Shadow of the Vampire (2000) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): Filmmaking with the Vampire

F.W. Murnau’s “Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror” (1922) has been regarded as one of the greatest silent horror films for many good reasons, and one of them is the striking image of its titular character. Although the film itself was virtually the unauthorized film adaptation of that famous vampire novel by Bram Stoker, Murnau and his leading actor Max Schreck created one of the creepiest vampire characters in the movie history, and their result remains, shall we say, undead as residing somewhere deep beneath those countless vampire movies coming after this great film.

Inspired by the undeniably vivid and striking appearance of Schreck in “Nosferatu”, E. Elias Merhige’s 2000 film “Shadow of the Vampire” attempts to develop one darkly amusing premise: what if Murnau actually hired a real vampire as his leading actor at that time? This surely sounds pretty preposterous to say the least, but the movie handles this utterly unbelievable premise as seriously as possible for working as a deadpan one-joke horror comedy, and the overall result is further enhanced by another memorable vampire performance which deserves to be compared with Schreck’s in the 1922 movie.

At first, the movie observes the ongoing filmmaking process of Murnau, played by John Malkovich, and his cast and crew members in Berlin, 1921. While those financiers of his have been rather nervous about the production, Murnau is quite confident about completing the production according to his grand vision, and his cast and crew members dutifully follow his direction even though they are not so sure about what their movie is about, let alone how it is about. Once their job at the studio is done, they are going to shoot the rest of the film in a number of outdoor locations selected by Murnau in advance, but, to their confusion and bafflement, they are not informed much on what and how they are going to shoot the film in these locations.

Above all, they have not met its leading actor yet. All they know about Max Schreck so far is that he is very, very, very serious about playing his role as realistically as possible, and they become all the more curious about him as they later go to their first outdoor location, which happens to be located in Czechoslovakia. According to Murnau, Schreck, who is still not shown to them even at this point, has already been there for a while because of getting immersed more into the mood of the location, and it seems the location is indeed an ideal place for that. For example, the old inn in which Murnau and his cast and crew members except Schreck are going to stay has a shabby but authentic sense of history and superstition, and, besides using the inn for shooting several scenes of his film, Murnau is willing to hire several local people just for the extra authenticity from their mere presence.

When Schreck, played by Willem Dafoe, finally appears in front of everyone for shooting his first scene in the film, he does not disappoint Murnau and his cast and crew members at all. As a matter of fact, he looks so eerie and disturbing right from the beginning that nobody complains much about his rather eccentric conditions. He wants to shoot his scenes only during nighttime, and Murnau emphasizes to others that Schreck does not need any makeup because he always prepares himself in advance. Regardless of whether the camera is rolling or not, Schreck is always supposed to embody his character, and this professional commitment of his must be respected all the time.

The movie does not hide Schreck’s true identity and his unspeakable nature at all, and that is where its dark fun comes from. It soon turns out that Murnau made a heinous deal with Schreck for making him play the leading character of Murnau’s film, and Schreck is already quite excited for what he is going to get once his last scene is shot, though he still cannot help but driven by his insatiable thirst for blood. In fact, he has already been feeding on one of the key crew members, and this surely exasperates his director a lot (“Why him, you monster? Why not the… script girl?” – “Oh. The script girl. I’ll eat her later.”).

As Murnau and Shreck are constantly engaged in their morbid tug-of-war in front of and behind the camera, the screenplay by Steven Katz makes an interesting juxtaposition of vampirism and filmmaking besides becoming a deranged tale of artistic ambition and exploitation. While Schreck can be regarded as your typical troublesome star actor, Murnau comes to us as your average megalomaniac movie director willing to do anything in the name of art. And I am sure that there are millions of professionals in movie business field who will see a lot of themselves from what the other characters around Murnau and Schreck have to endure and suffer throughout the film. After all, the essence of filmmaking is sort of sucking the life and spirit of whatever is happening right in front of the camera and then immortalizing that on film, and even Schreck shrewdly recognizes this aspect when he has another argument with Murnau at one point. After watching the movie, you will probably think twice about how some famous filmmakers like David Fincher or Stanley Kubrick tend to shoot the same scene more than 100 times.

Because many real-life characters in the story except Murnau are quite unknown to many of us in comparison, the movie freely pushes its story premise while also sticking close to its original source of inspiration. Besides inserting a number of key shots from “Nosferatu”, the movie also recreates several other memorable moments of “Nosferatu” as Murnau and his cast and crew members keep making their film despite a series of unfortunate incidents. When Fritz Arno Wagner (Cary Elwes) arrives later in the story as the new cinematographer for Murnau, things get rolling more smoothly than before, and then there finally comes their leading actress Greta Schroeder (Catherine McCormack). Despite a little personal problem of hers, this young and beautiful actress is ready for her closeup, while having no idea on what her director is going to do to her during the shooting of her last scene.

As heading toward its inevitable finale a bit too hurriedly during its third act, the movie stumbles more than once, but it still holds our attention thanks to its palpably spooky atmosphere generated on the screen under Merhige’s skillful direction. He and his cinematographer Lou Bogue fills the screen a number of nice period details to be appreciated by the audiences familiar with “Nosferatu”, and the melancholic score by Dan Jones subtly suggests the darkness hovering around the characters in the film while occasionally accentuating several impressive moments in the film. One of such moments is a surprisingly poignant scene where Schreck unexpectedly gets what he has yearned for many centuries while he is playing a bit with a movie camera, and this indelible moment leaves a much more powerful impression than a similar one in Neil Jordan’s “Interview with the Vampire” (1994).

It goes without saying that the movie lives and dies with the unforgettable performance by Dafoe, who deservedly received an Oscar nomination for that. With his sharply gaunt appearance, Dafoe is born to play devilish figures to say the least, but he goes further here as fully immersing himself into his character, and he gives us a chillingly grand performance to be savored in many aspects. While deliberately exaggerated at times to our amusement, he never overlooks his character’s sheer depravity, but he also somehow earns our pity as ably conveying to us his character’s remaining humanity. When Schreck happens to discuss a bit with two other characters on Stoker’s novel, Dafoe and the movie delve quite deep into the misery and despair of being a vampire for centuries, and that will certainly remind you that being a bloodsucker forever is not as cool as shown in those Twilight flicks.

Although Dafoe virtually steals the show, the other main performers in the film are also wonderful in their respective roles. I must tell you that Murnau in real life was actually quite a nice and sensitive person, but Malkovich is often fun to watch while looking as smug and arrogant as demanded, and he and Dafoe complement well each other as carrying the film together. As Murnau‘s ever-suffering cast and crew members, Carry Elwes, Eddie Izzard, John Aden Gillet, and Udo Kier are enjoyable in their colorful supporting performance, and Catherine McCormack brings some jolliness to the film before her character belatedly comes to realize the terrifying fact behind shooting her last scene.

Although it could push its story promise further for more fun and intrigue for us in my humble opinion, “Shadow of the Vampire” is still a very compelling piece of work in addition to being one of better vampire films during recent years. It is a bit shame that Merhige mostly stepped away from filmmaking after his next feature film “Suspect Zero” (2004), but he gave us one excellent horror film to remember at least, and it will continue to be regarded as one of the highlights in Dafoe’s long and illustrious career.

This entry was posted in Movies and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.