Mulholland Drive (2001) ☆☆☆☆(4/4): An ultimate David Lynch film

Somebody must be sad, regretful, and fading away. That is a lingering impression I get whenever I visit David Lynch’s 2001 film “Mulholland Drive”, which happens to be re-released here in South Korean theaters not long after Lynch’s death in last month. Although I still have no clear idea on who that person really is in the movie, many of its strikingly enigmatic moments are still quite compelling to watch, and these fascinating moments keep me wondering about what it is about while also mesmerized by how it is about.

On the surface, the first half of the movie seems to be your typical Hollywood adventure story. A young aspiring actress named Betty Elms (Naomi Watts) comes to Hollywood, while being full of hope and dream just like many other countless young actresses out there in Hollywood. Fortunately, she is allowed to stay in a nice and comfortable apartment belonging to her actress aunt during her aunt’s temporary absence, and she is certainly determined to do her best for the upcoming audition.

However, right from her first day in Hollywood, she encounters someone quite unexpected. It turns out that there is a mysterious young woman hiding inside the aunt’s apartment, and this young lady is quite confused and scared due to being not able to remember who she is. All she can remember is that she had a car accident on Mulholland Drive, and she eventually presents herself as “Rita” (Laura Harring), a name which she instantly got from the old poster of a certain famous Rita Hayworth film.

Sincerely feeling sorry for Rita, Betty tries to help her as much as possible, but we already know that there is something sinister happening somewhere out there in Hollywood. As shown from the opening scene, somebody wants to eliminate Rita, and both the local police and those figures associated with that incident are already looking for her. In case of the latter, they are also probably the ones pressuring a certain promising young movie director for having some “right girl” cast as the lead role of his upcoming movie.

However, of course, things go pretty weird here and there as you can expect from a David Lynch film, and the movie throws small and big moments to intrigue and then puzzle you. There is a darkly absurd moment where a guy who inadvertently causes much more mess than planned. There is a truly spooky scene where a man tries to show his friend what has been scaring him in his recurring dream. There is a charmingly cheerful old-fashioned musical moment which subtly spreads an ambiguous tone under the surface. And there is also a disturbing scene where Betty and Rita discover something very, very, very unnerving in the middle of their own Nancy Drew adventure.

After a certain narrative point later in the story, all these and many other things in the film are re-arranged and then reassembled to leave us with more interest and bafflement. As the movie continues to blur the line between reality and dream, we become more doubtful about not only Rita but also Betty, and we keep getting puzzled as not totally discerning what is actually happening around them.

In my trivial opinion, I think the movie is more or less a stream of unconsciousness swirling inside a mind riddled with a lot of guilt and sadness. Fragments of memories and experiences simply come and go without making much sense at all, and the last act of the film, which incidentally becomes quite more ambiguous than before, may reflect the painful awakening of that mind toward the emerging harsh reality, though I cannot tell you anything certain about the actual reality beneath the story and characters.

Yes, it is quite possible that everything in the film is not real at all, but what a spellbinding experience it is. While frequently resonating with its main background in one way or another (After all, Hollywood itself has been regarded as a sort of dream factory, right?), the movie playfully bounces around numerous various elements ranging from show business satire to lesbian erotica, and the overall picture is often astounding for Lynch’s artistic ambition and confidence. You may scratch your head from time to time, but you cannot take your eyes away from the movie at all because Lynch always gets things under control in his own way, and we do not complain much even when the movie eventually ends with more mystery and puzzlement.

As many of you know, the movie was initially produced as the pilot episode of a TV drama series planned by Lynch himself. We will never know what Lynch would have presented if that TV drama project of his had been green-lighted (Would it have been something like the subsequent third season of “Twin Peaks”, I wonder?), but what he developed further from that pilot episode led to another breakthrough in Lynch’s career, and he became highly regarded more than before thanks to that (The excerpt from Roger Ebert’s enthusiastic 2001 review: “David Lynch has been working toward “Mulholland Drive” all of his career, and now that he’s arrived there I forgive him for “Wild at Heart” (1990) and even “Lost Highway” (1997).”).

Above all, “Mulholland Drive” shows more of heart and soul like Lynch’s previous work “The Straight Story” (1999). Yes, Betty and Rita are certainly archetypes just like many other colorful figures in the story, but many of emotional moments between them are handled with sincerity and sensitivity, and Naomi Watts and Laura Harring, who became more notable thanks to the critical success of the movie, are simply terrific as fluidly modulating their good performances along the dream narrative of the film. Even though we are not so sure about Betty and Rita’s respective real identities, we care about their dreamy drama nonetheless, and that is the source of the lingering sadness and regret hovering over the movie.

Although it has been almost 25 years since it came out, “Mulholland Drive” remains as the pinnacle of Lynch’s long and illustrious filmmaking career. You may not like all of his works, but each of them is distinctive for his own style to be cherished, and you will agree that he was indeed one of the greatest filmmakers of our time. Good night, Mr. Lynch, it has been really a pleasure to admire and appreciate your cinematic art.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Black Box Diary (2024) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): As she steps forward as a survivor

Documentary film “Black Box Diary”, which received an Oscar nomination a few weeks ago, is a personal chronicle of one young female journalist who courageously stepped forward in public as the survivor of a high-profile case in Japan several years ago. Mostly sticking to her viewpoint, the documentary focuses on how much she struggled for standing against the sexist sides of the Japanese society and its legal system during next several years, and her painful story of defiance and struggle feels quite important even at this point.

She is Shiori Itō, and the documentary, which is directed and co-produced by Itō herself, opens with what happened to her at one late night of 2015. At that time, she was a promising young journalist working in Tokyo, but she was raped by a certain influential journalist, who was incidentally the Washington D.C. bureau chief of the Tokyo Broadcasting System. Despite being quite drunk, she naturally tried to resist this vile dude, but he eventually took her to his hotel room as shown from a video clip from the security camera of that hotel, and that is where that horrible incident occurred.

After struggling to process what happened to her at that night for a while, Itō reported her traumatizing incident to the local police, but, not so surprisingly, the local police were not so willing to do the investigation. The first investigator assigned to her case actually became more sympathetic to her as delving more into the details of her case, but he was soon replaced with some other investigator for no apparent reason, and he later told her that the chief of the Tokyo Police nullified the arrest warrant for her rapist at the last minute.

Needless to say, her rapist was quite an influential figure with a lot of political and professional strings to pull. As a matter of fact, he was a very close ally/friend of many prominent Japanese politicians including Prime Minster Shinzo Abe, and Itō was surely aware of how risky it was for her to report to the local police from the very beginning.

After the Tokyo Police virtually disregarded her case, Itō became more despaired, but she eventually found some strength for coming forward to expose her rapist in public two years later. As a result, she had to endure a lot of misogyny from the media as well as the public, but there was also a considerable amount of support for her, and she is surely consoled by that while also feeling a bit better about herself than before.

Itō and her crew members including cinematographer Yuta Okamura closely followed her long and difficult struggle during next several years, and we often see how she often felt uncertain and insecure about whatever might happen next after her public allegation against her rapist. Fortunately for her, she had some close friends willingly standing by her, and she also had several lawyers ready to help her as much as possible, but she sometimes could not help but feel vulnerable from time to time, as shown from her occasional personal video clips.

Things became all the more serious when Itō’s memoir, which is titled “Black Box”, was about to be published. By coincidence, the biography of Abe written by her rapist was going to be published around the same time, which also happened to be not long before the day of an important national parliament election. Once her book got published, she would get definitely sued for defamation by her rapist sooner or later, and that made her and others around feel more pressured than before.

Above all, it seems that their opponents were willing to silence them by any means necessary. While nearly all of the local media companies in Japan remained rather silent about her allegation against that vile dude, both the Japanese government and the Tokyo Police continued to deny everything in public, and Itō and others around her became more aware of the possibility of being monitored by their opponents. At one point, she could not help but notice a certain van parked near her residence for hours, and there is a cheerful but rather alarming scene where she and a friend of hers look for any eavesdropping device in her current residence.

Because of its narrative constantly being driven by her viewpoint, the documentary looks a little too subjective at times, but Itō comes to us as a brave woman who simply refuses to be merely labeled as a victim, and you will certainly come to root for her more as observing more of her hard journey toward justice. When her rapist sued her as expected, she and her supporters surely braced themselves for more fight and struggle, and the documentary does not miss a rather ironic side of what eventually happened in the end.

Overall, “Black Box Diary”, which is incidentally not scheduled to be released in Japan yet even at this point, is worthwhile to watch for illuminating the sexism and misogyny inside the Japanese society, and it also made me reflect a lot on how the South Korean society has also been quite problematic in similar ways for many years. Sure, thanks to the #MeToo movement around the world, the women in the South Korean society are not easily silenced these days, but our society is still stuck with misogyny and sexism just like many of other countries in the world, and I can only hope that many good documentaries of the #MeToo era like “Black Box Diary” will bring more awareness to our society.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Soundtrack to a Coup d’Etat (2024) ☆☆☆1/2(3.5/4): A Cold War plot behind jazz

Documentary film “Soundtrack to a Coup d’Etat”, which was recently nominated for Best Documentary Oscar, is a superb presentation of the hidden aspects of a political turmoil in Africa during the early 1960s. While it is simply a collage of archival records and quotes on the surface, the documentary is actually quite compelling as vividly drawing its big and complex historical picture in front of our eyes, and the result is all the more mesmerizing with our ears attuned to the soundtrack full of the jazz musicians from that time, who were connected with its main subject in one way or another.

The main subject of the documentary is the Congo Crisis around the beginning of the 1960s, when many of African countries including the Republic of Congo, which is the Democratic Republic of Congo (DR Congo) at present, became independent after many years of colonization by several European countries. As a bunch of newly independent countries in Africa and Asia soon joined the United Nations, both US and the Soviet Union began to play their Cold War diplomatic games over those countries, and, not so surprisingly, many of these countries tried to be independent from both sides as much as possible.

The US government, led by President Dwight D. Eisenhower during that time, had a big interest in the Republic of Congo mainly because of a huge amount of valuable resources in that country. The southern area of the Republic of Congo has many mineral mines including the ones which provided uranium to US during the World War II, and the US government was quite determined to have the Republic of Congo under its control by any means necessary – especially after Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev openly and vigorously expressed the opposition to the post-colonial power trying to grab many African countries again.

Along with the Belgian government, which occupied Congo for many decades before its independence, the US government attempted to overthrow Prime Minister Patrice Lumumba, who was the most important political figure of the Congolese government during that time. Right from when the independence of his country became official, Lumumba and his government tried to go their way just like many other fellow African countries including Ghana, and he and Kwame Nkrumah, who was the president of Ghana during that time and was also not approved much by US and many other western countries, were the leading figures in the movement for establishing the United States of Africa.

While plotting against Lumumba and his government behind its back, the US government also tried to win the hearts and minds of the Congolese people via a certain part of the American culture: Black American Jazz. While mostly unaware of this hidden intention, many African American jazz musicians ranging from Louis Armstrong to Dizzy Gillespie gladly went to Congo as “cultural ambassadors”, and they were all certainly welcomed by the Congolese people.

As busily shuffling its multiple narrative threads, director Johan Grimonprez, who deservedly received the Special Jury Prize when the documentary was premiered at the Sundance Film Festival early in last year, mixes numerous archival materials with many different pieces of jazz music during the 1960s. The resulting juxtaposition feels just amusing at first, but the jazzy soundtrack of the documentary, which consists of numerous familiar pieces such as Louis Armstrong’s “What a Wonderful World” and Nina Simone’s “Sinnerman”, gradually sets the tone and pace as we get to know more about the hidden sides of the Congo Crisis. In the end, we are chilled and horrified for good reasons at times while discerning more of the complicated political situation surrounding the Republic of Congo.

Although their first attempt to overthrow Lumumba, which happened shortly after the independence of the Republic of Congo, was failed, that did not stop US and Belgium at all, and the documentary pulls no punch about how the United Nations did not do anything about that while keeping its appearance as usual under the leadership of Dag Hammarskjöld, who was UN Secretary-General during that time. Although there was actually some progress in the United Nations, Hammarskjöld also indirectly assisted another American plot against Lumumba, and Lumumba consequently found himself cornered more and more until his eventual death in 1961.

Mainly via the quotes from a number of various sources including “My Country, Africa” by Andrée Blouin and “Congo Inc.” by In Koli Jean Bofane, the documentary also tells us a bit about the human sufferings resulted from the political interference from US and other western countries during that time. During next several decades, the people of Congo suffered one political turmoil after another, and they and their country are still exploited a lot even at this point, as the documentary briefly but sharply reminds us from time to time (Have you ever thought about where those precious metallic parts of your smartphone come from?)

In conclusion, “Soundtrack to a Coup d’Etat” is impressive for the dexterous handling of its rather complex main subject, and I am already quite willing to revisit for more appreciation on its considerable achievement. In short, this is one of the most interesting documentaries of last year, and I assure you that you will not forget easily the rich and compelling experience provided by this extraordinary documentary.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Caravaggio’s Shadow (2022) ☆☆☆(3/4): An artist between the holy and the secular

“Caravaggio’s Shadow”, which incidentally came to South Korean theaters in last month, is fascinated with what inspired Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio (1571 ~ 1610), who was one of the best artists in Italy around the early 17th century. Although he was a rather unpleasant men to say the least, the movie attempts to illustrate his artistic passion and struggle vividly across the screen, and the result is fairly engaging on the whole.

The movie begins with how Caravaggio, who is vigorously played by Riccardo Scamarcio (You may remember him for his substantial supporting role in Kenneth Branagh’s “A Haunting in Venice” (2023), by the way), got into a big trouble around the late 1600s. In 1606, he happened to murder some criminal dude, so he had to run away from Rome and then went to Napoli, where he could be protected by a noblewoman who was one of his most influential sponsors. During next four years, he waits there as expecting the pardon from the Pope, but the Pope is understandably reluctant while also ordering a secret investigation on Caravaggio’s life and career.

His appointed investigator, who is stiffly played by Louis Garrel, is ready to go all the way for his secret mission. Throughout the story, he interviews or interrogates a number of various people associated with Caravaggio, and each of them is certainly bound to tell the investigator everything regardless of whether they are willing to do that or not.

As these people talk in front of the investigator, the movie frequently goes back to Caravaggio’s past. In case of the aforementioned noblewoman, who is played by Isabelle Huppert, she has known him since he was the young son of one of many peasants working under her family, and she genuinely cares about him and his art, even though she is also not so willing to the cross the line between them. After all, Caravaggio is your average hedonistic womanizer, and the movie does not hesitate to show his rather fluid sexuality as shown from a brief scene where he heedlessly throws himself into one big private orgy.

Whenever he is not in the pursuit of carnal pleasure, Caravaggio pays attention to those shabby and seedy denizens at the bottom of Rome, who were often the models for a number of his religious paintings drawn for the Catholic Church as well as many nobles in Italy. These paintings surely drew a lot of attention for their bold and striking beauty, but the Catholic Church and its head were understandably not so pleased about where Caravaggio got his artistic inspiration. In case of one of his religious paintings, he used a certain well-known prostitute as the model for the holy mother in that painting, and the Pope was certainly not amused to learn that after admiring that painting so much.

Needless to say, as his fearless paintings cause a lot of stir and anger in Rome, Caravaggio enjoys his fame and notoriety while not giving a damn about making more enemies in the city. As he mingles more with those low-life people in the city, he gets more inspiration to drive him further, and it looks like nothing can stop him at all, until that nasty incident of his happens.

While never making any excuse about Caravaggio’s many human flaws and vices, the movie observes his irrepressible artistic spirit with real curiosity and fascination, and it sometimes beholds some of his notable creations along with us for a while. Somewhere between the holy and the secular, these paintings are alternatively impressive and provocative, and that is what good artworks can do in my humble opinion.

Around the point where it approaches to its expected conclusion, the movie begins to lose some of its narrative momentum. The eventual finale is a bit too anti-climactic compared to what has been steadily built up to that point, and many of the supporting characters surrounding Caravaggio are rather under-developed as they simply come and go throughout the story, and the investigator remains to be more or less than a mere device for the frame of the story.

At least, director Michele Placido, who also wrote the screenplay with Sandro Petraglia and Fidel Signorile, and his crew members including cinematographer Michele D’Attanasio did a commendable job of filling the screen with palpable period atmosphere and details to be savored. As the movie often swings back and forth between the secular and holy sides of Rome, we get to sense more of what inspired Caravaggio during that time, and that is particularly evident when Caravaggio is about to draw one of his best paintings at one point later in the story, which vividly depicts the dead body of a young prostitute he knew.

Around Scamarcio’s solid lead performance, the other main cast members including Huppert and Garrel simply fill their respective spots as required. While Garrel is mostly limited by his thankless role, Huppert manages to leave some impression despite her under-written part, and she has her own little moment when her character struggles with her private feelings toward Caravaggio.

In conclusion, “Caravaggio’s Shadow” is not wholly without weak points, but I enjoyed its period mood and details enough for recommendation. It surely reminds me again that some of the greatest artists are not pleasant people at all, but it also makes me reflect on how their art can still impress us regardless of whether we can really separate art from its human creator at all.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

The Spirit of the Beehive (1973) ☆☆☆☆(4/4): A fantasy of silence and whispers

Víctor Erice’s 1973 film “The Spirit of the Beehive”, which is currently being shown in South Korean theaters after his recent comeback work “Close Your Eyes” (2023) came in last year, has delicately sublime qualities to be admired and appreciated. Masterfully balancing itself between the simplicity of childhood fantasy and the ambiguity of allegorical drama, the movie has a series of mesmerizing moments to intrigue or enchant you, which will linger on your mind for a long time after it is over.

The main background of the movie is a small, isolated village located in the middle of the Castilian plateau of Spain during its post-Civil War period. At the beginning of the story, the whole town is getting quite excited by the upcoming screening of classic American horror film “Frankenstein” (1931) by a mobile cinema, and we soon see many adult and child audiences watching that film at their little town hall.

One of the audiences is a 6-year-old girl named Ana (Ana Torrent), who comes along with her older sister Isabel (Isabel Tellería). She is quite baffled when the movie, which is incidentally the censored version, does not show why and how the Monster kills that unfortunate little girl. She immediately asks Isabel, who later “explains” to her younger sister that 1) the monster actually does not kill that little girl (“Everything in the movies is fake.”) and 2) he is actually alive somewhere out there as a spirit.

Like any young innocent girl around her age, Ana believes her older sister’s harmless lie without any doubt, and we observe how this little white lie leads to Ana’s own little fantasy. After their school time is over on the very next day, they go to an abandoned barn located in the middle of the plateau outside the village, and Isabel elaborates a bit more on her lie. As a result, Ana comes to believe more in the spiritual presence of the Monster around that abandoned barn.

Meanwhile, we gradually sense a faint sense of uneasiness in their family house while noticing how distant their parents often look to each other. Their middle-aged father is mostly occupied with his beekeeping work unless he writes about honeybees inside his library. In case of their mother, she frequently writes letters to somebody, but the movie does not give much detail on the receiver of these letters, except that the receiver is probably someone to whom she was quite close before the Civil War.

These two adult figures’ frequent silence throughout the film has been interpreted as the indirect reflection of how things were grim and oppressive for many people in Spain after the end of the Civil War, which was the beginning of Francisco Franco’s dictatorship which lasted more than 30 years. As a matter of fact, the movie was made not long before the end of that gloomy period, but it was actually allowed to be released in Spain just because, besides the critical success outside Spain, those local censors thought the movie would be too “arty” to draw the public attention.

Yes, it is certainly slow and opaque as your average arthouse movie, but the movie decorates its ambiguous allegory with indelible mood and details to intrigue and then engage us more. Although he was losing his eyesight due to his terminal illness during that time, cinematographer Luis Cuadrado vividly captures the earthy beauty of the Castilian plateau on the screen, and he also imbues considerable poetic qualities to many of interior scenes inside the girls’ house. These interior scenes are visually striking as shrouded in warm and bright yellow lighting, whose honey-like hue is clearly connected with those beehives taken care of by the girls’ father.

Some of you may wonder whether the mechanical aspects of the daily life inside beehives, which is mentioned via the father’s writing more than once in the film, is a symbolic metaphor of the Spanish society oppressed under the Franco regime. Again, the movie does not specify anything at all, and it continues to stick to its restrained attitude – even when its young heroine encounters a mysterious figure who fuels her imagination more. The situation subsequently becomes a bit tense when her little fantasy inevitably clashes with the reality of the adult figures around her, and everything in the story culminates to an eerily poignant moment, not long after she inadvertently causes a big trouble for others.   

Ana Torrent, who has been steadily active during last 50 years since her acting debut here in this film (It is certainly nice to see her again in “Close Your Eyes”, by the way), is simply astonishing in what can be regarded as one of the best child performances in the movie history. Often direct and expressive in her unadorned acting, she effortlessly conveys her character’s silent emotional journey along the story, and she also clicks well with her co-star Isabel Tellería, who also has a few memorable moments of hers around Torrent.  

On the whole, “The Spirit of the Beehive”, which has been regarded as one of the greatest Spanish films during the late 20th century, is superlative even when it is simply viewed as a childhood fantasy tale. It is quite a shame that Erice only made three feature films since “The Spirit of the Beehive”, but “Close Your Eyes” demonstrated that he has not lost any of his talent yet, and it is really fortunate for me and other South Korean audiences to get a chance to see both of these two masterworks in movie theater.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Persona a Strange Girl (2023) ☆☆☆(3/4): That elusive girl

South Korean independent film “Persona a Strange Girl” reminds me again of how the works of Hong Sang-soo have considerable influence over South Korean independent cinema for many years. Just like the works of Woody Allen have been followed by numerous similar juniors, Hong’s works also have had a fair share of juniors during last two decades, and I must tell you that some of them are fairly good while others are merely forgettable.

In case of “Persona a Stranger Girl”, the influence from Hong’s works is quite evident from the beginning to the end. First, it was shot in black and white film just like some of Hong’s works. Second, it has several extended conversation scenes, and the camera mostly sticks to its static position except when it occasionally does some panning, just like many of Hong’s works. Third, it is mainly about one beautiful but elusive young woman usually regarded by one petty male artist. To be frank with you, if I only told you these three things, you would mistake the movie for the latest work from Hong.

That elusive young woman in question is Hye-ri (Jeon Hye-yeon), who recently comes to join a little independent theater company who has been led by a middle-aged director named Hae-young (Park Ho-san). During her audition, she impresses Hae-yeong and his two colleagues a lot right from the beginning, and they are certainly curious about her as she begins to work along with several other members of the company.

Although she is quite active as a new member, Hye-ri sometimes baffles or surprises many others around her including Hae-young. For example, she is not particularly willing to hang around with many of her colleagues, and she does not tell a lot about herself while only saying that she recently studied computer engineering at Seoul National University, which is incidentally one of the most prestigious ones in South Korea. However, when the company prepares for a new production, she provides some interesting insight on the play to be performed, and it is apparent that she is a smart woman simply willing to try something different here in the company.

However, who is she really? That is the question for not only us but also Hae-yeong, who finds himself gradually smitten with her even though he does not signify much as maintaining his usual reserved appearance. As his company keeps working on their latest production, he soon begins to hear about some rumors about Hye-ri, and there are also a few professional issues to be handled in one or another.

Meanwhile, the movie sometimes pays attention to what Hye-ri does whenever she is not working in the company. She often goes to a nearby mountain, and that is where she encounters a foreign girl and the guest lead actress invited to the latest production of the company, respectively. While both of these two figures are total strangers to her, it does not take much time for Hye-ri to befriend each of them mainly thanks to her easygoing attitude, and we accordingly get some glimpse on her plucky personality.

And we also see how things can be quite unpleasant in the company. It turns out that the company has mistreated and exploited some of its young members, and Hae-young tries to handle the situation as much as possible, but he remains quite passive when one of his colleagues harshly and unjustly berates an ex-member of their company at one point in the story. In addition, the main sponsor of the company seems very interested in getting closer to Hye-ri, and that is soon noticed by not only Hye-ri but also a few others in the company.

It goes without saying that there eventually comes a moment when Hae-young confronts Hye-ri as the rumors about her grow more and more. As their conversation gets more intense, we observe that 1) she does not deserve this at all regardless of whether she was totally honest to Hae-young and others from the very beginning and 2) Hae-young is no better than many of his colleagues who casually show their misogynistic bias from time to time.

The screenplay by director/writer Jung Hyung-suk, who made a feature film debut with “The Night View of the Ocean in Yeosu” (2017), falters a bit during its rather unresolved finale, but the movie is still engaging in its dry but realistic depiction of the daily work of Hae-young and others around him. Yes, they all want to do something better and greater someday, but they are always bound by their jaded reality, and the movie generates a bit of amusement from a small subplot involved with the election for the president of some powerful association in their field.

The two lead performers at the center of the film did a credible job on the whole. While Park Ho-san steadily holds the ground with his low-key acting, Jeon Hye-yeon often exudes charm and spirit during many of her scenes in the film, and we come to respect and then care about her even though we are not so totally sure about her true self even in the end.

Overall, “Persona a Strange Girl” does not surpass its main source of inspiration, but it is still a competent work supported well by its good mood and its solid lead performances. By the way, Hong’s upcoming new film will be soon premiered at the Berlin International Film Festival and then get released in South Korea, and it will be really interesting to see whether Hong’s new film is better than this mildly enjoyable piece.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Silver Apricot (2024) ☆☆☆(3/4): Dealing with her dysfunctional family

South Korean independent film “Silver Apricot” is about one young woman who must deal with several flawed family members who have been estranged from her for many years. This is surely a familiar story setting, but the movie did a good job of balancing itself between humor and drama as deftly developing its main characters along the story, and we are alternatively amused and touched while having some understanding on our heroine and her family members.

At first, the movie establishes how Jeong-seo (Na Ae-jin), a young female independent online cartoonist who has been earning her meager living as an office worker, happens to need to get a considerable amount of cash as soon as possible. She recently won an apartment application, and she and her boyfriend Kyeong-hyeon (Kang Bong-sung), who is one of the co-workers at her current workplace and has also been planning along with her on getting married sooner or later, are certainly delighted for that, but, alas, they do not have enough money to pay the deposit right now. Jung-seo later asks for some cash from her divorced mother Mi-yeong (Park Hyun-sook), but Mi-yeong only suggests that Jeong-seo should go to her father Young-joo (Ahn Suk-hwan) instead, who promised to pay his ex-wife 90 million won during their divorce but has not yet paid any of her alimony at all.

With a little old I.O.U. paper written by her father at that time, Jeong-seo goes to a little seaside town where her father has lived with his second wife Kyeong-ok (Yoon Seo-jung) and his stepdaughter Jeong-hae (Kim Jin-young). Not so surprisingly, Young-joo is not so willing to pay her 90 million won right now even though he willingly welcomes his daughter, and his second wife is certainly not so pleased with Jeong-seo’s visit, though Jeong-hae is delighted to see her older stepsister again.

As getting stuck more and more with these family members of hers during next several days, Jeong-seo is reminded again and again of why she still does not like them that much. Her father keeps promising her that he will find an alternative for her urgent need of cash, but he only comes to show more of how unreliable he really is, and this becomes more evident to her when Jung-seo’s boyfriend eventually comes to meet her family members. While Kyeong-ok often emphasizes to Jung-seo that she will not step back at all for the interest of her and her daughter, Jeong-hae turns out to have a little motive behind befriending her older stepsister again, and that certainly brings more headache for Jeong-seo.

At least, Jeong-seo gets some consolation from her two old friends, though both of them remind her more of why she left her hometown. While Hae-jeong (Park Mi-so) is now working as a local taxi driver, Tae-joon (Jo Ha-sung) chose to pursue a military career instead of becoming a cartoonist just like her, and he and Jeong-seo come to have a bitter reflection on how things have changed for both of them, when they happen to have a little private time between them at one point in the middle of the story.

Leisurely rolling its story and characters, the screenplay by director/writer Jang Man-min, who makes a feature film debut here after making several short films, fleshes out its complicated main characters with more details and emotions. As not only her family members but also her boyfriend frustrate and annoy her more and more along the story, Jeong-seo comes to reflect more on what she really wants – what she really should do for that. Yes, she really wants to have a stable residence to help her pay more attention to drawing her little online cartoon, but she has also been becoming a mere office worker just like her boyfriend, and that makes her all the more conflicted about whether it is actually worthwhile to get the money by any means necessary for paying the deposit for her future apartment. While letting down her in one way or another, Jeong-seo’s family members turn out to have each own reason behind their back, and Jeong-seo comes to see more of herself from her younger stepsister, who is also eager to get away from her hometown as soon as possible just like Jeong-seo once was many years ago.

As the center of the film, Na Ae-jin, who incidentally received an award for her performance when it was shown at the Jeonju International Film Festival early in last year, is convincing as a jaded young woman who has had a fair share of disappointment and frustration throughout her whole life. Even when her character makes a couple of big decisions around the end of the story, Na steadily maintains her low-key acting without any misstep, and we come to root for her character more than before.

Around Na, Jang assembles a number of good performers, who have each own moment as ably supporting her. While Ahn Suk-hwan makes his utterly pathetic character somehow likable without any excuse at all, Yoon Seo-jung, Jo Ha-sung, Park Mi-so, Kang Bong-sung, and Kim Jin-young are also effective in their respective parts, and Park Hyun-sook is especially good when her character and Jeong-seo happen to have a brief private conversation on their strained relationship later in the story.

In conclusion, “Silver Apricot” is a solid family drama which distinguishes itself enough with engaging storytelling and performance, which thankfully compensate for several flaws to notice (I do not think changing the screen ratio more than once does not work as dramatically as intended, for example). In short, Jang made a commendable start here in this film, and it will be interesting to see what may come from him next.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Heritage (2023) ☆☆(2/4): Two different young people in desperation

South Korean independent film “Heritage” is often frustratingly slow and opaque in my humble opinion. Mainly revolving around two different young persons in each own desperation, the movie attempts to make some point on the generational/social divides in the South Korean society, but the result is too bland and tedious as failing to make its main characters engaging enough to hold our attention.

I must confess that it is often hard to understand whatever is exchanged between its two main characters. Yes, it is clear that one of these two people really needs some help, but this figure remains a distant cipher to the end of the story to our frustration, and we cannot discern much of what the other main figure in the story really sees from him.

In the beginning, we are introduced to a lad named Jin-hyun (Yoon Hyeok-jin), who has worked in some local social service center located somewhere in Seoul. He has been handling a younger dude named Young-jin (Ahn Eun-son), and we come to gather that Young-jin was exempted from the mandatory military service and then has to do his conscription as a temporary employee at the center in exchange for that.

Anyway, Young-jin has often annoyed Jin-hyun and his department because he is frequently late for work, and then Jin-hyun happens to discover what Young-jin has been hiding behind his quiet passive appearance. Young-jin was recently kicked out of his house by his father for a rather unspecified reason, and there is no one around him to help him. As a result, he has spent many sleepless nights under the concrete highway bridge near to the social service center, and that is the main reason why he has been often late for his work.

Probably because of feeling sorry for Young-jin, Jin-hyun takes him to a little apartment where he has lived alone by himself. He is going to let Young-jin stay in his residence for a while at least before finding any possible way to support Young-jin more, but the social service center is not so willing to do anything more for Young-jin due to those regulations, and Young-jin becomes more burdensome for Jin-hyun as he continues to stay at Jin-hyun’s residence.

Meanwhile, the movie also pays some attention to what is going on between Jin-hyun and an old lady who frequently comes to the social service center. Just like Young-jin, this old lady needs more support and assistance from the center, but, again, Jin-hyun only gets more frustrated while not being able to help her, and he becomes quite exasperated as he later finds himself sandwiched between her and his uncaring supervisor.

Around that narrative point, we are supposed to get to know more Jin-hyun and several other characters in the story, but the screenplay by director/writer Lee Jong-su, who incidentally made a feature film debut here, does not flesh out its story and characters more to interest us. While we only get a bit of background information on Jin-hyun’s past, the movie does not specify much of Young-jin’s life on the whole, and it also does not even delve much into his thoughts and feelings except when it occasionally shows the video clips shot by his little video camera.

Most of all, whatever is happening between Jin-hyun and Young-jin is not particularly interesting. While Jin-hyun talks and talks, Young-jin merely exists right next to him as showing a bit of response from time to time, and the movie even makes a sort of statement when Jin-hyun talks about why he often watched movies some time ago. At one point, he says watching movies is like looking into the lives of others, but I must say that looking into the lives of him and others around him was not a very interesting experience for me because the movie simply observes them while not doing that much for any understanding or empathy. While there are several flashbacks for showing more of its main characters along the story, these flashback scenes only end up feeling quite contrived and superficial, and we still watch these main characters from the distance without much care.

In case of the three principal cast members in the film, they merely fill their respective spots as required while not having anything else to do besides that. Yoon Hyeok-jin did a good job of conveying to us the accumulating frustration behind his character’s phlegmatic appearance, but he is also often limited by his bland character, and the same thing can be said about Ahn Eun-soo, who gets stuck with a thankless task of looking dispirited and unresponsive throughout the film. In contrast, Na Ho-sook has a couple of relatively showy moments as the aforementioned old lady, and we come to have some understanding on her character’s growing desperation even when she happens to lash out at Jin-hyun later in the story.

In conclusion, “Heritage” bored and frustrated me due to its glacial narrative pacing and barebone narrative, and I felt more annoyed by the ending, which looks like tacked on the preceding scene without much dramatic effect. As another gloomy social drama about the dark sides of the South Korean society, it does not bring anything particular new to the territory, and I can only hope that the director will soon move onto better things to come.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Animal Kingdom (2023) ☆☆☆(3/4): When people are turning into animals

French film “The Animal Kingdom” is a modest but intriguing SF drama with enough style and substance to interest and then engage us. Although it is rather a bit too vague about its story premise, the movie stays focused on story and characters in addition to having a fair amount of mood and details to observe, and the result is an interesting genre piece with some haunting qualities to be appreciated.

Right from the beginning, the movie throws us right into how things have become quite different for its two main characters, François (Romain Duris) and his teenage son Émile (Pual Kircher), and many others around the world. There has been the global outbreak of a mysterious disease turning humans into various animals, and the French government has been trying to get things under control via isolating many of those infected people as much as possible, though numerous people still get infected and then isolated everyday.

In case of François, his wife has been hospitalized since she turned out to be infected, and, despite his hope and efforts, his wife has only become less and less human instead. In the end, his wife is going to be sent off to some secluded area located somewhere in Southern France along with many other infected people, so he decides to move to that area along with his son, though Émile is not so particularly pleased about that as getting more distant from not only his father but also his infected mother.

However, an unexpected incident happens not long after François and his son move to that region. A carrier truck carrying those infected people including François’ wife crashed down to a river before its arrival, and it looks like many of those infected people in the truck managed to survive and then escape. As the local police embark on hunting for these fugitives, François decides to look for his wife for himself, and his son joins him although he still feels conflicted about his mother.

Not so surprisingly, François soon finds himself facing dead ends in his rather unproductive search process, while also reminded of how the circumstance becomes more serious for him and many others in the region. As a female local police officer informs him later, the military already join the search, and both the police and the military are ready to kill those infected people if that seems necessary.

This makes François all the more determined to find his wife, but this also makes him more distant to his son, who turns out to have some very serious issues behind his mostly passive attitude. While struggling to adjust himself to his new school, Émile also finds his own body beginning to show a number of alarming signs, and that makes him more withdrawn from his father.

Patiently rolling the story and characters, director/co-writer Thomas Cailley, who wrote the screenplay with Pauline Munier, also pays a lot of attention to bringing considerable realism to the screen. While it surely utilizes a lot of CGI in case of depicting several infected figures in the film, the movie dryly maintains a considerable degree of realism on the screen, and these infected figures certainly make a striking impression on us whenever they enter the plainly realistic background of the film.

Above all, the movie makes us care more about the relationship drama between its two main characters. While he is not exactly the one who can get the Father of the Year award, François simply does what he thinks is the best for his wife as well as his son, and Émile understands that to some degree. Although they do not communicate that well with each other, they also care a lot about each other nonetheless, and that is evident particularly when François makes a big important decision for his son later in the story.

Under Cailley’s competent direction, his several main cast members are convincing as ordinary people trying to handle their extraordinary situation. Romain Duris, who was terrific in Jacques Audiard’s “The Beat That My Heart Skipped” (2005), is effective as embodying his character’s gritty determination, and his intense performance is matched well with the sensitive low-key acting of Paul Kircher, who is incidentally the eldest son of Irène Jacob and Jérôme Kircher. Whenever they are together on the screen, Duris and Kircher deftly convey to us the shared long history between their characters, which comes to function as the solid ground for the eventual climactic part of the story.

In case of the other main cast members, they just occupy their respective spots around Duris and Kircher, but some of them manage to elevate their thankless supporting roles a bit. While Adèle Exarchopoulos, who has steadily advanced since her breakthrough performance in “Blue Is the Warmest Color” (2013), is rather under-utilized to my disappointment, Tom Mercier and Billie Blain are well-cast in their respective substantial parts, and they have each own moment to shine along the story.

In conclusion, “The Animal Kingdom”, which is the second feature film from Cailley after “Love at First Sight” (2014), works fairly well despite some weak points, and I admire its mood, storytelling, and performance enough on the whole. Although I have not seen “Love at First Sight” yet, “The Animal Kingdom” shows that Cailley is another promising filmmaker to watch, and it will be interesting to see what he may do next after this engaging genre film.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Memory (2023) ☆☆☆(3/4): An accidental romance tale between two troubled persons

Micheal Franco’s latest film “Memory” is about an accidental romance between two troubled persons. While both of them have each own issue to struggle with, they cannot help but attracted to each other after their rather unpleasant encounter, and the movie gently and thoughtfully depicts their emotional struggles with enough understanding and empathy.

At first, the movie dryly establishes the daily life of Sylvia (Jessica Chastain), a single mother who has earned her living via working at a adult care center. As shown from the opening scene, she has been a recovering alcoholic during last 13 years, and we can only imagine how much she struggled before joining her support group for alcoholics 13 years ago. 

During one evening, Sylvia attends her high school reunion party along with her younger sister Olivia (Merritt Wever), and that is when she happens to draw the attention of one of the guys attending the party. When he approaches to her, she rejects his approach, and she becomes more disturbed when he is following after her for some unknown reason after she eventually leaves the party. In the end, he waits outside her residence, and this certainly makes Sylvia all the more disturbed.

In the next morning, this guy is still waiting outside Sylvia’s residence. After confirming that he does not mean any harm, she finds who she should call for him, and she soon comes to learn what his problem is. Saul (Peter Sarsgaard) has been suffering from the early onset of dementia, and he has been living along with his younger brother because of that.

Sylvia is later invited to Saul’s apartment, and then she and Saul have a little private time between them. While Saul does not remember anything about why he followed after her on that day, Sylvia tells something disturbing about her very problematic past. When she was about to enter her adolescence period, she was sexually abused by a certain older high school student and one of his friends, and she thinks Saul is the one who sexually abused her along with that horrible student at that time.

Mainly because Saul does not recognize her at all, Sylvia becomes quite angry as thinking more about that traumatic past of hers. As revealed to us later in the story, nobody believed her story of sexual abuse at that time, and that was the main reason why there has been considerable distance between her and her family members. While she and her younger sister remain cordial to each other, there is always some awkwardness between them, and she still does not want to see her mother again because her mother has refused to believe whatever she tried to tell her mother.

However, it subsequently turns out that Saul was actually not responsible at all for that sexual abuse upon her during that time, so Sylvia naturally apologizes to him, and she soon finds herself attracted to him just like he has been drawn to her – especially after she is requested to take care of him during his younger brother’s absence. While his ongoing illness is surely getting worse day by day, Sylvia steadily stands by him as his caregiver, and, what do you know, they look more like a couple as days go by.

Around that narrative point, Franco’s screenplay delves further into the issues of its two main characters, and we see more of how things are going to remain problematic for each of them. Saul eventually comes to stay at Sylvia’s apartment at least for a while, but, not so surprisingly, he comes to need constant care more than before as he becomes quite confused more often than before. In case of Sylvia, she comes to confront her old family problem again, and there is a hurtful moment when she eventually lets out her childhood trauma in front of her family members including her mother, who still adamantly does not listen at all to whatever her daughter says to her.

Like any good character drama, the movie relies a lot on its two lead performers, and their good performances steadily carry the film to the end. Jessica Chastain, who has kept going with her stellar acting career even after eventually winning an Oscar for “The Eyes of Tammy Faye” (2021), is often harrowing as gradually conveying to us her character’s emotional issues along the story, and she is complemented well by Peter Sarsgaard, who received the Best Actor award when the movie was premiered at the 2023 Venice International Film Festival. In case of several other cast members in the movie, they are sometimes limited by their underwritten characters, but Merritt Wever, Jessica Harper, Josh Charles, Brooke Timber, and Elsie Fisher ably fill their respective supporting parts, and it is certainly nice to see Fisher, who was quite memorable in Bo Burnham’s “Eighth Grade” (2018), being ready to move onto the next step of her burgeoning acting career, though she is rather under-utilized in her brief appearance here in this film.   

On the whole, “Memory” is somber but sensitive in terms of mood and storytelling, and the result is more satisfying than Franco’s previous films “New Order” (2020) and “Sundown” (2021). As a matter of fact, he already made his next film with Chastain, and I will surely pay some attention to its upcoming premiere at the Berlin International Film Festival early in this year.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment