All of You (2024) ☆☆☆(3/4): As they meet again and again

Posted on September 29, 2025 by kaist455

Apple TV+ movie “All of You”, which was released on last Friday, explores those tricky matters of heart via one complicated romantic relationship. Like many other love stories out there, it goes up and down as its two main characters pull or push each other along the story, and the overall result is fairly engaging thanks to the solid chemistry between its two lead performers.

At first, the movie quickly establishes its futuristic story premise. At some point in the future, there comes an amazing technology which can instantly identify one’s true soulmate via a simple test, and the opening scene shows many digital advertisements promoting that soulmate test, which emphasize how it has been successful and popular among millions of customers out there for years.

In case of Simon (Brett Goldstein) and Laura (Imogen Poots), both of them do not believe that much in that soulmate test, but they also cannot help but feel insecure about their longtime relationship. So far, they have been each other’s best friend, and they have never considered going further than that, but it does not take much time for us to sense the growing romantic vibe between them during their very first scene in the film.

As a matter of a fact, that is the main reason why Simon convinces Laura to take that soulmate test, but both of them are pretty casual about however their relationship will be changed by the result of the test. After all, they have just been supposed to be no more than very close friends, so it looks like they can remain same to each other as before even though he does not turn out to be her soulmate.

The story moves forward to a point not long after the test result comes out, and we see how things are indeed changed for both Simon and Laura. Via the result of the test, Laura is matched with some other nice guy instead, and Simon does not seem bothered about that on the surface. In fact, they are going to have a double date because Simon happens to be dating some other woman recommended by Laura, and we soon see these four people having a mostly pleasant dinnertime.

However, Simon cannot help but feel more attraction toward Laura, and Laura knows that while also feeling attracted to Simon more than ever. Yes, he is not supposed to be her soulmate, but she only finds herself emotionally depending on him more and more – especially when she is going through a period of loss and grief right after the death of a close family member of hers.

Not long after that point, Laura and Simon begin their romantic affair while not telling anything to others around them. This ironically helps and supports Laura’s relationship with her husband, and there is a little amusing moment when Laura’s husband sincerely confides in Simon about how much he appreciates Simon for being always there for his wife.

However, the screenplay by director/co-producer William Bridges and his co-producer/co-writer Brett Goldstein does not provide a simple answer for its two main characters’ complicated romantic circumstance. Sure, it is possible to both of them that soulmate test is not totally accurate, and Simon actually begins to consider going further with his relationship with Laura, but Laura hesitates for good reasons. Still caring a lot about her husband and their little daughter, she is not so sure about her relationship with Simon, and their situation becomes more difficult as their respective lives continue to bring more complications to their relationship.

While there eventually comes a moment when its two main characters face more of the inherent issues inside their relationship, the movie thankfully does not resort to going too melodramatic as handling the story and characters with enough care and sensitivity. Although there is not much detail outside their relationship, Simon and Laura are gradually fleshed out along the narrative as engaging figures to observe, and we come to care more about their relationship than before.

Furthermore, the movie is constantly buoyed by the good efforts from its two lead performers. Goldstein, who has been more prominent thanks to his Emmy-winning supporting performance in Apple TV+ series “Ted Lasso”, shows the more serious side of his acting talent, and Imogen Poots, who has recently appeared in a number of notable films including Oscar-winning film “The Father” (2020), complements her co-star well with her equally sensitive acting. Right from their first scene in the film, we can instantly sense a long history between their characters, and that comes to function as the firm ground for the dynamic relationship drama unfolded between their characters along the story. As the two small but crucial supporting characters in the story, Zawe Ashton and Steven Cree hold each own small spot well around Goldstein and Poots, and Ashton is especially good when her character silently senses whatever is going on between Simon and Laura early in the story.

In conclusion, “All of You” can be regarded as another typical romance drama, but it still holds our attention mainly thanks to a number of intimate moments generated between its two lead performers. Personally, I doubt whether our matters of heart will ever be under any kind of control in the future, but the movie interested and then touched me with its bittersweet qualities, and that is enough for recommendation for now.

Posted in Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment

Red Nails (2024) ☆☆☆(3/4): Mother and daughter stuck with each other again

Posted on September 28, 2025 by kaist455

South Korean independent film “Red Nails” calmly but sensitively observes the strained mother and daughter relationship between its two deeply flawed human characters. Although we do not like these two people much even at the end of the story, the movie lets us have some understanding on their problematic relationship at least, and we come to sense a little bit of hope and optimism even though nothing is bright or certain for either of them.

At the beginning of the story, we meet Hong-i (Jang Sun), a woman in late 30s who is going to take her senile mother Seo-hee (Byun Joong-hee) from a nursing home to her little residence in Seoul. On the surface, Hong-i seems to care a lot about her mother’s welfare, but it soon turns out that she has a very selfish motive behind her back. Because she has been struggling to pay off a substantial amount of loan debt, Hong-i really needs the money belonging to her mother, and we subsequently see her using some of her mother’s money for paying off a bit of her loan debt not long after her mother begins to stay at her residence.

In case of Seo-hee, she seems to appreciate her daughter’s phony generosity, but it does not take much for us to sense how much she and her daughter have been estranged from each other for years. Although she occasionally shows some care and attention toward her daughter, this only annoys her daughter instead, and Hong-i has no problem at all with having her mother be taken care of by an old friend of her mother whenever she is busy with her work outside.

As the movie patiently observes the growing strain between its two main characters, we come to see more of how messy and pathetic Hong-i’s daily really is. Besides working at some construction site, she also works at a little private academy for old ladies around her mother’s age, and, despite her sincere efforts, she often stumbles in case of handling her old students, as shown from one brief scene between her and one of them. In addition, she has been in a rather unhealthy relationship with some dude, but she still does not consider breaking up with him for a self-serving reason, even though she is about to have a date with some other guy who seems much nicer in comparison.

And we also come to see more of how insensitive and unpleasant Seo-hee can be at times. While she certainly needs a lot of care and attention due to her worsening medical condition, Seo-hee is not a nice old lady at all, and this aspect of hers becomes all the more evident when she suddenly feels like being insulted for her illness at one point later in the story.

As the mood becomes more distant between her and her daughter along the story, we come to sense more of the remaining pain and resentment between them. We are not so surprised when Hong-i finally reaches to her breaking point, and we also come to wonder more about the past between Hong-i and her mother, but the screenplay by director/writer Hwang Seul-gi, who incidentally made a feature film debut here, does not try to explain too much as simply focusing more on the personality and humanity of its two unlikable but engaging main characters. We continue to wince as observing more of their respective human flaws, but their gradual conflict along the story holds our attention to the end, and we become all the more interested and engaged in their bumpy psychological drama.

It surely helps that the movie is steadily supported by how effortlessly its two lead actresses complement each other throughout its rather short running time (86 minutes). Jang Sun, who was terrific as the hard-working mother of the young heroine of Lee Ji-eun’s impressive debut feature film “The Hill of the Secrets” (2022), looks quite different here in a very passive and subdued appearance, and she is utterly uncompromising as making no excuse on her character’s many unpleasant sides. Yes, Hong-i is often quite unwise and foolish to say the least, but Jang’s nuanced low-key performance lets us have some understanding on Hong-i’s pathetic behaviors, even though we often observe her from the distance. On the opposite, Byun Joong-hee, a 75-year-old actress who has appeared in a number of notable films such as “Star of Ulsan” (2024) during last several years since she started her acting career in 2014, holds her own place well besides her co-star, and she is particularly good when Seo-hee makes a silent but firm decision for her as well as her daughter around the end of the story.

It must be pointed out that the movie shares several common things with Kim Se-in’s stunning debut feature film “The Apartment with Two Women” (2021), which also examines one very troubling mother and daughter relationship in addition to having Lee Yoo-Kyeong as one of the crucial supporting characters in the story. In my inconsequential opinion, “The Apartment with Two Women” is relatively more compelling because of being equipped more energy and edginess, but “Red Nails” is still a fairly solid drama film to be appreciated for its sensitive thoughtful handling of story and characters, and its good moments are already growing on me as I write more and more about it here in this review.

On the whole, “Red Nails” is a modest but interesting character drama, and Hwang, who previously worked in Yoon Ga-eun’s unforgettable first feature film “The World of Us” (2016), demonstrates here that she is another new South Korean filmmaker to watch. In short, this is another notable debut feature film of this year in South Korean cinema, and it will surely be interesting to see whether Hwang will advance more like many of other rising new South Korean filmmakers during last 10 years.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Lee (2023) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4): What she recorded with her camera

Posted on September 28, 2025 by kaist455

Lee Miller was surely a remarkable woman to remember. Despite sexism and many other obstacles in front of her, this exceptional American woman willingly pursued her professional passion during the World War II, and her numerous photographs shot during that period are certainly another valuable historical record on the horror and tragedy of the World War II.

However, Ellen Kuras’ “Lee”, which happens to be released belatedly in South Korean theaters, does not satisfy me enough as merely following Miller’s life and career during the 1930-40s. While there are some good moments illuminating Miller’s female perspective on the war to some degree, the movie remains to be your average biographical drama film, and that is a shame considering the solid efforts shown from the screen.

Miller is played by Kate Winslet, who is no stranger to playing strong female figures like Miller. The movie begins with a private interview between older Miller and some young man in 1977, and the bitter and sardonic attitude of older Miller is contrasted with the following scene showing how she was wild and lively during the late 1930s. While she initially worked as a model, Miller subsequently started to pursue the career of a professional photographer, and she became all the more determined about that even after she married Roland Penrose (Alexander Skarsgård), a handsome British artist she came across during a little afternoon party with her close friends.

Not long after Miller and her husband got married, World War II began, and that was when she went further for her professional career. Around the time when her husband joins the British Army, she gets hired as a photographer in Vogue magazine, and she begins to photograph how British people endure the frequent bombings by Nazi Germany, but that is still not enough for her at all. She wants to go to the frontlines of the ongoing war just like many of those male photographers, but, of course, she is not allowed to do that at first mainly because of sexism.

Nevertheless, Miller eventually finds the solution for her problem, and we soon see her arriving in Normandy, France along with her fellow American photojournalist David Scherman (Andy Samberg) shortly after the Normandy Landings in June 1944. Again, she is reminded of how often she can be limited by the prevalent sexism among many male soldiers and officers, but she usually knows how to get things done, and her diligent efforts are appreciated a lot by both Scherman and her no-nonsense magazine editor Audrey Withers (Andrea Riseborough).

The war is being closer to the end around the point when Paris is liberated a few months later, but that does not daunt Miller at all, and the movie sometimes presents how Miller’s female perspective leads her to some unforgettable moments to remember. At one point, she witnesses and records how several young women are cruelly punished for being associated with Nazi German soldiers, and this will remind you again of how often many women have been brutalized in countless wars throughout the human history.

In early 1945, Miller decides to delve more into whatever happened to thousands of civilians taken away by Nazi Germany during the war, and that is when the story becomes darker than before. She and Scherman eventually arrive in one big concentration camp in Germany, and both of them are certainly shocked and devastated by what they behold from this horrible place. Wisely restraining itself, the movie never overlooks the sheer horror and tragedy in what Miller and Scherman phlegmatically observe and record, and the result is the most effective moment in the film.

However, the screenplay by Liz Hannah, John Collee, and Marion Hume, which is based on Miller’s only son Antony Penrose’s 1985 biography “The Lives of Lee Miller”, is rather superficial in the presentation of Miller’s life and career. Sure, the movie did a fairly competent job of presenting the high points of her career including that famous photograph shot in the bathroom of Adolf Hitler’s private apartment in Berlin, but it does not go deeper into her personality and humanity, and this weak aspect of its narrative is exacerbated more by the mostly under-developed supporting characters surrounding Miller.

Anyway, Winslet is dependable as usual at least, and her good performance steadily carries us to the predictably sentimental ending of the film. In case of several notable main cast members including Alexander Skarsgård, Marion Cotillard, Andrea Riseborough, Noémie Merlant, Josh O’Connor, and Andy Samberg, they are sadly under-utilized on the whole, though Samberg surprisingly demonstrates the more serious side of his acting talent in contrast to his usual comic persona.

Needless to say, director Ellen Kuras, who was Oscar-nominated for documentary film “The Betrayal” (2008) and also worked in a number of notable films and documentaries such as “Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind” (2004) and “Jane” (2017), tries to handle the main human subject of her film with care and respect, but I think “Lee” a bit too dissatisfying to recommend. Yes, I came to admire Miller’s life and career more after watching the film, but the movie itself does not go beyond what I can instantly learn via checking Wikipedia right now, and that is a disappointment in my humble opinion.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

No Other Choice (2025) ☆☆☆(3/4): Killing for employment

Posted on September 25, 2025 by kaist455

Park Chan-wook’s latest film “No Other Choice” is another dark and twisted genre piece you can expect from its director. Following its plain ordinary family guy’s murderous struggle for getting employed, the movie provides a series of morbidly humorous moments with an abundant amount of style and details to be appreciated, and that compensates for several weak aspects including its rather overlong running time (139 minutes).

Lee Byung-hun, who incidentally collaborated with Park in “Joint Security Area” (2000) 25 years ago, plays You Man-soo, a fortysomething dude who looks like having a fairly good life at the beginning of the story. He and his wife and two kids live in an old but well-decorated house, and the opening scene shows them cheerfully enjoying a little dinner party in the front ground of their house

However, it soon turns out that there is a serious problem at a big paper company where Man-soo has worked for more than 20 years. After recently acquired by a bunch of American businessmen, the company has gone through a lot of downsizing, and Man-soo belatedly realizes that he is one of numerous employees to be fired. During the next three months, he tries to get employed somewhere else in one way or another, but he only gets frustrated and again and again, while he and his family are going to lose their house and many other things for their increasingly difficult economic circumstance.

Not long after going thorough another moment of humiliation, Man-soo comes upon one possible idea. While there are a very few positions available for him, there are also many other desperately unemployed guys just like him, so he begins to consider eliminating several people who may be more likely to get employed than him. First, he posts a fake advertisement to lure a number of possible competitors out there, and we subsequently get an absurd scene where he thoroughly evaluates the résumés of these potential targets one by one for determining whom he must kill first.

The movie surely generates more uncomfortable laugh as its hero embarks on his killing plan in a rather clumsy way. He happens to have an old North Korean gun belonging to his dead father, which is incidentally more than 50 years old but seems to be still good enough for killing. He later spies on his first target for getting any chance to approach closer to this target, but, what do you know, he soon comes across a few setbacks which may jeopardize his plan.

Even while often recognizing how pathetic and desperate its hero is, the movie sticks to its detached attitude. While Man-soo is not so sympathetic from the beginning, most of man-soo’s several targets presented along the story are no better than him. As a result, we come to observe his following acts of killing from the distance without caring that much about him or others around him, and this aspect is more evident from how the movie presents the sequence showing Man-soo’s first attempt to kill under a deliberately loud sound background.

Nevertheless, the screenplay by Park and his co-writers Don McKellar, Lee Kyoung-mi, and Lee Ja-hye, which is based on Donald Westlake’s novel “The Ax” (It was already adapted once for the 2005 film of the same name by Costa-Gavras, to whom Park incidentally dedicates the movie), keeps engaging us with a lot of biting sense of black humor. At one point later in the film, Man-soo comes to use his certain particular set of skills for taking care of a dead body, and that leads to a gruesomely naughty moment to remember. In addition, the story also pays attention to how Man-soo’s relationship with his wife becomes increasingly strained as he hides his murderous secret more and more from her, and the movie even takes some time when this personal conflict between them culminates to an unexpectedly stylish moment of dance and music.

Above all, the movie is drenched in many numerous distinctive touches observed from many of Park’s previous films such as “Oldboy” (2003) and “Decision to Leave” (2022), and Park and his crew members including cinematographer Kim Woo-hyung and editor Kim Sang-bum did a commendable of filling the screen with enough mood and details. Thanks to a heap of interesting details inside and outside it, Man-soo’s house looks as impressive as that slick modern house in Bong Joon-ho’s “Parasite” (2019), and I particularly appreciate how the movie uses a certain favorite color of Park as frequently as many of Pedro Almodóvar’s movies did green and red.

While Lee holds the center as required with another fine performance in his acting career, several other cast members dutifully fill their respective spots around him. Son Ye-jin, who was memorable in “The Truth Beneath” (2016), has several good moments as her character is getting closer to Man-soo’s growing secret, and Park Hee-soon, Lee Sung-min, Yeom Hye-ran, and Cha Seung-won are well-cast in their substantial supporting parts.

Overall, “No Other Choice”, which was recently chosen as the South Korean submission to Best International Film Oscar, is not entirely without flaws (For example, its finale could be shortened a bit, and I also do not think a certain notable supporting actor, whose career was tarnished by alleged sexual harassment a few years ago, is really necessary), but it is another compelling work from Park, who has been one of the most prominent South Korean filmmakers during last 25 years. Although it does not reach to the level of “The Handmaiden” (2016) or “Decision to Leave”, the movie intrigued and engaged me enough on the whole, and that is more than enough for now.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Linda Linda Linda (2005) ☆☆☆(3/4): Their little high school performance

Posted on September 21, 2025 by kaist455

2005 Japanese film “Linda Linda Linda”, which was re-released in South Korean theaters a few days ago, is a conventional but undeniably likable mix of drama, comedy, and music. Right from the beginning, we get a pretty good idea about how it will eventually end, and the movie does not exceed our expectation much on the whole, but it keeps holding our attention via its solid storytelling as well as the spirited efforts from its main cast. In the end, you will root and then cheer for its main characters more than before, and the movie surely delivers its expected feel-good moments as delightfully as possible.

During the first act, the movie gradually establishes its four main characters one by one. For their upcoming school festival, Kei (Yuu Kashii), Kyoko (Aki Maeda), and Nozomi (Shiori Sekine), who are the students of some high school located in some local city outside Tokyo, are supposed to perform as the members of their little band, but there is one big problem. Not long after their guitarist Moe (Shione Yukawa) happened to get seriously injured in her left hand, Kei clashed with their vocalist Rinko (Takayo Mimura), and this eventually made Rinko quit the band.

While Kei, who has incidentally been the keyboardist of the band, could play a guitar instead, she and the remaining band members still need someone to perform as their vocalist, and they happen to come across an unlikely figure for that role. That figure in question is none other than Son (Bae Doona), a South Korean exchange student who has been pretty much like your average loner in the school due to her rather clumsiness in speaking Japanese. Although Son is not so sure about whether she can sing well in Japanese, Kei and her two fellow band members impulsively decide to have Son join their band, and Son begins to practice singing in Japanese while her new friends also start to prepare for the upcoming performance of theirs.

The screenplay by director Nobuhiro Yamashita and his co-writers Kōsuke Mukai and Wakako Miyashita takes its time as leisurely rolling its main characters from one intimate episodic moment to another. Because they do not have much time for practice from the start, they even sneak into the practice room in their school at night, and, to our little amusement, they naturally come to suffer a lot of sleep deficiency later.

And we get to know more about them bit by bit. While she can be frigid at times, Kei is the one steadily holding the center, and Kyoko and Nozomi willingly stand by Kei via their shared passion on music. We often cannot help but notice more of the language gap between these three girls and Son, but they sincerely support and encourage Son as much as possible, and Son comes to show more dedication as befriending them more along the story.

In addition, the movie pays some extra attention to a number of supporting characters in the story. There is an amusing subplot between Kyoko and a male schoolmate eager to be her boyfriend someday, and then we get a humorously awkward moment between Son and some boy who has clearly been having a crush on her (His clumsy speaking in Korean is certainly extra amusement for me and my fellow South Korean audiences, by the way). As the high school festival begins later in the story, the school is filled with more spirit and excitement as its students actively participate in a number of various stuffs ranging from cooking to running a fun house, and there is a little funny moment involved with the teacher supervising the festival, who turns out to be more understanding than he seemed at first.

During the last act, there naturally comes some suspense on whether its main characters will arrive in time for performing on the stage, but the movie does not hurry itself at all as slowly doling out several good moments. Certain two supporting characters boldly come forward at the last minute for buying some time for Kei and the other band members and, what do you know, their impromptu performances turn out to be more effective than expected. Although the dream sequence right before the finale is rather distracting to me, I enjoyed its absurd touches at least, and I also like a brief but crucial moment between Kei and Rinko, who comes to show a bit of support despite the remaining resentment between them.

The movie depends a lot on the good ensemble performance from its main cast members. Besides effortlessly interacting with her fellow cast members, Bae Doona, a South Korean actress who has steadily advanced as appearing in a diverse array of films ranging from Hirokazu Kore-eda’s “Air Doll” (2009) to the Wachowski films “Cloud Atlas” (2012) and “Jupiter Ascending” (2015) has a couple of showstopper moments to remember, and she also did a commendable job in case of the musical performance scenes including the climactic moment when her character must sing well “Linda Linda”, a hit song from the Japanese punk rock band the Blue Hearts. In case of Aki Maea, Yu Kashii, and Shiori Sekine, they have each own moment to shine just like their Korean co-star, and several substantial supporting performers including Takayo Mimura, Shione Yukawa, and Yuko Yamazaki are also well-cast in their respective roles.

Overall, “Linda Linda Linda” remains as a solid crowd-pleaser with a lot of energy and charm although 20 years have passed since it came out. It may look rather plain and modest compared to the more prominent achievements in Japanese Cinema during the 2000s such as Hayao Miyazaki’s “Spirited Away” (2001) or Kiyoshi Kurosawa’s “Tokyo Sonata” (2008), and it still entertained me and the other audiences around me, and that is more than enough for recommendation in my trivial opinion.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

You Burn Me (2024) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4): On desire and life

Posted on September 21, 2025 by kaist455

Argentine filmmaker Matías Piñeiro’s latest film “You Burn Me” often baffled and confounded me for good reasons. Probably because I do not have much background knowledge on the main subjects of this experimental film, I simply observed the repeated images and quotes without enough interest, and it was a rather challenging experience on the whole despite its rather short running time (64 minutes).

At least, I knew a bit about what and how the movie is about, because I happened to watch its trailer right before the screening I attended during this afternoon. As the trailer presents a series of seemingly random images, Piñeiro tells us a bit about how the movie will shuffle between the works of two different poets, and we are also introduced to his two lead actresses who will play the central figures of the film.

One of these two central figures is Sappho, a famous ancient Greek poet whose body of work deserves attention as much as her well-known homosexuality (I am sure that you all know well where that well-known word for female homosexuality came from, right?). Unfortunately, as often reflected throughout the film, many of her works have been preserved only in fragmented state, and the movie tells us later that only one of her works remains intact just because of being wholly quoted in the certain famous book of a contemporary male Greek poet.

The main ground for the narrative of the film is actually a chapter from the book of Italian poet Cesare Pavese (1908 ~ 1950), whose tragic death by suicide often resonates with how Sappho killed herself due to a matter of heart. In that part of Pavese’s book, Sappho has a private conversation with a nymph named Britomartis, and their following conversation on life and desire gradually takes the center as the film steadily juxtaposes their words with a number of various images shot in various locations around the world.

Piñeiro and his co-cinematographer Tomás Paula Marques shot these images on 16mm films in the screen ratio of 1.33:1, and they deliberately made them look older and shabbier, probably for evoking the ancient aspects of the conversation between Sappho and Britomartis. As their conversation flows from one ancient Greek tale after another, the movie comes to reflect more on how desire has been a constant fact of human life just like it was a key factor in numerous ancient Greek tales such as “The Iliad” and “The Odyssey” by Homer, and both Sappho and Britomartis also mull a bit on how they were destroyed by desire in one way or another. While Sappho killed herself because of a big heartbreak involved with one certain young lady, Britomartis leapt into the sea for escaping from a man who desired her a lot, and there is a little amusing scene involved with a sketch showing how a certain body part of that dude was absurdly cursed due to his fierce desire toward Britomartis.

Piñeiro’s two lead actresses simply play a bit as Sappho and Britomartis in front of the camera or duly read the quotes from the works Sappho and Pavese. Sometimes these quotes are repeated more than once, and the accompanying images are also repeated along with that. Although this feels a bit frustrating at times, it is apparent that the movie expects us to reflect more on this direct juxtaposition between text and image, and you may also come to mull more on the feministic viewpoint on those ancient Greek tales. For example, how much Calypso felt betrayed and devastated when Ulysses eventually decided to return to his faithful wife after living with her for no less than 7 years? And how did Helen of Troy actually feel about all those epic conflicts surrounding her?

However, because I may not be emotionally matured yet despite being over 40, the words in the film feel rather abstract to me instead of genuinely resonating with my heart. Besides, I usually prefer prose to poetry as a guy inclined to being more direct and straightforward, so I must confess that I struggled over understanding the emotional aspects of whatever implied by those fragmented works of Sappho or the conversation between her and Britomartis in Pavese’s book.

Nevertheless, the movie succeeds to some degree in case of igniting more interest toward Sappho and Pavese from me. Although the movie just explains a bit about the circumstance surrounding his last days, Pavese looks like another interesting artist to explore for me, and I will certainly look for any way to get more access to his works. In case of Sappho, well, I come to learn from the film that she was really much more than a historical woman who originated the aforementioned word for female homosexuality, and I can only hope that more of her works will be discovered in the future, though that may be less possible as more time goes by.

In conclusion, “You Burn Me” did not exactly engage me enough, but it enlightened me a bit at least, and I became more aware of the career of Piñeiro, who has steadily made one film after another since his feature debut film “El hombre robado” (2007). Although “You Burn Me” is an acquired taste to me, I recognize that he is another interesting filmmaker with his own artistic style to notice, and I will probably appreciate more of his talent as watching more of his works in the past and the future. Yes, I am still hesitating to recommend the film to you, but I also want to tell you that it is still worthwhile to try – especially if you are willing to go for something different and challenging.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Roses (2025) ☆☆(2/4): A less vicious and funny remake

Posted on September 21, 2025 by kaist455

Jay Roach’s latest film “The Roses” is too mild and mellow for becoming truly mean and vicious enough to delve into the dark aspects of its story and characters. As unwisely trying to make the two main characters at the center of the story look more sympathetic and likable for us, the movie often becomes less sharp and thorny than it really needs to be, and its middling result is all the more disappointing, considering a bunch of genuinely talented performers gathered here in this film.

As many of you know, the movie is a remake of Danny DeVito’s 1989 black comedy film “The War of the Roses”, which is based on the novel of the same name by Warren Adler. In that movie, Michael Douglas and Kathleen Turner are darkly hilarious as a married couple going way over the top during their utterly hostile and destructive divorce war, and it is still quite funny to observe how DeVito’s film firmly and admirably sticks to the vicious and unpleasant aspects of its story and characters along with its two fearless lead performers.

In case of “The Roses”, it has Benedict Cumberbatch and Olivia Colman. Sure, these two immensely talented British performers can be as funny and vicious as Douglas and Turner in the 1989 film, but, alas, their undeniable comic talents are rather under-utilized here as often being prevented from being truly mean and funny. While their talents do shine a bit more during the third act where the situation becomes darker with more viciousness, that is too late for us, and the movie does not support them well even when it finally arrives at the ending along with them.

The movie opens with their characters, Theo and Ivy Rose, having a private meeting with their marriage counselor. As they interact more with their marriage counselor, it becomes quite apparent that they do have serious relationship issues between them, but they cannot believe that, as their marriage counselor points out, they are not actually capable of solving these problems.

And then they look back at how things felt all right between them when they came across each other in London 13 years ago. While Theo was a promising architecture, Ivy was a talented chef with a lot of potential (This may remind you of Colman’s recent Emmy-nominated guest appearance in American TV series “The Bear”, by the way), and they instantly clicked with each other right from their accidental encounter at a restaurant where Ivy worked. Not long after their first passionate lovemaking which will not be approved by any sensible health inspector out there, they decided to move to California in US, and Ivy devoted herself to domestic matters including raising their two children during next 10 years, while Theo focused more on his work and career.

When his latest building, a big and spectacular naval history museum which is going to be one of the biggest achievements in his career, is finished, Theo decides to buy an abandoned local restaurant house for showing more appreciation to Ivy, who is certainly delighted as finally getting a chance to show off her culinary skills outside their house. Although her modest restaurant business turns out to be far less successful than expected, she is still excited about finally restarting her professional career, and Theo is certainly happy for that.

However, there soon comes an unexpected change of fortune for Theo and Ivy. Their area is suddenly struck by a disastrous storm, which thoroughly destroys that naval history museum to the horror of Theo and many others who happen to be there with him. Meanwhile, this storm incidentally brings much more customers to Ivy’s restaurant at the same time, and, what do you know, one of these customers turns out to be a very influential food critic, who subsequently wrote an enthusiastic review on Ivy’s restaurant.

As his career tumbles toward the bottom, Theo has no choice but to focus on taking care of the domestic matters while Ivy becomes a lot busier and more successful than before. As time goes by, he cannot help but become petty and sulky about how things have changed in their relationship, and his wife also becomes more aware of the growing strain and estrangement between them.

The screenplay by Tony McNamara, who were previously Oscar-nominated for Yorgos Lanthimos’ “The Favourite” (2018) and “Poor Things” (2023), has some fun with how its two main characters clash with each other more and more along the story, but it unfortunately does not pull all the stops at all. We are occasionally amused by the increasingly bitter and vicious interactions between Theo and Ivy during their following divorce battle, but the movie often seems to hesitate to push them further into more nastiness, even though both Cumberbatch and Colman look like being quite ready for that from the very beginning.

Furthermore, the movie also fails in bringing more life and personality to those numerous supporting characters around Theo and Ivy. For example, their two kids are more or less than mere plot elements to come and then go, and the same thing can be said about a couple played by Andy Samberg and Kate McKinnon, both of whom can be quite funny just like Cumberbatch and Colman but are simply required to look just silly and absurd on the whole. The movie also criminally under-utilizes several other notable performers including Sunita Mani, Zoë Chao, Jamie Demetriou, and Ncuti Gatwa, though Allison Janney manages to steal the show during her brief appearance later in the film.

In conclusion, “The Roses” is just mildly amusing without feeling really biting at all, and my mind kept going back to those many darkly funny moments in the 1989 film, which does not lose any of its dark and vicious sense of humor even at present. While I enjoyed “The Roses” to some degree mainly thanks to the game efforts from Cumberbatch and Colman, they can do a lot better with much sharper and meaner materials in my inconsequential opinion, so I recommend you to stick to the 1989 film instead.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Oddity (2024) ☆☆☆(3/4): A piece of oddity

Posted on September 19, 2025 by kaist455

“Oddity” is a little but effective horror film which gradually reveals what it is about as patiently building up its creepy atmosphere and suspense along the story. While it is rather simple in terms of story and characters, the movie slowly unnerves us via a series of spooky moments to be appreciated, and it also shows a bit of morbid sense of humor at times.

The movie opens with a young woman working on the renovation a big old house located somewhere in a rural region of Ireland. Dani (Caroyln Braken) has to do the job alone by herself, and her psychiatrist husband Ted (Gwilym Lee) is mostly absent as being busy with doing his nighttime work at some mental hospital in a nearby city, but she has no problem with that as expecting to have a nice life with her husband in their house.

However, something quite unnerving happens to Dani at one night, and the movie quickly moves forward to one year later. We come to gather that she was brutally murdered, and it seems that one of Ted’s former patients, who suddenly came there during that time is the one responsible for her death, though he died not long after this horrible incident.

Anyway, Ted visits Dani’s visually impaired twin sister Darcy, who is also played by Carolyn Bracken. Darcy has run a little antique shop full of old odd things which are actually cursed according to her, and this may remind you of that spooky storage room often shown in “The Conjuring” (2013) and its several sequels. At the time of Ted’s visit, Darcy happens to be handling the latest addition to her rather creepy collection, and she willingly tells a bit about its sinister backstory, but Ted does not believe that much as a man of reason and science.

He also does not believe that Darcy is a sort of psychic capable of sensing the past or history from any personal object, though, as she requested, he brings her a personal object associated with that patient assumed to be the killer of his wife. As soon as Darcy touches that object in question, she instantly senses something quite disturbing, and she subsequently embarks on a little plan of hers.

Her plan is pretty simple. On one day which incidentally means a lot to her, Darcy suddenly comes to that big old house where Ted is living along with his current girlfriend Yana (Caroline Menton). Both Ted and Yana are not so amused for good reasons, but Ted cannot say no when Darcy insists that she should stay in the house at least for a day, and Yana is left alone with her after Ted goes out for another nighttime work at his mental hospital.

The mood between Darcy and Yana is quite awkward to say the least, especially after when it turns out that Darcy sent something strange to the house right before arriving there. It is an old wooden golem belonging to her family, and this odd big object surely unnerves Yana, though she also cannot help but become more curious about what the hell it is as well as what Darcy is going to do with that.

Although Darcy does not say a lot about the real purpose of her visit, the atmosphere inside the house becomes creepier as the night begins, and Yana comes to feel more of something spooky lurking somewhere inside the house. While that wooden golem certainly looks all the more ominous than before, it seems more possible that Darcy and Yana are not alone inside the house, and we later get a little effective moment of shock involved with a digital camera once belonging to Dani.

The movie also adds some extra creepiness as occasionally paying attention to Ted’s workplace, which looks so drab and depressing that we are not so surprised by more darkness and madness shown later in the story. Nevertheless, Ted seems mostly unaffected by this grim and depressing work environment, though he gets disturbed a bit by a bunch of odd and disconcerting sketches drawn by one of his patients.

It goes without saying that the movie becomes creepier with more dread and tension during the last act, which expectedly reveals what Darcy is actually planning to do behind her back. While there surely come a few expected moments of shock and awe, the movie sticks to its slow but steady narrative pacing as before, and director/writer Damian McCarthy and his crew members including Cinematographer Colm Hogan did a good job of filling the screen with enough interest to engage us. As the camera usually sticks to static positions, we come to pay more attention to background details, and we become more aware of whatever is hovering around its heroine and a few other main characters in the story. In addition, Bracken’s solid dual performance ably holds the emotional center of the movie, and she is also supported well by several effective supporting performers including Gwilym Lee and Caroline Menton.

In conclusion, “Oddity” is interesting for its competent handling of mood and story, and McCarthy, who previously made a solid feature film debut with “Caveat” (2020), confirms to us here that he is a skillful filmmaker who knows how to interest and then engage us. At this point, he is already working on his next film, and I guess we can have some expectations on whatever he will show us next.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Oslo (2021) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4): The negotiations behind the 1993 Oslo Peace Accords.

Posted on September 17, 2025 by kaist455

HBO TV movie “Oslo” cannot help but look rather naïve to me, considering how things have alarmingly gotten worse between Israel and Palestine since it came out four years ago. Yes, as dramatically presented in the film, there was a time when it seemed that both Israel and Palestine finally could recognize each other for real peace and co-existence, and the film looks into how hard and tricky it was for everyone associated with the behind-the-door negotiations leading up to the 1993 Oslo Peace Accords. However, even though I cared about the story and characters to some degree, I also often wondered what its main characters would think about the current political situation between Israel and Palestine, and that is what the movie cannot answer even at this point.

The story, which is based on the Tony-winning play by J.T. Rogers (He also adapted it for the film in addition to serving as one of the co-executive producers, by the way), is mainly told through a Norwegian diplomat named Mona Juul (Ruth Wilson) and her husband Terje Rød-Larsen (Andrew Scott), who is incidentally the director of the Fafo Foundation. They have been quite passionate about brokering a backdoor channel for negotiations between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), but the circumstance does not look optimistic for them to say the least. For example, the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs is not so willing to assist their ambitious diplomatic plan, and, above all, the Israeli government and PLO happen to be going through another big political conflict between them.

However, Juul and Rød-Larsen are determined to try as much as possible, and then there comes a breakthrough around early 1993. Juul persuades Ahmed Qurei (Salim Daw), Minister of Finance of the PLO, to come to a little private negotiation meeting to be held at a rural manor in Norway, and Rød-Larsen convinces the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs to send their unofficial representatives to that rural manor in Norway, though, not so surprisingly, nothing is guaranteed from the very beginning.

The movie generates some humorous moments when Qurei and his assistant Hassan Asfour (Waleed Zuaiter) meet Yair Hirschfeld (Dov Glickman) and Ron Pundak (Rotem Keinan), the two unofficial representatives of the Israeli government who are incidentally well-known university professors. Nevertheless, as these two contrasting groups push and pull each other over their negotiation under Juul and Rød-Larsen’s supposedly neutral support and guidance, they come to open themselves more to each other while also sticking to their respective beliefs and principles, and, what do you know, it gradually looks like they can actually initiate something quite meaningful for their countries.

However, not only they but also Juul and Rød-Larsen are also reminded more or more of how fragile their back-channel negotiation can be. While the Norwegian government remains reluctant to support this more despite some real progress from it, both the Israeli government and PLO continue to clash each other without much possibility for more compromise and negotiation. This surely generates more headache for Rød-Larsen and Juul, who come to realize that they also should accept some compromise for getting any chance for the eventual success of this ongoing negotiation process.

Rogers’ screenplay naturally provides a lot of talky moments as its main characters struggle to balance themselves between belief and compromise along the story, but the rather stagy ambiance of the movie may often distract you from time to time. In fact, several scenes in Israel are so jarringly tinged with warm orange tone that we cannot help but notice the apparent artificial qualities of these scenes, and I must tell you that this is probably one of the lowest points in the career of cinematographer Janusz Kamiński, who won two Oscars as frequently collaborating with Steven Spielberg for more than 30 years (Not so surprisingly, Spielberg is one of the co-executive producers of the film).

Director/co-executive producer Bartlett Sher, who also directed the 2017 Broadway production of Rogers’ play, simply lets the story and characters roll under his plainly unobtrusive direction, but there are several notable flaws in terms of storytelling. For instance, I do not think the flashback shots involved with Juul’s experience in Palestine are really necessary, and the movie could just trust our imagination when she reminisces about that in front of several other main characters later in the story.

At least, the main cast members hold our attention to the end. While never overshadowing their fellow main cast members, Ruth Wilson and Andrew Scott diligently hold the center as required, and they are particularly good whenever their characters come to show more of the strong personal/professional bond between them along the story. Around them, Itzik Cohen, Sasson Gabai, Dov Glickman, Rotem Keinan, Jeff Wilbusch, Igal Naor, and Waleed Zuaiter have each own moment to stand out, and the special mention goes to Salim Daw, a charismatic Palestinian Israeli actor who has been more notable thanks to his memorable supporting performance in the fifth season of Netflix drama series “The Crown”.

In conclusion, “Oslo” is surely a well-meaning movie, but it also undeniably feels like being out of touch as I reflect more on what happened during next several decades after the Oslo Peace Accords. Sure, we should not give up hope and optimism at all regardless of how the volatile historical narrative between Israel and Palestine will end, but the movie is not effective enough to suppress our growing doubt and skepticism at least for a while, and that is really a shame in my humble opinion.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Spirited Away (2001) ☆☆☆☆(4/4): A girl’s adventures in Miyazaki’s Wonderland

Posted on September 15, 2025 by kaist455

As revisiting Hayao Miyazaki’s 2001 animation feature film “Spirited Away” yesterday, I marveled again on the vivid and mesmerizing qualities of its endlessly fascinating fantasy world. Even though the movie does not explain that much on the whole, we instantly accept its singular magical world of spirits and creatures right from the start thanks to its confident handling of mood and details, and we are alternatively intrigued and touched by many of those unforgettable moments in the film.

The opening part introduces us to Chihiro Ogino (voiced by Rumi Hiiragi), a young little girl who is moving to somewhere along with her parents. When they seem to be near their destination, Chihiro’s father decides to take a shortcut through some remote forest area, and then they arrive at a gate leading to what simply looks like an abandoned resort town. Although Chihiro cannot help but feel quite nervous, her parents insist that they should look around whatever is in this abandoned area, and the film provides several lovely moments of serene beauty reminiscent of the finale of Miyazaki’s subsequent work “The Boy and the Heron” (2023) as they walk further into this oddly empty region.

Needless to say, it turns out that Chihiro’s instinctive feelings on this area were right. When she later happens to be alone by herself, she encounters a mysterious handsome boy named Haku (voiced by Miyu Irino), who warns that she and her parents must leave the area before the night comes. Alas, her parents are transformed into a couple of big pigs when she belatedly comes to them, and she soon gets trapped inside the area, which shows its hidden sides once the night begins and then a lot of odd entities appear here and there to Chihiro’s shock and surprise.

Again, Haku comes to the rescue. He takes Chihiro to a big bathhouse which is the center of this very strange area, and we come to gather that this is actually a spa region for millions of many different spirits to come and then go. The mood becomes a bit suspenseful as Chihiro must hide her true identity for a while under Haku’s instruction, but the film takes some time for paying more attention to this hidden magical world unfolded in front of her eyes, and that is a sheer visual feast for our eyes to say the least.

Thanks to some help from Haku and a couple of sympathetic bathhouse employees, Chihiro eventually encounters Yubaba (voiced by Mari Natsuki), an old but powerful witch who has ruled over the bathhouse and its numerous employees. While being as cranky and tempestuous as the Red Queen in Lewis Carroll’s classic children’s novel “Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland”, Yubaba eventually agrees to employ Chihiro in exchange for not transforming her into a piglet, but, of course, there is a catch. She literally takes away Chihiro’s name as giving her new name, and Chihiro must not forget her original name completely for not getting stuck in Yubaba’s world forever.

As Chihiro begins to work in Yubaba’s bathhouse as “Sen”, the story becomes a bit more leisurely as Miyazaki and his crew dole out one awe-inspiring moment after another. We get to look more into here and there in the bathhouse, and we admire more of its grand and intricate design which is an odd but striking cross between European and Japanese style. We see more of various spirit figures in the bathhouse, and you will be delighted for the appearance of those dust bunnies from Miyazaki’s great animation film “My Neighbor Totoro” (1988), which incidentally work for an old spirit taking care of the giant boiler inside the bathhouse with his six spider-like arms.

One of the most awesome highlights in the film comes when a highly stinky entity suddenly comes into the bathhouse. While it instantly shocks and repulses everyone in the bathhouse including Yubaba, Chihiro is ordered to handle this stinky client alone by herself, but, what do you know, her plucky efforts lead to an epic visual catharsis to behold, which also indirectly gives us a bit of environmental message to reflect on.

Meanwhile, we also get to know more about how much Haku has been held against his will under Yubaba, but, again, the movie takes time as moving onto the unexpected tranquility of its last act along with its young heroine. Along with her several unexpected spirit friends including a rather hideous entity nicknamed “No-Face”, she goes to a certain place outside the bathhouse by a sort of magic train, and, again, Miyazaki lets us observe and appreciate more under the leisurely atmosphere of the film. I have no idea on why and how this extraordinary train exists, but it intrigues and then enchants me nonetheless with small but interesting touches here and there (The operator of the train, whose face is deliberately never shown, somehow took me to a similar dude in classic Japanese TV animation series “Galaxy Train 999”, for example).

And then there comes a surprising moment of poignancy to linger on you along with the lovely score by Miyazaki’s longtime collaborator Joe Hisaishi. I will not go much into details, but I can tell you instead that this touching moment will be quite emotionally resonating if you are familiar with those “Earthsea Cycle” novels written by American science fiction writer Ursula K. Le Guin (Incidentally, one of them was adapted into an animation feature film by Studio Ghibli in 2006, but the result has been regarded as one of the lowest points in the history of Studio Ghibli).

In conclusion, “Spirited Away”, which deservedly garnered the first Oscar statue for Miyazaki (He subsequently received the Honorary Oscar and then won another Oscar for “The Boy and the Heron”, by the way), remains quite fresh and alive as brimming with style and imagination, and it can also be regarded as another pivotal point in Miyazaki’s legendary career. In contrast to the sheer scale and ambition of “Princess Mononoke” (1997), the film just shows him simply enjoying himself a lot in his own creative area without feeling much need to prove himself anymore, and this trend has been continued during last two decades with varying degrees of success. I must confess that I am not that enthusiastic about “Howl’s Moving Castle” (2004), “Ponyo” (2008), “The Wind Rises” (2013), and “The Boy and the Heron” compared to many of you, but we all can agree on that they are all as distinctive as you can expect from a Miyazaki animation film nonetheless, and maybe I will regard them with more admiration and appreciation someday just I do to “Spirited Away”.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment