Roald Dahl’s Matilda the Musical (2022) ☆☆☆(3/4): An enjoyable standard movie adaptation

Posted on December 27, 2022 by kaist455

“Roald Dahl’s Matilda the Musical”, which was released on Netflix on Christmas, is as cheerful and naughty as you can expect from the film adaptation of a popular stage musical based on one of the well-known works from Roald Dahl. While it is sweet, cheery, colorful on the whole, the movie also has some dark and vicious sides to amuse or scare its young target audiences, and everything is mostly packaged well together along with a number of nice musical scenes.

Because I have not seen the stage musical itself, the adaptive screenplay by Dennis Kelly, who wrote the musical version along with director Matthew Warchus and songwriter Tim Minchin, is fairly faithful to Dahl’s original children’s book. Our plucky little young heroine Matilda Wormwood (Alisha Weir) has often been neglected by her callously self-absorbed parents since she was born, but she has managed to grow up pretty well alone by herself, and she does not have much problem with her parents as long as they let her spend her own time with books without bothering her at all.

However, Matilda’s daily life happens to be disrupted when her parents, who did not care about her education at all from the beginning, comes to send her to a local private school run by its stern and imposing headmaster Miss Agatha Trunchbull (Emma Thompson). Right from its first appearance, the school looks gloomy and harsh enough to be described as Dickensian, but Matilda is not daunted at all, and her considerable intelligence and spirit soon comes to draw the attention of everyone in the school including her classroom teacher Miss Jennifer Honey (Lashana Lynch), a kind and tender young woman who is frequently daunted by Miss Trunchbull just like many others in the school.

Of course, Miss Trunchbull does not want anyone to disrupt her firm status quo in the school. No matter how much Matilda and her schoolmates try to be cheerful and defiant with their songs and dances, Miss Trunchbull is determined to crush all their spirits by any means necessary, and there is one grotesque moment when she casually wields a certain athletic skill of hers in front of her terrified students.

Meanwhile, our young heroine is also harassed more by her parents, and she usually finds herself escaping into a little story she makes up and then shares with Mrs. Phelps (Sindhu Vee), a local mobile librarian lady who are always ready to borrow her many different kinds of books. Matilda’s story is a sort of fairy tale about one young circus couple and their little daughter who has to endure a lot due to her evil step-aunt, and it goes without saying that this story is eventually connected with the main narrative of the film.

As she pours more emotion into her story, Matilda somehow acquires a telekinetic power, and this special power of hers is increased as she uses it more and more during next several days. While she is told early in the film that she should not be bad to others even if they are not so nice to her at all, she cannot help but mischievous and furious, and it is not much of a spoiler to tell you that, after learning of something personal between Miss Honey and Miss Trunchbull, she will eventually use her special power against her hateful schoolmaster.

This story setting surely can be as dark as, say, “Carrie” (1976), but the movie steadily maintains its cheery mood as usual. As a matter of fact, even Miss Trunchbull comes to have her own fantasy musical moment in the middle of the story, and we surely have a little laugh from that before we wince again for her sheer nastiness which may influence a lot Imelda Staunton’s equally mean character in “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix” (2007).

Technically, the movie is more or less than a standard musical adaptation, but it delivers its musical sequences fairly well on the whole, and young performer Alisha Weir duly holds the center as required. Along with a bunch of child performers on the screen, she brings a considerable amount of natural charm and spirit into their big musical scenes in the film, and I would have not mind at all if they had suddenly performed instead that striking school musical scene from “Pink Floyd – the Wall” (1982).

Around Weir, several other adult cast members have some fun with playing their colorful caricature roles. Sindhu Vee and Lashana Lynch are effective as two kind adult characters in the Matilda’s life, and Lynch demonstrates here a considerable range of her talent while feeling quite different from her tough supporting turns in “No Time to Die” (2021) and “The Woman King” (2022). As Matilda’s utterly obnoxious parents, Stephen Graham and Andrea Riseborough willingly throw themselves into their crude supporting parts, and the same thing can be said about Emma Thompson. Even though she is actually not taller or bulkier than me, she somehow looks quite heavy and imposing in the film, and she surely enjoys every nasty but undeniably juicy moment handed to her.

In conclusion, “Roald Dahl’s Matilda the Musical” is an enjoyable musical movie mainly thanks to the engaging performances from its main cast members, and I was entertained by its delicious mix of sweetness and nastiness. Although it does not surpass the 1996 movie adaptation of Dahl’s book, the movie has enough charm and spirit to keep things rolling to the end at least, and it may cheer you up a bit in the middle of the ongoing holiday season.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery (2022) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): Blanc back in action

Posted on December 24, 2022 by kaist455

Rian Johnson’s new film “Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery”, which was released on Netflix yesterday, is another delicious murder mystery to be savored and appreciated. Like its predecessor “Knives Out” (2019), it is constantly witty, intriguing, and suspenseful as throwing one surprise plot turn after another, and you will enjoy many fun and colorful moments in the movie even if you can easily guess the answer in advance.

Daniel Craig, who recently ended his tenure in the James Bond series, is back as Benoit Blanc, who is incidentally the best detective in the world according to Google. He happens to be invited to a little private party to be held in a small Greek island belonging to the owner of a prominent technology company, and he subsequently finds himself surrounded by a bunch of figures who are also invited to the party for a personal reason. All of these figures have been associated with Miles Bron (Edward Norton) in one way or another for years, and Bron is going to have another fun time with them just like he and they have done every year.

Not long after Blanc arrives in Bron’s island along with the other guests, Bron reveals something to Blanc in private. As a matter of fact, Blanc was not actually invited, and it goes without saying that somebody wants Blanc to attend Bron’s party for some unknown reason. Because Bron plans a murder mystery game for his guests who do not like him much for each own reason, Blanc tactfully warns Bron, but Bron does not pay much attention to Blanc’s warning.

It is not much of a spoiler to tell you that the situation becomes much more serious for everyone later, but now I have to be a lot more discreet about describing the story and characters. Once everyone sees how serious the circumstance really is, Blanc steps forward as expected, but the mystery handed to him looks quite difficult to solve. For instance, every living figure around him has a good motive and chance for committing that crime in question, and the mood certainly becomes more tense and disturbing as he and others are going to be stuck inside the island during next several hours.

As the story briskly rolls from one unexpected moment to another, the movie deftly doles out a number of hints and clues as expected, and the main pleasure comes from how Johnson’s screenplay cleverly builds them up to an eventual narrative point where everything perfectly and beautifully fits together in the end. While there are several big plot turns to catch off you guard, the movie never loses its narrative momentum at all as firmly holding our attention, and we are completely satisfied by how it delivers a cathartic moment of resolution with sheer thrill and excitement.

In technical aspects, Johnson and his crew members have a lot of fun with imbuing the main background of the movie with a considerable amount of style and details. Bron’s big manor in the island, which is more or less of the reflection of his ego which is as big and vain as Elon Musk’s, is filled with interesting stuffs to draw our attention, and my personal favourite one in the film is a garden which happens to be a non-smoking area for a reason to be revealed later in the film. The production design by Rick Heinrichs and the costume design by Jenny Eagan are often impressive to say the least, and their splendid works are captured well on the screen by cinematographer Steve Yedlin.

At the center of the film, Craig goes all the way with his character’s exaggerated accent while also exuding his character’s irrepressible wit, charm, and intelligence. Blanc looks rather silly at times, but, like Hercules Poirot in Agatha Christie’s mystery novels, he is always watchful as enthusiastically drawn to another crime mystery to be solved, and Craig ably conveys to us a strong sense of decency and justice behind his character’s unabashedly comic appearance. At one point early in the film, Blanc emphasizes that he just cares about facts only, but, of course, he does care much more than he seems on the surface, and you will smile as observing how he slyly lets the justice served around the end of the story.

Around Craig, Johnson assembles a number of various performers, and each of them surely has each own fun with their broad but colorful archetype roles. While Edward Norton is suitably obnoxious as required by his character, Kathryn Hahn, Leslie Odom Jr., Kate Hudson, Dave Bautista, Jessica Henwick, Madelyn Cline, and Janelle Monáe are also effective as the other potential suspects in the story, and Monáe is especially terrific when her character, who is quite bitter about Bron and most of his guests for an understandable reason of her own, mercilessly roasts them all at one point. In addition, a number of notable figures and performers make their cameo appearances here and there throughout the film, and it is certainly a bit poignant to see the last movie appearance of Angela Lansbury and Stephen Sondheim (The movie is dedicated to both of them, by the way).

On the whole, “Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery” is thoroughly enjoyable thanks to Johnson’s dexterous handling of story and characters and many other strong elements including the spirited efforts from Craig and the other main cast members. It is a shame that I and other South Korean audiences could not have a chance to watch at movie theater, but I had a pretty good time with it today anyway, and I sincerely urge you to check it out as soon as possible before exposed to any spoiler.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

The Big 4 (2022) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4): Very silly – and very violent

Posted on December 24, 2022 by kaist455

Indonesian Netflix film “The Big 4”, which was released in last week, is a very violet action flick which is also quite silly and melodramatic at times. Although this extreme mix is mostly too uneven and shallow for me, the movie seldom bores its target audiences as diligently doing one thing after another during its 141-minute running time, and you may come to have some expectation on its possible sequel, if you enjoy it more than me.

Right from the opening sequence unfolded inside a seemingly benevolent charity organization which turns out to be quite atrocious, the movie strikes us hard with its deliberately jarring concoction of extreme violence and silly gags. Once they are ready to attack their latest target, Topan (Abimana Aryasatya) and his three team members go all the way for rescuing those poor children to be dissected for illegal organ trafficking sooner or later, and we are surely served with lots of bloody and gory moments as they swiftly and mercilessly eliminate every opponent in their sight.

These four persons have been under the guidance of Petrus (Budi Ros), an old man who has been a father/mentor figure since they were very young. When his daughter Dina (Putri Marino) becomes a police officer at last, Petrus decides to retire just because he does not want to have more problem between him and his daughter, and his four pupils respect his decision even though they are not so happy about his decision.

However, Petrus is suddenly killed while being ready to move onto the next chapter of his remaining life, and that certainly devastates both Topan and Dina. Dina becomes quite determined to find out who killed her father, but the case remains unsolved during next three years, and that makes her quite frustrated to say the least – until she accidentally comes across a little thing which leads her to something her father hid from her for years.

Dina subsequently goes to a little island which is a well-known spot for tourists, and that is how she comes to encounter Topan, who has been living a relatively quiet life in the island just like his fellow team members since their mentor’s death. Right from their first encounter in a shabby little hotel, Dina instantly senses something is not quite right, and, what do you know, Topan soon finds himself wielding his good old killing skills when it turns out that there are some dangerous people following after Dina.

These dangerous people are led by a ruthless figure named Antonio Sandoval (Marthino Lio). When he is introduced to us early in the film, he and his gang members are eliminating their latest opponents, and he enjoys every minute of it while also showing off his jacket which is not so different from the one worn by Ryan Gosling in “Drive” (2011).

As gradually revealed along the story, Antonio is driven by a certain personal motive besides being hired by someone eager to eliminate Topan and his team members, and Topan and his team members have no choice but to go back to their good old killing mode in addition to working along with Dina. Although she does not trust Topan and his team members much at first, Dina eventually helps them because there is not anyone to help her besides them, and, not so surprisingly, she also finds herself attracted to Topan as she gets to know him more.

While these main characters bounce from one narrative point to another, the movie keeps things rolling as pouring lots of action and comedy onto the screen. You may chuckle while watching a number of broad comic moments including the one involved with a sudden catfight between Dina and the only female member of Topan’s team, and then you will be quite thrilled or shocked by several relentless action sequences. As far as I observed from the film, it kills as much as its fellow Indonesian action movie “The Raid: Redemption” (2012), and I assure you that the movie is equally violent except that it also does lots of silly gags even during its most violent moments.

That brings a sort of personality to the film, but I often felt distant to it even while admiring the considerable efforts put into its main action sequences. I appreciate how the main cast members willingly throw themselves into both action and comedy, but their acting often feels cartoonish to me as frequently swinging back and forth between heavy-handed melodrama and cheap comedy, and their characters do not have much substance behind their colorful appearances. In the end, I did not care much when the movie arrived at its expected big finale filled with lots of bangs and crashes.

In conclusion, “The Big 4” is not entirely without good things to enjoy, but I still hesitate to recommend it due to many reasons including its overlong narrative and superficial characterization (Several main female figures in the film are mostly defined by how attractive they look, for example). Maybe because I did not enjoy much “The Raid: Redemption” and its following 2014 sequel unlike many others, I was not entertained a lot by what is so loudly and violently presented in the film, but I have to say that director/co-writer/co-producer Timo Tjahjanto is a good action movie director who does know how to present action on the screen well for us. Seriously, I can only hope that he will do a better job in terms of story and characters in his next film.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Gagarine (2020) ☆☆☆(3/4): His little fight against the demolition to come

Posted on December 23, 2022 by kaist455

French film “Gagarine” is a little but interesting drama which alternates between reality and fantasy as observing its plain young hero’s defiant stand against the change to come. Although its overall result is uneven at times, the movie compensates for its several shortcomings via a vivid and realistic sense of life and location, and that is the main reason why a number of big fantasy moments during its last act work with enough interest and poignancy.

The main background of the film is Cité Gagarine, a real-life housing project in Ivry-sur-Seine, on the south of Paris. After they interviewed the residents of Cité Gagarine as requested by the architects working on its planned demolition, directors/co-writers Fanny Liatard and Jérémy Trouilh made the 2015 short film of the same name there, and they subsequently returned for making its feature film version before the demolition of Cité Gagarine was eventually started in 2019.

The story is unfolded mainly through the viewpoint of Youri (Alséni Bathily), a 16-year-old boy living in one of the apartments of Cité Gagarine. Because his mother has been absent for some personal reason for a while, Youri usually has to take care of himself alone, and he also spends lots of time on fixing many things in his apartment building. Because of it has lots of problems and damages here and there, Cité Gagarine, which was incidentally named for the Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin, has been considered for planned demolition, and, needless to say, that is the last thing Youri wants.

Mainly because both his first name comes from that famous Soviet figure, Youri is interested a lot in the space, and we often observe how passionate he is about space exploration. At one point, he gladly prepares a little nice setting for helping his neighbors get a good look at the solar eclipse on the sky, and everyone including him cannot help but amazed as beholding that rare cosmic happening later.

However, their harsh reality comes not long after that. Despite Youri’s diligent efforts in the housing project, those public inspectors conclude that Cité Gagarine should be demolished sooner or later instead of getting some extensive repair. Youri and several other residents naturally protest against that, but there is nothing they can do, and we soon see many of residents leaving the housing project one by one.

Youri is supposed to be picked up by his mother as she finally seems to find a place where she and her son can stay, but then she notifies him on some change in her plan. Youri eventually finds himself staying alone in the housing project without anyone else living around him, and that makes him more determined to stay there regardless of whatever will happen next. When those demolition workers come later, he decides to hide inside a little private place he made for himself, and it looks like he will be all right as long as he evades those demolition workers.

Around that narrative point, the movie has some little fun with how its hero attempts to make a self-sustaining space for himself. As a smart kid who apparently has considerable potential in engineering, Youri develops a number of various devices and equipments via many different stuffs left in the housing project, and his little private place eventually becomes more like the interior of a small spaceship. In fact, he even makes a control panel although he is not making a spaceship at all.

Meanwhile, Youri comes to befriend a teenage girl named Diana (Lyna Khoudri) more, who left the housing project along with her family but then comes across him when both he and she try to steal some stuffs at a nearby construction site at one night. He later takes her to his place, and she is certainly impressed by how he has managed to live there thanks to a bunch of devices developed by him. In addition, they also get themselves associated with a young local marijuana dealer, and the mood becomes merrier than before as these three young people gladly spend more time together in Youri’s private place.

Of course, their good time does not last that long as the demolition of Cité Gagarine is continued as usual, and Youri consequently becomes more desperate than before. During this part, the movie comes to lean more on fantasy, and that feels a bit jarring and baffling at first, but it still holds our attention thanks to Liatard and Trouilh’s good direction. Their cinematographer Victor Seguin provides a series of striking visual moments to be appreciated, and these wonderful moments are further enhanced by the ambient score by Amine Bouhafa and Evgueni and Sacha Galperine.

Liatard and Trouilh also draw engaging performances from their main cast members. Alséni Bathily is solid as the strong human center of the story, and he is also supported well by several other main cast members including Lyna Khoudri, Jamil McCraven, Finnegan Oldfield, Farida Rahouadj, and Denis Lavant, who steals the show as usual in his brief appearance.

On the whole, “Gagarine” is a modest but charming piece of work to admire, and Liatard and Trouilh make an admirable feature debut here after directing several short films together. Although it is a bit too thin in terms of story and characters, the movie has enough mood and details to engage me at least, and I will gladly pay attention to what Liatard and Trouilh will do next in the future.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Corsage (2022) ☆☆☆(3/4): Royal Ennui

Posted on December 23, 2022 by kaist455

“Corsage”, which was recently selected as the Austrian submission for Best International Feature Film, is a dry but interesting character study loosely based on one real-life royal figure during the late 19th century Europe. According to the IMDB trivia, the movie is quite different from the history of its real-life heroine in many aspects, but it is anchored well by another strong acting from its very talented lead performer, and I admired that and the other strong elements of the film even while observing its story and characters from the distance.

Vicky Krieps, a wonderful Luxembourgish-German actress who has been more prominent thanks to her unforgettable breakthrough turn in Paul Thomas Anderson’s “Phantom Thread” (2017), plays Empress Elisabeth of Austria, who has incidentally been the subject of numerous other films for many years (In fact, the movie is one of five Austrian-German productions about Empress Elisabeth of Austria to be released between 2021-2022). The movie begins with Elisabeth preparing for another public occasional which she is going to attend along with her husband, and it is clear that she is not so particularly interested in that from the start. As a matter of fact, she feigns to be sick when she and her husband later meet several officials in public, and she enjoys the responses from others around her simply because she just wants to have a little fun.

Phlegmatically observing Elisabeth’s daily life in the royal palace in Vienna, the movie conveys to us more of her ongoing ennui. She and her husband do not have much affection between them, and he is usually occupied with handling numerous matters of his country day by day. While she is eager to discuss those matters with him in private, he does not listen or talk to her much, and he does not even provide much comfort or affection to her, though he respects and values her as his empress to some degree.

Naturally, Elisabeth lets herself getting involved with some other men out there, and one of them is King Ludwig II of Bavaria (Manuel Rubey), who is incidentally also a cousin of hers. Although they are more like friends instead of lovers, Elisabeth loves to spend some time with him anyway, and she willingly ignores her husband for that, even when her husband is ringing the bell right in front of the entrance to her private place.

However, King Ludwig II soon returns to his place, and Elisabeth gets bored again while her husband does not provide much help or support as usual. When she later tries to have some fun with her little daughter outside, that only leads to an unexpected trouble, and that causes more conflict between her and her husband, who still does not understand how much she wants more fun and freedom outside their palace.

In the end, Elisabeth’s husband allows her to have a little vacation in some rural area of England, where she has some other guy with whom she is willing to spend some time. Although this guy is just a plain horse trainer, Elisabeth enjoys flirting a bit with him, and he also seems to be interested in getting a little closer to her, though causing a scandal is the last thing he wants.

Not so surprisingly, their relationship is soon aborted as the people surrounding Elisabeth remind her again of her weighty social position, and Elisabeth is frustrated to find herself stuck in her royal palace again. She tries to get closer to her husband, but her little bold attempt only results in a joyless sex between them, and she is not so pleased at all when she comes to learn that her husband has been close to a girl much younger than her. As approaching to 40 day by day, she becomes more anxious about losing her beauty and youth, and that makes her all the more conscious of how her body is slim enough for her tight corsage.

Leisurely strolling from one episodic moment to another, the movie deliberately adds bits of anachronism for emphasizing its modern perspective just like Sofia Coppola’s “Marie Antoinette” (2006), and director/writer Marie Kreutzer has some fun with that. For example, you may sometimes notice certain objects which do not fit well with the period background of the film, and you will also be caught off guard by certain key scenes where English songs are sung and performed for no apparent reason.

In the meantime, Krieps’ nuanced performance, which deservedly won the Best Actress at the European Film Awards (She was also jointly awarded with Adam Bessa in “Harka” (2022) when the movie was shown in the Un Certain Regard section of the Cannes Film Festival early in this year), keeps holing our attention to the end. Effortlessly embodying her character’s longtime frustration and suffocation, Krieps is terrific especially when her character becomes more neurotic later in the story, and she is also supported well by several good supporting performers in the film including Katharina Lorenz, Jeanne Werner, Alma Hasun, Manuel Rubey, and Florian Teichtmeister.

Overall, “Corsage” will surely require some patience from you due to its detached attitude and slow narrative pacing, but it is still worthwhile to watch thanks to Kreutzer’s competent direction as well as another stellar acting from Krieps. I must tell you that Its ending may distract you if you know enough about its real-life heroine, but, in my trivial opinion, it mostly works in the context of the story, and you may come to reflect more on the feminist aspects of the film. After all, there are still millions of women constrained by social roles imposed upon them, and that certainly makes the film timeless to say the least.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Lady Chatterley’s Lover (2022) ☆☆☆(3/4): She simply wants him…

Posted on December 23, 2022 by kaist455

Netflix film “Lady Chatterley’s Lover”, which was released early in this month, is more sensitive and thoughtful than you might expect. Based on that famous classic novel of the same name by D. H. Lawrence, the movie surely provides enough sensuality and eroticism as expected, but it also focuses a lot on the mood and emotions around its two main characters, and the overall result is often interesting as really delving into those tricky matters of heart between them.

At the beginning, the story begins with its young heroine’s supposedly happy marriage with her wealthy husband in the middle of the World War I. Although her husband, Sir Clifford Chatterley (Matthew Duckett), will soon go to the front line as a military officer, Constance (Emma Corrin) is still excited because her husband feels like someone she can love for the rest of her life, and it looks like nothing can possibly go wrong for them despite the ongoing war.

Unfortunately, the situation is subsequently changed a lot when Lord Chatterley returns with a serious physical injury. Besides not being able to walk any more, he is now sexually impotent, and that certainly frustrates Constance a lot right from when they have their first night in his big family manor. As he starts to concentrate on writing a novel, she assists his writing process while constantly taking care of him, but, despite her sincere affection toward him, there comes a point where she cannot stand their isolated status anymore.

Eventually, her older sister comes to the rescue, and Constance finally can take some rest outside the manor while her husband is being taken care of by Mrs. Bolton (Joely Richardson), an old widow who once worked in the manor. She eventually befriends the newly hired gamekeeper of the manor, and it does not take much time for her to find herself quite attracted to this handsome lad. Although he is rather quiet and taciturn on the surface, Oliver Mellors (Jack O’Connell) turns out to be an intelligent and sensitive guy, and Constance becomes more fascinated with him as they often meet each other in a little cabin in the forest outside the manor.

As a matter of fact, there is really nothing which can restrain Constance’s growing interest and passion toward Oliver, because her husband already allowed that she can have a secret sexual affair behind her back just for having a son who will inherit his title as well as his wealth. Although she was rather hesitant about her husband’s suggestion, Constance eventually comes to follow whatever her heart feels at one point later in the story, and Oliver cannot say no because, well, the feelings between them turn out to be quite mutual.

As they heedlessly throw themselves into their carnal passion along the story, the movie surely presents a considerable amount of sex and nudity on the screen, but director Laure de Clermont-Tonnerre, who previously made a feature film debut in “The Mustang” (2019), and her crew members including cinematographer Benoît Delhomme handle these sexual moments with enough sensitivity and lyricism. As surrounded by the vivid sights of nature, the two lovers are excited by not only their passion but also their freedom, and there is a lovely rainy scene where they get themselves completely naked and then freely roam outside together as feeling more love between them.

Of course, the circumstance becomes more complicated when Constance and Oliver become more aware of how tricky their respective positions are. Although his wife left him several years ago, Oliver still cannot get a divorce due to her selfish reason. As loving Olivier more and more, Constance actually begins to consider leave her husband, but she knows too well that she may lose everything in her life as a result. Her husband becomes more distant and less understanding as he comes to pay more attention to the local coal mining business instead of his writing, and he prefers to maintain the status quo between them without asking too much about the baby she may have sooner or later. Even her older sister reminds her of that cold and harsh reality, when she later comes to learn more about her ongoing affair with Oliver.

As the story is heading toward the expected finale, the screenplay by David Magee stays focused on the emotional details of its main characters, and Emma Corrin and Jack O’Connell ably embody and express these fine character details to be appreciated. while Corrin, who recently drew our attention for her Emmy-nominated turn in the fourth season of Netflix drama series “The Crown”, wonderfully illustrates her character’s growing longing and passion along the story, O’Connell, who has steadily advanced since his breakout performance in “Starred up” (2013), deftly complements his co-star with his equally good performance, and their good chemistry on the screen is one of the main reasons why the movie works on the emotional level instead of merely scratching its carnal surface. Around Corrin and Jack O’Connell, several substantial supporting performers including Matthew Duckett, Joely Richardson, Ella Hunt, and Faye Marsay are also solid on the hole, and Richardson’s supporting performance feels particularly resonant, considering she once played Lady Chatterley herself in the 1993 BBC TV serial.

Overall, “Lady Chatterley’s Lover” is fairly engaging in terms of mood, storytelling, and performance, and it makes me more interested in reading the works of Lawrence (Full Disclosure: I still have not touched any of them even though I bought the Penguin paperback editions of three novels of his several years ago). In short, this is one of more entertaining offerings from Netflix during this year, and I sincerely recommend you to check it out during your spare time.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Bardo, False Chronicle of a Handful of Truths (2022) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4): A mid-life self-indulgent by Alejandro G. Iñárritu

Posted on December 21, 2022 by kaist455

Alejandro G. Iñárritu’s latest film “Bardo, False Chronicle of a Handful of Truths”, which was released on Netflix after being shown in South Korean theaters in last month, is a self-indulgent misfire which jumps high for greatness but only ends up with occasional glimpses of greatness instead. When I watched it early in this morning, I often felt baffled and frustrated even as admiring those splendid visual moments, and I was eventually left with hollow impressions on whatever Iñárritu attempts to achieve here.

After the simple but mesmerizing opening scene unfolded on a vast barren field, the movie instantly thrusts us into a bizarre hospital scene involved with its hero’s pregnant wife. Her baby has just been born, but the baby does not want to be in the world outside according to her doctor, and we soon see the baby really put back into her womb. We later come to gather that this is more or less the magic realism presentation of what actually happened to her and her baby, but it is just weird to me without much emotional effect, and that is all.

Our hero, Sliverio Gama (Daniel Giménez Cacho) is an ex-journalist who has been an acclaimed documentary filmmaker since he quit his reporting job many years ago, and we get to know a bit about his current status. He has recently released an ambitious docufiction titled “False Chronicle of a Handful of Truths”, and he is soon going to be honored by some prestigious association in LA for his journalistic achievement in the past.

It goes without saying that he is at the top of his life and career, but Silverio cannot help but become agitated and conflicted at times. When he is back in Mexico City along with his family, he is reminded of how much he has been separated from his home and country, and it is implied that he is not wholly popular in Mexico because of the main subjects of his documentary works. For example, one of his documentaries is incidentally about the illegal immigrants crossing over the Mexico-US border, and we later get an extended sequence showing how he followed and recorded their plights and struggles.

At one point, Silverio goes to a big TV studio for being interviewed by a journalist who was one of his close colleagues during that time. As cinematographer Darius Khondji’s camera smoothly follows after our hero, we are served with a series of shiny moments including the one featuring a group of dancers wearing fluffy costumes, and then there comes a blistering moment as Silverio is subsequently roasted by his old colleague in front of many audiences watching them.

Silverio simply remains non-responsive throughout his “interview”, but he talks with his wife a lot when he returns to his residence in Mexico City, and you may be baffled a bit as listening to their conversation for good reasons. Was he really “interviewed” as shown on the screen? Was it just a pigment of his artistic imagination, just like what he and a certain American character behold at a big palace?

Without clarifying anything, the movie continues to flow from one episodic moment to another, and Iñárritu and his crew members deserve to be commended for the sheer cinematic prowess shown from these moments at times. In case of the sequence unfolded during a big party for celebrating another public honor received by Silverio, the camera confidently and effortlessly moves among lots of dancing people, and that eventually culminates to a little sublime moment as our hero slowly dances among others in the center.

It is quite evident that Iñárritu tries to emulate what was attempted in Federico Fellini’s “8 1/2” (1963) and many other similar films ranging from Bob Fosse’s “All That Jazz” (1979) to Charlie Kaufman’s “Synecdoche, New York” (2008), but, alas, he does not have succeed much here as failing to have enough control over various story materials. Each of them may look good and interesting individually, but they do not gel much together on the whole, and that makes us feel more lost and confused, no matter how much the movie tries. In the end, we only come to see lots of self-pity and self-indulgence from the distance without much care or attention, and the movie eventually fizzles despite a little plot turn during its finale.

Above all, its hero, who is clearly a fictional reflection of Iñárritu, is not particularly interesting enough to hold our attention. Daniel Giménez Cacho surely tries as much as he can do with the materials given to him, but his character is not that memorable compared to the filmmaker hero of “8 1/2” or the playwright hero of “Synecdoche, New York”. In case of a bunch of performers surrounding Cacho, they simply come and go without much impact, and I must confess that I remember more those three poor amphibian pets of Silverio’s son.

In conclusion, “Bardo, False Chronicle of a Handful of Truths” is not a total dud thanks to its admirable technical aspects, but it is a big letdown in contrast to Iñárritu’s two previous films “Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance)” (2014) and “The Revenant” (2015). Considering how a considerable number of critics and reviewer are enthusiastic about it, I may give it another chance someday, but, for now, I will just move onto whatever I will watch next.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Louis Armstrong’s Black & Blues (2022) ☆☆☆(3/4): Inside Louis Armstrong

Posted on December 20, 2022 by kaist455

Documentary film “Louis Armstrong’s Black & Blues”, which is currently available on Apple TV+, does more than merely presenting the life and career of Louis Armstrong, who has been regarded as one of the greatest American musicians in the 20th century. While it feels pretty conventional at first, the documentary eventually delves deeper into its surprisingly complex human subject as freely flowing from one point to another in his life and career, and the result is often engaging and enlightening to say the least.

Via a bunch of various archival materials including Armstrong’s private recordings, the documentary gives us a vivid presentation of his life and career. He was born to a poor black family residing in New Orleans, Louisiana in 1901, but he grew up fairly well under his parents along with his siblings, and then he came to show considerable musical talent around the time when he was sent to a house for black juvenile delinquents due to one minor incident. Not long after that, young Armstrong came to play trumpet in local jazz bands, and then his career came to have a big breakthrough when he later moved to Chicago, Illinois thanks to a mentor figure of his.

Eventually, Armstrong came to go his own way thanks to his growing prominence. He became famous not only in Chicago but also in New York City, and he soon found himself performing in London and Paris as he continued to draw more attention. While there was a little trouble with his lousy manager, Armstrong was fortunate enough to have a new manager right after firing that manager, and his new manager turned out to be more helpful and reliable than the previous one. He knew how to pull strings here and there for further promoting Armstrong, and that quickly made Armstrong one of the most famous entertainers in US during that time.

Armstrong steadily maintained his star status during next several decades, but he never forgot how he and many other black people often coped with racism and prejudice. While he mostly stuck to that familiar jovial persona of his in public, he was not your average Uncle Tom at all, and there is an amusing episode about when he gave hell to one white employee on a movie set in Hollywood because of how blatantly he was disregarded by that white employee.   

And that was actually mild compared to what Armstrong and many other fellow black musicians often had to endure. Especially when they were in the South, they usually had no choice but to conform to its local segregation rules, and Armstrong surely had many episodes of racism and prejudice to tell. When he was supposed to be introduced on the stage during one concert, the white master of ceremony refused to introduce him just because of his race, and Armstrong eventually had to step forward for introducing himself because there was no other option. 

When the Civil Rights Movement was ignited in US around the 1950s, Armstrong was frequently asked about his opinions on the Civil Rights Movement. While he often did not provide much comment, he did not restrain himself at all whenever it looked necessary in his view. As a matter of fact, he did not hesitate at all to criticize President Dwight D. Eisenhower for not giving enough response to a certain big issue of racism and segregation in Arkansas, and he was actually much more supportive of the Civil Rights Movement than he seemed on the surface.

Nevertheless, Armstrong was not regarded that highly among more progressive black people during that time due to his seemingly conforming public image. In an archival interview, late Ossie Davis frankly talks about why he and many others around him did not like much Armstrong as well as what he represented – and how he came to change his mind after accidentally having a private glimpse into Armstrong’s life and humanity on one day.

The documentary also pays some attention to the loving relationship between Armstrong and his fourth wife Lucille. She understood well how stubborn her husband usually was, but she was also equally stubborn to say the least, and that was how she managed to make her husband move into a permanent residence despite his initial reluctance. He did not like that much at first, but, what do you know, he came to love the house a lot more than expected, and he even came to have a little private room of his own where many of his private recordings were stored.

When he was about to be 70 in 1971, Armstrong seemed to be able to go on more, but he eventually passed away not long before his 70th birthday. Although more than 50 years have passed, his music has constantly influenced many musicians who came after him, and his distinctive vocal and instrument performance are still recognizable to many of us. As many of the interviewee in the documentary point out, he is indeed a great musician who brought considerable change to American music, and that should be appreciated more in my inconsequential opinion. 

In conclusion, “Louis Armstrong’s Black & Blues”, which is directed by Sacha Jenkins, did a splendid job of illuminating some less-known human aspects of Armstrong’s life and career, and it is certainly one of more interesting documentary films of this year. As far as I can see from the documentary, Armstrong was a good man besides being a first-class musician, and that will probably make you admire his lasting artistic legacy more.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Good Night Oppy (2022) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): Two rovers on Mars

Posted on December 19, 2022 by kaist455

Documentary film “Good Night Oppy”, which is currently available on Amazon Prime, is gives us a close and intimate look into one remarkable space mission which came to last a lot longer than expected. When NASA sent two rovers to Mars in 2003, the expectation on them was not that high for understandable reasons, but, what do you know, these two rovers moved and lived much more than their human controllers ever imagined, and the documentary is often poignant as showing us how much human efforts and emotions were projected into these two very special rovers during a long period of time.

They were respectively named Spirit and Opportunity, and the early part of the documentary focuses on the early stages of their mission during the early 2000s. Once his proposal on the geological exploration of Mars was accepted, Steve Squyres quickly worked on the project along with a bunch of scientists and engineers, and some of his team members, who are both smart and colorful in each own way, gladly tell us a lot about their demanding but rewarding work experiences. Although anything could go wrong at any point during the upcoming mission, they carefully and thoroughly prepared step by step, and it is interesting to observe how meticulously they worked on some of numerous technical obstacles in their project.

Anyway, the rovers were eventually completed and then fully prepared before the deadline, but Squyers and his team members remained nervous as usual. While the two rockets respectively containing Spirit and Opportunity were successfully launched into the space, they still had to be watchful of any unexpected troubles, and there indeed came a very big trouble when Spirit and Opportunity were in the middle of their long journey toward Mars.

Fortunately, Spirit and Opportunity respectively landed on the opposite sides of Mars without much technical glitch, but now Squyers and his scientists and engineers had to prepare for the last step for beginning the mission on Mars. Both Spirit and Opportunity needed to be connected with the NASA control room on the Earth, and Squyers and his team certainly braced themselves during the next few minutes when the fate of their mission would be determined.

To their delight, both Spirit and Opportunity turned out to be fully functional in addition to being ready to move and explore, and they became more excited day by day as Spirit and Opportunity sent lots of scientific data as they hoped. Thanks to these two rovers, they could get a much closer look into those alien landscapes of Mars, and that certainly awed and excited them a lot. Furthermore, Spirit and Opportunity provided more detailed geological data, and it seemed possible that they might come across the concrete evidence on the past existence of water on Mar.

Spirit and Opportunity were actually expected to operate just for around 90 days due to the harsh environment of Mars, but they surprised their human controllers as turning out to be more enduring than expected. For example, their solar panels were expected to be useless sooner or later as being covered with dust day by day, but the solar panels could often be cleaned by occasional dust storms, and that made both Spirit and Opportunity operate longer than their human controllers predicted.

When these rovers passed Day 90, Squyers and his scientists and engineers were quite delighted, and they became all the more motivated as Spirit and Opportunity miraculously kept working on Mars during next several years. While the scientists looked for more areas to be explored and studied, the engineers often handled small and big technical glitches to be solved in one way of another, and they all found themselves more emotionally attached to their rovers day by day.

Sadly, there eventually came a point where Spirit, which had to endure a harsher condition compared to its fellow rover, stopped to function in 2009, but Opportunity continued to function during next several years. Although it surely came to suffer more of mechanical deterioration and software problem during its later years, its human controllers kept it moving as usual, and it kept amazing them as remaining fairly well and competent.

The most touching part of the documentary comes from a number of Squyers’ team members who confide to us a lot on how much they came to care about Opportunity. The older team members cannot help but become sentimental because they put a considerable part of their lifetime onto Opportunity and its fellow rover. The younger team members regard these two rovers with respect and reverence because, well, these two rovers inspired many of them to pursue space exploration when they were kids.

In the end, there came an inevitable moment when Opportunity could not go on anymore. Due to the massive planetary dust storm on Mars in 2018, Opportunity ceased to function on June 12th, 2018, and that day was certainly quite bittersweet for its human controllers. Although it was just a machine, it was an endearing entity to them for many years, and everyone felt quite sad as arriving at the eventual end of their miraculous mission.

On the whole, “Good Night Oppy” is pretty engaging as a sincere chronicle of the two memorable rovers at its center, and director/co-writer/co-producer Ryan White, who previously made “Ask Dr. Ruth” (2019), did a splendid job of mixing archival and interview clips along with the vivid visual recreation of Opportunity, Spirit, and their extraordinary time on Mars. To be frank with you, I do not really know when we can actually go to Mars, but I really hope that both Opportunity and Spirit will be retrieved and then preserved someday for representing the better sides of our humanity, and I think you may hope for the same thing after watching this lovely documentary.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

La Vie en Rose (2007) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): Non, je ne Regrette rien

Posted on December 19, 2022 by kaist455

As your average inconsequential movie reviewer, I have seen heaps of musician biography films come and go for more than 20 years, and not many of them can top what is so powerfully achieved in Olivier Dahan’s “La Vie en Rose”, which is thankfully re-released in South Korean theaters in this month. Besides being constantly fueled by the absolutely stunning lead performance at its center, the movie also works a rather messy but ultimately dazzling presentation of the complex human personality of its legendary real-life musician, and its many highlights touch me a lot even though more than 10 years have passed since I watched it right before doing a 4-week military training in late 2007.

That real-life musician in question is Édith Piaf (1915-1963), who is still remembered for her indelible performances of various songs such as, yes, “La Vie en Rose”. Considering how Piaf’s life and career were quite dramatic as being full of many ups and downs, it is certainly difficult to compress her tumultuous life and career into one feature film, but the screenplay by Dahan and his co-writer Isabelle Sobelman manages to overcome that as freely hopping among numerous key moments in Piaf’s life via its non-linear narrative. The overall result often feels jarring and confusing at first, but it gradually generates a sort of emotional narrative as the movie focuses more on Piaf’s later years, because this is more or less than the reflection of how old Piaf struggles to regard her life and career before her eventual death.

The early part of the film mainly revolves around Piaf’s unhappy and miserable childhood years. Born to alcoholic parents who did not care much about her, young Piaf, played by Manon Chevallier and then Pauline Burlet, was separated from her street singer mother when her acrobatic father returned from the war and took her to a brothel run by his mother, and then she had to leave that place again when her father later came back several years later. While assisting her father on one day, she comes to demonstrate a bit of her natural singing talent, and that is the humble but significant beginning of her musician career.

Several years later, Piaf, now played by Marion Cotillard, is still on the streets of Paris while earning her meager living day by day via her singing, but then she comes across a local nigh club owner who instantly recognizes her considerable potential. Thanks to him, she gets a chance to show more of her talent at his nightclub, and that catapults her to a quick stardom, and, alas, her usual poor judgment of men around her leads to a devastating throwback to her burgeoning career.

Nevertheless, Piaf eventually makes a triumphant return mainly thanks to the tough tutelage from her new accompanist, and the movie quickly moves forward to her prime period when she had one big success after another in not only France but also US. As she goes for joie de vivre as usual, she finds herself passionately fallen in love with a famous French boxer, and she does not even care much about the fact that he is already married and will probably never leave his wife and children.

These and other good moments in Piaf’s life are freely juggled along with many bad moments in her life, and the striking dramatic contrast resulted from that lets us get to know more about those compelling human contradictions inside Piaf. While she is often quite vulnerable, she is also a tempestuous diva driven by her strong will to perform, and one of the most poignant moments in the film, which still moves me to tears, comes from where she is still determined to perform for her audiences as usual despite her increasingly fragile physical condition. Everyone around her understandably try to dissuade her, but she remains adamant because, as a professional dedicated to her artistic craft, she believes she must not stop no matter what happens.

However, there eventually came a point where Piaf could not possibly go on anymore around 1960. Like Judy Garland, Piaf often depended a lot on alcohol and drugs for many years, and that caused her severe health deterioration during her last several years. Although she was only 48 years old at the time of her death, she looked quite more aged than she actually was, and the later part of the film depicting her painful last years are bitter and devastating before followed by her last hurrah accompanied with “Non je ne regrette rien”, which could have been the title of her memoir if she had written it.

All these and other things in the film are held strongly together by Cotillard’s unforgettable acting, which deservedly won the Best Actress Oscar (The movie also won another well-deserved Oscar for its makeup and hairstyling in addition to being nominated for Best Costume, by the way). Fully embodying many different sides of her character, her electrifying performance deftly swings along her character’s high and low points throughout the film without any misstep, and she also looks quite credible during a number of small and big performance scenes where she gets Piaf’s mannerism absolutely right with her top-notch lip-synching job.

The main weak point of the film lies in a number of various supporting characters who come and go around Piaf. I wonder whether they could be developed more, but that would probably be distracting instead because the movie is intended to be all about Piaf from the beginning. At least, a number of notable French performers including Emmanuelle Seigner, Sylvie Testud, and Gérard Depardieu fill their small spots as much as they can with each own presence, and Jean-Pierre Martins clicks well with Cotillard during several tender scenes between them.

On the whole, “La Vie en Rose” is still a superlative film to be experienced, and its sublime qualities remind me again of how forgettable many recent musician biography flicks are. Here is a movie which wants to do a lot more than merely recreating the life story of its real-life human subject, and I am glad to report that it still shines magnificently even after 15 years.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment