The Amateur (2025) ☆☆(2/4): Amateurish to say the least

“The Amateur” will not surprise or entertain you much for many bad reasons. Compared to all those countless spy thriller films during last several decades, the movie does not have any ounce of style and substance to distinguish itself at all, and you will only mindlessly follow its mechanical plot execution without much care or attention, while also occasionally depressed by the glaring waste of several talented actors on the screen.

Rami Malek, who is still in the search for any possible good role to go further than his Oscar-winning performance in “Bohemian Rhapsody” (2018), plays Charles “Charlie” Heller. a young data analyst/code breaker working for CIA. At the beginning, the movie shows Heller going through his daily work at the CIA headquarters, and we notice how, as your average nerdy dude, he is usually awkward around others whenever he is not doing one task to be handled after another alone by himself.

The only person really close to Heller is his wife Sarah (Rachel Brosnahan), who never asks that much while accepting how her husband is often too busy with whatever he does outside their cozy house. When she goes to London for her another business trip, she is rather disappointed that he cannot accompany her again, but he sincerely promises that he will go to London with her in the next time, even though his mind soon becomes busy with whatever he is supposed to handle next in his workplace.

However, a few days after his wife’s departure, there comes the shocking news. She got unfortunately killed during a terror incident which suddenly occurred in the middle of London, and Heller is certainly devastated to say the least. In the end, he becomes quite determined to track down those several figures associated with his wife’s death for himself, and his direct supervisor is naturally not so pleased about Heller getting too personal about the ongoing investigation on that terror incident.

However, Heller happens to have something to blackmail his director supervisor, who turns out to have been doing a lot of unauthorized operations behind his back. He eventually agrees to let Heller go through a bit of training session under a top-notch trainer working at the CIA recruit camp, and Heller promptly begins his training session, though it looks like he is woefully unprepared as his trainer correctly sensed from the very beginning.

Of course, as many of you already guessed, it is soon revealed that Heller is actually quite ready for what he carefully planned in advance. Once everything is set and ready for him, he immediately runs away and then embarks on his quest for revenge, and he later gets some assistance from one of his key informers, who reluctantly decides to help him despite the considerable risk from that.

While this is certainly quite a typical setup, the screenplay by Ken Nolan and Garry Spinelli, which is based on the novel of the same name by Robert Littell, often fails to develop the story and characters from that. While its hero is a rather flat figure despite Malek’s diligent efforts, many other characters in the story are more or less than bland and superficial archetypes, and this weak aspect is quite evident especially when Heller finally confronts a shady figure directly responsible for his wife’s death. Just like several other villains confronted by Heller, this figure is not particularly interesting or memorable, and that is why the finale feels like a mere whimper instead of feeling dramatic in any possible way.

In case of action, the movie does provide several action sequences as expected, but none of them is impressive or engaging enough to hold our attention, and its technical qualities are surprisingly substandard in my inconsequential opinion. For instance, despite hopping around many different locations around the world, the movie is frequently drenched so much in stark and murky color scheme that it actually looks quite sterile without generating much thrill or excitement, and that makes the whole movie feel all the more tedious.

Many of the notable cast members around Malek do not have many things to do except filling their respective spots as demanded. Although she brings a bit of warmth to her several scenes, Rachel Brosnahan is limited by her thankless role, and the same thing can be said about Caitríona Balfe, who also tries her best with her under-written supporting roles. In case of Laurence Fishburne, Michael Stuhlbarg, Holt McCallany, Julianne Nicholson, and Jon Bernthal, these ever-dependable performers simply come and then go as required without leaving much impression on the whole, and this is another big disappointment in the film.

In conclusion, “The Amateur”, directed by James Hawes, is a pretty amateurish genre piece which does not bring anything new to its genre territory while also failing to entertaining us in more than one way, and I must confess that my mind sometimes went to many other better spy thriller films out there while becoming less and less interested in whatever was happening on the screen. For example, I recently watched Steve Soderbergh’s new film “Black Bag” (2025), and that film has much more wit, interest, and thrill compared to “The Amateur”. Believe me, you will have a lot better time if you watch “Black Bag” instead of this mediocre product, and you may thank me for that later.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Taxi Driver (1976) ☆☆☆☆(4/4): A disturbing urban masterpiece from Scorsese

Even after almost 50 years since it came out, Martin Scorsese’s 1976 film “Taxi Driver” still has the power to disturb and fascinate us. Here is a dark but undeniably compelling character study focusing on one very disturbed man and his festering evil, and you will be alternatively interested and alarmed as observing his descent into madness and violence along the story.

Needless to say, Travis Bickle (Robert De Niro) has been one of the most famous anti-hero figures in the movie history, but I noticed again how little the movie shows or tells about his past. At the beginning, we are told that he is an ex-marine who once served in the Vietnam War, but that is all we can know about his past. In fact, he does not seem to have anyone beyond his solitary life in the middle of New York City, though he writes a letter to his parents at one point later in the story.

Nonetheless, Travis comes to us as a vivid human figure to observe as Scorsese and his screenplay writer Paul Schrader skillfully and meticulously illustrate Travis’ aching loneliness and growing anger toward the society. As Schrader’s screenplay adds more detail to its hero’s life and personality, Scorsese and his crew members including cinematographer Michael Chapman palpably capture the urban atmosphere of New York City on the screen, and the frequent nightmarish qualities of the nocturnal scenes in the film give us more understanding on Travis’ increasingly unhinged state of mind, which is full of anxiety and anger fueled by all those seedy sights and figures on the streets and alleys of the city.

As he drives here and there around the city, Travis feels more isolated and lonelier than before, and he surely feels the need of any kind of human connection, but we observe again and again how clumsy and awkward he is in interacting with others around him – especially women. During one early scene, he tries to approach closer to a clerk working in a local pornography theater, but he only ends up alarming her. In case of Betsy (Cybill Shepherd, who is as alluring as she was in Peter Bogdanovich’s “The Last Picture Show” (1971)), a young beautiful woman working in the ongoing political campaign of a well-known senator, she seems interested when he finally approaches to her after watching her from the distance for a while, but she promptly rejects him without any hesitation when he unwisely takes her to one of his frequent pornography theaters. When he tries to approach to her again on the phone, a sense of rejection is so painful that even the camera soon moves away from him instead of watching him to the end.

What follows next is a textbook case of incel male violence. Getting angrier and moodier due to being rejected by Betsy, Travis becomes gradually obsessed with that senator she works for, and we soon see him buying several guns and then preparing for his spiteful assassination attempt step by step. However, he is still lonely and miserable as before, and that is quite evident from that iconic moment which has been imitated by many people including Robert De Niro himself (Remember “The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle” (2000), folks?). “You talking to me?”, he keeps saying to himself in the mirror, and then that is followed by the one of the most revealing lines in the film: “I’m the only one here.”.

Meanwhile, Travis gets involved with another female figure who happens to be on his way. She is an underage prostitute named Iris (Jodie Foster in one of her first major roles), and Travis immediately feels the need to save her from those horrible people exploiting her, but, just like Betsy, Iris does not feel any particular need to be saved by him. This ironic situation between them is certainly reminiscent of John Ford’s classic film “The Searcher” (1956), where John Wayne’s hero character struggles to extract his kidnapped niece from a Native American tribe but she does not want that at all.

The movie becomes all the more disturbing for us as Travis is about to go beyond the point of no return, but Scorsese’s confident direction holds our attention to the end while never losing the control over the story and characters. After what inevitably happens due to Travis’ exploding madness, the camera phlegmatically and chillingly looks over the aftermath, and that is further accentuated by the broodingly dramatic score by Bernard Herrmann, a legendary film music composer who incidentally died shortly after finishing the recording of his score.

In the end, the movie arrives at the ambiguous ending which may actually be no more than the delusion of Travis’ disturbed mind, and De Niro’s unforgettable performance, which deservedly received an Oscar nomination, adds a small but significant touch to that. Yes, Travis seems to find some inner peace at last, but you may also wonder how long it will last, and De Niro subtly conveys to us another possibility of madness via a brief but disconcerting facial expression. (While watching the rough cut of the film, Herrmann correctly observed this: “You know, he’ll do it again.”).

On the whole, “Taxi Driver”, which happens to be re-released in South Korea yesterday, is one of the best works in Scorsese’s long and illustrious career, but we all also know that it is also something to handle with considerable caution. As shown from the assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan in 1981, it has inadvertently influenced too many incel dudes like Travis out there, and even Scorsese’s subsequent work “The King of Comedy” (1983), which is sort of the comically straight-jacketed version of “Taxi Driver”, could not stop this at all (Just look at the disagreeable commercial success of Todd Philips’ “Joker” (2019), a hollow and toxic piece of work which shamelessly copies both films in many aspects). Despite all these troubles, “Taxi Driver” survives nonetheless, and I am sure it will certainly continue to intrigue and unnerve us as before.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Akira (1988) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): A chaotically striking Japanese animation film

I must confess that I scratched my head more than once when I watched Katsuhiro Otomo’s 1988 animation feature film “Akira” for the first time in 2010, which happens to be released in South Korean theaters yesterday. Yes, this is one of the most visually striking animation films I have ever seen, and my eyes were thoroughly dazzled to say the least, but my mind kept wondering what is exactly happening in the story.

Maybe that is because the film attempts a bit too much as trying to do a lot of things from Otomo’s classic manga series of the same name. Or, as my critic friend Michael Mirasol told me a few days ago, chaos and confusion are the whole point of the story, where its two lead characters keep struggling to understand what the hell is going on around them along the plot. Regardless of which explanation is correct, I chose to embrace its overwhelming visual qualities as watching it at a Dolby screening room this time, and I am glad that I watched it in this way.

The story is set in New Tokyo, 2019, a futuristic city which was built after the former one was destroyed by one sudden massive disaster which started World War III in 1988. As watching all those towering skyscrapers in this dystopian background, you will be definitely reminded of not only Fritz Lang’s “Metropolis” (1927) but also Ridley Scott’s “Blade Runner” (1982), which incidentally came out in the same year when Otomo’s manga series did.

At the beginning of the film, we are quickly introduced to the two lead characters of the story: Shōtarō Kaneda (voiced by Mitsuo Iwata) and his best friend Tetsuo Shima (voiced by Nozomu Sasaki). They are the members of one of the local biker gangs in the city, and we soon get the intensely exhilarating action sequence where they and their fellow gang members clash with their main rival group.

Mainly because he wants to show that he does not need Kaneda’s protection at all, Tetsuo is quite determined to show more of his skill and guts, but then something unexpected happens. He has an accident when suddenly coming across an odd little figure who looks like an extremely aged boy, and, what do you know, he is soon taken along with that odd figure to somewhere by a bunch of soldiers under the command of Colonel Shikishima (voiced by Tarō Ishida).

While Kaneda is subsequently trying to find where his friend is, the plot thickens with more figures entering the picture. We meet two other strange figures who also look as aged as that odd figure. We get to know more about what Colonel Shikishima and other bureaucrats have been trying to hide behind their back. We see what he and his men do to Tetsuo, who becomes a new subject for their top-secret scientific experiment involved with the titular figure in the story. And we also watch the city being thrown into more chaos and violence as its citizens are more frustrated and furious about the incompetence of their city government.

In the midst of this chaotic circumstance, Kaneda encounters a young woman named Kei (voiced by Mami Koyama), who turns out to be involved with a sort of resistance group in the city. It seems that she and her colleagues try to stop what Colonel Shikishima and his men are attempting to do, and Kaneda eventually gets himself more into their situation because 1) he needs some help from them for finding Tetsuo and 2) he somehow got smitten with Kei right from their first encounter.

Around that narrative point, your mind may feel like being a bit overtaxed by all these and many other things in the story, but the film keeps things rolling via a number of unforgettable images to overwhelm and then haunt you for a long time. As he somehow gains a superpower way beyond his knowledge and control due to that scientific experiment, Tetsuo’s mind becomes more volatile and reckless step by step, and there is a nightmarish moment when his mind gets quite disturbed by the equally considerable psychic power of those three little odd figures, who turn out to have a poignant personal story later in the film.

In the end, everything expectedly culminates to the epic showdown between Tetsuo and Kaneda, who becomes quite determined to stop Tetsuo by any means necessary as his immense but uncontrollable power causes a lot of destruction in the city (I have to warn you that the depiction of violence in the film is quite brutal, bloody, and gruesome, by the way). Although things get quite frantic with a lot of bangs and crashes across the screen, Otomo and his crew never lose their focus on style and detail as well as story and character, and you may not mind at all even when their efforts go way over the top without any restraint.

On the whole, “Akira” will sometimes baffle you due to its rather murky and complicated plot which leaves a lot of things left unresolved and unexplained, but you will be impressed by its undeniable visual power, which has steadily influenced a lot of subsequent works such as Alex Proyas’ underrated SF masterwork “Dark City” (1998). Despite some glaring dated aspects (Its two substantial female characters feel flat and perfunctory, for example), the film is still capable of intriguing and then thrilling us even at this point, and I certainly admire it more than before.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Cookie’s Fortune (1999) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): A little Southern comedy by Altman

Roger Ebert once observed on Robert Altman: “There may not have been a director who liked actors more.” Altman’s 1999 film “Cookie’s Fortune” exemplifies that, and it is often fun to watch how its main cast members willingly embody the human eccentricities of their colorful characters. Every moment in the film clearly shows that Altman really enjoyed spending time with his cast members, and the result is a little but precious gem full of charm, humor, and that distinctive Southern atmosphere.

The movie is set in a small rural town of Mississippi during one Easter week. As this town is going through another night, everything seems quiet and peaceful, except the busy rehearsal of an amateur theater production of Oscar Wilde’s “Salome” at a local church. In fact, the policemen patrolling around the town are more occupied with their fishing matters than doing their routine job.

And then we meet Willis Richard (Charles S. Dutton), a black handyman working for a wealthy widow named Jewel Mae “Cookie” Orcutt (Patricia Neal). Having lived with his employee for many years, he has been pretty much like her best friend, and we can clearly sense the mutual affection between them when he returns from a local bar. He clumsily attempts to go inside the house without waking up Cookie, but he only ends up waking her up instead. Nonetheless, they have some hearty night talk while he cleans up her dead husband’s guns as he promised before.

However, on the very next day, Cookie decides to join her dead husband just because, well, she is reminded again that she has really missed him so much. While Willis is outside for several other things besides buying some groceries, she commits suicide in her bedroom. Her dead body is soon found by her two nieces Camille (Glenn Close) and Cora (Julianne Moore), who drop by Cookie’s house just for borrowing a certain precious glass object even though they have never have been that close to their aunt. As a haughty lady neurotically fastidious about her family reputation, Camille instantly decides to do some cover-up, and Cora does not object to this at all as a dowdy woman who has always been dominated by her overbearing sister.

Thanks to Camille, Willis later becomes the prime suspect in this “murder” case, but the movie does not hurry itself at all as leisurely doling out one absurd moment after another. Yes, the situation is indeed serious for Willis and several others who really care about him. However, Willis is rather phlegmatic about his circumstance, and there is an amusing moment when he casually plays Scrabble with not only his lawyer (He is the only lawyer in the town, by the way) but also one of the deputy sheriffs inside the jail of the police station (“I’ve fished with him”, he says as guaranteeing Willis’ innocence).

And this is just the beginning of many small humorous moments to follow. Quite confident that she will inherit everything from her aunt as her closest kin, Camille quickly embarks on taking over her aunt’s house. She is not deterred at all even after getting the sheriff’s warning, and her brief moment involved with a cookie jar is simply priceless to say the least. While promptly siding with Willis, Camille’s estranged daughter Emma (Liv Tyler) also cannot help but get drawn more to her ex-boyfriend who is now working as a deputy sheriff, and their constant mutual attraction functions as sort of running gag throughout the film. In case of an unflappable investigator entering the picture later in the story, he often finds himself getting baffled a lot during his interrogations of several eccentric town residents who supposedly saw Willis around the time of the “murder”. As a matter of fact, we are all the more amused as he seems quite oblivious to how two certain black ladies flirt with him together in the middle of one of his interrogations.

Even when everything in the story is about to be resolved as expected, the movie continues to take its time as before. Before eventually heading to its finale where a few hidden personal facts are revealed to our little surprise, the movie lingers a bit on Camille’s hilariously painstaking efforts on that amateur theater production of “Salome”. Altman’s affection toward his performers is apparent here, as he patiently pays attention to the small and big details of that modest stage performance.

Like many of Altman’s works, the main cast members of the film give a solid ensemble performance as bringing enough life and spirit to their respective parts. Although being a bit too exaggerated at times, Glenn Close delightfully chews every theatrical moment of hers as demanded, and she is complemented well by the relatively subdued appearance of Julianne Moore. While Liv Tyler and Chris O’Donnell generate enough romantic chemistry between them, Ned Beaty, Donald Moffat, Lyle Lovett, Courtney B. Vance, and Patricia Neal are colorful in each own way, and the special mention goes to Charles S. Dutton, whose amiable performance effortlessly holds the center around his fellow cast members.

In one of his reviews, Ebert said that he enjoyed comedies “where eccentric people behave in obsessive and eccentric ways and other, equally eccentric, people do everything they can to offend and upset the first batch.”. “Cookie’s Fortune” is surely a prime example, and this small but likable comedy film is too good to be merely forgotten as one of Altman’s several minor works between “Short Cuts” (1993) and “Gosford Park” (2001). Although it does not reach to the greatness of these two high points in Altman’s filmmaking career, it is still quite entertaining to observe Altman simply having a little fun time along with his talented performers, and you may want to savor their cheerful Southern comfort again.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Voices (2024) ☆☆☆(3/4): Personal memories of a massacre

South Korean documentary “Voices” simply listens to the testimonies from a bunch of people traumatized in one way or another by the massacres during the Jeju uprising during 1948 ~ 1949. Focusing more on the female victims and survivors, the documentary illuminates some hidden human aspects of the Jeju uprising, and it certainly reminds me that I and many other South Koreans still need to learn and remember more of the sheer human tragedies during that dark period.

First, let me give some background information for you if you do not have much knowledge on the Jeju Uprising, When the South Korean government was about to be officially established under President Rhee Syng-man via the upcoming elections in early 1948, many people in Jeju Island began to protest against this just because they did not want their country to be divided in half, and this eventually led to a big insurgency against the local police on April 3rd. President Rhee subsequently declared the martial law upon the island, and then the uprising was brutally suppressed by the local police, the South Korean military, and some right-wing thugs during next several months.

During that terrible time, around 30,000 civilians were massacred just because of being labeled as communists or collaborators. While many of these innocent victims were male, there were also lots of female victims, and the documentary later points out that many of these unfortunate women are not clearly identified while being simply recorded as somebody’s wife or daughter even at this point.

Although many of these female victims were killed at that time, some of them managed to survive, and the documentary introduces us several living survivors one by one as looking closer into their individual tragedies. In case of one of them, she is still haunted by the trauma and guilt from surviving alone by herself, and, not so surprisingly, she is not that willing to tell more about what happened to her and several other young women at that time.

Sadly, she and many other female survivors were forced to move on while never being allowed to talk about their respective personal traumas for several decades, and we can only imagine how much they suffered and endured in silence. At least, the South Korean government finally began to recognize the atrocities during the Jeju uprising not long after the democratization in the late 1980s, and there have actually been lots of efforts for recording and then preserving the testimonies from not only them but many other survivors. At one point later in the documentary, we see a small but valuable archival institute storing hundreds of recorded testimonies, and we are told that there may still be more human tragedies to be uncovered for getting the fuller picture of the atrocities during the Jeju uprising.

Like any other violent time throughout the human history, women were usually quite more vulnerable than men during the Jeju uprising, and the documentary often emphasizes this horrible aspect as often accompanying the testimonies with the brief moments of rough but striking animation. Those soldiers and policemen and right-wing thugs frequently preyed on young women just for satiating their sexual need, and nobody dared to stop this at all. Many of those raped women were killed later merely for silencing them forever, and there is a chilling moment when the documentary phlegmatically looks over a beach cliff where many of those raped women were thrown into the sea right after their execution.

Director Jee Hye-won also focuses a bit on how many of the female survivors of the Jeju uprising managed to continue their respective lives since 1949. After the Korean War during the early 1950s, the people of Jeju Island became all more silent about the Jeju uprising, and many of the female survivors had to take care of themselves as well as their remaining family members without getting much help from others around them. One female survivor reminisces about how hard she worked for many years as a sea woman, or “haenyeo”, not only around the island but also all other parts of South Korea, and she cannot help but become sad and regretful as remembering when she had to work in the sea while leaving her little son tied on the boat just for his safety.

Because all these and many other survivors do not have much time to live due to their old age, remembering their stories becomes all the more important these days, but I am quite concerned as reflecting on how troubling the South Korean society has been due to the considerable political turmoil caused by those right-wing nuts including President Yoon Seok-yeol, who was thankfully ousted two days ago after committing so much harm to the South Korean government and society during last three years. These deplorable people have actively tried to erase the memories and records of many national atrocities including what occurred during the Jeju uprising, and I am sure that they will keep trying that in the future.

Anyway, “Voices” overlaps with another recent South Korean documentary film “Until the Stones Speak” (2022) to a considerable degree, but both of them will inform you a lot on the human dimensions of their common historical subject. In addition, they will also give you more understanding on the historical context of Nobel Prize-winning South Korean author Han Kang’s recent novel “We Do Not Part”, whose story and characters are incidentally closely associated with the Jeju uprising. In my humble opinion, the Jeju uprising indeed needs more public awareness than before, and “Voices” certainly deserves to be watched by more audiences out there.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Grand Tour (2024) ☆☆☆(3/4): A pair of tours across Eastern Asia

Portuguese filmmaker Miguel Gomes’ latest film “Grand Tour”, which was selected as Portugal’s submission to Best International Film Oscar in last year, a baffling but interesting work with some artistic touches to admire and appreciate. While you may occasionally scratch your head as wondering what it is actually about, it is often intriguing to observe its unconventional mix of past and present along with a number of various languages, and I observed this odd concoction with enough interest despite getting impatient from time to time.

At first, the movie, which is loosely based on the W. Somerset Maugham’s “The Gentleman in the Parlour: A Record of a Journey from Rangoon to Haiphong”, seems to be about Edward (Gonçalo Waddington), a young British lad working as a civil servant in Myanmar under British colonial rule, 1918. In the beginning, he is waiting for the arrival of his fiancée Molly (Crista Alfaiate) at the port in Rangoon, but then he becomes afraid of marrying her, so he impulsively decides to leave for Singapore right before her arrival.

Edward simply expects Molly to go back to London, but, alas, his trouble does not get solved that easily. Once he arrives in Singapore, he comes across a cousin of hers, and then he is notified that she will also come to Singapore soon. Becoming more desperate than ever, he quickly gets on a train going to Bangkok, Thailand, but then the train gets unexpectedly derailed in the middle of its route to Bangkok, and he soon finds himself depending on a local guide accompanied with his three wives.

Around that point, we begin to sense that the movie is more about mood and details than story and characters. At one point in the middle of the story, we see a smartphone, and that is just another example showing how the movie freely and fluidly moves from back and forth between past and present. As Edward moves from one Eastern Asian city to another, the movie usually shows the montage of many different sights observed from these cities in our time, and the narration, which is delivered in several different languages according to the locations, phlegmatically describes whatever Edward does and experiences during his increasingly complicated tour across Eastern Asia.

 This strange juxtaposition between past and present in the film surely baffles us from the very beginning, but it is also somehow amusing for the surreal qualities generated from this offbeat narrative approach. As the past and the present continue to swirl around each other, the movie becomes more reflective on the gap and connection between its two different parts, and it also provides a number of gorgeous visual moments provided by cinematographers Gui Liang, Sayombhu Mukdeeprom, and Rui Poças. Curiously, many scenes in the movie are shot in black and white film, but its “dream” parts are shot in color film in contrast, and this certainly contributes extra surrealism to the overall result.

Around the narrative point where our hero eventually ends up being somewhere in China, the movie shifts its focus to his fiancée, who is not daunted at all even after she arrives in Singapore and then finds that Edward already left for Bangkok. Molly continues to follow his trail, but then she discovers that she is much more physically fragile than she thought, when she comes to receive a bit of hospitality from some rich dude smitten with her.

Without hurrying itself at all, the movie steadily rolls toward its eventual destination, and we keep getting more of what has been gorgeously presented across the screen, though it continues to disorient us as before. During one particular scene around the end of the film, the movie deliberately shows the artificial aspect of this scene, and this will make you muse more on how the movie is about instead of what it is about.

I must confess that I am still trying to process and understand the film, but I also find it fascinating for its indelible atmosphere and detail, and I can only enumerate what lingered on my mind for a long time after the movie was over. I remember a striking scene where two very different moments overlap with each other for no apparent reason but generate an interesting dramatic effect on us. I remember a sublime moment where the relentless flow of urban traffic is accompanied with that famous classic waltz piece by Johann Strauss II. And I also remember an uncannily ethereal shot which simply looks at a foggy mountain forest for a while.

Because I have not watched many of his works including “Tabu” (2012) and “Arabian Nights” (2015) yet, I cannot say whether the movie is one of the better works in Gomes’ career, but I admire his confident handling of mood and details on the whole. Yes, I did feel frustrated or impatient at times during my viewing, but I also sensed the clear artistic vision inside the film, which continued to hold my attention to the end.

In conclusion, “Grand Tour”, which received the Best Director award when it was premiered at the Cannes Film Festival early in last year, is not definitely something you can casually watch for fun and entertainment, but I recommend it especially if you are really looking for something different and challenging. Although I still have some reservation, it is an interesting experience nonetheless, and I think you should try it someday.

Posted in Movies | Tagged | 1 Comment

The End We Start From (2023) ☆☆☆(3/4): Her motherhood after a disaster

“The End We Start From” is a simple but compelling movie which follows a young woman’s struggle for survival and motherhood after one big national disaster. Mostly limiting itself around its heroine’s viewpoint, the movie often accentuates how things become more uncertain and desperate around her, and that is why we are touched by how she somehow comes to find the will and determination to start again for herself as well as her little child.

The movie opens with how everything is suddenly turned upside down for its heroine, who is simply named “Mother” in the end credits. She is going through the late stage of her pregnancy, so her baby may come out sooner or later, but the situation outside her cozy residence somewhere in London is getting quite troubling at present. For some unspecified reason, rain has kept pouring down upon the whole country during last several days, and the situation becomes all the more serious as her neighborhood is gradually flooded more and more.

We later see the heroine eventually delivering her baby at a local hospital, and she and her boyfriend are relived at least for now, but they still have to deal with the national emergency situation just like many others in the country. It looks like many parts of the country including London are seriously flooded, and thousands of resulting refugees including the heroine and her family must find any possible shelter to stay right now.

Luckily for them, they subsequently find the shelter in the boyfriend’s hometown, and they are welcomed by the boyfriend’s parents, but, not so surprisingly, things get worse during next several days. While it seems that the heroine and her family can be safe and fine at the house of the boyfriend’s parents, they soon need to get some food supply for their survival, and the heroine finds herself left along with her baby after the others go outside for getting any food for them and her.

Needless to say, the circumstance gets worse than the heroine expected. She and her baby eventually get separated from the boyfriend, and now she has to take care of herself and her baby alone by herself. She and her baby are a bit safer along with some other refugees, and she also gets some help and support from some other woman with a baby, but she is reminded again and again of how things continue to get worse as the whole nation is still struggling to deal with the aftermath of that unprecedented disaster.

Steadily following its heroine’s plight, the screenplay by Alice Birch, which is adapted from the novel of the same novel by Megan Hunter, does not give much detail on what is going on around its heroine, but it instead focuses more on how she tries to recover from her devastated condition. While becoming more aware of her maternal responsibility, her mind cannot help but go back to those good old days of hers as reflected by occasional brief flashback scenes, whose warm and sunny mood makes a striking atmospheric contrast with her daunting current status.

Later in the story, she comes to learn about the existence of a safer shelter which is incidentally a little isolated commune. For her baby’s safety and welfare, she is certainly willing to take some risk for going to that commune, but she also comes to have the growing doubt on whether she is making the right decision or not. Can she and her baby really make a new start over there? And, above all, can she possibly leave behind everything in her life just for that?

As the movie sticks to its non-judgmental attitude, we come to focus more on the solid lead performance by Jodie Comer, who has been more prominent during last several years thanks to her appearances in several notable films including “The Last Duel” (2021). Subtly imbuing her character with enough human details to be observed along the story, Comer ably carries the film to the end without any misstep, and we eventually care more about her character when she makes a big decision on her and her baby’s future during the last act of the story.

Around Comer, a number of recognizable performers come and then go while having each own moment to remember. As the heroine’s caring boyfriend, Joel Fry has several poignant scenes between him and Comer, and we understand why the heroine is often haunted by the memories of her boyfriend. Mark Strong, Benedict Cumberbatch, who incidentally serves as one of the executive producers of the film, Katherine Waterston are also solid in their small but crucial supporting parts, and Waterson brings some warm decency to her character as her character comes to bond more along with the heroine as they go through a series of difficult circumstances together.

On the whole, “The End We Start From” requires some patience from you for being a bit too dry and slow at first, but it still works as a competent survival drama supported well by its good mood, storytelling, and performance. Director Mahalia Belo, who previously made several short films and TV episodes, makes a commendable feature film debut here, and I appreciate the technical efforts from her and her crew members including cinematographer Suzie Lavelle, who did a nice job of filling the screen with a grim sense of uncertainty and devastation throughout the film. Although it does not surprise me much, the movie engaged me enough as doing its job as well as intended, so I recommend you to take a chance with it someday.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Match (2025) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4): The competition between a mentor and his pupil

There are several factors preventing me from being really entertained by South Korean film “The Match”. While it did a fairly good job of presenting a series of intense Go matches on the screen, the movie feels rather unbalanced as often focusing more on one of the two Go players at the center of the story, and this glaring imbalance is further accentuated by how its trailer and promotion have put much emphasis only on one of its two lead performers for a big reason to be discussed later.

The two real-life figures at the center of the story are Cho Hun-hyun (Lee Byung-hun) and his pupil Lee Chang-ho (Yoo Ah-in), both of whom have been known well for many years as two of the best Go players in not only South Korean but also the international field. The early part of the movie, which is set in the 1980s, begins with how Cho became the world champion after a big match in Singapore, and then we see him being celebrated by many of his countrymen as a national hero while also being regarded as an ultimate opponent to be defeated someday.

On one day, Cho comes across Lee, who is played by young performer Kim Kang-hoon at this point. Although he is quite young to say the least, Lee already shows considerable potential as a future Go player, and Cho becomes more interested when Lee later solves a little but challenging Go problem from him. Nurturing Lee’s talent looks like another exciting challenge given to him, so Cho eventually takes Lee under his wing, and we soon see Lee becoming a member of Cho and his wife’s little domestic life.

After next several years of study and training, Lee, who is now played by Yoo Ah-in, impresses his mentor more and more, and his mentor decides that it is really the time for Lee to go out for himself for the first time. At first, Lee seems quite underachieving, but he gradually establishes his own methods and strategies for playing Go, and Cho naturally becomes prouder of his pupil as Lee rises further in his own way.

It is not much of a spoiler to tell you that Cho subsequently finds himself in a rather tricky situation as his pupil advances much faster than expected. During one national tournament, Lee swiftly defeats one opponent after another, and, what do you know, he inevitably confronts his mentor in the final match. While firmly encouraging his pupil that he should always do his best regardless of whoever will be his opponent, Cho cannot help but become more aware of the growing possibility of losing his No.1 position, and so are many others around them.

The second half of the movie are driven mainly by a series of big matches between Cho and Lee, and the screenplay by director Kim Hyung-ho and his co-writer Yoon Jong-bin deftly handles many details observed from these matches. To be frank with you, I do not know that much about how to play Go, but the movie kept me engaged nonetheless as diligently doling out enough amount of necessary information and detail for understanding whatever is being exchanged between Lee and Cho on the screen, and that is a commendable thing in my inconsequential opinion.

However, the movie is also hampered by the narrative imbalance between its two main characters. As focusing more on Cho’s inner conflict caused by his matches with Lee, the movie fails to delve more into Lee instead, and Lee consequently becomes too bland and colorless to hold our attention. Sure, he is supposed to feel conflicted a lot between his own ambition and his deep admiration toward his mentor, but he only ends up remaining a merely blank counterpart to Cho, and that is the main reason why the movie loses some of its narrative momentum during its last 30 minutes.

Is this the fault of Yoo, who has incidentally been one of the most overrated South Korean actors to me and many others? As far as I can see, his earnest efforts here in this film do not sink the whole movie, but I must point out that Yoo’s blandly low-key acting is overshadowed by the more spirited performance from Kim, who looks promising considering that he does more than holding his own small place well in front of Lee Byung-hun during the early part of the film.

In addition, there has been a big promotion problem which has riddled the movie during last several years. The movie was supposed to be released by Netflix two years ago, but it was quickly shelved after Yoo’s big public scandal involved with not only drug abuse but also some allegation on same-sex sexual assault. The movie was finally released in South Korean theaters a few days ago, but I and many other South Korean audiences could not help but notice the unmistakable absence of Yoo in its trailer and promotional posters, all of which only emphasize his co-star again and again throughout last several weeks.

Lee, who also had a fair share of public scandal around 10 years ago, handles his part fairly well, and so are several other cast members including Ko Chang-seok, Hyun Bong-sik, Jo Woo-in, Jeon Moo-song, and Jeong Suk-yong. As the sole substantial female character in the film, Moon Jeong-hee manages to overcome her rather thankless role, and she is particularly good when her character sharply reminds Cho of what is more important for him later in the story.

In conclusion, “The Match” is often problematic for a number of reasons inside and outside it despite some entertaining elements. Mainly because my mind was frequently distracted because of what I pointed out in this review, I give it 2.5 stars, but I will not stop you at all if you just simply want to enjoy the movie itself as an audience, and let’s discuss later more about that lasting question on whether we can really separate art from artist.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Arcadian (2024) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4): In their arcadian post-apocalyptic world

“Arcadian” tries to tackle its very familiar genre territory, and I like its earnest attempt to some degree. Yes, the overall result is still basically another typical post-apocalyptic horror drama film which does not break any new ground in my inconsequential opinion, but it is not entirely without engaging elements at least, and you may gladly go along with it before it eventually arrives at its predictable last act. 

During the opening scene, we are introduced to a plain dude named Paul (Nicholas Cage), and then we soon see how things quickly fall apart around him and many people out there. For some rather unspecific reason, the human civilization is almost wiped out within a short period, and a few remaining survivors like Paul must struggle day by day for their survival, while also having to protect themselves from the freakish entities originated from this apocalyptic situation of theirs.

Anyway, Paul has two baby sons under his sole care, and his sons’ safety is certainly his No.1 priority. 15 years later, his two sons, Thomas (Maxwell Jenkins) and Joseph (Jaeden Martell), grow up to become teenage boys who are now big enough to take care of themselves, but he is still concerned about their safety nonetheless. While they are now happily living together in a shabby farmhouse located in the middle of some quiet rural area which surely looks as arcadian as the very title of the movie suggests, they must always be very careful whenever night begins, because that is when those hideous entities will come out and then look for any chance to break into their residence.

However, things always look fine and well whenever another day begins with sunrise, and we get to know more about how Paul and his sons live day by day. While Thomas usually goes to a nearby farmhouse belonging to a couple and several others mainly because of seeing the adolescent daughter of that couple, Joseph prefers to stay inside their residence, but he has also been interested in how he and his family should handle their increasingly difficult problem with those hideous entities. It seems to him that these creatures have some intelligence, and he is willing to test his theory on them sooner or later, regardless of whether his father approves of that or not.

On one day, Paul lets his sons spend some time alone by themselves. However, Thomas subsequently decides to see that girl again while not telling his father at all, and then he happens to have an accident while returning from that girl’s farmhouse around the end of the day. Quite worried about Thomas’ safety to say the least, Paul immediately goes out for searching for him, and Joseph is consequently left alone by himself inside their residence as another night is beginning.

Needless to say, the mood becomes tense as Paul and his two sons are inevitably terrorized by those freakish creatures, and we get to see more of how monstrous these entities are. Whenever they are about to strike upon their prey, they show more gruesome sides to behold, and then it turns out later that they are indeed smart enough to plan how to attack their human targets more successfully, though they are still not so different from what we have seen from those countless zombie movies. 

Meanwhile, the screenplay by Michael Nilon, who also serves as one of the producers of the film, sometimes observes how harsh its post-apocalyptic world can be. While the parents of that girl are mostly nice and benevolent on the surface, they can also be rather selfish in case of maintaining their current status, and that eventually leads to a little conflict between Thomas and their daughter, who naturally feels guilty when their parents flatly refuse to help Paul at one point later in the story.

In the end, the story culminates to the climactic moment when Paul and several other main characters desperately try to defend themselves against a bunch of those hideous creature, and that is when the movie becomes less interesting than before. Merely going for its action mode without much surprise, the movie just throws a lot of CGI creatures onto the screen, and this sometimes overshadows the ongoing drama among the main characters.

At least, the movie still engages us thanks to the diligent efforts from its main cast members. Nicholas Cage, who also participated in the production of the film, wisely dials down his usual intense presence as gradually stepping aside for his younger co-stars, who are convincing as the two contrasting brothers who have maintained a strong bond between them despite their considerable personality difference. Jaeden Martell, who has been more prominent since his breakthrough turn in “St. Vincen” (2014), and Maxwell Jenkins ably complement each other throughout the film, and Jenkins also clicks well with Sadie Soverall in a few intimate scenes between them. 

On the whole, “Arcadian”, directed by Benjamin Brewer, does not distinguish itself much in terms of story and character, and I wish it had more mood, detail, and personality, even though I appreciate the competent efforts on and behind the screen. Considering that it is not a total bore at least, I will not stop you from watching it if you simply want to kill some free time of yours, but, folks, there is nothing particularly new or fresh for you here if you are a seasoned moviegoer like me, and you will soon move onto next things to watch once it is over.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Azrael (2024) ☆☆1/2(2.5/4): A wordless post-apocalyptic horror flick

When did I begin to notice Samara Weaving? Well, that was actually not a long time ago at all, considering her delightful breakout performance in “Ready or Not” (2019). Since that point, she has impressed us more and more as steadily appearing in a number of various films ranging from “Bill & Ted Face the Music” (2020) to “Chevalier” (2022), and “Azrael” surely confirms her undeniable talent to us again, though it regrettably fails to be more than the mere showcase of her acting ability.

At the beginning, the movie quickly establishes its modest post-apocalyptic background. After the human civilization was collapsed to some epic biblical incident, some survivors choose to lose their ability to speak as a sort of repentance in addition to forming a hardcore religious cult group, and the opening scene shows how Weaving’s lead character, whose unspoken name is revealed only in the end credits, is suddenly captured along with some handsome stranger by those malevolent cult members.  

While these cult members are taking our heroine to somewhere in the middle of their forest region, it becomes quite apparent to us that they are going to make her into the sacrifice for their brutal ritual. Once they tie her to one spot, they begin their little ceremony, and we soon get some glimpse of whatever she is going to be sacrificed for.

Yes, as some of you may already have guessed, the approaching entity in question is something not so far from what we have seen from those countless zombie flicks out there. It looks rather slow in its lurching movements, but it can be quite savage once it detects the smell of blood, and we surely behold its sheer barbarity not long after our heroine manages to escape at the last minute. 

As she tries to get away from not only the cult members but also those horrible entities in the forest, the movie shows more of how the cult members have stuck together under their female leader, who is played by Danish actress Vic Carmen Sonne (She was utterly unforgettable in Oscar-nominated film “The Girl with the Needle” (2024), by the way). While having incidentally been pregnant for several months at least, the leader seems to exert considerable influence over her followers, and there is a creepy moment when she and her followers silently pray together over the little but disturbing sound of a wind coming into their derelict church. 

However, the movie does not clarify much on what these insidious people exactly want from our heroine, and the screenplay by Simon Barrett does not elaborate a lot on who she is. Except for her fierce will to survive her increasingly perilous situation, we do not get to know that much about her at all, and her accidental relationship with a certain supporting character at the beginning of the story remains redundant without giving more human depth to her or that character.

 In case of those gruesome entities occasionally appearing here and there throughout the film, they surely look as scary as required, but they do not have much detail or personality either except their very, very, very hideous appearance. At one point later in the story, one of these entities makes a sort of emotional connection between itself and our heroine, but the movie remains rather ambiguous about what actually happens between them, and that is why the finale feels rather perfunctory without much dramatic impact.

Nevertheless, I still admired how Weaving continues to carry and then drive the movie to the end, Although her strong performance is occasionally limited by the contrived setting of the movie, she mostly overcomes that with her commendable efforts on bringing more presence to her character, and she also willingly throws herself into a lot of grime and blood as demanded during the last act of the film.

Around Weaving, Sonne and several other main cast members also try as much as possible. While Soone has a few big moments as expected around the climax part of the movie, Estonian actress Katariina Unt is solid as another main villain figure in the story, but both of these good actresses are unfortunately inhibited a lot by their thin supporting roles. In case of Nathan Stewart-Jarrett, he and Weaving are effortless as illustrating the mutual feelings developed between their characters during the opening part, but he also ends up being limited by his thankless role.

“Azrael” is the third feature film from director E. L. Katz, who previously made a feature film debut with “Cheap Thrills” (2013). That little black comedy thriller film is quite vicious and disturbing to say the least, but I enjoyed its naughty sense of humor while admiring how its main cast members boldly subject themselves into a number of darkly challenging comic moments.

Compared to “Cheap Thrills”, “Azrael” is relatively less impressive due to its rather superficial narrative and flat characterization, but I will not deny that I was entertained to some degree by how much Weaving tries for expanding the range of her acting talent. Besides “Borderline” (2025), she already has no less than three movies to be added to her advancing career at present, and I sincerely hope that her undeniable talent is utilized more effectively in any of these upcoming movies.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment