance, but Ride did her best for her life and career nonetheless, and that is certainly admirable in my inconsequential opinion.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (1984) ☆☆☆1/2 (3.5/4): Miyazaki’s first big break

Hayao Miyazaki’s 1984 animation feature film “Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind”, which happens to be re-released in South Korean theaters a few days ago, is still a rich and enchanting work of awe, wonder, and interest. Although it was only his second animation feature film, the style, mood, and ideas observed from many of subsequent works from Miyazaki are already evident here this film, and it is all the more amazing to observe how much he has advanced from his first big break during last four decades.

Although the logo of the Studio Ghibli appears at the beginning of the film, “Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind” is actually not the first official Ghibli animation film, though its commercial success contributed a lot to the subsequent foundation of the Studio Ghibli. After the disappointing local box office result of his first animation feature film “The Castle of Cagliostro” (1979), Miyazaki went through a brief period of professional slump, but, thanks to the encouragement from his future Ghibli producer Toshio Suzuki, he began to write a manga series titled, yes, “Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind” in 1981, and the following considerable success of this manga series eventually led to Miyazaki adapting it into an animation feature film. 

As revisiting the film at a local theater with a friend of mine yesterday, I was impressed a lot again by its bountiful imagination and ideas. While it looks like your average post-apocalyptic tale at first, its backgrounds and characters are presented with an ample amount of style and personality to observe, and even the sights of those vast and bleak landscapes in the film often shine with mood and details to notice. Furthermore, the film wisely takes its time for establishing not only the story and characters but also its alien but interesting post-apocalyptic background more, and we find ourselves already quite immersed in this strange but compelling world when it goes for more action later in the story.

The heroine of the story is Nausicaä (voiced by Sumi Shimamoto), the strong-willed princess of a little kingdom located in the Valley of the Wind. Around 1,000 years ago, the human civilization and the Earth were destroyed a lot by not only some big war but also environmental pollution, and the remaining humans have struggled a lot for their survival under a very harsh condition. The main obstacle for their survival is those big and wide fungi forests called the “sea of decay”, and the Valley of the Wind is one of a few places safe from the toxic gas and dangerous spores from the sea of decay, mainly thanks to the constant presence of wind.

While many others in her kingdom try to stay away from the sea of decay as much as possible, Nausicaä has been quite curious about whatever is living inside the sea of decay besides those gigantic mutant bugs which sometimes threaten the remaining human survivors. As a matter of fact, it subsequently turns out that she has steadily studied the ecology of the sea of decay, and we come to learn later that she actually discovered something important about this supposedly dangerous place.

Meanwhile, the situation becomes quite troublesome for Nausicaä and her little kingdom. Not long after a big aircraft crashes into the Valley of the Wind, she and many others in the kingdom are threatened by those fungi spores which came along with that crashed aircraft, and they also find themselves stuck in a very tricky position in the middle of the ongoing battle between two other kingdoms out there.

These two battling kingdoms are mainly represented by Asbel (voiced by Yōji Matsuda) and Kushana (voiced by Yoshiko Sakakibara), respectively. While both of them are fairly reasonable persons capable of following their better sides, they are also quite willing to stop each other by any means necessary, and the film does not hesitate to show or imply the devastating consequences of their violent actions committed along the story.

Eventually placed among these two conflicting groups and the giant mutant bugs also willing to do anything for protecting the sea of decay as well as themselves, Nausicaä, who is incidentally a strong female character which will make many Disney Princess characters look quite docile and passive to say the least, tries her best even though all seems lost for her and her people, and she adamantly follows her pacific belief as before. Her following actions of goodwill and courage are depicted with earnest poignancy to touch us, and you may also be reminded of why we should not stop caring at any chance even though things have become a lot grimmer and more pessimistic these days.

Although I place it one or two steps below the greatness of “My Neighbor Totoro” (1988) and “Spirited Away” (2001), “Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind” is still one of the better Ghibli animation films, and I was often entertained as noticing more of how much it has subsequently influenced not only Miyazaki himself but also many other filmmakers out there. Many of its elements eventually became the recurring ideas and themes of his later works such as “Princess Mononoke” (1997), and those big alien creatures in Bong Joon-ho’s recent movie “Mickey 17” (2025) are clearly inspired by the huge mutant bugs in the film. In short, this is a lot more than a mere milestone in Miyazaki’s career, and I assure you that you will soon embrace its awe and wonder.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

F1 (2025) ☆☆☆(3/4): Driving fairly well along a familiar course 

“F1” drives fairly well along a familiar course, and I enjoyed that to some degree. Although predictably following numerous genre conventions and clichés, the movie gives us a series of top-notch car racing sequences definitely worthwhile to watch on big screen, and they will probably make you overlook its generic story and characters at least for a while

The hero of the movie is Sonny Hayes (Brad Pitt), a middle-aged racer who was once a promising Formula One (F1) driver many years ago before his professional career was struck by one devastating accident. The opening scene shows him working as a freelance racer in a 24-hour racing competition in Daytona Beach, Florida, and we see how deftly he accomplishes an important task for his current team.   

When he is ready to leave and then look for another team to hire him, Hayes is approached by his old colleague Ruben Cervantes (Javier Bardem). Cervantes is currently owning and running his own F1 team, and he needs some help from Hayes right now because his F1 team has been rather underachieving to say the least despite its rookie star racer Joshua Pearce (Damson Idris). Cervantes believes that Hayes can help the team as a more experienced racer to complement Pearce, and Hayes eventually agrees to accept his old friend’s request because he comes to realize that he is still hoping for being back in F1 someday despite getting older day by day.

Needless to say, Hayes and Pearce do not get along that well with each other right from the beginning due to many differences between them. However, we all know in advance that 1) Hayes will come to recognize Pearce’s aspiration and commitment as seeing a lot of himself from Pearce, 2) Pearce will also come to listen and learn from Hayes after clashing with him more than once along the story, and 3) they will come to work together more harmoniously for their common goal around the end of the story despite several setbacks for them their team.

Another predictable aspect of the story is involved with Kate McKenna (Kerry Condon), who is the technical director of Cervantes’ F1 team. Yes, besides trying to find a way to improve those racing cars for Hayes and Pearce, she surely must do some extra work for preventing any more conflict between these two willful boys who need to step back a bit for their team work, and Hayes naturally comes to admire her more than before. Yes, McKenna flatly emphasizes to Hayes that she does not want to get involved with him in more than one way, but, what do you know, she and Hayes only find themselves quite ready to cross the line between them later in the story.

Despite all these and other clichés on its back, the movie drives fast and furiously whenever it is on a race track along with its main characters, and director/co-producer Joseph Kosinski, who also wrote the story with screenplay writer Ehren Kruger, and his crew members including cinematographer Claudio Miranda and editor Stephen Mirrione did a terrific job of placing us right in the middle of several car racing sequences in the film. These sequences are constantly packed with considerable realism and verisimilitude besides expectedly providing us a lot of rapid thrill and excitement, and Kosinski, who previously impressed us a lot with “Top Gun: Maverick” (2022), demonstrates here again that he is a competent movie director who really knows how to engage and then electrify us via well-made moments of speed and action.     

The story itself is still less engaging in comparison, but that is compensated by the enduring star quality of Brad Pitt, who seems to be in the need of reminding us that he has not lost any of his vigor and charisma yet just like Tom Cruise has done again and again in “Top Gun: Maverick” and several recent Mission: Impossible flicks. Although the movie does not delve that much into Hayes’ supposedly troubled past, this sometimes resonates with Pitt’s problematic personal life during recent several years, and he ably generates enough gravitas to support his role while occasionally exuding his natural charm and charisma.

It is a bit disappointing that several other notable cast members do not have much to do around Pitt. Damson Iris complements his co-star well with his youthful confidence, but his character remains a generic archetype even though the story tries to bring more inner life to his role. While Javier Bardem, another star actor in the film who can be charismatic as Pitt, is mostly stuck in his thankless part, Tobias Menzies is suitably sleezy and sneaky as a rich businessman associated with Cervantes, and Kerry Condon, who has been more notable thanks to her recent Oscar-nominated supporting turn in “The Banshees of Inisherin” (2022), manages to overcome her clichéd character, though you may often notice a considerable age gap between her and Pitt (She is currently 42 while he is 61 at present, by the way).

On the whole, “F1” works quite well in technical aspects, and I was not that bored during its rather long running time (156 minutes) despite frequently recognizing many of its shortcomings including its predictable narrative course and superficial characterization. Although it is not better than “Top Gun: Maverick” or another recent car racing film “Ford v Ferrari” (2019), it is certainly two or three levels up from the recent Fast & Furious flicks at least, so I will not grumble for now.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Kneecap (2024) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4): Meet Irish rappers

“Kneecap”, which was selected as the Irish entry to Best International Film Oscar in last year, is a typical rapper movie with some local flavor. While it has a substantial amount of irreverent wit and bouncy energy to hold our attention, the movie feels rather flawed at times due to some plot contrivance and thin characterization, and that is rather disappointing considering its interesting main subject.

The movie is a fictional story loosely based on Kneecap, a real-life Irish hip-hop trio from Belfast, Northern Ireland. I have no idea on how much the movie is actually based on their real-life story, but the members of Kneecap, Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, Naoise Ó Cairealláin, and JJ Ó Dochartaigh, play themselves in the film besides writing the story with director/screenplay writer Rich Peppiatt, and I guess they bring a lot of themselves to the film in more than one way.

At the beginning, the story, which is set in Belfast around the 2010s, depicts how things are not so good for Liam and Naoise. two wild local lads who have not thought much about their future as throwing themselves into a lot of fun and drug. When they were little boys, Naoise’s father, played by Michael Fassbender, often reminded that they tried to speak Irish more as being prouder of their heritage, but he eventually left Naoise and her mother for evading the police due to his political activities during that time, and this certainly hurts both Naoise and his mother, who has never left their house since that point.

When Liam and Naoise are going through another hedonistic night of drug and music along with many other young people during one evening, the police ambush them all, and Liam is arrested while Naoise manages to escape. At the police station, Liam pretends that he does not know English at all, and that is how JJ, who incidentally works as a music teacher at some local school, is brought to the police station for functioning as a translator instead of his activist wife.

During the interrogation, JJ takes away Liam’s little notebook as asked by Liam, and that notebook contains something to interest JJ. After reading several song lyrics written in Irish, JJ attempts to juxtapose one of them with one of a piece of beat music created by himself, and, what do you know, the result is good enough to prompt him to do more. After subsequently meeting Liam and Naoise, they decide to make more hip-hop songs together in JJ’s little private space, and they also do a lot of drug just for more fun and excitement for themselves

Their first public performance, which is held at a little local pub, is not so successful to say the least, but, of course, someone eventually shoots their modest performance, and their music soon goes viral on the Internet in addition to causing the unexpected controversy in Belfast. As JJ’s wife and many other local activists and people demand that Irish should be recognized as a public language, the music and lyrics of Kneecap certainly draw more attention due to the sensitive contents, and that makes JJ quite conflicted – even while hiding his identity in public because he may lose his job because of his little musical activity.

In case of Liam and Naoise, they also find themselves facing a big problem as their popularity grows more and more day by day. A local republican paramilitary group is not so pleased about Kneecap because Kneecap causes a lot of trouble via not only its wild rap songs but also drug, and they are certainly ready to suppress Kneecap as much as possible just like the local police.

Around that narrative, we should care more about the main characters of the film, but the movie does not seem to have much thought and point on the serious aspects of their reckless musical activities. Sure, their music can bring some life and attention to their local language for the younger generation, but, as reflected by the rather disapproving stance of JJ’s wife, it can also be regarded as the thoughtless vandalism on Irish, and, not so surprisingly, Naoise’s father is not so amused by what his son is doing.

During the last act, the movie leans more on plot contrivance, but it is still supported well by its fairly good soundtrack. When everything culminates to what is going to be a major public breakthrough for Kneecap, Peppiatt and his crew members including cinematographer Ryan Kernaghan pull all the stops as demanded, and the result is fun and exciting as expected.

Regardless of how much their performances in the film are actually overlapped with their real lives, the three lead actors of the film are engaging in their unadorned acting, and the chemistry among them is always palpable whenever they perform together on the screen. In case of several supporting performers around them, Josie Walker, Fionnuala Flaherty, Jessica Reynolds, and Simone Kirby are rather under-utilized due to their underwritten characters, and the same thing can be said about Fassbender, who simply fills his thankless role as much as possible.

In conclusion, “Kneecap”, which received the NEXT Audience Award when it was premiered at the Sundance Film Festival early in last year, could be more improved in terms of story and character, and, after observing what is shown during its end credits, I wonder now whether their story would be more interesting if it were presented via a documentary instead. Sure, I had some fun during my viewing, but, folks, the movie could delve into its main subject more in my trivial opinion.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Naked Lunch (1991) ☆☆☆(3/4): Welcome to Interzone

David Cronenberg’s 1991 film “Naked Lunch”, which happens to come to South Korean theaters shortly after the local theatrical release of Luca Guadagnino’s “Queer” (2024), tackles on an impossible task, and the result is alternatively interesting and baffling. Loosely based on William S. Burroughs’ controversial novel of the same name and his own messy (and dopey) life, the movie attempts to present a despairing hell of addiction driven by a stream of drugged conscience, and you may admire its bold cinematic experience even while often feeling repulsed or disoriented a lot during your viewing. 

The early part of the film effectively sets its dryly petrified tone right from the beginning. It is 1953, New York City, and William Lee (Peter Weller), who is virtually a fictional version of Burroughs himself, has earned his meager living as a bug exterminator, but things have not gone particularly that well for him and his wife Joan (Judy Davis). It turns out that he frequently runs out of bug powder during his worktime, and, what do you know, both he and his wife, who happen to be addicts still far from clean and sober, are seriously addicted to bug powder (Don’t ask me how the hell that toxic substance can make them high).

When his mind does not crave for another dose of drug, Lee often spends time with his two fellow Beat Generation writer friends, who are apparently the fictional version of Jack Kerouac and Allen Ginsberg. They talk and discuss a lot about writing, but Lee’s mind seems mostly disaffected and disinterested, and he finds himself more and more addicted to the bug powder – even after he attempts to get some medical help from a shady local doctor introduced to him later by one of his colleagues.

 In the end, there comes a shocking tragic incident which did happen in Burroughs’ real life. While quite high and dopey due to their latest moment of drug abuse, Lee attempts what he and his wife call “William Tell Game”, and this accidentally leads to his wife’s unfortunate death, which consequently turns his life upside down. Around that point, Lee is so addicted to the bug powder and some other substances that he begins to experience one hallucination after another, and one of them features a big bug talking to him via a big rear orifice which does look more like a sphincter on big screen due to some little hairy details. 

Now you may sense that Lee is not only a junkie but also a conflicted gay dude not so comfortable with his sexuality as reflected by the morbidly sexual aspects observed from some of his crazy hallucinations in the film. As depending more and more on his substances of choice, Lee’s mind eventually enters a place called “Interzone”, and this supposedly imaginary exotic place, which often looks like a secondhand version of Casablanca, Morocco, is packed with handsome local gay lads as well as a bunch of odd people who come and then go around Lee as fueling his anxiety and paranoid more and more.

One of these strange figures, who is also a writer just like him, has a wife who exactly looks like Lee’s wife and is also played by Davis. Lee naturally gets attracted to this woman who seems relatively sharper than his dead wife, and the movie later gives us a very strange moment of writing and sex as they try a bit on a kinky Arabic typewriter belonging to her husband.

Around that narrative point, I kept scratching my head again as wondering more about Lee’s actual state of mind, but I admire Cronenberg’s uncompromising exploration on what makes Lee (and Burroughs) tick. Because of Burroughs’ deliberately random writing style coupled with a lot of morbid and freakish sexualization beyond NC-17 rating, the faithful movie adaptation of his novel is nonsense from the start, so Cronenberg chooses to go for the collage of the fragments of the novel and Burroughs’ life instead, and you will appreciate that more if you are familiar with his life and writing career. Thanks to cinematographer Peter Suschitzky, the overall atmosphere of the film is deliberately drab and dispirited with a palpable sense of misery, fear, and despair beneath the surface, and that is further accentuated by the ominous score by Howard Shore, who closely collaborated with legendary jazz musician Ornette Coleman for injecting some free jazz style to the film.

The main cast members flawlessly tune their performance to the detached overall tone of the movie. Peter Weller ably embodies the pathetically hollow state of his character’s mind, and it is clear that he studied a lot of that distinctive appearance and speech pattern of Burroughs, who was incidentally still alive when the movie was made. On the opposite, Judy Davis, who came to show the considerable range of her immense talent via this film and the Coen Brothers’ “Barton Fink” (1991) in the same year, is terrific in her dual performance, and several notable performers including Ian Holm, Julian Sands, and Roy Scheider are also solid as some of those odd denizens of Interzone. 

On the whole, “Naked Lunch” is often interesting for its mood, detail, and performance, but I must warn you that it can also be a little too weird and distant for some of you. I do not think it is one of Cronenberg’s best works, but, like many of Cronenberg’s cult films such as “Videodrome” (1982), it will definitely make you quite uncomfortable and baffled, and you will probably never forget all those weird stuffs in the movie.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Saving Private Ryan (1998) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): Just for one private

Steven Spielberg’s 1998 film “Saving Private Ryan”, which happens to be re-released in South Korean on this Wednesday, definitely earns its own place in the pantheon of war movies via its stupefyingly stunning opening battle sequence, but it is much more than that. This is a seemingly modest but undeniably powerful drama about nobility, brutality, vulnerability, and humanity, and its somber but indelible human qualities do not age at all just like a number of impressive battle sequences in the film.

After the brief prologue scene, the movie goes straight into in the middle of the Normandy Landings on June 6th, 1944. While this big military operation of the Allied Forces was quite successful enough to change the course of the World War II on the whole, hundreds of soldiers were killed right from when they arrive at the beach of Normandy, and the movie often overwhelms us with its horrifyingly realistic depiction of chaos, violence, and death as steadily following Captain John H. Miller (Tom Hanks) and many other American soldiers around him. Yes, there had already been many movies showing that war is indeed hell, but Spielberg and his crew members including editor Michael Kahn and cinematographer Janusz Kamiński, both of who deservedly won an Oscar for this film, pushed the envelope for more visceral verisimilitude, and the commercial/artistic success of the movie opened the door for its numerous juniors ranging from Ridley Scott’s “Black Hawk Down” (2001) to Mel Gibson’s “Hacksaw Ridge” (2016).     

Not long after Captain Miller and several soldiers under his command manage to survive and then win their big battle in the end, they receive an unexpected assignment. One mother living in some rural area of Iowa, US happened to lose three of her four enlisted sons within a short time, and the Chief of Staff of the US Army eventually decides that one remaining son, Private James Francis Ryan (Matt Damon), must be safely returned to his mother right now. However, Private Ryan was already sent to somewhere around Normandy along with many other soldiers of his division, and it is Captain Miller’s job to locate and then retrieve him as soon as possible.

As Captain Miller and several soldiers selected by him for this little but supposedly important mission move from one dangerous region after another for finding Private Ryan, some of his men naturally come to have questions and doubts on whether their mission is really necessary from the beginning. Yes, they are simply following the order as demanded, and they are supposed to do the morally right thing for Private Ryan’s dear mother, but putting no less than 8 men into a lot of danger just saving one person does not make sense much to them – especially whenever they face more of how risky their mission can be. 

Along their perilous journey, the movie expectedly gives us one battle sequence after another, and these battle sequences are skillfully handled under the masterful direction of Spielberg, who incidentally won his second Best Director Oscar for this film (The movie lost to John Madden’s “Shakespeare in Love” (1998) in case of Best Picture Oscar, by the way). Each of them is intense and compelling in one way or another, and the restrained score by Spielberg’s another usual collaborator John Williams wisely steps back completely, while mostly focusing more on the enormous human cost of war reflected by their bitter aftermath.

Between these striking battle sequences, Spielberg and his screenplay writer Robert Rodat gradually and thoughtfully develop several main characters in the story, and these characters’ little personal moments are balanced well between humor and drama. Yes, they do merely look like familiar archetypes expected from your average war drama flick at first, but they come to show their personality and humanity along the story bit by bit, and that is why we come to pay more attention to what is being at stake for them as they go through one peril after another.

And we also come to know and admire more of Captain Miller’s quiet but aching human aspects. Tom Hank is surely no stranger to playing a man of decency and integrity just like James Stewart, but his earnest low-key performance here in this film, which received an Oscar nomination, is one of the best moments in his career. Even when his rather taciturn character does not seem to signify much on the surface, we clearly sense a plain good man dutifully trying to do his best for not only accomplishing his mission but also surviving the war, and Hanks ably exerts a gentle but strong leadership over the other main cast members around him.

As revisiting the film yesterday, I was particularly impressed by how a bunch of recognizable performers are effectively cast in their respective supporting roles. Tom Sizemore, Edward Burns, Jeremy Davies, Vin Diesel, Adam Goldberg, Barry Pepper, and Giovanni Ribisi are believable along with Hanks as one solid bunch, and Matt Damon, who just rose to his emerging stardom after winning a Best Screenplay Oscar for Gus van Sant’s “Good Will Hunting” (1997) along with his best friend Ben Affleck, is an almost perfect casting choice. In addition, you may also notice Ted Danson, Harve Presnell, Nathan Fillion, Bryan Cranston, and Paul Giamatti appearing in small but crucial supporting parts, and it is fun to see how Giamatti, who eventually became one of the best character actors working in Hollywood, showed considerable potential even at that point (He also appeared in Peter Weir’s “The Truman Show” (1998) in the same year, by the way).

On the whole, “Saving Private Ryan” is one of the best films from Spielberg besides remaining as an excellent war drama film to be admired and appreciated. Besides recognizing the huge human sacrifice behind the biggest war in the 20th century, the movie also makes a humble but poignant human answer to the central question of the story, and, considering how our world may be entering another grim time of brutality and inhumanity right now, that is something we should always remember regardless of whatever will happen to us and our world next.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment