The Fabelmans (2022) ☆☆☆1/2 (3.5/4): So he goes for filmmaking…

Steven Spielberg’s latest film “The Fabelmans” is a gentle and intimate drama which is incidentally inspired by the early years of his life. While you may wonder how much the movie is overlapped with Spielberg’s childhood and adolescent years, the story itself will engage and touch you as a poignant tale of life, growth, family, and the art and power of filmmaking, and you may come to have some human understanding on what made Spielberg tick toward filmmaking.

The opening part of the film, which is set in 1952, begins with how a little young boy named Samuel Fabelman (Mateo Zoryon Francis-DeFord) became interested in filmmaking. When his Jewish parents Mitzi (Michelle Williams) and Burt (Paul Dano) take him to a local theater for watching Cecil B. DeMille’s “The Greatest Show on Earth” (1952) together, Samuel is not so eager about that, what do you know, he soon finds himself enthralled and impressed along with many audiences in the screening room – especially during the climactic part of the film.

When his father bought him a toy train set for a Jewish holiday present as he wanted, Samuel is certainly ready to use it for reproducing his favorite moment in “The Greatest Show on Earth”. His rather reckless attempt annoys his parents a bit, but Mitzi recognizes her son’s artistic spirit as a woman who once aspired to be a professional pianist, and she later buys him a film camera which leads him to his first step of filmmaking.

Meanwhile, Samuel’s family comes to have a big change. Because of his job opportunity involved with his professional field, Burt decides to leave their neighborhood in New Jersey to Phoenix, Arizona, and Mitzi is not so pleased about that. At least, Bennie (Seth Rogen, who is a masterstroke of casting if you remember when he once played along with Michelle Williams in Sarah Polley’s “Take This Waltz” (2012)), a jolly dude who has been Burt’s co-worker and best friend besides being an unofficial uncle to Mitzi and Burt’s children, also moves to Phoenix for working with him as before, and both she and her kids welcome that.

The story subsequently moves onto Samuel’s adolescent period in Arizona, where he, now played by Gabriel LaBelle, keeps pursuing his interested passion for filmmaking. Along with his fellow Boy Scout members, he often makes short films to be shown to not only his parents but also to his friends and neighbors, and he feels more confident as watching how much his audiences are enthralled by his little cinematic achievements. He enjoys having them under his artistic control, and that is another source of encouragement besides his mother’s constant support.

However, Samuel’s growing skill as a filmmaker also makes him more aware of whatever is going on between his parents. In a restrained but impactful scene which any admirer of Brian De Palma’s movies will appreciate, Samuel comes to notice a certain thing while looking over what he casually shot during a family camping trip, and he consequently feels angry and conflicted about that. As his great uncle Boris (Judd Hirsch, who is wonderful in his brief but memorable appearance) warned him before, art usually does hurt, and that makes him put aside his interest in filmmaking around the time when Burt decides to move to California for another good job opportunity.

During its third act, the movie becomes a bit more intense as its young hero struggles inside and outside his family. While he becomes more aware of the growing estrangement between his parents, Samuel is often bullied by other students in his high school just because of being Jewish, and then there accidentally comes a chance for little romance, which also reignites his passion toward filmmaking.

We all know how the story will eventually end, but the screenplay by Spielberg and his co-writer Tony Kushner keeps engaging us while doling one genuine complex human moment after another as usual. When he is hired to shoot a short film of students enjoying one summer day on the beach, Samuel is not so willing to do that at first, but his artistic instinct soon comes back, and he is reminded again of the artistic power of filmmaking when he later shows the result to his young audiences. When his parents announce their separation at last, Samuel and his siblings surely feel hurt, and that is followed by a little bitter personal moment between him and one of his younger sisters (Julia Butters, who briefly but effortlessly stole the show from Leonardo DiCaprio in Quentin Tarantino’s “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” (2019), has another solid moment to be added to her promising acting career).

As the center of the movie, Gabriel LaBelle and Mateo Zoryon Francis-DeFord are seamlessly connected in their acting, and they are supported well by two contrasting key performances in the film. As Samuel’s spirited but troubled mother, Michelle Williams gives another excellent performance to watch, and she is particularly terrific when her character becomes more honest with Samuel later in the story. On the opposite, Paul Dano subtle and tender in his low-key appearance, and he also has his own moments including the one where his character comes to accept Samuel’s artistic aspiration more than before.

On the whole, “The Fabelmans” is another stunning work from Spielberg, and I really love its many small but indelible moments including the sublime ending where one certain legendary filmmaker is played by another great filmmaker (I will let you see this little ingenious casting for yourself, by the way). Yes, we have been lucky to enjoy Spielberg movies during last five decades, and, again, he does not disappoint us at all.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Avatar: The Way of Water (2022) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): Cameron back in Pandora

James Cameron’s new film “Avatar: The Way of Water” is another big stuff of entertainment you can expect from him. Although it may not be as envelope-pushing as many of his previous films such as its predecessor, it is certainly nice to be back in its alien world full of wonderful visual goodies to be cherished via big screen, and you may willingly overlook its several notable shortcomings in terms of story and characters.

The opening part shows and tells us how things have been happy and peaceful for Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) and his new family in an alien planet called Pandora for more than 10 years since the ending of “Avatar” (2009). After completely living behind his human life and body, he came to lead an indigenous alien tribe he saved from those greedy (and evil) human beings, and he and his wife Neytiri (Zoe Saldaña) subsequently came to have three kids besides adapting a little girl who is the offspring of the alien body of Sigourney Weaver’s scientist character in the 2009 movie (Please don’t ask me how the hell she got pregnant, because the movie never clarifies that matter).

However, their good time is suddenly disrupted by another invasion of the human race, and Sully has no choice but to fight against them for his family and tribe, but those humans will not go away that easily this time. Despite several considerable limits including the atmosphere of the planet which is not so suitable for human body, they are quite determined to turn Pandora into a new planet for the residents of the Earth, and they even bring several deceased villain characters of the 2009 film back into life for handling their ongoing problems with Sully and his tribe.

Sully and his tribe try as much as possible for stopping those human beings, but there comes an eventual point where Sully comes to see that he and his family must leave their forest area for protecting the tribe, and that is where the movie changes its main scenery. Sully and his family go to the sea outside their forest area, and he attempts to get the help and protection from a local tribe led by Tonowari (Cliff Curtis) and his wife Ronal (Kate Winslet), who reluctantly accept Sully’s request despite being aware of the potential risk from that.

Around that narrative point, the movie becomes more relaxed than before as Sully and his family gradually adapt themselves to their new environment, and Cameron and his production designer Dylan Cole, Ben Procter, and Vanessa Cole have a field day as filling the screen with numerous fantastic details to be appreciated and admired. The new background of the film is basically the outlandish extension of the tropical sea areas of the Earth, but it is presented with a considerable amount of interest and imagination, and I constantly observed the overall result with growing fascination even though my eyesight was often limited by my rather small 3D glasses during my viewing.

I watched the 4K HDR version in high frame rate in a local Dolby Cinema screening room, and I must tell you that I still have some mixed feelings about high frame rate. Sure, everything looks clear and fine despite the dimness of the 3D glasses, but my eyes still often had problems with adjusting to its high frame rate during my viewing, and I am considering watching the movie again at an IMAX theater just for comparison, just for checking out whether my initial impression was wrong or not.

Nevertheless, despite being distracted by this rather annoying visual quality at times, I kept being entertained and involved thanks to Cameron’s commanding handling of technical aspects including the top-notch special effects of the film which will surely be Oscar-nominated in the next year. Although its running time is more than 3 hours, the movie seldom feels like lagging, and we come to sense Cameron’s affection and enthusiasm toward his fantasy world. Sure, it is not exactly original, but he is really interested in presenting more awe and wonder for us, and that certainly makes the film have more life and personality than many other bland Hollywood blockbuster products out there.

Cameron certainly does not disappoint us in case of the expected climatic part where lots of actions happen across the screen, but that is where my attention was decreased to some degree, and I became more aware of the weak aspects of the story and characters. Many of its main characters are more or less than plot elements, and Cameron and his several co-writers often struggle to develop them further. In case of a subplot involved with Sully’s two older kids, you can instantly see where it will head, and the same thing can be said about the one involved with a certain magical ability of the daughter of Weaver’s character.

Although I have some reservation due to its weak aspects, “Avatar: The Way of Water” has lots of enjoyable things to justify its 192 minute-running time, and Cameron demonstrates here that he is still a master filmmaker who has diligently impressed and dazzled us during last four decades. I do not think the movie will be regarded as a technical milestone just like its predecessor, but it is a fairly commendable sequel, and I will not complain if Cameron continues to entertain us in the next three sequels to come. To be frank with you, I am seriously wondering whether he will take us to desert in next time just for another big scenery change, and I will not be surprised if he attempts to top what Denis Villeneuve did in “Dune” (2021).

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

10 movies of 2022 – and more: Part 3

Now here are 12 South Korean films of this year.

Continue reading →
Posted in Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment

10 movies of 2022 – and more: Part 2

And here are the other 5 movies in my list – with other films good enough to be mentioned.

Continue reading →
Posted in Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment

10 movies of 2022 – and more: Part 1

Here are the first 5 movies in my list.

Continue reading →
Posted in Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment

10 movies of 2022 – and more: Introduction

So here we are again. 2022 is being over, and I am now writing about how many movies I watched during this year despite the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Although things have been a bit better compared to what we suffered during 2020 and 2021, I am still wearing a mask just like many others, and I am seriously wondering whether we will continue to wear mask as before throughout the next year.

Anyway, 2022 has been another fruitful year for me and many other movie audiences out there. While I watched lots of notable films via those streaming services, I still enjoyed watching good films on big screen nonetheless, and I was certainly delighted to watch “Top Gun: Maverick” in a big local Dolby Cinema screening room with a bunch of audiences during one summer evening. Tomorrow, I will watch “Avatar: the Way of Water” in the same screening room, and I sincerely hope that it will be as entertaining as implied by the first preview reactions in US.

During last few weeks, I struggled to make my annual movie list, and I surely had some headache before eventually submitting my list to Indiewire and rogerebert.com. There are many movies I like a lot, but, boy, it is really difficult to arrange them in the list, and I must confess that my mind was frequently occupied with that even when I was supposed to work to earn my living at a certain small biotechnology company.

By the way, you will notice that several notable films of this year such as “The Fabelmans”, “Women Talking”, “The Banshees of Inisherin”, “Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery“, “Babylon”, “Living”, “Tringle of Sadness”, “All The Beauty And The Bloodshed” and, yes, “Avatar: the Way of Water” are not included in my list. I could not watch them and other certain films before eventually making the list, but I will surely watch them within next few months, and I will certainly mention them around the end of the next year if they are as good as others have said.

Posted in Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment

Moonage Daydream (2022) ☆☆☆1/2 (3.5/4): A Bowie Odyssey

Brett Morgan’s latest documentary “Moonage Daydream” is a kaleidoscopic presentation of the artistic career of David Bowie, one of the most interesting pop musicians in the late 20th century. Regardless of how much you know about David Bowie (Full Disclosure: I don’t know much except several notable movies where he appeared), the seamlessly dazzling montages of various archival clips in the documentary will convey you his own distinctive artistic style and personality, and it eventually comes to us a vibrant and respectful tribute to his impressive career and lasting achievement.

The opening part of the film mainly revolves around Bowie’s early career years in the early 1970s, which is mainly represented by his flamboyantly androgynous appearance in public. With his fluid sexual image, he drew lots of both female and male fans as one of the major stars during the glam rock period, and the documentary deftly shuffles the archival footage clips of his concert performances for conveying us his huge popularity during that time.

Even when he was not playing his music, Bowie constantly fascinated others with not only his usual flamboyant appearance but also his own distinctive personality. Even when he was not wearing those fancy costumes and makeups, he had a certain indelible unworldly aura around him, and that was certainly the main reason why Nicholas Roeg had him play the alien hero of “The Man Who Fell to Earth” (1976). Although he might not be a great actor, Bowie certainly left considerable impressions via his unconventional presence on the screen, and that still makes the film worthwhile to watch.

Around that time, Bowie came to feel more need for artistic exploration and reinvention, and that was how he came to decide to take a break and then go to West Berlin in 1976. While West Berlin felt quite alien to him in many ways, he felt more comfortable about trying to do many different things, and the documentary shows us him trying not only some musical experiments in a local recording studio but also some abstract paintings. As watching him doing a bit of painting experiments, I could not help but think of when he played Andy Warhol in Julian Schnabel’s “Basquiat” (1996), and I observed a series of his paintings with considerable interest and fascination. He really tried to explore and expand his artistic range and talent, and he indeed lived for that as enjoying whatever would come from that.

In the middle of the documentary, we get to know a bit about Bowie’s childhood years, which were not exactly good for him for understandable reasons. Even when he was young, he was not comfortable with the mundane conservative middle-class environment surrounding him, and he surely appreciated how his older half-brother opened the door to new worlds for him. His older half-brother introduced to young Bowie lots of progressive things ranging from Jack Kerouac to John Coltrane, and we can see that was a very important experience for young Bowie.

Unfortunately, not long after he left the Royal Air Force, Bowie’s older half-brother came to suffer schizophrenia and then stayed in a mental hospital for the rest of his life. Considering how art and mental illness are not so far from each other, Bowie seemed to have his own personal demons as he indirectly admitted, but he could ventilate lots of feelings and thoughts via his artistic activities, and I guess that explains a lot about his usual bold attitude and presence in public. He might have been afraid a lot, but he confidently wielded his striking persona as a part of his art and life, and that still existed even when he reinvented his public image as being back in action around the 1980s.

During the 1980s, Bowie became relatively less flamboyant in his slicker attire, but he still captivated his audiences as usual as shown from another series of archival footage clips. Thanks to his experiment period in West Berlin, he was more confident about going his way, and he eventually evolved as an enduring pop music icon who is still recognized and remembered by many people even after his death in 2016.

Although there is not any narrator or interviewee to explain to us about Bowie’s life and career, Morgan, who previously gave us “Kurt Cobain: Montage of Heck” (2015) and “Jane” (2017), skillfully generates a solid narrative flow via juggling many different archival footage clips including the ones from Bowie himself. We are simply served with a number of montage sequences assembled from these various archival materials, but the overall result itself is quite compelling in terms of mood and style, and Bowie’s presence constantly hovers over them mainly through his recorded words. To be frank with you, I could not understand that well his metaphysical thoughts as a straightforward man of concrete science, but I can tell you at least that he was a really intelligent dude who also had a very sensitive artistic soul.

In conclusion, “Moonage Daydream” may not enlighten you that much on Bowie’s life and career, but it is a very engaging visual odyssey into Bowie’s life and career. I do not think I understand everything in the documentary, but I enjoyed and admired a lot how it is about, and it may look more fascinating if I revisit it after learning more about Bowie’s life and career. This is surely one of more interesting documentaries of this year, and I sincerely recommend you to give it a chance before this year is over.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Marcel the Shell with Shoes On (2021) ☆☆☆(3/4): Meet Marcel the Shell

“Marcel the Shell with Shoes On” is a little whimsical work packed with irresistible charm and cuteness. Although it took some time for me to accept its rather outrageous story premise, I eventually accepted that anyway as having enough amusement and entertainment, and I also came to adore its titular hero who becomes more endearing for his unadorned innocence and curiosity.

The film takes a mockumentary approach to its story and characters, so we mostly observe its story and characters via the camera of a documentary filmmaker named Dean (Dean Fleisher-Camp). Not long after he got separated from his wife, Dean came to stay in one suburban house via the Airbnb service, and that was how he came to discover a one-inch-tall talking shell named Marcel (voiced by Jenny Slate). With the willing cooperation from Marcel and his grandmother Nana Connie (voiced by Isabella Rossellini), Dean and his camera have followed the daily routine of Marcel and Nana Connie, and we accordingly get a series of small humorous moments including the one showing how Marcel can move from the upstairs to the downstairs despite his physical limits.

Although he has only one eye and two legs besides his tiny mouth, Marcel is pretty active and resourceful in many of his daily activities. While his grandmother is usually occupied with growing vegetables outside, he does a number of different activities including getting some fruits from a tree outside the house, and you will be surely amused by how he can get the fruits via his own simple but clever method.

Marcel and his grandmother once had a big family some years ago, but, as shown from a flashback scene, they got separated from other family members because of some bad incident between the former resident of the house and her ex-boyfriend. As he becomes more aware of the world outside his house via his interactions with Dean, Marcel really wants to know where the hell his missing family members are at present, and Dean is willing to help him via posting his several video clips of Marcel on YouTube.

The responses to Dean’s video clips are not so impressive during the first several days, but, what do you know, they later come to draw lots attention on the Internet, and Marcel soon finds himself becoming a very popular online celebrity. Everyone is quite interested in getting to know more about him, and he is even approached by Lesley Stahl, who is quite interested in interviewing him for “60 minutes”.

Meanwhile, Marcel and Dean continue to try to get any information about where Marcel’s missing family members are now, but there is still not much clue on that, and then they get an unexpected trouble. Because of Marcel’s considerable popularity in public, many people come to their house just because of curiosity, and, not so surprisingly, a very unpleasant incident soon happens to Marcel and Dean’s dismay.

The mood accordingly becomes a little more serious than usual, but the movie still maintains its lightweight deadpan tone even at that point. When Stahl herself and her TV crew finally arrive, Marcel becomes quite nervous and conflicted for understandable personal reasons, but he is eventually motivated more by his grandmother, and we get some good laugh as observing how Stahl and her TV crew are really serious about interviewing Marcel.

I must point out that the screenplay by director Dean Fleisher-Camp and his co-writers/co-producers Jenny Slate, and Nick Paley, which is developed from the story they wrote along with Elisabeth Holm, is basically a one-joke comedy, but the movie fills its rather thin story and characters with lots of charm and personality. Although our titular hero looks quite simple on the surface, he comes to express more than his modest cuteness, and his interactions with his grandmother are accompanied with enough gravitas and poignancy to engage us. As the heart and soul of the story, Jenny Slate, who is incidentally Fleisher-Camp’s ex-wife, and Isabella Rossellini generate an effortless synergy between their lovely voice performances, which are the main reason why we can accept their characters’ fantastic existence without much problem.

Besides humbly holding the ground for the two little main characters of his film as required, Fleisher-Camp also did a skillful job of mixing animation and live-action on the screen. As he and other performers in the screen play their respective characters as straight as possible, the animation part of the screen is seamlessly incorporated into the screen, and you will be surprised how much the movie actually depends on animation. As a matter of fact, animation figures in more than 75% of the film, and that makes the movie eligible for Best Animated Feature Oscar in next year (It has already received the Best Animated Feature awards from the New York Film Critics Award and the National Board of Review, by the way).

Overall, “Marcel the Shell with Shoes On” is a cute and likable piece of work which has enough style and personality to support its rather thin narrative, and Fleisher-Camp, who previously made several short films including three ones featuring Marcell, did an admirable feature debut here on the whole. Although I am not so enthusiastic compared to many other critics and reviewers, I recognize and appreciate its undeniable charm and colorfulness nonetheless, and I think it will grow more on me before I revisit it someday.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Fire of Love (2022) ☆☆☆1/2 (3.5/4): The story of one exceptional volcanologist couple

It is difficult not to be impressed by what is so beautifully and terrifyingly presented in documentary film “Fire of Love”, which is currently available on Disney+ in South Korea. For presenting the story of one exceptional volcanologist couple, its director and editors assembled and then edited lots of archival footage clips left by this couple, and their overall result is often extraordinary for many awesome moments of sheer wonder and danger.

That volcanologist couple in question are Katia and Maurice Krafft, who were always together for their endless interest and fascination toward volcanoes for many years before they ultimately died in the Mount Unzen eruption in Japan in 1991. When they accidentally met each other for the first time in the middle of the 1960s, they instantly clicked with each other thanks to their common academic subject, and that was the beginning of their long story of study, adventure, and love.

As shown from a series of archival footage clips showing how they worked and interacted with each other, Katia and Maurice were a wonderful couple who complemented each other in more than one aspect. Right from when they began their relationship, they decided not to have any kid for fully focusing on their scientific research which would surely demand a lot of time and effort from them, and their contrasting approach methods fit quite well with each other. While Maurice usually approached to his study subjects in wider views, Katia focused on smaller things to observe and record, and that made them perfect research partners for each other.

For their research, Katia and Maurice often went here and there around the world for any active volcano about to be erupted sooner or later, and that was where most of their remarkable film records came from. While they were in constant danger, they took some calculated risk for their academic interest and study, and you will surely be awed and terrified as observing how they were often very close to erupting volcanoes. Yes, it is indeed awesome to have a close view on those epic eruptions, but it is also quite scary to watch all those vividly volcanic moments full of hot smoke and lava, and you will be all the amazed by how Katia and Maurice were usually casual in front of their camera.

Of course, Katia and Maurice were certainly well aware of the possibility of getting themselves killed at any moment during their field research, but they were still driven by their academic passion as well as their love toward volcanoes. While it was always difficult to fund their researches, they were always happy and excited whenever they had a chance to observe an active volcano in their latest eruption, and we cannot help but amused a bit as watching a number of little playful moments between them.

Although they initially thought that it was not right to categorize volcanoes due to their various characteristics, Katia and Maurice eventually agreed that volcanoes could be divided into two categories. In case of “red volcanoes”, they are relatively less dangerous because their craters simply spew up red hot lava to be flowed down from them, and that was how Katia and Maurice could often closely capture those vivid moments of eruption from this kind of volcanoes. At one point, the documentary shows an archival footage clip showing hot lava quickly cooled by sea water, and that is certainly another marvelous moment to watch.

In case of “grey volcanoes”, they can be much more dangerous than their red cousins because their sudden explosive eruption can be quite more disastrous in addition to being very unpredictable. In case of the massive eruption of the Mount St. Helens in US in 1980, which is still the deadliest and most economically destructive volcanic event in the US history, many volcanologists including Katia and Maurice knew in advance that the volcano would soon have a big eruption, but the eventual eruption was a lot more catastrophic than expected, and the gray barren aftermath of the eruption shot by Katia and Maurice is devastating to watch to say the least.

While they loved volcanoes a lot, Katia and Maurice also cared a lot about predicting and preparing for the disasters caused by volcanic eruptions just like many other fellow volcanologists of theirs. Although there are many unpredictable factors behind volcanic eruption, there are also scientific ways to detect the possibility of next eruption to happen, and Katia and Maurice focused much on recording how catastrophic volcano eruption can be. In case of the eruption of the Nevado del Ruiz stratovolcano in Colombia in 1985, this resulted in the death of more than 23,000 people, and Katia and Maurice did not look away at all as vividly capturing its horrific aftermath with their camera.

The story eventually arrives at that fatal moment of Katia and Maurice on June 3rd, 1991. When Mount Unzen finally began its eruption, this turned out to be deadlier and more unpredictable than expected, Katia and Maurice were unfortunately too close to the volcano at that time, and it is poignant to see how they diligently worked together as usual before that fateful day came – and how they probably stood by each other till their death.

In conclusion, “Fire of Love”, which won the Jonathan Oppenheim Editing Award in the U.S. Documentary category when it was premiered at the Sundance Film Festival early in this year, handles its two fascinating human subjects with care and respect in addition to presenting a bunch of splendid moments of terrifying beauty. While director/co-writer/co-producer Sara Dosa and her editors Erin Casper and Jocelyne Chaput did a commendable job on the whole, the narration from Miranda July functions well as the reflective comment on the life and career of Katia and Maurice Krafft, and the effective score by Nicolas Godin further enhances many unforgettable parts in the story, In short, this is one of the best documentaries of this year, and I wholeheartedly recommend you to check it out as soon as possible.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Sr. (2022) ☆☆☆(3/4): A free-flowing tribute to his filmmaker father

Netflix documentary film “Sr.”, which was released in last week, is a free-flowing tribute to one notable American filmmaker who had a very interesting life and career. Because I have not seen any of his work yet (Shame on me!), I wish the documentary presented more of his work and career for enlightening me a bit, but the documentary is still fairly engaging as gradually delving into the complex human relationship between him and his more famous son along its amorphous narrative, and it is often poignant to observe what is exchanged between them.

His name is Robert Downey Sr., who is incidentally the father of, yes, Robert Downey Jr. During the 1960s, Downey Sr. rose to considerable prominence thanks to his several successful underground films such as “Chafed Elbows” (1968) and “Putney Swope” (1969), and his son still remembers how busy and interesting his childhood environment was during that time. Young Downey Jr. frequently watched Downey Sr. and others busily working on their latest project in his family residence, and he even appeared in one of his father’s films. Although he was very young at that time, he showed considerable potentials as a performer, and that was the beginning of his long movie acting career.

As Downey Sr. frankly admits at one point, he did not know much about filmmaking from the very beginning, but he decided to try anyway, and, what do you know, he turned out to be talented enough to develop his own filmmaking style and approach. Although it was always difficult to get his films financed in one way or another, he always found ways to overcome his small production budget, and he tells an amusing episode on how his blatantly frank attitude managed to convince some rich guy to sign a big fat check for the production of “Greaser’s Palace” (1972).

Although his significant achievements were later eclipsed by his son’s much bigger career success associated with those Marvel Cinematic Universe flicks, many of Downey Sr.’s works have been regarded as the important artistic works from that era since they came out. As a matter of fact, “Putney Swope” was actually included in the US National Film Registry several years ago, and he is certainly proud of that as shown from one brief moment in the documentary.

As often interviewed by his son, Downey Sr. is ready to tell all in front of the camera, and he even becomes a main part of the shooting of the documentary, which is incidentally co-produced by his son. While observing the work progress from director/co-cinematographer Chris Smith, who is mainly known for “American Movie” (1999) and recently made Netflix documentary “Fyre: The Greatest Party That Never Happened” (2019), and the crew members of the documentary, Downey Sr. decides to be an active part of the production, and the mood becomes playful when he has the camera focus on several ducks living in a pond of his neighborhood in New York City.

Around that point, the documentary comes to pay more attention on the relationship between Downey Sr. and his son, and their frank conversations are touching because they are well aware of Downey Sr.’s incurable illness. There are still some unresolved matters between them despite their mutual love and affection, and Downey Sr. is willing to discuss with his son on how he inadvertently exposed his young son to drugs during that wild filmmaking period of his – and how that led to lots of troubles in his son’s career and life during the 1990s.

Meanwhile, the medical condition of Downey Sr. gets worsen as time goes by, but he does not stop participating in the production of the documentary. Becoming less mobile than before, he knows that he does not have much time now, but he is still passionate about the production of the documentary nonetheless, and we see how he does some editing job while lying on his bed.

Eventually, there comes a point where Downey Sr. cannot go on anymore, and that certainly affects Downey Jr. a lot as shown from his little private conversation with his therapist. Just like his father, he is totally frank and sincere without any vain pretense, and he cannot help but a bit more emotional in the middle of the conversation.

As many of you know, Downey Sr. died on July 7th, 2021, and the documentary thankfully avoids any cheap sentimentality while frankly recognizing the sadness of his family members including his son. When he holds a little private memorial for his father, Downey Jr. delivers a sincere and succinct eulogy for his father in front of his several family members, and that is more than enough for us to sense the feeling of immense loss from him.

In conclusion, “Sr.”, which recently received the Best Documentary Award from the National Board of Review a few days ago, is rather uneven at times due to its free-flowing narrative, but it often amuses and touches you while showing lots of respect and affection toward Downey Sr., and its offbeat storytelling approach is surely something he may approve of. Although it is not exactly informative, it ignites some curiosity on his works in my mind at least, and I think I should check out some of his notable works as soon as possible.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment